» Menu
» OB/Site News
» Articles
 |
» Barafranca News
No news found. Reset in progress?
 |
|
article
As we congratulated Colossal in being the first fam up, over 24 hours later we now see them go down in the hands of the admins, reason is due to sharing.
statistics
| War started on: 13:40:04 01-09-2015 | War ended on: 13:48:04 01-09-2015 |
| Bullet difference: -60,875 | War duration: 8m |
| Money difference: -$82,652,489 | Players died: 5 |
deaths
Dead Families:
Deaths per family:
|
|
Anonymous (15:15:36 - 01-09)
Anonymous (15:13:50 - 01-09)
Anonymous at 15:05:10 on 01/09:
i'm not Bruce, i'm not even from colossal as i said earlier, you must enjoy the akill because another fam is involved, i do not enjoy them (even tho it is not my fam or blood).
I just see 4 people getting akilled without proof, that is wrong, this is already happening many versions, akills without proof and that has to change
Yes Gabriel was 24h ahead of eveyone and might have cheated, but admins don't show proof ever, so Gabriel probably also didn't get any proof and what about the other 3 that got akilled?
I just want the admins to show proof when they akill someone. Today it's colossal, tomorrow or next version it could be your fam,
Anonymous at 14:54:09 on 01/09:
hello bruce..
its not "use of teamviewer"..
its " using "
Anonymous at 14:42:32 on 01/09:
+1 this exactly akilling cheaters is good but not randomly, ontimes doesn't proof anything, use of teamviewer can't even be detected by an admin if they were using that at all, which doesn't have to be the case (I know several people that wake up every 3 hours to do a heist, and only bust on their own account and get 27.5+ bo's easily in 1 week) I'm very interested to see the proof the admins have instead, which we won't get sadly...
Killing cheaters is good, and admin akill the scripters also please, but show proof, otherwise it seems/and is in some cases so random.
Anonymous at 14:32:59 on 01/09:
There are more then 1 akill, gabriel had ontime of 81.70% (which is still doable if you don't work/go to school etc) But the other ontimes were:
Pancake --> 52.62%
Kriemheld --> 64.77%
Castiel --> 65.20%
Those other 3 ontimes doesn't same to be impossible to reach at all when ranking/busting hard, so what's your point?
Admins need to show proof before akilling
Anonymous at 14:28:33 on 01/09:
its impossible for an human be on the time he was .....so if that cant proof nothing...your problm
Anonymous at 14:25:58 on 01/09:
Presumption of innocence --> "Innocent until proven guilty"
The admins have no proof (they always say they have proof but they can't show you), in a trial for court you can't be convicted by a judge that says "yeah i convict you because i have proof but i can't show you the proof i'm sorry", that's not how it works.
I'm 100% against cheaters, but the fact that they rank and bust hard doesn't make them cheaters.
Admins should stop akilling people without showing proof of the cheating what is already happening for some versions.
Akill for cheaters fine, but proof they cheat fist before akiling them, not because they rank insanly hard and have a lot of bust outs.
(ps. and no i'm not from colossal)
Presumption of innocence --> "Innocent until proven guilty"
The admins have no proof (they always say they have proof but they can't show you), in a trial for court you can't be convicted by a judge that says "yeah i convict you because i have proof but i can't show you the proof i'm sorry", that's not how it works.
I'm 100% against cheaters, but the fact that they rank and bust hard doesn't make them cheaters.
Admins should stop akilling people without showing proof of the cheating what is already happening for some versions.
Akill for cheaters fine, but proof they cheat fist before akiling them, not because they rank insanly hard and have a lot of bust outs.
(ps. and no i'm not from colossal)
its impossible for an human be on the time he was .....so if that cant proof nothing...your problm
There are more then 1 akill, gabriel had ontime of 81.70% (which is still doable if you don't work/go to school etc) But the other ontimes were:
Pancake --> 52.62%
Kriemheld --> 64.77%
Castiel --> 65.20%
Those other 3 ontimes doesn't same to be impossible to reach at all when ranking/busting hard, so what's your point?
Admins need to show proof before akilling
+1 this exactly akilling cheaters is good but not randomly, ontimes doesn't proof anything, use of teamviewer can't even be detected by an admin if they were using that at all, which doesn't have to be the case (I know several people that wake up every 3 hours to do a heist, and only bust on their own account and get 27.5+ bo's easily in 1 week) I'm very interested to see the proof the admins have instead, which we won't get sadly...
Killing cheaters is good, and admin akill the scripters also please, but show proof, otherwise it seems/and is in some cases so random.
its not "use of teamviewer"..
its " using "
i'm not Bruce, i'm not even from colossal as i said earlier, you must enjoy the akill because another fam is involved, i do not enjoy them (even tho it is not my fam or blood).
I just see 4 people getting akilled without proof, that is wrong, this is already happening many versions, akills without proof and that has to change
Yes Gabriel was 24h ahead of eveyone and might have cheated, but admins don't show proof ever, so Gabriel probably also didn't get any proof and what about the other 3 that got akilled?
I just want the admins to show proof when they akill someone. Today it's colossal, tomorrow or next version it could be your fam,
It's all a big conspiracy isn't it!!!!
Pfft..
It's not even in the best interests of the admins to kill him anyways, so no one benefited from it.
If he cheated, then he'll have to prove he didn't. Simple as that. Admins moderate this game. Moderators are not obligated to provide proof of them cheating because its an internal report system.
Simply as that.
Anonymous (15:12:49 - 01-09)
Anonymous at 15:05:10 on 01/09:
i'm not Bruce, i'm not even from colossal as i said earlier, you must enjoy the akill because another fam is involved, i do not enjoy them (even tho it is not my fam or blood).
I just see 4 people getting akilled without proof, that is wrong, this is already happening many versions, akills without proof and that has to change
Yes Gabriel was 24h ahead of eveyone and might have cheated, but admins don't show proof ever, so Gabriel probably also didn't get any proof and what about the other 3 that got akilled?
I just want the admins to show proof when they akill someone. Today it's colossal, tomorrow or next version it could be your fam,
Anonymous at 14:54:09 on 01/09:
hello bruce..
its not "use of teamviewer"..
its " using "
Anonymous at 14:42:32 on 01/09:
+1 this exactly akilling cheaters is good but not randomly, ontimes doesn't proof anything, use of teamviewer can't even be detected by an admin if they were using that at all, which doesn't have to be the case (I know several people that wake up every 3 hours to do a heist, and only bust on their own account and get 27.5+ bo's easily in 1 week) I'm very interested to see the proof the admins have instead, which we won't get sadly...
Killing cheaters is good, and admin akill the scripters also please, but show proof, otherwise it seems/and is in some cases so random.
