» Menu
» OB/Site News
» Articles
 |
» Barafranca News
 |
|
article
After a day full of rumours the streets of Omerta are filling up with gangsters from a large variety of families...
Word on the street was that Provenzano+ and their bloods Leviticus & Indelicato had hired detectives on Aeterna+ and vice versa.
Faffie, Gambino & Alcatraz are the first ones to pull their triggers and are targeting Indelicato.
Only moments later, Provenzano+ Krays and Legends open fire on Aeterna+. Five minutes later Aeterna's respone is visible on the statistics page.
Half an hour later we see a new wave of gangsters catching bullets.
More gangsters from Aeterna and Lusa, this time aided by Ferrante, are shooting at Provenzano & Hattrickelli.
Simultaneously Empire & Marazzino open fire on Ataraxia.
All this shooting has proven insufficient to make a serious dent in Aeterna+…. therefore Impact, Kurosawa & Gravano are pointing their tommies towards Aeterna as well.
To save their blood from being shot down, Lusa Empire and Ferrante again pick up their tommy guns, this time aiming towards Impact.
Kurosawa and Gravano continue to battle Aeterna+ to the break of dawn.
Word on the street was that Provenzano+ and their bloods Leviticus & Indelicato had hired detectives on Aeterna+ and vice versa.
Faffie, Gambino & Alcatraz are the first ones to pull their triggers and are targeting Indelicato.
Only moments later, Provenzano+ Krays and Legends open fire on Aeterna+. Five minutes later Aeterna's respone is visible on the statistics page.
Half an hour later we see a new wave of gangsters catching bullets.
More gangsters from Aeterna and Lusa, this time aided by Ferrante, are shooting at Provenzano & Hattrickelli.
Simultaneously Empire & Marazzino open fire on Ataraxia.
All this shooting has proven insufficient to make a serious dent in Aeterna+…. therefore Impact, Kurosawa & Gravano are pointing their tommies towards Aeterna as well.
To save their blood from being shot down, Lusa Empire and Ferrante again pick up their tommy guns, this time aiming towards Impact.
Kurosawa and Gravano continue to battle Aeterna+ to the break of dawn.
statements
Saros`away (Aeterna top): "Well that was amusing"
statistics
| War started on: 19:54:03 17-12-2013 | War ended on: 03:17:02 19-12-2013 |
| Bullet difference: -88,582,225 | War duration: 1d 7h 22m |
| Money difference: -$5,023,653,676 | Players died: 850 |
deaths
Dead Families:
Deaths per family:
|
|
0
Nevady (09:08:03 - 20-12)
Saros`away, ma nigga ma nigga. :D;d:D
Solstice (16:11:05 - 19-12)
The way the game is set-up isn't right. I read a lot of complaints about blooding, towards us and towards the 3 so-called pacts. But you can't blame the players for the way the rules of the game have changed. It used to be about building your family, expanding power with them and gaining respect, then when the version got reset the other players kinda determined for themselves who they thought was the best family of that version, which for some could very well be a family that didn't even got to finish. It got turned into a race to the finishline, a finishline that is determined by the ROM and the winner by the Hall Of Fame. Clear enough families, remain standing, kill the game and you are victorious. Players and tops just do their best to be on the winning side, for which you can't blame them imo.
You see the same thing in other games. Travian f.e. In the beginning of that game it's all about building your town's, getting a strong account, get into a good alliance. You get into fights with other players and alliances about resources and you determine those fights with the force of weapons. Very much the way you used to do back a long way in omerta. Then there's an endgame where you have to build something(forgot what) and people start ganging up to finish in time. Which is pretty comparable to the pacting and gangraping in omerta. Smaller alliances get raped and killed for resources by megapacts, the same way smaller fams get raped for ks on omerta. In Travian aswell as omerta it's that endgame that kills all the fun for most of the people.
Imo, what should be done, is remove that endgame. Remove the Hall Of Fame, remove the ROM, reset at given times(f.e. march and september of each year) and let the major public once again decide for themselves who ranked and fought best. That and implement some things that make reranking easier, like ks-kills for lowranks and the plan where a dc gets added to obay everytime a player dies.
You see the same thing in other games. Travian f.e. In the beginning of that game it's all about building your town's, getting a strong account, get into a good alliance. You get into fights with other players and alliances about resources and you determine those fights with the force of weapons. Very much the way you used to do back a long way in omerta. Then there's an endgame where you have to build something(forgot what) and people start ganging up to finish in time. Which is pretty comparable to the pacting and gangraping in omerta. Smaller alliances get raped and killed for resources by megapacts, the same way smaller fams get raped for ks on omerta. In Travian aswell as omerta it's that endgame that kills all the fun for most of the people.
Imo, what should be done, is remove that endgame. Remove the Hall Of Fame, remove the ROM, reset at given times(f.e. march and september of each year) and let the major public once again decide for themselves who ranked and fought best. That and implement some things that make reranking easier, like ks-kills for lowranks and the plan where a dc gets added to obay everytime a player dies.
Now it's the part of the christmas carol when mrs. clause walks around naked with only cowboy boots on.
Only faggots are dissapointed with my post, you might see a few eventualy....
Only faggots are dissapointed with my post, you might see a few eventualy....
Cless (02:38:53 - 19-12)
Anonymous at 23:38:25 on 18/12:
dothemathty.
Malady'Lazytologin at 23:36:52 on 18/12:
ahahah just dont. little cute anon
Anonymous at 20:19:37 on 18/12:
ganging up entire omerta? you and your gaypact+gayernonshoots = 65% of omerta.
Saros`away at 19:35:55 on 18/12:
Don't be sad that your little plan didn't work (ganging up entire omerta). I know it probably hurts, but it's all good my friend, time heals all wounds.
But when you do decide to mindlessly bash in public, atleast use some facts to back you up next time.
`Donalo`Sixx at 19:20:36 on 18/12:
lol saros...Aeterna is most shameless project iv ever seen in Omerta. When Conflict and Vinci blooded that was the equivalent to you and faffie being bloods this version. Aeterna then went about 10 steps past that mark having something like 8 of top 10 in your bloodlist (including yourself) including non shoot with Impact and Gravano. You can call me mad because we died if you want or so. The game is too small for such faggotry and I don't see what you are so proud of...Well done
Saros`away at 18:01:32 on 18/12:
Oh, you're still going on about this? That's cute.
You don't have to agree you know, nobody is asking for your permission. We did what we did with reasons known to us. I see you are talking like you're fully aware of all connections/bloodings/deals going on, believe me, you're not.
'The way you did is laughable' 'Ask any any top of family not blooded to you'
And we should do that because? If there are families working with us not agreeing with what we do they have to do only 1 simple thing and that is /q AnyAeternaTop.
Don't get me wrong, you make a few valid points, but it's very easy to whine and complain about stuff when you aren't actually involved in matters. If it really bothers you so much, bring Vincitori back next version and we will see how you handle it, or are you going to claim now that the 3.3 version wasn't laughable either?
It beats writing endless essays from some kind of high horse when you have been gone for a long time, barely know what's going on, yet still feel righteous enough to QQ about 'the state of the game' just because you had a fam once upon a time.
Johnny at 17:16:50 on 18/12:
I am not anonymous but your points are rather weak.
Being member of Ferrante, Ferrante was never below 13 either in game or on ob news. In fact only time when Ferrante was below 11 was when Jannisary took them over for around day or two. Empire was also top 10 most of the time, same as Lusa (top 10 or around 10), so if you didn't blood top 10 fams you blooded top 15 fams for sure, cause not one of fams you blooded ever fell below number 15.
Also don't take this wrong, but with bloodings you guys did it is insulting to call others pact. Ascencion had 2 bloods when you killed em, and 2 sister fams of who neither one was in top 20 families, and their bloods had only 1 family in top 10 (Jannisary) if we count Ferrante as not top 10 which you do. Again I don't think Justice alliance is good for game, but calling them + Ascencion (+Marazzino?) pact after bloodings you guys did is laughable.
If you're so fast to throw word pact around, name one that was present in this version that you did not blood to? Gravano one - you pretty much destroyed it with blooding 2 old families of it. Turk pact - you blooded Marazzino from there. Only possible ''pact'' you weren't blooded to was Levi - Indelicato - Provenzano. Also any of these ''pacts'' had less bloods in top 15 (I wont say top 10 on purpose) than you. In fact there wasn't any other family besides Aeterna that had more families related to them in top 10 or top 15 from start of the version.
You won version fair and square, but way you did it is laughable to anyone who played this game long enough. Ask any top of family not blooded to you (actually I am sure some that are blooded to you think same just wont say it openly), what they think about your bloodings.
Johnx at 16:58:19 on 18/12:
I said that they weren't top 10 before wars started to happen, which they both were and weren't. When Aeterna blooded them they weren't in top 10, also ascension was part of a pact, count those together and you will see their have quite a lot of strenght, more than some of the other top 10 fams.
* hits the watch
check, your turn
I said that they weren't top 10 before wars started to happen, which they both were and weren't. When Aeterna blooded them they weren't in top 10, also ascension was part of a pact, count those together and you will see their have quite a lot of strenght, more than some of the other top 10 fams.
* hits the watch
check, your turn
I am not anonymous but your points are rather weak.
