» Menu
» OB/Site News
» Articles
» Barafranca News
No news found. Reset in progress?
 |
|
article
General Comments & Major Rumors section.
Everyone knows where this section is for, keep it clean from flaming and only posts in english are allowed.
Everyone knows where this section is for, keep it clean from flaming and only posts in english are allowed.
Anonymous (18:45:29 - 09-04)
PPAL (18:19:00 - 09-04)
Anonymous at 15:11:45 on 09/04:
Brando has a couple of other projects running alongside Omerta that make him more money.
Omerta is just a side-project that fills his pocket without him having to invest any time or money in the game.
For example, look at his facebook page..last omerta related post was on 7 march..1 month silence since then. Yet he promises in his blog that he is gonna come to the office and talk to lilmike about tiredness, amongst other bullshit promises.
Only an idiot still pays for this piece of crap game.
Brando has a couple of other projects running alongside Omerta that make him more money.
Omerta is just a side-project that fills his pocket without him having to invest any time or money in the game.
For example, look at his facebook page..last omerta related post was on 7 march..1 month silence since then. Yet he promises in his blog that he is gonna come to the office and talk to lilmike about tiredness, amongst other bullshit promises.
Only an idiot still pays for this piece of crap game.
if im not wrong, he wrote in his fb page or somewhere that he opened another game , dunno about what , btw who cares.
PPAL (18:14:56 - 09-04)
PPAL at 18:13:58 on 09/04:
lol bramblemouse, what is the senso to ask for vote when have only 10 fams left? just clock the button and reset, oh gosh....
lol bramblemouse, what is the senso to ask for vote when have only 10 fams left? just clock the button and reset, oh gosh....
shit i lokk like a drunk ahah , btw np i dont drink when im slepping
PPAL (18:13:58 - 09-04)
lol bramblemouse, what is the senso to ask for vote when have only 10 fams left? just clock the button and reset, oh gosh....
Anonymous (17:24:19 - 09-04)
Damn another turk fam will get voucher after pentagram and leviticus
Anonymous (16:19:34 - 09-04)
PannaJunk at 14:09:27 on 09/04:
I dont understand the messina part this version ? were they up ? why did i miss that ? I always join messina when they are up so kinda childish they made it without me :/
Im just chilling in umbrella because morgash wanted to make his own family this version. I must warn Drima vero and arcanine because they also missed the whole messina family thingie this version....
I dont understand the messina part this version ? were they up ? why did i miss that ? I always join messina when they are up so kinda childish they made it without me :/
Im just chilling in umbrella because morgash wanted to make his own family this version. I must warn Drima vero and arcanine because they also missed the whole messina family thingie this version....
This is pretty funny, considering Drimacus is using fake nick, don.. and has ~ in umbrella. ;)
Anonymous (15:11:45 - 09-04)
Brando has a couple of other projects running alongside Omerta that make him more money.
Omerta is just a side-project that fills his pocket without him having to invest any time or money in the game.
For example, look at his facebook page..last omerta related post was on 7 march..1 month silence since then. Yet he promises in his blog that he is gonna come to the office and talk to lilmike about tiredness, amongst other bullshit promises.
Only an idiot still pays for this piece of crap game.
Omerta is just a side-project that fills his pocket without him having to invest any time or money in the game.
For example, look at his facebook page..last omerta related post was on 7 march..1 month silence since then. Yet he promises in his blog that he is gonna come to the office and talk to lilmike about tiredness, amongst other bullshit promises.
Only an idiot still pays for this piece of crap game.
Timelord|retired unregistered (15:00:27 - 09-04)
Stanto at 14:37:29 on 09/04:
Agree with you , but take a fact on a long terms , they lose players from each version they made , with each reset of game , they got money on a start of version and then money going to drop , so in 1 max 2 year game will be totaly dead , so what is better , bring people back with a less money take , proportionally , 10k players buying dcs (1 big version ) , better then 300 players per version (6 version) = 1800 , just dont tell me , are you crazy there are more players , we all knows that are all dupes or teamviewer players ...thats are fact for one way or otherwise game will shut down in next 1 year or max 2 ...
