» Menu
» OB/Site News
» Articles
» Barafranca News
No news found. Reset in progress?
 |
|
article
After a day full of rumours the streets of Omerta are filling up with gangsters from a large variety of families...
Word on the street was that Provenzano+ and their bloods Leviticus & Indelicato had hired detectives on Aeterna+ and vice versa.
Faffie, Gambino & Alcatraz are the first ones to pull their triggers and are targeting Indelicato.
Only moments later, Provenzano+ Krays and Legends open fire on Aeterna+. Five minutes later Aeterna's respone is visible on the statistics page.
Half an hour later we see a new wave of gangsters catching bullets.
More gangsters from Aeterna and Lusa, this time aided by Ferrante, are shooting at Provenzano & Hattrickelli.
Simultaneously Empire & Marazzino open fire on Ataraxia.
All this shooting has proven insufficient to make a serious dent in Aeterna+…. therefore Impact, Kurosawa & Gravano are pointing their tommies towards Aeterna as well.
To save their blood from being shot down, Lusa Empire and Ferrante again pick up their tommy guns, this time aiming towards Impact.
Kurosawa and Gravano continue to battle Aeterna+ to the break of dawn.
Word on the street was that Provenzano+ and their bloods Leviticus & Indelicato had hired detectives on Aeterna+ and vice versa.
Faffie, Gambino & Alcatraz are the first ones to pull their triggers and are targeting Indelicato.
Only moments later, Provenzano+ Krays and Legends open fire on Aeterna+. Five minutes later Aeterna's respone is visible on the statistics page.
Half an hour later we see a new wave of gangsters catching bullets.
More gangsters from Aeterna and Lusa, this time aided by Ferrante, are shooting at Provenzano & Hattrickelli.
Simultaneously Empire & Marazzino open fire on Ataraxia.
All this shooting has proven insufficient to make a serious dent in Aeterna+…. therefore Impact, Kurosawa & Gravano are pointing their tommies towards Aeterna as well.
To save their blood from being shot down, Lusa Empire and Ferrante again pick up their tommy guns, this time aiming towards Impact.
Kurosawa and Gravano continue to battle Aeterna+ to the break of dawn.
statements
Saros`away (Aeterna top): "Well that was amusing"
statistics
| War started on: 19:54:03 17-12-2013 | War ended on: 03:17:02 19-12-2013 |
| Bullet difference: -88,582,225 | War duration: 1d 7h 22m |
| Money difference: -$5,023,653,676 | Players died: 850 |
deaths
Dead Families:
Deaths per family:
|
|
0
Anonymous (17:03:36 - 18-12)
Anonymous at 16:50:50 on 18/12:
I think you are the naughtyboy here
http://com.trabot.net/famstats.php?show=61&compare=0
That was hours before the war vs Justice happened. (Check Xerano Ascension #13 not top10)
Lusa is at 8 and empire is at 7.
Ferrante dropped lut of top10 a couple of days before the war when Jannisary overtook them.
Johnx at 16:42:41 on 18/12:
Lusa, Empire and Ferrante wasn't top 10 before wars started to happen. There you go naughtyboy
Anonymous at 16:38:40 on 18/12:
Tell me which of your bloods weren't in top10 before the wars started?
From the families that died during the first wars only Anarchy (your blood) and Jannisary were in top10.
Besides Anarchy you had Faffie Marazinno Empire Ferrante Lusa as bloods. All regularly, if not premanently, top10 families before any war started.
So I ask again, what bloods of you weren't in top10?
Xerano at 15:48:51 on 18/12:
People can complain all you want about Aeterna blooding top10 fams only or whatever, but don't forget those fams became top10 fams after Jannisary/Ascenion/Anarchy were killed.
People can complain all you want about Aeterna blooding top10 fams only or whatever, but don't forget those fams became top10 fams after Jannisary/Ascenion/Anarchy were killed.
Tell me which of your bloods weren't in top10 before the wars started?
From the families that died during the first wars only Anarchy (your blood) and Jannisary were in top10.
Besides Anarchy you had Faffie Marazinno Empire Ferrante Lusa as bloods. All regularly, if not premanently, top10 families before any war started.
So I ask again, what bloods of you weren't in top10?
I think you are the naughtyboy here
http://com.trabot.net/famstats.php?show=61&compare=0
That was hours before the war vs Justice happened. (Check Xerano Ascension #13 not top10)
Lusa is at 8 and empire is at 7.
Ferrante dropped lut of top10 a couple of days before the war when Jannisary overtook them.
Are Trabot stats/points calculated the same as ingame? Honestly I never used the Trabot system so if you're basing everything of that I dont know how to respond since I have no knowledge of it.
Anonymous at 16:50:50 on 18/12:
I think you are the naughtyboy here
http://com.trabot.net/famstats.php?show=61&compare=0
That was hours before the war vs Justice happened. (Check Xerano Ascension #13 not top10)
Lusa is at 8 and empire is at 7.
