» Menu
» OB/Site News
» Articles
» Barafranca News
No news found. Reset in progress?
 |
|
article
Guardians and Republic are currently being shot by Aeterna and Lusa
Ohana counters, shortly followed by Siyahsancak and Lionsgate.
Ohana ceasefired after making a deal with Aeterna & Lusa that they'd stop firing on Republic.
Rivera joins the counter on Aeterna and Lusa. Psychonymous decides to put even more pressure to it.
As if it was not enough yet, Whitewalkers join the onslaught. They have also decided to aim for Prophecy.
In the early morning Nazdrovia decided to take a shot at Guardians also by joining the attackers side.
The Punisher puts some pressure on the Nazdrovia family by shooting at them.
Ohana counters, shortly followed by Siyahsancak and Lionsgate.
Ohana ceasefired after making a deal with Aeterna & Lusa that they'd stop firing on Republic.
Rivera joins the counter on Aeterna and Lusa. Psychonymous decides to put even more pressure to it.
As if it was not enough yet, Whitewalkers join the onslaught. They have also decided to aim for Prophecy.
In the early morning Nazdrovia decided to take a shot at Guardians also by joining the attackers side.
The Punisher puts some pressure on the Nazdrovia family by shooting at them.
statements
Info or Top Statements contact us in #news
statistics
| War started on: 20:00:04 07-02-2016 | War ended on: 12:07:03 08-02-2016 |
| Bullet difference: -12,500,058 | War duration: 16h 6m |
| Money difference: -$1,271,078,961 | Players died: 93 |
deaths
Dead Families:
Deaths per family:
|
|
2
Solstice (10:41:43 - 08-02)
Anonymous at 22:38:14 on 07/02:
I left many rounds ago so no worries. Now it's just recreational passtime me for me ;)
Anonymous at 22:35:03 on 07/02:
as i said, this is omerta nowadays take it or leave
Anonymous at 22:34:26 on 07/02:
No wonder when you look at how rounds play out. 8 fams countering on 2 fams that were outnumbered to begin with is a good example of what is wrong with this game.
Anonymous at 22:23:48 on 07/02:
well playerbase keeps gettin lower and it never increase so it's just a matter of time be4 this game really is history.
Anonymous at 22:19:46 on 07/02:
leave seems to be the sensible option. This game is getting gayer by each round that passes
Anonymous at 22:17:26 on 07/02:
this is omerta nowadays take it or leave :D
Anonymous at 22:16:33 on 07/02:
Rivera joins the already massive counter on Aeterna and Lusa - rofl
Rivera joins the already massive counter on Aeterna and Lusa - rofl
You used to do this for a living?
My appologies for the way the article was written beforehand, I shouldn't make articles when I'm drunk from Carnival.
Zina at 08:50:50 on 08/02:
Sorry to burst your bubble Johnny but only 2.1 lasted a little over a year all other versions didn't even last for 6 months.
And then the pact thing, first pacts came when .tr players were able ( able yes for the .tr lines were opened to visit the com world.) to play .com server for they made a pact with other families to kill certain other blood/sis families and then the sisterfams and bloodfams thingy went down the drain. and all that happend in versions 2.4 till 2.6 orso then a pact to have was normal like yours or nls or whatever fucking name they giving it.
So yes your memory is not so good nomore.
have a good day.
ZinA` Since 2.0 ;)
Sorry to burst your bubble Johnny but only 2.1 lasted a little over a year all other versions didn't even last for 6 months.
And then the pact thing, first pacts came when .tr players were able ( able yes for the .tr lines were opened to visit the com world.) to play .com server for they made a pact with other families to kill certain other blood/sis families and then the sisterfams and bloodfams thingy went down the drain. and all that happend in versions 2.4 till 2.6 orso then a pact to have was normal like yours or nls or whatever fucking name they giving it.
So yes your memory is not so good nomore.
have a good day.
ZinA` Since 2.0 ;)
15-07 Welcome in 3.0
13-07 Reset announced
From this site in section of 3.0. You're right I was wrong it didn't last over a year, but it lasted a year.
