» Menu
» OB/Site News
» Articles
» Barafranca News
No news found. Reset in progress?
 |
|
article
General Comments & Major Rumors section.
Everyone knows where this section is for, keep it clean from flaming and only posts in english are allowed.
Everyone knows where this section is for, keep it clean from flaming and only posts in english are allowed.
Anonymous (12:01:45 - 14-07)
Anonymous (11:39:13 - 14-07)
maraz and inzerillo tonight kill gelibolu they not have blood
Anonymous (09:52:36 - 14-07)
Kaw at 03:19:02 on 14/07:
damn.. I slept.. :( too bad I almost died!
Jordyrp at 23:22:05 on 13/07:
Okay
Anonymous at 22:25:34 on 13/07:
Dont sleep righelli if you sleep you will be die :) fuckin dumbs aahahah they so scared :) not sleep ahahaha
Dont sleep righelli if you sleep you will be die :) fuckin dumbs aahahah they so scared :) not sleep ahahaha
Okay
Anonymous (07:39:14 - 14-07)
Anonymous at 00:37:33 on 14/07:
To be honoust i think even if you are nr 2 this very strange as i can't believe your real high in your RP(over 100%). In my believe's any burg under 100% should be killable by a chief who shoots 60k and has BG's on full attack. That the chief then also die in your bf is good but not go down on 60k with the setup you told(your bg's all attack) is very strange and will create an enormous hug version. And if there are wars it will be at least 5:1 ratio as defender is way overpowered
Ravenger at 17:04:40 on 13/07:
well i was #2 overall..
Arcanine at 16:55:04 on 13/07:
Then the Chief must have messed up with his bodyguards. A decent chief who shoots 60k with attacking bodyguard wiould have killed you easily if you were full attack.
Ravenger at 16:29:01 on 13/07:
Well i'm a brug, was trained full attack, offline in not my home city, not in villa etc. Got shot by a chief with 60k bullets, survived and killed him in BF. To me, that makes brugs seem a lot stronger than chiefs when defending, but not when attacking.
Well i'm a brug, was trained full attack, offline in not my home city, not in villa etc. Got shot by a chief with 60k bullets, survived and killed him in BF. To me, that makes brugs seem a lot stronger than chiefs when defending, but not when attacking.
Then the Chief must have messed up with his bodyguards. A decent chief who shoots 60k with attacking bodyguard wiould have killed you easily if you were full attack.
well i was #2 overall..
To be honoust i think even if you are nr 2 this very strange as i can't believe your real high in your RP(over 100%). In my believe's any burg under 100% should be killable by a chief who shoots 60k and has BG's on full attack. That the chief then also die in your bf is good but not go down on 60k with the setup you told(your bg's all attack) is very strange and will create an enormous hug version. And if there are wars it will be at least 5:1 ratio as defender is way overpowered
looking at last wars the ratio was already 5:1 so nothing changes really
Jordyrp at 23:22:05 on 13/07:
Okay
Anonymous at 22:25:34 on 13/07:
Dont sleep righelli if you sleep you will be die :) fuckin dumbs aahahah they so scared :) not sleep ahahaha
Dont sleep righelli if you sleep you will be die :) fuckin dumbs aahahah they so scared :) not sleep ahahaha
Okay
Anonymous (00:37:33 - 14-07)
Ravenger at 17:04:40 on 13/07:
well i was #2 overall..
Arcanine at 16:55:04 on 13/07:
Then the Chief must have messed up with his bodyguards. A decent chief who shoots 60k with attacking bodyguard wiould have killed you easily if you were full attack.
Ravenger at 16:29:01 on 13/07:
Well i'm a brug, was trained full attack, offline in not my home city, not in villa etc. Got shot by a chief with 60k bullets, survived and killed him in BF. To me, that makes brugs seem a lot stronger than chiefs when defending, but not when attacking.