Ferrante dropped lut of top10 a couple of days before the war when Jannisary overtook them.
Johnx at 16:42:41 on 18/12:
Lusa, Empire and Ferrante wasn't top 10 before wars started to happen. There you go naughtyboy
Anonymous at 16:38:40 on 18/12:
Tell me which of your bloods weren't in top10 before the wars started?
From the families that died during the first wars only Anarchy (your blood) and Jannisary were in top10.
Besides Anarchy you had Faffie Marazinno Empire Ferrante Lusa as bloods. All regularly, if not premanently, top10 families before any war started.
So I ask again, what bloods of you weren't in top10?
Xerano at 15:48:51 on 18/12:
People can complain all you want about Aeterna blooding top10 fams only or whatever, but don't forget those fams became top10 fams after Jannisary/Ascenion/Anarchy were killed.
People can complain all you want about Aeterna blooding top10 fams only or whatever, but don't forget those fams became top10 fams after Jannisary/Ascenion/Anarchy were killed.
Tell me which of your bloods weren't in top10 before the wars started?
From the families that died during the first wars only Anarchy (your blood) and Jannisary were in top10.
Besides Anarchy you had Faffie Marazinno Empire Ferrante Lusa as bloods. All regularly, if not premanently, top10 families before any war started.
So I ask again, what bloods of you weren't in top10?
I think you are the naughtyboy here
http://com.trabot.net/famstats.php?show=61&compare=0
That was hours before the war vs Justice happened. (Check Xerano Ascension #13 not top10)
Lusa is at 8 and empire is at 7.
Ferrante dropped lut of top10 a couple of days before the war when Jannisary overtook them.
* hits the watch
check, your turn
Anonymous (16:54:55 - 18-12)
Maraz+ shooting faffie+ tonight, reset friday?
Anonymous (16:50:50 - 18-12)
Johnx at 16:42:41 on 18/12:
Lusa, Empire and Ferrante wasn't top 10 before wars started to happen. There you go naughtyboy
Anonymous at 16:38:40 on 18/12:
Tell me which of your bloods weren't in top10 before the wars started?
From the families that died during the first wars only Anarchy (your blood) and Jannisary were in top10.
Besides Anarchy you had Faffie Marazinno Empire Ferrante Lusa as bloods. All regularly, if not premanently, top10 families before any war started.
So I ask again, what bloods of you weren't in top10?
Xerano at 15:48:51 on 18/12:
People can complain all you want about Aeterna blooding top10 fams only or whatever, but don't forget those fams became top10 fams after Jannisary/Ascenion/Anarchy were killed.
People can complain all you want about Aeterna blooding top10 fams only or whatever, but don't forget those fams became top10 fams after Jannisary/Ascenion/Anarchy were killed.
Tell me which of your bloods weren't in top10 before the wars started?
From the families that died during the first wars only Anarchy (your blood) and Jannisary were in top10.
Besides Anarchy you had Faffie Marazinno Empire Ferrante Lusa as bloods. All regularly, if not premanently, top10 families before any war started.
So I ask again, what bloods of you weren't in top10?
I think you are the naughtyboy here
http://com.trabot.net/famstats.php?show=61&compare=0
That was hours before the war vs Justice happened. (Check Xerano Ascension #13 not top10)
Lusa is at 8 and empire is at 7.
Ferrante dropped lut of top10 a couple of days before the war when Jannisary overtook them.
Anonymous (16:50:26 - 18-12)
Aart at 14:47:59 on 18/12:
since this is the 3rd time you've been posting anonymous today.... here, have your answer so you can stop crying.
with prov+ levi/DIG & grav+ working together on clearing Aeterna+ you think our bloods left us much of a choice?
What you're basically saying is that if 3 out of the 10 families (bloods) shoot 1 other blood you should automatically choose for the side with the overhand on bloods?
With the blood connections from krays levi and dig (impact/gravano/prov) we wouldn't have lasted two days longer ourselves, so do not pull the irresponsible blood card on us you stupid shit.
And if you really wanne get into details about this, feel free to pm any of us on irc, cause i'd like to know who i'm talking with.
Anonymous at 14:00:04 on 18/12:
Also, where i get suprised is the fact that 3 of Empire bloods were shot in war, they simply don't care about them and go shooting Provenzano, while Leviticus and Indelicato getting shot, just to asslick Aeterna. Silly guys are Aart and Redvendetta... :')
Though, funny war, funny people, funny game at all.
!next version.
Also, where i get suprised is the fact that 3 of Empire bloods were shot in war, they simply don't care about them and go shooting Provenzano, while Leviticus and Indelicato getting shot, just to asslick Aeterna. Silly guys are Aart and Redvendetta... :')
Though, funny war, funny people, funny game at all.
!next version.
since this is the 3rd time you've been posting anonymous today.... here, have your answer so you can stop crying.
with prov+ levi/DIG & grav+ working together on clearing Aeterna+ you think our bloods left us much of a choice?
