» Menu
» OB/Site News
» Articles
 |
» Barafranca News
No news found. Reset in progress?
 |
|
article
Anarchy, Comissio, Peakys and Gambino have taken up arms against Lusa and Prophecy.
Almost 2 hours later, Decavalcanti opens fire against Colossal. Persico joins against Colossal later on.
Aeterna and Casappa have launched a counter against Comissio, but Anarchy was ready and is shooting back at them, getting help from Peakys and Psychonymous.
4 hours in and we have another counter starting: Albireo is targeting Decavalcanti.
On the second evening, a number of families start a new attack against Peakys. The shooters appear to be Sangreal, Enfoire and Nazdrovia.
Shortly after this attack started, a second group of families - Squadron, Avengers and Shield - opened fire against Anarchy.
Anarchy's bloods decided to assist them, with Albireo launching a counter against Squadron, Comissio and Persico against Avengers, and Psychonymous against Shield.
Albireo later stopped their counter, but Notte and Vetta decided to take up arms for Anarchy as well, targeting Squadron.
Anarchy Comissio Peakys Gambino Rinnovo → Lusa
Anarchy Comissio Gambino Rinnovo → Prophecy
Decavalcanti Persico → Colossal
Aeterna Casappa → Comissio
Anarchy Peakys Rinnovo → Aeterna Casappa
Psychonymous → Aeterna
Albireo → Decavalcanti
Second day:
Sangreal Enfoire Nazdrovia → Peakys
Squadron Avengers Shield → Anarchy
Albireo → Squadron
Comissio Persico → Avengers
Psychonymous → Shield
Almost 2 hours later, Decavalcanti opens fire against Colossal. Persico joins against Colossal later on.
Aeterna and Casappa have launched a counter against Comissio, but Anarchy was ready and is shooting back at them, getting help from Peakys and Psychonymous.
4 hours in and we have another counter starting: Albireo is targeting Decavalcanti.
On the second evening, a number of families start a new attack against Peakys. The shooters appear to be Sangreal, Enfoire and Nazdrovia.
Shortly after this attack started, a second group of families - Squadron, Avengers and Shield - opened fire against Anarchy.
Anarchy's bloods decided to assist them, with Albireo launching a counter against Squadron, Comissio and Persico against Avengers, and Psychonymous against Shield.
Albireo later stopped their counter, but Notte and Vetta decided to take up arms for Anarchy as well, targeting Squadron.
Anarchy Comissio Peakys Gambino Rinnovo → Lusa
Anarchy Comissio Gambino Rinnovo → Prophecy
Decavalcanti Persico → Colossal
Aeterna Casappa → Comissio
Anarchy Peakys Rinnovo → Aeterna Casappa
Psychonymous → Aeterna
Albireo → Decavalcanti
Second day:
Sangreal Enfoire Nazdrovia → Peakys
Squadron Avengers Shield → Anarchy
Albireo → Squadron
Comissio Persico → Avengers
Psychonymous → Shield
statistics
| War started on: 17:57:03 10-09-2015 | War ended on: 12:48:04 15-09-2015 |
| Bullet difference: -35,028,068 | War duration: 4d 18h 51m |
| Money difference: -$965,793,586 | Players died: 594 |
deaths
Dead Families:
Deaths per family:
|
|
0
I hope all the trashfams who decided to get involved in a war with less than 1:1 ratio to assist a family with 10+ bloods covering more than 60% of all highranks (probably more, after last night's war) feel good about themselves.
This is truly the most laughable version I have ever seen. I would not be surprised if this was the final nail in the coffin. Just going by the number of tops from competent fams who have decided to retire after this version, it's gonna be a huge gap and I don't see anyone being there to fill it.
This is truly the most laughable version I have ever seen. I would not be surprised if this was the final nail in the coffin. Just going by the number of tops from competent fams who have decided to retire after this version, it's gonna be a huge gap and I don't see anyone being there to fill it.
