» Menu

» Login

» OB/Site News

Omerta News Integration
Comments: 58 - Views: 55215 - Votes: 0
War rating
Comments: 10 - Views: 26443 - Votes: 4
Reporters Wanted!
Comments: 2 - Views: 18364 - Votes: 3
» Articles
Date Comments Rating

General Comments & Major Rumors
Comments: 57,999 - Views: 16,072,326 - Votes: 81
Article is Locked!
Endless Struggle !
Comments: 514 - Views: 18,130 - Votes: 0
23-09 Reset → 30 September 2022, Friday → 12:00 OT
Comments: 72 - Views: 8,962 - Votes: 0
30-09 Welcome to Round #40!
Comments: 2 - Views: 2,214 - Votes: 0
19-09 Congratulations Reichsthaler!
Comments: 0 - Views: 2,077 - Votes: 0
01-09 Not Penny's boat..
Comments: 72 - Views: 18,578 - Votes: 0
21-08 First Family!
Comments: 6 - Views: 2,631 - Votes: 0
12-08 Welcome to Round #39
Comments: 5 - Views: 2,529 - Votes: 0
03-08 Reset → 12 August 2022, Friday → 10:00 OT
Comments: 17 - Views: 5,311 - Votes: 0
27-07 Congratulations Vengeance!
Comments: 8 - Views: 2,763 - Votes: 0
go back
go forward
» Barafranca News

» Online last 15 minutes

Guests: 536
Total members: 3751
Online: 0 (0%)
Members:
03-01 Bloody Sunday
Author: mmm
Last updated: 3283d 10h 36m 18s ago by mmm
Comments: 141
Views: 48,460
Votes: 1 (5 average)
Version: 4.9.3
Involved families: Ancient, Equestria, Ponies, Siberia, Gambino, Nazdrovia, Truva
article
An afternoon war has broken out, Gambino is getting shot by the Soviet Union Alliance.

About 100 minutes after the first fatalities, Nazdrovia decided to get into the mix and starts a counter on the attackers, but many die in backfire in the first wave. Also, the attackers were aware of the detectives that were hired upon them and were ready to strike back immediately.
statements
Schopenhauer (Gambino): You can talk crap about Gambino and ceasefires. Every family ceasefire almost every version because of several reasons. You want Gambino to shoot on new years eve while they shot theirselfs totally empty? Siberia came ask for ceasefire and gambino had 0 backup. People who talk like that don't know shit. Also we never thought our old friends Siberia would shoot us for some turkish dupe family.
We never snitched a war, Why else we would counter on Ancient? Sounds very logical. Still waiting for the logs. They have to make it yet?

Thanks all Gambino's you are great. <3

Banjo (Nazdrovia): We've been hiring on Siberiea that last few nights waiting for this clean to come :)

We are not bloods with Gambino. But we decided to piggyback in the sib v gamb war as we figured after Gambino is dead, we will be cleaned next. So we suicided, sadly our online activity probably tipped a few fams off that we were up to something. So as we were finding Siberia they were finding us :D

Rip All

Critycal (Siberia): A few days ago Gambino thought they could hop on an attack on us, and get our as1's bullet factory while we were busy. They're now paying the price for it.

Judas (Ancient): If there is anyone talking shit/crap schopen it is. :')
And gambinoob was trying to be our bloods but we rejected them since they were taking our spots in our city without any info. Yeah they are since 1.0
It is so weird though, they wanted us to be their bloods and now saying Turkish dupe family. That's more logical.
We still remember the akills of Fuerte with the reason mass duping
Anyways we are fucking, but not angry.
statistics
War started on: 15:02:04 03-01-2016 War ended on: 05:39:03 04-01-2016
Bullet difference: -9,834,991 War duration: 14h 36m
Money difference: -$1,069,505,676 Players died: 97




