» Menu
» OB/Site News
» Articles
» Barafranca News
No news found. Reset in progress?
 |
|
article
General Comments & Major Rumors section.
Everyone knows where this section is for, keep it clean from flaming and only posts in english are allowed.
Everyone knows where this section is for, keep it clean from flaming and only posts in english are allowed.
Anonymous (09:46:36 - 15-01)
Anonymous (00:18:01 - 15-01)
Percentage online: 100%
Days online: 2D 12H 15M
yea.. wonder if we gonna see any Akills on the 100% obvious cheats.. probably not but it would be a nice change compared to last vers
Days online: 2D 12H 15M
yea.. wonder if we gonna see any Akills on the 100% obvious cheats.. probably not but it would be a nice change compared to last vers
Anonymous (00:12:18 - 15-01)
Anonymous at 23:19:54 on 14/01:
licavoli anyone know who were the tops?
licavoli anyone know who were the tops?
Anonymous (23:19:54 - 14-01)
licavoli anyone know who were the tops?
Anonymous (20:28:09 - 14-01)
Anonymous at 06:29:15 on 14/01:
bullshit
Anonymous at 21:46:34 on 13/01:
Users Alive: 1,591
Quite shite. V5 is pretty nice but mass pacting makes more and more people to leave.
I made a ticket with a suggestion about the mass pacting issue last round but admin never cared to reply, I don't even know if they read the ticket. Thought I would let you guys know what I wrote and see what you all think about my idea.
I think they need to shame the mass blooders. Perhaps that would make a few tops think twice before joing in on a big pact and instead try to play for themselves.
Many tops are now chasing a golden star like they are worth a ton of gold. So one way to shame them is to give out shame stars instead of golden stars. A shame star could be a red star, or any other symbol or color, and when you put the mouse pointer on it a box would show where it reads "I'm a covard v5.2", like it does with the golden stars where it says "Top ranker" or whatever the reason for the star is.
The gold star can be turned on and off but this star would always be visible, no way to turn it off. Perhaps if they win a fair round the shame star could be replaced by a golden star, but that would be the only way.
It is obviously hard to make exact rules for when a shame star is to be handed out instead of a gold star. So I belive admins would have to judge every round specificly and then decide what to do. There would be some guidelines but no exact rules. I know a lot of players feel the admins are crooked but every player can see when shame stars are needed so if the admins wouldn't hand them out it would be too obvious they are dirty (if they are will say) so I don't think that would be a big problem.
E.g. last round everybody, except perhaps the top of Winter and their dogs, can agree that shame stars would have been appropriate instead of golden stars. Don, sotto and consi of all the families would all have gotten a shame star and only one with a golden star would be top buster. That means top three of Winterhill, Summerhill, Infezione, Prestige, Motisi, Pentagram, Pentahouse, Mit, Jitem, Krays and probably a few more that I have forgot would have gotten a red shame star, more than 30 players would be shown as pussies to everyone.
I know there are ways to get around this but it would be a start at least. Something needs to be done. When players don't care to change the admins gotta try and change them.
Just my two cents, feel free to comment with your own thoughts.
Users Alive: 1,591
Quite shite. V5 is pretty nice but mass pacting makes more and more people to leave.
I made a ticket with a suggestion about the mass pacting issue last round but admin never cared to reply, I don't even know if they read the ticket. Thought I would let you guys know what I wrote and see what you all think about my idea.
I think they need to shame the mass blooders. Perhaps that would make a few tops think twice before joing in on a big pact and instead try to play for themselves.
Many tops are now chasing a golden star like they are worth a ton of gold. So one way to shame them is to give out shame stars instead of golden stars. A shame star could be a red star, or any other symbol or color, and when you put the mouse pointer on it a box would show where it reads "I'm a covard v5.2", like it does with the golden stars where it says "Top ranker" or whatever the reason for the star is.
The gold star can be turned on and off but this star would always be visible, no way to turn it off. Perhaps if they win a fair round the shame star could be replaced by a golden star, but that would be the only way.
It is obviously hard to make exact rules for when a shame star is to be handed out instead of a gold star. So I belive admins would have to judge every round specificly and then decide what to do. There would be some guidelines but no exact rules. I know a lot of players feel the admins are crooked but every player can see when shame stars are needed so if the admins wouldn't hand them out it would be too obvious they are dirty (if they are will say) so I don't think that would be a big problem.
E.g. last round everybody, except perhaps the top of Winter and their dogs, can agree that shame stars would have been appropriate instead of golden stars. Don, sotto and consi of all the families would all have gotten a shame star and only one with a golden star would be top buster. That means top three of Winterhill, Summerhill, Infezione, Prestige, Motisi, Pentagram, Pentahouse, Mit, Jitem, Krays and probably a few more that I have forgot would have gotten a red shame star, more than 30 players would be shown as pussies to everyone.