My memory is still pretty good :P
Anonymous (09:43:12 - 08-02)
3.0 lasted over a year, it your memory thats failing mr zina
Anonymous (09:20:21 - 08-02)
Anonymous at 09:10:34 on 08/02:
@ Zina;
be objective, be delikanli.
was the CCCE a tr based pact? Or affinitas ? or Sigma etc etc ?
the first pact which turks had created, MTGU or something like that at 2.4, which fought and lost aganist other pacts. ( MTGU means : Mademki Turksun Goster Urksun )
Conflict co and Affinitas were even becoming bloods in past years. 2 huge pacts. so pacting is your fault not the turks'. we just did what we always do; understand the process, recognize the advantages, improve the process and use it till its done...
we are not inventors, we are developers...
@ Zina;
be objective, be delikanli.
was the CCCE a tr based pact? Or affinitas ? or Sigma etc etc ?
the first pact which turks had created, MTGU or something like that at 2.4, which fought and lost aganist other pacts. ( MTGU means : Mademki Turksun Goster Urksun )
Conflict co and Affinitas were even becoming bloods in past years. 2 huge pacts. so pacting is your fault not the turks'. we just did what we always do; understand the process, recognize the advantages, improve the process and use it till its done...
we are not inventors, we are developers...
you are failers... game is almost dead thanx
Anonymous (09:10:34 - 08-02)
@ Zina;
be objective, be delikanli.
was the CCCE a tr based pact? Or affinitas ? or Sigma etc etc ?
the first pact which turks had created, MTGU or something like that at 2.4, which fought and lost aganist other pacts. ( MTGU means : Mademki Turksun Goster Urksun )
Conflict co and Affinitas were even becoming bloods in past years. 2 huge pacts. so pacting is your fault not the turks'. we just did what we always do; understand the process, recognize the advantages, improve the process and use it till its done...
we are not inventors, we are developers...
be objective, be delikanli.
was the CCCE a tr based pact? Or affinitas ? or Sigma etc etc ?
the first pact which turks had created, MTGU or something like that at 2.4, which fought and lost aganist other pacts. ( MTGU means : Mademki Turksun Goster Urksun )
Conflict co and Affinitas were even becoming bloods in past years. 2 huge pacts. so pacting is your fault not the turks'. we just did what we always do; understand the process, recognize the advantages, improve the process and use it till its done...
we are not inventors, we are developers...
Anonymous (09:01:07 - 08-02)
Bigpapa at 23:11:33 on 07/02:
Well what is interesting is our blood Gambino not helping, because our other blood Ferocia tells them not too. How epic is that.
Even better is that, as of right now, Ferocia Lionsgate and sidifficultname are as1 or so they claim.
And I thought Anarchy was bad.
Indi6_popcorn at 23:07:02 on 07/02:
Well, i always said when you go go with a blast.
Seems a nice move from Aeterna + Lusa, before they where picked 1 by 1.
14 brugs dead may not be much but i am sure it more if they waited...
Still interesting version, although my wishes of a longer run prolly wont happen...
About he counter... its a gangbang but what to do?
It is expected bloods to counter and there is always fams/players farming kills... no news about it and no shame for it also...
Well, i always said when you go go with a blast.
Seems a nice move from Aeterna + Lusa, before they where picked 1 by 1.
14 brugs dead may not be much but i am sure it more if they waited...
Still interesting version, although my wishes of a longer run prolly wont happen...
About he counter... its a gangbang but what to do?
It is expected bloods to counter and there is always fams/players farming kills... no news about it and no shame for it also...
Well what is interesting is our blood Gambino not helping, because our other blood Ferocia tells them not too. How epic is that.
Even better is that, as of right now, Ferocia Lionsgate and sidifficultname are as1 or so they claim.
And I thought Anarchy was bad.
and how was this unexpected again?