Being member of Ferrante, Ferrante was never below 13 either in game or on ob news. In fact only time when Ferrante was below 11 was when Jannisary took them over for around day or two. Empire was also top 10 most of the time, same as Lusa (top 10 or around 10), so if you didn't blood top 10 fams you blooded top 15 fams for sure, cause not one of fams you blooded ever fell below number 15.
Also don't take this wrong, but with bloodings you guys did it is insulting to call others pact. Ascencion had 2 bloods when you killed em, and 2 sister fams of who neither one was in top 20 families, and their bloods had only 1 family in top 10 (Jannisary) if we count Ferrante as not top 10 which you do. Again I don't think Justice alliance is good for game, but calling them + Ascencion (+Marazzino?) pact after bloodings you guys did is laughable.
If you're so fast to throw word pact around, name one that was present in this version that you did not blood to? Gravano one - you pretty much destroyed it with blooding 2 old families of it. Turk pact - you blooded Marazzino from there. Only possible ''pact'' you weren't blooded to was Levi - Indelicato - Provenzano. Also any of these ''pacts'' had less bloods in top 15 (I wont say top 10 on purpose) than you. In fact there wasn't any other family besides Aeterna that had more families related to them in top 10 or top 15 from start of the version.
You won version fair and square, but way you did it is laughable to anyone who played this game long enough. Ask any top of family not blooded to you (actually I am sure some that are blooded to you think same just wont say it openly), what they think about your bloodings.
Oh, you're still going on about this? That's cute.
You don't have to agree you know, nobody is asking for your permission. We did what we did with reasons known to us. I see you are talking like you're fully aware of all connections/bloodings/deals going on, believe me, you're not.
'The way you did is laughable' 'Ask any any top of family not blooded to you'
And we should do that because? If there are families working with us not agreeing with what we do they have to do only 1 simple thing and that is /q AnyAeternaTop.
Don't get me wrong, you make a few valid points, but it's very easy to whine and complain about stuff when you aren't actually involved in matters. If it really bothers you so much, bring Vincitori back next version and we will see how you handle it, or are you going to claim now that the 3.3 version wasn't laughable either?
It beats writing endless essays from some kind of high horse when you have been gone for a long time, barely know what's going on, yet still feel righteous enough to QQ about 'the state of the game' just because you had a fam once upon a time.
lol saros...Aeterna is most shameless project iv ever seen in Omerta. When Conflict and Vinci blooded that was the equivalent to you and faffie being bloods this version. Aeterna then went about 10 steps past that mark having something like 8 of top 10 in your bloodlist (including yourself) including non shoot with Impact and Gravano. You can call me mad because we died if you want or so. The game is too small for such faggotry and I don't see what you are so proud of...Well done
Don't be sad that your little plan didn't work (ganging up entire omerta). I know it probably hurts, but it's all good my friend, time heals all wounds.
But when you do decide to mindlessly bash in public, atleast use some facts to back you up next time.
ganging up entire omerta? you and your gaypact+gayernonshoots = 65% of omerta.
ahahah just dont. little cute anon
dothemathty.
We win again, people cry again. I never cried when I was on the losing side, and I've been there too, naturally. Accept your loss this time, appearantly we of Aeterna made the smarter moves this version, just stop making up excuses like us blooding up with 'only' top 10 fams and the likes. Welcome to the mobster world, where all methods are legit to reach the top (again).
Good luck next time!
Anonymous (23:41:16 - 18-12)
Dogukanforgotmypw at 20:34:24 on 18/12:
Some of the losing side lost this war before the war ever started. When they made plan together with Aeterna against two significant powers who are not blooded or related with Aeterna and who are not big enough to be a threat to you. Without thinking what's going to happen in future while Aeterna stood there with all it's power. How shortsighted of you...
Now it seems you are outnumbered huh? Such a shame...
But at least some of you died/suicided with honor. Well good for you, perhaps you will be knighted and given titles from some Royalty because of your personality. But nothing in this game, because what this game needs is wit.
Some of the losing side lost this war before the war ever started. When they made plan together with Aeterna against two significant powers who are not blooded or related with Aeterna and who are not big enough to be a threat to you. Without thinking what's going to happen in future while Aeterna stood there with all it's power. How shortsighted of you...
Now it seems you are outnumbered huh? Such a shame...
But at least some of you died/suicided with honor. Well good for you, perhaps you will be knighted and given titles from some Royalty because of your personality. But nothing in this game, because what this game needs is wit.
isn't you rfam like dead, yet again? xd
Anonymous (23:38:25 - 18-12)
Malady'Lazytologin at 23:36:52 on 18/12:
ahahah just dont. little cute anon
Anonymous at 20:19:37 on 18/12:
ganging up entire omerta? you and your gaypact+gayernonshoots = 65% of omerta.
Saros`away at 19:35:55 on 18/12:
Don't be sad that your little plan didn't work (ganging up entire omerta). I know it probably hurts, but it's all good my friend, time heals all wounds.
But when you do decide to mindlessly bash in public, atleast use some facts to back you up next time.
`Donalo`Sixx at 19:20:36 on 18/12:
lol saros...Aeterna is most shameless project iv ever seen in Omerta. When Conflict and Vinci blooded that was the equivalent to you and faffie being bloods this version. Aeterna then went about 10 steps past that mark having something like 8 of top 10 in your bloodlist (including yourself) including non shoot with Impact and Gravano. You can call me mad because we died if you want or so. The game is too small for such faggotry and I don't see what you are so proud of...Well done
Saros`away at 18:01:32 on 18/12:
Oh, you're still going on about this? That's cute.
You don't have to agree you know, nobody is asking for your permission. We did what we did with reasons known to us. I see you are talking like you're fully aware of all connections/bloodings/deals going on, believe me, you're not.
'The way you did is laughable' 'Ask any any top of family not blooded to you'
And we should do that because? If there are families working with us not agreeing with what we do they have to do only 1 simple thing and that is /q AnyAeternaTop.
Don't get me wrong, you make a few valid points, but it's very easy to whine and complain about stuff when you aren't actually involved in matters. If it really bothers you so much, bring Vincitori back next version and we will see how you handle it, or are you going to claim now that the 3.3 version wasn't laughable either?
It beats writing endless essays from some kind of high horse when you have been gone for a long time, barely know what's going on, yet still feel righteous enough to QQ about 'the state of the game' just because you had a fam once upon a time.
Johnny at 17:16:50 on 18/12:
I am not anonymous but your points are rather weak.
Being member of Ferrante, Ferrante was never below 13 either in game or on ob news. In fact only time when Ferrante was below 11 was when Jannisary took them over for around day or two. Empire was also top 10 most of the time, same as Lusa (top 10 or around 10), so if you didn't blood top 10 fams you blooded top 15 fams for sure, cause not one of fams you blooded ever fell below number 15.
Also don't take this wrong, but with bloodings you guys did it is insulting to call others pact. Ascencion had 2 bloods when you killed em, and 2 sister fams of who neither one was in top 20 families, and their bloods had only 1 family in top 10 (Jannisary) if we count Ferrante as not top 10 which you do. Again I don't think Justice alliance is good for game, but calling them + Ascencion (+Marazzino?) pact after bloodings you guys did is laughable.
If you're so fast to throw word pact around, name one that was present in this version that you did not blood to? Gravano one - you pretty much destroyed it with blooding 2 old families of it. Turk pact - you blooded Marazzino from there. Only possible ''pact'' you weren't blooded to was Levi - Indelicato - Provenzano. Also any of these ''pacts'' had less bloods in top 15 (I wont say top 10 on purpose) than you. In fact there wasn't any other family besides Aeterna that had more families related to them in top 10 or top 15 from start of the version.
You won version fair and square, but way you did it is laughable to anyone who played this game long enough. Ask any top of family not blooded to you (actually I am sure some that are blooded to you think same just wont say it openly), what they think about your bloodings.
Johnx at 16:58:19 on 18/12:
I said that they weren't top 10 before wars started to happen, which they both were and weren't. When Aeterna blooded them they weren't in top 10, also ascension was part of a pact, count those together and you will see their have quite a lot of strenght, more than some of the other top 10 fams.
* hits the watch
check, your turn
I said that they weren't top 10 before wars started to happen, which they both were and weren't. When Aeterna blooded them they weren't in top 10, also ascension was part of a pact, count those together and you will see their have quite a lot of strenght, more than some of the other top 10 fams.
* hits the watch
check, your turn
I am not anonymous but your points are rather weak.
Being member of Ferrante, Ferrante was never below 13 either in game or on ob news. In fact only time when Ferrante was below 11 was when Jannisary took them over for around day or two. Empire was also top 10 most of the time, same as Lusa (top 10 or around 10), so if you didn't blood top 10 fams you blooded top 15 fams for sure, cause not one of fams you blooded ever fell below number 15.
Also don't take this wrong, but with bloodings you guys did it is insulting to call others pact. Ascencion had 2 bloods when you killed em, and 2 sister fams of who neither one was in top 20 families, and their bloods had only 1 family in top 10 (Jannisary) if we count Ferrante as not top 10 which you do. Again I don't think Justice alliance is good for game, but calling them + Ascencion (+Marazzino?) pact after bloodings you guys did is laughable.
