» Menu
» OB/Site News
» Articles
 |
» Barafranca News
No news found. Reset in progress?
» Comments of ReBorN
24-06 Fam. limit
21:05:26 - 24-06
The limit was initially 16 but they realized that was not enough for .com so it has now been increased to 23.
24-06 Fam. limit
19:00:49 - 24-06
« Kailyn » ReBorN we have not information about limit now... i only can say that you need to wait
« Kailyn » we will say something to the players later
« Kailyn » ReBorN i dont know if we will say something tonight
« Kailyn » or tomorrow
« ReBorN » didnt the admins (a couple of versions ago) say they would never make major changes again without informing the players?
« Kailyn » ReBorN i will talk to someone else later
« ReBorN » im coming back everyday until there is a news post
« ReBorN » tomorrow ill be coming back every hour actually
« ReBorN » because this is irresponsible
« ReBorN » tell brando to get his ass online and take care of his subjects
« ReBorN » throw us a piece of bread please master!
« ReBorN » ill kindly pay him for a DC today for a news post tomorrow!
This was from yesterday when the rumors started. She initially said there would be a news post in "a few days". Rofl
« Kailyn » we will say something to the players later
« Kailyn » ReBorN i dont know if we will say something tonight
« Kailyn » or tomorrow
« ReBorN » didnt the admins (a couple of versions ago) say they would never make major changes again without informing the players?
« Kailyn » ReBorN i will talk to someone else later
« ReBorN » im coming back everyday until there is a news post
« ReBorN » tomorrow ill be coming back every hour actually
« ReBorN » because this is irresponsible
« ReBorN » tell brando to get his ass online and take care of his subjects
« ReBorN » throw us a piece of bread please master!
« ReBorN » ill kindly pay him for a DC today for a news post tomorrow!
This was from yesterday when the rumors started. She initially said there would be a news post in "a few days". Rofl
24-06 Fam. limit
17:59:13 - 24-06
It is unbelievable to me that they can make such a radical change like this without consulting the players. But whats even more shocking to me is that they make such a change and dont even notify the players. Just another slap in the face.
Since there are 14 families up now, can anyone confirm that the actual number is 14?
Since there are 14 families up now, can anyone confirm that the actual number is 14?
23-06 First family down!
11:59:30 - 24-06
zenga at 11:50:44 on 24/06:
I have a little bit experience with multiple accounts, and no one is gonna tell me that all the suicides from the past days are genuine rankers. Who's behind it? No fucking clue.
But it's once more clear that the 1 account limit per person is the most retarded rule they try to enforce now for years without success. And for what? The game would be way more fun if 1 player could get as many accounts as he / she wants.
I have a little bit experience with multiple accounts, and no one is gonna tell me that all the suicides from the past days are genuine rankers. Who's behind it? No fucking clue.
But it's once more clear that the 1 account limit per person is the most retarded rule they try to enforce now for years without success. And for what? The game would be way more fun if 1 player could get as many accounts as he / she wants.
I used to disagree with that view point, but I have changed my mind recently. I always thought it would put paying members with alot of money at a disadvantage. However, I think as long as you enforce the rule of not being allow to transfer money and HPs between accounts, I dont see the reason not to allow it.
Logically, if you rank multiple accounts manually, it will slow you down and all the accounts will suffer. If you lackey all the accounts (depending on how many you have of course) it could cost you a small fortune. Either way, both have draw backs. But I agree, the added fun of having multiple accounts would make it worth it. And not to mention that people would get less discouraged if their account died and would keep on playing.
23-06 First fam up!
14:16:39 - 23-06
Good job, nice ranking :)
General Comments & Major Rumors
19:52:38 - 19-06
Anonymous at 19:25:36 on 19/06:
Horrible idea
-1
Anonymous at 17:00:29 on 19/06:
and by even if profit goes to 450m they still sit with 15m in bank. i mean $15m in pocket - bank the rest of the profit.
Anonymous at 16:58:31 on 19/06:
Imo with these objects they should have a set amount in their pocket no matter what is lost @ the object. Say $15m, even if profit goes to 450m they still sit with 15m in bank. Once ALL the casinos are won to players - they create new randomly named accounts n start giving hints to their in games, players have to figure out the clues & shoot the account to win back a share of what was taken as profit by the tables.