Anonymous at 15:11:38 on 08/04:
I don't think it's much cheaper, either way. They have on server on which the versions are run, they can't reduce it to 0 servers. So this 1 server is there no matter how many versions they host.
What other costs do we have. Crew. No, I won't rant on how properly incapable and lacklustre they are. But let's see. Help deks are volunteers, thus they get nothing. People who actually get paid are developers and programmers, and version managers like bramble and the almighty CEO as he calls himself fills his purse (obviously). And with the amount of dedication they show towards .com the supposedly biggest and thus most important version, I dare not to ask how their work looks at the other smaller versions. I should guess they spent even less time on those (if possible). So in short, what I wanted to say earlier. I think one version can in theory decrease your expenditures, but looking at omerta, I really think there's not much of a difference between running 1, 2 or 10 versions. The proside for players in one big version would be, that the paid crew members would actually have more time to spend on one version (theoretically). But for Omerta Ltd. it would just decrease the income. I fully agree with you.
Anon at 14:55:00 on 08/04:
I fairly believe they have one server, as all versions servers are hosted in Canada that server can probably take 100k players and as u know all servers together dont even have 50k players so its probably much cheaper.
They have been running this for 10 years, even when there weren't that much dc's (no lackeys) sold they were still able to make something out of it otherwise Brando would never have thought of buying this crap.
So in reality they are making alot of cash, after a reset i estimate they make 300-500euros a day on .com minimum.
Anonymous at 14:37:50 on 08/04:
Question is, if the expenditures to run more versions is higher than the decrease in income if you just create two big versions.
Somehow I (believe the running costs of a version are a non-factor, if so your argumentation is valid.
Anon at 14:33:58 on 08/04:
That is kind of wrong, altough i agree with your point that its a good idea but it wont bring in more money, it will bring in less money so admins wont agree on this untill there is like 100 players on all version.
Because some people play 2/3 versions, meaning they buy 2/3 dc's more instead of just one for the version they are playing. And Brando is money hungry so he wont agree.
Stanto at 13:33:01 on 08/04:
The best way to bring back players and bring back more then 10k players is to stop all other omerta versions .tr .nl .pt .fr .de .no
Just go .dm and .com , and if players from those countries wanna play on they language just give him options to put there acc on they language and that's it . Don't split players in 5 versions of game . DM for testing and COM for competition . This solution is good for both the administrators and the players . More players = more money for them , and for us more interesting and more fun and competition spirits .
The best way to bring back players and bring back more then 10k players is to stop all other omerta versions .tr .nl .pt .fr .de .no
Just go .dm and .com , and if players from those countries wanna play on they language just give him options to put there acc on they language and that's it . Don't split players in 5 versions of game . DM for testing and COM for competition . This solution is good for both the administrators and the players . More players = more money for them , and for us more interesting and more fun and competition spirits .
That is kind of wrong, altough i agree with your point that its a good idea but it wont bring in more money, it will bring in less money so admins wont agree on this untill there is like 100 players on all version.
Because some people play 2/3 versions, meaning they buy 2/3 dc's more instead of just one for the version they are playing. And Brando is money hungry so he wont agree.
Question is, if the expenditures to run more versions is higher than the decrease in income if you just create two big versions.
Somehow I (believe the running costs of a version are a non-factor, if so your argumentation is valid.
I fairly believe they have one server, as all versions servers are hosted in Canada that server can probably take 100k players and as u know all servers together dont even have 50k players so its probably much cheaper.
They have been running this for 10 years, even when there weren't that much dc's (no lackeys) sold they were still able to make something out of it otherwise Brando would never have thought of buying this crap.
So in reality they are making alot of cash, after a reset i estimate they make 300-500euros a day on .com minimum.
I don't think it's much cheaper, either way. They have on server on which the versions are run, they can't reduce it to 0 servers. So this 1 server is there no matter how many versions they host.
