» Menu
» OB/Site News
» Articles
» Barafranca News
 |
|
article
After a day full of rumours the streets of Omerta are filling up with gangsters from a large variety of families...
Word on the street was that Provenzano+ and their bloods Leviticus & Indelicato had hired detectives on Aeterna+ and vice versa.
Faffie, Gambino & Alcatraz are the first ones to pull their triggers and are targeting Indelicato.
Only moments later, Provenzano+ Krays and Legends open fire on Aeterna+. Five minutes later Aeterna's respone is visible on the statistics page.
Half an hour later we see a new wave of gangsters catching bullets.
More gangsters from Aeterna and Lusa, this time aided by Ferrante, are shooting at Provenzano & Hattrickelli.
Simultaneously Empire & Marazzino open fire on Ataraxia.
All this shooting has proven insufficient to make a serious dent in Aeterna+…. therefore Impact, Kurosawa & Gravano are pointing their tommies towards Aeterna as well.
To save their blood from being shot down, Lusa Empire and Ferrante again pick up their tommy guns, this time aiming towards Impact.
Kurosawa and Gravano continue to battle Aeterna+ to the break of dawn.
Word on the street was that Provenzano+ and their bloods Leviticus & Indelicato had hired detectives on Aeterna+ and vice versa.
Faffie, Gambino & Alcatraz are the first ones to pull their triggers and are targeting Indelicato.
Only moments later, Provenzano+ Krays and Legends open fire on Aeterna+. Five minutes later Aeterna's respone is visible on the statistics page.
Half an hour later we see a new wave of gangsters catching bullets.
More gangsters from Aeterna and Lusa, this time aided by Ferrante, are shooting at Provenzano & Hattrickelli.
Simultaneously Empire & Marazzino open fire on Ataraxia.
All this shooting has proven insufficient to make a serious dent in Aeterna+…. therefore Impact, Kurosawa & Gravano are pointing their tommies towards Aeterna as well.
To save their blood from being shot down, Lusa Empire and Ferrante again pick up their tommy guns, this time aiming towards Impact.
Kurosawa and Gravano continue to battle Aeterna+ to the break of dawn.
statements
Saros`away (Aeterna top): "Well that was amusing"
statistics
| War started on: 19:54:03 17-12-2013 | War ended on: 03:17:02 19-12-2013 |
| Bullet difference: -88,582,225 | War duration: 1d 7h 22m |
| Money difference: -$5,023,653,676 | Players died: 850 |
deaths
Dead Families:
Deaths per family:
|
|
0
Anonymous (19:41:22 - 18-12)
`Donalo`Sixx at 19:20:36 on 18/12:
lol saros...Aeterna is most shameless project iv ever seen in Omerta. When Conflict and Vinci blooded that was the equivalent to you and faffie being bloods this version. Aeterna then went about 10 steps past that mark having something like 8 of top 10 in your bloodlist (including yourself) including non shoot with Impact and Gravano. You can call me mad because we died if you want or so. The game is too small for such faggotry and I don't see what you are so proud of...Well done
Saros`away at 18:01:32 on 18/12:
Oh, you're still going on about this? That's cute.
You don't have to agree you know, nobody is asking for your permission. We did what we did with reasons known to us. I see you are talking like you're fully aware of all connections/bloodings/deals going on, believe me, you're not.
'The way you did is laughable' 'Ask any any top of family not blooded to you'
And we should do that because? If there are families working with us not agreeing with what we do they have to do only 1 simple thing and that is /q AnyAeternaTop.
Don't get me wrong, you make a few valid points, but it's very easy to whine and complain about stuff when you aren't actually involved in matters. If it really bothers you so much, bring Vincitori back next version and we will see how you handle it, or are you going to claim now that the 3.3 version wasn't laughable either?
It beats writing endless essays from some kind of high horse when you have been gone for a long time, barely know what's going on, yet still feel righteous enough to QQ about 'the state of the game' just because you had a fam once upon a time.
Johnny at 17:16:50 on 18/12:
I am not anonymous but your points are rather weak.
Being member of Ferrante, Ferrante was never below 13 either in game or on ob news. In fact only time when Ferrante was below 11 was when Jannisary took them over for around day or two. Empire was also top 10 most of the time, same as Lusa (top 10 or around 10), so if you didn't blood top 10 fams you blooded top 15 fams for sure, cause not one of fams you blooded ever fell below number 15.
Also don't take this wrong, but with bloodings you guys did it is insulting to call others pact. Ascencion had 2 bloods when you killed em, and 2 sister fams of who neither one was in top 20 families, and their bloods had only 1 family in top 10 (Jannisary) if we count Ferrante as not top 10 which you do. Again I don't think Justice alliance is good for game, but calling them + Ascencion (+Marazzino?) pact after bloodings you guys did is laughable.
If you're so fast to throw word pact around, name one that was present in this version that you did not blood to? Gravano one - you pretty much destroyed it with blooding 2 old families of it. Turk pact - you blooded Marazzino from there. Only possible ''pact'' you weren't blooded to was Levi - Indelicato - Provenzano. Also any of these ''pacts'' had less bloods in top 15 (I wont say top 10 on purpose) than you. In fact there wasn't any other family besides Aeterna that had more families related to them in top 10 or top 15 from start of the version.
You won version fair and square, but way you did it is laughable to anyone who played this game long enough. Ask any top of family not blooded to you (actually I am sure some that are blooded to you think same just wont say it openly), what they think about your bloodings.
Johnx at 16:58:19 on 18/12:
I said that they weren't top 10 before wars started to happen, which they both were and weren't. When Aeterna blooded them they weren't in top 10, also ascension was part of a pact, count those together and you will see their have quite a lot of strenght, more than some of the other top 10 fams.
* hits the watch
check, your turn
I said that they weren't top 10 before wars started to happen, which they both were and weren't. When Aeterna blooded them they weren't in top 10, also ascension was part of a pact, count those together and you will see their have quite a lot of strenght, more than some of the other top 10 fams.
* hits the watch
check, your turn
I am not anonymous but your points are rather weak.
Being member of Ferrante, Ferrante was never below 13 either in game or on ob news. In fact only time when Ferrante was below 11 was when Jannisary took them over for around day or two. Empire was also top 10 most of the time, same as Lusa (top 10 or around 10), so if you didn't blood top 10 fams you blooded top 15 fams for sure, cause not one of fams you blooded ever fell below number 15.
Also don't take this wrong, but with bloodings you guys did it is insulting to call others pact. Ascencion had 2 bloods when you killed em, and 2 sister fams of who neither one was in top 20 families, and their bloods had only 1 family in top 10 (Jannisary) if we count Ferrante as not top 10 which you do. Again I don't think Justice alliance is good for game, but calling them + Ascencion (+Marazzino?) pact after bloodings you guys did is laughable.
If you're so fast to throw word pact around, name one that was present in this version that you did not blood to? Gravano one - you pretty much destroyed it with blooding 2 old families of it. Turk pact - you blooded Marazzino from there. Only possible ''pact'' you weren't blooded to was Levi - Indelicato - Provenzano. Also any of these ''pacts'' had less bloods in top 15 (I wont say top 10 on purpose) than you. In fact there wasn't any other family besides Aeterna that had more families related to them in top 10 or top 15 from start of the version.