deaths
Dead Families:
[Truva] Family down on 05:36 04-01
[Nazdrovia] Family down on 00:58 04-01
[Gambino] Family down on 20:11 03-01
Deaths per family:
Sw As LC Ch Br CD GF Points
Equestria | swin: 1 | assa: 0 | lc: 0 | chief: 0 | brug: 0 | cd: 0 | gf: 0 | points: 2
Gambino | swin: 0 | assa: 1 | lc: 6 | chief: 2 | brug: 21 | cd: 0 | gf: 0 | points: 323
Nazdrovia | swin: 1 | assa: 2 | lc: 5 | chief: 6 | brug: 12 | cd: 0 | gf: 0 | points: 238
Siberia | swin: 1 | assa: 0 | lc: 1 | chief: 1 | brug: 4 | cd: 0 | gf: 0 | points: 68
Truva | swin: 0 | assa: 0 | lc: 0 | chief: 1 | brug: 2 | cd: 0 | gf: 0 | points: 34
Total | swin: 3 | assa: 3 | lc: 12 | chief: 10 | brug: 39 | cd: 0 | gf: 0 | points: 665
comments

Add a YouTube movie Add an image Add a link/url Help
GFCM Portugal (20:30:34 - 03-01)
Link Quote
MurderInc at 20:17:54 on 03/01:
Anonymous at 20:13:18 on 03/01:
You do understand you don't need to blood one to shoot Anarchy? Shoot Anarchy together and move on from there. You now walk on very thin ice. You created a downwards spiral that only goes down faster every version you mess up this way. Next time Anarchy is going to be even bigger, they might win a version after one war that way.

The version after that you'll recruit some extra members of small families that don't start anymore because of the game being absolute shit for smaller families. Stop this ongoing mess, it's too late this version, let's do it next version.

I'm in, the question is, will Siberia be in or will we keep having 'winners' that are afraid to play alone? A scared champ is not a respectable champ.
See my follow-up comment on that point. Yes, I agree that next version shouldn't go down like this. Hopefully more families will return next version, or decide to un-merge and do their own thing. I'm not expecting anything big, but a version with at least 2 interesting wars would be nice (like we've had them in the past).

We all agree in changing the path that the game is taking. I've already heard that some families are coming back, which is great. Speaking by myself, there will, at least, be another family going up. However, there is not space at the moment for new/small families play their games, once there are 2 big pacts nowadays. Let's just change that, otherwise versions will still last 3/4 weeks.
GFCM Portugal (20:23:45 - 03-01)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 20:13:18 on 03/01:
MurderInc at 19:48:38 on 03/01:
Anonymous at 19:32:01 on 03/01:
MurderInc at 18:46:37 on 03/01:
Anonymous at 18:42:31 on 03/01:
siberia always cries about how anarchy had the bigger pact but lets have a look at this

siberia aeterna colossal rivera bosphorus nazdrovia ancient karadeniz ferocia lusa equestria

vs

anarchy purgatory samyo navaja savagery cosenza (later blackhand)

and also
siberia had info all the time cause of their rat.

so siberia pls stop crying about pacts and fair play. you played as dirty as you can play and im pretty sure you wont be able to create a family on .com without some monkey business like ranking up with other families and stabbing them when you see the opportunity.
So let me get this straight:
- We were facing a family with 30% of all HRs
- Who had 3-4 more bloods.
- (And, by the way, tried to get many more, but was refused.)
- We had 3 bloods all version.
- All of which are still alive.
- None of which were stabbed by us.
- And we played smart by having a source within the enemies top.

And we're the ones who played dirty and should expect suicides? LOL.


As said before, there are five powerhouses, one is siberia, one anarchy, 3 are your bloods. After the first war this version was over. Siberia and Anarchy play to beat each other in one war. There is nothing impressive beating the small families that are left over after that. None of the big families could attack you because you blooded them. One enemy, where's the fun in that?

I'd like to see you try taking 3 small bloods. You won't dare playing like that, Anarchy won't dare that either.
How would the first war have gone if we were to have taken 3 small families? There are barely any small families with skilled tops in this game. Rivera is the only one that comes to mind right now, there are maybe 2 more if your standards aren't that high. I'm suppose to beat Anarchy alone, just with that? Our hand was forced, we've said as much before. Would we have blooded just 3 small bloods without that factor? Probably not. But we could've probably afforded to stick with 2 of them, or take 2 smaller ones. And our bloods wouldn't have been forced to take the bloodships they took either.