Anonymous at 07:01:08 on 08/02:
So you are saying that you werent blood of I&D or later DIG, and only after Talamasca join them, and only cos of talamasca you became blood of DIGIT ? whahahahha you are a clown ROFLMAO
how can you speak of version 2.1 or 2.2 or even 2.3? What was your nickname , or what was your ingames ? You make and came here so badly told a story so many times that I think you stay to believe in your version. Go back to your cave .
Anyway i do agree that wasnt vincitori fault the game style used back those days, and even less nowdays game style.
Johnny at 01:22:01 on 08/02:
I don't suffer from amnesia and I do remember how things here went in the past.
I don't get where does myth of Vinci starting massblooding come from?
You talk about 2,1 when Vinci started, or 2,3 to 2,4 where everyone played in alliance where idd Affinitas was huge? Or you talk about 2,8 where Vinci had 6-7 bloods which was normal for those times?
Or you talk about 2,9 where we had overall 8 bloods, (where never all of them were up at the same time) in version where Vinci was up twice. Now don't forget that during times Omerta was still at it's peak and it had around 10k active players at least.
Or you talk about 3,0 where we had one war against 20+ families? Even in that version we didn't have more than 6 bloods, 7 at the very end cause we blooded Dead Rabbits when version was already decided (Kerberos, Vaffanculo, Gravano, Gambino, Talamasca and later Leviticus and after that we added DIG because Talamasca joined them, Dead Rabbits and Liberta) in version that lasted almost a year. That's 8 families in a year long version. In version that probably had over 100 families up. And for the record we started with 5 bloods, which in that that time was pretty normal number.
Or you talk about 3,1 where we had 4 bloods? Vaffanculo, Gravano, Talamasca, Civella.
Or you talk about 3,2 where again we had 5 bloods on start adding 1 more later on? Conflict, Vaffanculo, Gravano, Liberta, Talamasca and we blooded Presidential after 1st war.
Or we are talking about 3,3 where we had 5 bloods again. Conflict, Marangello, Gravano, Liberta and Venture? Where we ended up killing Venture cause we found out they were making plan to kill us with our bloods.
I didn't play 3,4 but I don't think it went much different.
Most of you talking about pacts here have no clue where that word came from. First group people here called pact was Conflict - Curse - Righelli - Illusion (with some more fams). Those fams were literally making us all look like clowns trying to fight them and fail, that people started calling them pact cause everyone felt powerless in attempts to kill them. That lasted from 2.7 to 2.8a (4 versions, thought they didn't win 2.8).
It's amazing how people here suffer from amnesia and how events actually went. We as Vinci played our own role in pacts, and yes we did use that play style cause it is so effective, but please do not give bullshit here how we started it and this is just reaction to it. Vincitori prior to this version didn't play for 3 years, and you still say families play that way cause Vincitori forced everyone to play that way? Please stop lying to yourself or others. And besides look at versions where Vincitori wasn't shot out of pure fear or hate (2,9), we actually played quite different than most of you remember and talk here.
Anonymous at 00:26:00 on 08/02:Vinci was one of the first fams to start massblood. If they had time after anarchy vs siberia, they would have done so.
I don't suffer from amnesia and I do remember how things here went in the past.
I don't get where does myth of Vinci starting massblooding come from?
You talk about 2,1 when Vinci started, or 2,3 to 2,4 where everyone played in alliance where idd Affinitas was huge? Or you talk about 2,8 where Vinci had 6-7 bloods which was normal for those times?
Or you talk about 2,9 where we had overall 8 bloods, (where never all of them were up at the same time) in version where Vinci was up twice. Now don't forget that during times Omerta was still at it's peak and it had around 10k active players at least.
Or you talk about 3,0 where we had one war against 20+ families? Even in that version we didn't have more than 6 bloods, 7 at the very end cause we blooded Dead Rabbits when version was already decided (Kerberos, Vaffanculo, Gravano, Gambino, Talamasca and later Leviticus and after that we added DIG because Talamasca joined them, Dead Rabbits and Liberta) in version that lasted almost a year. That's 8 families in a year long version. In version that probably had over 100 families up. And for the record we started with 5 bloods, which in that that time was pretty normal number.