Well i'm a brug, was trained full attack, offline in not my home city, not in villa etc. Got shot by a chief with 60k bullets, survived and killed him in BF. To me, that makes brugs seem a lot stronger than chiefs when defending, but not when attacking.
Then the Chief must have messed up with his bodyguards. A decent chief who shoots 60k with attacking bodyguard wiould have killed you easily if you were full attack.
well i was #2 overall..
To be honoust i think even if you are nr 2 this very strange as i can't believe your real high in your RP(over 100%). In my believe's any burg under 100% should be killable by a chief who shoots 60k and has BG's on full attack. That the chief then also die in your bf is good but not go down on 60k with the setup you told(your bg's all attack) is very strange and will create an enormous hug version. And if there are wars it will be at least 5:1 ratio as defender is way overpowered
Anonymous at 22:25:34 on 13/07:
Dont sleep righelli if you sleep you will be die :) fuckin dumbs aahahah they so scared :) not sleep ahahaha
Dont sleep righelli if you sleep you will be die :) fuckin dumbs aahahah they so scared :) not sleep ahahaha
Okay
Anonymous (22:25:34 - 13-07)
Dont sleep righelli if you sleep you will be die :) fuckin dumbs aahahah they so scared :) not sleep ahahaha
Anonymous (21:46:27 - 13-07)
will the pb and bj work this version?
Bring back 2.3 ka we want old ka back..
Similar Ka returns wars look identical like 2.3-2.4 wars with massive backfires.
Omfg this KA what is this shit
Retired..
- Make up your minds!
Similar Ka returns wars look identical like 2.3-2.4 wars with massive backfires.
Omfg this KA what is this shit
Retired..
- Make up your minds!
Anonymous (20:12:21 - 13-07)
there be a storm brewing tonight...all those in Balti get to a safehouse
Anonymous (17:12:15 - 13-07)
Fenrir at 13:37:21 on 13/07:
Thanks for the publicity. :-) Anyways we have seen too many near impossible BFs. We have heard bulletcounts should be worth more etc. Last night for example i shot a chief with 1300 bulletpos and 1.5% onlinetime. He would have max 30k bullets or so if im not entirely mistaken. I survived with 1 health, minus 3bgs and 1 suit. While i was #44 rp and #13 bullets. If the time i(and others) invest in this game, simply doesnt matter, its no fucking point doing so anymore. I could do equal damage barely being online, just fixing lackeys from time to time.
Lets all start collecting flowers. This shooting doesnt do anyone good :''')
Anonymous at 13:17:38 on 13/07:
Chief on Chief, shooter att trained, 17k preshot -> BF kill
Brug on the same Chief shortly after that -> BF kill
Brug: RP: #44, Bullets: #13
Chief: RP: #242, Bullets: #231
Move along folks, nothing to see here!
Chief on Chief, shooter att trained, 17k preshot -> BF kill
Brug on the same Chief shortly after that -> BF kill
Brug: RP: #44, Bullets: #13
Chief: RP: #242, Bullets: #231
Move along folks, nothing to see here!
Thanks for the publicity. :-) Anyways we have seen too many near impossible BFs. We have heard bulletcounts should be worth more etc. Last night for example i shot a chief with 1300 bulletpos and 1.5% onlinetime. He would have max 30k bullets or so if im not entirely mistaken. I survived with 1 health, minus 3bgs and 1 suit. While i was #44 rp and #13 bullets. If the time i(and others) invest in this game, simply doesnt matter, its no fucking point doing so anymore. I could do equal damage barely being online, just fixing lackeys from time to time.
Lets all start collecting flowers. This shooting doesnt do anyone good :''')
Faffie isn't doing the game too good aswell so ;)
Arcanine at 16:55:04 on 13/07:
Then the Chief must have messed up with his bodyguards. A decent chief who shoots 60k with attacking bodyguard wiould have killed you easily if you were full attack.
