everyone bashing on Gambino but Gambino is the only fam who attacked Siberia one on one and two times in a row. so imo they dont deserve those insults.

and they also lose 1 brug during this war thats also another achievement in my point of view, coz siberia could shoot them back since its a 1 vs 1 war, and they didnt let siberia to launch a counter.

btw, did imperium, caliente and phoneix left anarchy ? is it the end of pacts era ?

Thats how we fuck ponnys ... gangbang on the don :D

Yea let your top3 + capo's waste bullets, makes sense

nice thou , as Don of siberia hiding , hours in his villa , we just wanted shoot him empty :D , nothing wrong whit that :P
After that he went in sh for life i geuss :D

https://static1.e621.net/data/5b/38/5b38730c95b145a1b91159373f134941.gif

Im crying.

shhhhhhhhhhht! he is fuckin angry!

oh hi cheater :) how are you doin???

Sorry, my wording was unclear. What I meant was that in a war with counters, not all families are always getting shot by the counering fam. So while the overall ratio might be (like in this case) negative for the attackers after a counter, individual families might still be shooting with worse odds (e.g. no one is countering on Gambino in this case). The fact that not all shooters are online is a non-issue as it applies to both sides, so a 5:1 gangbang is still different from a 2:1 war in relative terms.

We've experimented with various things in the past, including ratios and various visualizations to display them (based on, for example, fam strength). It's just a matter of not having the time or motivation to do it for every war. As an example, all war reports last version were created by one reporter, would you have rather had none at all?

I would also argue that the Tattaglia war was not directly comparable as it was a fight over starting in a city without permission (or so they thought trolol), and at the same time a 1v1 war. You can't blame Anarchy for having the size they had, and you can't expect them not to shoot someone over something like that just because it would be a gangbang. It's all about the small details here. Various families who claim to not be related attacking one family 6 vs 1 is a different thing entirely.

Sadly it is probably too late to start any meaningful moderation on this forum. It has always been toxic, as is this community in general, as we all know. I don't really care about the tone here as long as it doesn't go too far into personal business, and I expect everyone else to do the same.

Actually you might not have seen it but it happens, the missing comes from shooting no more then 15k at the target, in rapid succession as not hitting doesnt activate the 10 min timer, as you can clearly see by there only being 2-3 minutes between each hit. and as said before why suicide 4 accounts if you can actually just drain someone of bullets and then later go in for the kill.

KA in this version, At this point doesnt automaticly mean 60k shots are deaths, in the "perfect oppurtinity part II" war this could be seen very well where people where being hit with 60k by people in much higher overal positions and only losing 2 bgs their suits and around 50% health.
maybe this chances as we come closer to CDC and GF ranks who knows.

I saw you updated the article am not talking about that.
also before i do continue with my point I will thank you and all reporters of this site for your work and time spend on it, am not saying you are in anyway biased in picking your reporters or anything. sad i have to state that out. also with some of the things i read here, i do admit you ALL take a lot of shit that is unfounded in anyway.

Now comming back to my orginal point however.


Vincitori is getting shot by a massive amount of families consisting of Rivera, Ferocia, Guardians, Republic, Siyahsancak and Lionsgate

It's worth noting the odds in this war are as follows:
Bruglione: 5:1 (just about)
Chief: 7,5:1
LC: 3:1

True that if you stack the numbers up like that it is a massive amount of over kill and alot of overkill or so it may seem. As i stated before not every brug chief and lc in the attacking fams shot as that would simple not be able and not just amount of possible shooters, but also actually amount of people able of being online and actually shooting. I do agree with you that it is for the reader to think about this for him or herself.

The reason however i started all these talks is that this is actually what you say to one of the posters on this site. and then in a next say "its quite an outliner cause of the high numbers" apperently forgetting what you said before that, Which was "but in most wars, not everyone is shooting everyone" and ill add not everyone is shooting. Again ill state its for the reader to ponder of this aswell.

The biased comes from the initial reports of the vinci war where the attacking side pretty much got dragged thru the mud, over these numbers, which where introduced only in that war, and where not seen in previous versions, where odds where just as staggering. as i said in my previous post and you compleetly ignore anarchy(60+lc+) VS Tattaglia(whitewalkers) which was a staggering overpowerment aswell did not show these numbers. ill admit they might not have been as high but cant be far off since whitewalkers right now have 19 lc+. This atleast creates a sense of some biasedness in reporting.

I can actually very well discern between what is relevant and what is not, and how to see things in perspective if i might say so myself, what i find to be lacking is you grasping the point, of my point being made.
And what i think is shamefull is that you in your last line resort once again to trying to "degrade" someone by saying they need to go back to kindergarten, and i personally believe you as a moderator of this site should set your self to a highers standard then that. or if you are speaking on personal note on the matter, atleast make it clear that you are doing exactly that.
Alot of forums where moderators partake in converstaion, and if they do so on personal note make that distinction and actually post that.

He was online for a total of 4 attempts now.

Full villa protection, hometown top 10 overall rank/points.

Yeah sure shoot 60k then... why suicide if u got them overpowerd.

war is 1 vs 1

So much THIS!

This site adds a lot to the game and I think the people running it should be given a bit more recognition and a lot less flak for it.

Do I find that there's sometimes a bit of a pro-whatever-family slant in some of the articles? Sure. But would I actually want to do the reporter's job myself? Ugh, rather not; running around interviewing tops just to be a constant target for moaners.

The admins here have said multiple times they wouldn't mind new reporters, so: don't like how reporting is being done? Sign up and contribute to the reports in a constructive manner.

Well, I have most certainly never seen anyone preshoot someone (even while online, for the last two!) with top accounts (Don, Top 3, 2 capos) without doing any damage. I don't think anyone else has either. It's quite cute.

most likely taken from lina :490,014 (Backfire: 430,014)

and they are draining her of bullets, which makes waaaay more sense then hitting her with 60k and prolly suicide 5 accounts of her. But murderinc just got his ass handed to him in this topic and now is looking to trash talk someone else.
even though siberia would most likely do the same thing if roles where reversed.
so who the hell are you calling a noob. idiot?

I updated this article to include the correct ratio hours ago. It is NEGATIVE for the attacking side. I'm on the defending side. How can you possibly use that as an argument for this site being biased?

If I wanted to shut anything down, I would have deleted all comments regarding this matter. I did not. I have no interest in this discussions and the reporters on this site don't have to accept every shit claim and be called names for everything they do here. We do this for free, for the community and there are reporters from all sides, all of which could add or edit anything that is biased or inaccurate. We do not decline any applications from new reporters based on the family they're in.

If you cannot understand that things can be both irrelevant when looked at in isolation and still worth including for the general picture, then I can't help you and suggest you go back to primary school.

Yeah if this page bothers you that much you should perhaps stop reading it.

Sssst Cheater since ...