What you're basically saying is that if 3 out of the 10 families (bloods) shoot 1 other blood you should automatically choose for the side with the overhand on bloods?
With the blood connections from krays levi and dig (impact/gravano/prov) we wouldn't have lasted two days longer ourselves, so do not pull the irresponsible blood card on us you stupid shit.
And if you really wanne get into details about this, feel free to pm any of us on irc, cause i'd like to know who i'm talking with.
!done. As soon as u tell the truth, then i will maybe show my real name, till then ":*".
Anonymous at 16:38:40 on 18/12:
Tell me which of your bloods weren't in top10 before the wars started?
From the families that died during the first wars only Anarchy (your blood) and Jannisary were in top10.
Besides Anarchy you had Faffie Marazinno Empire Ferrante Lusa as bloods. All regularly, if not premanently, top10 families before any war started.
So I ask again, what bloods of you weren't in top10?
Xerano at 15:48:51 on 18/12:
People can complain all you want about Aeterna blooding top10 fams only or whatever, but don't forget those fams became top10 fams after Jannisary/Ascenion/Anarchy were killed.
People can complain all you want about Aeterna blooding top10 fams only or whatever, but don't forget those fams became top10 fams after Jannisary/Ascenion/Anarchy were killed.
Tell me which of your bloods weren't in top10 before the wars started?
From the families that died during the first wars only Anarchy (your blood) and Jannisary were in top10.
Besides Anarchy you had Faffie Marazinno Empire Ferrante Lusa as bloods. All regularly, if not premanently, top10 families before any war started.
So I ask again, what bloods of you weren't in top10?
That's incorrect, Ascension was #10 so that's still top10. When we blooded Ferrante they were 13-15ish. They only became top10 after Janni/Ascension and Anarchy died. Others I dont really remember but Faffie/Maraz atleast were always in top 10. I never claimed all of them were outside of the top10 when we blooded them, if I did that that would be stupid as everyone could see that wasnt true.
Anonymous at 16:38:40 on 18/12:
Tell me which of your bloods weren't in top10 before the wars started?
From the families that died during the first wars only Anarchy (your blood) and Jannisary were in top10.
Besides Anarchy you had Faffie Marazinno Empire Ferrante Lusa as bloods. All regularly, if not premanently, top10 families before any war started.
So I ask again, what bloods of you weren't in top10?
Xerano at 15:48:51 on 18/12:
People can complain all you want about Aeterna blooding top10 fams only or whatever, but don't forget those fams became top10 fams after Jannisary/Ascenion/Anarchy were killed.
People can complain all you want about Aeterna blooding top10 fams only or whatever, but don't forget those fams became top10 fams after Jannisary/Ascenion/Anarchy were killed.
Tell me which of your bloods weren't in top10 before the wars started?
From the families that died during the first wars only Anarchy (your blood) and Jannisary were in top10.
Besides Anarchy you had Faffie Marazinno Empire Ferrante Lusa as bloods. All regularly, if not premanently, top10 families before any war started.
So I ask again, what bloods of you weren't in top10?
Anonymous (16:38:40 - 18-12)
Xerano at 15:48:51 on 18/12:
People can complain all you want about Aeterna blooding top10 fams only or whatever, but don't forget those fams became top10 fams after Jannisary/Ascenion/Anarchy were killed.
People can complain all you want about Aeterna blooding top10 fams only or whatever, but don't forget those fams became top10 fams after Jannisary/Ascenion/Anarchy were killed.
Tell me which of your bloods weren't in top10 before the wars started?
From the families that died during the first wars only Anarchy (your blood) and Jannisary were in top10.
Besides Anarchy you had Faffie Marazinno Empire Ferrante Lusa as bloods. All regularly, if not premanently, top10 families before any war started.
So I ask again, what bloods of you weren't in top10?
Johnny at 16:01:42 on 18/12:
I completely agree with your 1st point. People here take everything too personal (hell I was same when I played), but yes that is biggest problem. People need to be able to kill and die without taking it personal, people need to understand that just cause someone shot with you in last 2 wars doesn't have to be your bff for the rest of the game. However I agree this is wishful thinking and that these things are very unlikely to change.
I was on both sides in these situations, part of huge groups and target of large groups, and I completely agree that all families need to be on the same page with this, cause it takes only 1 group and 1 bigger fam to stop this from happening. Families need to be run with desire to enjoy game and have fun playing, instead of run by fear and desire to ''pwn'' everyone else by any cost.
I actually think if families (and I mean all of em) would try this, ''new'' way of playing instead of standard lets blood till we drop, they would have more fun shooting in much more open wars. Dying and reranking would be very viable option, and it could keep game flow going on for much longer than month or two. Of course all this would ask for admin help in all of this, providing good KA and healthy game environment.
Actually I'm really happy that tops from leading fams see this as more interesting way to play game.