You do understand you don't need to blood one to shoot Anarchy? Shoot Anarchy together and move on from there. You now walk on very thin ice. You created a downwards spiral that only goes down faster every version you mess up this way. Next time Anarchy is going to be even bigger, they might win a version after one war that way.

The version after that you'll recruit some extra members of small families that don't start anymore because of the game being absolute shit for smaller families. Stop this ongoing mess, it's too late this version, let's do it next version.

I'm in, the question is, will Siberia be in or will we keep having 'winners' that are afraid to play alone? A scared champ is not a respectable champ.

\o/
mmm Netherlands (20:23:26 - 03-01)
Link Quote
none at 20:21:21 on 03/01:
MurderInc at 20:17:54 on 03/01:
Anonymous at 20:13:18 on 03/01:
You do understand you don't need to blood one to shoot Anarchy? Shoot Anarchy together and move on from there. You now walk on very thin ice. You created a downwards spiral that only goes down faster every version you mess up this way. Next time Anarchy is going to be even bigger, they might win a version after one war that way.

The version after that you'll recruit some extra members of small families that don't start anymore because of the game being absolute shit for smaller families. Stop this ongoing mess, it's too late this version, let's do it next version.

I'm in, the question is, will Siberia be in or will we keep having 'winners' that are afraid to play alone? A scared champ is not a respectable champ.
See my follow-up comment on that point. Yes, I agree that next version shouldn't go down like this. Hopefully more families will return next version, or decide to un-merge and do their own thing. I'm not expecting anything big, but a version with at least 2 interesting wars would be nice (like we've had them in the past).
your 100% the blame for this all. blooding all big fams. Siberia is more then 1 fam 2. -_-

when are you going to read in all comments which mention Siberia blooded 3 fams from the start?
ites Belgium (20:21:54 - 03-01)
Link Quote
MurderInc at 20:17:54 on 03/01:
Anonymous at 20:13:18 on 03/01:
You do understand you don't need to blood one to shoot Anarchy? Shoot Anarchy together and move on from there. You now walk on very thin ice. You created a downwards spiral that only goes down faster every version you mess up this way. Next time Anarchy is going to be even bigger, they might win a version after one war that way.

The version after that you'll recruit some extra members of small families that don't start anymore because of the game being absolute shit for smaller families. Stop this ongoing mess, it's too late this version, let's do it next version.

I'm in, the question is, will Siberia be in or will we keep having 'winners' that are afraid to play alone? A scared champ is not a respectable champ.
See my follow-up comment on that point. Yes, I agree that next version shouldn't go down like this. Hopefully more families will return next version, or decide to un-merge and do their own thing. I'm not expecting anything big, but a version with at least 2 interesting wars would be nice (like we've had them in the past).

Ok, why are you as1 with Ancient?
none (20:21:21 - 03-01)
Link Quote
MurderInc at 20:17:54 on 03/01:
Anonymous at 20:13:18 on 03/01:
You do understand you don't need to blood one to shoot Anarchy? Shoot Anarchy together and move on from there. You now walk on very thin ice. You created a downwards spiral that only goes down faster every version you mess up this way. Next time Anarchy is going to be even bigger, they might win a version after one war that way.

The version after that you'll recruit some extra members of small families that don't start anymore because of the game being absolute shit for smaller families. Stop this ongoing mess, it's too late this version, let's do it next version.

I'm in, the question is, will Siberia be in or will we keep having 'winners' that are afraid to play alone? A scared champ is not a respectable champ.
See my follow-up comment on that point. Yes, I agree that next version shouldn't go down like this. Hopefully more families will return next version, or decide to un-merge and do their own thing. I'm not expecting anything big, but a version with at least 2 interesting wars would be nice (like we've had them in the past).
your 100% the blame for this all. blooding all big fams. Siberia is more then 1 fam 2. -_-
MurderInc Austria (20:17:54 - 03-01)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 20:13:18 on 03/01:
You do understand you don't need to blood one to shoot Anarchy? Shoot Anarchy together and move on from there. You now walk on very thin ice. You created a downwards spiral that only goes down faster every version you mess up this way. Next time Anarchy is going to be even bigger, they might win a version after one war that way.