If you're so fast to throw word pact around, name one that was present in this version that you did not blood to? Gravano one - you pretty much destroyed it with blooding 2 old families of it. Turk pact - you blooded Marazzino from there. Only possible ''pact'' you weren't blooded to was Levi - Indelicato - Provenzano. Also any of these ''pacts'' had less bloods in top 15 (I wont say top 10 on purpose) than you. In fact there wasn't any other family besides Aeterna that had more families related to them in top 10 or top 15 from start of the version.
You won version fair and square, but way you did it is laughable to anyone who played this game long enough. Ask any top of family not blooded to you (actually I am sure some that are blooded to you think same just wont say it openly), what they think about your bloodings.
Oh, you're still going on about this? That's cute.
You don't have to agree you know, nobody is asking for your permission. We did what we did with reasons known to us. I see you are talking like you're fully aware of all connections/bloodings/deals going on, believe me, you're not.
'The way you did is laughable' 'Ask any any top of family not blooded to you'
And we should do that because? If there are families working with us not agreeing with what we do they have to do only 1 simple thing and that is /q AnyAeternaTop.
Don't get me wrong, you make a few valid points, but it's very easy to whine and complain about stuff when you aren't actually involved in matters. If it really bothers you so much, bring Vincitori back next version and we will see how you handle it, or are you going to claim now that the 3.3 version wasn't laughable either?
It beats writing endless essays from some kind of high horse when you have been gone for a long time, barely know what's going on, yet still feel righteous enough to QQ about 'the state of the game' just because you had a fam once upon a time.
lol saros...Aeterna is most shameless project iv ever seen in Omerta. When Conflict and Vinci blooded that was the equivalent to you and faffie being bloods this version. Aeterna then went about 10 steps past that mark having something like 8 of top 10 in your bloodlist (including yourself) including non shoot with Impact and Gravano. You can call me mad because we died if you want or so. The game is too small for such faggotry and I don't see what you are so proud of...Well done
Don't be sad that your little plan didn't work (ganging up entire omerta). I know it probably hurts, but it's all good my friend, time heals all wounds.
But when you do decide to mindlessly bash in public, atleast use some facts to back you up next time.
ganging up entire omerta? you and your gaypact+gayernonshoots = 65% of omerta.
ahahah just dont. little cute anon
dothemathty.
Malady'Lazytologin (23:36:52 - 18-12)
Anonymous at 20:19:37 on 18/12:
ganging up entire omerta? you and your gaypact+gayernonshoots = 65% of omerta.
Saros`away at 19:35:55 on 18/12:
Don't be sad that your little plan didn't work (ganging up entire omerta). I know it probably hurts, but it's all good my friend, time heals all wounds.
But when you do decide to mindlessly bash in public, atleast use some facts to back you up next time.
`Donalo`Sixx at 19:20:36 on 18/12:
lol saros...Aeterna is most shameless project iv ever seen in Omerta. When Conflict and Vinci blooded that was the equivalent to you and faffie being bloods this version. Aeterna then went about 10 steps past that mark having something like 8 of top 10 in your bloodlist (including yourself) including non shoot with Impact and Gravano. You can call me mad because we died if you want or so. The game is too small for such faggotry and I don't see what you are so proud of...Well done
Saros`away at 18:01:32 on 18/12:
Oh, you're still going on about this? That's cute.
You don't have to agree you know, nobody is asking for your permission. We did what we did with reasons known to us. I see you are talking like you're fully aware of all connections/bloodings/deals going on, believe me, you're not.
'The way you did is laughable' 'Ask any any top of family not blooded to you'
And we should do that because? If there are families working with us not agreeing with what we do they have to do only 1 simple thing and that is /q AnyAeternaTop.
Don't get me wrong, you make a few valid points, but it's very easy to whine and complain about stuff when you aren't actually involved in matters. If it really bothers you so much, bring Vincitori back next version and we will see how you handle it, or are you going to claim now that the 3.3 version wasn't laughable either?
It beats writing endless essays from some kind of high horse when you have been gone for a long time, barely know what's going on, yet still feel righteous enough to QQ about 'the state of the game' just because you had a fam once upon a time.
Johnny at 17:16:50 on 18/12:
I am not anonymous but your points are rather weak.
Being member of Ferrante, Ferrante was never below 13 either in game or on ob news. In fact only time when Ferrante was below 11 was when Jannisary took them over for around day or two. Empire was also top 10 most of the time, same as Lusa (top 10 or around 10), so if you didn't blood top 10 fams you blooded top 15 fams for sure, cause not one of fams you blooded ever fell below number 15.
Also don't take this wrong, but with bloodings you guys did it is insulting to call others pact. Ascencion had 2 bloods when you killed em, and 2 sister fams of who neither one was in top 20 families, and their bloods had only 1 family in top 10 (Jannisary) if we count Ferrante as not top 10 which you do. Again I don't think Justice alliance is good for game, but calling them + Ascencion (+Marazzino?) pact after bloodings you guys did is laughable.
If you're so fast to throw word pact around, name one that was present in this version that you did not blood to? Gravano one - you pretty much destroyed it with blooding 2 old families of it. Turk pact - you blooded Marazzino from there. Only possible ''pact'' you weren't blooded to was Levi - Indelicato - Provenzano. Also any of these ''pacts'' had less bloods in top 15 (I wont say top 10 on purpose) than you. In fact there wasn't any other family besides Aeterna that had more families related to them in top 10 or top 15 from start of the version.
You won version fair and square, but way you did it is laughable to anyone who played this game long enough. Ask any top of family not blooded to you (actually I am sure some that are blooded to you think same just wont say it openly), what they think about your bloodings.
Johnx at 16:58:19 on 18/12:
I said that they weren't top 10 before wars started to happen, which they both were and weren't. When Aeterna blooded them they weren't in top 10, also ascension was part of a pact, count those together and you will see their have quite a lot of strenght, more than some of the other top 10 fams.
* hits the watch
check, your turn
I said that they weren't top 10 before wars started to happen, which they both were and weren't. When Aeterna blooded them they weren't in top 10, also ascension was part of a pact, count those together and you will see their have quite a lot of strenght, more than some of the other top 10 fams.
* hits the watch
check, your turn
I am not anonymous but your points are rather weak.
Being member of Ferrante, Ferrante was never below 13 either in game or on ob news. In fact only time when Ferrante was below 11 was when Jannisary took them over for around day or two. Empire was also top 10 most of the time, same as Lusa (top 10 or around 10), so if you didn't blood top 10 fams you blooded top 15 fams for sure, cause not one of fams you blooded ever fell below number 15.
Also don't take this wrong, but with bloodings you guys did it is insulting to call others pact. Ascencion had 2 bloods when you killed em, and 2 sister fams of who neither one was in top 20 families, and their bloods had only 1 family in top 10 (Jannisary) if we count Ferrante as not top 10 which you do. Again I don't think Justice alliance is good for game, but calling them + Ascencion (+Marazzino?) pact after bloodings you guys did is laughable.
If you're so fast to throw word pact around, name one that was present in this version that you did not blood to? Gravano one - you pretty much destroyed it with blooding 2 old families of it. Turk pact - you blooded Marazzino from there. Only possible ''pact'' you weren't blooded to was Levi - Indelicato - Provenzano. Also any of these ''pacts'' had less bloods in top 15 (I wont say top 10 on purpose) than you. In fact there wasn't any other family besides Aeterna that had more families related to them in top 10 or top 15 from start of the version.
You won version fair and square, but way you did it is laughable to anyone who played this game long enough. Ask any top of family not blooded to you (actually I am sure some that are blooded to you think same just wont say it openly), what they think about your bloodings.
Oh, you're still going on about this? That's cute.
You don't have to agree you know, nobody is asking for your permission. We did what we did with reasons known to us. I see you are talking like you're fully aware of all connections/bloodings/deals going on, believe me, you're not.
'The way you did is laughable' 'Ask any any top of family not blooded to you'
And we should do that because? If there are families working with us not agreeing with what we do they have to do only 1 simple thing and that is /q AnyAeternaTop.
Don't get me wrong, you make a few valid points, but it's very easy to whine and complain about stuff when you aren't actually involved in matters. If it really bothers you so much, bring Vincitori back next version and we will see how you handle it, or are you going to claim now that the 3.3 version wasn't laughable either?
It beats writing endless essays from some kind of high horse when you have been gone for a long time, barely know what's going on, yet still feel righteous enough to QQ about 'the state of the game' just because you had a fam once upon a time.
lol saros...Aeterna is most shameless project iv ever seen in Omerta. When Conflict and Vinci blooded that was the equivalent to you and faffie being bloods this version. Aeterna then went about 10 steps past that mark having something like 8 of top 10 in your bloodlist (including yourself) including non shoot with Impact and Gravano. You can call me mad because we died if you want or so. The game is too small for such faggotry and I don't see what you are so proud of...Well done
Don't be sad that your little plan didn't work (ganging up entire omerta). I know it probably hurts, but it's all good my friend, time heals all wounds.
