Why are you attacking me personally? Frustrated much? Have you seen who wrote this article. My only comment I made in this topic was actually Pro-Messina.

Different KA :) Rob saved my ass twice.

It's funny how you are trying to drag other people down with you.

You can think whatever you want about my Pepino account, but it was legit. I've always been legit.

It's rather easily proven if that's bug abuse or legit. If you know the exact time all those peeps were hitlisted, and then crossreference it with the OBN DB (or logs from #Beyond.info from that time). If the amount of money reduced from the game isn't nearly as much as all the hitlistings combined = abuse.

He means that you were hitlisted in this fashion. Sbanks' English is horrible. :(

You know damn well what I mean with Personal. Unless your English comprehesion is even worse than I expected.

Sadly for you, I don't have facebook, sorry pal.

This site became IM? Or Facebook? O_O

We have a message service nowadays, so we don't have to read the personal bullshit. ;D

Hardcore/style reference? (like the "Back to the oldschool" on the fampage)

Cat and mouse. They are playing with their prey, then they will smoke a joint with you, while stabbing you with a knife.

Live footage of this "epic" dance battle:


You saw it here on OBN-Live!

Register an account and be logged in automatically, problem solved.

We always delete those comments (sometimes we just don't notice them and they slip on by) and nowadays people get banned for 24/48/72 hours or even forever if they make comments like that.

V` when you are discussing something with someone do you have to insult or belittle the other person in the discussion in every single post? At least keep it civilised.

There's always people bitching, so just ignore them.
When we don't report the small things: "Why don't you report everything?". If we report everything: "Is this even worth a news post?". If we make newsposts storytelling: "We just wanna see the warfacts". If we make them factwise: "why are the news reports so boring".

People just try to seem bad ass by being negative about everything. Being against everything makes you rebellious right?! Not to mention how cool your friends will think you are.

I think homework was done good enough by certain people.
But then comes the part where you have to please all the different people/sides/families that you have to get in to actually make the war against this group of fams work, and then it always fucks up, as, unlike with your side, these people all have different ideas/views on how to proceed, who to target, what to do and how to do it. And if not enough of their points are met? Tears will be shed.
Maybe you never had to deal with that as you have a large playerbase between you and your bloods, big enough to counter any opposing side that might arise. Unlike most other families. If you haven't experienced that you are a lucky man indeed.

And not everyone was shot all at once. Just read the war report and you'll see how the war was planned.

Next to that, I think the defender side caught a very lucky break in this war. With the timing of the leak. So don't try to bust the balls of people that planned this war. Instead of trying to make a smart remark about homework needing to be done better.

Hmm, I doubt that that's entirely true tbh, best example for that is the Carneglia war in 3.2, even though it was anticipated to become a shitstorm.

Only Carneglia was targeted back then (and taken down swiftly), yet it still became (one of) the most chaotic wars of the version.

If you target and kill 1 of the core families you'd better be prepared for a shitstorm too. As that shit will get much more messy than what you make it seem like now.

Again that's something you read a shitload.
I doubt it would be any different if you, say, target just Lucchese. Because if you target Lucchese, you'll have to consider a counter of 6 families; Gravano Messina, Memento, Catania, Marazzino and of course Righelli. With this KA, you can't let those families have free counters on you, now can you? So you'll have to have back up for families. Then your back ups (what is exactly the same as what happened now..) will shoot against those bloods, and those bloods' bloods will jump in (exactly the same as what happened now).

And conclusion: War will look exactly the same as now.

Nothing would happen? Just Look at the versions without the "old families" (kinda schmuck way of announcing yourself). I've already asked if Sbanks could implement something like that, a "wardensity meter" at the OBN Awards at the part of the version statistics. The war density of versions without the "old families" is higher.


That's a a false argument. Especially big wars are much more frequent when that side dies. I've looked it up out of curiousity before as this is an argument you people always like to make.

You forget to understand that most families that worked together even yesterday do not like each other at all, same goes for why Turkuz and Pentagram had to die first before people did anything. "Let them show what they can, the fuckers will have to plan this version I'm not gonna hand them a victory blablablablabla" and thus the other families lost about 150 brugs that could have been shooting against the "old families". It's not because they are slow in planning (look at this plan, which was created within 24 hours, and if it wouldn't have leaked with luck 2 hours before the war it would have been a whole different story).

Maybe you are less active when your family dies and thus notice less of what happens in omerta in the version when the "old families" die? But the intrigues, selling etc, it's actually quite the maffia style, unlike when your side wins, then it's 1 big war at the start nowadays and then just picking off the last couple of fams since 3.3. Well woopti-fucking-doo, I wouldn't call that exciting at all.

And then 5 fams jump in on you who have that attacker advantage. I think you are making it seem slightly too easy what planning a war really requires in this current environment. Or maybe that's purely because of your perspective. :)

Sure if you have a 3 or 4:1 ratio with 5 fam vs 1 fam and no potential jumpers, it's as easy as you say. But that fortune isn't given to everyone.

The guy who's usually the biggest failer in Desti/DIG; Olmert. It really surprised me. :')

No there were more, but not many. Miesha for example got killed in BF while not even making the kill.