» Menu
» OB/Site News
» Articles
 |
» Barafranca News
 |
|
article
General Comments & Major Rumors section.
Everyone knows where this section is for, keep it clean from flaming and only posts in english are allowed.
Everyone knows where this section is for, keep it clean from flaming and only posts in english are allowed.
Anonymous (00:02:50 - 13-02)
Anonymous (22:13:05 - 12-02)
Anonymous at 18:02:43 on 12/02:
It's just such a shame how most of the last several versions can't really have a winner anymore due to the high amount of cheats being used. Admins hand out akills only now and then and it seems they only do it if not too many people have to be revived as a result of that.
Final result of that is that those who do get a revive (a handful) become useless revives and can't have any influence on the outcome of the version. What can 3 famless brugs do so to say. Most of the times these revives are just shot down immediately after their revive. The families left standing after such akills are only standing because of the fact that they benefited from their cheating friends.
I'm starting to think it might just be best to akill and ban players who are notorious for cheating. 3 strikes you're out forever?
It's just such a shame how most of the last several versions can't really have a winner anymore due to the high amount of cheats being used. Admins hand out akills only now and then and it seems they only do it if not too many people have to be revived as a result of that.
Final result of that is that those who do get a revive (a handful) become useless revives and can't have any influence on the outcome of the version. What can 3 famless brugs do so to say. Most of the times these revives are just shot down immediately after their revive. The families left standing after such akills are only standing because of the fact that they benefited from their cheating friends.
I'm starting to think it might just be best to akill and ban players who are notorious for cheating. 3 strikes you're out forever?
You want to play a version with 3 small families in the future?
This game has never been, and will never be cheat free.
That's one of the facts of life, like the sun is rising in the east, and sets in the west.
Anonymous (21:59:23 - 12-02)
Reset O meter is on, no shit Sherlock, u make Siberia win then reset, fucking window licking Hull City Admin wanking Basterds
Anonymous (21:54:11 - 12-02)
Basically saying Persico should of won version but they have not.
Rip all fams but Persico and yes we all know about your bloods (which did want to shoot you) have won this version.
But,
Your dead because of cheaters ,
Ha ha
Rip all fams but Persico and yes we all know about your bloods (which did want to shoot you) have won this version.
But,
Your dead because of cheaters ,
Ha ha
Anonymous (21:43:35 - 12-02)
Polycarpus at 18:37:46 on 12/02:
Why always me?
Why always me?
Polycarpus at 18:37:46 on 12/02:
Why always me?
Why always me?
Anonymous (18:02:43 - 12-02)
It's just such a shame how most of the last several versions can't really have a winner anymore due to the high amount of cheats being used. Admins hand out akills only now and then and it seems they only do it if not too many people have to be revived as a result of that.
Final result of that is that those who do get a revive (a handful) become useless revives and can't have any influence on the outcome of the version. What can 3 famless brugs do so to say. Most of the times these revives are just shot down immediately after their revive. The families left standing after such akills are only standing because of the fact that they benefited from their cheating friends.
I'm starting to think it might just be best to akill and ban players who are notorious for cheating. 3 strikes you're out forever?
Final result of that is that those who do get a revive (a handful) become useless revives and can't have any influence on the outcome of the version. What can 3 famless brugs do so to say. Most of the times these revives are just shot down immediately after their revive. The families left standing after such akills are only standing because of the fact that they benefited from their cheating friends.
I'm starting to think it might just be best to akill and ban players who are notorious for cheating. 3 strikes you're out forever?
Anonymous (16:37:21 - 12-02)
Amproof at 12:39:40 on 12/02:
"As well as the fact that sometimes they appear to specifically wait till 3 days after a war to akill, preventing all revives #conspiracytheory"
I'm one of the most logical people around, but yeah it is getting suspicious.... I'm actually really pissed. On the counter side maybe they just didn't have proof until now.
"As well as the fact that sometimes they appear to specifically wait till 3 days after a war to akill, preventing all revives #conspiracytheory"
I'm one of the most logical people around, but yeah it is getting suspicious.... I'm actually really pissed. On the counter side maybe they just didn't have proof until now.
You are religious.
Ah, you said logical not reasonable. Objection withdrawn. :)
grannnqe (16:35:44 - 12-02)
grannnqe at 16:33:52 on 12/02:
Fucking cheator
Fucking cheator
grannnqe (16:33:52 - 12-02)
Fucking cheator
Critycal at 14:31:21 on 12/02:
Redspeert at 14:25:06 on 12/02:
No it doesn't, but looking at what you said that it ' doesn't make much of a difference since you were as1 ' you are clearly taking credit for Cartagena's play and victory. Hence you won by cheating.
No it doesn't, but looking at what you said that it ' doesn't make much of a difference since you were as1 ' you are clearly taking credit for Cartagena's play and victory. Hence you won by cheating.
Redspeert at 14:25:06 on 12/02:
No it doesn't, but looking at what you said that it ' doesn't make much of a difference since you were as1 ' you are clearly taking credit for Cartagena's play and victory. Hence you won by cheating.