You won version fair and square, but way you did it is laughable to anyone who played this game long enough. Ask any top of family not blooded to you (actually I am sure some that are blooded to you think same just wont say it openly), what they think about your bloodings.
Oh, you're still going on about this? That's cute.
You don't have to agree you know, nobody is asking for your permission. We did what we did with reasons known to us. I see you are talking like you're fully aware of all connections/bloodings/deals going on, believe me, you're not.
'The way you did is laughable' 'Ask any any top of family not blooded to you'
And we should do that because? If there are families working with us not agreeing with what we do they have to do only 1 simple thing and that is /q AnyAeternaTop.
Don't get me wrong, you make a few valid points, but it's very easy to whine and complain about stuff when you aren't actually involved in matters. If it really bothers you so much, bring Vincitori back next version and we will see how you handle it, or are you going to claim now that the 3.3 version wasn't laughable either?
It beats writing endless essays from some kind of high horse when you have been gone for a long time, barely know what's going on, yet still feel righteous enough to QQ about 'the state of the game' just because you had a fam once upon a time.
lol saros...Aeterna is most shameless project iv ever seen in Omerta. When Conflict and Vinci blooded that was the equivalent to you and faffie being bloods this version. Aeterna then went about 10 steps past that mark having something like 8 of top 10 in your bloodlist (including yourself) including non shoot with Impact and Gravano. You can call me mad because we died if you want or so. The game is too small for such faggotry and I don't see what you are so proud of...Well done
Don't be sad that your little plan didn't work (ganging up entire omerta). I know it probably hurts, but it's all good my friend, time heals all wounds.
But when you do decide to mindlessly bash in public, atleast use some facts to back you up next time.
Anonymous (19:34:52 - 18-12)
Anonymous at 19:33:24 on 18/12:
silly argument gode :)
if an idiot steps on a shit, doesnt mean you have to follow and step into the same shit ;)
P.S, sorry for making Johnny an idiot :$
gode at 17:49:23 on 18/12:
well Johnny you always refer to early 3.x versions right? what did change in 3.3? you created a blood-circle by blooding conflict, and started 1 war versions era. after 1 big-bang, bigger blood-circle wins it. you created this shit, now don't complain about it. it is even more smooth gameplay last 2-3 versions, because some main stream fams like righelli-faffie-marazzino choosing different bloods in different versions
Johnny at 14:50:47 on 18/12:
Bloodings, as they're done these days are complete joke. Current number of bloods could work in 2.x or early 3.x versions but with this number of ''active'' players and families, having anything more than 4 bloods is too much. Not to mention amount of as 1 or alliances. While game kept shrinking and player base kept getting smaller blood lists remained same as they were before. Most top families, most big families, don't even consider blooding less amount of fams to keep game open. That is what leads to game being over after 1 big war.
Bloodings, as they're done these days are complete joke. Current number of bloods could work in 2.x or early 3.x versions but with this number of ''active'' players and families, having anything more than 4 bloods is too much. Not to mention amount of as 1 or alliances. While game kept shrinking and player base kept getting smaller blood lists remained same as they were before. Most top families, most big families, don't even consider blooding less amount of fams to keep game open. That is what leads to game being over after 1 big war.
well Johnny you always refer to early 3.x versions right? what did change in 3.3? you created a blood-circle by blooding conflict, and started 1 war versions era. after 1 big-bang, bigger blood-circle wins it. you created this shit, now don't complain about it. it is even more smooth gameplay last 2-3 versions, because some main stream fams like righelli-faffie-marazzino choosing different bloods in different versions
silly argument gode :)
if an idiot steps on a shit, doesnt mean you have to follow and step into the same shit ;)
P.S, sorry for making Johnny an idiot :$
Actually peoole were forced into joining pacts because they got shot by large amounts of families with an even bigger shoot/def ratio.
Anonymous (19:33:24 - 18-12)
gode at 17:49:23 on 18/12:
well Johnny you always refer to early 3.x versions right? what did change in 3.3? you created a blood-circle by blooding conflict, and started 1 war versions era. after 1 big-bang, bigger blood-circle wins it. you created this shit, now don't complain about it. it is even more smooth gameplay last 2-3 versions, because some main stream fams like righelli-faffie-marazzino choosing different bloods in different versions
Johnny at 14:50:47 on 18/12:
Bloodings, as they're done these days are complete joke. Current number of bloods could work in 2.x or early 3.x versions but with this number of ''active'' players and families, having anything more than 4 bloods is too much. Not to mention amount of as 1 or alliances. While game kept shrinking and player base kept getting smaller blood lists remained same as they were before. Most top families, most big families, don't even consider blooding less amount of fams to keep game open. That is what leads to game being over after 1 big war.
Bloodings, as they're done these days are complete joke. Current number of bloods could work in 2.x or early 3.x versions but with this number of ''active'' players and families, having anything more than 4 bloods is too much. Not to mention amount of as 1 or alliances. While game kept shrinking and player base kept getting smaller blood lists remained same as they were before. Most top families, most big families, don't even consider blooding less amount of fams to keep game open. That is what leads to game being over after 1 big war.
well Johnny you always refer to early 3.x versions right? what did change in 3.3? you created a blood-circle by blooding conflict, and started 1 war versions era. after 1 big-bang, bigger blood-circle wins it. you created this shit, now don't complain about it. it is even more smooth gameplay last 2-3 versions, because some main stream fams like righelli-faffie-marazzino choosing different bloods in different versions
silly argument gode :)
if an idiot steps on a shit, doesnt mean you have to follow and step into the same shit ;)
P.S, sorry for making Johnny an idiot :$
Anonymous (19:33:23 - 18-12)
Donalo has no clue. Non shoot agreements? They just shot eachother!
Anonymous (19:32:09 - 18-12)
Anonymous at 16:14:06 on 18/12:
Could you name those tops?
So we can actually judge them later by their actual blooding behaviour and not what they want to do? Talk is cheap afterall.
Johnny at 16:01:42 on 18/12:
I completely agree with your 1st point. People here take everything too personal (hell I was same when I played), but yes that is biggest problem. People need to be able to kill and die without taking it personal, people need to understand that just cause someone shot with you in last 2 wars doesn't have to be your bff for the rest of the game. However I agree this is wishful thinking and that these things are very unlikely to change.
I was on both sides in these situations, part of huge groups and target of large groups, and I completely agree that all families need to be on the same page with this, cause it takes only 1 group and 1 bigger fam to stop this from happening. Families need to be run with desire to enjoy game and have fun playing, instead of run by fear and desire to ''pwn'' everyone else by any cost.
I actually think if families (and I mean all of em) would try this, ''new'' way of playing instead of standard lets blood till we drop, they would have more fun shooting in much more open wars. Dying and reranking would be very viable option, and it could keep game flow going on for much longer than month or two. Of course all this would ask for admin help in all of this, providing good KA and healthy game environment.