I know there are ways to get around this but it would be a start at least. Something needs to be done. When players don't care to change the admins gotta try and change them.
Just my two cents, feel free to comment with your own thoughts.
bullshit
ites at 14:21:34 on 14/01:
shut up bitch
Merton at 12:34:51 on 14/01:
There we have it. OB's most constructive criticism award goes too...
Anonymous at 06:29:15 on 14/01:
bullshit
bullshit
There we have it. OB's most constructive criticism award goes too...
And the second...
Merton at 12:34:51 on 14/01:
There we have it. OB's most constructive criticism award goes too...
Anonymous at 06:29:15 on 14/01:
bullshit
bullshit
There we have it. OB's most constructive criticism award goes too...
Anonymous at 06:29:15 on 14/01:
bullshit
bullshit
There we have it. OB's most constructive criticism award goes too...
Anonymous (06:29:15 - 14-01)
Anonymous at 21:46:34 on 13/01:
Users Alive: 1,591
Quite shite. V5 is pretty nice but mass pacting makes more and more people to leave.
I made a ticket with a suggestion about the mass pacting issue last round but admin never cared to reply, I don't even know if they read the ticket. Thought I would let you guys know what I wrote and see what you all think about my idea.
I think they need to shame the mass blooders. Perhaps that would make a few tops think twice before joing in on a big pact and instead try to play for themselves.
Many tops are now chasing a golden star like they are worth a ton of gold. So one way to shame them is to give out shame stars instead of golden stars. A shame star could be a red star, or any other symbol or color, and when you put the mouse pointer on it a box would show where it reads "I'm a covard v5.2", like it does with the golden stars where it says "Top ranker" or whatever the reason for the star is.
The gold star can be turned on and off but this star would always be visible, no way to turn it off. Perhaps if they win a fair round the shame star could be replaced by a golden star, but that would be the only way.
It is obviously hard to make exact rules for when a shame star is to be handed out instead of a gold star. So I belive admins would have to judge every round specificly and then decide what to do. There would be some guidelines but no exact rules. I know a lot of players feel the admins are crooked but every player can see when shame stars are needed so if the admins wouldn't hand them out it would be too obvious they are dirty (if they are will say) so I don't think that would be a big problem.
E.g. last round everybody, except perhaps the top of Winter and their dogs, can agree that shame stars would have been appropriate instead of golden stars. Don, sotto and consi of all the families would all have gotten a shame star and only one with a golden star would be top buster. That means top three of Winterhill, Summerhill, Infezione, Prestige, Motisi, Pentagram, Pentahouse, Mit, Jitem, Krays and probably a few more that I have forgot would have gotten a red shame star, more than 30 players would be shown as pussies to everyone.
I know there are ways to get around this but it would be a start at least. Something needs to be done. When players don't care to change the admins gotta try and change them.
Just my two cents, feel free to comment with your own thoughts.
Users Alive: 1,591
Quite shite. V5 is pretty nice but mass pacting makes more and more people to leave.
I made a ticket with a suggestion about the mass pacting issue last round but admin never cared to reply, I don't even know if they read the ticket. Thought I would let you guys know what I wrote and see what you all think about my idea.
I think they need to shame the mass blooders. Perhaps that would make a few tops think twice before joing in on a big pact and instead try to play for themselves.
Many tops are now chasing a golden star like they are worth a ton of gold. So one way to shame them is to give out shame stars instead of golden stars. A shame star could be a red star, or any other symbol or color, and when you put the mouse pointer on it a box would show where it reads "I'm a covard v5.2", like it does with the golden stars where it says "Top ranker" or whatever the reason for the star is.
The gold star can be turned on and off but this star would always be visible, no way to turn it off. Perhaps if they win a fair round the shame star could be replaced by a golden star, but that would be the only way.
It is obviously hard to make exact rules for when a shame star is to be handed out instead of a gold star. So I belive admins would have to judge every round specificly and then decide what to do. There would be some guidelines but no exact rules. I know a lot of players feel the admins are crooked but every player can see when shame stars are needed so if the admins wouldn't hand them out it would be too obvious they are dirty (if they are will say) so I don't think that would be a big problem.
E.g. last round everybody, except perhaps the top of Winter and their dogs, can agree that shame stars would have been appropriate instead of golden stars. Don, sotto and consi of all the families would all have gotten a shame star and only one with a golden star would be top buster. That means top three of Winterhill, Summerhill, Infezione, Prestige, Motisi, Pentagram, Pentahouse, Mit, Jitem, Krays and probably a few more that I have forgot would have gotten a red shame star, more than 30 players would be shown as pussies to everyone.
I know there are ways to get around this but it would be a start at least. Something needs to be done. When players don't care to change the admins gotta try and change them.