Anonymous (22:55:17 - 11-09)
Anonymous at 22:53:31 on 11/09:
Squad Avengers ---> anarchy
sang enfoire ---> peakys
missing fams im sure
Anonymous at 22:49:59 on 11/09:
i think murderinc is analyzing and writing xD
Anonymous at 22:45:09 on 11/09:
Where are the reporters
Where are the reporters
Squad Avengers ---> anarchy
sang enfoire ---> peakys
missing fams im sure
comissio persico --> avengers
Anonymous (22:53:31 - 11-09)
Anonymous at 22:49:59 on 11/09:
i think murderinc is analyzing and writing xD
Anonymous at 22:45:09 on 11/09:
Where are the reporters
Where are the reporters
Squad Avengers ---> anarchy
sang enfoire ---> peakys
missing fams im sure
Anonymous (22:49:59 - 11-09)
Anonymous at 22:45:09 on 11/09:
Where are the reporters
Where are the reporters
Anonymous (22:45:09 - 11-09)
Where are the reporters
Anonymous (22:42:42 - 11-09)
Zina at 22:39:39 on 11/09:
Aahw anon pussy you don't have to make me famous, I'm famous since 2.0 :w
Anonymous at 19:11:52 on 11/09:
everyone shut up and just blame ZinA
why?just for fun :D
ps : dont be affraid to pm her with things to blame her for =P
everyone shut up and just blame ZinA
why?just for fun :D
ps : dont be affraid to pm her with things to blame her for =P
Anonymous at 19:11:52 on 11/09:
everyone shut up and just blame ZinA
why?just for fun :D
ps : dont be affraid to pm her with things to blame her for =P
everyone shut up and just blame ZinA
why?just for fun :D
ps : dont be affraid to pm her with things to blame her for =P
Anonymous (22:24:19 - 11-09)
darklazy at 18:20:48 on 11/09:
Hey friend! You exactly right but missing one point. We have done this before for years. Nobody called us as heroes but made fun out of it. We have members and thanks to them being with us for years and never give up from us. ( You call them as dupes but it was great to see 70 ppl in war chan yesterday).
If u lose and lose and lose all the time because of your principles what u ll earn.. Just completely nothing. Have been in both sides so i can tell u this being loser is more fun with that style. But ppl seek for success. I again say we didnt invented to play pact games. Actually we still do not. We have some loyal fams around. Thats it. Never sold anyone who did not betrey us in a way. But we always did what we want to do instead of listening others. This version it went like this. Last version even vizzini version we tried to let others play but we saw when anarchy purga or whatever u call it follow the way you mentioned... Nobody cares and shoot us with many fams. Avoiding is not has to be problem for others. They had same possibilities as well. But they couldnt use it but we all know they tried it. It could be opposite of it but not this time.
Anonymous at 18:03:27 on 11/09:
Hey dark. Listen up. You blame families from earlier versions for starting to pact, starting to play like pacting and so on. Fine, lets accept that, they started. Then I would be the hero of Anarchy to make a statement this version, a statement like: "Let's show them that we can play this version in a nice way, maybe make a good chance to win this version. That all, with just a minimum amount of bloods, let's say about 2-3 bloods."
If you would've done that, you could've been pointing a finger to the earlier pacters and pacts made in the past and teach them how to play without pacting. You did exactly the opposite. You started to massblood like no one ever did before. And then crying so pathetic that it's not your fault, because others did pact before you did. Get your shit together. You could've won this version with only 2-3 bloods, Anarchy was big enough for that.
You could've been the one breaking that pact-style of the previous versions. You had the size and strenght for it this version. You decided to play it lame. That others pacted before is absolutely NO excuse for you to do it even worse. Blame them, sure, but be a hero and don't do it yourself.
In fact you continue the pacting of the ones you blame of pacting. That's seriously pathetic. You could've made this version a good one. The blame is also for comissio and gambino to don't have the balls to say: We are not gonna do this, this is ruining the game.
Could've earned so much respect.. did the opposite. Lack of intelligence? Probably.
Hey dark. Listen up. You blame families from earlier versions for starting to pact, starting to play like pacting and so on. Fine, lets accept that, they started. Then I would be the hero of Anarchy to make a statement this version, a statement like: "Let's show them that we can play this version in a nice way, maybe make a good chance to win this version. That all, with just a minimum amount of bloods, let's say about 2-3 bloods."