But when you do decide to mindlessly bash in public, atleast use some facts to back you up next time.
ganging up entire omerta? you and your gaypact+gayernonshoots = 65% of omerta.
ahahah just dont. little cute anon
Halford (22:58:18 - 18-12)
Anonymous at 22:56:57 on 18/12:
Christmas must come often for you. :')
Almost every single version.
Halford at 22:53:22 on 18/12:
OMG Finaly we see some dead Marazzino`s \o/
Christmaspresents arrived earlie this year :D
OMG Finaly we see some dead Marazzino`s \o/
Christmaspresents arrived earlie this year :D
Christmas must come often for you. :')
Almost every single version.
I love Christmaspresents :D
Anonymous (22:56:57 - 18-12)
Halford at 22:53:22 on 18/12:
OMG Finaly we see some dead Marazzino`s \o/
Christmaspresents arrived earlie this year :D
OMG Finaly we see some dead Marazzino`s \o/
Christmaspresents arrived earlie this year :D
Christmas must come often for you. :')
Almost every single version.
Halford (22:53:22 - 18-12)
OMG Finaly we see some dead Marazzino`s \o/
Christmaspresents arrived earlie this year :D
Christmaspresents arrived earlie this year :D
Anonymous (21:29:04 - 18-12)
I think its funny the people that have gangbang in pretty much every war now complain aeterna is too big. Looking at the stats the shooters were on a 1:1 ratio. It must feel a lot different when you're used to shoot in a 10:1 ratio doesn't it? To me this felt quite royal shooting since normally its me being on the receiving end of that 10:1 ratio wars. They are a lot easier to kill in a 1:1 ratio war. But hey that's why they probably need to shoot 10:1 right?
Dogukanforgotmypw (20:34:24 - 18-12)
Some of the losing side lost this war before the war ever started. When they made plan together with Aeterna against two significant powers who are not blooded or related with Aeterna and who are not big enough to be a threat to you. Without thinking what's going to happen in future while Aeterna stood there with all it's power. How shortsighted of you...
Now it seems you are outnumbered huh? Such a shame...
But at least some of you died/suicided with honor. Well good for you, perhaps you will be knighted and given titles from some Royalty because of your personality. But nothing in this game, because what this game needs is wit.
Now it seems you are outnumbered huh? Such a shame...
But at least some of you died/suicided with honor. Well good for you, perhaps you will be knighted and given titles from some Royalty because of your personality. But nothing in this game, because what this game needs is wit.
Anonymous (20:19:37 - 18-12)
Saros`away at 19:35:55 on 18/12:
Don't be sad that your little plan didn't work (ganging up entire omerta). I know it probably hurts, but it's all good my friend, time heals all wounds.
But when you do decide to mindlessly bash in public, atleast use some facts to back you up next time.
`Donalo`Sixx at 19:20:36 on 18/12:
lol saros...Aeterna is most shameless project iv ever seen in Omerta. When Conflict and Vinci blooded that was the equivalent to you and faffie being bloods this version. Aeterna then went about 10 steps past that mark having something like 8 of top 10 in your bloodlist (including yourself) including non shoot with Impact and Gravano. You can call me mad because we died if you want or so. The game is too small for such faggotry and I don't see what you are so proud of...Well done
Saros`away at 18:01:32 on 18/12:
Oh, you're still going on about this? That's cute.
You don't have to agree you know, nobody is asking for your permission. We did what we did with reasons known to us. I see you are talking like you're fully aware of all connections/bloodings/deals going on, believe me, you're not.
'The way you did is laughable' 'Ask any any top of family not blooded to you'
And we should do that because? If there are families working with us not agreeing with what we do they have to do only 1 simple thing and that is /q AnyAeternaTop.
Don't get me wrong, you make a few valid points, but it's very easy to whine and complain about stuff when you aren't actually involved in matters. If it really bothers you so much, bring Vincitori back next version and we will see how you handle it, or are you going to claim now that the 3.3 version wasn't laughable either?
It beats writing endless essays from some kind of high horse when you have been gone for a long time, barely know what's going on, yet still feel righteous enough to QQ about 'the state of the game' just because you had a fam once upon a time.
Johnny at 17:16:50 on 18/12:
I am not anonymous but your points are rather weak.
Being member of Ferrante, Ferrante was never below 13 either in game or on ob news. In fact only time when Ferrante was below 11 was when Jannisary took them over for around day or two. Empire was also top 10 most of the time, same as Lusa (top 10 or around 10), so if you didn't blood top 10 fams you blooded top 15 fams for sure, cause not one of fams you blooded ever fell below number 15.
Also don't take this wrong, but with bloodings you guys did it is insulting to call others pact. Ascencion had 2 bloods when you killed em, and 2 sister fams of who neither one was in top 20 families, and their bloods had only 1 family in top 10 (Jannisary) if we count Ferrante as not top 10 which you do. Again I don't think Justice alliance is good for game, but calling them + Ascencion (+Marazzino?) pact after bloodings you guys did is laughable.
If you're so fast to throw word pact around, name one that was present in this version that you did not blood to? Gravano one - you pretty much destroyed it with blooding 2 old families of it. Turk pact - you blooded Marazzino from there. Only possible ''pact'' you weren't blooded to was Levi - Indelicato - Provenzano. Also any of these ''pacts'' had less bloods in top 15 (I wont say top 10 on purpose) than you. In fact there wasn't any other family besides Aeterna that had more families related to them in top 10 or top 15 from start of the version.
You won version fair and square, but way you did it is laughable to anyone who played this game long enough. Ask any top of family not blooded to you (actually I am sure some that are blooded to you think same just wont say it openly), what they think about your bloodings.
Johnx at 16:58:19 on 18/12:
I said that they weren't top 10 before wars started to happen, which they both were and weren't. When Aeterna blooded them they weren't in top 10, also ascension was part of a pact, count those together and you will see their have quite a lot of strenght, more than some of the other top 10 fams.
* hits the watch
check, your turn
I said that they weren't top 10 before wars started to happen, which they both were and weren't. When Aeterna blooded them they weren't in top 10, also ascension was part of a pact, count those together and you will see their have quite a lot of strenght, more than some of the other top 10 fams.
* hits the watch
check, your turn
I am not anonymous but your points are rather weak.
Being member of Ferrante, Ferrante was never below 13 either in game or on ob news. In fact only time when Ferrante was below 11 was when Jannisary took them over for around day or two. Empire was also top 10 most of the time, same as Lusa (top 10 or around 10), so if you didn't blood top 10 fams you blooded top 15 fams for sure, cause not one of fams you blooded ever fell below number 15.
Also don't take this wrong, but with bloodings you guys did it is insulting to call others pact. Ascencion had 2 bloods when you killed em, and 2 sister fams of who neither one was in top 20 families, and their bloods had only 1 family in top 10 (Jannisary) if we count Ferrante as not top 10 which you do. Again I don't think Justice alliance is good for game, but calling them + Ascencion (+Marazzino?) pact after bloodings you guys did is laughable.
If you're so fast to throw word pact around, name one that was present in this version that you did not blood to? Gravano one - you pretty much destroyed it with blooding 2 old families of it. Turk pact - you blooded Marazzino from there. Only possible ''pact'' you weren't blooded to was Levi - Indelicato - Provenzano. Also any of these ''pacts'' had less bloods in top 15 (I wont say top 10 on purpose) than you. In fact there wasn't any other family besides Aeterna that had more families related to them in top 10 or top 15 from start of the version.
You won version fair and square, but way you did it is laughable to anyone who played this game long enough. Ask any top of family not blooded to you (actually I am sure some that are blooded to you think same just wont say it openly), what they think about your bloodings.
Oh, you're still going on about this? That's cute.
You don't have to agree you know, nobody is asking for your permission. We did what we did with reasons known to us. I see you are talking like you're fully aware of all connections/bloodings/deals going on, believe me, you're not.
'The way you did is laughable' 'Ask any any top of family not blooded to you'
And we should do that because? If there are families working with us not agreeing with what we do they have to do only 1 simple thing and that is /q AnyAeternaTop.
Don't get me wrong, you make a few valid points, but it's very easy to whine and complain about stuff when you aren't actually involved in matters. If it really bothers you so much, bring Vincitori back next version and we will see how you handle it, or are you going to claim now that the 3.3 version wasn't laughable either?
It beats writing endless essays from some kind of high horse when you have been gone for a long time, barely know what's going on, yet still feel righteous enough to QQ about 'the state of the game' just because you had a fam once upon a time.
lol saros...Aeterna is most shameless project iv ever seen in Omerta. When Conflict and Vinci blooded that was the equivalent to you and faffie being bloods this version. Aeterna then went about 10 steps past that mark having something like 8 of top 10 in your bloodlist (including yourself) including non shoot with Impact and Gravano. You can call me mad because we died if you want or so. The game is too small for such faggotry and I don't see what you are so proud of...Well done
Don't be sad that your little plan didn't work (ganging up entire omerta). I know it probably hurts, but it's all good my friend, time heals all wounds.
But when you do decide to mindlessly bash in public, atleast use some facts to back you up next time.
ganging up entire omerta? you and your gaypact+gayernonshoots = 65% of omerta.
