Thursday - November 28th - 2024
» Menu

» Login

» OB/Site News

Omerta News Integration
Comments: 58 - Views: 54543 - Votes: 0
War rating
Comments: 10 - Views: 26286 - Votes: 4
Reporters Wanted!
Comments: 2 - Views: 18295 - Votes: 3
» Articles
Date Comments Rating

General Comments & Major Rumors
Comments: 57,985 - Views: 15,794,954 - Votes: 81
Endless Struggle !
Comments: 509 - Views: 17,206 - Votes: 0
23-09 Reset → 30 September 2022, Friday → 12:00 OT
Comments: 70 - Views: 8,791 - Votes: 0
30-09 Welcome to Round #40!
Comments: 2 - Views: 2,123 - Votes: 0
19-09 Congratulations Reichsthaler!
Comments: 0 - Views: 2,014 - Votes: 0
01-09 Not Penny's boat..
Comments: 72 - Views: 18,025 - Votes: 0
21-08 First Family!
Comments: 6 - Views: 2,567 - Votes: 0
12-08 Welcome to Round #39
Comments: 5 - Views: 2,473 - Votes: 0
03-08 Reset → 12 August 2022, Friday → 10:00 OT
Comments: 17 - Views: 5,169 - Votes: 0
27-07 Congratulations Vengeance!
Comments: 8 - Views: 2,666 - Votes: 0
go back
go forward
» Barafranca News

No news found. Reset in progress?
» Online last 15 minutes

Guests: 514
Total members: 3748
Online: 0 (0%)
Members:
General Comments & Major Rumors
Author: sbanks
Last updated: 4657d 15h 28m 43s ago by MrWhite
Comments: 57,985
Views: 15,794,954
Votes: 81 (4.5 average)
article
General Comments & Major Rumors section.

Everyone knows where this section is for, keep it clean from flaming and only posts in english are allowed.
comments

Add a YouTube movie Add an image Add a link/url Help
Anonymous (01:02:49 - 23-08)
Link Quote
Giddiness at 00:49:27 on 23/08:
It took me awhile to figure it out but the thing that ruins the game isn't pacting. The thing that ruins the game is bloods. Cuz no matter what you all see, when you accept some fam as blood, you more or less make a pact with it. It has been proven that bloods mean more than as1 sometimes too. Don't get me wrong there will always be bigger fams that you won't be able to take down alone but once the use of those who helped you is gone you can do whateva you want. Cuz after all the point of the game is being mafia guy and bla bla. But mafia families are only about their own families and how to make it stronger.
Just thinking out loud..

There's no incentive to play Nazdrovia style aka "Use and Abuse your bloods".

It's not like people and fam tops suffer from amnesia. THey remember very well which fams are cooperative and reliable and which are lying backstabbers. Which fams would you blood the following version?
I know I would try to avoid blooding Nazdrovia at all costs, because of their history.

You want to get rid off pacting. Vote NO on the ROM and do not bother to rerank, while there are 15 fams up, whose only business is, sticking their fingers in each others ass with no intention whatsoever to kill each other. Only reset versions with a fair amount of families.
Giddiness Bulgaria (00:49:27 - 23-08)
Link Quote
It took me awhile to figure it out but the thing that ruins the game isn't pacting. The thing that ruins the game is bloods. Cuz no matter what you all see, when you accept some fam as blood, you more or less make a pact with it. It has been proven that bloods mean more than as1 sometimes too. Don't get me wrong there will always be bigger fams that you won't be able to take down alone but once the use of those who helped you is gone you can do whateva you want. Cuz after all the point of the game is being mafia guy and bla bla. But mafia families are only about their own families and how to make it stronger.
Just thinking out loud..
Anonymous (21:38:06 - 22-08)
Link Quote
Tseeton at 21:22:04 on 22/08:
Cmooooon Reset this shit

There are more than 10 fams up. Don't reset until that number is down to 5 or so.

That would make versions more interesting. Crew announcement not to reset unless there is less than a certain numbers of families left.
Makes it less rewarding to join a 15 fam bloodweb if at least half of it would need to get cleaned before reset.
Tseeton Greece (21:22:04 - 22-08)
Link Quote
Cmooooon Reset this shit
Anonymous (20:50:01 - 22-08)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 20:47:55 on 22/08:
what is going on with coccada?

Looks like they are failing on anarchy. Another fam that can't so jack with out a gangbang ;)
Anonymous (20:49:01 - 22-08)
Link Quote
fired at anarchy i guess :) failing hard to bf ^^
Anonymous (20:48:26 - 22-08)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 20:47:55 on 22/08:
what is going on with coccada?
who cares? just another useless fam going down
Anonymous (20:47:55 - 22-08)
Link Quote
what is going on with coccada?
Anonymous (20:01:35 - 22-08)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 17:18:10 on 22/08:
Anonymous at 17:09:34 on 22/08:
Psychonicus is being hijacked LOL

again that noob don moondark
thinks he plays game alone
there is something very much wrong there - Bladiebla dead but still a don - members 49 - HQ 25...wtf? :o
Anonymous (19:05:43 - 22-08)
Link Quote
Soph at 16:48:32 on 22/08:
Anonymous at 12:53:45 on 22/08:
"As a collective of families opens fire on the Jannisary alliance.The collective consists of; Pavleone, Righelli, Krays, Faffie, Pervoli, Casappa, Monte Carlo and Inzerillo."