The version after that you'll recruit some extra members of small families that don't start anymore because of the game being absolute shit for smaller families. Stop this ongoing mess, it's too late this version, let's do it next version.

I'm in, the question is, will Siberia be in or will we keep having 'winners' that are afraid to play alone? A scared champ is not a respectable champ.
See my follow-up comment on that point. Yes, I agree that next version shouldn't go down like this. Hopefully more families will return next version, or decide to un-merge and do their own thing. I'm not expecting anything big, but a version with at least 2 interesting wars would be nice (like we've had them in the past).
none (20:16:05 - 03-01)
Link Quote
themightyZizus at 20:06:12 on 03/01:
Keira 31-Dec @ 02:37:22 Keira failed to kill you but did some damage, you hit back and did some damage to Keira
Keira 30-Dec @ 22:44:38 Keira failed to kill you but did some damage, you hit back and did some damage to Keira

Yeah, they got me in safehouse that day. :(

ow come on, u were in sh 11h+ or more, then u let sib come to us and safe your ass.
Anonymous (20:13:18 - 03-01)
Link Quote
MurderInc at 19:48:38 on 03/01:
Anonymous at 19:32:01 on 03/01:
MurderInc at 18:46:37 on 03/01:
Anonymous at 18:42:31 on 03/01:
siberia always cries about how anarchy had the bigger pact but lets have a look at this

siberia aeterna colossal rivera bosphorus nazdrovia ancient karadeniz ferocia lusa equestria

vs

anarchy purgatory samyo navaja savagery cosenza (later blackhand)

and also
siberia had info all the time cause of their rat.

so siberia pls stop crying about pacts and fair play. you played as dirty as you can play and im pretty sure you wont be able to create a family on .com without some monkey business like ranking up with other families and stabbing them when you see the opportunity.
So let me get this straight:
- We were facing a family with 30% of all HRs
- Who had 3-4 more bloods.
- (And, by the way, tried to get many more, but was refused.)
- We had 3 bloods all version.
- All of which are still alive.
- None of which were stabbed by us.
- And we played smart by having a source within the enemies top.

And we're the ones who played dirty and should expect suicides? LOL.


As said before, there are five powerhouses, one is siberia, one anarchy, 3 are your bloods. After the first war this version was over. Siberia and Anarchy play to beat each other in one war. There is nothing impressive beating the small families that are left over after that. None of the big families could attack you because you blooded them. One enemy, where's the fun in that?

I'd like to see you try taking 3 small bloods. You won't dare playing like that, Anarchy won't dare that either.
How would the first war have gone if we were to have taken 3 small families? There are barely any small families with skilled tops in this game. Rivera is the only one that comes to mind right now, there are maybe 2 more if your standards aren't that high. I'm suppose to beat Anarchy alone, just with that? Our hand was forced, we've said as much before. Would we have blooded just 3 small bloods without that factor? Probably not. But we could've probably afforded to stick with 2 of them, or take 2 smaller ones. And our bloods wouldn't have been forced to take the bloodships they took either.


You do understand you don't need to blood one to shoot Anarchy? Shoot Anarchy together and move on from there. You now walk on very thin ice. You created a downwards spiral that only goes down faster every version you mess up this way. Next time Anarchy is going to be even bigger, they might win a version after one war that way.

The version after that you'll recruit some extra members of small families that don't start anymore because of the game being absolute shit for smaller families. Stop this ongoing mess, it's too late this version, let's do it next version.