Just my two cents, feel free to comment with your own thoughts.
bullshit
Anonymous (21:46:34 - 13-01)
Users Alive: 1,591
Quite shite. V5 is pretty nice but mass pacting makes more and more people to leave.
I made a ticket with a suggestion about the mass pacting issue last round but admin never cared to reply, I don't even know if they read the ticket. Thought I would let you guys know what I wrote and see what you all think about my idea.
I think they need to shame the mass blooders. Perhaps that would make a few tops think twice before joing in on a big pact and instead try to play for themselves.
Many tops are now chasing a golden star like they are worth a ton of gold. So one way to shame them is to give out shame stars instead of golden stars. A shame star could be a red star, or any other symbol or color, and when you put the mouse pointer on it a box would show where it reads "I'm a covard v5.2", like it does with the golden stars where it says "Top ranker" or whatever the reason for the star is.
The gold star can be turned on and off but this star would always be visible, no way to turn it off. Perhaps if they win a fair round the shame star could be replaced by a golden star, but that would be the only way.
It is obviously hard to make exact rules for when a shame star is to be handed out instead of a gold star. So I belive admins would have to judge every round specificly and then decide what to do. There would be some guidelines but no exact rules. I know a lot of players feel the admins are crooked but every player can see when shame stars are needed so if the admins wouldn't hand them out it would be too obvious they are dirty (if they are will say) so I don't think that would be a big problem.
E.g. last round everybody, except perhaps the top of Winter and their dogs, can agree that shame stars would have been appropriate instead of golden stars. Don, sotto and consi of all the families would all have gotten a shame star and only one with a golden star would be top buster. That means top three of Winterhill, Summerhill, Infezione, Prestige, Motisi, Pentagram, Pentahouse, Mit, Jitem, Krays and probably a few more that I have forgot would have gotten a red shame star, more than 30 players would be shown as pussies to everyone.
I know there are ways to get around this but it would be a start at least. Something needs to be done. When players don't care to change the admins gotta try and change them.
Just my two cents, feel free to comment with your own thoughts.
Quite shite. V5 is pretty nice but mass pacting makes more and more people to leave.
I made a ticket with a suggestion about the mass pacting issue last round but admin never cared to reply, I don't even know if they read the ticket. Thought I would let you guys know what I wrote and see what you all think about my idea.
I think they need to shame the mass blooders. Perhaps that would make a few tops think twice before joing in on a big pact and instead try to play for themselves.
Many tops are now chasing a golden star like they are worth a ton of gold. So one way to shame them is to give out shame stars instead of golden stars. A shame star could be a red star, or any other symbol or color, and when you put the mouse pointer on it a box would show where it reads "I'm a covard v5.2", like it does with the golden stars where it says "Top ranker" or whatever the reason for the star is.
The gold star can be turned on and off but this star would always be visible, no way to turn it off. Perhaps if they win a fair round the shame star could be replaced by a golden star, but that would be the only way.
It is obviously hard to make exact rules for when a shame star is to be handed out instead of a gold star. So I belive admins would have to judge every round specificly and then decide what to do. There would be some guidelines but no exact rules. I know a lot of players feel the admins are crooked but every player can see when shame stars are needed so if the admins wouldn't hand them out it would be too obvious they are dirty (if they are will say) so I don't think that would be a big problem.
E.g. last round everybody, except perhaps the top of Winter and their dogs, can agree that shame stars would have been appropriate instead of golden stars. Don, sotto and consi of all the families would all have gotten a shame star and only one with a golden star would be top buster. That means top three of Winterhill, Summerhill, Infezione, Prestige, Motisi, Pentagram, Pentahouse, Mit, Jitem, Krays and probably a few more that I have forgot would have gotten a red shame star, more than 30 players would be shown as pussies to everyone.
I know there are ways to get around this but it would be a start at least. Something needs to be done. When players don't care to change the admins gotta try and change them.
Just my two cents, feel free to comment with your own thoughts.
Critycal at 01:50:11 on 11/01:
As a representative of the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea I do not approve of American propaganda on free news outlets.
As a representative of the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea I do not approve of American propaganda on free news outlets.
Our button is bigger than yours, little rocket man.
Anonymous at 00:40:31 on 12/01:
Come and join Siberia o/
Anonymous at 19:44:49 on 11/01:
Which fams goes up next round? Worth playing? Better version than last or will there be a big lame Turk pact?
Which fams goes up next round? Worth playing? Better version than last or will there be a big lame Turk pact?
Anonymous (09:12:37 - 12-01)
Anonymous at 00:40:31 on 12/01:
Come and join Siberia o/
Anonymous at 19:44:49 on 11/01:
Which fams goes up next round? Worth playing? Better version than last or will there be a big lame Turk pact?
