» Menu
» OB/Site News
» Articles
» Barafranca News
|
article
Gambino goes down as it's don Riviera is a-killed by the admins.
Update:
Gambino isn't the only victim today, several other families lose their gangsters by admin hands.
Update #2:
Marazzino also goes down later this evening as the current #1 of the game, the don of Marazzino, get a-killed.
Update:
Gambino isn't the only victim today, several other families lose their gangsters by admin hands.
Update #2:
Marazzino also goes down later this evening as the current #1 of the game, the don of Marazzino, get a-killed.
statistics
War started on: 13:32:02 06-01-2015 | War ended on: 21:35:02 06-01-2015 |
Bullet difference: +949,917 | War duration: 8h 3m |
Money difference: -$558,791,970 | Players died: 38 |
deaths
PeterPanAirLines (16:38:20 - 06-01)
PeterPanAirLines (16:35:47 - 06-01)
JokeGame at 16:29:35 on 06/01:
first time im completely agree with u :D
so or mr brando the cop close the version and the game and say sorry to me hoofbite terencio and mugs or let reviwe all accounts akilled for "ive heard u use teamviewer" ... and i have to delete my facebook as well mr brando the cop or i can still use it ?
MurderInc at 16:23:01 on 06/01:
yeah, never been sure how the crew claims to be able to detect sharing. I mean obviously if you do something as stupid as saving your TeamViewer IDs in your capo channel topic (some fam did that a couple of versions ago and got akilled), it's pretty easy. But unless their was some communication screw-up between the sharers, the only thing I can think of that they could go on would be comparing the login times. While that might correlate with sharing, there are plenty of other explanations as well, so it's a bit extreme to see akills for that. They definitely don't have a way to detect TeamViewer usage as such, since it's not detectable remotely or from within the browser sandbox (meaning the only way they could do it would be through a browser exploit, and that would be both illegal and absurd.) Besides, we would see a whole lot more akills if it would be that easy.
yeah, never been sure how the crew claims to be able to detect sharing. I mean obviously if you do something as stupid as saving your TeamViewer IDs in your capo channel topic (some fam did that a couple of versions ago and got akilled), it's pretty easy. But unless their was some communication screw-up between the sharers, the only thing I can think of that they could go on would be comparing the login times. While that might correlate with sharing, there are plenty of other explanations as well, so it's a bit extreme to see akills for that. They definitely don't have a way to detect TeamViewer usage as such, since it's not detectable remotely or from within the browser sandbox (meaning the only way they could do it would be through a browser exploit, and that would be both illegal and absurd.) Besides, we would see a whole lot more akills if it would be that easy.
first time im completely agree with u :D
so or mr brando the cop close the version and the game and say sorry to me hoofbite terencio and mugs or let reviwe all accounts akilled for "ive heard u use teamviewer" ... and i have to delete my facebook as well mr brando the cop or i can still use it ?
i have skype, let me ask bramble if i have to delete it , meh
PeterPanAirLines (16:34:43 - 06-01)
MurderInc at 16:23:01 on 06/01:
They definitely don't have a way to detect TeamViewer usage as such, since it's not detectable remotely or from within the browser sandbox (meaning the only way they could do it would be through a browser exploit, and that would be both illegal and absurd.)
hey miss bramble, laugh now cmon, come here and laughs :) or u akills ppl just cuz u heard somethings or murder.inc its right, u and your boss brando use illegal methods to look into others ppl privacy, wuch is the correct answer? cmon miss come here and laughs with us :)
They definitely don't have a way to detect TeamViewer usage as such, since it's not detectable remotely or from within the browser sandbox (meaning the only way they could do it would be through a browser exploit, and that would be both illegal and absurd.)