I'm in, the question is, will Siberia be in or will we keep having 'winners' that are afraid to play alone? A scared champ is not a respectable champ.
themightyZizus Israel (20:06:12 - 03-01)
Link Quote
Keira 31-Dec @ 02:37:22 Keira failed to kill you but did some damage, you hit back and did some damage to Keira
Keira 30-Dec @ 22:44:38 Keira failed to kill you but did some damage, you hit back and did some damage to Keira

Yeah, they got me in safehouse that day. :(
Athos (20:04:00 - 03-01)
Link Quote
Critycal at 19:57:54 on 03/01:
Athos at 19:57:04 on 03/01:
Judas (Ancient) :
Anyways we are fucking, but not angry.

Why you were all offline or safehouse three days ago ?
Before fucking, look at Your ass first. You can be angry
So they could survive to do this war. Pretty fucking obvious to ask something like that on a wartopic :')
Hope You will be up next Mate, See You soon
MurderInc Austria (20:01:15 - 03-01)
Link Quote
Kapow at 19:53:07 on 03/01:
MurderInc at 19:48:38 on 03/01:
How would the first war have gone if we were to have taken 3 small families? There are barely any small families with skilled tops in this game. Rivera is the only one that comes to mind right now, there are maybe 2 more if your standards aren't that high. I'm suppose to beat Anarchy alone, just with that? Our hand was forced, we've said as much before. Would we have blooded just 3 small bloods without that factor? Probably not. But we could've probably afforded to stick with 2 of them, or take 2 smaller ones. And our bloods wouldn't have been forced to take the bloodships they took either.

Yow.. I don't care about the rest of this silly convos. But you would win First war either way just by inviting everyone to shoot Anarchy. Cause everyone hated Anarchy. Small bloods or no Bloods the result would be same.

- Note - I am not the anonymous pleb in your argument.
This might or might not be true, hard to guess in advance. Take a look at Gambino, whose single goal before this version started was (as they put it) to kill Anarchy. They still refused to join the war when their other bloods entered the counter. Would've been a smart move if we were to get killed, or if both sides were damaged more seriously. Didn't work out for them. I imagine a lot of other fams would've thought similarly.

Plus, there's the argument of, you know, what's the point of not blooding someone when they're shooting with you anyway. Using them and then gangbanging them won't make the game that much more interesting.

Indeed, you're just a regular pleb, not anonymous. <3
Critycal Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Patron (19:57:54 - 03-01)
Link Quote
Athos at 19:57:04 on 03/01:
Judas (Ancient) :
Anyways we are fucking, but not angry.

Why you were all offline or safehouse three days ago ?
Before fucking, look at Your ass first. You can be angry
So they could survive to do this war. Pretty fucking obvious to ask something like that on a wartopic :')
Athos (19:57:04 - 03-01)
Link Quote
Judas (Ancient) :
Anyways we are fucking, but not angry.

Why you were all offline or safehouse three days ago ?
Before fucking, look at Your ass first. You can be angry
Kapow Greenland Patron (19:53:07 - 03-01)
Link Quote
MurderInc at 19:48:38 on 03/01:
How would the first war have gone if we were to have taken 3 small families? There are barely any small families with skilled tops in this game. Rivera is the only one that comes to mind right now, there are maybe 2 more if your standards aren't that high. I'm suppose to beat Anarchy alone, just with that? Our hand was forced, we've said as much before. Would we have blooded just 3 small bloods without that factor? Probably not. But we could've probably afforded to stick with 2 of them, or take 2 smaller ones. And our bloods wouldn't have been forced to take the bloodships they took either.

Yow.. I don't care about the rest of this silly convos. But you would win First war either way just by inviting everyone to shoot Anarchy. Cause everyone hated Anarchy. Small bloods or no Bloods the result would be same.

