» Menu

» Login

» OB/Site News

Omerta News Integration
Comments: 57 - Views: 49255 - Votes: 0
War rating
Comments: 10 - Views: 24747 - Votes: 4
Reporters Wanted!
Comments: 2 - Views: 17643 - Votes: 3
» Articles
Date Comments Rating

General Comments & Major Rumors
Comments: 57,652 - Views: 13,861,343 - Votes: 81
Endless Struggle !
Comments: 336 - Views: 10,465 - Votes: 0
23-09 Reset → 30 September 2022, Friday → 12:00 OT
Comments: 64 - Views: 7,438 - Votes: 0
30-09 Welcome to Round #40!
Comments: 2 - Views: 1,383 - Votes: 0
19-09 Congratulations Reichsthaler!
Comments: 0 - Views: 1,091 - Votes: 0
01-09 Not Penny's boat..
Comments: 72 - Views: 12,326 - Votes: 0
21-08 First Family!
Comments: 6 - Views: 1,405 - Votes: 0
12-08 Welcome to Round #39
Comments: 5 - Views: 1,927 - Votes: 0
03-08 Reset → 12 August 2022, Friday → 10:00 OT
Comments: 17 - Views: 3,858 - Votes: 0
27-07 Congratulations Vengeance!
Comments: 8 - Views: 1,891 - Votes: 0
go back
go forward
» Barafranca News

» Online last 15 minutes

Guests: 794
Total members: 3720
Online: 0 (0%)
Members:
General Comments & Major Rumors
Author: sbanks
Last updated: 4413d 18h 18m 52s ago by MrWhite
Comments: 57,652
Views: 13,861,343
Votes: 81 (4.5 average)
article
General Comments & Major Rumors section.

Everyone knows where this section is for, keep it clean from flaming and only posts in english are allowed.
comments

Add a YouTube movie Add an image Add a link/url Help
Anonymous (19:20:27 - 15-01)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 13:53:19 on 15/01:
Anonymous at 12:51:17 on 15/01:
Anonymous at 09:46:36 on 15/01:
Anonymous at 00:18:01 on 15/01:
Percentage online: 100%

Days online: 2D 12H 15M

yea.. wonder if we gonna see any Akills on the 100% obvious cheats.. probably not but it would be a nice change compared to last vers

Haha, with only one active admin around you won't see much akills.
True bitchboy righello Quitted together with sharo.
Nothing much left..
is it true?
ye it is.
Anonymous (13:53:19 - 15-01)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 12:51:17 on 15/01:
Anonymous at 09:46:36 on 15/01:
Anonymous at 00:18:01 on 15/01:
Percentage online: 100%

Days online: 2D 12H 15M

yea.. wonder if we gonna see any Akills on the 100% obvious cheats.. probably not but it would be a nice change compared to last vers

Haha, with only one active admin around you won't see much akills.
True bitchboy righello Quitted together with sharo.
Nothing much left..
is it true?
Anonymous (12:51:17 - 15-01)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 09:46:36 on 15/01:
Anonymous at 00:18:01 on 15/01:
Percentage online: 100%

Days online: 2D 12H 15M

yea.. wonder if we gonna see any Akills on the 100% obvious cheats.. probably not but it would be a nice change compared to last vers

Haha, with only one active admin around you won't see much akills.
True bitchboy righello Quitted together with sharo.
Nothing much left..
Anonymous (11:28:55 - 15-01)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 00:12:18 on 15/01:
Anonymous at 23:19:54 on 14/01:
licavoli anyone know who were the tops?
Ellocors
Anyone Else? can't that remember name,
Anonymous (11:00:12 - 15-01)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 09:46:36 on 15/01:
Anonymous at 00:18:01 on 15/01:
Percentage online: 100%

Days online: 2D 12H 15M

yea.. wonder if we gonna see any Akills on the 100% obvious cheats.. probably not but it would be a nice change compared to last vers

Haha, with only one active admin around you won't see much akills.