Ravenger at 16:29:01 on 13/07:
Well i'm a brug, was trained full attack, offline in not my home city, not in villa etc. Got shot by a chief with 60k bullets, survived and killed him in BF. To me, that makes brugs seem a lot stronger than chiefs when defending, but not when attacking.
Well i'm a brug, was trained full attack, offline in not my home city, not in villa etc. Got shot by a chief with 60k bullets, survived and killed him in BF. To me, that makes brugs seem a lot stronger than chiefs when defending, but not when attacking.
Then the Chief must have messed up with his bodyguards. A decent chief who shoots 60k with attacking bodyguard wiould have killed you easily if you were full attack.
well i was #2 overall..
Anonymous (17:00:22 - 13-07)
Fenrir at 13:37:21 on 13/07:
Thanks for the publicity. :-) Anyways we have seen too many near impossible BFs. We have heard bulletcounts should be worth more etc. Last night for example i shot a chief with 1300 bulletpos and 1.5% onlinetime. He would have max 30k bullets or so if im not entirely mistaken. I survived with 1 health, minus 3bgs and 1 suit. While i was #44 rp and #13 bullets. If the time i(and others) invest in this game, simply doesnt matter, its no fucking point doing so anymore. I could do equal damage barely being online, just fixing lackeys from time to time.
Lets all start collecting flowers. This shooting doesnt do anyone good :''')
Anonymous at 13:17:38 on 13/07:
Chief on Chief, shooter att trained, 17k preshot -> BF kill
Brug on the same Chief shortly after that -> BF kill
Brug: RP: #44, Bullets: #13
Chief: RP: #242, Bullets: #231
Move along folks, nothing to see here!
Chief on Chief, shooter att trained, 17k preshot -> BF kill
Brug on the same Chief shortly after that -> BF kill
Brug: RP: #44, Bullets: #13
Chief: RP: #242, Bullets: #231
Move along folks, nothing to see here!
Thanks for the publicity. :-) Anyways we have seen too many near impossible BFs. We have heard bulletcounts should be worth more etc. Last night for example i shot a chief with 1300 bulletpos and 1.5% onlinetime. He would have max 30k bullets or so if im not entirely mistaken. I survived with 1 health, minus 3bgs and 1 suit. While i was #44 rp and #13 bullets. If the time i(and others) invest in this game, simply doesnt matter, its no fucking point doing so anymore. I could do equal damage barely being online, just fixing lackeys from time to time.
Lets all start collecting flowers. This shooting doesnt do anyone good :''')
Ravenger at 16:29:01 on 13/07:
Well i'm a brug, was trained full attack, offline in not my home city, not in villa etc. Got shot by a chief with 60k bullets, survived and killed him in BF. To me, that makes brugs seem a lot stronger than chiefs when defending, but not when attacking.
Well i'm a brug, was trained full attack, offline in not my home city, not in villa etc. Got shot by a chief with 60k bullets, survived and killed him in BF. To me, that makes brugs seem a lot stronger than chiefs when defending, but not when attacking.
Then the Chief must have messed up with his bodyguards. A decent chief who shoots 60k with attacking bodyguard wiould have killed you easily if you were full attack.
shell (16:51:14 - 13-07)
Anonymous at 12:32:49 on 13/07:
in my opinion righ blooded both sides so they could play neutral and not lose numbers in the start.
Anonymous at 12:21:56 on 13/07:
Vaffa+, Grav, Gambino, Faffie, Pav, Anarchy
shell at 11:57:17 on 13/07:
Asking out of wonder. Who are righelli bloods? You speak as you know the entire list
Anonymous at 10:47:10 on 13/07:
haha ye, fucking huggers, all bloods on both sides were shooting, and they just sat there like
"oh im a pussy and my account is so important, i want to be #1 bullets but never shoot, yaya go me"
Nah, learn to play fucking arseholes.