hey miss bramble, laugh now cmon, come here and laughs :) or u akills ppl just cuz u heard somethings or murder.inc its right, u and your boss brando use illegal methods to look into others ppl privacy, wuch is the correct answer? cmon miss come here and laughs with us :)
JokeGame (16:29:35 - 06-01)
MurderInc at 16:23:01 on 06/01:
yeah, never been sure how the crew claims to be able to detect sharing. I mean obviously if you do something as stupid as saving your TeamViewer IDs in your capo channel topic (some fam did that a couple of versions ago and got akilled), it's pretty easy. But unless their was some communication screw-up between the sharers, the only thing I can think of that they could go on would be comparing the login times. While that might correlate with sharing, there are plenty of other explanations as well, so it's a bit extreme to see akills for that. They definitely don't have a way to detect TeamViewer usage as such, since it's not detectable remotely or from within the browser sandbox (meaning the only way they could do it would be through a browser exploit, and that would be both illegal and absurd.) Besides, we would see a whole lot more akills if it would be that easy.
yeah, never been sure how the crew claims to be able to detect sharing. I mean obviously if you do something as stupid as saving your TeamViewer IDs in your capo channel topic (some fam did that a couple of versions ago and got akilled), it's pretty easy. But unless their was some communication screw-up between the sharers, the only thing I can think of that they could go on would be comparing the login times. While that might correlate with sharing, there are plenty of other explanations as well, so it's a bit extreme to see akills for that. They definitely don't have a way to detect TeamViewer usage as such, since it's not detectable remotely or from within the browser sandbox (meaning the only way they could do it would be through a browser exploit, and that would be both illegal and absurd.) Besides, we would see a whole lot more akills if it would be that easy.
first time im completely agree with u :D
so or mr brando the cop close the version and the game and say sorry to me hoofbite terencio and mugs or let reviwe all accounts akilled for "ive heard u use teamviewer" ... and i have to delete my facebook as well mr brando the cop or i can still use it ?
MurderInc (16:23:01 - 06-01)
yeah, never been sure how the crew claims to be able to detect sharing. I mean obviously if you do something as stupid as saving your TeamViewer IDs in your capo channel topic (some fam did that a couple of versions ago and got akilled), it's pretty easy. But unless their was some communication screw-up between the sharers, the only thing I can think of that they could go on would be comparing the login times. While that might correlate with sharing, there are plenty of other explanations as well, so it's a bit extreme to see akills for that. They definitely don't have a way to detect TeamViewer usage as such, since it's not detectable remotely or from within the browser sandbox (meaning the only way they could do it would be through a browser exploit, and that would be both illegal and absurd.) Besides, we would see a whole lot more akills if it would be that easy.
Pelotas (16:16:20 - 06-01)
negher at 16:14:28 on 06/01:
how the hell they can look what kind of programm do you use to talk to others peoples ? This is called abuse of privacy and brando is abusing of it
how the hell they can look what kind of programm do you use to talk to others peoples ? This is called abuse of privacy and brando is abusing of it
So if you play omerta you cant use skype facebook chat or whatever to talk to your girlfriend? Who the fuck is Brando to look into others privacy? This is illegal
negher (16:14:28 - 06-01)
how the hell they can look what kind of programm do you use to talk to others peoples ? This is called abuse of privacy and brando is abusing of it
Solstice (16:12:18 - 06-01)
Anonymous at 14:56:32 on 06/01:
mmm just made another super stupid move by sayin that
Leonard at 14:53:09 on 06/01:
I'm not here to defend anyone, I don't know mmm and I barely know Terencio. But I'll say this: that argument is bullshit. You wanted to know more and thats understandable. But saying a piece of news is false because you don't understand everything is bullshit imo
Anonymous at 14:48:48 on 06/01:
Lol he revealed the source, not saying what the reason was, making it even worse for Terencio. I call BS, like so many other news made up by that "reporter"
Leonard at 14:38:06 on 06/01:
That's not so weird. How many times have you seen reporters disclose their sources? Hell, it's part of their code of conduct or whatever, they don't reveal their sources.