Admins are aware of it, and there will be no akilling :)
Anonymous (09:46:36 - 15-01)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 00:18:01 on 15/01:
Percentage online: 100%

Days online: 2D 12H 15M

yea.. wonder if we gonna see any Akills on the 100% obvious cheats.. probably not but it would be a nice change compared to last vers

Haha, with only one active admin around you won't see much akills.
Anonymous (00:18:01 - 15-01)
Link Quote
Percentage online: 100%

Days online: 2D 12H 15M

yea.. wonder if we gonna see any Akills on the 100% obvious cheats.. probably not but it would be a nice change compared to last vers
Anonymous (00:12:18 - 15-01)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 23:19:54 on 14/01:
licavoli anyone know who were the tops?
Ellocors
Anonymous (23:19:54 - 14-01)
Link Quote
licavoli anyone know who were the tops?
Anonymous (20:28:09 - 14-01)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 06:29:15 on 14/01:
Anonymous at 21:46:34 on 13/01:
Users Alive: 1,591
Quite shite. V5 is pretty nice but mass pacting makes more and more people to leave.

I made a ticket with a suggestion about the mass pacting issue last round but admin never cared to reply, I don't even know if they read the ticket. Thought I would let you guys know what I wrote and see what you all think about my idea.

I think they need to shame the mass blooders. Perhaps that would make a few tops think twice before joing in on a big pact and instead try to play for themselves.

Many tops are now chasing a golden star like they are worth a ton of gold. So one way to shame them is to give out shame stars instead of golden stars. A shame star could be a red star, or any other symbol or color, and when you put the mouse pointer on it a box would show where it reads "I'm a covard v5.2", like it does with the golden stars where it says "Top ranker" or whatever the reason for the star is.

The gold star can be turned on and off but this star would always be visible, no way to turn it off. Perhaps if they win a fair round the shame star could be replaced by a golden star, but that would be the only way.

It is obviously hard to make exact rules for when a shame star is to be handed out instead of a gold star. So I belive admins would have to judge every round specificly and then decide what to do. There would be some guidelines but no exact rules. I know a lot of players feel the admins are crooked but every player can see when shame stars are needed so if the admins wouldn't hand them out it would be too obvious they are dirty (if they are will say) so I don't think that would be a big problem.

E.g. last round everybody, except perhaps the top of Winter and their dogs, can agree that shame stars would have been appropriate instead of golden stars. Don, sotto and consi of all the families would all have gotten a shame star and only one with a golden star would be top buster. That means top three of Winterhill, Summerhill, Infezione, Prestige, Motisi, Pentagram, Pentahouse, Mit, Jitem, Krays and probably a few more that I have forgot would have gotten a red shame star, more than 30 players would be shown as pussies to everyone.

I know there are ways to get around this but it would be a start at least. Something needs to be done. When players don't care to change the admins gotta try and change them.

Just my two cents, feel free to comment with your own thoughts.

bullshit
most of it cant be implemented i suppose because all of these are too cloudy and supposing it can be implemented, it would only work only when admins are objective which is fiercely wrong at this point.
Merton Ireland (17:19:00 - 14-01)
Link Quote
ites at 14:21:34 on 14/01:
Merton at 12:34:51 on 14/01:
Anonymous at 06:29:15 on 14/01:


bullshit

There we have it. OB's most constructive criticism award goes too...
shut up bitch


And the second...
ites Belgium (14:21:34 - 14-01)
Link Quote
Merton at 12:34:51 on 14/01:
Anonymous at 06:29:15 on 14/01:


bullshit

There we have it. OB's most constructive criticism award goes too...
shut up bitch
Merton Ireland (12:34:51 - 14-01)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 06:29:15 on 14/01:


bullshit

There we have it. OB's most constructive criticism award goes too...
Anonymous (06:29:15 - 14-01)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 21:46:34 on 13/01:
Users Alive: 1,591
Quite shite. V5 is pretty nice but mass pacting makes more and more people to leave.

I made a ticket with a suggestion about the mass pacting issue last round but admin never cared to reply, I don't even know if they read the ticket. Thought I would let you guys know what I wrote and see what you all think about my idea.

I think they need to shame the mass blooders. Perhaps that would make a few tops think twice before joing in on a big pact and instead try to play for themselves.

Many tops are now chasing a golden star like they are worth a ton of gold. So one way to shame them is to give out shame stars instead of golden stars. A shame star could be a red star, or any other symbol or color, and when you put the mouse pointer on it a box would show where it reads "I'm a covard v5.2", like it does with the golden stars where it says "Top ranker" or whatever the reason for the star is.

The gold star can be turned on and off but this star would always be visible, no way to turn it off. Perhaps if they win a fair round the shame star could be replaced by a golden star, but that would be the only way.