Actually I'm really happy that tops from leading fams see this as more interesting way to play game.
Xerano at 15:48:51 on 18/12:
Eventhough I agree that it sounds like something that could be more interesting it's just wishful thinking. The problem lies in people clinging onto the connections they've made over the years, even when they dont blood a fam they refuse to shoot them because they're old friends. In the meantime they're also creating new connections. The other thing that never changes aswell is the 'hate' for certain families. If you have shot someone in 2.X they still use that as a reason to shoot you.
Families have tried to drop the amount of bloods to 3-4 but on the other hand others increase it to 8-9 (Or just add an alliance to their bloodlist while being an alliance themselves like Justice/ASA). This only results in the fam with the least amount of bloods to get gangbanged on in the first war. Being on the receiving end for versions in a row is quite frustrating so obviously you'll explore other ways. People can complain all you want about Aeterna blooding top10 fams only or whatever, but don't forget those fams became top10 fams after Jannisary/Ascenion/Anarchy were killed. .
Eventhough I agree that it sounds like something that could be more interesting it's just wishful thinking. The problem lies in people clinging onto the connections they've made over the years, even when they dont blood a fam they refuse to shoot them because they're old friends. In the meantime they're also creating new connections. The other thing that never changes aswell is the 'hate' for certain families. If you have shot someone in 2.X they still use that as a reason to shoot you.
Families have tried to drop the amount of bloods to 3-4 but on the other hand others increase it to 8-9 (Or just add an alliance to their bloodlist while being an alliance themselves like Justice/ASA). This only results in the fam with the least amount of bloods to get gangbanged on in the first war. Being on the receiving end for versions in a row is quite frustrating so obviously you'll explore other ways. People can complain all you want about Aeterna blooding top10 fams only or whatever, but don't forget those fams became top10 fams after Jannisary/Ascenion/Anarchy were killed. .
I completely agree with your 1st point. People here take everything too personal (hell I was same when I played), but yes that is biggest problem. People need to be able to kill and die without taking it personal, people need to understand that just cause someone shot with you in last 2 wars doesn't have to be your bff for the rest of the game. However I agree this is wishful thinking and that these things are very unlikely to change.
I was on both sides in these situations, part of huge groups and target of large groups, and I completely agree that all families need to be on the same page with this, cause it takes only 1 group and 1 bigger fam to stop this from happening. Families need to be run with desire to enjoy game and have fun playing, instead of run by fear and desire to ''pwn'' everyone else by any cost.
I actually think if families (and I mean all of em) would try this, ''new'' way of playing instead of standard lets blood till we drop, they would have more fun shooting in much more open wars. Dying and reranking would be very viable option, and it could keep game flow going on for much longer than month or two. Of course all this would ask for admin help in all of this, providing good KA and healthy game environment.
Actually I'm really happy that tops from leading fams see this as more interesting way to play game.
Could you name those tops?
So we can actually judge them later by their actual blooding behaviour and not what they want to do? Talk is cheap afterall.
Still waiting for you Johnny.
Come on name them, or did you just make them up to give your argument more substance?
`Donalo`Sixx at 19:20:36 on 18/12:
lol saros...Aeterna is most shameless project iv ever seen in Omerta. When Conflict and Vinci blooded that was the equivalent to you and faffie being bloods this version. Aeterna then went about 10 steps past that mark having something like 8 of top 10 in your bloodlist (including yourself) including non shoot with Impact and Gravano. You can call me mad because we died if you want or so. The game is too small for such faggotry and I don't see what you are so proud of...Well done
Saros`away at 18:01:32 on 18/12:
Oh, you're still going on about this? That's cute.
You don't have to agree you know, nobody is asking for your permission. We did what we did with reasons known to us. I see you are talking like you're fully aware of all connections/bloodings/deals going on, believe me, you're not.
'The way you did is laughable' 'Ask any any top of family not blooded to you'
And we should do that because? If there are families working with us not agreeing with what we do they have to do only 1 simple thing and that is /q AnyAeternaTop.
Don't get me wrong, you make a few valid points, but it's very easy to whine and complain about stuff when you aren't actually involved in matters. If it really bothers you so much, bring Vincitori back next version and we will see how you handle it, or are you going to claim now that the 3.3 version wasn't laughable either?
It beats writing endless essays from some kind of high horse when you have been gone for a long time, barely know what's going on, yet still feel righteous enough to QQ about 'the state of the game' just because you had a fam once upon a time.
Johnny at 17:16:50 on 18/12:
I am not anonymous but your points are rather weak.
Being member of Ferrante, Ferrante was never below 13 either in game or on ob news. In fact only time when Ferrante was below 11 was when Jannisary took them over for around day or two. Empire was also top 10 most of the time, same as Lusa (top 10 or around 10), so if you didn't blood top 10 fams you blooded top 15 fams for sure, cause not one of fams you blooded ever fell below number 15.
Also don't take this wrong, but with bloodings you guys did it is insulting to call others pact. Ascencion had 2 bloods when you killed em, and 2 sister fams of who neither one was in top 20 families, and their bloods had only 1 family in top 10 (Jannisary) if we count Ferrante as not top 10 which you do. Again I don't think Justice alliance is good for game, but calling them + Ascencion (+Marazzino?) pact after bloodings you guys did is laughable.
If you're so fast to throw word pact around, name one that was present in this version that you did not blood to? Gravano one - you pretty much destroyed it with blooding 2 old families of it. Turk pact - you blooded Marazzino from there. Only possible ''pact'' you weren't blooded to was Levi - Indelicato - Provenzano. Also any of these ''pacts'' had less bloods in top 15 (I wont say top 10 on purpose) than you. In fact there wasn't any other family besides Aeterna that had more families related to them in top 10 or top 15 from start of the version.
You won version fair and square, but way you did it is laughable to anyone who played this game long enough. Ask any top of family not blooded to you (actually I am sure some that are blooded to you think same just wont say it openly), what they think about your bloodings.
Johnx at 16:58:19 on 18/12:
I said that they weren't top 10 before wars started to happen, which they both were and weren't. When Aeterna blooded them they weren't in top 10, also ascension was part of a pact, count those together and you will see their have quite a lot of strenght, more than some of the other top 10 fams.
* hits the watch
check, your turn
I said that they weren't top 10 before wars started to happen, which they both were and weren't. When Aeterna blooded them they weren't in top 10, also ascension was part of a pact, count those together and you will see their have quite a lot of strenght, more than some of the other top 10 fams.
* hits the watch
check, your turn
I am not anonymous but your points are rather weak.
Being member of Ferrante, Ferrante was never below 13 either in game or on ob news. In fact only time when Ferrante was below 11 was when Jannisary took them over for around day or two. Empire was also top 10 most of the time, same as Lusa (top 10 or around 10), so if you didn't blood top 10 fams you blooded top 15 fams for sure, cause not one of fams you blooded ever fell below number 15.