Imo with these objects they should have a set amount in their pocket no matter what is lost @ the object. Say $15m, even if profit goes to 450m they still sit with 15m in bank. Once ALL the casinos are won to players - they create new randomly named accounts n start giving hints to their in games, players have to figure out the clues & shoot the account to win back a share of what was taken as profit by the tables.
and by even if profit goes to 450m they still sit with 15m in bank. i mean $15m in pocket - bank the rest of the profit.
Horrible idea
-1
+1
If I wanted that, Id play www.treasurehunters.com
08-06 Reset announced!
14:14:10 - 08-06
eviL at 14:06:25 on 08/06:
gg
gg
+1
General Comments & Major Rumors
13:01:42 - 08-06
Asabi at 12:18:13 on 08/06:
sorry but i couldnt see a turk pact and i guess you all mr anonymous didnt see last vers :p
PannaJunk at 06:38:05 on 08/06:
+1 thats how earlier versions were all the time
Anonymous at 04:59:02 on 08/06:
O
Only problem is, when turks win the first war, the version will get boring due to their Pact not shooting eachother
O
Amproof at 00:17:06 on 08/06:
This new KA has been awesome really, I think next version will be even better, idk, I enjoyed this version more than I have the previous three or four.
Anonymous at 21:38:41 on 07/06:
It's because the Turks have just a big a pact as the other side. The only difference is that the turks try to blame it on the other side so they have a bad excuse to stick together.
If they started playing tactically instead of trying to win one war and then dominate the version then the game would get way more interesting again.
Anonymous at 21:35:33 on 07/06:
Now thats the funniest things Ive heard all day. What else do you call a group of players that always teams up together to shoot down one specific side? Whats the difference between these guys and the other "pact"? ... oh, thats right, after they kill the turk pact, they actually keep playing and shoot each other ... thats the difference :p
This version actually got pretty nice after the Turk pact died. People finaly shooting without mass pacts. Big families shooting at eachother etc. Even saw some 1on1s
Anonymous at 19:11:20 on 07/06:
I used to feel excited for a new version..
Now i don't care..
Yawn
Anonymous at 16:55:12 on 07/06:
spidersence
Anonymous at 16:06:13 on 07/06:
dude... I can totally feel a reset coming
dude... I can totally feel a reset coming
I used to feel excited for a new version..
Now i don't care..
Yawn
Now thats the funniest things Ive heard all day. What else do you call a group of players that always teams up together to shoot down one specific side? Whats the difference between these guys and the other "pact"? ... oh, thats right, after they kill the turk pact, they actually keep playing and shoot each other ... thats the difference :p
This version actually got pretty nice after the Turk pact died. People finaly shooting without mass pacts. Big families shooting at eachother etc. Even saw some 1on1s
It's because the Turks have just a big a pact as the other side. The only difference is that the turks try to blame it on the other side so they have a bad excuse to stick together.
If they started playing tactically instead of trying to win one war and then dominate the version then the game would get way more interesting again.
Only problem is, when turks win the first war, the version will get boring due to their Pact not shooting eachother
+1 thats how earlier versions were all the time
sorry but i couldnt see a turk pact and i guess you all mr anonymous didnt see last vers :p
08-06 Flaming
12:31:03 - 08-06
zenga at 12:24:33 on 08/06:
Auto deleting downvoted comments will cause forum pvp: people will ask friends to remove good comments that reveal truth or place them in a bad spotlight. I like what wowhead.com does: if a post gets downvoted it collapses, but you still have the option by clicking it to make it visible and read what the idiot poster had to say.
For example: http://www.wowhead.com/item=1728#comments
If you scroll down a bit you can see posts just containing the poster name & date, since they received too many dislikes. By simply clicking it you get to read the post.
The big advantage is that people get to read the whole story rather than have to guess what the deleted post was about.
Auto deleting downvoted comments will cause forum pvp: people will ask friends to remove good comments that reveal truth or place them in a bad spotlight. I like what wowhead.com does: if a post gets downvoted it collapses, but you still have the option by clicking it to make it visible and read what the idiot poster had to say.