Anonymous at 10:44:02 on 13/07:
righelli is full online during last night but they didnt go anything or help :d
pussy pussy pussy...
righelli is full online during last night but they didnt go anything or help :d
pussy pussy pussy...
haha ye, fucking huggers, all bloods on both sides were shooting, and they just sat there like
"oh im a pussy and my account is so important, i want to be #1 bullets but never shoot, yaya go me"
Nah, learn to play fucking arseholes.
Asking out of wonder. Who are righelli bloods? You speak as you know the entire list
Vaffa+, Grav, Gambino, Faffie, Pav, Anarchy
in my opinion righ blooded both sides so they could play neutral and not lose numbers in the start.
There was no vaffan this version
Out of that list, only faffie are righelli bloods and no provenza werent righelli bloods either
JTR|NotLoggedIn at 16:25:03 on 13/07:
If that's the case, then I do agree, it's a problem. People should ofc. not die every single time, they were shot at - especially not, if the shooter is way weaker. But I still think it's too early to conclude anything - these wars were mainly between chiefs and low brugs.
Arcanine at 16:17:18 on 13/07:
It all leads to the Bruglione rank being too weak from the start off. Before you have enough account strength to shoot safely you need to have atleast 400k or so more bullets than your opponent or so..that is not realistic. Apparently only backfire has been modified to be a little stronger.
But that did not solve the problem of people dying too easily..not talking about backfire kills but defending.
JTR|NotLoggedIn at 15:46:05 on 13/07:
I haven't played for a while and have just returned a bit, but I still wonder if it isn't too early to conclude something and trip all out? This is still the beginning of the version, which means that a difference of 60k bullets between two account might actually mean, that the difference in bulletsposition becomes unnaturally big, since a lot of people will have something in between - but overall then 60k isn't that big a difference in account strenght, hence the account with the high bullets position won't have that big an advantage as the numbers dictate. Same goes for all the other stats.
Maybe we should wait a bit to conclude something, untill the differences in stats actually reflect a big difference, and if the same still occurs, then it's ok to bitch - then I even agree. :-)
It was your own choice to start wars right in the beginning of the version (and it seems like it was the case in all the last versions so nothing new), so you can't bitch about the KA, before there actually is a significant difference in strength of the accounts you compare. If you had waited a few weeks before you attacked, then the outcome might have been different, but you decided to rush these wars through, hence you might have been served as deserved....
I haven't played for a while and have just returned a bit, but I still wonder if it isn't too early to conclude something and trip all out? This is still the beginning of the version, which means that a difference of 60k bullets between two account might actually mean, that the difference in bulletsposition becomes unnaturally big, since a lot of people will have something in between - but overall then 60k isn't that big a difference in account strenght, hence the account with the high bullets position won't have that big an advantage as the numbers dictate. Same goes for all the other stats.
Maybe we should wait a bit to conclude something, untill the differences in stats actually reflect a big difference, and if the same still occurs, then it's ok to bitch - then I even agree. :-)
It was your own choice to start wars right in the beginning of the version (and it seems like it was the case in all the last versions so nothing new), so you can't bitch about the KA, before there actually is a significant difference in strength of the accounts you compare. If you had waited a few weeks before you attacked, then the outcome might have been different, but you decided to rush these wars through, hence you might have been served as deserved....
It all leads to the Bruglione rank being too weak from the start off. Before you have enough account strength to shoot safely you need to have atleast 400k or so more bullets than your opponent or so..that is not realistic. Apparently only backfire has been modified to be a little stronger.
But that did not solve the problem of people dying too easily..not talking about backfire kills but defending.
If that's the case, then I do agree, it's a problem. People should ofc. not die every single time, they were shot at - especially not, if the shooter is way weaker. But I still think it's too early to conclude anything - these wars were mainly between chiefs and low brugs.
Well i'm a brug, was trained full attack, offline in not my home city, not in villa etc. Got shot by a chief with 60k bullets, survived and killed him in BF. To me, that makes brugs seem a lot stronger than chiefs when defending, but not when attacking.