It is obviously hard to make exact rules for when a shame star is to be handed out instead of a gold star. So I belive admins would have to judge every round specificly and then decide what to do. There would be some guidelines but no exact rules. I know a lot of players feel the admins are crooked but every player can see when shame stars are needed so if the admins wouldn't hand them out it would be too obvious they are dirty (if they are will say) so I don't think that would be a big problem.

E.g. last round everybody, except perhaps the top of Winter and their dogs, can agree that shame stars would have been appropriate instead of golden stars. Don, sotto and consi of all the families would all have gotten a shame star and only one with a golden star would be top buster. That means top three of Winterhill, Summerhill, Infezione, Prestige, Motisi, Pentagram, Pentahouse, Mit, Jitem, Krays and probably a few more that I have forgot would have gotten a red shame star, more than 30 players would be shown as pussies to everyone.

I know there are ways to get around this but it would be a start at least. Something needs to be done. When players don't care to change the admins gotta try and change them.

Just my two cents, feel free to comment with your own thoughts.

bullshit
Anonymous (21:46:34 - 13-01)
Link Quote
Users Alive: 1,591
Quite shite. V5 is pretty nice but mass pacting makes more and more people to leave.

I made a ticket with a suggestion about the mass pacting issue last round but admin never cared to reply, I don't even know if they read the ticket. Thought I would let you guys know what I wrote and see what you all think about my idea.

I think they need to shame the mass blooders. Perhaps that would make a few tops think twice before joing in on a big pact and instead try to play for themselves.

Many tops are now chasing a golden star like they are worth a ton of gold. So one way to shame them is to give out shame stars instead of golden stars. A shame star could be a red star, or any other symbol or color, and when you put the mouse pointer on it a box would show where it reads "I'm a covard v5.2", like it does with the golden stars where it says "Top ranker" or whatever the reason for the star is.

The gold star can be turned on and off but this star would always be visible, no way to turn it off. Perhaps if they win a fair round the shame star could be replaced by a golden star, but that would be the only way.

It is obviously hard to make exact rules for when a shame star is to be handed out instead of a gold star. So I belive admins would have to judge every round specificly and then decide what to do. There would be some guidelines but no exact rules. I know a lot of players feel the admins are crooked but every player can see when shame stars are needed so if the admins wouldn't hand them out it would be too obvious they are dirty (if they are will say) so I don't think that would be a big problem.

E.g. last round everybody, except perhaps the top of Winter and their dogs, can agree that shame stars would have been appropriate instead of golden stars. Don, sotto and consi of all the families would all have gotten a shame star and only one with a golden star would be top buster. That means top three of Winterhill, Summerhill, Infezione, Prestige, Motisi, Pentagram, Pentahouse, Mit, Jitem, Krays and probably a few more that I have forgot would have gotten a red shame star, more than 30 players would be shown as pussies to everyone.

I know there are ways to get around this but it would be a start at least. Something needs to be done. When players don't care to change the admins gotta try and change them.

Just my two cents, feel free to comment with your own thoughts.
Jimbo United States (15:29:44 - 12-01)
Link Quote
Critycal at 01:50:11 on 11/01:
As a representative of the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea I do not approve of American propaganda on free news outlets.


Our button is bigger than yours, little rocket man.
wL Turkey (13:39:30 - 12-01)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 00:40:31 on 12/01:
Anonymous at 19:44:49 on 11/01:
Which fams goes up next round? Worth playing? Better version than last or will there be a big lame Turk pact?
Come and join Siberia o/
talk to saros for transfer fee haha
Anonymous (09:12:37 - 12-01)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 00:40:31 on 12/01:
Anonymous at 19:44:49 on 11/01:
Which fams goes up next round? Worth playing? Better version than last or will there be a big lame Turk pact?
Come and join Siberia o/
thought siberia aint playing.
Anonymous (00:40:31 - 12-01)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 19:44:49 on 11/01:
Which fams goes up next round? Worth playing? Better version than last or will there be a big lame Turk pact?
Come and join Siberia o/
wL Turkey (19:46:22 - 11-01)
Link Quote
Keeley at 23:17:06 on 10/01:
wL at 07:32:16 on 10/01:
Quick sum pls guys. Too lazy to read all posts wtf.
A LAZY turk that cant read thats new

I'm interested to reach any conclusion and I see nothing in 325235 quoted messages.Anyway cumming back to play this shitty game again.