Xerano at 15:48:51 on 18/12:
Eventhough I agree that it sounds like something that could be more interesting it's just wishful thinking. The problem lies in people clinging onto the connections they've made over the years, even when they dont blood a fam they refuse to shoot them because they're old friends. In the meantime they're also creating new connections. The other thing that never changes aswell is the 'hate' for certain families. If you have shot someone in 2.X they still use that as a reason to shoot you.
Families have tried to drop the amount of bloods to 3-4 but on the other hand others increase it to 8-9 (Or just add an alliance to their bloodlist while being an alliance themselves like Justice/ASA). This only results in the fam with the least amount of bloods to get gangbanged on in the first war. Being on the receiving end for versions in a row is quite frustrating so obviously you'll explore other ways. People can complain all you want about Aeterna blooding top10 fams only or whatever, but don't forget those fams became top10 fams after Jannisary/Ascenion/Anarchy were killed. .
Eventhough I agree that it sounds like something that could be more interesting it's just wishful thinking. The problem lies in people clinging onto the connections they've made over the years, even when they dont blood a fam they refuse to shoot them because they're old friends. In the meantime they're also creating new connections. The other thing that never changes aswell is the 'hate' for certain families. If you have shot someone in 2.X they still use that as a reason to shoot you.
Families have tried to drop the amount of bloods to 3-4 but on the other hand others increase it to 8-9 (Or just add an alliance to their bloodlist while being an alliance themselves like Justice/ASA). This only results in the fam with the least amount of bloods to get gangbanged on in the first war. Being on the receiving end for versions in a row is quite frustrating so obviously you'll explore other ways. People can complain all you want about Aeterna blooding top10 fams only or whatever, but don't forget those fams became top10 fams after Jannisary/Ascenion/Anarchy were killed. .
I completely agree with your 1st point. People here take everything too personal (hell I was same when I played), but yes that is biggest problem. People need to be able to kill and die without taking it personal, people need to understand that just cause someone shot with you in last 2 wars doesn't have to be your bff for the rest of the game. However I agree this is wishful thinking and that these things are very unlikely to change.
I was on both sides in these situations, part of huge groups and target of large groups, and I completely agree that all families need to be on the same page with this, cause it takes only 1 group and 1 bigger fam to stop this from happening. Families need to be run with desire to enjoy game and have fun playing, instead of run by fear and desire to ''pwn'' everyone else by any cost.
I actually think if families (and I mean all of em) would try this, ''new'' way of playing instead of standard lets blood till we drop, they would have more fun shooting in much more open wars. Dying and reranking would be very viable option, and it could keep game flow going on for much longer than month or two. Of course all this would ask for admin help in all of this, providing good KA and healthy game environment.
Actually I'm really happy that tops from leading fams see this as more interesting way to play game.
To make it work there also needs to be a change from crewside though, they made a change that the longer you are in a family the stronger you are. Obviously this means rebirth accounts are at a disadvantage. Also the fact that KS has a huge influence in account strength, so the more wars you do the stronger you get. Unfortunately most people don't even realize this and when they massively die in BF of those with KS they just call them cheaters. You'd think after dying in BF over and over again to people who have KS it might actually be true that KS makes a difference... anyhow as there's no 'easy' way to gain KS as a rebirthed account they made re-ranking kind of... useless. That's also a cause for shorter versions.
Anonymous (16:14:06 - 18-12)
Johnny at 16:01:42 on 18/12:
I completely agree with your 1st point. People here take everything too personal (hell I was same when I played), but yes that is biggest problem. People need to be able to kill and die without taking it personal, people need to understand that just cause someone shot with you in last 2 wars doesn't have to be your bff for the rest of the game. However I agree this is wishful thinking and that these things are very unlikely to change.
I was on both sides in these situations, part of huge groups and target of large groups, and I completely agree that all families need to be on the same page with this, cause it takes only 1 group and 1 bigger fam to stop this from happening. Families need to be run with desire to enjoy game and have fun playing, instead of run by fear and desire to ''pwn'' everyone else by any cost.
I actually think if families (and I mean all of em) would try this, ''new'' way of playing instead of standard lets blood till we drop, they would have more fun shooting in much more open wars. Dying and reranking would be very viable option, and it could keep game flow going on for much longer than month or two. Of course all this would ask for admin help in all of this, providing good KA and healthy game environment.
Actually I'm really happy that tops from leading fams see this as more interesting way to play game.
Xerano at 15:48:51 on 18/12:
Eventhough I agree that it sounds like something that could be more interesting it's just wishful thinking. The problem lies in people clinging onto the connections they've made over the years, even when they dont blood a fam they refuse to shoot them because they're old friends. In the meantime they're also creating new connections. The other thing that never changes aswell is the 'hate' for certain families. If you have shot someone in 2.X they still use that as a reason to shoot you.