Also don't take this wrong, but with bloodings you guys did it is insulting to call others pact. Ascencion had 2 bloods when you killed em, and 2 sister fams of who neither one was in top 20 families, and their bloods had only 1 family in top 10 (Jannisary) if we count Ferrante as not top 10 which you do. Again I don't think Justice alliance is good for game, but calling them + Ascencion (+Marazzino?) pact after bloodings you guys did is laughable.
If you're so fast to throw word pact around, name one that was present in this version that you did not blood to? Gravano one - you pretty much destroyed it with blooding 2 old families of it. Turk pact - you blooded Marazzino from there. Only possible ''pact'' you weren't blooded to was Levi - Indelicato - Provenzano. Also any of these ''pacts'' had less bloods in top 15 (I wont say top 10 on purpose) than you. In fact there wasn't any other family besides Aeterna that had more families related to them in top 10 or top 15 from start of the version.
You won version fair and square, but way you did it is laughable to anyone who played this game long enough. Ask any top of family not blooded to you (actually I am sure some that are blooded to you think same just wont say it openly), what they think about your bloodings.
Oh, you're still going on about this? That's cute.
You don't have to agree you know, nobody is asking for your permission. We did what we did with reasons known to us. I see you are talking like you're fully aware of all connections/bloodings/deals going on, believe me, you're not.
'The way you did is laughable' 'Ask any any top of family not blooded to you'
And we should do that because? If there are families working with us not agreeing with what we do they have to do only 1 simple thing and that is /q AnyAeternaTop.
Don't get me wrong, you make a few valid points, but it's very easy to whine and complain about stuff when you aren't actually involved in matters. If it really bothers you so much, bring Vincitori back next version and we will see how you handle it, or are you going to claim now that the 3.3 version wasn't laughable either?
It beats writing endless essays from some kind of high horse when you have been gone for a long time, barely know what's going on, yet still feel righteous enough to QQ about 'the state of the game' just because you had a fam once upon a time.
lol saros...Aeterna is most shameless project iv ever seen in Omerta. When Conflict and Vinci blooded that was the equivalent to you and faffie being bloods this version. Aeterna then went about 10 steps past that mark having something like 8 of top 10 in your bloodlist (including yourself) including non shoot with Impact and Gravano. You can call me mad because we died if you want or so. The game is too small for such faggotry and I don't see what you are so proud of...Well done
Saros`away at 18:01:32 on 18/12:
Oh, you're still going on about this? That's cute.
You don't have to agree you know, nobody is asking for your permission. We did what we did with reasons known to us. I see you are talking like you're fully aware of all connections/bloodings/deals going on, believe me, you're not.
'The way you did is laughable' 'Ask any any top of family not blooded to you'
And we should do that because? If there are families working with us not agreeing with what we do they have to do only 1 simple thing and that is /q AnyAeternaTop.
Don't get me wrong, you make a few valid points, but it's very easy to whine and complain about stuff when you aren't actually involved in matters. If it really bothers you so much, bring Vincitori back next version and we will see how you handle it, or are you going to claim now that the 3.3 version wasn't laughable either?
It beats writing endless essays from some kind of high horse when you have been gone for a long time, barely know what's going on, yet still feel righteous enough to QQ about 'the state of the game' just because you had a fam once upon a time.
Johnny at 17:16:50 on 18/12:
I am not anonymous but your points are rather weak.
Being member of Ferrante, Ferrante was never below 13 either in game or on ob news. In fact only time when Ferrante was below 11 was when Jannisary took them over for around day or two. Empire was also top 10 most of the time, same as Lusa (top 10 or around 10), so if you didn't blood top 10 fams you blooded top 15 fams for sure, cause not one of fams you blooded ever fell below number 15.
Also don't take this wrong, but with bloodings you guys did it is insulting to call others pact. Ascencion had 2 bloods when you killed em, and 2 sister fams of who neither one was in top 20 families, and their bloods had only 1 family in top 10 (Jannisary) if we count Ferrante as not top 10 which you do. Again I don't think Justice alliance is good for game, but calling them + Ascencion (+Marazzino?) pact after bloodings you guys did is laughable.
If you're so fast to throw word pact around, name one that was present in this version that you did not blood to? Gravano one - you pretty much destroyed it with blooding 2 old families of it. Turk pact - you blooded Marazzino from there. Only possible ''pact'' you weren't blooded to was Levi - Indelicato - Provenzano. Also any of these ''pacts'' had less bloods in top 15 (I wont say top 10 on purpose) than you. In fact there wasn't any other family besides Aeterna that had more families related to them in top 10 or top 15 from start of the version.
You won version fair and square, but way you did it is laughable to anyone who played this game long enough. Ask any top of family not blooded to you (actually I am sure some that are blooded to you think same just wont say it openly), what they think about your bloodings.
Johnx at 16:58:19 on 18/12:
I said that they weren't top 10 before wars started to happen, which they both were and weren't. When Aeterna blooded them they weren't in top 10, also ascension was part of a pact, count those together and you will see their have quite a lot of strenght, more than some of the other top 10 fams.
* hits the watch
check, your turn
I said that they weren't top 10 before wars started to happen, which they both were and weren't. When Aeterna blooded them they weren't in top 10, also ascension was part of a pact, count those together and you will see their have quite a lot of strenght, more than some of the other top 10 fams.
* hits the watch
check, your turn
I am not anonymous but your points are rather weak.
Being member of Ferrante, Ferrante was never below 13 either in game or on ob news. In fact only time when Ferrante was below 11 was when Jannisary took them over for around day or two. Empire was also top 10 most of the time, same as Lusa (top 10 or around 10), so if you didn't blood top 10 fams you blooded top 15 fams for sure, cause not one of fams you blooded ever fell below number 15.
Also don't take this wrong, but with bloodings you guys did it is insulting to call others pact. Ascencion had 2 bloods when you killed em, and 2 sister fams of who neither one was in top 20 families, and their bloods had only 1 family in top 10 (Jannisary) if we count Ferrante as not top 10 which you do. Again I don't think Justice alliance is good for game, but calling them + Ascencion (+Marazzino?) pact after bloodings you guys did is laughable.
If you're so fast to throw word pact around, name one that was present in this version that you did not blood to? Gravano one - you pretty much destroyed it with blooding 2 old families of it. Turk pact - you blooded Marazzino from there. Only possible ''pact'' you weren't blooded to was Levi - Indelicato - Provenzano. Also any of these ''pacts'' had less bloods in top 15 (I wont say top 10 on purpose) than you. In fact there wasn't any other family besides Aeterna that had more families related to them in top 10 or top 15 from start of the version.
You won version fair and square, but way you did it is laughable to anyone who played this game long enough. Ask any top of family not blooded to you (actually I am sure some that are blooded to you think same just wont say it openly), what they think about your bloodings.
Oh, you're still going on about this? That's cute.
You don't have to agree you know, nobody is asking for your permission. We did what we did with reasons known to us. I see you are talking like you're fully aware of all connections/bloodings/deals going on, believe me, you're not.
'The way you did is laughable' 'Ask any any top of family not blooded to you'
And we should do that because? If there are families working with us not agreeing with what we do they have to do only 1 simple thing and that is /q AnyAeternaTop.