Anonymous at 14:32:59 on 01/09:
There are more then 1 akill, gabriel had ontime of 81.70% (which is still doable if you don't work/go to school etc) But the other ontimes were:
Pancake --> 52.62%
Kriemheld --> 64.77%
Castiel --> 65.20%
Those other 3 ontimes doesn't same to be impossible to reach at all when ranking/busting hard, so what's your point?
Admins need to show proof before akilling
Anonymous at 14:28:33 on 01/09:
its impossible for an human be on the time he was .....so if that cant proof nothing...your problm
Anonymous at 14:25:58 on 01/09:
Presumption of innocence --> "Innocent until proven guilty"
The admins have no proof (they always say they have proof but they can't show you), in a trial for court you can't be convicted by a judge that says "yeah i convict you because i have proof but i can't show you the proof i'm sorry", that's not how it works.
I'm 100% against cheaters, but the fact that they rank and bust hard doesn't make them cheaters.
Admins should stop akilling people without showing proof of the cheating what is already happening for some versions.
Akill for cheaters fine, but proof they cheat fist before akiling them, not because they rank insanly hard and have a lot of bust outs.
(ps. and no i'm not from colossal)
Presumption of innocence --> "Innocent until proven guilty"
The admins have no proof (they always say they have proof but they can't show you), in a trial for court you can't be convicted by a judge that says "yeah i convict you because i have proof but i can't show you the proof i'm sorry", that's not how it works.
I'm 100% against cheaters, but the fact that they rank and bust hard doesn't make them cheaters.
Admins should stop akilling people without showing proof of the cheating what is already happening for some versions.
Akill for cheaters fine, but proof they cheat fist before akiling them, not because they rank insanly hard and have a lot of bust outs.
(ps. and no i'm not from colossal)
its impossible for an human be on the time he was .....so if that cant proof nothing...your problm
There are more then 1 akill, gabriel had ontime of 81.70% (which is still doable if you don't work/go to school etc) But the other ontimes were:
Pancake --> 52.62%
Kriemheld --> 64.77%
Castiel --> 65.20%
Those other 3 ontimes doesn't same to be impossible to reach at all when ranking/busting hard, so what's your point?
Admins need to show proof before akilling
+1 this exactly akilling cheaters is good but not randomly, ontimes doesn't proof anything, use of teamviewer can't even be detected by an admin if they were using that at all, which doesn't have to be the case (I know several people that wake up every 3 hours to do a heist, and only bust on their own account and get 27.5+ bo's easily in 1 week) I'm very interested to see the proof the admins have instead, which we won't get sadly...
Killing cheaters is good, and admin akill the scripters also please, but show proof, otherwise it seems/and is in some cases so random.
its not "use of teamviewer"..
its " using "
i'm not Bruce, i'm not even from colossal as i said earlier, you must enjoy the akill because another fam is involved, i do not enjoy them (even tho it is not my fam or blood).
I just see 4 people getting akilled without proof, that is wrong, this is already happening many versions, akills without proof and that has to change
Yes Gabriel was 24h ahead of eveyone and might have cheated, but admins don't show proof ever, so Gabriel probably also didn't get any proof and what about the other 3 that got akilled?
I just want the admins to show proof when they akill someone. Today it's colossal, tomorrow or next version it could be your fam,
Im fine with the admins not showing "proof", this isn't a court of law. Plus if they showed the proof then the scripters/cheats whateva can learn and adapt their style to not get caught the same way. Look at rankscript the description of that looks pretty much setup to hide ways the admins look for cheats.
Pretty simple Stay out of the grey area and you won't get akilled (most likely).
Anonymous (15:12:46 - 01-09)
cheaters get what they get you play this version enough you know that stop complaining
Anonymous (15:05:10 - 01-09)
Anonymous at 14:54:09 on 01/09:
hello bruce..
its not "use of teamviewer"..
its " using "
Anonymous at 14:42:32 on 01/09:
+1 this exactly akilling cheaters is good but not randomly, ontimes doesn't proof anything, use of teamviewer can't even be detected by an admin if they were using that at all, which doesn't have to be the case (I know several people that wake up every 3 hours to do a heist, and only bust on their own account and get 27.5+ bo's easily in 1 week) I'm very interested to see the proof the admins have instead, which we won't get sadly...
Killing cheaters is good, and admin akill the scripters also please, but show proof, otherwise it seems/and is in some cases so random.
Anonymous at 14:32:59 on 01/09:
There are more then 1 akill, gabriel had ontime of 81.70% (which is still doable if you don't work/go to school etc) But the other ontimes were:
Pancake --> 52.62%
Kriemheld --> 64.77%
Castiel --> 65.20%
Those other 3 ontimes doesn't same to be impossible to reach at all when ranking/busting hard, so what's your point?
Admins need to show proof before akilling
Anonymous at 14:28:33 on 01/09:
its impossible for an human be on the time he was .....so if that cant proof nothing...your problm
Anonymous at 14:25:58 on 01/09:
Presumption of innocence --> "Innocent until proven guilty"
The admins have no proof (they always say they have proof but they can't show you), in a trial for court you can't be convicted by a judge that says "yeah i convict you because i have proof but i can't show you the proof i'm sorry", that's not how it works.
I'm 100% against cheaters, but the fact that they rank and bust hard doesn't make them cheaters.
Admins should stop akilling people without showing proof of the cheating what is already happening for some versions.
Akill for cheaters fine, but proof they cheat fist before akiling them, not because they rank insanly hard and have a lot of bust outs.
(ps. and no i'm not from colossal)
Presumption of innocence --> "Innocent until proven guilty"
The admins have no proof (they always say they have proof but they can't show you), in a trial for court you can't be convicted by a judge that says "yeah i convict you because i have proof but i can't show you the proof i'm sorry", that's not how it works.
I'm 100% against cheaters, but the fact that they rank and bust hard doesn't make them cheaters.
Admins should stop akilling people without showing proof of the cheating what is already happening for some versions.
Akill for cheaters fine, but proof they cheat fist before akiling them, not because they rank insanly hard and have a lot of bust outs.
(ps. and no i'm not from colossal)
its impossible for an human be on the time he was .....so if that cant proof nothing...your problm
There are more then 1 akill, gabriel had ontime of 81.70% (which is still doable if you don't work/go to school etc) But the other ontimes were:
Pancake --> 52.62%
Kriemheld --> 64.77%
Castiel --> 65.20%
Those other 3 ontimes doesn't same to be impossible to reach at all when ranking/busting hard, so what's your point?
Admins need to show proof before akilling
+1 this exactly akilling cheaters is good but not randomly, ontimes doesn't proof anything, use of teamviewer can't even be detected by an admin if they were using that at all, which doesn't have to be the case (I know several people that wake up every 3 hours to do a heist, and only bust on their own account and get 27.5+ bo's easily in 1 week) I'm very interested to see the proof the admins have instead, which we won't get sadly...