- Note - I am not the anonymous pleb in your argument.
MurderInc Austria (19:48:38 - 03-01)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 19:32:01 on 03/01:
MurderInc at 18:46:37 on 03/01:
Anonymous at 18:42:31 on 03/01:
siberia always cries about how anarchy had the bigger pact but lets have a look at this

siberia aeterna colossal rivera bosphorus nazdrovia ancient karadeniz ferocia lusa equestria

vs

anarchy purgatory samyo navaja savagery cosenza (later blackhand)

and also
siberia had info all the time cause of their rat.

so siberia pls stop crying about pacts and fair play. you played as dirty as you can play and im pretty sure you wont be able to create a family on .com without some monkey business like ranking up with other families and stabbing them when you see the opportunity.
So let me get this straight:
- We were facing a family with 30% of all HRs
- Who had 3-4 more bloods.
- (And, by the way, tried to get many more, but was refused.)
- We had 3 bloods all version.
- All of which are still alive.
- None of which were stabbed by us.
- And we played smart by having a source within the enemies top.

And we're the ones who played dirty and should expect suicides? LOL.


As said before, there are five powerhouses, one is siberia, one anarchy, 3 are your bloods. After the first war this version was over. Siberia and Anarchy play to beat each other in one war. There is nothing impressive beating the small families that are left over after that. None of the big families could attack you because you blooded them. One enemy, where's the fun in that?

I'd like to see you try taking 3 small bloods. You won't dare playing like that, Anarchy won't dare that either.
How would the first war have gone if we were to have taken 3 small families? There are barely any small families with skilled tops in this game. Rivera is the only one that comes to mind right now, there are maybe 2 more if your standards aren't that high. I'm suppose to beat Anarchy alone, just with that? Our hand was forced, we've said as much before. Would we have blooded just 3 small bloods without that factor? Probably not. But we could've probably afforded to stick with 2 of them, or take 2 smaller ones. And our bloods wouldn't have been forced to take the bloodships they took either.
Anonymous (19:44:57 - 03-01)
Link Quote
update the story please
colossal is shooting nazdrovia aswell.
Anonymous (19:32:01 - 03-01)
Link Quote
MurderInc at 18:46:37 on 03/01:
Anonymous at 18:42:31 on 03/01:
siberia always cries about how anarchy had the bigger pact but lets have a look at this

siberia aeterna colossal rivera bosphorus nazdrovia ancient karadeniz ferocia lusa equestria

vs

anarchy purgatory samyo navaja savagery cosenza (later blackhand)

and also
siberia had info all the time cause of their rat.

so siberia pls stop crying about pacts and fair play. you played as dirty as you can play and im pretty sure you wont be able to create a family on .com without some monkey business like ranking up with other families and stabbing them when you see the opportunity.
So let me get this straight:
- We were facing a family with 30% of all HRs
- Who had 3-4 more bloods.
- (And, by the way, tried to get many more, but was refused.)
- We had 3 bloods all version.
- All of which are still alive.
- None of which were stabbed by us.
- And we played smart by having a source within the enemies top.

And we're the ones who played dirty and should expect suicides? LOL.


As said before, there are five powerhouses, one is siberia, one anarchy, 3 are your bloods. After the first war this version was over. Siberia and Anarchy play to beat each other in one war. There is nothing impressive beating the small families that are left over after that. None of the big families could attack you because you blooded them. One enemy, where's the fun in that?

I'd like to see you try taking 3 small bloods. You won't dare playing like that, Anarchy won't dare that either.
Anonymous (19:30:28 - 03-01)
Link Quote
finally bosphorus is #1 worth . siberia or bosphorus? who is going to create the bigger pact....

*grabs popcorn*
Critycal Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Patron (19:14:34 - 03-01)
Link Quote
darklazytologin at 19:13:28 on 03/01:
critlazyloginhidark at 19:06:19 on 03/01:
ites at 19:02:52 on 03/01:
MurderInc at 19:01:46 on 03/01:
ites at 19:00:42 on 03/01:
MurderInc at 18:58:30 on 03/01:
Anonymous at 18:55:34 on 03/01:
MurderInc at 18:46:37 on 03/01:
Anonymous at 18:42:31 on 03/01:
siberia always cries about how anarchy had the bigger pact but lets have a look at this

siberia aeterna colossal rivera bosphorus nazdrovia ancient karadeniz ferocia lusa equestria

vs

anarchy purgatory samyo navaja savagery cosenza (later blackhand)

and also
siberia had info all the time cause of their rat.

so siberia pls stop crying about pacts and fair play. you played as dirty as you can play and im pretty sure you wont be able to create a family on .com without some monkey business like ranking up with other families and stabbing them when you see the opportunity.
So let me get this straight:
- We were facing a family with 30% of all HRs
- Who had 3-4 more bloods.
- (And, by the way, tried to get many more, but was refused.)
- We had 3 bloods all version.
- All of which are still alive.
- None of which were stabbed by us.
- And we played smart by having a source within the enemies top.