Don't get me wrong, you make a few valid points, but it's very easy to whine and complain about stuff when you aren't actually involved in matters. If it really bothers you so much, bring Vincitori back next version and we will see how you handle it, or are you going to claim now that the 3.3 version wasn't laughable either?
It beats writing endless essays from some kind of high horse when you have been gone for a long time, barely know what's going on, yet still feel righteous enough to QQ about 'the state of the game' just because you had a fam once upon a time.
lol saros...Aeterna is most shameless project iv ever seen in Omerta. When Conflict and Vinci blooded that was the equivalent to you and faffie being bloods this version. Aeterna then went about 10 steps past that mark having something like 8 of top 10 in your bloodlist (including yourself) including non shoot with Impact and Gravano. You can call me mad because we died if you want or so. The game is too small for such faggotry and I don't see what you are so proud of...Well done
LOOKING FOR NEW FRIENDS AND FAMILY THAT WILL SKYPE WITH ME AND PUT UP WITH MY EMONESS!!!
Kris at 18:29:03 on 18/12:
Same :') I thought about getting another but what's the point xd
Jordyrp at 18:28:01 on 18/12:
Clicklimit set back
The fact that the version is basically over and I got this message today says enough about how short/bad this version was to be honest. 1 month and it's "over"
Clicklimit set back
The fact that the version is basically over and I got this message today says enough about how short/bad this version was to be honest. 1 month and it's "over"
Same :') I thought about getting another but what's the point xd
Yea exactly, I got 1 from obay cause I had plenty of money left but meh.
Anonymous (18:29:18 - 18-12)
Jordyrp at 18:28:01 on 18/12:
Clicklimit set back
The fact that the version is basically over and I got this message today says enough about how short/bad this version was to be honest. 1 month and it's "over"
Clicklimit set back
The fact that the version is basically over and I got this message today says enough about how short/bad this version was to be honest. 1 month and it's "over"
Anonymous (18:29:10 - 18-12)
Jordyrp at 18:28:01 on 18/12:
Clicklimit set back
The fact that the version is basically over and I got this message today says enough about how short/bad this version was to be honest. 1 month and it's "over"
Clicklimit set back
The fact that the version is basically over and I got this message today says enough about how short/bad this version was to be honest. 1 month and it's "over"
Jordyrp at 18:28:01 on 18/12:
Clicklimit set back
The fact that the version is basically over and I got this message today says enough about how short/bad this version was to be honest. 1 month and it's "over"
Clicklimit set back
The fact that the version is basically over and I got this message today says enough about how short/bad this version was to be honest. 1 month and it's "over"
Same :') I thought about getting another but what's the point xd
Clicklimit set back
The fact that the version is basically over and I got this message today says enough about how short/bad this version was to be honest. 1 month and it's "over"
The fact that the version is basically over and I got this message today says enough about how short/bad this version was to be honest. 1 month and it's "over"
Anonymous (18:23:54 - 18-12)
Xerano at 18:21:14 on 18/12:
Aeterna isnt either Vaffanculo or Righelli. Just because we have tops from both fams and members from both fams doesnt mean we're them. I mean quite frankly not even 3 versions ago we were shooting eachother. If we make our own fams again next time there won't be anything stopping us from shooting eachother again either eventhough we're friends. As far as I know all we did was take a break and try something new last version and guess what? We got gangbanged. We tried it again this version and made a few changes in our blooding and this is the result. Sounds quite familiar to your story doesnt it? About the Inzerillo part.. we only had like 3 of their tops and like 6 members overall playing with us they could've made their own family again but I think you can see why they didn't.
Johnny at 18:10:59 on 18/12:
I never said I am solution. I tried playing as I said in my post, and we got shot with shitload of fams (20+) while we wanted to play open game for everyone (3.2). We got shot for exactly that, heaving least bloods while everyone else had way more.
In 3.3 I didn't care for anything of that, back then already I knew it will be my last version as top and all my bloods knew I just want to win. And that's how I played, I didn't care for good game anymore I just wanted to show all those fams who grouped to shoot us when we tried to play different what grouping leads to. I retired after that, and Conflict and Vincitori retired 1 version after that as well.
I honestly don't care will you guys keep doing this or not, I gave my opinion what's wrong with this game. I believed this was wrong in 3.3 when I did it as well, I wanted change and I tried to be the one, but change never came instead gangbanging came. Honestly I thought after Conflict and Vincitori are gone from the game as 2 families with big influence things will change, and I just saw how wrong I was.
Again your point in't that good. Faffie blooded different yes, Righelli kind of fell apart and joined up with others from what I see (unless you count Aeterna as Righelli, which I again I think is shame to unite big families with history like Vaffanculo, Righelli, Inzerillo and to some extent Fidelitas into huge fam).
Marazzino to my count blooded 8+ fams this version and made 2 sister families, it's not hard to blood different when you blood dozen fams. Marazzino blooded everyone who they worked with + some other fams just in case.
gode at 17:49:23 on 18/12:
well Johnny you always refer to early 3.x versions right? what did change in 3.3? you created a blood-circle by blooding conflict, and started 1 war versions era. after 1 big-bang, bigger blood-circle wins it. you created this shit, now don't complain about it. it is even more smooth gameplay last 2-3 versions, because some main stream fams like righelli-faffie-marazzino choosing different bloods in different versions
Johnny at 14:50:47 on 18/12:
Bloodings, as they're done these days are complete joke. Current number of bloods could work in 2.x or early 3.x versions but with this number of ''active'' players and families, having anything more than 4 bloods is too much. Not to mention amount of as 1 or alliances. While game kept shrinking and player base kept getting smaller blood lists remained same as they were before. Most top families, most big families, don't even consider blooding less amount of fams to keep game open. That is what leads to game being over after 1 big war.
Bloodings, as they're done these days are complete joke. Current number of bloods could work in 2.x or early 3.x versions but with this number of ''active'' players and families, having anything more than 4 bloods is too much. Not to mention amount of as 1 or alliances. While game kept shrinking and player base kept getting smaller blood lists remained same as they were before. Most top families, most big families, don't even consider blooding less amount of fams to keep game open. That is what leads to game being over after 1 big war.
well Johnny you always refer to early 3.x versions right? what did change in 3.3? you created a blood-circle by blooding conflict, and started 1 war versions era. after 1 big-bang, bigger blood-circle wins it. you created this shit, now don't complain about it. it is even more smooth gameplay last 2-3 versions, because some main stream fams like righelli-faffie-marazzino choosing different bloods in different versions
I never said I am solution. I tried playing as I said in my post, and we got shot with shitload of fams (20+) while we wanted to play open game for everyone (3.2). We got shot for exactly that, heaving least bloods while everyone else had way more.
In 3.3 I didn't care for anything of that, back then already I knew it will be my last version as top and all my bloods knew I just want to win. And that's how I played, I didn't care for good game anymore I just wanted to show all those fams who grouped to shoot us when we tried to play different what grouping leads to. I retired after that, and Conflict and Vincitori retired 1 version after that as well.