Killing cheaters is good, and admin akill the scripters also please, but show proof, otherwise it seems/and is in some cases so random.
its not "use of teamviewer"..
its " using "
i'm not Bruce, i'm not even from colossal as i said earlier, you must enjoy the akill because another fam is involved, i do not enjoy them (even tho it is not my fam or blood).
I just see 4 people getting akilled without proof, that is wrong, this is already happening many versions, akills without proof and that has to change
Yes Gabriel was 24h ahead of eveyone and might have cheated, but admins don't show proof ever, so Gabriel probably also didn't get any proof and what about the other 3 that got akilled?
I just want the admins to show proof when they akill someone. Today it's colossal, tomorrow or next version it could be your fam,
Redvendetta (15:02:20 - 01-09)
MurderInc at 14:50:04 on 01/09:
On the bright side, you finally managed to kill me.
Redvendetta at 14:48:01 on 01/09:
When one of the accounts wasn't even ours, you know there is no proof. We wouldn't share rotten food with MurderInc if he was starving to death, bleeding profusely from his groin-wound, let alone share our our accounts with him.
Anonymous at 14:42:32 on 01/09:
+1 this exactly akilling cheaters is good but not randomly, ontimes doesn't proof anything, use of teamviewer can't even be detected by an admin if they were using that at all, which doesn't have to be the case (I know several people that wake up every 3 hours to do a heist, and only bust on their own account and get 27.5+ bo's easily in 1 week) I'm very interested to see the proof the admins have instead, which we won't get sadly...
Killing cheaters is good, and admin akill the scripters also please, but show proof, otherwise it seems/and is in some cases so random.
Anonymous at 14:32:59 on 01/09:
There are more then 1 akill, gabriel had ontime of 81.70% (which is still doable if you don't work/go to school etc) But the other ontimes were:
Pancake --> 52.62%
Kriemheld --> 64.77%
Castiel --> 65.20%
Those other 3 ontimes doesn't same to be impossible to reach at all when ranking/busting hard, so what's your point?
Admins need to show proof before akilling
Anonymous at 14:28:33 on 01/09:
its impossible for an human be on the time he was .....so if that cant proof nothing...your problm
Anonymous at 14:25:58 on 01/09:
Presumption of innocence --> "Innocent until proven guilty"
The admins have no proof (they always say they have proof but they can't show you), in a trial for court you can't be convicted by a judge that says "yeah i convict you because i have proof but i can't show you the proof i'm sorry", that's not how it works.
I'm 100% against cheaters, but the fact that they rank and bust hard doesn't make them cheaters.
Admins should stop akilling people without showing proof of the cheating what is already happening for some versions.
Akill for cheaters fine, but proof they cheat fist before akiling them, not because they rank insanly hard and have a lot of bust outs.
(ps. and no i'm not from colossal)
Presumption of innocence --> "Innocent until proven guilty"
The admins have no proof (they always say they have proof but they can't show you), in a trial for court you can't be convicted by a judge that says "yeah i convict you because i have proof but i can't show you the proof i'm sorry", that's not how it works.
I'm 100% against cheaters, but the fact that they rank and bust hard doesn't make them cheaters.
Admins should stop akilling people without showing proof of the cheating what is already happening for some versions.
Akill for cheaters fine, but proof they cheat fist before akiling them, not because they rank insanly hard and have a lot of bust outs.
(ps. and no i'm not from colossal)
its impossible for an human be on the time he was .....so if that cant proof nothing...your problm
There are more then 1 akill, gabriel had ontime of 81.70% (which is still doable if you don't work/go to school etc) But the other ontimes were:
Pancake --> 52.62%
Kriemheld --> 64.77%
Castiel --> 65.20%
Those other 3 ontimes doesn't same to be impossible to reach at all when ranking/busting hard, so what's your point?
Admins need to show proof before akilling
+1 this exactly akilling cheaters is good but not randomly, ontimes doesn't proof anything, use of teamviewer can't even be detected by an admin if they were using that at all, which doesn't have to be the case (I know several people that wake up every 3 hours to do a heist, and only bust on their own account and get 27.5+ bo's easily in 1 week) I'm very interested to see the proof the admins have instead, which we won't get sadly...
Killing cheaters is good, and admin akill the scripters also please, but show proof, otherwise it seems/and is in some cases so random.
When one of the accounts wasn't even ours, you know there is no proof. We wouldn't share rotten food with MurderInc if he was starving to death, bleeding profusely from his groin-wound, let alone share our our accounts with him.
I think you'll find I killed you plenty in backfire all those times you suicided on me. To be fair though we hadn't 'activated' you as our Colossal sleeper agent back then.
Anonymous (14:54:09 - 01-09)
Anonymous at 14:42:32 on 01/09:
+1 this exactly akilling cheaters is good but not randomly, ontimes doesn't proof anything, use of teamviewer can't even be detected by an admin if they were using that at all, which doesn't have to be the case (I know several people that wake up every 3 hours to do a heist, and only bust on their own account and get 27.5+ bo's easily in 1 week) I'm very interested to see the proof the admins have instead, which we won't get sadly...
Killing cheaters is good, and admin akill the scripters also please, but show proof, otherwise it seems/and is in some cases so random.
Anonymous at 14:32:59 on 01/09:
There are more then 1 akill, gabriel had ontime of 81.70% (which is still doable if you don't work/go to school etc) But the other ontimes were:
Pancake --> 52.62%
Kriemheld --> 64.77%
Castiel --> 65.20%
Those other 3 ontimes doesn't same to be impossible to reach at all when ranking/busting hard, so what's your point?
Admins need to show proof before akilling
Anonymous at 14:28:33 on 01/09:
its impossible for an human be on the time he was .....so if that cant proof nothing...your problm
Anonymous at 14:25:58 on 01/09:
Presumption of innocence --> "Innocent until proven guilty"
The admins have no proof (they always say they have proof but they can't show you), in a trial for court you can't be convicted by a judge that says "yeah i convict you because i have proof but i can't show you the proof i'm sorry", that's not how it works.
I'm 100% against cheaters, but the fact that they rank and bust hard doesn't make them cheaters.
Admins should stop akilling people without showing proof of the cheating what is already happening for some versions.
Akill for cheaters fine, but proof they cheat fist before akiling them, not because they rank insanly hard and have a lot of bust outs.
(ps. and no i'm not from colossal)
Presumption of innocence --> "Innocent until proven guilty"
The admins have no proof (they always say they have proof but they can't show you), in a trial for court you can't be convicted by a judge that says "yeah i convict you because i have proof but i can't show you the proof i'm sorry", that's not how it works.
I'm 100% against cheaters, but the fact that they rank and bust hard doesn't make them cheaters.
Admins should stop akilling people without showing proof of the cheating what is already happening for some versions.