And we're the ones who played dirty and should expect suicides? LOL.
like you didnt create a mass pact huh? having a source within the enemies top does not prove that you are smart. it proves anarchy crews idiocy.
siberia goes offline/sh for 6 hours while the mass pact shooting for them. (this must prove that siberia is the best fam with their ONLY 3 bloods LOL)
this kind of answers really fits on you fking cheater :) if admins had any honor they would ban you forever for your dupes/scripts etc. but its all about the money these days... (they will probably ban me for like 4 days cause i tell the truth ) :)))
I've had a single akill in my omerta life. Get a grasp on reality, kid.

darklazytologin at 18:55:22 on 03/01:
You can get them by respect which you do not have any. Maybe u should learn to have it someday :)
I think you're confusing sucking up with paying respect.
You were akilled 2 versions ago, right?
And revived within a day, together with another person that was found not guilty after a close look.
Hm, I can't remember the revive.
Courtesy of Bramble? :p
Actually, Bramble was the one that randomly akilled him ;(

ahahaha crit i never mentioned that murder is cheater etc. neither i care :D
Wasn't pointing at you, i was just lazytologin.
darklazytologin (19:13:28 - 03-01)
Link Quote
critlazyloginhidark at 19:06:19 on 03/01:
ites at 19:02:52 on 03/01:
MurderInc at 19:01:46 on 03/01:
ites at 19:00:42 on 03/01:
MurderInc at 18:58:30 on 03/01:
Anonymous at 18:55:34 on 03/01:
MurderInc at 18:46:37 on 03/01:
Anonymous at 18:42:31 on 03/01:
siberia always cries about how anarchy had the bigger pact but lets have a look at this

siberia aeterna colossal rivera bosphorus nazdrovia ancient karadeniz ferocia lusa equestria

vs

anarchy purgatory samyo navaja savagery cosenza (later blackhand)

and also
siberia had info all the time cause of their rat.

so siberia pls stop crying about pacts and fair play. you played as dirty as you can play and im pretty sure you wont be able to create a family on .com without some monkey business like ranking up with other families and stabbing them when you see the opportunity.
So let me get this straight:
- We were facing a family with 30% of all HRs
- Who had 3-4 more bloods.
- (And, by the way, tried to get many more, but was refused.)
- We had 3 bloods all version.
- All of which are still alive.
- None of which were stabbed by us.
- And we played smart by having a source within the enemies top.

And we're the ones who played dirty and should expect suicides? LOL.
like you didnt create a mass pact huh? having a source within the enemies top does not prove that you are smart. it proves anarchy crews idiocy.
siberia goes offline/sh for 6 hours while the mass pact shooting for them. (this must prove that siberia is the best fam with their ONLY 3 bloods LOL)
this kind of answers really fits on you fking cheater :) if admins had any honor they would ban you forever for your dupes/scripts etc. but its all about the money these days... (they will probably ban me for like 4 days cause i tell the truth ) :)))
I've had a single akill in my omerta life. Get a grasp on reality, kid.

darklazytologin at 18:55:22 on 03/01:
You can get them by respect which you do not have any. Maybe u should learn to have it someday :)
I think you're confusing sucking up with paying respect.
You were akilled 2 versions ago, right?
And revived within a day, together with another person that was found not guilty after a close look.
Hm, I can't remember the revive.
Courtesy of Bramble? :p
Actually, Bramble was the one that randomly akilled him ;(

ahahaha crit i never mentioned that murder is cheater etc. neither i care :D