So much to Krays won't Gangbang xD.


Good point, yet horribly brought. If Janni+ consists of 6 families and has 12 bloods with each a chance to jump in, of which 7 were in top 10 at that time, families should be allowed to gangbang as there's enough reason to expect insane counters.

Apply cold water in the burned area.
Anonymous (17:18:10 - 22-08)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 17:09:34 on 22/08:
Psychonicus is being hijacked LOL

again that noob don moondark
thinks he plays game alone
Anonymous (17:09:34 - 22-08)
Link Quote
Psychonicus is being hijacked LOL

Anonymous (17:05:45 - 22-08)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 16:45:39 on 22/08:
Saros`away at 16:01:25 on 22/08:
Anonymous at 15:46:51 on 22/08:
Anonymous at 15:34:20 on 22/08:
Anonymous at 13:28:11 on 22/08:
well Vaffanculo got a lot of help last version, why i don't know, that do only the ones involved.
It could be that vaffanculo just doesn't show their connections openly, afterall its a mafiagame, lying and pretending is given. But don't nail me on that assumption, as it could be false too.
So its hard to tell who is with who and how the various connections are.
But for me it doesn't change the point that it is a struggle to survive, you invest time and money into the accounts and you most certainly don't want to die in a fluke. Every version showed, there are pacts, alliances and gangbangs. Its hard to pin someone down.
Faffie has chosen to be more part of pact and gangbang instead of getting banged version after version. I think this gangbang, pact mentality won't change soon.
Noone wants a dead account afterall.

vaffanculo finished it with 4 families including themselves, it's a major difference compared to regular versions. Also I can't remember them doing a single gangbang that version, I could be wrong on that tho.

depends how we define gangbang, regardless that there is nowhere stated vaffanculo has done gangbang...they had just way more help than from known bloods.

There were 5 on 2, 8 on 4 and 4 on 1 in vaffans wars.
But thats just the involved fams, the ratios of brugs may vary, thats why it hard to define.
You could say 5 fams on 2 is no gangbang, but if the actually ratio of brugs is 10 to 1 you could define it as gangbang again.

We always tried to keep our ratios as low as possible, the only war that even remotely could be considered a gangbang was against Trafficante (Vaffanculo/Messina+Ascension/Signoria+Coccada which is either 3 or 5 depending on how you look at it) and that was after we shot Tempestuoso and Redarmy just a few hours before it.

Regardless you can have all the brugs in the world, but you still won't have them all online and ready to shoot during wartime.

well we can say, it looks often as it were gangbangs from fams involved and their size, but that doesn't say how many are shooting actually. fam ratio could be 8 to 1 but shooting close to 1 on 1. You (Vaffan) have done great last version, overall very solid version win. To be honest the problem was for this version the whole bloodweb and the time to gear up. So, all were loaded and regardless who you attack there will be alot of people and fams involved. Normally you don't have that much time to get bullets. And the lack of smaller wars inbetween strenghtens that view.
Everyone geared up almost right from the beginnung to that one deciding clash.


The problem of this version is that people stop shooting when there's still families alive. If Faffie or Anarchy wants to win the version they should gun down the rest of the fams. On the other hand I do not understand why those other families don't do any shooting, it's always the same families that do the shooting (in this case Faffie that is involved in most wars).

I don't see any reason why more than 5 families should be kept alive this version (by the winners).
Soph Netherlands (16:48:32 - 22-08)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 12:53:45 on 22/08:
"As a collective of families opens fire on the Jannisary alliance.The collective consists of; Pavleone, Righelli, Krays, Faffie, Pervoli, Casappa, Monte Carlo and Inzerillo."

So much to Krays won't Gangbang xD.


Good point, yet horribly brought. If Janni+ consists of 6 families and has 12 bloods with each a chance to jump in, of which 7 were in top 10 at that time, families should be allowed to gangbang as there's enough reason to expect insane counters.
Anonymous (16:45:39 - 22-08)
Link Quote
Saros`away at 16:01:25 on 22/08:
Anonymous at 15:46:51 on 22/08:
Anonymous at 15:34:20 on 22/08:
Anonymous at 13:28:11 on 22/08:
well Vaffanculo got a lot of help last version, why i don't know, that do only the ones involved.
It could be that vaffanculo just doesn't show their connections openly, afterall its a mafiagame, lying and pretending is given. But don't nail me on that assumption, as it could be false too.
So its hard to tell who is with who and how the various connections are.
But for me it doesn't change the point that it is a struggle to survive, you invest time and money into the accounts and you most certainly don't want to die in a fluke. Every version showed, there are pacts, alliances and gangbangs. Its hard to pin someone down.
Faffie has chosen to be more part of pact and gangbang instead of getting banged version after version. I think this gangbang, pact mentality won't change soon.
Noone wants a dead account afterall.

vaffanculo finished it with 4 families including themselves, it's a major difference compared to regular versions. Also I can't remember them doing a single gangbang that version, I could be wrong on that tho.

depends how we define gangbang, regardless that there is nowhere stated vaffanculo has done gangbang...they had just way more help than from known bloods.