JTR|NotLoggedIn (16:25:03 - 13-07)
Arcanine at 16:17:18 on 13/07:
It all leads to the Bruglione rank being too weak from the start off. Before you have enough account strength to shoot safely you need to have atleast 400k or so more bullets than your opponent or so..that is not realistic. Apparently only backfire has been modified to be a little stronger.
But that did not solve the problem of people dying too easily..not talking about backfire kills but defending.
JTR|NotLoggedIn at 15:46:05 on 13/07:
I haven't played for a while and have just returned a bit, but I still wonder if it isn't too early to conclude something and trip all out? This is still the beginning of the version, which means that a difference of 60k bullets between two account might actually mean, that the difference in bulletsposition becomes unnaturally big, since a lot of people will have something in between - but overall then 60k isn't that big a difference in account strenght, hence the account with the high bullets position won't have that big an advantage as the numbers dictate. Same goes for all the other stats.
Maybe we should wait a bit to conclude something, untill the differences in stats actually reflect a big difference, and if the same still occurs, then it's ok to bitch - then I even agree. :-)
It was your own choice to start wars right in the beginning of the version (and it seems like it was the case in all the last versions so nothing new), so you can't bitch about the KA, before there actually is a significant difference in strength of the accounts you compare. If you had waited a few weeks before you attacked, then the outcome might have been different, but you decided to rush these wars through, hence you might have been served as deserved....
I haven't played for a while and have just returned a bit, but I still wonder if it isn't too early to conclude something and trip all out? This is still the beginning of the version, which means that a difference of 60k bullets between two account might actually mean, that the difference in bulletsposition becomes unnaturally big, since a lot of people will have something in between - but overall then 60k isn't that big a difference in account strenght, hence the account with the high bullets position won't have that big an advantage as the numbers dictate. Same goes for all the other stats.
Maybe we should wait a bit to conclude something, untill the differences in stats actually reflect a big difference, and if the same still occurs, then it's ok to bitch - then I even agree. :-)
It was your own choice to start wars right in the beginning of the version (and it seems like it was the case in all the last versions so nothing new), so you can't bitch about the KA, before there actually is a significant difference in strength of the accounts you compare. If you had waited a few weeks before you attacked, then the outcome might have been different, but you decided to rush these wars through, hence you might have been served as deserved....
It all leads to the Bruglione rank being too weak from the start off. Before you have enough account strength to shoot safely you need to have atleast 400k or so more bullets than your opponent or so..that is not realistic. Apparently only backfire has been modified to be a little stronger.
But that did not solve the problem of people dying too easily..not talking about backfire kills but defending.
If that's the case, then I do agree, it's a problem. People should ofc. not die every single time, they were shot at - especially not, if the shooter is way weaker. But I still think it's too early to conclude anything - these wars were mainly between chiefs and low brugs.
JTR|NotLoggedIn at 15:46:05 on 13/07:
I haven't played for a while and have just returned a bit, but I still wonder if it isn't too early to conclude something and trip all out? This is still the beginning of the version, which means that a difference of 60k bullets between two account might actually mean, that the difference in bulletsposition becomes unnaturally big, since a lot of people will have something in between - but overall then 60k isn't that big a difference in account strenght, hence the account with the high bullets position won't have that big an advantage as the numbers dictate. Same goes for all the other stats.
Maybe we should wait a bit to conclude something, untill the differences in stats actually reflect a big difference, and if the same still occurs, then it's ok to bitch - then I even agree. :-)
It was your own choice to start wars right in the beginning of the version (and it seems like it was the case in all the last versions so nothing new), so you can't bitch about the KA, before there actually is a significant difference in strength of the accounts you compare. If you had waited a few weeks before you attacked, then the outcome might have been different, but you decided to rush these wars through, hence you might have been served as deserved....