Families have tried to drop the amount of bloods to 3-4 but on the other hand others increase it to 8-9 (Or just add an alliance to their bloodlist while being an alliance themselves like Justice/ASA). This only results in the fam with the least amount of bloods to get gangbanged on in the first war. Being on the receiving end for versions in a row is quite frustrating so obviously you'll explore other ways. People can complain all you want about Aeterna blooding top10 fams only or whatever, but don't forget those fams became top10 fams after Jannisary/Ascenion/Anarchy were killed. .
Eventhough I agree that it sounds like something that could be more interesting it's just wishful thinking. The problem lies in people clinging onto the connections they've made over the years, even when they dont blood a fam they refuse to shoot them because they're old friends. In the meantime they're also creating new connections. The other thing that never changes aswell is the 'hate' for certain families. If you have shot someone in 2.X they still use that as a reason to shoot you.
Families have tried to drop the amount of bloods to 3-4 but on the other hand others increase it to 8-9 (Or just add an alliance to their bloodlist while being an alliance themselves like Justice/ASA). This only results in the fam with the least amount of bloods to get gangbanged on in the first war. Being on the receiving end for versions in a row is quite frustrating so obviously you'll explore other ways. People can complain all you want about Aeterna blooding top10 fams only or whatever, but don't forget those fams became top10 fams after Jannisary/Ascenion/Anarchy were killed. .
I completely agree with your 1st point. People here take everything too personal (hell I was same when I played), but yes that is biggest problem. People need to be able to kill and die without taking it personal, people need to understand that just cause someone shot with you in last 2 wars doesn't have to be your bff for the rest of the game. However I agree this is wishful thinking and that these things are very unlikely to change.
I was on both sides in these situations, part of huge groups and target of large groups, and I completely agree that all families need to be on the same page with this, cause it takes only 1 group and 1 bigger fam to stop this from happening. Families need to be run with desire to enjoy game and have fun playing, instead of run by fear and desire to ''pwn'' everyone else by any cost.
I actually think if families (and I mean all of em) would try this, ''new'' way of playing instead of standard lets blood till we drop, they would have more fun shooting in much more open wars. Dying and reranking would be very viable option, and it could keep game flow going on for much longer than month or two. Of course all this would ask for admin help in all of this, providing good KA and healthy game environment.
Actually I'm really happy that tops from leading fams see this as more interesting way to play game.
Could you name those tops?
So we can actually judge them later by their actual blooding behaviour and not what they want to do? Talk is cheap afterall.
Xerano at 15:48:51 on 18/12:
Eventhough I agree that it sounds like something that could be more interesting it's just wishful thinking. The problem lies in people clinging onto the connections they've made over the years, even when they dont blood a fam they refuse to shoot them because they're old friends. In the meantime they're also creating new connections. The other thing that never changes aswell is the 'hate' for certain families. If you have shot someone in 2.X they still use that as a reason to shoot you.
Families have tried to drop the amount of bloods to 3-4 but on the other hand others increase it to 8-9 (Or just add an alliance to their bloodlist while being an alliance themselves like Justice/ASA). This only results in the fam with the least amount of bloods to get gangbanged on in the first war. Being on the receiving end for versions in a row is quite frustrating so obviously you'll explore other ways. People can complain all you want about Aeterna blooding top10 fams only or whatever, but don't forget those fams became top10 fams after Jannisary/Ascenion/Anarchy were killed. .
Eventhough I agree that it sounds like something that could be more interesting it's just wishful thinking. The problem lies in people clinging onto the connections they've made over the years, even when they dont blood a fam they refuse to shoot them because they're old friends. In the meantime they're also creating new connections. The other thing that never changes aswell is the 'hate' for certain families. If you have shot someone in 2.X they still use that as a reason to shoot you.
Families have tried to drop the amount of bloods to 3-4 but on the other hand others increase it to 8-9 (Or just add an alliance to their bloodlist while being an alliance themselves like Justice/ASA). This only results in the fam with the least amount of bloods to get gangbanged on in the first war. Being on the receiving end for versions in a row is quite frustrating so obviously you'll explore other ways. People can complain all you want about Aeterna blooding top10 fams only or whatever, but don't forget those fams became top10 fams after Jannisary/Ascenion/Anarchy were killed. .
I completely agree with your 1st point. People here take everything too personal (hell I was same when I played), but yes that is biggest problem. People need to be able to kill and die without taking it personal, people need to understand that just cause someone shot with you in last 2 wars doesn't have to be your bff for the rest of the game. However I agree this is wishful thinking and that these things are very unlikely to change.
I was on both sides in these situations, part of huge groups and target of large groups, and I completely agree that all families need to be on the same page with this, cause it takes only 1 group and 1 bigger fam to stop this from happening. Families need to be run with desire to enjoy game and have fun playing, instead of run by fear and desire to ''pwn'' everyone else by any cost.
I actually think if families (and I mean all of em) would try this, ''new'' way of playing instead of standard lets blood till we drop, they would have more fun shooting in much more open wars. Dying and reranking would be very viable option, and it could keep game flow going on for much longer than month or two. Of course all this would ask for admin help in all of this, providing good KA and healthy game environment.