Akill for cheaters fine, but proof they cheat fist before akiling them, not because they rank insanly hard and have a lot of bust outs.
(ps. and no i'm not from colossal)
its impossible for an human be on the time he was .....so if that cant proof nothing...your problm
There are more then 1 akill, gabriel had ontime of 81.70% (which is still doable if you don't work/go to school etc) But the other ontimes were:
Pancake --> 52.62%
Kriemheld --> 64.77%
Castiel --> 65.20%
Those other 3 ontimes doesn't same to be impossible to reach at all when ranking/busting hard, so what's your point?
Admins need to show proof before akilling
+1 this exactly akilling cheaters is good but not randomly, ontimes doesn't proof anything, use of teamviewer can't even be detected by an admin if they were using that at all, which doesn't have to be the case (I know several people that wake up every 3 hours to do a heist, and only bust on their own account and get 27.5+ bo's easily in 1 week) I'm very interested to see the proof the admins have instead, which we won't get sadly...
Killing cheaters is good, and admin akill the scripters also please, but show proof, otherwise it seems/and is in some cases so random.
its not "use of teamviewer"..
its " using "
Redvendetta at 14:48:01 on 01/09:
When one of the accounts wasn't even ours, you know there is no proof. We wouldn't share rotten food with MurderInc if he was starving to death, bleeding profusely from his groin-wound, let alone share our our accounts with him.
Anonymous at 14:42:32 on 01/09:
+1 this exactly akilling cheaters is good but not randomly, ontimes doesn't proof anything, use of teamviewer can't even be detected by an admin if they were using that at all, which doesn't have to be the case (I know several people that wake up every 3 hours to do a heist, and only bust on their own account and get 27.5+ bo's easily in 1 week) I'm very interested to see the proof the admins have instead, which we won't get sadly...
Killing cheaters is good, and admin akill the scripters also please, but show proof, otherwise it seems/and is in some cases so random.
Anonymous at 14:32:59 on 01/09:
There are more then 1 akill, gabriel had ontime of 81.70% (which is still doable if you don't work/go to school etc) But the other ontimes were:
Pancake --> 52.62%
Kriemheld --> 64.77%
Castiel --> 65.20%
Those other 3 ontimes doesn't same to be impossible to reach at all when ranking/busting hard, so what's your point?
Admins need to show proof before akilling
Anonymous at 14:28:33 on 01/09:
its impossible for an human be on the time he was .....so if that cant proof nothing...your problm
Anonymous at 14:25:58 on 01/09:
Presumption of innocence --> "Innocent until proven guilty"
The admins have no proof (they always say they have proof but they can't show you), in a trial for court you can't be convicted by a judge that says "yeah i convict you because i have proof but i can't show you the proof i'm sorry", that's not how it works.
I'm 100% against cheaters, but the fact that they rank and bust hard doesn't make them cheaters.
Admins should stop akilling people without showing proof of the cheating what is already happening for some versions.
Akill for cheaters fine, but proof they cheat fist before akiling them, not because they rank insanly hard and have a lot of bust outs.
(ps. and no i'm not from colossal)
Presumption of innocence --> "Innocent until proven guilty"
The admins have no proof (they always say they have proof but they can't show you), in a trial for court you can't be convicted by a judge that says "yeah i convict you because i have proof but i can't show you the proof i'm sorry", that's not how it works.
I'm 100% against cheaters, but the fact that they rank and bust hard doesn't make them cheaters.
Admins should stop akilling people without showing proof of the cheating what is already happening for some versions.
Akill for cheaters fine, but proof they cheat fist before akiling them, not because they rank insanly hard and have a lot of bust outs.
(ps. and no i'm not from colossal)
its impossible for an human be on the time he was .....so if that cant proof nothing...your problm
There are more then 1 akill, gabriel had ontime of 81.70% (which is still doable if you don't work/go to school etc) But the other ontimes were:
Pancake --> 52.62%
Kriemheld --> 64.77%
Castiel --> 65.20%
Those other 3 ontimes doesn't same to be impossible to reach at all when ranking/busting hard, so what's your point?
Admins need to show proof before akilling
+1 this exactly akilling cheaters is good but not randomly, ontimes doesn't proof anything, use of teamviewer can't even be detected by an admin if they were using that at all, which doesn't have to be the case (I know several people that wake up every 3 hours to do a heist, and only bust on their own account and get 27.5+ bo's easily in 1 week) I'm very interested to see the proof the admins have instead, which we won't get sadly...
Killing cheaters is good, and admin akill the scripters also please, but show proof, otherwise it seems/and is in some cases so random.
When one of the accounts wasn't even ours, you know there is no proof. We wouldn't share rotten food with MurderInc if he was starving to death, bleeding profusely from his groin-wound, let alone share our our accounts with him.
Redvendetta (14:48:01 - 01-09)
Anonymous at 14:42:32 on 01/09:
+1 this exactly akilling cheaters is good but not randomly, ontimes doesn't proof anything, use of teamviewer can't even be detected by an admin if they were using that at all, which doesn't have to be the case (I know several people that wake up every 3 hours to do a heist, and only bust on their own account and get 27.5+ bo's easily in 1 week) I'm very interested to see the proof the admins have instead, which we won't get sadly...
Killing cheaters is good, and admin akill the scripters also please, but show proof, otherwise it seems/and is in some cases so random.
Anonymous at 14:32:59 on 01/09:
There are more then 1 akill, gabriel had ontime of 81.70% (which is still doable if you don't work/go to school etc) But the other ontimes were:
Pancake --> 52.62%
Kriemheld --> 64.77%
Castiel --> 65.20%
Those other 3 ontimes doesn't same to be impossible to reach at all when ranking/busting hard, so what's your point?
Admins need to show proof before akilling
Anonymous at 14:28:33 on 01/09:
its impossible for an human be on the time he was .....so if that cant proof nothing...your problm
Anonymous at 14:25:58 on 01/09:
Presumption of innocence --> "Innocent until proven guilty"
The admins have no proof (they always say they have proof but they can't show you), in a trial for court you can't be convicted by a judge that says "yeah i convict you because i have proof but i can't show you the proof i'm sorry", that's not how it works.
I'm 100% against cheaters, but the fact that they rank and bust hard doesn't make them cheaters.
Admins should stop akilling people without showing proof of the cheating what is already happening for some versions.
Akill for cheaters fine, but proof they cheat fist before akiling them, not because they rank insanly hard and have a lot of bust outs.
(ps. and no i'm not from colossal)
Presumption of innocence --> "Innocent until proven guilty"
The admins have no proof (they always say they have proof but they can't show you), in a trial for court you can't be convicted by a judge that says "yeah i convict you because i have proof but i can't show you the proof i'm sorry", that's not how it works.
I'm 100% against cheaters, but the fact that they rank and bust hard doesn't make them cheaters.