If you would've done that, you could've been pointing a finger to the earlier pacters and pacts made in the past and teach them how to play without pacting. You did exactly the opposite. You started to massblood like no one ever did before. And then crying so pathetic that it's not your fault, because others did pact before you did. Get your shit together. You could've won this version with only 2-3 bloods, Anarchy was big enough for that.
You could've been the one breaking that pact-style of the previous versions. You had the size and strenght for it this version. You decided to play it lame. That others pacted before is absolutely NO excuse for you to do it even worse. Blame them, sure, but be a hero and don't do it yourself.
In fact you continue the pacting of the ones you blame of pacting. That's seriously pathetic. You could've made this version a good one. The blame is also for comissio and gambino to don't have the balls to say: We are not gonna do this, this is ruining the game.
Could've earned so much respect.. did the opposite. Lack of intelligence? Probably.
Hey friend! You exactly right but missing one point. We have done this before for years. Nobody called us as heroes but made fun out of it. We have members and thanks to them being with us for years and never give up from us. ( You call them as dupes but it was great to see 70 ppl in war chan yesterday).
If u lose and lose and lose all the time because of your principles what u ll earn.. Just completely nothing. Have been in both sides so i can tell u this being loser is more fun with that style. But ppl seek for success. I again say we didnt invented to play pact games. Actually we still do not. We have some loyal fams around. Thats it. Never sold anyone who did not betrey us in a way. But we always did what we want to do instead of listening others. This version it went like this. Last version even vizzini version we tried to let others play but we saw when anarchy purga or whatever u call it follow the way you mentioned... Nobody cares and shoot us with many fams. Avoiding is not has to be problem for others. They had same possibilities as well. But they couldnt use it but we all know they tried it. It could be opposite of it but not this time.
I haven't seen Anarchy in this size and this strength that often. The only version I do remember you were huge as Anarchy, was recently, about 2-3 versions ago. That version you won. I can be wrong or forget a bit, but I haven't played everything. It is not about that you didn't try. That is what I really respect, from which fam that tries. But if there was one version you as Anarchy could show it, it was this version. This version Anarchy had the size + strength to prove that you can play without this insane massblooding. I mean, we all know that families nowadays have several bloods.
If I were in your position, I wouldn't agree on playing like this, I would be ashamed to play like this. Ashamed to other families but also to my own members. I would limit my bloods instead. You are #1, that is always a targetposition, no matter what. You got provided with a huge memberbase from the start of the version. There is seriously nothing good about a #1 family with such size who's blooding like this. There is none tactics involved, there is no fun involved, there is not a single spark of goodwill for the game in this way of playing.
Explain me how the defenders of this war should've moved to make chance. Exactly, there was no chance. No chance to force a break within the pact. Ofcourse, you got assisted by all those 'always being used' families like Decalvacante, Psychonymous, Agnitio and I probably forget about some. Why let them help you.. You needed their help? You couldn't win without them? Dude, wake up. Even if Aet/Lusa/Proph++ managed to get some of those use families on their side, it never would've changed the outcome. Your pact was so big that there was 0,0 chance to get something.
Ok, we can also put the blame on those use-families, but they've been sleeping for ages now, that will never change. So why bother to ask them shooting, you know they will. What made u scared? The massive counter from Aet/Lusa/Prop side which never would be there because well, you had everything. Understand my point. This way of playing doesn't make sense in this kinda versions we are now. It shows a lack of planning and tactics, plus it shows that you are scared. Scared to make enemies. You rather blood every little tiny friend, so you won't 'break' something. Sorry, but there are more then enough ways to not break friendships. Believe me, that is possible without blooding them. Just be smart and use tactics. But this version shows that you still don't have those intelligence to fix this stuff.
Aet/Lusa/Proph side saw this coming as soon as the families were up and running. There has been talking around and very soon it was clear that we had not even a tiny spark of a chance to get a success out of this. And that side always have some clever tops around, they just couldn't find a way, because there was no way of getting success against that massive pact. There has been a lot of puzzling, talking and discussing but it was just impossible. Sorry, but imagine what that does to the members of those families. I know that a lot of people hate losing. I don't like losing either. I can accept losing if it happens in a normal way, when I can do everything I could. Members aren't crazy either, they also see that we are in a position which is hopeless. Nice mental boost to start a war. The blame is on this pact which is seriously a disgrace. Several tops of those families are walking around here at omerta world for a while, experienced enough.. you should think. Then this tacticless and lame way of playing appears and the most worse thing of it all is that you don't even see what you are doing.
