» Menu
» OB/Site News
» Articles
» Barafranca News
|
article
Siberia+ is under attack by Enfoire+, Prophecy and Albireo.
Provenzano+ and Nazdrovia are countering on Enfoire+. Unholy was ready and shoot back at Provenzano.
Gambino+ is joining the counter on Enfoire. Mauryan, with support from Guantanamo, decides to go for round two against Albireo. Sangreal joins against Albireo later on.
Favians joined the original attackers against Siberia, while Vetta are now targeting both Siberia and Sangreal.
It looks like Enfoire got hijacked during the night. All highranks were kicked and the hijackers put the following picture on their family page:
The war almost came to a halt after 2 days, but on the 5th day, we're seeing a new offensive by Siberia+ and Gambino+ against Prophecy.
Enfoire Enfo Prophecy → Siberia
Albireo → Fatoslocos
Provenzano Deluccio Hattrickelli Nazdrovia → Enfoire Enfo
Unholy → Provenzano
Gambino Onibmag → Enfoire Enfo
Mauryan Guantanamo → Albireo
Sangreal → Albireo
Favians → Siberia
Vetta → Siberia Sangreal
Gambino Onibmag → Unholy
Provenzano+ and Nazdrovia are countering on Enfoire+. Unholy was ready and shoot back at Provenzano.
Gambino+ is joining the counter on Enfoire. Mauryan, with support from Guantanamo, decides to go for round two against Albireo. Sangreal joins against Albireo later on.
Favians joined the original attackers against Siberia, while Vetta are now targeting both Siberia and Sangreal.
It looks like Enfoire got hijacked during the night. All highranks were kicked and the hijackers put the following picture on their family page:
The war almost came to a halt after 2 days, but on the 5th day, we're seeing a new offensive by Siberia+ and Gambino+ against Prophecy.
Enfoire Enfo Prophecy → Siberia
Albireo → Fatoslocos
Provenzano Deluccio Hattrickelli Nazdrovia → Enfoire Enfo
Unholy → Provenzano
Gambino Onibmag → Enfoire Enfo
Mauryan Guantanamo → Albireo
Sangreal → Albireo
Favians → Siberia
Vetta → Siberia Sangreal
Gambino Onibmag → Unholy
statistics
War started on: 17:58:03 31-07-2015 | War ended on: 08:43:02 06-08-2015 |
Bullet difference: -15,625,487 | War duration: 5d 14h 44m |
Money difference: -$955,670,474 | Players died: 400 |
deaths
Dead Families:
Deaths per family:
|
|
Anonymous (22:08:54 - 05-08)
Anonymous at 22:01:37 on 05/08:
Hellooooo Any news writer online ? allready 2 wars and no news reports. Saldamente got shot and now prophecy is being raped
Hellooooo Any news writer online ? allready 2 wars and no news reports. Saldamente got shot and now prophecy is being raped
Anonymous (22:01:37 - 05-08)
Hellooooo Any news writer online ? allready 2 wars and no news reports. Saldamente got shot and now prophecy is being raped
Anonymous (22:01:02 - 05-08)
Anonymous at 21:46:58 on 05/08:
What about them... lol..
They will die in this war or get raped in another.
Anonymous at 21:20:16 on 05/08:
what about favians?
Anonymous at 21:15:53 on 05/08:
no bloods :D all dead
Anonymous at 21:14:17 on 05/08:
whos prophecy's bloods?
tao at 21:00:02 on 05/08:
Bing bang
Bing bang
no bloods :D all dead
What about them... lol..
They will die in this war or get raped in another.
Anonymous (21:46:58 - 05-08)
Anonymous at 21:20:16 on 05/08:
what about favians?
Anonymous at 21:15:53 on 05/08:
no bloods :D all dead
Anonymous at 21:14:17 on 05/08:
whos prophecy's bloods?
tao at 21:00:02 on 05/08:
Bing bang
Bing bang
no bloods :D all dead
What about them... lol..
They will die in this war or get raped in another.
Anonymous (21:20:16 - 05-08)
Anonymous at 21:15:53 on 05/08:
no bloods :D all dead
Anonymous at 21:14:17 on 05/08:
whos prophecy's bloods?
tao at 21:00:02 on 05/08:
Bing bang
Bing bang
no bloods :D all dead
Anonymous (21:15:53 - 05-08)
Anonymous at 21:14:17 on 05/08:
whos prophecy's bloods?
tao at 21:00:02 on 05/08:
Bing bang
Bing bang
no bloods :D all dead
Anonymous (21:46:55 - 03-08)
Anonymous at 14:06:00 on 03/08:
7red vs 11green
1452p loss vs 683p loss
pwned?
7red vs 11green
1452p loss vs 683p loss
pwned?
Anonymous (16:12:05 - 03-08)
Anonymous at 09:20:15 on 03/08:
Look profile azhorahai...
Anonymous at 08:24:13 on 03/08:
nice try
Anonymous at 06:36:13 on 03/08:
Your graphic isnt right. Gambi+ shot on us unholy also. We shot at them back.