I honestly don't care will you guys keep doing this or not, I gave my opinion what's wrong with this game. I believed this was wrong in 3.3 when I did it as well, I wanted change and I tried to be the one, but change never came instead gangbanging came. Honestly I thought after Conflict and Vincitori are gone from the game as 2 families with big influence things will change, and I just saw how wrong I was.
Again your point in't that good. Faffie blooded different yes, Righelli kind of fell apart and joined up with others from what I see (unless you count Aeterna as Righelli, which I again I think is shame to unite big families with history like Vaffanculo, Righelli, Inzerillo and to some extent Fidelitas into huge fam).
Marazzino to my count blooded 8+ fams this version and made 2 sister families, it's not hard to blood different when you blood dozen fams. Marazzino blooded everyone who they worked with + some other fams just in case.
Aeterna isnt either Vaffanculo or Righelli. Just because we have tops from both fams and members from both fams doesnt mean we're them. I mean quite frankly not even 3 versions ago we were shooting eachother. If we make our own fams again next time there won't be anything stopping us from shooting eachother again either eventhough we're friends. As far as I know all we did was take a break and try something new last version and guess what? We got gangbanged. We tried it again this version and made a few changes in our blooding and this is the result. Sounds quite familiar to your story doesnt it? About the Inzerillo part.. we only had like 3 of their tops and like 6 members overall playing with us they could've made their own family again but I think you can see why they didn't.
Anonymous (18:22:28 - 18-12)
Johnny at 18:10:59 on 18/12:
I never said I am solution. I tried playing as I said in my post, and we got shot with shitload of fams (20+) while we wanted to play open game for everyone (3.2). We got shot for exactly that, heaving least bloods while everyone else had way more.
In 3.3 I didn't care for anything of that, back then already I knew it will be my last version as top and all my bloods knew I just want to win. And that's how I played, I didn't care for good game anymore I just wanted to show all those fams who grouped to shoot us when we tried to play different what grouping leads to. I retired after that, and Conflict and Vincitori retired 1 version after that as well.
I honestly don't care will you guys keep doing this or not, I gave my opinion what's wrong with this game. I believed this was wrong in 3.3 when I did it as well, I wanted change and I tried to be the one, but change never came instead gangbanging came. Honestly I thought after Conflict and Vincitori are gone from the game as 2 families with big influence things will change, and I just saw how wrong I was.
Again your point in't that good. Faffie blooded different yes, Righelli kind of fell apart and joined up with others from what I see (unless you count Aeterna as Righelli, which I again I think is shame to unite big families with history like Vaffanculo, Righelli, Inzerillo and to some extent Fidelitas into huge fam).
Marazzino to my count blooded 8+ fams this version and made 2 sister families, it's not hard to blood different when you blood dozen fams. Marazzino blooded everyone who they worked with + some other fams just in case.
gode at 17:49:23 on 18/12:
well Johnny you always refer to early 3.x versions right? what did change in 3.3? you created a blood-circle by blooding conflict, and started 1 war versions era. after 1 big-bang, bigger blood-circle wins it. you created this shit, now don't complain about it. it is even more smooth gameplay last 2-3 versions, because some main stream fams like righelli-faffie-marazzino choosing different bloods in different versions
Johnny at 14:50:47 on 18/12:
Bloodings, as they're done these days are complete joke. Current number of bloods could work in 2.x or early 3.x versions but with this number of ''active'' players and families, having anything more than 4 bloods is too much. Not to mention amount of as 1 or alliances. While game kept shrinking and player base kept getting smaller blood lists remained same as they were before. Most top families, most big families, don't even consider blooding less amount of fams to keep game open. That is what leads to game being over after 1 big war.
Bloodings, as they're done these days are complete joke. Current number of bloods could work in 2.x or early 3.x versions but with this number of ''active'' players and families, having anything more than 4 bloods is too much. Not to mention amount of as 1 or alliances. While game kept shrinking and player base kept getting smaller blood lists remained same as they were before. Most top families, most big families, don't even consider blooding less amount of fams to keep game open. That is what leads to game being over after 1 big war.
well Johnny you always refer to early 3.x versions right? what did change in 3.3? you created a blood-circle by blooding conflict, and started 1 war versions era. after 1 big-bang, bigger blood-circle wins it. you created this shit, now don't complain about it. it is even more smooth gameplay last 2-3 versions, because some main stream fams like righelli-faffie-marazzino choosing different bloods in different versions
I never said I am solution. I tried playing as I said in my post, and we got shot with shitload of fams (20+) while we wanted to play open game for everyone (3.2). We got shot for exactly that, heaving least bloods while everyone else had way more.
In 3.3 I didn't care for anything of that, back then already I knew it will be my last version as top and all my bloods knew I just want to win. And that's how I played, I didn't care for good game anymore I just wanted to show all those fams who grouped to shoot us when we tried to play different what grouping leads to. I retired after that, and Conflict and Vincitori retired 1 version after that as well.
I honestly don't care will you guys keep doing this or not, I gave my opinion what's wrong with this game. I believed this was wrong in 3.3 when I did it as well, I wanted change and I tried to be the one, but change never came instead gangbanging came. Honestly I thought after Conflict and Vincitori are gone from the game as 2 families with big influence things will change, and I just saw how wrong I was.
Again your point in't that good. Faffie blooded different yes, Righelli kind of fell apart and joined up with others from what I see (unless you count Aeterna as Righelli, which I again I think is shame to unite big families with history like Vaffanculo, Righelli, Inzerillo and to some extent Fidelitas into huge fam).
Marazzino to my count blooded 8+ fams this version and made 2 sister families, it's not hard to blood different when you blood dozen fams. Marazzino blooded everyone who they worked with + some other fams just in case.
Well due to the shit you created other fams have been stuck getting shot by pacts that grew every single version due to the fact your friends and the enemy pact only tried to outgrow each other.
Now there are families you comment on that are cutting cords from their old pacts you give them criticism instead of telling your old homeboys to get their ass out of their dumb alliances and start blooding families on the chart becsuse that's what the families you whine about DO do.
I can assure you this version will yet again end with less families the average vincitori win ended with.
Johnny at 18:10:59 on 18/12:
I never said I am solution. I tried playing as I said in my post, and we got shot with shitload of fams (20+) while we wanted to play open game for everyone (3.2). We got shot for exactly that, heaving least bloods while everyone else had way more.
In 3.3 I didn't care for anything of that, back then already I knew it will be my last version as top and all my bloods knew I just want to win. And that's how I played, I didn't care for good game anymore I just wanted to show all those fams who grouped to shoot us when we tried to play different what grouping leads to. I retired after that, and Conflict and Vincitori retired 1 version after that as well.
I honestly don't care will you guys keep doing this or not, I gave my opinion what's wrong with this game. I believed this was wrong in 3.3 when I did it as well, I wanted change and I tried to be the one, but change never came instead gangbanging came. Honestly I thought after Conflict and Vincitori are gone from the game as 2 families with big influence things will change, and I just saw how wrong I was.