Admins should stop akilling people without showing proof of the cheating what is already happening for some versions.
Akill for cheaters fine, but proof they cheat fist before akiling them, not because they rank insanly hard and have a lot of bust outs.
(ps. and no i'm not from colossal)
its impossible for an human be on the time he was .....so if that cant proof nothing...your problm
There are more then 1 akill, gabriel had ontime of 81.70% (which is still doable if you don't work/go to school etc) But the other ontimes were:
Pancake --> 52.62%
Kriemheld --> 64.77%
Castiel --> 65.20%
Those other 3 ontimes doesn't same to be impossible to reach at all when ranking/busting hard, so what's your point?
Admins need to show proof before akilling
+1 this exactly akilling cheaters is good but not randomly, ontimes doesn't proof anything, use of teamviewer can't even be detected by an admin if they were using that at all, which doesn't have to be the case (I know several people that wake up every 3 hours to do a heist, and only bust on their own account and get 27.5+ bo's easily in 1 week) I'm very interested to see the proof the admins have instead, which we won't get sadly...
Killing cheaters is good, and admin akill the scripters also please, but show proof, otherwise it seems/and is in some cases so random.
When one of the accounts wasn't even ours, you know there is no proof. We wouldn't share rotten food with MurderInc if he was starving to death, bleeding profusely from his groin-wound, let alone share our our accounts with him.
Anonymous (14:44:32 - 01-09)
Anonymous at 14:41:05 on 01/09:
Thief 25/08/2015 21:34:03 OT 0D 11H 46M
Associate 26/08/2015 09:21:02 OT 0D 15H 3M
Mobster 27/08/2015 00:24:04 OT 0D 19H 13M
Soldier 27/08/2015 19:38:03 OT 1D 2H 6M
Swindler 28/08/2015 21:44:05 OT 1D 1H 38M
Assassin 29/08/2015 23:23:04 OT 1D 13H 8M
Local Chief 31/08/2015 12:32:03 OT 1D 1H 9M
DEAD 01/09/2015 13:41:49 OT
Would of thought that was proof enough, 24hours in front of all other semi legit/legit accounts in only 7 days. Omerta has some sad ppl who can rank a lot and quick. but no one is that much better then the rest. He's pretty much been found holding a gun over the dead body.
Anonymous at 14:32:59 on 01/09:
There are more then 1 akill, gabriel had ontime of 81.70% (which is still doable if you don't work/go to school etc) But the other ontimes were:
Pancake --> 52.62%
Kriemheld --> 64.77%
Castiel --> 65.20%
Those other 3 ontimes doesn't same to be impossible to reach at all when ranking/busting hard, so what's your point?
Admins need to show proof before akilling
Anonymous at 14:28:33 on 01/09:
its impossible for an human be on the time he was .....so if that cant proof nothing...your problm
Anonymous at 14:25:58 on 01/09:
Presumption of innocence --> "Innocent until proven guilty"
The admins have no proof (they always say they have proof but they can't show you), in a trial for court you can't be convicted by a judge that says "yeah i convict you because i have proof but i can't show you the proof i'm sorry", that's not how it works.
I'm 100% against cheaters, but the fact that they rank and bust hard doesn't make them cheaters.
Admins should stop akilling people without showing proof of the cheating what is already happening for some versions.
Akill for cheaters fine, but proof they cheat fist before akiling them, not because they rank insanly hard and have a lot of bust outs.
(ps. and no i'm not from colossal)
Presumption of innocence --> "Innocent until proven guilty"
The admins have no proof (they always say they have proof but they can't show you), in a trial for court you can't be convicted by a judge that says "yeah i convict you because i have proof but i can't show you the proof i'm sorry", that's not how it works.
I'm 100% against cheaters, but the fact that they rank and bust hard doesn't make them cheaters.
Admins should stop akilling people without showing proof of the cheating what is already happening for some versions.
Akill for cheaters fine, but proof they cheat fist before akiling them, not because they rank insanly hard and have a lot of bust outs.
(ps. and no i'm not from colossal)
its impossible for an human be on the time he was .....so if that cant proof nothing...your problm
There are more then 1 akill, gabriel had ontime of 81.70% (which is still doable if you don't work/go to school etc) But the other ontimes were:
Pancake --> 52.62%
Kriemheld --> 64.77%
Castiel --> 65.20%
Those other 3 ontimes doesn't same to be impossible to reach at all when ranking/busting hard, so what's your point?
Admins need to show proof before akilling
Thief 25/08/2015 21:34:03 OT 0D 11H 46M
Associate 26/08/2015 09:21:02 OT 0D 15H 3M
Mobster 27/08/2015 00:24:04 OT 0D 19H 13M
Soldier 27/08/2015 19:38:03 OT 1D 2H 6M
Swindler 28/08/2015 21:44:05 OT 1D 1H 38M
Assassin 29/08/2015 23:23:04 OT 1D 13H 8M
Local Chief 31/08/2015 12:32:03 OT 1D 1H 9M
DEAD 01/09/2015 13:41:49 OT
Would of thought that was proof enough, 24hours in front of all other semi legit/legit accounts in only 7 days. Omerta has some sad ppl who can rank a lot and quick. but no one is that much better then the rest. He's pretty much been found holding a gun over the dead body.
Your only talking about gabriel with that, what about the other 3 then? Where is the proof they cheated?
Anonymous at 14:40:28 on 01/09:
its all about you right? you are the best #1 .com #1 .nl ...now try to rank without cheats if you do and still #1 in both versions ill be the first to glad you...until then you sttil a piece of shit like all cheatrs.
MurderInc at 14:34:57 on 01/09:
Hi Ari. Take your politics and shove them up your ass, this isn't about that.
Marazz at 14:33:33 on 01/09:
Don't worry fag. You weren't going to see "chief" rank anyways.
MurderInc at 14:26:38 on 01/09:
Fun little story.
I've been trying to rank anonymous until brug. Colossal took me in until we could up Siberia safely. My ingame was Kriemhild.
Apparently I've also been sharing my account with "my" don Gabriel, and still managed to do 25k busts myself, and reach 64% ontime. Oh, and as a little sideproject, I also play .nl and ranked #1 there with 57% ontime. All that while I was constantly sharing with Bruce and doing busts for him.
Can I get a medal or something?
I'll leave you with this little gem:
[16:06:31] <MurderInc> i'm also ranking on .nl
[16:06:32] <MurderInc> #1 ranker there
[16:06:38] <MurderInc> can you explain how i rank first page on .com
[16:06:41] <MurderInc> #1 on .nl
[16:06:46] <MurderInc> and still manage to share with bruce?
[16:07:06] <MurderInc> maybe you should akill me there too for ... fuck knows what
[16:08:45] <Laz|around> maybe i will
[16:08:48] <MurderInc> lol
[16:08:50] <Laz|around> maybe i wont
[16:09:03] <Laz|around> depends if you cheat too on .nl
The god complex is strong with this one.