I haven't played for a while and have just returned a bit, but I still wonder if it isn't too early to conclude something and trip all out? This is still the beginning of the version, which means that a difference of 60k bullets between two account might actually mean, that the difference in bulletsposition becomes unnaturally big, since a lot of people will have something in between - but overall then 60k isn't that big a difference in account strenght, hence the account with the high bullets position won't have that big an advantage as the numbers dictate. Same goes for all the other stats.
Maybe we should wait a bit to conclude something, untill the differences in stats actually reflect a big difference, and if the same still occurs, then it's ok to bitch - then I even agree. :-)
It was your own choice to start wars right in the beginning of the version (and it seems like it was the case in all the last versions so nothing new), so you can't bitch about the KA, before there actually is a significant difference in strength of the accounts you compare. If you had waited a few weeks before you attacked, then the outcome might have been different, but you decided to rush these wars through, hence you might have been served as deserved....
It all leads to the Bruglione rank being too weak from the start off. Before you have enough account strength to shoot safely you need to have atleast 400k or so more bullets than your opponent or so..that is not realistic. Apparently only backfire has been modified to be a little stronger.
But that did not solve the problem of people dying too easily..not talking about backfire kills but defending.
JTR|NotLoggedIn (15:46:05 - 13-07)
Arcanine at 12:46:37 on 13/07:
Exactly as I predicted.
People ask for a less-attacking friendly KA..what does crew do..? 'slightly' tweak backfire and make it overpowered. What we really asked for is stronger accounts that survive 60k, not necessarily much stronger backfire.
There is NO way anymore to properly defend your account. Items get destroyed and have awfully long timers on them so you cant rebuy, if you somehow manage to survive an attempt.
I asked Kcode about this and he thought it's fair that 90% of the attempts are successfull because people shoot 60k..he expects us to do more pre-shoots. Pre-shoots that are impossible with double backfire settings still existing.
They felll into the trap, lets see if they are willing to listen to experienced players.
This is a suicide KA where a Brug account is just as much worth as an Assassin.
Exactly as I predicted.
People ask for a less-attacking friendly KA..what does crew do..? 'slightly' tweak backfire and make it overpowered. What we really asked for is stronger accounts that survive 60k, not necessarily much stronger backfire.
There is NO way anymore to properly defend your account. Items get destroyed and have awfully long timers on them so you cant rebuy, if you somehow manage to survive an attempt.
I asked Kcode about this and he thought it's fair that 90% of the attempts are successfull because people shoot 60k..he expects us to do more pre-shoots. Pre-shoots that are impossible with double backfire settings still existing.
They felll into the trap, lets see if they are willing to listen to experienced players.
This is a suicide KA where a Brug account is just as much worth as an Assassin.
I haven't played for a while and have just returned a bit, but I still wonder if it isn't too early to conclude something and trip all out? This is still the beginning of the version, which means that a difference of 60k bullets between two account might actually mean, that the difference in bulletsposition becomes unnaturally big, since a lot of people will have something in between - but overall then 60k isn't that big a difference in account strenght, hence the account with the high bullets position won't have that big an advantage as the numbers dictate. Same goes for all the other stats.
Maybe we should wait a bit to conclude something, untill the differences in stats actually reflect a big difference, and if the same still occurs, then it's ok to bitch - then I even agree. :-)
It was your own choice to start wars right in the beginning of the version (and it seems like it was the case in all the last versions so nothing new), so you can't bitch about the KA, before there actually is a significant difference in strength of the accounts you compare. If you had waited a few weeks before you attacked, then the outcome might have been different, but you decided to rush these wars through, hence you might have been served as deserved....
there be a storm brewing tonight...all those in Balti get to a safehouse
What is safehouse? ;D
And who the fuck are you, the weatherman?
People should stop making faggy suggestions & conclusions overhere while they know nothing about bloodrelations this version, or what is in the minds of fams like Righelli etc..
Fuck u all and get something called a life <3