Again your point in't that good. Faffie blooded different yes, Righelli kind of fell apart and joined up with others from what I see (unless you count Aeterna as Righelli, which I again I think is shame to unite big families with history like Vaffanculo, Righelli, Inzerillo and to some extent Fidelitas into huge fam).
Marazzino to my count blooded 8+ fams this version and made 2 sister families, it's not hard to blood different when you blood dozen fams. Marazzino blooded everyone who they worked with + some other fams just in case.
gode at 17:49:23 on 18/12:
well Johnny you always refer to early 3.x versions right? what did change in 3.3? you created a blood-circle by blooding conflict, and started 1 war versions era. after 1 big-bang, bigger blood-circle wins it. you created this shit, now don't complain about it. it is even more smooth gameplay last 2-3 versions, because some main stream fams like righelli-faffie-marazzino choosing different bloods in different versions
Johnny at 14:50:47 on 18/12:
Bloodings, as they're done these days are complete joke. Current number of bloods could work in 2.x or early 3.x versions but with this number of ''active'' players and families, having anything more than 4 bloods is too much. Not to mention amount of as 1 or alliances. While game kept shrinking and player base kept getting smaller blood lists remained same as they were before. Most top families, most big families, don't even consider blooding less amount of fams to keep game open. That is what leads to game being over after 1 big war.
Bloodings, as they're done these days are complete joke. Current number of bloods could work in 2.x or early 3.x versions but with this number of ''active'' players and families, having anything more than 4 bloods is too much. Not to mention amount of as 1 or alliances. While game kept shrinking and player base kept getting smaller blood lists remained same as they were before. Most top families, most big families, don't even consider blooding less amount of fams to keep game open. That is what leads to game being over after 1 big war.
well Johnny you always refer to early 3.x versions right? what did change in 3.3? you created a blood-circle by blooding conflict, and started 1 war versions era. after 1 big-bang, bigger blood-circle wins it. you created this shit, now don't complain about it. it is even more smooth gameplay last 2-3 versions, because some main stream fams like righelli-faffie-marazzino choosing different bloods in different versions
I never said I am solution. I tried playing as I said in my post, and we got shot with shitload of fams (20+) while we wanted to play open game for everyone (3.2). We got shot for exactly that, heaving least bloods while everyone else had way more.
In 3.3 I didn't care for anything of that, back then already I knew it will be my last version as top and all my bloods knew I just want to win. And that's how I played, I didn't care for good game anymore I just wanted to show all those fams who grouped to shoot us when we tried to play different what grouping leads to. I retired after that, and Conflict and Vincitori retired 1 version after that as well.
I honestly don't care will you guys keep doing this or not, I gave my opinion what's wrong with this game. I believed this was wrong in 3.3 when I did it as well, I wanted change and I tried to be the one, but change never came instead gangbanging came. Honestly I thought after Conflict and Vincitori are gone from the game as 2 families with big influence things will change, and I just saw how wrong I was.
Again your point in't that good. Faffie blooded different yes, Righelli kind of fell apart and joined up with others from what I see (unless you count Aeterna as Righelli, which I again I think is shame to unite big families with history like Vaffanculo, Righelli, Inzerillo and to some extent Fidelitas into huge fam).
Marazzino to my count blooded 8+ fams this version and made 2 sister families, it's not hard to blood different when you blood dozen fams. Marazzino blooded everyone who they worked with + some other fams just in case.
Aeterna isnt either Vaffanculo or Righelli. Just because we have tops from both fams and members from both fams doesnt mean we're them. I mean quite frankly not even 3 versions ago we were shooting eachother. If we make our own fams again next time there won't be anything stopping us from shooting eachother again either eventhough we're friends. As far as I know all we did was take a break and try something new last version and guess what? We got gangbanged. We tried it again this version and made a few changes in our blooding and this is the result. Sounds quite familiar to your story doesnt it? About the Inzerillo part.. we only had like 3 of their tops and like 6 members overall playing with us they could've made their own family again but I think you can see why they didn't.
gode at 17:49:23 on 18/12:
well Johnny you always refer to early 3.x versions right? what did change in 3.3? you created a blood-circle by blooding conflict, and started 1 war versions era. after 1 big-bang, bigger blood-circle wins it. you created this shit, now don't complain about it. it is even more smooth gameplay last 2-3 versions, because some main stream fams like righelli-faffie-marazzino choosing different bloods in different versions
Johnny at 14:50:47 on 18/12:
Bloodings, as they're done these days are complete joke. Current number of bloods could work in 2.x or early 3.x versions but with this number of ''active'' players and families, having anything more than 4 bloods is too much. Not to mention amount of as 1 or alliances. While game kept shrinking and player base kept getting smaller blood lists remained same as they were before. Most top families, most big families, don't even consider blooding less amount of fams to keep game open. That is what leads to game being over after 1 big war.
Bloodings, as they're done these days are complete joke. Current number of bloods could work in 2.x or early 3.x versions but with this number of ''active'' players and families, having anything more than 4 bloods is too much. Not to mention amount of as 1 or alliances. While game kept shrinking and player base kept getting smaller blood lists remained same as they were before. Most top families, most big families, don't even consider blooding less amount of fams to keep game open. That is what leads to game being over after 1 big war.
well Johnny you always refer to early 3.x versions right? what did change in 3.3? you created a blood-circle by blooding conflict, and started 1 war versions era. after 1 big-bang, bigger blood-circle wins it. you created this shit, now don't complain about it. it is even more smooth gameplay last 2-3 versions, because some main stream fams like righelli-faffie-marazzino choosing different bloods in different versions
I never said I am solution. I tried playing as I said in my post, and we got shot with shitload of fams while we wanted to play open game for everyone (3.2). We got shot for exactly that, heaving least bloods while everyone else had way more.
In 3.3 I didn't care for anything of that, back then already I knew it will be my last version as top and all my bloods knew I just want to win. And that's how I played, I didn't care for good game anymore I just wanted to show all those fams who grouped to shoot us when we tried to play different what grouping leads to. I retired after that, and Conflict and Vincitori retired 1 version after that as well.
I honestly don't care will you guys keep doing this or not, I gave my opinion what's wrong with this game. I believed this was wrong in 3.3 when I did it as well, I wanted change and I tried to be the one, but change never came instead gangbanging came. Honestly I thought after Conflict and Vincitori are gone from the game as 2 families with big influence things will change, and I just saw how wrong I was.
Again your point in't that good. Faffie blooded different yes, Righelli kind of fell apart and joined up with others from what I see (unless you count Aeterna as Righelli, which I again I think is shame to unite big families with history like Vaffanculo, Righelli, Inzerillo and to some extent Fidelitas into huge fam).
Marazzino to my count blooded 8+ fams this version and made 2 sister families, it's not hard to blood different when you blood dozen fams. Marazzino blooded everyone who they worked with + some other fams just in case.
Johnny at 17:16:50 on 18/12:
I am not anonymous but your points are rather weak.