Fun little story.
I've been trying to rank anonymous until brug. Colossal took me in until we could up Siberia safely. My ingame was Kriemhild.
Apparently I've also been sharing my account with "my" don Gabriel, and still managed to do 25k busts myself, and reach 64% ontime. Oh, and as a little sideproject, I also play .nl and ranked #1 there with 57% ontime. All that while I was constantly sharing with Bruce and doing busts for him.
Can I get a medal or something?
I'll leave you with this little gem:
[16:06:31] <MurderInc> i'm also ranking on .nl
[16:06:32] <MurderInc> #1 ranker there
[16:06:38] <MurderInc> can you explain how i rank first page on .com
[16:06:41] <MurderInc> #1 on .nl
[16:06:46] <MurderInc> and still manage to share with bruce?
[16:07:06] <MurderInc> maybe you should akill me there too for ... fuck knows what
[16:08:45] <Laz|around> maybe i will
[16:08:48] <MurderInc> lol
[16:08:50] <Laz|around> maybe i wont
[16:09:03] <Laz|around> depends if you cheat too on .nl
The god complex is strong with this one.
Don't worry fag. You weren't going to see "chief" rank anyways.
its all about you right? you are the best #1 .com #1 .nl ...now try to rank without cheats if you do and still #1 in both versions ill be the first to glad you...until then you sttil a piece of shit like all cheatrs.
Anonymous (14:42:32 - 01-09)
Anonymous at 14:32:59 on 01/09:
There are more then 1 akill, gabriel had ontime of 81.70% (which is still doable if you don't work/go to school etc) But the other ontimes were:
Pancake --> 52.62%
Kriemheld --> 64.77%
Castiel --> 65.20%
Those other 3 ontimes doesn't same to be impossible to reach at all when ranking/busting hard, so what's your point?
Admins need to show proof before akilling
Anonymous at 14:28:33 on 01/09:
its impossible for an human be on the time he was .....so if that cant proof nothing...your problm
Anonymous at 14:25:58 on 01/09:
Presumption of innocence --> "Innocent until proven guilty"
The admins have no proof (they always say they have proof but they can't show you), in a trial for court you can't be convicted by a judge that says "yeah i convict you because i have proof but i can't show you the proof i'm sorry", that's not how it works.
I'm 100% against cheaters, but the fact that they rank and bust hard doesn't make them cheaters.
Admins should stop akilling people without showing proof of the cheating what is already happening for some versions.
Akill for cheaters fine, but proof they cheat fist before akiling them, not because they rank insanly hard and have a lot of bust outs.
(ps. and no i'm not from colossal)
Presumption of innocence --> "Innocent until proven guilty"
The admins have no proof (they always say they have proof but they can't show you), in a trial for court you can't be convicted by a judge that says "yeah i convict you because i have proof but i can't show you the proof i'm sorry", that's not how it works.
I'm 100% against cheaters, but the fact that they rank and bust hard doesn't make them cheaters.
Admins should stop akilling people without showing proof of the cheating what is already happening for some versions.
Akill for cheaters fine, but proof they cheat fist before akiling them, not because they rank insanly hard and have a lot of bust outs.
(ps. and no i'm not from colossal)
its impossible for an human be on the time he was .....so if that cant proof nothing...your problm
There are more then 1 akill, gabriel had ontime of 81.70% (which is still doable if you don't work/go to school etc) But the other ontimes were:
Pancake --> 52.62%
Kriemheld --> 64.77%
Castiel --> 65.20%
Those other 3 ontimes doesn't same to be impossible to reach at all when ranking/busting hard, so what's your point?
Admins need to show proof before akilling
+1 this exactly akilling cheaters is good but not randomly, ontimes doesn't proof anything, use of teamviewer can't even be detected by an admin if they were using that at all, which doesn't have to be the case (I know several people that wake up every 3 hours to do a heist, and only bust on their own account and get 27.5+ bo's easily in 1 week) I'm very interested to see the proof the admins have instead, which we won't get sadly...
Killing cheaters is good, and admin akill the scripters also please, but show proof, otherwise it seems/and is in some cases so random.
Anonymous (14:41:05 - 01-09)
Anonymous at 14:32:59 on 01/09:
There are more then 1 akill, gabriel had ontime of 81.70% (which is still doable if you don't work/go to school etc) But the other ontimes were:
Pancake --> 52.62%
Kriemheld --> 64.77%
Castiel --> 65.20%
Those other 3 ontimes doesn't same to be impossible to reach at all when ranking/busting hard, so what's your point?
Admins need to show proof before akilling
Anonymous at 14:28:33 on 01/09:
its impossible for an human be on the time he was .....so if that cant proof nothing...your problm
Anonymous at 14:25:58 on 01/09:
Presumption of innocence --> "Innocent until proven guilty"
The admins have no proof (they always say they have proof but they can't show you), in a trial for court you can't be convicted by a judge that says "yeah i convict you because i have proof but i can't show you the proof i'm sorry", that's not how it works.
I'm 100% against cheaters, but the fact that they rank and bust hard doesn't make them cheaters.
Admins should stop akilling people without showing proof of the cheating what is already happening for some versions.
Akill for cheaters fine, but proof they cheat fist before akiling them, not because they rank insanly hard and have a lot of bust outs.
(ps. and no i'm not from colossal)
Presumption of innocence --> "Innocent until proven guilty"
The admins have no proof (they always say they have proof but they can't show you), in a trial for court you can't be convicted by a judge that says "yeah i convict you because i have proof but i can't show you the proof i'm sorry", that's not how it works.
I'm 100% against cheaters, but the fact that they rank and bust hard doesn't make them cheaters.
Admins should stop akilling people without showing proof of the cheating what is already happening for some versions.
Akill for cheaters fine, but proof they cheat fist before akiling them, not because they rank insanly hard and have a lot of bust outs.
(ps. and no i'm not from colossal)
its impossible for an human be on the time he was .....so if that cant proof nothing...your problm
There are more then 1 akill, gabriel had ontime of 81.70% (which is still doable if you don't work/go to school etc) But the other ontimes were:
Pancake --> 52.62%
Kriemheld --> 64.77%
Castiel --> 65.20%
Those other 3 ontimes doesn't same to be impossible to reach at all when ranking/busting hard, so what's your point?
