» Menu
» OB/Site News
» Articles
 |
» Barafranca News
No news found. Reset in progress?
Nuke
| Registered: | 22:56:22 on 12-02-2014 (4500d 10h 4m 59s ago) |
| Role: |
Member
|
| Last activity: | 22:56:23 on 05-08-2015 (3961d 10h 4m 58s ago) |
| Country: |  United States |
| Comment count: | 280 (0.06 per day) |
| Quotes added: | 0 |
| Credits: | 10.00 |
| Placed bets: | 15 (5 won / 10 lost / 0 pending) |
26-07 Overture?
01:07:09 - 27-07
17-07 First up! And uhm.. Down?
03:00:00 - 18-07
MurderInc at 01:46:07 on 18/07:
Your talent for completely missing the point while also coming up with ridiculous conclusions is amazing.
Nuke at 00:56:35 on 18/07:
So someone has to be in the wrong before another person can point a finger at him? I'm pointing my finger at you now.. You're a cheater!
Come on, if 200 people wrote to Bramblerose that you were cheating, she'd find a reason to admin kill you. If the admins had a formula or actual proof that cheating was going on, they wouldn't have to manually check. There would be a script for it.
MurderInc at 20:49:15 on 17/07:
Claiming we had you reported is laughable. Reported for what? I thought you were legit?
Claiming we had you reported is laughable. Reported for what? I thought you were legit?
So someone has to be in the wrong before another person can point a finger at him? I'm pointing my finger at you now.. You're a cheater!
Come on, if 200 people wrote to Bramblerose that you were cheating, she'd find a reason to admin kill you. If the admins had a formula or actual proof that cheating was going on, they wouldn't have to manually check. There would be a script for it.
I'm not the one missing the point here. If I must catch you up to speed, I used rhetoric to highlight your fallacy.
Your logic is unsound.. That is all. Don't be upset.
17-07 First up! And uhm.. Down?
00:56:35 - 18-07
MurderInc at 20:49:15 on 17/07:
Claiming we had you reported is laughable. Reported for what? I thought you were legit?
Claiming we had you reported is laughable. Reported for what? I thought you were legit?
So someone has to be in the wrong before another person can point a finger at him? I'm pointing my finger at you now.. You're a cheater!
Come on, if 200 people wrote to Bramblerose that you were cheating, she'd find a reason to admin kill you. If the admins had a formula or actual proof that cheating was going on, they wouldn't have to manually check. There would be a script for it.
04-07 The Stabbening
03:31:10 - 08-07
First real win Siberia has had. Congratulations on your politics, but you still had to kill a blood to pull it off. Better, but not great.
25-06 Nothing New
21:13:12 - 25-06
If Righelli is a blood of Renewal, they could save them.. However, it's not going to happen if Renewal does not get online and start shooting back. If I had 60 brugs, I'd get everyone online, hire and shoot everyone that was online with 4 attack bg's. A war of attrition can be won by a family that size.
Smaller families will only help a team like Renewal if they're ready to come online and finish the job.
Smaller families will only help a team like Renewal if they're ready to come online and finish the job.
So many people shooting Lusa :o
We have only 2 bloods guys calm down. No mass blooding from here \o/
How many people are shooting Lusa?