For example: http://www.wowhead.com/item=1728#comments
If you scroll down a bit you can see posts just containing the poster name & date, since they received too many dislikes. By simply clicking it you get to read the post.
The big advantage is that people get to read the whole story rather than have to guess what the deleted post was about.
Thats basically what I was going to suggest.
If the post has 10 dislikes AND more dislikes then likes, then just hide the post (but still make it viewable if someone wants). In addition, if it gets X amount of dislikes, or a certain percentage of dislikes over likes, then a Mod gets notified to look at the possibility of deleting it.
General Comments & Major Rumors
21:18:30 - 02-06
Redspeert at 21:06:27 on 02/06:
Pretty sure C&C won this version.
bandido at 20:38:28 on 02/06:
(K)
Anonymous at 15:30:13 on 02/06:
Marangello won this version.
Marangello won this version.
Pretty sure C&C won this version.
Nah, my vote is for NA (Northern Alliance)
General Comments & Major Rumors
15:32:51 - 02-06
I think Turkuz won this version
General Comments & Major Rumors
20:33:38 - 30-05
Anonymous at 20:17:38 on 30/05:
+1
Anonymous at 19:22:17 on 30/05:
well, next version the same pact wont be there at least...
since Righ fucked up Liberta, Pres/Gravano (Armada) and Vinci, those fams will never allow Righelli to be as strong as they are now. I wouldnt even be suprised to see those 3 fams up united and shoot Righelli even this version, just to settle up the mess Righelli made last weeks.
Affinitas will never let Righelli play like they did this version anymore. The only fam not benefitting from it is Conflict, since they are the connection between those 2 sides.
I wouldn't even be suprised that Affi/Conflict have a non shooting pact, but go their own ways next version.
And then u got your 3rd party again (Righ/Bru/Tempe part) and stop wanking about huge pacts.
But u'll see some other nuubs will make another 'Pact' and we all start wanking again :')
well, next version the same pact wont be there at least...
since Righ fucked up Liberta, Pres/Gravano (Armada) and Vinci, those fams will never allow Righelli to be as strong as they are now. I wouldnt even be suprised to see those 3 fams up united and shoot Righelli even this version, just to settle up the mess Righelli made last weeks.
Affinitas will never let Righelli play like they did this version anymore. The only fam not benefitting from it is Conflict, since they are the connection between those 2 sides.
I wouldn't even be suprised that Affi/Conflict have a non shooting pact, but go their own ways next version.
And then u got your 3rd party again (Righ/Bru/Tempe part) and stop wanking about huge pacts.
But u'll see some other nuubs will make another 'Pact' and we all start wanking again :')
+1
Thats it ... just hang all your hopes and dreams on that there will be a reset in 1 week and MAYBE there wont be a "pact". I wouldnt count on either.
General Comments & Major Rumors
19:11:06 - 30-05
Anonymous at 19:02:02 on 30/05:
Probably the same doctor that gave you a lollipop, if you never tell your parents, or the police...
Seriously cut the bullshit. Hacker admitted the pact infact existed. ANd I forgot in your world, there also was no ddos...
Probably you will even deny that Righelli - Conflict - Vinci - Liberta - Messina/Marangello/Vaffanculo (sorry I don't know how to call them). Finished last version together peacefully. :')
Whatever your childhood doctor gave you to forget, please share your meds with us.
ReBorN at 18:43:30 on 30/05:
Im starting to feel bad for these guys :\
Its like going to a doctor when your 10 years old. He says "Your going to die one day, everyone does." so the little boy decides to stop living. :\
Dont give up!
Sollid at 18:39:49 on 30/05:
You all should just stop and try to tell people there is no pact. Just let them believe there is one. Since that'll mean they won't try tactical wars, but just grab a bunch of families of the so called pact and shoot and die by the bloods of those families :P You guys are telling them to shoot tactical so they make a chance, why are you helping them? xD
You all should just stop and try to tell people there is no pact. Just let them believe there is one. Since that'll mean they won't try tactical wars, but just grab a bunch of families of the so called pact and shoot and die by the bloods of those families :P You guys are telling them to shoot tactical so they make a chance, why are you helping them? xD
Im starting to feel bad for these guys :\
Its like going to a doctor when your 10 years old. He says "Your going to die one day, everyone does." so the little boy decides to stop living. :\
Dont give up!