Admins need to show proof before akilling
Thief 25/08/2015 21:34:03 OT 0D 11H 46M
Associate 26/08/2015 09:21:02 OT 0D 15H 3M
Mobster 27/08/2015 00:24:04 OT 0D 19H 13M
Soldier 27/08/2015 19:38:03 OT 1D 2H 6M
Swindler 28/08/2015 21:44:05 OT 1D 1H 38M
Assassin 29/08/2015 23:23:04 OT 1D 13H 8M
Local Chief 31/08/2015 12:32:03 OT 1D 1H 9M
DEAD 01/09/2015 13:41:49 OT
Would of thought that was proof enough, 24hours in front of all other semi legit/legit accounts in only 7 days. Omerta has some sad ppl who can rank a lot and quick. but no one is that much better then the rest. He's pretty much been found holding a gun over the dead body.
Anonymous (14:40:28 - 01-09)
MurderInc at 14:34:57 on 01/09:
Hi Ari. Take your politics and shove them up your ass, this isn't about that.
Marazz at 14:33:33 on 01/09:
Don't worry fag. You weren't going to see "chief" rank anyways.
MurderInc at 14:26:38 on 01/09:
Fun little story.
I've been trying to rank anonymous until brug. Colossal took me in until we could up Siberia safely. My ingame was Kriemhild.
Apparently I've also been sharing my account with "my" don Gabriel, and still managed to do 25k busts myself, and reach 64% ontime. Oh, and as a little sideproject, I also play .nl and ranked #1 there with 57% ontime. All that while I was constantly sharing with Bruce and doing busts for him.
Can I get a medal or something?
I'll leave you with this little gem:
[16:06:31] <MurderInc> i'm also ranking on .nl
[16:06:32] <MurderInc> #1 ranker there
[16:06:38] <MurderInc> can you explain how i rank first page on .com
[16:06:41] <MurderInc> #1 on .nl
[16:06:46] <MurderInc> and still manage to share with bruce?
[16:07:06] <MurderInc> maybe you should akill me there too for ... fuck knows what
[16:08:45] <Laz|around> maybe i will
[16:08:48] <MurderInc> lol
[16:08:50] <Laz|around> maybe i wont
[16:09:03] <Laz|around> depends if you cheat too on .nl
The god complex is strong with this one.
Fun little story.
I've been trying to rank anonymous until brug. Colossal took me in until we could up Siberia safely. My ingame was Kriemhild.
Apparently I've also been sharing my account with "my" don Gabriel, and still managed to do 25k busts myself, and reach 64% ontime. Oh, and as a little sideproject, I also play .nl and ranked #1 there with 57% ontime. All that while I was constantly sharing with Bruce and doing busts for him.
Can I get a medal or something?
I'll leave you with this little gem:
[16:06:31] <MurderInc> i'm also ranking on .nl
[16:06:32] <MurderInc> #1 ranker there
[16:06:38] <MurderInc> can you explain how i rank first page on .com
[16:06:41] <MurderInc> #1 on .nl
[16:06:46] <MurderInc> and still manage to share with bruce?
[16:07:06] <MurderInc> maybe you should akill me there too for ... fuck knows what
[16:08:45] <Laz|around> maybe i will
[16:08:48] <MurderInc> lol
[16:08:50] <Laz|around> maybe i wont
[16:09:03] <Laz|around> depends if you cheat too on .nl
The god complex is strong with this one.
Don't worry fag. You weren't going to see "chief" rank anyways.
its all about you right? you are the best #1 .com #1 .nl ...now try to rank without cheats if you do and still #1 in both versions ill be the first to glad you...until then you sttil a piece of shit like all cheatrs.
Marazz at 14:33:33 on 01/09:
Don't worry fag. You weren't going to see "chief" rank anyways.
MurderInc at 14:26:38 on 01/09:
Fun little story.
I've been trying to rank anonymous until brug. Colossal took me in until we could up Siberia safely. My ingame was Kriemhild.
Apparently I've also been sharing my account with "my" don Gabriel, and still managed to do 25k busts myself, and reach 64% ontime. Oh, and as a little sideproject, I also play .nl and ranked #1 there with 57% ontime. All that while I was constantly sharing with Bruce and doing busts for him.
Can I get a medal or something?
I'll leave you with this little gem:
[16:06:31] <MurderInc> i'm also ranking on .nl
[16:06:32] <MurderInc> #1 ranker there
[16:06:38] <MurderInc> can you explain how i rank first page on .com
[16:06:41] <MurderInc> #1 on .nl
[16:06:46] <MurderInc> and still manage to share with bruce?
[16:07:06] <MurderInc> maybe you should akill me there too for ... fuck knows what
[16:08:45] <Laz|around> maybe i will
[16:08:48] <MurderInc> lol
[16:08:50] <Laz|around> maybe i wont
[16:09:03] <Laz|around> depends if you cheat too on .nl
The god complex is strong with this one.
Fun little story.
I've been trying to rank anonymous until brug. Colossal took me in until we could up Siberia safely. My ingame was Kriemhild.
Apparently I've also been sharing my account with "my" don Gabriel, and still managed to do 25k busts myself, and reach 64% ontime. Oh, and as a little sideproject, I also play .nl and ranked #1 there with 57% ontime. All that while I was constantly sharing with Bruce and doing busts for him.
Can I get a medal or something?
I'll leave you with this little gem:
[16:06:31] <MurderInc> i'm also ranking on .nl
[16:06:32] <MurderInc> #1 ranker there
[16:06:38] <MurderInc> can you explain how i rank first page on .com
[16:06:41] <MurderInc> #1 on .nl
[16:06:46] <MurderInc> and still manage to share with bruce?
[16:07:06] <MurderInc> maybe you should akill me there too for ... fuck knows what
[16:08:45] <Laz|around> maybe i will
[16:08:48] <MurderInc> lol
[16:08:50] <Laz|around> maybe i wont
[16:09:03] <Laz|around> depends if you cheat too on .nl
The god complex is strong with this one.
Don't worry fag. You weren't going to see "chief" rank anyways.
Marazz (14:33:33 - 01-09)
MurderInc at 14:26:38 on 01/09:
Fun little story.
I've been trying to rank anonymous until brug. Colossal took me in until we could up Siberia safely. My ingame was Kriemhild.
Apparently I've also been sharing my account with "my" don Gabriel, and still managed to do 25k busts myself, and reach 64% ontime. Oh, and as a little sideproject, I also play .nl and ranked #1 there with 57% ontime. All that while I was constantly sharing with Bruce and doing busts for him.
Can I get a medal or something?
I'll leave you with this little gem:
[16:06:31] <MurderInc> i'm also ranking on .nl
[16:06:32] <MurderInc> #1 ranker there
[16:06:38] <MurderInc> can you explain how i rank first page on .com
[16:06:41] <MurderInc> #1 on .nl
[16:06:46] <MurderInc> and still manage to share with bruce?
[16:07:06] <MurderInc> maybe you should akill me there too for ... fuck knows what
[16:08:45] <Laz|around> maybe i will
[16:08:48] <MurderInc> lol
[16:08:50] <Laz|around> maybe i wont
[16:09:03] <Laz|around> depends if you cheat too on .nl
The god complex is strong with this one.