Anonymous at 14:36:39 on 06/01:
I agree that it's weird though, reporter claiming to have talked to terencio and got the reason, but he wants it secret? I mean come on .S
Leonard at 14:31:54 on 06/01:
Yes, the Anonymous dude is probably a more reliable source of information
Anonymous at 14:28:10 on 06/01:
mmm, you come out with a lot of bullshit all the time
mmm at 14:27:10 on 06/01:
I asked him and got another story completely, so it's weird of you to throw it out here without anything that even looks like proof, great journalism right there :D
He tells me but didn't tell you... weird!
I asked him and got another story completely, so it's weird of you to throw it out here without anything that even looks like proof, great journalism right there :D
He tells me but didn't tell you... weird!
Yes, the Anonymous dude is probably a more reliable source of information
I agree that it's weird though, reporter claiming to have talked to terencio and got the reason, but he wants it secret? I mean come on .S
That's not so weird. How many times have you seen reporters disclose their sources? Hell, it's part of their code of conduct or whatever, they don't reveal their sources.
Lol he revealed the source, not saying what the reason was, making it even worse for Terencio. I call BS, like so many other news made up by that "reporter"
I'm not here to defend anyone, I don't know mmm and I barely know Terencio. But I'll say this: that argument is bullshit. You wanted to know more and thats understandable. But saying a piece of news is false because you don't understand everything is bullshit imo
Must be heaven to write bullshit and then be able to back it up yourself :D . Oh anonymous, what a live.
PPAL (16:03:09 - 06-01)
Redspeert at 14:41:52 on 06/01:
Comments is comments, article is article.
Articles are to be kept neutral and based on facts, comments is the given person's personal opinion.
Comments is comments, article is article.
Articles are to be kept neutral and based on facts, comments is the given person's personal opinion.
Red can u give me proof that i was sharing my account in teamviewer? also u have seen proof abut terencio and his gf ? i see nothings, i just heard a cow telling me i shared my account, how they know i have teamviewer installed in my computer? second time i made a fam second time akilled for no reason, and why the cow dont akills 3/4 of omerta? u think there is innocents ppl in this game? starting from the owner this game is corrupted in every parts. i have teamviewer installed in my computer? give me the proof i used it for this game, they cant give nothings cuz they have nothigs as proof. but a game runned by amateurs as admins is ofc not trustable, someone say i deserved it, ofc, cuz im not a lick ass like someone else with more than 10 dupes running :)
lame_gambino (15:25:11 - 06-01)
its pretty easy
riviera & mirage used teamvieuwer to log in on eachothers IP
http://d-bot.net/statistics/com/ingame/?ingame=riviera
http://d-bot.net/statistics/com/ingame/?ingame=mirage
all topaccounts are awake a bit too long
riviera & mirage used teamvieuwer to log in on eachothers IP
http://d-bot.net/statistics/com/ingame/?ingame=riviera
http://d-bot.net/statistics/com/ingame/?ingame=mirage
all topaccounts are awake a bit too long
Anonymous (15:00:45 - 06-01)
Better get ready for the war tonight, i bet gambino won't be able to have all their dupes back in the family yet around that time
Anonymous (14:56:32 - 06-01)
Leonard at 14:53:09 on 06/01:
I'm not here to defend anyone, I don't know mmm and I barely know Terencio. But I'll say this: that argument is bullshit. You wanted to know more and thats understandable. But saying a piece of news is false because you don't understand everything is bullshit imo
Anonymous at 14:48:48 on 06/01:
Lol he revealed the source, not saying what the reason was, making it even worse for Terencio. I call BS, like so many other news made up by that "reporter"
Leonard at 14:38:06 on 06/01:
That's not so weird. How many times have you seen reporters disclose their sources? Hell, it's part of their code of conduct or whatever, they don't reveal their sources.
Anonymous at 14:36:39 on 06/01:
I agree that it's weird though, reporter claiming to have talked to terencio and got the reason, but he wants it secret? I mean come on .S
Leonard at 14:31:54 on 06/01:
Yes, the Anonymous dude is probably a more reliable source of information
Anonymous at 14:28:10 on 06/01:
mmm, you come out with a lot of bullshit all the time
mmm at 14:27:10 on 06/01:
I asked him and got another story completely, so it's weird of you to throw it out here without anything that even looks like proof, great journalism right there :D
He tells me but didn't tell you... weird!