Your graphic isnt right. Gambi+ shot on us unholy also. We shot at them back.
nice try
Look profile azhorahai...
ye is dead
Anonymous (14:03:41 - 03-08)
MurderInc at 13:42:34 on 03/08:
That's one of those cases where a) both families were already pre-hired on each other, b) both started shooting almost simultaneously. I'd say ↔ makes sense here, while Unholy started shooting alone, with Provenzano starting to shoot back at least 30 minutes later, and Gambino+ way later (next day? can't remember).
You could argue it would've made sense to use ↔ for the initial attack on Siberia since we were pre-hired on some of the shooters, but then again we didn't get to shoot back much in the first 30 minutes or so (maybe 3 shots?), since most accounts that were online got hit. Doesn't really matter much anyway, does it?
I'd like to change the article format more to what some online news sites do nowadays with live tickers, I think that makes more sense for this medium. Otherwise you just get the same placeholder text blabla with over 9000 variations of "gangsters started shooting each other".
That's not really possible to do properly with the software we have now though, so it's more of a long-term plan.
Anonymous at 13:33:18 on 03/08:
"It seems we're slowly heading to the main act, with Colossal+ opening fire on Mauryan.
Mauryan was expecting the attack and shoot right back at the attackers.
Colossal Tugra Vetta ↔ Mauryan"
it seems two different sentences and ↔..
btw u should add "timeline" for a war. so it will be better for us
MurderInc at 13:25:52 on 03/08:
It's generally used when two families open fire simultaneously or when it's hard to determine who started.
Anonymous at 13:21:54 on 03/08:
whats the difference between ↔ and →?
shoot back means ↔?
just check previous war article..
whats the difference between ↔ and →?
shoot back means ↔?
just check previous war article..
"It seems we're slowly heading to the main act, with Colossal+ opening fire on Mauryan.
Mauryan was expecting the attack and shoot right back at the attackers.
Colossal Tugra Vetta ↔ Mauryan"
it seems two different sentences and ↔..
btw u should add "timeline" for a war. so it will be better for us
You could argue it would've made sense to use ↔ for the initial attack on Siberia since we were pre-hired on some of the shooters, but then again we didn't get to shoot back much in the first 30 minutes or so (maybe 3 shots?), since most accounts that were online got hit. Doesn't really matter much anyway, does it?
I'd like to change the article format more to what some online news sites do nowadays with live tickers, I think that makes more sense for this medium. Otherwise you just get the same placeholder text blabla with over 9000 variations of "gangsters started shooting each other".
That's not really possible to do properly with the software we have now though, so it's more of a long-term plan.
vote can be like that "whos attacker(s)?" so you dont have to see bullshit comments on the article.
ps: maybe possible for long-term plan
MurderInc (13:42:34 - 03-08)
Anonymous at 13:33:18 on 03/08:
"It seems we're slowly heading to the main act, with Colossal+ opening fire on Mauryan.
Mauryan was expecting the attack and shoot right back at the attackers.
Colossal Tugra Vetta ↔ Mauryan"
it seems two different sentences and ↔..
btw u should add "timeline" for a war. so it will be better for us
MurderInc at 13:25:52 on 03/08:
It's generally used when two families open fire simultaneously or when it's hard to determine who started.
Anonymous at 13:21:54 on 03/08:
whats the difference between ↔ and →?
shoot back means ↔?
just check previous war article..
whats the difference between ↔ and →?
shoot back means ↔?
just check previous war article..
"It seems we're slowly heading to the main act, with Colossal+ opening fire on Mauryan.
Mauryan was expecting the attack and shoot right back at the attackers.
Colossal Tugra Vetta ↔ Mauryan"
it seems two different sentences and ↔..
btw u should add "timeline" for a war. so it will be better for us
You could argue it would've made sense to use ↔ for the initial attack on Siberia since we were pre-hired on some of the shooters, but then again we didn't get to shoot back much in the first 30 minutes or so (maybe 3 shots?), since most accounts that were online got hit. Doesn't really matter much anyway, does it?
I'd like to change the article format more to what some online news sites do nowadays with live tickers, I think that makes more sense for this medium. Otherwise you just get the same placeholder text blabla with over 9000 variations of "gangsters started shooting each other".
That's not really possible to do properly with the software we have now though, so it's more of a long-term plan.
Anonymous (13:33:18 - 03-08)
MurderInc at 13:25:52 on 03/08:
It's generally used when two families open fire simultaneously or when it's hard to determine who started.
Anonymous at 13:21:54 on 03/08:
whats the difference between ↔ and →?
shoot back means ↔?
just check previous war article..
whats the difference between ↔ and →?
shoot back means ↔?
just check previous war article..
"It seems we're slowly heading to the main act, with Colossal+ opening fire on Mauryan.
Mauryan was expecting the attack and shoot right back at the attackers.
Colossal Tugra Vetta ↔ Mauryan"
it seems two different sentences and ↔..
btw u should add "timeline" for a war. so it will be better for us
MurderInc (13:25:52 - 03-08)
Anonymous at 13:21:54 on 03/08:
whats the difference between ↔ and →?
shoot back means ↔?
just check previous war article..
whats the difference between ↔ and →?
shoot back means ↔?
just check previous war article..