Fun little story.
I've been trying to rank anonymous until brug. Colossal took me in until we could up Siberia safely. My ingame was Kriemhild.
Apparently I've also been sharing my account with "my" don Gabriel, and still managed to do 25k busts myself, and reach 64% ontime. Oh, and as a little sideproject, I also play .nl and ranked #1 there with 57% ontime. All that while I was constantly sharing with Bruce and doing busts for him.
Can I get a medal or something?
I'll leave you with this little gem:
[16:06:31] <MurderInc> i'm also ranking on .nl
[16:06:32] <MurderInc> #1 ranker there
[16:06:38] <MurderInc> can you explain how i rank first page on .com
[16:06:41] <MurderInc> #1 on .nl
[16:06:46] <MurderInc> and still manage to share with bruce?
[16:07:06] <MurderInc> maybe you should akill me there too for ... fuck knows what
[16:08:45] <Laz|around> maybe i will
[16:08:48] <MurderInc> lol
[16:08:50] <Laz|around> maybe i wont
[16:09:03] <Laz|around> depends if you cheat too on .nl
The god complex is strong with this one.
Don't worry fag. You weren't going to see "chief" rank anyways.
Anonymous (14:32:59 - 01-09)
Anonymous at 14:28:33 on 01/09:
its impossible for an human be on the time he was .....so if that cant proof nothing...your problm
Anonymous at 14:25:58 on 01/09:
Presumption of innocence --> "Innocent until proven guilty"
The admins have no proof (they always say they have proof but they can't show you), in a trial for court you can't be convicted by a judge that says "yeah i convict you because i have proof but i can't show you the proof i'm sorry", that's not how it works.
I'm 100% against cheaters, but the fact that they rank and bust hard doesn't make them cheaters.
Admins should stop akilling people without showing proof of the cheating what is already happening for some versions.
Akill for cheaters fine, but proof they cheat fist before akiling them, not because they rank insanly hard and have a lot of bust outs.
(ps. and no i'm not from colossal)
Presumption of innocence --> "Innocent until proven guilty"
The admins have no proof (they always say they have proof but they can't show you), in a trial for court you can't be convicted by a judge that says "yeah i convict you because i have proof but i can't show you the proof i'm sorry", that's not how it works.
I'm 100% against cheaters, but the fact that they rank and bust hard doesn't make them cheaters.
Admins should stop akilling people without showing proof of the cheating what is already happening for some versions.
Akill for cheaters fine, but proof they cheat fist before akiling them, not because they rank insanly hard and have a lot of bust outs.
(ps. and no i'm not from colossal)
its impossible for an human be on the time he was .....so if that cant proof nothing...your problm
There are more then 1 akill, gabriel had ontime of 81.70% (which is still doable if you don't work/go to school etc) But the other ontimes were:
Pancake --> 52.62%
Kriemheld --> 64.77%
Castiel --> 65.20%
Those other 3 ontimes doesn't same to be impossible to reach at all when ranking/busting hard, so what's your point?
Admins need to show proof before akilling
Anonymous (14:30:21 - 01-09)
Anonymous at 14:25:58 on 01/09:
Presumption of innocence --> "Innocent until proven guilty"
The admins have no proof (they always say they have proof but they can't show you), in a trial for court you can't be convicted by a judge that says "yeah i convict you because i have proof but i can't show you the proof i'm sorry", that's not how it works.
I'm 100% against cheaters, but the fact that they rank and bust hard doesn't make them cheaters.
Admins should stop akilling people without showing proof of the cheating what is already happening for some versions.
Akill for cheaters fine, but proof they cheat fist before akiling them, not because they rank insanly hard and have a lot of bust outs.
(ps. and no i'm not from colossal)
Presumption of innocence --> "Innocent until proven guilty"
The admins have no proof (they always say they have proof but they can't show you), in a trial for court you can't be convicted by a judge that says "yeah i convict you because i have proof but i can't show you the proof i'm sorry", that's not how it works.
I'm 100% against cheaters, but the fact that they rank and bust hard doesn't make them cheaters.
Admins should stop akilling people without showing proof of the cheating what is already happening for some versions.
Akill for cheaters fine, but proof they cheat fist before akiling them, not because they rank insanly hard and have a lot of bust outs.
(ps. and no i'm not from colossal)
Anonymous (14:30:15 - 01-09)
MurderInc at 14:26:38 on 01/09:
Fun little story.
I've been trying to rank anonymous until brug. Colossal took me in until we could up Siberia safely. My ingame was Kriemhild.
Apparently I've also been sharing my account with "my" don Gabriel, and still managed to do 25k busts myself, and reach 64% ontime. Oh, and as a little sideproject, I also play .nl and ranked #1 there with 57% ontime. All that while I was constantly sharing with Bruce and doing busts for him.
Can I get a medal or something?
I'll leave you with this little gem:
[16:06:31] <MurderInc> i'm also ranking on .nl
[16:06:32] <MurderInc> #1 ranker there
[16:06:38] <MurderInc> can you explain how i rank first page on .com
[16:06:41] <MurderInc> #1 on .nl
[16:06:46] <MurderInc> and still manage to share with bruce?
[16:07:06] <MurderInc> maybe you should akill me there too for ... fuck knows what
[16:08:45] <Laz|around> maybe i will
[16:08:48] <MurderInc> lol
[16:08:50] <Laz|around> maybe i wont
[16:09:03] <Laz|around> depends if you cheat too on .nl
The god complex is strong with this one.
Fun little story.
I've been trying to rank anonymous until brug. Colossal took me in until we could up Siberia safely. My ingame was Kriemhild.
Apparently I've also been sharing my account with "my" don Gabriel, and still managed to do 25k busts myself, and reach 64% ontime. Oh, and as a little sideproject, I also play .nl and ranked #1 there with 57% ontime. All that while I was constantly sharing with Bruce and doing busts for him.
Can I get a medal or something?
I'll leave you with this little gem:
[16:06:31] <MurderInc> i'm also ranking on .nl
[16:06:32] <MurderInc> #1 ranker there
[16:06:38] <MurderInc> can you explain how i rank first page on .com
[16:06:41] <MurderInc> #1 on .nl
[16:06:46] <MurderInc> and still manage to share with bruce?
[16:07:06] <MurderInc> maybe you should akill me there too for ... fuck knows what
[16:08:45] <Laz|around> maybe i will
[16:08:48] <MurderInc> lol
[16:08:50] <Laz|around> maybe i wont
[16:09:03] <Laz|around> depends if you cheat too on .nl
The god complex is strong with this one.
you talk too much....always for your porpose but its not always right ;)
Oh and on the subject.. Unlegit Akills? Damn didn't think it was possible. Your fat ass was enjoying them couple versions ago tho meh