Being member of Ferrante, Ferrante was never below 13 either in game or on ob news. In fact only time when Ferrante was below 11 was when Jannisary took them over for around day or two. Empire was also top 10 most of the time, same as Lusa (top 10 or around 10), so if you didn't blood top 10 fams you blooded top 15 fams for sure, cause not one of fams you blooded ever fell below number 15.
Also don't take this wrong, but with bloodings you guys did it is insulting to call others pact. Ascencion had 2 bloods when you killed em, and 2 sister fams of who neither one was in top 20 families, and their bloods had only 1 family in top 10 (Jannisary) if we count Ferrante as not top 10 which you do. Again I don't think Justice alliance is good for game, but calling them + Ascencion (+Marazzino?) pact after bloodings you guys did is laughable.
If you're so fast to throw word pact around, name one that was present in this version that you did not blood to? Gravano one - you pretty much destroyed it with blooding 2 old families of it. Turk pact - you blooded Marazzino from there. Only possible ''pact'' you weren't blooded to was Levi - Indelicato - Provenzano. Also any of these ''pacts'' had less bloods in top 15 (I wont say top 10 on purpose) than you. In fact there wasn't any other family besides Aeterna that had more families related to them in top 10 or top 15 from start of the version.
You won version fair and square, but way you did it is laughable to anyone who played this game long enough. Ask any top of family not blooded to you (actually I am sure some that are blooded to you think same just wont say it openly), what they think about your bloodings.
Johnx at 16:58:19 on 18/12:
I said that they weren't top 10 before wars started to happen, which they both were and weren't. When Aeterna blooded them they weren't in top 10, also ascension was part of a pact, count those together and you will see their have quite a lot of strenght, more than some of the other top 10 fams.
* hits the watch
check, your turn
I said that they weren't top 10 before wars started to happen, which they both were and weren't. When Aeterna blooded them they weren't in top 10, also ascension was part of a pact, count those together and you will see their have quite a lot of strenght, more than some of the other top 10 fams.
* hits the watch
check, your turn
I am not anonymous but your points are rather weak.
Being member of Ferrante, Ferrante was never below 13 either in game or on ob news. In fact only time when Ferrante was below 11 was when Jannisary took them over for around day or two. Empire was also top 10 most of the time, same as Lusa (top 10 or around 10), so if you didn't blood top 10 fams you blooded top 15 fams for sure, cause not one of fams you blooded ever fell below number 15.
Also don't take this wrong, but with bloodings you guys did it is insulting to call others pact. Ascencion had 2 bloods when you killed em, and 2 sister fams of who neither one was in top 20 families, and their bloods had only 1 family in top 10 (Jannisary) if we count Ferrante as not top 10 which you do. Again I don't think Justice alliance is good for game, but calling them + Ascencion (+Marazzino?) pact after bloodings you guys did is laughable.
If you're so fast to throw word pact around, name one that was present in this version that you did not blood to? Gravano one - you pretty much destroyed it with blooding 2 old families of it. Turk pact - you blooded Marazzino from there. Only possible ''pact'' you weren't blooded to was Levi - Indelicato - Provenzano. Also any of these ''pacts'' had less bloods in top 15 (I wont say top 10 on purpose) than you. In fact there wasn't any other family besides Aeterna that had more families related to them in top 10 or top 15 from start of the version.
You won version fair and square, but way you did it is laughable to anyone who played this game long enough. Ask any top of family not blooded to you (actually I am sure some that are blooded to you think same just wont say it openly), what they think about your bloodings.
Oh, you're still going on about this? That's cute.
You don't have to agree you know, nobody is asking for your permission. We did what we did with reasons known to us. I see you are talking like you're fully aware of all connections/bloodings/deals going on, believe me, you're not.
'The way you did is laughable' 'Ask any any top of family not blooded to you'
And we should do that because? If there are families working with us not agreeing with what we do they have to do only 1 simple thing and that is /q AnyAeternaTop.
Don't get me wrong, you make a few valid points, but it's very easy to whine and complain about stuff when you aren't actually involved in matters. If it really bothers you so much, bring Vincitori back next version and we will see how you handle it, or are you going to claim now that the 3.3 version wasn't laughable either?
It beats writing endless essays from some kind of high horse when you have been gone for a long time, barely know what's going on, yet still feel righteous enough to QQ about 'the state of the game' just because you had a fam once upon a time.
Anonymous (18:00:02 - 18-12)
gode at 17:49:23 on 18/12:
well Johnny you always refer to early 3.x versions right? what did change in 3.3? you created a blood-circle by blooding conflict, and started 1 war versions era. after 1 big-bang, bigger blood-circle wins it. you created this shit, now don't complain about it. it is even more smooth gameplay last 2-3 versions, because some main stream fams like righelli-faffie-marazzino choosing different bloods in different versions
Johnny at 14:50:47 on 18/12:
Bloodings, as they're done these days are complete joke. Current number of bloods could work in 2.x or early 3.x versions but with this number of ''active'' players and families, having anything more than 4 bloods is too much. Not to mention amount of as 1 or alliances. While game kept shrinking and player base kept getting smaller blood lists remained same as they were before. Most top families, most big families, don't even consider blooding less amount of fams to keep game open. That is what leads to game being over after 1 big war.
Bloodings, as they're done these days are complete joke. Current number of bloods could work in 2.x or early 3.x versions but with this number of ''active'' players and families, having anything more than 4 bloods is too much. Not to mention amount of as 1 or alliances. While game kept shrinking and player base kept getting smaller blood lists remained same as they were before. Most top families, most big families, don't even consider blooding less amount of fams to keep game open. That is what leads to game being over after 1 big war.
well Johnny you always refer to early 3.x versions right? what did change in 3.3? you created a blood-circle by blooding conflict, and started 1 war versions era. after 1 big-bang, bigger blood-circle wins it. you created this shit, now don't complain about it. it is even more smooth gameplay last 2-3 versions, because some main stream fams like righelli-faffie-marazzino choosing different bloods in different versions
+1
Bloodings, as they're done these days are complete joke. Current number of bloods could work in 2.x or early 3.x versions but with this number of ''active'' players and families, having anything more than 4 bloods is too much. Not to mention amount of as 1 or alliances. While game kept shrinking and player base kept getting smaller blood lists remained same as they were before. Most top families, most big families, don't even consider blooding less amount of fams to keep game open. That is what leads to game being over after 1 big war.
well Johnny you always refer to early 3.x versions right? what did change in 3.3? you created a blood-circle by blooding conflict, and started 1 war versions era. after 1 big-bang, bigger blood-circle wins it. you created this shit, now don't complain about it. it is even more smooth gameplay last 2-3 versions, because some main stream fams like righelli-faffie-marazzino choosing different bloods in different versions
silly argument gode :)
if an idiot steps on a shit, doesnt mean you have to follow and step into the same shit ;)
P.S, sorry for making Johnny an idiot :$
Actually peoole were forced into joining pacts because they got shot by large amounts of families with an even bigger shoot/def ratio.
You mean the original pact that contained around 40% of all the active accounts? Yes, I could see how they were totally outnumbered. And no, I don't think the percentage has actually dropped significantly.