What other costs do we have. Crew. No, I won't rant on how properly incapable and lacklustre they are. But let's see. Help deks are volunteers, thus they get nothing. People who actually get paid are developers and programmers, and version managers like bramble and the almighty CEO as he calls himself fills his purse (obviously). And with the amount of dedication they show towards .com the supposedly biggest and thus most important version, I dare not to ask how their work looks at the other smaller versions. I should guess they spent even less time on those (if possible). So in short, what I wanted to say earlier. I think one version can in theory decrease your expenditures, but looking at omerta, I really think there's not much of a difference between running 1, 2 or 10 versions. The proside for players in one big version would be, that the paid crew members would actually have more time to spend on one version (theoretically). But for Omerta Ltd. it would just decrease the income. I fully agree with you.
Agree with you , but take a fact on a long terms , they lose players from each version they made , with each reset of game , they got money on a start of version and then money going to drop , so in 1 max 2 year game will be totaly dead , so what is better , bring people back with a less money take , proportionally , 10k players buying dcs (1 big version ) , better then 300 players per version (6 version) = 1800 , just dont tell me , are you crazy there are more players , we all knows that are all dupes or teamviewer players ...thats are fact for one way or otherwise game will shut down in next 1 year or max 2 ...
1-2 assumptions are not correct though.
You assume those player on .nl .pt .no .dm .tr .igiveafuck don't play .com.
There are some "hopeless" die hard players, who play 2 or more versions. To close down one version means one version less to take money from them (at least during resets). So instead of let's say 3 versions with at least one account to sustain, you would reduce that one version. Or do you think, that a player with let's say 3 accounts .com and 3 accounts on .nl will just move 3 more accounts to .com because .nl no longer exists?
Another assumptions I have soe difficulty with is the notion, that one big version would bring back player. Why would anybody who quit playing for whatsoever reason pick up playing just because the version is bigger?
In short I think if omerta just went down to one version they would rather lose accounts (I am not talking about players) in total than increase the numbers.
I am not even talking about the nuisance a potential influx of another ottoman like would cause (if it happens). I can imagine that in at least every second news post somebody would feel obliged to write "English or GTFO".
Stanto (14:37:29 - 09-04)
Anonymous at 15:11:38 on 08/04:
I don't think it's much cheaper, either way. They have on server on which the versions are run, they can't reduce it to 0 servers. So this 1 server is there no matter how many versions they host.
What other costs do we have. Crew. No, I won't rant on how properly incapable and lacklustre they are. But let's see. Help deks are volunteers, thus they get nothing. People who actually get paid are developers and programmers, and version managers like bramble and the almighty CEO as he calls himself fills his purse (obviously). And with the amount of dedication they show towards .com the supposedly biggest and thus most important version, I dare not to ask how their work looks at the other smaller versions. I should guess they spent even less time on those (if possible). So in short, what I wanted to say earlier. I think one version can in theory decrease your expenditures, but looking at omerta, I really think there's not much of a difference between running 1, 2 or 10 versions. The proside for players in one big version would be, that the paid crew members would actually have more time to spend on one version (theoretically). But for Omerta Ltd. it would just decrease the income. I fully agree with you.
Anon at 14:55:00 on 08/04:
I fairly believe they have one server, as all versions servers are hosted in Canada that server can probably take 100k players and as u know all servers together dont even have 50k players so its probably much cheaper.
They have been running this for 10 years, even when there weren't that much dc's (no lackeys) sold they were still able to make something out of it otherwise Brando would never have thought of buying this crap.
So in reality they are making alot of cash, after a reset i estimate they make 300-500euros a day on .com minimum.
Anonymous at 14:37:50 on 08/04:
Question is, if the expenditures to run more versions is higher than the decrease in income if you just create two big versions.
Somehow I (believe the running costs of a version are a non-factor, if so your argumentation is valid.
Anon at 14:33:58 on 08/04:
That is kind of wrong, altough i agree with your point that its a good idea but it wont bring in more money, it will bring in less money so admins wont agree on this untill there is like 100 players on all version.
Because some people play 2/3 versions, meaning they buy 2/3 dc's more instead of just one for the version they are playing. And Brando is money hungry so he wont agree.