Tbag (20:04:58 - 18-12)
`Donalo`Sixx at 19:57:17 on 18/12:
lol saros - I actually got nothing against you or your fam - I just like to laugh at those who are willing to do any cheese for a lil success- But w/e floats your boat my friend. After so long playing omerta i'm just playing for Proven, Dig (our loyal friends) and some long time friends in Levi. Also what I said is fact so you must be tripping or something xD or just dont know what the word "fact" means.
Anyway gl with rest of version and cya next \o
Saros`away at 19:35:55 on 18/12:
Don't be sad that your little plan didn't work (ganging up entire omerta). I know it probably hurts, but it's all good my friend, time heals all wounds.
But when you do decide to mindlessly bash in public, atleast use some facts to back you up next time.
`Donalo`Sixx at 19:20:36 on 18/12:
lol saros...Aeterna is most shameless project iv ever seen in Omerta. When Conflict and Vinci blooded that was the equivalent to you and faffie being bloods this version. Aeterna then went about 10 steps past that mark having something like 8 of top 10 in your bloodlist (including yourself) including non shoot with Impact and Gravano. You can call me mad because we died if you want or so. The game is too small for such faggotry and I don't see what you are so proud of...Well done
Saros`away at 18:01:32 on 18/12:
Oh, you're still going on about this? That's cute.
You don't have to agree you know, nobody is asking for your permission. We did what we did with reasons known to us. I see you are talking like you're fully aware of all connections/bloodings/deals going on, believe me, you're not.
'The way you did is laughable' 'Ask any any top of family not blooded to you'
And we should do that because? If there are families working with us not agreeing with what we do they have to do only 1 simple thing and that is /q AnyAeternaTop.
Don't get me wrong, you make a few valid points, but it's very easy to whine and complain about stuff when you aren't actually involved in matters. If it really bothers you so much, bring Vincitori back next version and we will see how you handle it, or are you going to claim now that the 3.3 version wasn't laughable either?
It beats writing endless essays from some kind of high horse when you have been gone for a long time, barely know what's going on, yet still feel righteous enough to QQ about 'the state of the game' just because you had a fam once upon a time.
Johnny at 17:16:50 on 18/12:
I am not anonymous but your points are rather weak.
Being member of Ferrante, Ferrante was never below 13 either in game or on ob news. In fact only time when Ferrante was below 11 was when Jannisary took them over for around day or two. Empire was also top 10 most of the time, same as Lusa (top 10 or around 10), so if you didn't blood top 10 fams you blooded top 15 fams for sure, cause not one of fams you blooded ever fell below number 15.
Also don't take this wrong, but with bloodings you guys did it is insulting to call others pact. Ascencion had 2 bloods when you killed em, and 2 sister fams of who neither one was in top 20 families, and their bloods had only 1 family in top 10 (Jannisary) if we count Ferrante as not top 10 which you do. Again I don't think Justice alliance is good for game, but calling them + Ascencion (+Marazzino?) pact after bloodings you guys did is laughable.
If you're so fast to throw word pact around, name one that was present in this version that you did not blood to? Gravano one - you pretty much destroyed it with blooding 2 old families of it. Turk pact - you blooded Marazzino from there. Only possible ''pact'' you weren't blooded to was Levi - Indelicato - Provenzano. Also any of these ''pacts'' had less bloods in top 15 (I wont say top 10 on purpose) than you. In fact there wasn't any other family besides Aeterna that had more families related to them in top 10 or top 15 from start of the version.
You won version fair and square, but way you did it is laughable to anyone who played this game long enough. Ask any top of family not blooded to you (actually I am sure some that are blooded to you think same just wont say it openly), what they think about your bloodings.
Johnx at 16:58:19 on 18/12:
I said that they weren't top 10 before wars started to happen, which they both were and weren't. When Aeterna blooded them they weren't in top 10, also ascension was part of a pact, count those together and you will see their have quite a lot of strenght, more than some of the other top 10 fams.
* hits the watch
check, your turn
I said that they weren't top 10 before wars started to happen, which they both were and weren't. When Aeterna blooded them they weren't in top 10, also ascension was part of a pact, count those together and you will see their have quite a lot of strenght, more than some of the other top 10 fams.
* hits the watch
check, your turn
I am not anonymous but your points are rather weak.
Being member of Ferrante, Ferrante was never below 13 either in game or on ob news. In fact only time when Ferrante was below 11 was when Jannisary took them over for around day or two. Empire was also top 10 most of the time, same as Lusa (top 10 or around 10), so if you didn't blood top 10 fams you blooded top 15 fams for sure, cause not one of fams you blooded ever fell below number 15.
Also don't take this wrong, but with bloodings you guys did it is insulting to call others pact. Ascencion had 2 bloods when you killed em, and 2 sister fams of who neither one was in top 20 families, and their bloods had only 1 family in top 10 (Jannisary) if we count Ferrante as not top 10 which you do. Again I don't think Justice alliance is good for game, but calling them + Ascencion (+Marazzino?) pact after bloodings you guys did is laughable.
If you're so fast to throw word pact around, name one that was present in this version that you did not blood to? Gravano one - you pretty much destroyed it with blooding 2 old families of it. Turk pact - you blooded Marazzino from there. Only possible ''pact'' you weren't blooded to was Levi - Indelicato - Provenzano. Also any of these ''pacts'' had less bloods in top 15 (I wont say top 10 on purpose) than you. In fact there wasn't any other family besides Aeterna that had more families related to them in top 10 or top 15 from start of the version.
You won version fair and square, but way you did it is laughable to anyone who played this game long enough. Ask any top of family not blooded to you (actually I am sure some that are blooded to you think same just wont say it openly), what they think about your bloodings.
Oh, you're still going on about this? That's cute.
You don't have to agree you know, nobody is asking for your permission. We did what we did with reasons known to us. I see you are talking like you're fully aware of all connections/bloodings/deals going on, believe me, you're not.
'The way you did is laughable' 'Ask any any top of family not blooded to you'
And we should do that because? If there are families working with us not agreeing with what we do they have to do only 1 simple thing and that is /q AnyAeternaTop.
Don't get me wrong, you make a few valid points, but it's very easy to whine and complain about stuff when you aren't actually involved in matters. If it really bothers you so much, bring Vincitori back next version and we will see how you handle it, or are you going to claim now that the 3.3 version wasn't laughable either?
It beats writing endless essays from some kind of high horse when you have been gone for a long time, barely know what's going on, yet still feel righteous enough to QQ about 'the state of the game' just because you had a fam once upon a time.
lol saros...Aeterna is most shameless project iv ever seen in Omerta. When Conflict and Vinci blooded that was the equivalent to you and faffie being bloods this version. Aeterna then went about 10 steps past that mark having something like 8 of top 10 in your bloodlist (including yourself) including non shoot with Impact and Gravano. You can call me mad because we died if you want or so. The game is too small for such faggotry and I don't see what you are so proud of...Well done
Don't be sad that your little plan didn't work (ganging up entire omerta). I know it probably hurts, but it's all good my friend, time heals all wounds.
But when you do decide to mindlessly bash in public, atleast use some facts to back you up next time.
lol saros - I actually got nothing against you or your fam - I just like to laugh at those who are willing to do any cheese for a lil success- But w/e floats your boat my friend. After so long playing omerta i'm just playing for Proven, Dig (our loyal friends) and some long time friends in Levi. Also what I said is fact so you must be tripping or something xD or just dont know what the word "fact" means.
Anyway gl with rest of version and cya next \o
nah no need to luck bro, he just needs shoot his own bloods and win this one 2 :')
Anonymous (19:58:47 - 18-12)
Johnny at 19:41:54 on 18/12:
I mean I don't expect much from anonymous posters, but reading and understanding of what is written is very basic thing.
If you read beginning of Xerano's post that I quoted you will find your answer.
Anyway I'm over and out of this. I just shared my opinion had no intention to insult or provoke anyone, so good game to all of those who still play.
Anonymous at 19:32:09 on 18/12:
Still waiting for you Johnny.
Come on name them, or did you just make them up to give your argument more substance?
Anonymous at 16:14:06 on 18/12:
Could you name those tops?
So we can actually judge them later by their actual blooding behaviour and not what they want to do? Talk is cheap afterall.
Johnny at 16:01:42 on 18/12:
I completely agree with your 1st point. People here take everything too personal (hell I was same when I played), but yes that is biggest problem. People need to be able to kill and die without taking it personal, people need to understand that just cause someone shot with you in last 2 wars doesn't have to be your bff for the rest of the game. However I agree this is wishful thinking and that these things are very unlikely to change.
I was on both sides in these situations, part of huge groups and target of large groups, and I completely agree that all families need to be on the same page with this, cause it takes only 1 group and 1 bigger fam to stop this from happening. Families need to be run with desire to enjoy game and have fun playing, instead of run by fear and desire to ''pwn'' everyone else by any cost.
I actually think if families (and I mean all of em) would try this, ''new'' way of playing instead of standard lets blood till we drop, they would have more fun shooting in much more open wars. Dying and reranking would be very viable option, and it could keep game flow going on for much longer than month or two. Of course all this would ask for admin help in all of this, providing good KA and healthy game environment.
Actually I'm really happy that tops from leading fams see this as more interesting way to play game.