Or you talk about 3,1 where we had 4 bloods? Vaffanculo, Gravano, Talamasca, Civella.
Or you talk about 3,2 where again we had 5 bloods on start adding 1 more later on? Conflict, Vaffanculo, Gravano, Liberta, Talamasca and we blooded Presidential after 1st war.
Or we are talking about 3,3 where we had 5 bloods again. Conflict, Marangello, Gravano, Liberta and Venture? Where we ended up killing Venture cause we found out they were making plan to kill us with our bloods.
I didn't play 3,4 but I don't think it went much different.
Most of you talking about pacts here have no clue where that word came from. First group people here called pact was Conflict - Curse - Righelli - Illusion (with some more fams). Those fams were literally making us all look like clowns trying to fight them and fail, that people started calling them pact cause everyone felt powerless in attempts to kill them. That lasted from 2.7 to 2.8a (4 versions, thought they didn't win 2.8).
It's amazing how people here suffer from amnesia and how events actually went. We as Vinci played our own role in pacts, and yes we did use that play style cause it is so effective, but please do not give bullshit here how we started it and this is just reaction to it. Vincitori prior to this version didn't play for 3 years, and you still say families play that way cause Vincitori forced everyone to play that way? Please stop lying to yourself or others. And besides look at versions where Vincitori wasn't shot out of pure fear or hate (2,9), we actually played quite different than most of you remember and talk here.
So you are saying that you werent blood of I&D or later DIG, and only after Talamasca join them, and only cos of talamasca you became blood of DIGIT ? whahahahha you are a clown ROFLMAO
how can you speak of version 2.1 or 2.2 or even 2.3? What was your nickname , or what was your ingames ? You make and came here so badly told a story so many times that I think you stay to believe in your version. Go back to your cave .
Anyway i do agree that wasnt vincitori fault the game style used back those days, and even less nowdays game style.
Sorry to burst your bubble Johnny but only 2.1 lasted a little over a year all other versions didn't even last for 6 months.
And then the pact thing, first pacts came when .tr players were able ( able yes for the .tr lines were opened to visit the com world.) to play .com server for they made a pact with other families to kill certain other blood/sis families and then the sisterfams and bloodfams thingy went down the drain. and all that happend in versions 2.4 till 2.6 orso then a pact to have was normal like yours or nls or whatever fucking name they giving it.
So yes your memory is not so good nomore.
have a good day.
ZinA` Since 2.0 ;)
Anonymous (07:01:08 - 08-02)
Johnny at 01:22:01 on 08/02:
I don't suffer from amnesia and I do remember how things here went in the past.
I don't get where does myth of Vinci starting massblooding come from?
You talk about 2,1 when Vinci started, or 2,3 to 2,4 where everyone played in alliance where idd Affinitas was huge? Or you talk about 2,8 where Vinci had 6-7 bloods which was normal for those times?
Or you talk about 2,9 where we had overall 8 bloods, (where never all of them were up at the same time) in version where Vinci was up twice. Now don't forget that during times Omerta was still at it's peak and it had around 10k active players at least.
Or you talk about 3,0 where we had one war against 20+ families? Even in that version we didn't have more than 6 bloods, 7 at the very end cause we blooded Dead Rabbits when version was already decided (Kerberos, Vaffanculo, Gravano, Gambino, Talamasca and later Leviticus and after that we added DIG because Talamasca joined them, Dead Rabbits and Liberta) in version that lasted almost a year. That's 8 families in a year long version. In version that probably had over 100 families up. And for the record we started with 5 bloods, which in that that time was pretty normal number.
Or you talk about 3,1 where we had 4 bloods? Vaffanculo, Gravano, Talamasca, Civella.
Or you talk about 3,2 where again we had 5 bloods on start adding 1 more later on? Conflict, Vaffanculo, Gravano, Liberta, Talamasca and we blooded Presidential after 1st war.
Or we are talking about 3,3 where we had 5 bloods again. Conflict, Marangello, Gravano, Liberta and Venture? Where we ended up killing Venture cause we found out they were making plan to kill us with our bloods.