Probably the same doctor that gave you a lollipop, if you never tell your parents, or the police...
Seriously cut the bullshit. Hacker admitted the pact infact existed. ANd I forgot in your world, there also was no ddos...
Probably you will even deny that Righelli - Conflict - Vinci - Liberta - Messina/Marangello/Vaffanculo (sorry I don't know how to call them). Finished last version together peacefully. :')
Whatever your childhood doctor gave you to forget, please share your meds with us.
ROFL ... again ... STOP .... CRYING ...
Who cares if Hacker admits theres a pact or not? Who cares if there IS a pact? Who cares what the price of tea in China is?! It makes no difference! You guys think there is this HUGE conspiracy to keep one side down and finish the version with 72 families when in reality, these bloodships were formed out of necessity because of opportunistic families that would strike only after the big families killed each other off. (Which, is a legitimate way to play, dont get me wrong, but so is working closely with your bloods).
The whole point Ive been trying to make all day (and everyone keeps missing it surprisingly [/sarcasm]) is that if the families that had died in the beginning kept playing, the "pact" wouldnt be alive right now. Even if you launched one of your infamous unorganized wars, Conflict, Righelli, and Lucchese would all be down right now.
But thats ok ... keep playing like this and the "pact" will keep putting stars on their profiles.
Im done ... c ya :w
General Comments & Major Rumors
18:43:30 - 30-05
Sollid at 18:39:49 on 30/05:
You all should just stop and try to tell people there is no pact. Just let them believe there is one. Since that'll mean they won't try tactical wars, but just grab a bunch of families of the so called pact and shoot and die by the bloods of those families :P You guys are telling them to shoot tactical so they make a chance, why are you helping them? xD
You all should just stop and try to tell people there is no pact. Just let them believe there is one. Since that'll mean they won't try tactical wars, but just grab a bunch of families of the so called pact and shoot and die by the bloods of those families :P You guys are telling them to shoot tactical so they make a chance, why are you helping them? xD
Im starting to feel bad for these guys :\
Its like going to a doctor when your 10 years old. He says "Your going to die one day, everyone does." so the little boy decides to stop living. :\
Dont give up!
General Comments & Major Rumors
18:40:45 - 30-05
Anonymous at 18:38:29 on 30/05:
once again...I didn't even play this version nor I intend to play next...I'm just saying that this playstyle sucks. No strategy needed whatsoever...no tops needed when everybody knows what will happen. I find that boring...
Mikee at 18:32:54 on 30/05:
Reborn, when will you finally realize these discussions are useless and hopeless... this is like explaining a 1 year old boy how to whipe his ass..
impossible with such failzors
Reborn, when will you finally realize these discussions are useless and hopeless... this is like explaining a 1 year old boy how to whipe his ass..
impossible with such failzors
once again...I didn't even play this version nor I intend to play next...I'm just saying that this playstyle sucks. No strategy needed whatsoever...no tops needed when everybody knows what will happen. I find that boring...
Then play the game and come up with a new style that can counter this one. That is the brilliance behind this game (sometimes) ... the politics and the strategizing. ;)
And idd Mikee ... it is. I just wanted my opinion known (and Im bored at work today, so what better to do then to argue on OB News? xD)
General Comments & Major Rumors
18:38:29 - 30-05
Anonymous at 18:29:23 on 30/05:
it's clearly your side responsible...without your pact other fams would never team up together.
if your side lost 1st battle some fams would probably retire like in 3.2...conflict went down very early...didn't come back...vinci went down, didn't come back...and still I don't see point in playing this game like this...one side or other side wins...bah...it's not worth playing at all. Reranking? waste of money...that would make only brando happy...
ReBorN at 18:19:40 on 30/05:
I keep hearing this "40%" number running around and it got me wondering how accurate that was. So I looked on trabot and put together some statistics from the day before the first big war:
I was surprised to find that the "40%" was very close ... but not correct.