Which fams goes up next round? Worth playing? Better version than last or will there be a big lame Turk pact?
Anonymous (00:40:31 - 12-01)
Anonymous at 19:44:49 on 11/01:
Which fams goes up next round? Worth playing? Better version than last or will there be a big lame Turk pact?
Which fams goes up next round? Worth playing? Better version than last or will there be a big lame Turk pact?
Keeley at 23:17:06 on 10/01:
A LAZY turk that cant read thats new
wL at 07:32:16 on 10/01:
Quick sum pls guys. Too lazy to read all posts wtf.
Quick sum pls guys. Too lazy to read all posts wtf.
I'm interested to reach any conclusion and I see nothing in 325235 quoted messages.Anyway cumming back to play this shitty game again.
Anonymous (19:44:49 - 11-01)
Which fams goes up next round? Worth playing? Better version than last or will there be a big lame Turk pact?
Anonymous (19:00:58 - 11-01)
Keeley at 01:45:38 on 11/01:
Are we in "Hate Americans time" again?
its ok i can deal with it
Are we in "Hate Americans time" again?
its ok i can deal with it
Anonymous (16:50:45 - 11-01)
Anonymous at 17:38:41 on 10/01:
+1
Anonymous at 17:36:53 on 10/01:
Mr Observer has to be another anon Pony !
Anonymous at 17:27:17 on 10/01:
what is so special about a star? u feel better with one? :')
Anonymous at 15:38:07 on 10/01:
not even a pony here tbh just sum1 that likes to observe but you must be stupid if you thought colossal was the biggest factor of the win.. or else why does cryt have star?
u must be stupid if you think every1 that dislikes ur ass to be a pony XD
Saros`away at 15:19:07 on 10/01:
''only for sib have a real win the version after''
Strange, could have sworn I saw Colossal their name in HoF though. You're not exactly the smartest pony around, are you?
Anonymous at 14:22:54 on 10/01:
yer and all of the game saw how well it ended for you lmao, u won a version that isnt worth anything anymore by blooding all fams and stabbing and selling them later: only for sib have a real win the version after, colo doesnt care about you anymore, db doesnt care anymore, and you still get suicided for it, must have been your best choise ever XD
aet faggz thinking they are super cool on beyond LUL actually people think ur stabber shits
Anonymous at 12:58:05 on 10/01:
we did sell them out?
and it was the best day of omerta ever
Anonymous at 12:30:02 on 10/01:
I bet if you had siberia on your side still you would have sold them out without any doubt :')
Saros`away at 19:57:21 on 09/01:
inb4 You realize it was our own idea and choice, we can play nice with our friends like that, if we want too.
I still miss my star though. :(
Anonymous at 19:45:11 on 09/01:
you wouldnt change the name if you had enough power to convince assassino + leviticus to leave the hof to you alone. probably they are aware of this too. well, in an ironic way you lost your chance for star and aetleviassa will stand an abomination on hof page until the game finds it final. good luck next time
Saros`away at 18:44:10 on 09/01:
you wouldnt change the name if you had enough power to convince assassino + leviticus to leave the hof to you alone. probably they are aware of this too. well, in an ironic way you lost your chance for star and aetleviassa will stand an abomination on hof page until the game finds it final. good luck next time
inb4 You realize it was our own idea and choice, we can play nice with our friends like that, if we want too.
I still miss my star though. :(
I bet if you had siberia on your side still you would have sold them out without any doubt :')
we did sell them out?
and it was the best day of omerta ever
aet faggz thinking they are super cool on beyond LUL actually people think ur stabber shits
''only for sib have a real win the version after''
Strange, could have sworn I saw Colossal their name in HoF though. You're not exactly the smartest pony around, are you?
u must be stupid if you think every1 that dislikes ur ass to be a pony XD
what is so special about a star? u feel better with one? :')
Anonymous (13:20:04 - 11-01)
Redspeert at 23:53:28 on 10/01:
Wow racist much.
Keeley at 23:17:06 on 10/01:
A LAZY turk that cant read thats new
wL at 07:32:16 on 10/01:
Quick sum pls guys. Too lazy to read all posts wtf.
Quick sum pls guys. Too lazy to read all posts wtf.
Wow racist much.
ah yes, turks, the 5th race
Anonymous (13:09:18 - 11-01)
Redspeert at 01:08:10 on 11/01:
I think this song is more for you
Keeley at 00:21:21 on 11/01:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7vRSu_wsNc
lets dance
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7vRSu_wsNc
lets dance
I think this song is more for you
Percentage online: 100%
Days online: 2D 12H 15M
yea.. wonder if we gonna see any Akills on the 100% obvious cheats.. probably not but it would be a nice change compared to last vers
Haha, with only one active admin around you won't see much akills.