I didn't play 3,4 but I don't think it went much different.
Most of you talking about pacts here have no clue where that word came from. First group people here called pact was Conflict - Curse - Righelli - Illusion (with some more fams). Those fams were literally making us all look like clowns trying to fight them and fail, that people started calling them pact cause everyone felt powerless in attempts to kill them. That lasted from 2.7 to 2.8a (4 versions, thought they didn't win 2.8).
It's amazing how people here suffer from amnesia and how events actually went. We as Vinci played our own role in pacts, and yes we did use that play style cause it is so effective, but please do not give bullshit here how we started it and this is just reaction to it. Vincitori prior to this version didn't play for 3 years, and you still say families play that way cause Vincitori forced everyone to play that way? Please stop lying to yourself or others. And besides look at versions where Vincitori wasn't shot out of pure fear or hate (2,9), we actually played quite different than most of you remember and talk here.
Anonymous at 00:26:00 on 08/02:Vinci was one of the first fams to start massblood. If they had time after anarchy vs siberia, they would have done so.
I don't suffer from amnesia and I do remember how things here went in the past.
I don't get where does myth of Vinci starting massblooding come from?
You talk about 2,1 when Vinci started, or 2,3 to 2,4 where everyone played in alliance where idd Affinitas was huge? Or you talk about 2,8 where Vinci had 6-7 bloods which was normal for those times?
Or you talk about 2,9 where we had overall 8 bloods, (where never all of them were up at the same time) in version where Vinci was up twice. Now don't forget that during times Omerta was still at it's peak and it had around 10k active players at least.
Or you talk about 3,0 where we had one war against 20+ families? Even in that version we didn't have more than 6 bloods, 7 at the very end cause we blooded Dead Rabbits when version was already decided (Kerberos, Vaffanculo, Gravano, Gambino, Talamasca and later Leviticus and after that we added DIG because Talamasca joined them, Dead Rabbits and Liberta) in version that lasted almost a year. That's 8 families in a year long version. In version that probably had over 100 families up. And for the record we started with 5 bloods, which in that that time was pretty normal number.
Or you talk about 3,1 where we had 4 bloods? Vaffanculo, Gravano, Talamasca, Civella.
Or you talk about 3,2 where again we had 5 bloods on start adding 1 more later on? Conflict, Vaffanculo, Gravano, Liberta, Talamasca and we blooded Presidential after 1st war.
Or we are talking about 3,3 where we had 5 bloods again. Conflict, Marangello, Gravano, Liberta and Venture? Where we ended up killing Venture cause we found out they were making plan to kill us with our bloods.
I didn't play 3,4 but I don't think it went much different.
Most of you talking about pacts here have no clue where that word came from. First group people here called pact was Conflict - Curse - Righelli - Illusion (with some more fams). Those fams were literally making us all look like clowns trying to fight them and fail, that people started calling them pact cause everyone felt powerless in attempts to kill them. That lasted from 2.7 to 2.8a (4 versions, thought they didn't win 2.8).
It's amazing how people here suffer from amnesia and how events actually went. We as Vinci played our own role in pacts, and yes we did use that play style cause it is so effective, but please do not give bullshit here how we started it and this is just reaction to it. Vincitori prior to this version didn't play for 3 years, and you still say families play that way cause Vincitori forced everyone to play that way? Please stop lying to yourself or others. And besides look at versions where Vincitori wasn't shot out of pure fear or hate (2,9), we actually played quite different than most of you remember and talk here.
So you are saying that you werent blood of I&D or later DIG, and only after Talamasca join them, and only cos of talamasca you became blood of DIGIT ? whahahahha you are a clown ROFLMAO
how can you speak of version 2.1 or 2.2 or even 2.3? What was your nickname , or what was your ingames ? You make and came here so badly told a story so many times that I think you stay to believe in your version. Go back to your cave .
Anyway i do agree that wasnt vincitori fault the game style used back those days, and even less nowdays game style.