Xerano at 15:48:51 on 18/12:
Eventhough I agree that it sounds like something that could be more interesting it's just wishful thinking. The problem lies in people clinging onto the connections they've made over the years, even when they dont blood a fam they refuse to shoot them because they're old friends. In the meantime they're also creating new connections. The other thing that never changes aswell is the 'hate' for certain families. If you have shot someone in 2.X they still use that as a reason to shoot you.
Families have tried to drop the amount of bloods to 3-4 but on the other hand others increase it to 8-9 (Or just add an alliance to their bloodlist while being an alliance themselves like Justice/ASA). This only results in the fam with the least amount of bloods to get gangbanged on in the first war. Being on the receiving end for versions in a row is quite frustrating so obviously you'll explore other ways. People can complain all you want about Aeterna blooding top10 fams only or whatever, but don't forget those fams became top10 fams after Jannisary/Ascenion/Anarchy were killed. .
Eventhough I agree that it sounds like something that could be more interesting it's just wishful thinking. The problem lies in people clinging onto the connections they've made over the years, even when they dont blood a fam they refuse to shoot them because they're old friends. In the meantime they're also creating new connections. The other thing that never changes aswell is the 'hate' for certain families. If you have shot someone in 2.X they still use that as a reason to shoot you.
Families have tried to drop the amount of bloods to 3-4 but on the other hand others increase it to 8-9 (Or just add an alliance to their bloodlist while being an alliance themselves like Justice/ASA). This only results in the fam with the least amount of bloods to get gangbanged on in the first war. Being on the receiving end for versions in a row is quite frustrating so obviously you'll explore other ways. People can complain all you want about Aeterna blooding top10 fams only or whatever, but don't forget those fams became top10 fams after Jannisary/Ascenion/Anarchy were killed. .
I completely agree with your 1st point. People here take everything too personal (hell I was same when I played), but yes that is biggest problem. People need to be able to kill and die without taking it personal, people need to understand that just cause someone shot with you in last 2 wars doesn't have to be your bff for the rest of the game. However I agree this is wishful thinking and that these things are very unlikely to change.
I was on both sides in these situations, part of huge groups and target of large groups, and I completely agree that all families need to be on the same page with this, cause it takes only 1 group and 1 bigger fam to stop this from happening. Families need to be run with desire to enjoy game and have fun playing, instead of run by fear and desire to ''pwn'' everyone else by any cost.
I actually think if families (and I mean all of em) would try this, ''new'' way of playing instead of standard lets blood till we drop, they would have more fun shooting in much more open wars. Dying and reranking would be very viable option, and it could keep game flow going on for much longer than month or two. Of course all this would ask for admin help in all of this, providing good KA and healthy game environment.
Actually I'm really happy that tops from leading fams see this as more interesting way to play game.
Could you name those tops?
So we can actually judge them later by their actual blooding behaviour and not what they want to do? Talk is cheap afterall.
Still waiting for you Johnny.
Come on name them, or did you just make them up to give your argument more substance?
I mean I don't expect much from anonymous posters, but reading and understanding of what is written is very basic thing.
If you read beginning of Xerano's post that I quoted you will find your answer.
Anyway I'm over and out of this. I just shared my opinion had no intention to insult or provoke anyone, so good game to all of those who still play.
Correct use of singular and plural are as basic.
You spoke of tops from leading fams, and not just one person who has still gathered an oversized bloodweb (you spoke of 3 bloods with a remaining player base that little?).
But nevermind.
Saros`away at 19:35:55 on 18/12:
Don't be sad that your little plan didn't work (ganging up entire omerta). I know it probably hurts, but it's all good my friend, time heals all wounds.
But when you do decide to mindlessly bash in public, atleast use some facts to back you up next time.
`Donalo`Sixx at 19:20:36 on 18/12:
lol saros...Aeterna is most shameless project iv ever seen in Omerta. When Conflict and Vinci blooded that was the equivalent to you and faffie being bloods this version. Aeterna then went about 10 steps past that mark having something like 8 of top 10 in your bloodlist (including yourself) including non shoot with Impact and Gravano. You can call me mad because we died if you want or so. The game is too small for such faggotry and I don't see what you are so proud of...Well done
Saros`away at 18:01:32 on 18/12:
Oh, you're still going on about this? That's cute.
You don't have to agree you know, nobody is asking for your permission. We did what we did with reasons known to us. I see you are talking like you're fully aware of all connections/bloodings/deals going on, believe me, you're not.
'The way you did is laughable' 'Ask any any top of family not blooded to you'
And we should do that because? If there are families working with us not agreeing with what we do they have to do only 1 simple thing and that is /q AnyAeternaTop.
Don't get me wrong, you make a few valid points, but it's very easy to whine and complain about stuff when you aren't actually involved in matters. If it really bothers you so much, bring Vincitori back next version and we will see how you handle it, or are you going to claim now that the 3.3 version wasn't laughable either?
It beats writing endless essays from some kind of high horse when you have been gone for a long time, barely know what's going on, yet still feel righteous enough to QQ about 'the state of the game' just because you had a fam once upon a time.
Johnny at 17:16:50 on 18/12:
I am not anonymous but your points are rather weak.
Being member of Ferrante, Ferrante was never below 13 either in game or on ob news. In fact only time when Ferrante was below 11 was when Jannisary took them over for around day or two. Empire was also top 10 most of the time, same as Lusa (top 10 or around 10), so if you didn't blood top 10 fams you blooded top 15 fams for sure, cause not one of fams you blooded ever fell below number 15.
Also don't take this wrong, but with bloodings you guys did it is insulting to call others pact. Ascencion had 2 bloods when you killed em, and 2 sister fams of who neither one was in top 20 families, and their bloods had only 1 family in top 10 (Jannisary) if we count Ferrante as not top 10 which you do. Again I don't think Justice alliance is good for game, but calling them + Ascencion (+Marazzino?) pact after bloodings you guys did is laughable.
If you're so fast to throw word pact around, name one that was present in this version that you did not blood to? Gravano one - you pretty much destroyed it with blooding 2 old families of it. Turk pact - you blooded Marazzino from there. Only possible ''pact'' you weren't blooded to was Levi - Indelicato - Provenzano. Also any of these ''pacts'' had less bloods in top 15 (I wont say top 10 on purpose) than you. In fact there wasn't any other family besides Aeterna that had more families related to them in top 10 or top 15 from start of the version.
You won version fair and square, but way you did it is laughable to anyone who played this game long enough. Ask any top of family not blooded to you (actually I am sure some that are blooded to you think same just wont say it openly), what they think about your bloodings.
Johnx at 16:58:19 on 18/12:
I said that they weren't top 10 before wars started to happen, which they both were and weren't. When Aeterna blooded them they weren't in top 10, also ascension was part of a pact, count those together and you will see their have quite a lot of strenght, more than some of the other top 10 fams.
* hits the watch
check, your turn
I said that they weren't top 10 before wars started to happen, which they both were and weren't. When Aeterna blooded them they weren't in top 10, also ascension was part of a pact, count those together and you will see their have quite a lot of strenght, more than some of the other top 10 fams.
* hits the watch
check, your turn
I am not anonymous but your points are rather weak.
Being member of Ferrante, Ferrante was never below 13 either in game or on ob news. In fact only time when Ferrante was below 11 was when Jannisary took them over for around day or two. Empire was also top 10 most of the time, same as Lusa (top 10 or around 10), so if you didn't blood top 10 fams you blooded top 15 fams for sure, cause not one of fams you blooded ever fell below number 15.
Also don't take this wrong, but with bloodings you guys did it is insulting to call others pact. Ascencion had 2 bloods when you killed em, and 2 sister fams of who neither one was in top 20 families, and their bloods had only 1 family in top 10 (Jannisary) if we count Ferrante as not top 10 which you do. Again I don't think Justice alliance is good for game, but calling them + Ascencion (+Marazzino?) pact after bloodings you guys did is laughable.
If you're so fast to throw word pact around, name one that was present in this version that you did not blood to? Gravano one - you pretty much destroyed it with blooding 2 old families of it. Turk pact - you blooded Marazzino from there. Only possible ''pact'' you weren't blooded to was Levi - Indelicato - Provenzano. Also any of these ''pacts'' had less bloods in top 15 (I wont say top 10 on purpose) than you. In fact there wasn't any other family besides Aeterna that had more families related to them in top 10 or top 15 from start of the version.
You won version fair and square, but way you did it is laughable to anyone who played this game long enough. Ask any top of family not blooded to you (actually I am sure some that are blooded to you think same just wont say it openly), what they think about your bloodings.
Oh, you're still going on about this? That's cute.
You don't have to agree you know, nobody is asking for your permission. We did what we did with reasons known to us. I see you are talking like you're fully aware of all connections/bloodings/deals going on, believe me, you're not.
'The way you did is laughable' 'Ask any any top of family not blooded to you'
And we should do that because? If there are families working with us not agreeing with what we do they have to do only 1 simple thing and that is /q AnyAeternaTop.
Don't get me wrong, you make a few valid points, but it's very easy to whine and complain about stuff when you aren't actually involved in matters. If it really bothers you so much, bring Vincitori back next version and we will see how you handle it, or are you going to claim now that the 3.3 version wasn't laughable either?