Total alive:
776 Bruglione's
693 Chief's
373 Local Chief's
Main families of the "pact":
271 Bruglione's (34.92%)
208 Chief's (30.01%)
100 Local Chief's (26.80%)
Even if you include all the Bloods of the "pact" families that have shot for the "pact" at one point or another, you get these numbers:
316 Bruglione's (40.72%)
240 Chief's (34.63%)
124 Local Chief's (33.24%)
Total number of high ranks (LC+) just in the main "pact":
579 LC+ (31.43%)
Total number including Bloods:
680 LC+ (36.91%)
Now, if there are two sides, who is the other side? I figured a good place to start would be the attacking families from the first major war. Here are their statistics:
326 Bruglione's (42.01%)
284 Chief's (40.98%)
182 Local Chief's (48.79%)
Total number of LC+:
792 LC+ (42.99%)
So which side is responsible for this again?
I did not write my initial comments to put blame on anyone. I am simply trying to point out that if people would just keep playing this game no matter if they are Bruglione or Thief that you can turn the tide with a little bit of determination and hard work. I can tell you that if my side goes down, I wont give up that easy and simply wait for a reset.
At no point did I say I was bored. On the contrary it has been very exciting the past couple of days and I think there is still come excitement to come. Im was just simply trying to give a pep-talk to the other side. :p
I keep hearing this "40%" number running around and it got me wondering how accurate that was. So I looked on trabot and put together some statistics from the day before the first big war:
I was surprised to find that the "40%" was very close ... but not correct.
Total alive:
776 Bruglione's
693 Chief's
373 Local Chief's
Main families of the "pact":
271 Bruglione's (34.92%)
208 Chief's (30.01%)
100 Local Chief's (26.80%)
Even if you include all the Bloods of the "pact" families that have shot for the "pact" at one point or another, you get these numbers:
316 Bruglione's (40.72%)
240 Chief's (34.63%)
124 Local Chief's (33.24%)
Total number of high ranks (LC+) just in the main "pact":
579 LC+ (31.43%)
Total number including Bloods:
680 LC+ (36.91%)
Now, if there are two sides, who is the other side? I figured a good place to start would be the attacking families from the first major war. Here are their statistics:
326 Bruglione's (42.01%)
284 Chief's (40.98%)
182 Local Chief's (48.79%)
Total number of LC+:
792 LC+ (42.99%)
So which side is responsible for this again?
I did not write my initial comments to put blame on anyone. I am simply trying to point out that if people would just keep playing this game no matter if they are Bruglione or Thief that you can turn the tide with a little bit of determination and hard work. I can tell you that if my side goes down, I wont give up that easy and simply wait for a reset.
At no point did I say I was bored. On the contrary it has been very exciting the past couple of days and I think there is still come excitement to come. Im was just simply trying to give a pep-talk to the other side. :p
it's clearly your side responsible...without your pact other fams would never team up together.
if your side lost 1st battle some fams would probably retire like in 3.2...conflict went down very early...didn't come back...vinci went down, didn't come back...and still I don't see point in playing this game like this...one side or other side wins...bah...it's not worth playing at all. Reranking? waste of money...that would make only brando happy...
On the contrary ... the families that are in the pact now have been fighting each other since before Brando even started fighting scripts! It wasnt until the "other side" started teaming up that these guys started working together.
Someone said it best earlier ...
All these families used to fight each other constantly. For example, when Conflict was weak from killing Affinitas, a group of families would swoop in (after months of doing nothing), kill Conflict, then claim victory for themselves. It happened a couple of versions in a row. After such lame tactics, these guys just didnt want to see that happen anymore.
But, like I said earlier, pacts go all the way back since the inception of this game. Until EVERYONE (not just "our side") changes their gamestyle, it will never change.
General Comments & Major Rumors
18:19:40 - 30-05
I keep hearing this "40%" number running around and it got me wondering how accurate that was. So I looked on trabot and put together some statistics from the day before the first big war:
I was surprised to find that the "40%" was very close ... but not correct.
Total alive:
776 Bruglione's
693 Chief's
373 Local Chief's
Main families of the "pact":
271 Bruglione's (34.92%)
208 Chief's (30.01%)
100 Local Chief's (26.80%)
Even if you include all the Bloods of the "pact" families that have shot for the "pact" at one point or another, you get these numbers:
316 Bruglione's (40.72%)
240 Chief's (34.63%)
124 Local Chief's (33.24%)
Total number of high ranks (LC+) just in the main "pact":
579 LC+ (31.43%)
Total number including Bloods:
680 LC+ (36.91%)
Now, if there are two sides, who is the other side? I figured a good place to start would be the attacking families from the first major war. Here are their statistics:
326 Bruglione's (42.01%)
284 Chief's (40.98%)
182 Local Chief's (48.79%)
Total number of LC+:
792 LC+ (42.99%)
So which side is responsible for this again?