Anonymous (06:37:17 - 08-02)
Bigpapa at 23:11:33 on 07/02:
Well what is interesting is our blood Gambino not helping, because our other blood Ferocia tells them not too. How epic is that.
Even better is that, as of right now, Ferocia Lionsgate and sidifficultname are as1 or so they claim.
And I thought Anarchy was bad.
Indi6_popcorn at 23:07:02 on 07/02:
Well, i always said when you go go with a blast.
Seems a nice move from Aeterna + Lusa, before they where picked 1 by 1.
14 brugs dead may not be much but i am sure it more if they waited...
Still interesting version, although my wishes of a longer run prolly wont happen...
About he counter... its a gangbang but what to do?
It is expected bloods to counter and there is always fams/players farming kills... no news about it and no shame for it also...
Well, i always said when you go go with a blast.
Seems a nice move from Aeterna + Lusa, before they where picked 1 by 1.
14 brugs dead may not be much but i am sure it more if they waited...
Still interesting version, although my wishes of a longer run prolly wont happen...
About he counter... its a gangbang but what to do?
It is expected bloods to counter and there is always fams/players farming kills... no news about it and no shame for it also...
Well what is interesting is our blood Gambino not helping, because our other blood Ferocia tells them not too. How epic is that.
Even better is that, as of right now, Ferocia Lionsgate and sidifficultname are as1 or so they claim.
And I thought Anarchy was bad.
and mosyo, could you please tell us how many bloods you had got in total, from the beginning of this version?
as soon as you add new bloods after each war, and wacthed most of their deads, then its normal to die alone...
bANJO at 04:48:44 on 08/02:
I suppose you can make it 4 v 8, I entered myself into the battle so it doesn't look so bad.
Obiwan 08-Feb @ 04:00:59 You failed to kill Obiwan but did some damage, he hit back and did some damage
Please Note I didn't die in BF for the first time 4 versions, But im thinking about offering a Cease Fire :)
MurderInc at 04:20:22 on 08/02:
It's that group of unrelated families again!
Someone compared this to the "Christmas Aftermath" war. The difference is that this is 3v8, whereas the other one was 5v8. Additionally, a large chunk of the counter in that war only started about 10 hours after the start (Siberia, Equestria, I think Nazdrovia). So it was basically 5v5 until then. Which seems about right given the losses on both sides.
Spread the Fun was a cleanup war, no question about that.
It's that group of unrelated families again!
Someone compared this to the "Christmas Aftermath" war. The difference is that this is 3v8, whereas the other one was 5v8. Additionally, a large chunk of the counter in that war only started about 10 hours after the start (Siberia, Equestria, I think Nazdrovia). So it was basically 5v5 until then. Which seems about right given the losses on both sides.
Spread the Fun was a cleanup war, no question about that.
I suppose you can make it 4 v 8, I entered myself into the battle so it doesn't look so bad.
Obiwan 08-Feb @ 04:00:59 You failed to kill Obiwan but did some damage, he hit back and did some damage
Please Note I didn't die in BF for the first time 4 versions, But im thinking about offering a Cease Fire :)
You didnt die on bf for the first time in last 4 versions?
I think I suck :/
And u ruined my sleep.
MurderInc at 04:20:22 on 08/02:
It's that group of unrelated families again!
Someone compared this to the "Christmas Aftermath" war. The difference is that this is 3v8, whereas the other one was 5v8. Additionally, a large chunk of the counter in that war only started about 10 hours after the start (Siberia, Equestria, I think Nazdrovia). So it was basically 5v5 until then. Which seems about right given the losses on both sides.
Spread the Fun was a cleanup war, no question about that.
It's that group of unrelated families again!
Someone compared this to the "Christmas Aftermath" war. The difference is that this is 3v8, whereas the other one was 5v8. Additionally, a large chunk of the counter in that war only started about 10 hours after the start (Siberia, Equestria, I think Nazdrovia). So it was basically 5v5 until then. Which seems about right given the losses on both sides.