Actually I'm really happy that tops from leading fams see this as more interesting way to play game.
Johnny at 15:13:12 on 18/12:
With what I wrote I didn't mean Aeterna only. I meant on every single family in game. Imagine if Marazzino, Aeterna, Faffie, Gravano, Provenzano (without making alliance) etc. would blood 2 or 3 fams, and that these fams instead of working together to crush others work for themselves and try to win version alone.
Anonymous at 15:06:24 on 18/12:
I don't completely agree. 3 versions ago vaffancullo left the gravano pact and won the version with 4 families.
This version aeterna didn't join a pact and blooded 5 fams that are all completely unrelated. You can argue about whether or not they should've blooded maraz and faffie but the reason why they have to was shown in this war. The prov pact that was their size + dig+ Levi + faffie attacks them. When they fail they get another 100 brugs against them from the gravano / impact / Kurosawa pact.
You can say whatever you want but you can't defend yourself from that by blooding just larocca or gambino sized families. I'm glad there are still families alive that have a top that bloods unrelated families. Its a good step in the right direction.
Same goes for Faffie, they seem to be quite done with gravanos selfishness and pactplay
I don't completely agree. 3 versions ago vaffancullo left the gravano pact and won the version with 4 families.
This version aeterna didn't join a pact and blooded 5 fams that are all completely unrelated. You can argue about whether or not they should've blooded maraz and faffie but the reason why they have to was shown in this war. The prov pact that was their size + dig+ Levi + faffie attacks them. When they fail they get another 100 brugs against them from the gravano / impact / Kurosawa pact.
You can say whatever you want but you can't defend yourself from that by blooding just larocca or gambino sized families. I'm glad there are still families alive that have a top that bloods unrelated families. Its a good step in the right direction.
Same goes for Faffie, they seem to be quite done with gravanos selfishness and pactplay
With what I wrote I didn't mean Aeterna only. I meant on every single family in game. Imagine if Marazzino, Aeterna, Faffie, Gravano, Provenzano (without making alliance) etc. would blood 2 or 3 fams, and that these fams instead of working together to crush others work for themselves and try to win version alone.
Eventhough I agree that it sounds like something that could be more interesting it's just wishful thinking. The problem lies in people clinging onto the connections they've made over the years, even when they dont blood a fam they refuse to shoot them because they're old friends. In the meantime they're also creating new connections. The other thing that never changes aswell is the 'hate' for certain families. If you have shot someone in 2.X they still use that as a reason to shoot you.
Families have tried to drop the amount of bloods to 3-4 but on the other hand others increase it to 8-9 (Or just add an alliance to their bloodlist while being an alliance themselves like Justice/ASA). This only results in the fam with the least amount of bloods to get gangbanged on in the first war. Being on the receiving end for versions in a row is quite frustrating so obviously you'll explore other ways. People can complain all you want about Aeterna blooding top10 fams only or whatever, but don't forget those fams became top10 fams after Jannisary/Ascenion/Anarchy were killed.
Either way the war was fun, didnt expect us to make it out alive so thanks to all our members and bloods for helping out on surviving this one.
Anonymous at 15:34:12 on 18/12:
Well.. Aeterna made first move by not joining a pact. Those others you named have to get out of their pacts first. Would be awkward to AND leave pacts behind you AND only blood 2 fams while others are still in their pating phase
Well.. Aeterna made first move by not joining a pact. Those others you named have to get out of their pacts first. Would be awkward to AND leave pacts behind you AND only blood 2 fams while others are still in their pating phase
I have no clue who you are, my guess is either some top or high member of some family, but if you think what Aeterna did is move in right direction then my whole post is pointless. If you think that #1 family that's twice size of 2nd family and makes as 1 with family that is also in top 10, then bloods #2 and #3 proceeding to blood 3 more fams in top 10 (or very close to it) is right direction for this game to go then future of this isn't long lasting.
Anonymous (15:42:55 - 18-12)
Anonymous at 13:53:06 on 18/12:
+1
+1
Anonymous at 13:35:35 on 18/12:
Versions keep getting shorter and shorter, there are only a fraction of the players left to what there used to be versions ago :-( I remember times when fams hat to make sister families in order to get their 700 members under the family roof, now when a fam has 100+ members they are already big, wtf???
Just look at the users online list, 230 people online, it used to be like 4000+. Devs are only thinking about making money, and letting this game die out in the process.
The Devs really need to start getting new players to join up or Omerta is doomed...
Versions keep getting shorter and shorter, there are only a fraction of the players left to what there used to be versions ago :-( I remember times when fams hat to make sister families in order to get their 700 members under the family roof, now when a fam has 100+ members they are already big, wtf???
Just look at the users online list, 230 people online, it used to be like 4000+. Devs are only thinking about making money, and letting this game die out in the process.
The Devs really need to start getting new players to join up or Omerta is doomed...