It beats writing endless essays from some kind of high horse when you have been gone for a long time, barely know what's going on, yet still feel righteous enough to QQ about 'the state of the game' just because you had a fam once upon a time.
lol saros...Aeterna is most shameless project iv ever seen in Omerta. When Conflict and Vinci blooded that was the equivalent to you and faffie being bloods this version. Aeterna then went about 10 steps past that mark having something like 8 of top 10 in your bloodlist (including yourself) including non shoot with Impact and Gravano. You can call me mad because we died if you want or so. The game is too small for such faggotry and I don't see what you are so proud of...Well done
Don't be sad that your little plan didn't work (ganging up entire omerta). I know it probably hurts, but it's all good my friend, time heals all wounds.
But when you do decide to mindlessly bash in public, atleast use some facts to back you up next time.
lol saros - I actually got nothing against you or your fam - I just like to laugh at those who are willing to do any cheese for a lil success- But w/e floats your boat my friend. After so long playing omerta i'm just playing for Proven, Dig (our loyal friends) and some long time friends in Levi. Also what I said is fact so you must be tripping or something xD or just dont know what the word "fact" means.
Anyway gl with rest of version and cya next \o
`Donalo`Sixx at 19:41:56 on 18/12:
Don't worry Johnx I think you still got that title by a long way.
Johnx at 19:24:09 on 18/12:
And I actually thought i would be the one to talk most bullshit on beyond today. I guess i was wrong :|
`Donalo`Sixx at 19:20:36 on 18/12:
lol saros...Aeterna is most shameless project iv ever seen in Omerta. When Conflict and Vinci blooded that was the equivalent to you and faffie being bloods this version. Aeterna then went about 10 steps past that mark having something like 8 of top 10 in your bloodlist (including yourself) including non shoot with Impact and Gravano. You can call me mad because we died if you want or so. The game is too small for such faggotry and I don't see what you are so proud of...Well done
Saros`away at 18:01:32 on 18/12:
Oh, you're still going on about this? That's cute.
You don't have to agree you know, nobody is asking for your permission. We did what we did with reasons known to us. I see you are talking like you're fully aware of all connections/bloodings/deals going on, believe me, you're not.
'The way you did is laughable' 'Ask any any top of family not blooded to you'
And we should do that because? If there are families working with us not agreeing with what we do they have to do only 1 simple thing and that is /q AnyAeternaTop.
Don't get me wrong, you make a few valid points, but it's very easy to whine and complain about stuff when you aren't actually involved in matters. If it really bothers you so much, bring Vincitori back next version and we will see how you handle it, or are you going to claim now that the 3.3 version wasn't laughable either?
It beats writing endless essays from some kind of high horse when you have been gone for a long time, barely know what's going on, yet still feel righteous enough to QQ about 'the state of the game' just because you had a fam once upon a time.
Johnny at 17:16:50 on 18/12:
I am not anonymous but your points are rather weak.
Being member of Ferrante, Ferrante was never below 13 either in game or on ob news. In fact only time when Ferrante was below 11 was when Jannisary took them over for around day or two. Empire was also top 10 most of the time, same as Lusa (top 10 or around 10), so if you didn't blood top 10 fams you blooded top 15 fams for sure, cause not one of fams you blooded ever fell below number 15.
Also don't take this wrong, but with bloodings you guys did it is insulting to call others pact. Ascencion had 2 bloods when you killed em, and 2 sister fams of who neither one was in top 20 families, and their bloods had only 1 family in top 10 (Jannisary) if we count Ferrante as not top 10 which you do. Again I don't think Justice alliance is good for game, but calling them + Ascencion (+Marazzino?) pact after bloodings you guys did is laughable.
If you're so fast to throw word pact around, name one that was present in this version that you did not blood to? Gravano one - you pretty much destroyed it with blooding 2 old families of it. Turk pact - you blooded Marazzino from there. Only possible ''pact'' you weren't blooded to was Levi - Indelicato - Provenzano. Also any of these ''pacts'' had less bloods in top 15 (I wont say top 10 on purpose) than you. In fact there wasn't any other family besides Aeterna that had more families related to them in top 10 or top 15 from start of the version.
You won version fair and square, but way you did it is laughable to anyone who played this game long enough. Ask any top of family not blooded to you (actually I am sure some that are blooded to you think same just wont say it openly), what they think about your bloodings.
Johnx at 16:58:19 on 18/12:
I said that they weren't top 10 before wars started to happen, which they both were and weren't. When Aeterna blooded them they weren't in top 10, also ascension was part of a pact, count those together and you will see their have quite a lot of strenght, more than some of the other top 10 fams.
* hits the watch
check, your turn
I said that they weren't top 10 before wars started to happen, which they both were and weren't. When Aeterna blooded them they weren't in top 10, also ascension was part of a pact, count those together and you will see their have quite a lot of strenght, more than some of the other top 10 fams.
* hits the watch
check, your turn
I am not anonymous but your points are rather weak.
Being member of Ferrante, Ferrante was never below 13 either in game or on ob news. In fact only time when Ferrante was below 11 was when Jannisary took them over for around day or two. Empire was also top 10 most of the time, same as Lusa (top 10 or around 10), so if you didn't blood top 10 fams you blooded top 15 fams for sure, cause not one of fams you blooded ever fell below number 15.
Also don't take this wrong, but with bloodings you guys did it is insulting to call others pact. Ascencion had 2 bloods when you killed em, and 2 sister fams of who neither one was in top 20 families, and their bloods had only 1 family in top 10 (Jannisary) if we count Ferrante as not top 10 which you do. Again I don't think Justice alliance is good for game, but calling them + Ascencion (+Marazzino?) pact after bloodings you guys did is laughable.
If you're so fast to throw word pact around, name one that was present in this version that you did not blood to? Gravano one - you pretty much destroyed it with blooding 2 old families of it. Turk pact - you blooded Marazzino from there. Only possible ''pact'' you weren't blooded to was Levi - Indelicato - Provenzano. Also any of these ''pacts'' had less bloods in top 15 (I wont say top 10 on purpose) than you. In fact there wasn't any other family besides Aeterna that had more families related to them in top 10 or top 15 from start of the version.
You won version fair and square, but way you did it is laughable to anyone who played this game long enough. Ask any top of family not blooded to you (actually I am sure some that are blooded to you think same just wont say it openly), what they think about your bloodings.
Oh, you're still going on about this? That's cute.
You don't have to agree you know, nobody is asking for your permission. We did what we did with reasons known to us. I see you are talking like you're fully aware of all connections/bloodings/deals going on, believe me, you're not.
'The way you did is laughable' 'Ask any any top of family not blooded to you'
And we should do that because? If there are families working with us not agreeing with what we do they have to do only 1 simple thing and that is /q AnyAeternaTop.
Don't get me wrong, you make a few valid points, but it's very easy to whine and complain about stuff when you aren't actually involved in matters. If it really bothers you so much, bring Vincitori back next version and we will see how you handle it, or are you going to claim now that the 3.3 version wasn't laughable either?
It beats writing endless essays from some kind of high horse when you have been gone for a long time, barely know what's going on, yet still feel righteous enough to QQ about 'the state of the game' just because you had a fam once upon a time.
lol saros...Aeterna is most shameless project iv ever seen in Omerta. When Conflict and Vinci blooded that was the equivalent to you and faffie being bloods this version. Aeterna then went about 10 steps past that mark having something like 8 of top 10 in your bloodlist (including yourself) including non shoot with Impact and Gravano. You can call me mad because we died if you want or so. The game is too small for such faggotry and I don't see what you are so proud of...Well done
Don't worry Johnx I think you still got that title by a long way.
Johnx at 19:24:09 on 18/12:
And I actually thought i would be the one to talk most bullshit on beyond today. I guess i was wrong :|
`Donalo`Sixx at 19:20:36 on 18/12:
lol saros...Aeterna is most shameless project iv ever seen in Omerta. When Conflict and Vinci blooded that was the equivalent to you and faffie being bloods this version. Aeterna then went about 10 steps past that mark having something like 8 of top 10 in your bloodlist (including yourself) including non shoot with Impact and Gravano. You can call me mad because we died if you want or so. The game is too small for such faggotry and I don't see what you are so proud of...Well done
Saros`away at 18:01:32 on 18/12:
Oh, you're still going on about this? That's cute.
You don't have to agree you know, nobody is asking for your permission. We did what we did with reasons known to us. I see you are talking like you're fully aware of all connections/bloodings/deals going on, believe me, you're not.
'The way you did is laughable' 'Ask any any top of family not blooded to you'
And we should do that because? If there are families working with us not agreeing with what we do they have to do only 1 simple thing and that is /q AnyAeternaTop.
Don't get me wrong, you make a few valid points, but it's very easy to whine and complain about stuff when you aren't actually involved in matters. If it really bothers you so much, bring Vincitori back next version and we will see how you handle it, or are you going to claim now that the 3.3 version wasn't laughable either?
It beats writing endless essays from some kind of high horse when you have been gone for a long time, barely know what's going on, yet still feel righteous enough to QQ about 'the state of the game' just because you had a fam once upon a time.
Johnny at 17:16:50 on 18/12:
I am not anonymous but your points are rather weak.