Gambino/Comissio/Anarchy, seriously, wake up.
Anonymous (22:05:49 - 11-09)
Enfoire in also.
Anonymous at 21:28:33 on 11/09:
Marazzino must start again?
Marazzino must start again?
No ty. Siberia should tho ;s
Anonymous (21:28:33 - 11-09)
Marazzino must start again?
Anonymous (19:11:52 - 11-09)
everyone shut up and just blame ZinA
why?just for fun :D
ps : dont be affraid to pm her with things to blame her for =P
why?just for fun :D
ps : dont be affraid to pm her with things to blame her for =P
Cracka (19:03:44 - 11-09)
Anonymous at 18:03:27 on 11/09:
Hey dark. Listen up. You blame families from earlier versions for starting to pact, starting to play like pacting and so on. Fine, lets accept that, they started. Then I would be the hero of Anarchy to make a statement this version, a statement like: "Let's show them that we can play this version in a nice way, maybe make a good chance to win this version. That all, with just a minimum amount of bloods, let's say about 2-3 bloods."
If you would've done that, you could've been pointing a finger to the earlier pacters and pacts made in the past and teach them how to play without pacting. You did exactly the opposite. You started to massblood like no one ever did before. And then crying so pathetic that it's not your fault, because others did pact before you did. Get your shit together. You could've won this version with only 2-3 bloods, Anarchy was big enough for that.
You could've been the one breaking that pact-style of the previous versions. You had the size and strenght for it this version. You decided to play it lame. That others pacted before is absolutely NO excuse for you to do it even worse. Blame them, sure, but be a hero and don't do it yourself.
In fact you continue the pacting of the ones you blame of pacting. That's seriously pathetic. You could've made this version a good one. The blame is also for comissio and gambino to don't have the balls to say: We are not gonna do this, this is ruining the game.
Could've earned so much respect.. did the opposite. Lack of intelligence? Probably.
Hey dark. Listen up. You blame families from earlier versions for starting to pact, starting to play like pacting and so on. Fine, lets accept that, they started. Then I would be the hero of Anarchy to make a statement this version, a statement like: "Let's show them that we can play this version in a nice way, maybe make a good chance to win this version. That all, with just a minimum amount of bloods, let's say about 2-3 bloods."
If you would've done that, you could've been pointing a finger to the earlier pacters and pacts made in the past and teach them how to play without pacting. You did exactly the opposite. You started to massblood like no one ever did before. And then crying so pathetic that it's not your fault, because others did pact before you did. Get your shit together. You could've won this version with only 2-3 bloods, Anarchy was big enough for that.
You could've been the one breaking that pact-style of the previous versions. You had the size and strenght for it this version. You decided to play it lame. That others pacted before is absolutely NO excuse for you to do it even worse. Blame them, sure, but be a hero and don't do it yourself.
In fact you continue the pacting of the ones you blame of pacting. That's seriously pathetic. You could've made this version a good one. The blame is also for comissio and gambino to don't have the balls to say: We are not gonna do this, this is ruining the game.
Could've earned so much respect.. did the opposite. Lack of intelligence? Probably.
Anonymous at 18:03:27 on 11/09:
Hey dark. Listen up. You blame families from earlier versions for starting to pact, starting to play like pacting and so on. Fine, lets accept that, they started. Then I would be the hero of Anarchy to make a statement this version, a statement like: "Let's show them that we can play this version in a nice way, maybe make a good chance to win this version. That all, with just a minimum amount of bloods, let's say about 2-3 bloods."
If you would've done that, you could've been pointing a finger to the earlier pacters and pacts made in the past and teach them how to play without pacting. You did exactly the opposite. You started to massblood like no one ever did before. And then crying so pathetic that it's not your fault, because others did pact before you did. Get your shit together. You could've won this version with only 2-3 bloods, Anarchy was big enough for that.