Stanto at 13:33:01 on 08/04:
The best way to bring back players and bring back more then 10k players is to stop all other omerta versions .tr .nl .pt .fr .de .no
Just go .dm and .com , and if players from those countries wanna play on they language just give him options to put there acc on they language and that's it . Don't split players in 5 versions of game . DM for testing and COM for competition . This solution is good for both the administrators and the players . More players = more money for them , and for us more interesting and more fun and competition spirits .
The best way to bring back players and bring back more then 10k players is to stop all other omerta versions .tr .nl .pt .fr .de .no
Just go .dm and .com , and if players from those countries wanna play on they language just give him options to put there acc on they language and that's it . Don't split players in 5 versions of game . DM for testing and COM for competition . This solution is good for both the administrators and the players . More players = more money for them , and for us more interesting and more fun and competition spirits .
That is kind of wrong, altough i agree with your point that its a good idea but it wont bring in more money, it will bring in less money so admins wont agree on this untill there is like 100 players on all version.
Because some people play 2/3 versions, meaning they buy 2/3 dc's more instead of just one for the version they are playing. And Brando is money hungry so he wont agree.
Question is, if the expenditures to run more versions is higher than the decrease in income if you just create two big versions.
Somehow I (believe the running costs of a version are a non-factor, if so your argumentation is valid.
I fairly believe they have one server, as all versions servers are hosted in Canada that server can probably take 100k players and as u know all servers together dont even have 50k players so its probably much cheaper.
They have been running this for 10 years, even when there weren't that much dc's (no lackeys) sold they were still able to make something out of it otherwise Brando would never have thought of buying this crap.
So in reality they are making alot of cash, after a reset i estimate they make 300-500euros a day on .com minimum.
I don't think it's much cheaper, either way. They have on server on which the versions are run, they can't reduce it to 0 servers. So this 1 server is there no matter how many versions they host.
What other costs do we have. Crew. No, I won't rant on how properly incapable and lacklustre they are. But let's see. Help deks are volunteers, thus they get nothing. People who actually get paid are developers and programmers, and version managers like bramble and the almighty CEO as he calls himself fills his purse (obviously). And with the amount of dedication they show towards .com the supposedly biggest and thus most important version, I dare not to ask how their work looks at the other smaller versions. I should guess they spent even less time on those (if possible). So in short, what I wanted to say earlier. I think one version can in theory decrease your expenditures, but looking at omerta, I really think there's not much of a difference between running 1, 2 or 10 versions. The proside for players in one big version would be, that the paid crew members would actually have more time to spend on one version (theoretically). But for Omerta Ltd. it would just decrease the income. I fully agree with you.
Agree with you , but take a fact on a long terms , they lose players from each version they made , with each reset of game , they got money on a start of version and then money going to drop , so in 1 max 2 year game will be totaly dead , so what is better , bring people back with a less money take , proportionally , 10k players buying dcs (1 big version ) , better then 300 players per version (6 version) = 1800 , just dont tell me , are you crazy there are more players , we all knows that are all dupes or teamviewer players ...thats are fact for one way or otherwise game will shut down in next 1 year or max 2 ...
Oh and btw Messina will never ever leave Gravano. But thats Messina! I dont know wich fam you mean who left in the name of messina this version gravano.
Anonymous (14:09:34 - 09-04)
Anonymous at 13:34:51 on 09/04:
messina will be in the middle of two sides, if gravano comes big they will join their side. they can win next version with this tactic. maraz will be used in this purpose as always
Anonymous at 11:26:58 on 09/04:
messina sucking maraz dick cuz they know next version lucch. side is coming big?
go on nice tactic. use maraz while u can
PannaJunk at 11:09:35 on 09/04:
Well if we must believe all the comments here over and over again no one ever one a version and the old days were always better.
stop the bullshit, if no one won then your 'great' families who were so noble and strong would still be up.
Well if we must believe all the comments here over and over again no one ever one a version and the old days were always better.
stop the bullshit, if no one won then your 'great' families who were so noble and strong would still be up.
messina sucking maraz dick cuz they know next version lucch. side is coming big?
go on nice tactic. use maraz while u can
messina will be in the middle of two sides, if gravano comes big they will join their side. they can win next version with this tactic. maraz will be used in this purpose as always
I dont understand the messina part this version ? were they up ? why did i miss that ? I always join messina when they are up so kinda childish they made it without me :/
Im just chilling in umbrella because morgash wanted to make his own family this version. I must warn Drima vero and arcanine because they also missed the whole messina family thingie this version....