I asked him and got another story completely, so it's weird of you to throw it out here without anything that even looks like proof, great journalism right there :D
He tells me but didn't tell you... weird!
Yes, the Anonymous dude is probably a more reliable source of information
I agree that it's weird though, reporter claiming to have talked to terencio and got the reason, but he wants it secret? I mean come on .S
That's not so weird. How many times have you seen reporters disclose their sources? Hell, it's part of their code of conduct or whatever, they don't reveal their sources.
Lol he revealed the source, not saying what the reason was, making it even worse for Terencio. I call BS, like so many other news made up by that "reporter"
I'm not here to defend anyone, I don't know mmm and I barely know Terencio. But I'll say this: that argument is bullshit. You wanted to know more and thats understandable. But saying a piece of news is false because you don't understand everything is bullshit imo
Anonymous (14:56:13 - 06-01)
Leonard at 14:53:09 on 06/01:
I'm not here to defend anyone, I don't know mmm and I barely know Terencio. But I'll say this: that argument is bullshit. You wanted to know more and thats understandable. But saying a piece of news is false because you don't understand everything is bullshit imo
Anonymous at 14:48:48 on 06/01:
Lol he revealed the source, not saying what the reason was, making it even worse for Terencio. I call BS, like so many other news made up by that "reporter"
Leonard at 14:38:06 on 06/01:
That's not so weird. How many times have you seen reporters disclose their sources? Hell, it's part of their code of conduct or whatever, they don't reveal their sources.
Anonymous at 14:36:39 on 06/01:
I agree that it's weird though, reporter claiming to have talked to terencio and got the reason, but he wants it secret? I mean come on .S
Leonard at 14:31:54 on 06/01:
Yes, the Anonymous dude is probably a more reliable source of information
Anonymous at 14:28:10 on 06/01:
mmm, you come out with a lot of bullshit all the time
mmm at 14:27:10 on 06/01:
I asked him and got another story completely, so it's weird of you to throw it out here without anything that even looks like proof, great journalism right there :D
He tells me but didn't tell you... weird!
I asked him and got another story completely, so it's weird of you to throw it out here without anything that even looks like proof, great journalism right there :D
He tells me but didn't tell you... weird!
Yes, the Anonymous dude is probably a more reliable source of information
I agree that it's weird though, reporter claiming to have talked to terencio and got the reason, but he wants it secret? I mean come on .S
That's not so weird. How many times have you seen reporters disclose their sources? Hell, it's part of their code of conduct or whatever, they don't reveal their sources.
Lol he revealed the source, not saying what the reason was, making it even worse for Terencio. I call BS, like so many other news made up by that "reporter"
I'm not here to defend anyone, I don't know mmm and I barely know Terencio. But I'll say this: that argument is bullshit. You wanted to know more and thats understandable. But saying a piece of news is false because you don't understand everything is bullshit imo
Well either you report it, or you don't. Terencio has said something else to his trusted friends then what is reported here. So it's a very weak piece of work to report it as a fact, without any proof that this conversation even took place. Poor job indeed.
Leonard (14:53:09 - 06-01)
Anonymous at 14:48:48 on 06/01:
Lol he revealed the source, not saying what the reason was, making it even worse for Terencio. I call BS, like so many other news made up by that "reporter"
Leonard at 14:38:06 on 06/01:
That's not so weird. How many times have you seen reporters disclose their sources? Hell, it's part of their code of conduct or whatever, they don't reveal their sources.
Anonymous at 14:36:39 on 06/01:
I agree that it's weird though, reporter claiming to have talked to terencio and got the reason, but he wants it secret? I mean come on .S
Leonard at 14:31:54 on 06/01:
Yes, the Anonymous dude is probably a more reliable source of information
Anonymous at 14:28:10 on 06/01:
mmm, you come out with a lot of bullshit all the time
mmm at 14:27:10 on 06/01:
I asked him and got another story completely, so it's weird of you to throw it out here without anything that even looks like proof, great journalism right there :D
He tells me but didn't tell you... weird!