+1
Anonymous at 13:35:35 on 18/12:
Versions keep getting shorter and shorter, there are only a fraction of the players left to what there used to be versions ago :-( I remember times when fams hat to make sister families in order to get their 700 members under the family roof, now when a fam has 100+ members they are already big, wtf???
Just look at the users online list, 230 people online, it used to be like 4000+. Devs are only thinking about making money, and letting this game die out in the process.
The Devs really need to start getting new players to join up or Omerta is doomed...
Versions keep getting shorter and shorter, there are only a fraction of the players left to what there used to be versions ago :-( I remember times when fams hat to make sister families in order to get their 700 members under the family roof, now when a fam has 100+ members they are already big, wtf???
Just look at the users online list, 230 people online, it used to be like 4000+. Devs are only thinking about making money, and letting this game die out in the process.
The Devs really need to start getting new players to join up or Omerta is doomed...
+1
New players won't help. Because:
a) they join one of those big gay alliances, thus making them bigger.
b) they join some noob fam with noob tops (no, I don't mean moondark), that get killed early on for KS farming or for an object
a) they add to the problem and do not solve it
b) they leave again rather quick or join a big gay alliance next version.
Top have the power to change the game, but they don't want to. They want to form big gay alliances. For more details see Johnny's post. Which is spot on.
People of America. I present to you: "Genitals.. In the Sky"
Just putting that out there.
Just putting that out there.
Anonymous (15:38:31 - 18-12)
Anonymous at 15:11:57 on 18/12:
Did you do the math..how many brugs jumped in for aeterna...you all talk about aeterna pwning their attackers..but in fact they had another 150 brugs, on top of their 100 brugs, who helped them..so basicly it was a suicide for levi dig prove and the rest...cos they were heavily outnumbered, and by reading the posts maraz was planning a war on faffie while levi dig and prove were planning on aeterna...so maraz played both sides and in the end choose the winning...
Anonymous at 15:06:24 on 18/12:
I don't completely agree. 3 versions ago vaffancullo left the gravano pact and won the version with 4 families.
This version aeterna didn't join a pact and blooded 5 fams that are all completely unrelated. You can argue about whether or not they should've blooded maraz and faffie but the reason why they have to was shown in this war. The prov pact that was their size + dig+ Levi + faffie attacks them. When they fail they get another 100 brugs against them from the gravano / impact / Kurosawa pact.
You can say whatever you want but you can't defend yourself from that by blooding just larocca or gambino sized families. I'm glad there are still families alive that have a top that bloods unrelated families. Its a good step in the right direction.
Same goes for Faffie, they seem to be quite done with gravanos selfishness and pactplay
Johnny at 14:50:47 on 18/12:
When I made account this version I really didn't expect game to be worse than when I left, turns out I was quite wrong. Now I wont talk about different styles of different families because that's pointless, everything does what they think is best for them. However there are things that need to be said:
Bloodings, as they're done these days are complete joke. Current number of bloods could work in 2.x or early 3.x versions but with this number of ''active'' players and families, having anything more than 4 bloods is too much. Not to mention amount of as 1 or alliances. While game kept shrinking and player base kept getting smaller blood lists remained same as they were before. Most top families, most big families, don't even consider blooding less amount of fams to keep game open. That is what leads to game being over after 1 big war.
At this point it's not even admins fault game is in this condition (granted admins aren't helping it at all, and they did their fair share in ruining game), it's tops of each family that are unwilling to risk dying or being weaker with mixing things up and trying to keep game ''healthy'' as possible.
This game, in this condition and with this number of players is not ready for megalomaniac families or alliances. If anyone of those players or tops really cares about game they should stop for a second and think what are they doing. Will blooding 6 big fams and ending version within a week really matter? And every single family matters, if you want a change, be change yourself. Don't look on others and say well they blooded so many so I have to as well. If you want to make game more enjoyable for everyone, don't look how to survive and be safe, look how to play RPG game.
Omerta in past had numbers and players to bring dozens of big alliances and have dozen of big wars and keep game open and make it possible for everyone to play, shoot and die, win and lose wars but never before condition of game was this bad. Maybe it's sign of dying game and probably nothing will change, nor will my rant here matter. I just know I had more fun winning and losing wars and versions where I knew there's more into game than 1 war.
In the end I should congratulate Aeterna for winning this version, you guys deserved it and there's no question about that.
When I made account this version I really didn't expect game to be worse than when I left, turns out I was quite wrong. Now I wont talk about different styles of different families because that's pointless, everything does what they think is best for them. However there are things that need to be said:
Bloodings, as they're done these days are complete joke. Current number of bloods could work in 2.x or early 3.x versions but with this number of ''active'' players and families, having anything more than 4 bloods is too much. Not to mention amount of as 1 or alliances. While game kept shrinking and player base kept getting smaller blood lists remained same as they were before. Most top families, most big families, don't even consider blooding less amount of fams to keep game open. That is what leads to game being over after 1 big war.