Being member of Ferrante, Ferrante was never below 13 either in game or on ob news. In fact only time when Ferrante was below 11 was when Jannisary took them over for around day or two. Empire was also top 10 most of the time, same as Lusa (top 10 or around 10), so if you didn't blood top 10 fams you blooded top 15 fams for sure, cause not one of fams you blooded ever fell below number 15.
Also don't take this wrong, but with bloodings you guys did it is insulting to call others pact. Ascencion had 2 bloods when you killed em, and 2 sister fams of who neither one was in top 20 families, and their bloods had only 1 family in top 10 (Jannisary) if we count Ferrante as not top 10 which you do. Again I don't think Justice alliance is good for game, but calling them + Ascencion (+Marazzino?) pact after bloodings you guys did is laughable.
If you're so fast to throw word pact around, name one that was present in this version that you did not blood to? Gravano one - you pretty much destroyed it with blooding 2 old families of it. Turk pact - you blooded Marazzino from there. Only possible ''pact'' you weren't blooded to was Levi - Indelicato - Provenzano. Also any of these ''pacts'' had less bloods in top 15 (I wont say top 10 on purpose) than you. In fact there wasn't any other family besides Aeterna that had more families related to them in top 10 or top 15 from start of the version.
You won version fair and square, but way you did it is laughable to anyone who played this game long enough. Ask any top of family not blooded to you (actually I am sure some that are blooded to you think same just wont say it openly), what they think about your bloodings.
Johnx at 16:58:19 on 18/12:
I said that they weren't top 10 before wars started to happen, which they both were and weren't. When Aeterna blooded them they weren't in top 10, also ascension was part of a pact, count those together and you will see their have quite a lot of strenght, more than some of the other top 10 fams.
* hits the watch
check, your turn
I said that they weren't top 10 before wars started to happen, which they both were and weren't. When Aeterna blooded them they weren't in top 10, also ascension was part of a pact, count those together and you will see their have quite a lot of strenght, more than some of the other top 10 fams.
* hits the watch
check, your turn
I am not anonymous but your points are rather weak.
Being member of Ferrante, Ferrante was never below 13 either in game or on ob news. In fact only time when Ferrante was below 11 was when Jannisary took them over for around day or two. Empire was also top 10 most of the time, same as Lusa (top 10 or around 10), so if you didn't blood top 10 fams you blooded top 15 fams for sure, cause not one of fams you blooded ever fell below number 15.
Also don't take this wrong, but with bloodings you guys did it is insulting to call others pact. Ascencion had 2 bloods when you killed em, and 2 sister fams of who neither one was in top 20 families, and their bloods had only 1 family in top 10 (Jannisary) if we count Ferrante as not top 10 which you do. Again I don't think Justice alliance is good for game, but calling them + Ascencion (+Marazzino?) pact after bloodings you guys did is laughable.
If you're so fast to throw word pact around, name one that was present in this version that you did not blood to? Gravano one - you pretty much destroyed it with blooding 2 old families of it. Turk pact - you blooded Marazzino from there. Only possible ''pact'' you weren't blooded to was Levi - Indelicato - Provenzano. Also any of these ''pacts'' had less bloods in top 15 (I wont say top 10 on purpose) than you. In fact there wasn't any other family besides Aeterna that had more families related to them in top 10 or top 15 from start of the version.
You won version fair and square, but way you did it is laughable to anyone who played this game long enough. Ask any top of family not blooded to you (actually I am sure some that are blooded to you think same just wont say it openly), what they think about your bloodings.
Oh, you're still going on about this? That's cute.
You don't have to agree you know, nobody is asking for your permission. We did what we did with reasons known to us. I see you are talking like you're fully aware of all connections/bloodings/deals going on, believe me, you're not.
'The way you did is laughable' 'Ask any any top of family not blooded to you'
And we should do that because? If there are families working with us not agreeing with what we do they have to do only 1 simple thing and that is /q AnyAeternaTop.
Don't get me wrong, you make a few valid points, but it's very easy to whine and complain about stuff when you aren't actually involved in matters. If it really bothers you so much, bring Vincitori back next version and we will see how you handle it, or are you going to claim now that the 3.3 version wasn't laughable either?
It beats writing endless essays from some kind of high horse when you have been gone for a long time, barely know what's going on, yet still feel righteous enough to QQ about 'the state of the game' just because you had a fam once upon a time.
lol saros...Aeterna is most shameless project iv ever seen in Omerta. When Conflict and Vinci blooded that was the equivalent to you and faffie being bloods this version. Aeterna then went about 10 steps past that mark having something like 8 of top 10 in your bloodlist (including yourself) including non shoot with Impact and Gravano. You can call me mad because we died if you want or so. The game is too small for such faggotry and I don't see what you are so proud of...Well done
Don't worry Johnx I think you still got that title by a long way.
Anonymous at 19:32:09 on 18/12:
Still waiting for you Johnny.
Come on name them, or did you just make them up to give your argument more substance?
Anonymous at 16:14:06 on 18/12:
Could you name those tops?
So we can actually judge them later by their actual blooding behaviour and not what they want to do? Talk is cheap afterall.
Johnny at 16:01:42 on 18/12:
I completely agree with your 1st point. People here take everything too personal (hell I was same when I played), but yes that is biggest problem. People need to be able to kill and die without taking it personal, people need to understand that just cause someone shot with you in last 2 wars doesn't have to be your bff for the rest of the game. However I agree this is wishful thinking and that these things are very unlikely to change.
I was on both sides in these situations, part of huge groups and target of large groups, and I completely agree that all families need to be on the same page with this, cause it takes only 1 group and 1 bigger fam to stop this from happening. Families need to be run with desire to enjoy game and have fun playing, instead of run by fear and desire to ''pwn'' everyone else by any cost.
I actually think if families (and I mean all of em) would try this, ''new'' way of playing instead of standard lets blood till we drop, they would have more fun shooting in much more open wars. Dying and reranking would be very viable option, and it could keep game flow going on for much longer than month or two. Of course all this would ask for admin help in all of this, providing good KA and healthy game environment.
Actually I'm really happy that tops from leading fams see this as more interesting way to play game.
Xerano at 15:48:51 on 18/12:
Eventhough I agree that it sounds like something that could be more interesting it's just wishful thinking. The problem lies in people clinging onto the connections they've made over the years, even when they dont blood a fam they refuse to shoot them because they're old friends. In the meantime they're also creating new connections. The other thing that never changes aswell is the 'hate' for certain families. If you have shot someone in 2.X they still use that as a reason to shoot you.
Families have tried to drop the amount of bloods to 3-4 but on the other hand others increase it to 8-9 (Or just add an alliance to their bloodlist while being an alliance themselves like Justice/ASA). This only results in the fam with the least amount of bloods to get gangbanged on in the first war. Being on the receiving end for versions in a row is quite frustrating so obviously you'll explore other ways. People can complain all you want about Aeterna blooding top10 fams only or whatever, but don't forget those fams became top10 fams after Jannisary/Ascenion/Anarchy were killed. .
Eventhough I agree that it sounds like something that could be more interesting it's just wishful thinking. The problem lies in people clinging onto the connections they've made over the years, even when they dont blood a fam they refuse to shoot them because they're old friends. In the meantime they're also creating new connections. The other thing that never changes aswell is the 'hate' for certain families. If you have shot someone in 2.X they still use that as a reason to shoot you.
Families have tried to drop the amount of bloods to 3-4 but on the other hand others increase it to 8-9 (Or just add an alliance to their bloodlist while being an alliance themselves like Justice/ASA). This only results in the fam with the least amount of bloods to get gangbanged on in the first war. Being on the receiving end for versions in a row is quite frustrating so obviously you'll explore other ways. People can complain all you want about Aeterna blooding top10 fams only or whatever, but don't forget those fams became top10 fams after Jannisary/Ascenion/Anarchy were killed. .
I completely agree with your 1st point. People here take everything too personal (hell I was same when I played), but yes that is biggest problem. People need to be able to kill and die without taking it personal, people need to understand that just cause someone shot with you in last 2 wars doesn't have to be your bff for the rest of the game. However I agree this is wishful thinking and that these things are very unlikely to change.
I was on both sides in these situations, part of huge groups and target of large groups, and I completely agree that all families need to be on the same page with this, cause it takes only 1 group and 1 bigger fam to stop this from happening. Families need to be run with desire to enjoy game and have fun playing, instead of run by fear and desire to ''pwn'' everyone else by any cost.
I actually think if families (and I mean all of em) would try this, ''new'' way of playing instead of standard lets blood till we drop, they would have more fun shooting in much more open wars. Dying and reranking would be very viable option, and it could keep game flow going on for much longer than month or two. Of course all this would ask for admin help in all of this, providing good KA and healthy game environment.
Actually I'm really happy that tops from leading fams see this as more interesting way to play game.
Could you name those tops?
So we can actually judge them later by their actual blooding behaviour and not what they want to do? Talk is cheap afterall.
Still waiting for you Johnny.
Come on name them, or did you just make them up to give your argument more substance?
I mean I don't expect much from anonymous posters, but reading and understanding of what is written is very basic thing.
If you read beginning of Xerano's post that I quoted you will find your answer.
Anyway I'm over and out of this. I just shared my opinion had no intention to insult or provoke anyone, so good game to all of those who still play.