Aye, we have no scripters nor sharers. Take a good look before asking stuff like that :')
So what happens if all low ontime people killed eachother? Who will be left to kill the ones with 90% ontime?

bugged again. famlimit is 48 lol

you can maybe add for the ka a variable that is kind of random and either buffs the attack or the defense, depending on timing. The more you get attacked in a set span the more your defense lose, the same goes for the other way round offense wise. Fullstrenght in first shot and with every other you lose a bit of power. That resets than every 6/12/? hrs.

Ontime means really nothing...just that he has a omerta tab open.
Furthermore if you really wanna do the restrictions based on ontimes you have to do it both ways...1% can't shoot 40% and 40% can't shoot 1% ;-). Which would make it dumb, because the fams have to consist of people with high ontime and lowontime.


I would really like something like a diplomacy thing.
You can make binding non-shooting aggreements and ig you can't shoot the fams you aggreed with for the set time. Same with tribute payments and declaring wars. Any fam can join declared wars on either side and can only attack the enemy side until the war is over...fams down or non-shoot aggreement between the initiators. That would make the whole fam situation abit less complicated in wars. Backstabbing is still possible outside non-shoot aggreements.

I'll be waiting to give you all lot's of damage :')

Putting restrictions on shooting for percentage of online time would be terrible move. It can be abused on so many different ways, and it's pretty obvious why is it so easy to abuse. Same as putting restriction on how much bullets you can shoot each rank.

Any account in this game should be able to die from other ones, especially before they reach highest rank. That's how game was for years, and there's no point changing that. If you died by a suicider as LC or Chief you aren't either 1st or last one that had suicides happen to you.

There are more dynamic ways to make shooting, killing and surviving more interesting and rewarding, but devs need to think further from just keeping old pattern. Imo one of most boring things in this game is double backfire, that thing right there makes game stale. Changing KA's in versions or favoring attackers is just fixing existing problem. Best counter play for double bf is that you hope KA is attacker friendly, shoot 60k and check what's ur luck that day. They should make backfire stronger, but remove double backfire from game imo. There could be options on backfire to make people feel more safe, but double backfire is imo toxic for game play.

Building your account for your plans, so you can't go full offensive and defensive at same time (not just bodyguards), would be nice move in direction of making things more interesting. I still think Rob/Mia, C4 and panic room were moves in right direction but they were given up way too easy and without further exploring what can be done in making accounts more different one from another without just having rp and bullets different on them. There should be way for counter plays from one player to another, that would open so many chances of different game plays, different war planning and different outcomes.
Killing and surviving could be more dynamic with more things brought into the game, making cities and other in game factors more important in whole process.

Whole game needs big overhaul, and if it's done right it could lure new players same as old ones back to it. I think whole spot system is refreshing and even if I don't know much about it, it does seem well thought change.

So when people's accounts get killed now, Kcode is gonna get 3737364537+ pms from people crying, and how they get an ideas for Ks/Ka? I wouldn't be around either just to listen to people crying and complaining. Stop crying Stanto. Rerank and get revenge with a 1% account of your own :)

@kohfi

Tell me this ? Your top ranker dosnt use script ? Or at least 2 people on one account playing in shifts ? So dont try to avoid script ?
And second one , my acc have 13% online time so i am not talking about me, i am talking about those kills which happen yesterday .

I lol'd.
More rankscript and less lackeys for a higher ontime. Also, someone can't be killed just because he is online a lot?

Both of your ideas are ridiculous. How in any way would this be fair for players that aren't online as much as you?

@for those anonymous

30% online time is normal for people who like and play this game on a old way , who like to chat on irc spent time on it and on clicking , busting or anything else in game , some people planing there stuff because of ranking , canceling there dates , taking vacation from works , same as you with lackey dont wanna live and play like them , and that is ok , that is your way of playing , and nobody cant take away from you how you will play , but there need to know that people who play like you can kill people who play like you , its need to be different between who spent time on this game and who not . So you using a lot of lackey , go kill somebody who use it too , wanna kill someone who is active , go start be more active and you will be able to that . That is all . Scripters or dupes account for me its a same .

@zeveroareDoesnotsignin
i dont know what you need to told me that i am idiot , but ok , if it is only way to say something here ok .

@kapow
Dont know what you mean , but you know that they are testing something with that account .

Cant wait for the raids, Gambino here we come:)

Percentage online: 99.34%
Days online: 1D 17H 34M

This should pretty much be unkillable ?

Yeah people with an ontime of 40% are all dupes, they should be akilled.
My acc with 1% is at least genuine lackeys, that's how you roll.

Idiot.

Lol, so it's ok to you that you get killed by the ones who use a script and have an online time of 30%? Don't suggest things you don't have a clue about!

Ontime doesnt say much about account strength. The problem is, atleast before this version, that any brug with 1% ontime and 60k bullets could kill any other active bruglione. They said they tweaked it so lets hope it works out.

For the lowranks I don't see a good solution to be honest.

Also I hope they will come up with more market items so people have more things to purchase, so active players with money have a bigger advantage.

Currently you can buy the entire market for like 10 million..too easy.

Totally agree with you about stay low behind the radar , dont be greedy , but just still thinking that is really fucked that acc with 1% ontime kill any acc over 30% . And that what i try to explain , not about taking spots and objects .

No. I am a great player with around 5-10% online time. With 1 account.

They said they changed the KA to be less attack-favoured so lets see how it turns out. If it didnt change enough we will be resetting in 1 month again.

Prolly you are one of the those 2 groups , 1% online or one man army who play with lot of dupes , and stay behind until first big war started and then put in your little dupe fam ppl who rerank ? Do am i wrong ?

LOL. Just stop.

Especially your first suggestion is absolutely crazy.

I do agree that it's a bit unfair that you can be killed by anyone as long as you arent brug but thats the risk you are taking when you want to buy the best spots.

Just stay low until you are Brug.

!KCode

There is no chance to found you on IRC for some nice suggestion.

1. Its really sad when player with 1% online time kill one of the best rankers and any other player who have 20 30 40 50% online time . Player with so little online time is 99% dupe but you cant check and catch him if they use teamviewer . So where is justice for players who play this game , live by the game die by the game ?? So if i lose my eyes on typing code to be faster and online as much as i can , i dont wanna die from account who is 1% online .
So , what about to put easy option , IF ELSE(programing code you know what i am talking about) that account with 1-5% online time cant shoot account over 20% , account 1-10% online time cant shoot account over 40% and account with 1-15% online time cant shoot account over 50% online time . So lackey account still have it chance to shoot lackey account but not player who die on keyboard and lose his eyes on codes . This is justice for everyone and that is one way to stop one man army with dupes .

2. You change whole economy in game , bring us more money , easy money , more bullets and faster ranking , right ? So its very easy to have a pretty nice amount of bullets on Assasin Local Chief . So why you dont put some max limit on bullet shoot per rank ? Now you get situation same if Bruglion can shoot 120k for secure suiciding ? And Bruglione have limit on 60k , so put limit example ...swindler can shoot max 14k , assasin max 20k , LC max 40k(if sure that he can suriviev shoot of 40k) Chief max 60k .

Second suggestion is hard to setup , maybe not , but first suggestion you can setup in 1 hour , and you will bring justice to player who play this game .

Liberta didnt start this version. Some of their members started Vaevictis, some started Invertebrate and some will start a new family. None will blood Liberta's bloods. Exact info ;D