I asked him and got another story completely, so it's weird of you to throw it out here without anything that even looks like proof, great journalism right there :D
He tells me but didn't tell you... weird!
Yes, the Anonymous dude is probably a more reliable source of information
I agree that it's weird though, reporter claiming to have talked to terencio and got the reason, but he wants it secret? I mean come on .S
That's not so weird. How many times have you seen reporters disclose their sources? Hell, it's part of their code of conduct or whatever, they don't reveal their sources.
Lol he revealed the source, not saying what the reason was, making it even worse for Terencio. I call BS, like so many other news made up by that "reporter"
I'm not here to defend anyone, I don't know mmm and I barely know Terencio. But I'll say this: that argument is bullshit. You wanted to know more and thats understandable. But saying a piece of news is false because you don't understand everything is bullshit imo
Anonymous (14:48:48 - 06-01)
Leonard at 14:38:06 on 06/01:
That's not so weird. How many times have you seen reporters disclose their sources? Hell, it's part of their code of conduct or whatever, they don't reveal their sources.
Anonymous at 14:36:39 on 06/01:
I agree that it's weird though, reporter claiming to have talked to terencio and got the reason, but he wants it secret? I mean come on .S
Leonard at 14:31:54 on 06/01:
Yes, the Anonymous dude is probably a more reliable source of information
Anonymous at 14:28:10 on 06/01:
mmm, you come out with a lot of bullshit all the time
mmm at 14:27:10 on 06/01:
I asked him and got another story completely, so it's weird of you to throw it out here without anything that even looks like proof, great journalism right there :D
He tells me but didn't tell you... weird!
I asked him and got another story completely, so it's weird of you to throw it out here without anything that even looks like proof, great journalism right there :D
He tells me but didn't tell you... weird!
Yes, the Anonymous dude is probably a more reliable source of information
I agree that it's weird though, reporter claiming to have talked to terencio and got the reason, but he wants it secret? I mean come on .S
That's not so weird. How many times have you seen reporters disclose their sources? Hell, it's part of their code of conduct or whatever, they don't reveal their sources.
Lol he revealed the source, not saying what the reason was, making it even worse for Terencio. I call BS, like so many other news made up by that "reporter"
Leonard (14:48:07 - 06-01)
Anonymous at 14:41:38 on 06/01:
lol Leonard are paying attention? read back, he gives up his source but holds back the information. its the other way around. one hell of a journalist xd
Leonard at 14:38:06 on 06/01:
That's not so weird. How many times have you seen reporters disclose their sources? Hell, it's part of their code of conduct or whatever, they don't reveal their sources.
Anonymous at 14:36:39 on 06/01:
I agree that it's weird though, reporter claiming to have talked to terencio and got the reason, but he wants it secret? I mean come on .S
Leonard at 14:31:54 on 06/01:
Yes, the Anonymous dude is probably a more reliable source of information
Anonymous at 14:28:10 on 06/01:
mmm, you come out with a lot of bullshit all the time
mmm at 14:27:10 on 06/01:
I asked him and got another story completely, so it's weird of you to throw it out here without anything that even looks like proof, great journalism right there :D
He tells me but didn't tell you... weird!
I asked him and got another story completely, so it's weird of you to throw it out here without anything that even looks like proof, great journalism right there :D
He tells me but didn't tell you... weird!
Yes, the Anonymous dude is probably a more reliable source of information
I agree that it's weird though, reporter claiming to have talked to terencio and got the reason, but he wants it secret? I mean come on .S
That's not so weird. How many times have you seen reporters disclose their sources? Hell, it's part of their code of conduct or whatever, they don't reveal their sources.
lol Leonard are paying attention? read back, he gives up his source but holds back the information. its the other way around. one hell of a journalist xd
He also says the person involved (Terencio) doesn't want to make the information public, so why should mmm? Really I don't understand what your problem is. Someone got Akilled, thats the end of it. You want to know more? Me too, everyone wants to know shit. It's not public information? Too bad, try to find out like mmm did or be in the dark like everyone else :P
Redspeert (14:41:52 - 06-01)
Comments is comments, article is article.