At this point it's not even admins fault game is in this condition (granted admins aren't helping it at all, and they did their fair share in ruining game), it's tops of each family that are unwilling to risk dying or being weaker with mixing things up and trying to keep game ''healthy'' as possible.
This game, in this condition and with this number of players is not ready for megalomaniac families or alliances. If anyone of those players or tops really cares about game they should stop for a second and think what are they doing. Will blooding 6 big fams and ending version within a week really matter? And every single family matters, if you want a change, be change yourself. Don't look on others and say well they blooded so many so I have to as well. If you want to make game more enjoyable for everyone, don't look how to survive and be safe, look how to play RPG game.
Omerta in past had numbers and players to bring dozens of big alliances and have dozen of big wars and keep game open and make it possible for everyone to play, shoot and die, win and lose wars but never before condition of game was this bad. Maybe it's sign of dying game and probably nothing will change, nor will my rant here matter. I just know I had more fun winning and losing wars and versions where I knew there's more into game than 1 war.
In the end I should congratulate Aeterna for winning this version, you guys deserved it and there's no question about that.
I don't completely agree. 3 versions ago vaffancullo left the gravano pact and won the version with 4 families.
This version aeterna didn't join a pact and blooded 5 fams that are all completely unrelated. You can argue about whether or not they should've blooded maraz and faffie but the reason why they have to was shown in this war. The prov pact that was their size + dig+ Levi + faffie attacks them. When they fail they get another 100 brugs against them from the gravano / impact / Kurosawa pact.
You can say whatever you want but you can't defend yourself from that by blooding just larocca or gambino sized families. I'm glad there are still families alive that have a top that bloods unrelated families. Its a good step in the right direction.
Same goes for Faffie, they seem to be quite done with gravanos selfishness and pactplay
Did you do the math..how many brugs jumped in for aeterna...you all talk about aeterna pwning their attackers..but in fact they had another 150 brugs, on top of their 100 brugs, who helped them..so basicly it was a suicide for levi dig prove and the rest...cos they were heavily outnumbered, and by reading the posts maraz was planning a war on faffie while levi dig and prove were planning on aeterna...so maraz played both sides and in the end choose the winning...
Exactly my point. Look at the dead attackers about 250 are dead and still some alive makes about 275. Shows if you get all your non related bloods in a war against pacts, you can do about a 1:1 ratio. If one of your non related bloods had a strong connection with the pact you shoot against odds. So their blooding makes sense.
Anonymous (15:34:12 - 18-12)
Johnny at 15:13:12 on 18/12:
With what I wrote I didn't mean Aeterna only. I meant on every single family in game. Imagine if Marazzino, Aeterna, Faffie, Gravano, Provenzano (without making alliance) etc. would blood 2 or 3 fams, and that these fams instead of working together to crush others work for themselves and try to win version alone.
Anonymous at 15:06:24 on 18/12:
I don't completely agree. 3 versions ago vaffancullo left the gravano pact and won the version with 4 families.
This version aeterna didn't join a pact and blooded 5 fams that are all completely unrelated. You can argue about whether or not they should've blooded maraz and faffie but the reason why they have to was shown in this war. The prov pact that was their size + dig+ Levi + faffie attacks them. When they fail they get another 100 brugs against them from the gravano / impact / Kurosawa pact.
You can say whatever you want but you can't defend yourself from that by blooding just larocca or gambino sized families. I'm glad there are still families alive that have a top that bloods unrelated families. Its a good step in the right direction.
Same goes for Faffie, they seem to be quite done with gravanos selfishness and pactplay
I don't completely agree. 3 versions ago vaffancullo left the gravano pact and won the version with 4 families.
This version aeterna didn't join a pact and blooded 5 fams that are all completely unrelated. You can argue about whether or not they should've blooded maraz and faffie but the reason why they have to was shown in this war. The prov pact that was their size + dig+ Levi + faffie attacks them. When they fail they get another 100 brugs against them from the gravano / impact / Kurosawa pact.
You can say whatever you want but you can't defend yourself from that by blooding just larocca or gambino sized families. I'm glad there are still families alive that have a top that bloods unrelated families. Its a good step in the right direction.
Same goes for Faffie, they seem to be quite done with gravanos selfishness and pactplay
With what I wrote I didn't mean Aeterna only. I meant on every single family in game. Imagine if Marazzino, Aeterna, Faffie, Gravano, Provenzano (without making alliance) etc. would blood 2 or 3 fams, and that these fams instead of working together to crush others work for themselves and try to win version alone.
Well.. Aeterna made first move by not joining a pact. Those others you named have to get out of their pacts first. Would be awkward to AND leave pacts behind you AND only blood 2 fams while others are still in their pating phase
Anonymous (15:31:50 - 18-12)
The reason aeterna blooded faffie/anarchy/maraz was they were families who can organise aganist them a good war as they did in past, ferrante happened with vincitori connection due to old days and empire was righelli connection
Maraz+ shooting faffie+ tonight, reset friday?
your dream senario ?