No it doesn't, but looking at what you said that it ' doesn't make much of a difference since you were as1 ' you are clearly taking credit for Cartagena's play and victory. Hence you won by cheating.
Critycal at 14:16:47 on 12/02:
Ah yes, because a cheating as1 means you're cheating aswell.
Anonymous at 14:13:20 on 12/02:
You kinda make fun of yourself there. Means you 'won' the version by cheating. I hope there won't be a HoF at all because of the impact those accounts had during the complete version.
Critycal at 14:00:03 on 12/02:
Siberia & Cartagena were as1, so it doesn't make much of a difference now, does it?
Siberia & Cartagena were as1, so it doesn't make much of a difference now, does it?
You kinda make fun of yourself there. Means you 'won' the version by cheating. I hope there won't be a HoF at all because of the impact those accounts had during the complete version.
Redspeert at 14:14:47 on 12/02:
Ah so you won by not only backstabbing your bloods but also cheating.
ggwp
Critycal at 14:00:03 on 12/02:
Siberia & Cartagena were as1, so it doesn't make much of a difference now, does it?
Siberia & Cartagena were as1, so it doesn't make much of a difference now, does it?
Ah so you won by not only backstabbing your bloods but also cheating.
ggwp
Ah yes, because a cheating as1 means you're cheating aswell.
No it doesn't, but looking at what you said that it ' doesn't make much of a difference since you were as1 ' you are clearly taking credit for Cartagena's play and victory. Hence you won by cheating.
Anonymous at 14:13:20 on 12/02:
You kinda make fun of yourself there. Means you 'won' the version by cheating. I hope there won't be a HoF at all because of the impact those accounts had during the complete version.
Critycal at 14:00:03 on 12/02:
Siberia & Cartagena were as1, so it doesn't make much of a difference now, does it?
Siberia & Cartagena were as1, so it doesn't make much of a difference now, does it?
You kinda make fun of yourself there. Means you 'won' the version by cheating. I hope there won't be a HoF at all because of the impact those accounts had during the complete version.
Redspeert at 14:14:47 on 12/02:
Ah so you won by not only backstabbing your bloods but also cheating.
ggwp
Critycal at 14:00:03 on 12/02:
Siberia & Cartagena were as1, so it doesn't make much of a difference now, does it?
Siberia & Cartagena were as1, so it doesn't make much of a difference now, does it?
Ah so you won by not only backstabbing your bloods but also cheating.
ggwp
Ah yes, because a cheating as1 means you're cheating aswell.
Critycal at 14:00:03 on 12/02:
Siberia & Cartagena were as1, so it doesn't make much of a difference now, does it?
Siberia & Cartagena were as1, so it doesn't make much of a difference now, does it?
Ah so you won by not only backstabbing your bloods but also cheating.
ggwp
Anonymous (14:13:20 - 12-02)
Critycal at 14:00:03 on 12/02:
Siberia & Cartagena were as1, so it doesn't make much of a difference now, does it?
Siberia & Cartagena were as1, so it doesn't make much of a difference now, does it?
You kinda make fun of yourself there. Means you 'won' the version by cheating. I hope there won't be a HoF at all because of the impact those accounts had during the complete version.
Anonymous (14:10:04 - 12-02)
Amproof at 12:39:40 on 12/02:
"As well as the fact that sometimes they appear to specifically wait till 3 days after a war to akill, preventing all revives #conspiracytheory"
I'm one of the most logical people around, but yeah it is getting suspicious.... I'm actually really pissed. On the counter side maybe they just didn't have proof until now.
"As well as the fact that sometimes they appear to specifically wait till 3 days after a war to akill, preventing all revives #conspiracytheory"
I'm one of the most logical people around, but yeah it is getting suspicious.... I'm actually really pissed. On the counter side maybe they just didn't have proof until now.
+1
Siberia & Cartagena were as1, so it doesn't make much of a difference now, does it?
Hemaworst (13:41:01 - 12-02)
Aart at 12:24:48 on 12/02:
Grats Siberia, ggwp.
Grats Siberia, ggwp.
less is more :')
It's just such a shame how most of the last several versions can't really have a winner anymore due to the high amount of cheats being used. Admins hand out akills only now and then and it seems they only do it if not too many people have to be revived as a result of that.
Final result of that is that those who do get a revive (a handful) become useless revives and can't have any influence on the outcome of the version. What can 3 famless brugs do so to say. Most of the times these revives are just shot down immediately after their revive. The families left standing after such akills are only standing because of the fact that they benefited from their cheating friends.
I'm starting to think it might just be best to akill and ban players who are notorious for cheating. 3 strikes you're out forever?
You want to play a version with 3 small families in the future?
This game has never been, and will never be cheat free.
That's one of the facts of life, like the sun is rising in the east, and sets in the west.
I'm cool with that. I'm talking about 3 strikes. If you're dumb enough to keep on cheating knowing you have one more chance before getting banned, then you deserve to be banned. Fact is, the cheaters make the game boring to play for non-cheaters. Legit people quit too because of cheaters