Articles are to be kept neutral and based on facts, comments is the given person's personal opinion.
Articles are to be kept neutral and based on facts, comments is the given person's personal opinion.
Anonymous (14:41:38 - 06-01)
Leonard at 14:38:06 on 06/01:
That's not so weird. How many times have you seen reporters disclose their sources? Hell, it's part of their code of conduct or whatever, they don't reveal their sources.
Anonymous at 14:36:39 on 06/01:
I agree that it's weird though, reporter claiming to have talked to terencio and got the reason, but he wants it secret? I mean come on .S
Leonard at 14:31:54 on 06/01:
Yes, the Anonymous dude is probably a more reliable source of information
Anonymous at 14:28:10 on 06/01:
mmm, you come out with a lot of bullshit all the time
mmm at 14:27:10 on 06/01:
I asked him and got another story completely, so it's weird of you to throw it out here without anything that even looks like proof, great journalism right there :D
He tells me but didn't tell you... weird!
I asked him and got another story completely, so it's weird of you to throw it out here without anything that even looks like proof, great journalism right there :D
He tells me but didn't tell you... weird!
Yes, the Anonymous dude is probably a more reliable source of information
I agree that it's weird though, reporter claiming to have talked to terencio and got the reason, but he wants it secret? I mean come on .S
That's not so weird. How many times have you seen reporters disclose their sources? Hell, it's part of their code of conduct or whatever, they don't reveal their sources.
lol Leonard are paying attention? read back, he gives up his source but holds back the information. its the other way around. one hell of a journalist xd
Leonard (14:38:06 - 06-01)
Anonymous at 14:36:39 on 06/01:
I agree that it's weird though, reporter claiming to have talked to terencio and got the reason, but he wants it secret? I mean come on .S
Leonard at 14:31:54 on 06/01:
Yes, the Anonymous dude is probably a more reliable source of information
Anonymous at 14:28:10 on 06/01:
mmm, you come out with a lot of bullshit all the time
mmm at 14:27:10 on 06/01:
I asked him and got another story completely, so it's weird of you to throw it out here without anything that even looks like proof, great journalism right there :D
He tells me but didn't tell you... weird!
I asked him and got another story completely, so it's weird of you to throw it out here without anything that even looks like proof, great journalism right there :D
He tells me but didn't tell you... weird!
Yes, the Anonymous dude is probably a more reliable source of information
I agree that it's weird though, reporter claiming to have talked to terencio and got the reason, but he wants it secret? I mean come on .S
That's not so weird. How many times have you seen reporters disclose their sources? Hell, it's part of their code of conduct or whatever, they don't reveal their sources.
(10:54:08) <+PeterPanAirLines> who told u that?
(10:54:10) <!Bramble> and therfore shared the accounts
(10:54:12) <!Bramble> doesn't matter
(10:54:14) <+PeterPanAirLines> u look into my computer?
(10:54:19) <!Bramble> we found proof of you doing so
(10:54:24) <!Bramble> ah, so you think we can't see it
(10:54:26) <+PeterPanAirLines> u cant look into my computer
(10:54:31) <!Bramble> because I don't have access to your computer
(10:54:35) <!Bramble> I don't need access there
(10:54:42) <!Bramble> we have other ways now to find teamviewers
(10:54:51) <+PeterPanAirLines> so how u know i have teamviewer facebook skype or what the hell?
(10:55:02) <!Bramble> because we could see
(10:55:06) <+PeterPanAirLines> tell me wich are cuz in italy there is hard lawas about privacy
LOL, shes a magician or a big liar, ive heard cow sing and donkey play guitars, bramblerose told me that :)