You could've been the one breaking that pact-style of the previous versions. You had the size and strenght for it this version. You decided to play it lame. That others pacted before is absolutely NO excuse for you to do it even worse. Blame them, sure, but be a hero and don't do it yourself.
In fact you continue the pacting of the ones you blame of pacting. That's seriously pathetic. You could've made this version a good one. The blame is also for comissio and gambino to don't have the balls to say: We are not gonna do this, this is ruining the game.
Could've earned so much respect.. did the opposite. Lack of intelligence? Probably.
Hey dark. Listen up. You blame families from earlier versions for starting to pact, starting to play like pacting and so on. Fine, lets accept that, they started. Then I would be the hero of Anarchy to make a statement this version, a statement like: "Let's show them that we can play this version in a nice way, maybe make a good chance to win this version. That all, with just a minimum amount of bloods, let's say about 2-3 bloods."
If you would've done that, you could've been pointing a finger to the earlier pacters and pacts made in the past and teach them how to play without pacting. You did exactly the opposite. You started to massblood like no one ever did before. And then crying so pathetic that it's not your fault, because others did pact before you did. Get your shit together. You could've won this version with only 2-3 bloods, Anarchy was big enough for that.
You could've been the one breaking that pact-style of the previous versions. You had the size and strenght for it this version. You decided to play it lame. That others pacted before is absolutely NO excuse for you to do it even worse. Blame them, sure, but be a hero and don't do it yourself.
In fact you continue the pacting of the ones you blame of pacting. That's seriously pathetic. You could've made this version a good one. The blame is also for comissio and gambino to don't have the balls to say: We are not gonna do this, this is ruining the game.
Could've earned so much respect.. did the opposite. Lack of intelligence? Probably.
Anonymous (18:45:38 - 11-09)
SH lovers <3
Anonymous (18:32:58 - 11-09)
darklazy at 18:20:48 on 11/09:
Hey friend! You exactly right but missing one point. We have done this before for years. Nobody called us as heroes but made fun out of it. We have members and thanks to them being with us for years and never give up from us. ( You call them as dupes but it was great to see 70 ppl in war chan yesterday).
If u lose and lose and lose all the time because of your principles what u ll earn.. Just completely nothing. Have been in both sides so i can tell u this being loser is more fun with that style. But ppl seek for success. I again say we didnt invented to play pact games. Actually we still do not. We have some loyal fams around. Thats it. Never sold anyone who did not betrey us in a way. But we always did what we want to do instead of listening others. This version it went like this. Last version even vizzini version we tried to let others play but we saw when anarchy purga or whatever u call it follow the way you mentioned... Nobody cares and shoot us with many fams. Avoiding is not has to be problem for others. They had same possibilities as well. But they couldnt use it but we all know they tried it. It could be opposite of it but not this time.
Anonymous at 18:03:27 on 11/09:
Hey dark. Listen up. You blame families from earlier versions for starting to pact, starting to play like pacting and so on. Fine, lets accept that, they started. Then I would be the hero of Anarchy to make a statement this version, a statement like: "Let's show them that we can play this version in a nice way, maybe make a good chance to win this version. That all, with just a minimum amount of bloods, let's say about 2-3 bloods."
If you would've done that, you could've been pointing a finger to the earlier pacters and pacts made in the past and teach them how to play without pacting. You did exactly the opposite. You started to massblood like no one ever did before. And then crying so pathetic that it's not your fault, because others did pact before you did. Get your shit together. You could've won this version with only 2-3 bloods, Anarchy was big enough for that.
You could've been the one breaking that pact-style of the previous versions. You had the size and strenght for it this version. You decided to play it lame. That others pacted before is absolutely NO excuse for you to do it even worse. Blame them, sure, but be a hero and don't do it yourself.
In fact you continue the pacting of the ones you blame of pacting. That's seriously pathetic. You could've made this version a good one. The blame is also for comissio and gambino to don't have the balls to say: We are not gonna do this, this is ruining the game.
Could've earned so much respect.. did the opposite. Lack of intelligence? Probably.