Im just chilling in umbrella because morgash wanted to make his own family this version. I must warn Drima vero and arcanine because they also missed the whole messina family thingie this version....
Anonymous (13:34:51 - 09-04)
Anonymous at 11:26:58 on 09/04:
messina sucking maraz dick cuz they know next version lucch. side is coming big?
go on nice tactic. use maraz while u can
PannaJunk at 11:09:35 on 09/04:
Well if we must believe all the comments here over and over again no one ever one a version and the old days were always better.
stop the bullshit, if no one won then your 'great' families who were so noble and strong would still be up.
Well if we must believe all the comments here over and over again no one ever one a version and the old days were always better.
stop the bullshit, if no one won then your 'great' families who were so noble and strong would still be up.
messina sucking maraz dick cuz they know next version lucch. side is coming big?
go on nice tactic. use maraz while u can
messina will be in the middle of two sides, if gravano comes big they will join their side. they can win next version with this tactic. maraz will be used in this purpose as always
PannaJunk at 11:59:58 on 09/04:
for you and Moesasji, I talked about every vers not only last vers. Do not read what you wanna read.
Anonymous at 11:43:25 on 09/04:
A version that's riddled with bugs and that's quit by admins somewhere halfway through can't have a winner. There's a reason why admins didn't hand out any stars there. Of course, admins are the evil guys here, they can't do any good after all.
The main thing is to distinguish between no winner and no clear winner. In many versions it is debatable who won - that's not the point -, but last version simply can't possibly have a winner, due to the way it went and was put to an end.
PannaJunk at 11:09:35 on 09/04:
Well if we must believe all the comments here over and over again no one ever one a version and the old days were always better.
stop the bullshit, if no one won then your 'great' families who were so noble and strong would still be up.
Moesasji at 11:05:21 on 09/04:
No one won last version
Anonymous at 09:10:37 on 09/04:
Marazzino won last vers and again this vers they win, because they are old family and they have a lot of members. respect _o_
Marazzino won last vers and again this vers they win, because they are old family and they have a lot of members. respect _o_
No one won last version
Well if we must believe all the comments here over and over again no one ever one a version and the old days were always better.
stop the bullshit, if no one won then your 'great' families who were so noble and strong would still be up.
A version that's riddled with bugs and that's quit by admins somewhere halfway through can't have a winner. There's a reason why admins didn't hand out any stars there. Of course, admins are the evil guys here, they can't do any good after all.
The main thing is to distinguish between no winner and no clear winner. In many versions it is debatable who won - that's not the point -, but last version simply can't possibly have a winner, due to the way it went and was put to an end.
for you and Moesasji, I talked about every vers not only last vers. Do not read what you wanna read.
Anonymous at 11:43:25 on 09/04:
A version that's riddled with bugs and that's quit by admins somewhere halfway through can't have a winner. There's a reason why admins didn't hand out any stars there. Of course, admins are the evil guys here, they can't do any good after all.
The main thing is to distinguish between no winner and no clear winner. In many versions it is debatable who won - that's not the point -, but last version simply can't possibly have a winner, due to the way it went and was put to an end.
PannaJunk at 11:09:35 on 09/04:
Well if we must believe all the comments here over and over again no one ever one a version and the old days were always better.
stop the bullshit, if no one won then your 'great' families who were so noble and strong would still be up.
Moesasji at 11:05:21 on 09/04:
No one won last version
Anonymous at 09:10:37 on 09/04:
Marazzino won last vers and again this vers they win, because they are old family and they have a lot of members. respect _o_
Marazzino won last vers and again this vers they win, because they are old family and they have a lot of members. respect _o_
No one won last version
Well if we must believe all the comments here over and over again no one ever one a version and the old days were always better.
stop the bullshit, if no one won then your 'great' families who were so noble and strong would still be up.
A version that's riddled with bugs and that's quit by admins somewhere halfway through can't have a winner. There's a reason why admins didn't hand out any stars there. Of course, admins are the evil guys here, they can't do any good after all.