There were 5 on 2, 8 on 4 and 4 on 1 in vaffans wars.
But thats just the involved fams, the ratios of brugs may vary, thats why it hard to define.
You could say 5 fams on 2 is no gangbang, but if the actually ratio of brugs is 10 to 1 you could define it as gangbang again.

We always tried to keep our ratios as low as possible, the only war that even remotely could be considered a gangbang was against Trafficante (Vaffanculo/Messina+Ascension/Signoria+Coccada which is either 3 or 5 depending on how you look at it) and that was after we shot Tempestuoso and Redarmy just a few hours before it.

Regardless you can have all the brugs in the world, but you still won't have them all online and ready to shoot during wartime.

well we can say, it looks often as it were gangbangs from fams involved and their size, but that doesn't say how many are shooting actually. fam ratio could be 8 to 1 but shooting close to 1 on 1. You (Vaffan) have done great last version, overall very solid version win. To be honest the problem was for this version the whole bloodweb and the time to gear up. So, all were loaded and regardless who you attack there will be alot of people and fams involved. Normally you don't have that much time to get bullets. And the lack of smaller wars inbetween strenghtens that view.
Everyone geared up almost right from the beginnung to that one deciding clash.
olaola Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha (16:40:11 - 22-08)
Link Quote
version is dead now, nobody sells dc's anymore
now the only ones who will rank is ppl that use real money :D
Aart (16:01:28 - 22-08)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 15:49:35 on 22/08:
Voted YES on ROM

i want a clean version with changes implemented before start

then vote no you dumb fuck. patches haven't been finished yet.
Saros`away Netherlands (16:01:25 - 22-08)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 15:46:51 on 22/08:
Anonymous at 15:34:20 on 22/08:
Anonymous at 13:28:11 on 22/08:
well Vaffanculo got a lot of help last version, why i don't know, that do only the ones involved.
It could be that vaffanculo just doesn't show their connections openly, afterall its a mafiagame, lying and pretending is given. But don't nail me on that assumption, as it could be false too.
So its hard to tell who is with who and how the various connections are.
But for me it doesn't change the point that it is a struggle to survive, you invest time and money into the accounts and you most certainly don't want to die in a fluke. Every version showed, there are pacts, alliances and gangbangs. Its hard to pin someone down.
Faffie has chosen to be more part of pact and gangbang instead of getting banged version after version. I think this gangbang, pact mentality won't change soon.
Noone wants a dead account afterall.

vaffanculo finished it with 4 families including themselves, it's a major difference compared to regular versions. Also I can't remember them doing a single gangbang that version, I could be wrong on that tho.

depends how we define gangbang, regardless that there is nowhere stated vaffanculo has done gangbang...they had just way more help than from known bloods.

There were 5 on 2, 8 on 4 and 4 on 1 in vaffans wars.
But thats just the involved fams, the ratios of brugs may vary, thats why it hard to define.
You could say 5 fams on 2 is no gangbang, but if the actually ratio of brugs is 10 to 1 you could define it as gangbang again.

We always tried to keep our ratios as low as possible, the only war that even remotely could be considered a gangbang was against Trafficante (Vaffanculo/Messina+Ascension/Signoria+Coccada which is either 3 or 5 depending on how you look at it) and that was after we shot Tempestuoso and Redarmy just a few hours before it.

Regardless you can have all the brugs in the world, but you still won't have them all online and ready to shoot during wartime.
Anonymous (15:49:35 - 22-08)
Link Quote
Voted YES on ROM

i want a clean version with changes implemented before start
Anonymous (15:46:51 - 22-08)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 15:34:20 on 22/08:
Anonymous at 13:28:11 on 22/08:
well Vaffanculo got a lot of help last version, why i don't know, that do only the ones involved.
It could be that vaffanculo just doesn't show their connections openly, afterall its a mafiagame, lying and pretending is given. But don't nail me on that assumption, as it could be false too.
So its hard to tell who is with who and how the various connections are.
But for me it doesn't change the point that it is a struggle to survive, you invest time and money into the accounts and you most certainly don't want to die in a fluke. Every version showed, there are pacts, alliances and gangbangs. Its hard to pin someone down.
Faffie has chosen to be more part of pact and gangbang instead of getting banged version after version. I think this gangbang, pact mentality won't change soon.
Noone wants a dead account afterall.

vaffanculo finished it with 4 families including themselves, it's a major difference compared to regular versions. Also I can't remember them doing a single gangbang that version, I could be wrong on that tho.

depends how we define gangbang, regardless that there is nowhere stated vaffanculo has done gangbang...they had just way more help than from known bloods.

There were 5 on 2, 8 on 4 and 4 on 1 in vaffans wars.
But thats just the involved fams, the ratios of brugs may vary, thats why it hard to define.
You could say 5 fams on 2 is no gangbang, but if the actually ratio of brugs is 10 to 1 you could define it as gangbang again.