Hey dark. Listen up. You blame families from earlier versions for starting to pact, starting to play like pacting and so on. Fine, lets accept that, they started. Then I would be the hero of Anarchy to make a statement this version, a statement like: "Let's show them that we can play this version in a nice way, maybe make a good chance to win this version. That all, with just a minimum amount of bloods, let's say about 2-3 bloods."
If you would've done that, you could've been pointing a finger to the earlier pacters and pacts made in the past and teach them how to play without pacting. You did exactly the opposite. You started to massblood like no one ever did before. And then crying so pathetic that it's not your fault, because others did pact before you did. Get your shit together. You could've won this version with only 2-3 bloods, Anarchy was big enough for that.
You could've been the one breaking that pact-style of the previous versions. You had the size and strenght for it this version. You decided to play it lame. That others pacted before is absolutely NO excuse for you to do it even worse. Blame them, sure, but be a hero and don't do it yourself.
In fact you continue the pacting of the ones you blame of pacting. That's seriously pathetic. You could've made this version a good one. The blame is also for comissio and gambino to don't have the balls to say: We are not gonna do this, this is ruining the game.
Could've earned so much respect.. did the opposite. Lack of intelligence? Probably.
Hey friend! You exactly right but missing one point. We have done this before for years. Nobody called us as heroes but made fun out of it. We have members and thanks to them being with us for years and never give up from us. ( You call them as dupes but it was great to see 70 ppl in war chan yesterday).
If u lose and lose and lose all the time because of your principles what u ll earn.. Just completely nothing. Have been in both sides so i can tell u this being loser is more fun with that style. But ppl seek for success. I again say we didnt invented to play pact games. Actually we still do not. We have some loyal fams around. Thats it. Never sold anyone who did not betrey us in a way. But we always did what we want to do instead of listening others. This version it went like this. Last version even vizzini version we tried to let others play but we saw when anarchy purga or whatever u call it follow the way you mentioned... Nobody cares and shoot us with many fams. Avoiding is not has to be problem for others. They had same possibilities as well. But they couldnt use it but we all know they tried it. It could be opposite of it but not this time.
so you are saying you will end with all your bloods? (say with 10 fams). Nice version.
darklazy (18:20:48 - 11-09)
Anonymous at 18:03:27 on 11/09:
Hey dark. Listen up. You blame families from earlier versions for starting to pact, starting to play like pacting and so on. Fine, lets accept that, they started. Then I would be the hero of Anarchy to make a statement this version, a statement like: "Let's show them that we can play this version in a nice way, maybe make a good chance to win this version. That all, with just a minimum amount of bloods, let's say about 2-3 bloods."
If you would've done that, you could've been pointing a finger to the earlier pacters and pacts made in the past and teach them how to play without pacting. You did exactly the opposite. You started to massblood like no one ever did before. And then crying so pathetic that it's not your fault, because others did pact before you did. Get your shit together. You could've won this version with only 2-3 bloods, Anarchy was big enough for that.
You could've been the one breaking that pact-style of the previous versions. You had the size and strenght for it this version. You decided to play it lame. That others pacted before is absolutely NO excuse for you to do it even worse. Blame them, sure, but be a hero and don't do it yourself.
In fact you continue the pacting of the ones you blame of pacting. That's seriously pathetic. You could've made this version a good one. The blame is also for comissio and gambino to don't have the balls to say: We are not gonna do this, this is ruining the game.
Could've earned so much respect.. did the opposite. Lack of intelligence? Probably.
Hey dark. Listen up. You blame families from earlier versions for starting to pact, starting to play like pacting and so on. Fine, lets accept that, they started. Then I would be the hero of Anarchy to make a statement this version, a statement like: "Let's show them that we can play this version in a nice way, maybe make a good chance to win this version. That all, with just a minimum amount of bloods, let's say about 2-3 bloods."
If you would've done that, you could've been pointing a finger to the earlier pacters and pacts made in the past and teach them how to play without pacting. You did exactly the opposite. You started to massblood like no one ever did before. And then crying so pathetic that it's not your fault, because others did pact before you did. Get your shit together. You could've won this version with only 2-3 bloods, Anarchy was big enough for that.