Spread the Fun was a cleanup war, no question about that.
I suppose you can make it 4 v 8, I entered myself into the battle so it doesn't look so bad.
Obiwan 08-Feb @ 04:00:59 You failed to kill Obiwan but did some damage, he hit back and did some damage
Please Note I didn't die in BF for the first time 4 versions, But im thinking about offering a Cease Fire :)
It's that group of unrelated families again!
Someone compared this to the "Christmas Aftermath" war. The difference is that this is 3v8, whereas the other one was 5v8. Additionally, a large chunk of the counter in that war only started about 10 hours after the start (Siberia, Equestria, I think Nazdrovia). So it was basically 5v5 until then. Which seems about right given the losses on both sides.
Spread the Fun was a cleanup war, no question about that.
Someone compared this to the "Christmas Aftermath" war. The difference is that this is 3v8, whereas the other one was 5v8. Additionally, a large chunk of the counter in that war only started about 10 hours after the start (Siberia, Equestria, I think Nazdrovia). So it was basically 5v5 until then. Which seems about right given the losses on both sides.
Spread the Fun was a cleanup war, no question about that.
Anonymous (04:09:28 - 08-02)
Redspeert at 03:29:05 on 08/02:
The article has been slightly altered. It will be kept as neutral as possible from now on. Personally I think that this war (as others this version, and versions before where I have been both on the reciving and giving part) was a bit overkill, but articles should be kept neutral.
The article has been slightly altered. It will be kept as neutral as possible from now on. Personally I think that this war (as others this version, and versions before where I have been both on the reciving and giving part) was a bit overkill, but articles should be kept neutral.
Good, about time thank you. This was all getting a bit childish. A news "site" should be for providing news, not for so called reporters to sit there like wannabe Gods judging everyone's decisions. This is a Mafia game and ganging up on others and making moves to get to the top has and always will be a part of it.
The article has been slightly altered. It will be kept as neutral as possible from now on. Personally I think that this war (as others this version, and versions before where I have been both on the reciving and giving part) was a bit overkill, but articles should be kept neutral.
Anonymous (03:06:46 - 08-02)
Anonymous at 02:09:14 on 08/02:
Brave Lionsgate
Brave Lionsgate
But, but... they're not involved!
Anonymous (02:09:14 - 08-02)
Brave Lionsgate
Killerzzz at 01:30:26 on 08/02:
Johnny just give up these guys keep comparing it to old days bloodlists but keep forgetting there were huge number of families in the game that had good numbers of brugliones, so the game could actually take if you had 5/6 families in your bloodship that were in top 10, now if you have 5/6 or even more families out of top 10 as your blood you dominate easily and that is what people fail to see as the big differ from the 2.x versions and how the game is nowdays
Johnny at 01:22:01 on 08/02:
Johnny just give up these guys keep comparing it to old days bloodlists but keep forgetting there were huge number of families in the game that had good numbers of brugliones, so the game could actually take if you had 5/6 families in your bloodship that were in top 10, now if you have 5/6 or even more families out of top 10 as your blood you dominate easily and that is what people fail to see as the big differ from the 2.x versions and how the game is nowdays
killerzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
(K)
Well, i always said when you go go with a blast.
Seems a nice move from Aeterna + Lusa, before they where picked 1 by 1.
14 brugs dead may not be much but i am sure it more if they waited...
Still interesting version, although my wishes of a longer run prolly wont happen...
About he counter... its a gangbang but what to do?
It is expected bloods to counter and there is always fams/players farming kills... no news about it and no shame for it also...
Well what is interesting is our blood Gambino not helping, because our other blood Ferocia tells them not too. How epic is that.
Even better is that, as of right now, Ferocia Lionsgate and sidifficultname are as1 or so they claim.
And I thought Anarchy was bad.
and mosyo, could you please tell us how many bloods you had got in total, from the beginning of this version?
as soon as you add new bloods after each war, and wacthed most of their deads, then its normal to die alone...
We went all in against the pact , sadly from previous war we had only 2 brugs left to shoot :)