The main thing is to distinguish between no winner and no clear winner. In many versions it is debatable who won - that's not the point -, but last version simply can't possibly have a winner, due to the way it went and was put to an end.
for you and Moesasji, I talked about every vers not only last vers. Do not read what you wanna read.
Anonymous (11:46:44 - 09-04)
Anonymous at 11:43:25 on 09/04:
A version that's riddled with bugs and that's quit by admins somewhere halfway through can't have a winner. There's a reason why admins didn't hand out any stars there. Of course, admins are the evil guys here, they can't do any good after all.
The main thing is to distinguish between no winner and no clear winner. In many versions it is debatable who won - that's not the point -, but last version simply can't possibly have a winner, due to the way it went and was put to an end.
PannaJunk at 11:09:35 on 09/04:
Well if we must believe all the comments here over and over again no one ever one a version and the old days were always better.
stop the bullshit, if no one won then your 'great' families who were so noble and strong would still be up.
Moesasji at 11:05:21 on 09/04:
No one won last version
Anonymous at 09:10:37 on 09/04:
Marazzino won last vers and again this vers they win, because they are old family and they have a lot of members. respect _o_
Marazzino won last vers and again this vers they win, because they are old family and they have a lot of members. respect _o_
No one won last version
Well if we must believe all the comments here over and over again no one ever one a version and the old days were always better.
stop the bullshit, if no one won then your 'great' families who were so noble and strong would still be up.
A version that's riddled with bugs and that's quit by admins somewhere halfway through can't have a winner. There's a reason why admins didn't hand out any stars there. Of course, admins are the evil guys here, they can't do any good after all.
The main thing is to distinguish between no winner and no clear winner. In many versions it is debatable who won - that's not the point -, but last version simply can't possibly have a winner, due to the way it went and was put to an end.
Maraz won my dick and messina next vers play maraz they lost special blood they know :)
Anonymous (11:43:25 - 09-04)
PannaJunk at 11:09:35 on 09/04:
Well if we must believe all the comments here over and over again no one ever one a version and the old days were always better.
stop the bullshit, if no one won then your 'great' families who were so noble and strong would still be up.
Moesasji at 11:05:21 on 09/04:
No one won last version
Anonymous at 09:10:37 on 09/04:
Marazzino won last vers and again this vers they win, because they are old family and they have a lot of members. respect _o_
Marazzino won last vers and again this vers they win, because they are old family and they have a lot of members. respect _o_
No one won last version
Well if we must believe all the comments here over and over again no one ever one a version and the old days were always better.
stop the bullshit, if no one won then your 'great' families who were so noble and strong would still be up.
A version that's riddled with bugs and that's quit by admins somewhere halfway through can't have a winner. There's a reason why admins didn't hand out any stars there. Of course, admins are the evil guys here, they can't do any good after all.
The main thing is to distinguish between no winner and no clear winner. In many versions it is debatable who won - that's not the point -, but last version simply can't possibly have a winner, due to the way it went and was put to an end.
PannaJunk at 11:09:35 on 09/04:
Well if we must believe all the comments here over and over again no one ever one a version and the old days were always better.
stop the bullshit, if no one won then your 'great' families who were so noble and strong would still be up.
Moesasji at 11:05:21 on 09/04:
No one won last version
Anonymous at 09:10:37 on 09/04:
Marazzino won last vers and again this vers they win, because they are old family and they have a lot of members. respect _o_
Marazzino won last vers and again this vers they win, because they are old family and they have a lot of members. respect _o_
No one won last version
Well if we must believe all the comments here over and over again no one ever one a version and the old days were always better.
stop the bullshit, if no one won then your 'great' families who were so noble and strong would still be up.
Anonymous (11:33:44 - 09-04)
Tempes + Gambino vs Umbrella tonight...
for the revenge of Santu...
for the revenge of Santu...
Damn another turk fam will get voucher after pentagram and leviticus
Who cares, they are pretty much useless after lackeys build the accounts(1-2 weeks lc/cheif+)nowadays. Yes I do know that for a fact. You can ask any of the tops who have earned them.