Johnny just give up these guys keep comparing it to old days bloodlists but keep forgetting there were huge number of families in the game that had good numbers of brugliones, so the game could actually take if you had 5/6 families in your bloodship that were in top 10, now if you have 5/6 or even more families out of top 10 as your blood you dominate easily and that is what people fail to see as the big differ from the 2.x versions and how the game is nowdays

the guy you are trying to explain prolly didnt even play back then :p
he just heard around

you're so low

Is that you saros?

I don't suffer from amnesia and I do remember how things here went in the past.

I don't get where does myth of Vinci starting massblooding come from?
You talk about 2,1 when Vinci started, or 2,3 to 2,4 where everyone played in alliance where idd Affinitas was huge? Or you talk about 2,8 where Vinci had 6-7 bloods which was normal for those times?
Or you talk about 2,9 where we had overall 8 bloods, (where never all of them were up at the same time) in version where Vinci was up twice. Now don't forget that during times Omerta was still at it's peak and it had around 10k active players at least.
Or you talk about 3,0 where we had one war against 20+ families? Even in that version we didn't have more than 6 bloods, 7 at the very end cause we blooded Dead Rabbits when version was already decided (Kerberos, Vaffanculo, Gravano, Gambino, Talamasca and later Leviticus and after that we added DIG because Talamasca joined them, Dead Rabbits and Liberta) in version that lasted almost a year. That's 8 families in a year long version. In version that probably had over 100 families up. And for the record we started with 5 bloods, which in that that time was pretty normal number.
Or you talk about 3,1 where we had 4 bloods? Vaffanculo, Gravano, Talamasca, Civella.
Or you talk about 3,2 where again we had 5 bloods on start adding 1 more later on? Conflict, Vaffanculo, Gravano, Liberta, Talamasca and we blooded Presidential after 1st war.
Or we are talking about 3,3 where we had 5 bloods again. Conflict, Marangello, Gravano, Liberta and Venture? Where we ended up killing Venture cause we found out they were making plan to kill us with our bloods.
I didn't play 3,4 but I don't think it went much different.

Most of you talking about pacts here have no clue where that word came from. First group people here called pact was Conflict - Curse - Righelli - Illusion (with some more fams). Those fams were literally making us all look like clowns trying to fight them and fail, that people started calling them pact cause everyone felt powerless in attempts to kill them. That lasted from 2.7 to 2.8a (4 versions, thought they didn't win 2.8).

It's amazing how people here suffer from amnesia and how events actually went. We as Vinci played our own role in pacts, and yes we did use that play style cause it is so effective, but please do not give bullshit here how we started it and this is just reaction to it. Vincitori prior to this version didn't play for 3 years, and you still say families play that way cause Vincitori forced everyone to play that way? Please stop lying to yourself or others. And besides look at versions where Vincitori wasn't shot out of pure fear or hate (2,9), we actually played quite different than most of you remember and talk here.

i bet they will join the attackers side;) ahumhum

Krays Hired. Confirmed.

I remember whem Aeterna shown up in the game. They rly didn't needed much pact because of their size.
Anyway, if you start to talk about the past there isn't hardly any winner/big fam that didnt made agreements to win. I remember aeterna did with faffie whem i was there.
Point is, nowadays If you got bloods you are trying to make a pact (how many rly? or depends on size? or on fams up? or depends if some fams are in it like Sib or Anarchy)
If you have few bloods or no bloods you are a noob and a easy pick, go fuck yourself you dont know how to play
So can someone explain me how is the proper way to play this shit? Its not worth to say "dont play"; "retire"; "to win" or "stupid noob fuck". TY

sounds to me you're the one being butthurt my friend :')

masspacting is always wrong! I haven't seen siberia masspact since I've been with them for the last couple of versions, though butthurt hatorz always like to cry much. Tears be heavy on you.

where is your ratio's dude :) maybe you can convince some people with that masspacting is so wroooong unless siberia does it :D

I know right? Some things never change.

u are speaking just like a noob :D

Go to bed I will, but the latter, never!

go to bed noob and lick saros' ass :D

much brave much stronk

Weren't accepted in wich pact? I think you don't know what you're talking about lol

Aeterna is the bravest fam of all omerta.

some will tell that aeterna-lusa fought bravely against the pact, the ones who wrote that staff for vinci :) But let me tell first before you right that kind of thing. Vinci was one of the first fams to start massblood. If they had time after anarchy vs siberia, they would have done so. And as for Aeterna, they tried to blood all fams on omerta and if you are aware they were always in the winning pacts, and this version they tried to do so but they weren't accepted to the pact. So please don't right such things like aeterna is the bravest fam of all omerta.