You could've been the one breaking that pact-style of the previous versions. You had the size and strenght for it this version. You decided to play it lame. That others pacted before is absolutely NO excuse for you to do it even worse. Blame them, sure, but be a hero and don't do it yourself.
In fact you continue the pacting of the ones you blame of pacting. That's seriously pathetic. You could've made this version a good one. The blame is also for comissio and gambino to don't have the balls to say: We are not gonna do this, this is ruining the game.
Could've earned so much respect.. did the opposite. Lack of intelligence? Probably.
Hey friend! You exactly right but missing one point. We have done this before for years. Nobody called us as heroes but made fun out of it. We have members and thanks to them being with us for years and never give up from us. ( You call them as dupes but it was great to see 70 ppl in war chan yesterday).
If u lose and lose and lose all the time because of your principles what u ll earn.. Just completely nothing. Have been in both sides so i can tell u this being loser is more fun with that style. But ppl seek for success. I again say we didnt invented to play pact games. Actually we still do not. We have some loyal fams around. Thats it. Never sold anyone who did not betrey us in a way. But we always did what we want to do instead of listening others. This version it went like this. Last version even vizzini version we tried to let others play but we saw when anarchy purga or whatever u call it follow the way you mentioned... Nobody cares and shoot us with many fams. Avoiding is not has to be problem for others. They had same possibilities as well. But they couldnt use it but we all know they tried it. It could be opposite of it but not this time.
Anonymous (18:03:27 - 11-09)
Hey dark. Listen up. You blame families from earlier versions for starting to pact, starting to play like pacting and so on. Fine, lets accept that, they started. Then I would be the hero of Anarchy to make a statement this version, a statement like: "Let's show them that we can play this version in a nice way, maybe make a good chance to win this version. That all, with just a minimum amount of bloods, let's say about 2-3 bloods."
If you would've done that, you could've been pointing a finger to the earlier pacters and pacts made in the past and teach them how to play without pacting. You did exactly the opposite. You started to massblood like no one ever did before. And then crying so pathetic that it's not your fault, because others did pact before you did. Get your shit together. You could've won this version with only 2-3 bloods, Anarchy was big enough for that.
You could've been the one breaking that pact-style of the previous versions. You had the size and strenght for it this version. You decided to play it lame. That others pacted before is absolutely NO excuse for you to do it even worse. Blame them, sure, but be a hero and don't do it yourself.
In fact you continue the pacting of the ones you blame of pacting. That's seriously pathetic. You could've made this version a good one. The blame is also for comissio and gambino to don't have the balls to say: We are not gonna do this, this is ruining the game.
Could've earned so much respect.. did the opposite. Lack of intelligence? Probably.
If you would've done that, you could've been pointing a finger to the earlier pacters and pacts made in the past and teach them how to play without pacting. You did exactly the opposite. You started to massblood like no one ever did before. And then crying so pathetic that it's not your fault, because others did pact before you did. Get your shit together. You could've won this version with only 2-3 bloods, Anarchy was big enough for that.
You could've been the one breaking that pact-style of the previous versions. You had the size and strenght for it this version. You decided to play it lame. That others pacted before is absolutely NO excuse for you to do it even worse. Blame them, sure, but be a hero and don't do it yourself.
In fact you continue the pacting of the ones you blame of pacting. That's seriously pathetic. You could've made this version a good one. The blame is also for comissio and gambino to don't have the balls to say: We are not gonna do this, this is ruining the game.
Could've earned so much respect.. did the opposite. Lack of intelligence? Probably.
Anononononymous (17:52:30 - 11-09)
I know Tim. at 17:04:27 on 11/09:
Tim is logged into the Internet. He sees something that offends him, but Tim isn't weak. He scrolls away and moves on with his life.
Good move, Tim.
Tim is logged into the Internet. He sees something that offends him, but Tim isn't weak. He scrolls away and moves on with his life.
Good move, Tim.
I'm Timbo, Tim's awkward retarded brother. I play outdated text broswer games and sacrifice my account for others who play the game for me. I also refer to me real life on my profile wall, because everybody cares about me on an anonymous shooting game. Don't be a Timbo.