What if you decided to attack just Affinitas with those numbers? What if you decided to attack just Supremazia with those numbers?
Some of our strategies are pretty obvious although I wont spell them out for you. There were a couple of times this version we had to come up with different ways to get certain families down. People need to think outside of the box a bit instead of just insisting all families must be down at the exact same time!
I did not write my initial comments to put blame on anyone. I am simply trying to point out that if people would just keep playing this game no matter if they are Bruglione or Thief that you can turn the tide with a little bit of determination and hard work. I can tell you that if my side goes down, I wont give up that easy and simply wait for a reset.
At no point did I say I was bored. On the contrary it has been very exciting the past couple of days and I think there is still come excitement to come. Im was just simply trying to give a pep-talk to the other side. :p
I was surprised to find that the "40%" was very close ... but not correct.
Total alive:
776 Bruglione's
693 Chief's
373 Local Chief's
Main families of the "pact":
271 Bruglione's (34.92%)
208 Chief's (30.01%)
100 Local Chief's (26.80%)
Even if you include all the Bloods of the "pact" families that have shot for the "pact" at one point or another, you get these numbers:
316 Bruglione's (40.72%)
240 Chief's (34.63%)
124 Local Chief's (33.24%)
Total number of high ranks (LC+) just in the main "pact":
579 LC+ (31.43%)
Total number including Bloods:
680 LC+ (36.91%)
Now, if there are two sides, who is the other side? I figured a good place to start would be the attacking families from the first major war. Here are their statistics:
326 Bruglione's (42.01%)
284 Chief's (40.98%)
182 Local Chief's (48.79%)
Total number of LC+:
792 LC+ (42.99%)
So which side is responsible for this again?
What if you decided to attack just Affinitas with those numbers? What if you decided to attack just Supremazia with those numbers?
Some of our strategies are pretty obvious although I wont spell them out for you. There were a couple of times this version we had to come up with different ways to get certain families down. People need to think outside of the box a bit instead of just insisting all families must be down at the exact same time!
I did not write my initial comments to put blame on anyone. I am simply trying to point out that if people would just keep playing this game no matter if they are Bruglione or Thief that you can turn the tide with a little bit of determination and hard work. I can tell you that if my side goes down, I wont give up that easy and simply wait for a reset.
At no point did I say I was bored. On the contrary it has been very exciting the past couple of days and I think there is still come excitement to come. Im was just simply trying to give a pep-talk to the other side. :p
General Comments & Major Rumors
17:08:21 - 30-05
Anonymous at 17:03:36 on 30/05:
why bother to come back? some fams tried, but they were shot down quickly. maybe they should rank up to see another ddos attack?...you made this 2 sided...and I don't wanna play this way cause it's all predictable. rank up...big shootout...one side wins...end of the version. it's like playing texas hold'em where all go all-in in the first hand...few minutes of thrill and that's it.
ReBorN at 16:43:18 on 30/05:
And my point is ... what if they did come back? Would Conflict, Righelli, Lucchese be up right now? If so, for how many more days?
yamaguchi at 16:28:18 on 30/05:
mr. reborn After DDos attack why people rank again? they lost hopes after 1st attack and noone came back seriously.. if that wouldnt happen you werent exist thats true, but u cannot wait people come back after that , and if you have trustable bloods standing you try to come back also, like lucc,messina,vinci did..
shortly : Pact didnt lose control of game since start, so noone came back thats it, sadly you cannot see it, i thought u know something about game, keep following conflict otherwise you die very fast
mr. reborn After DDos attack why people rank again? they lost hopes after 1st attack and noone came back seriously.. if that wouldnt happen you werent exist thats true, but u cannot wait people come back after that , and if you have trustable bloods standing you try to come back also, like lucc,messina,vinci did..
shortly : Pact didnt lose control of game since start, so noone came back thats it, sadly you cannot see it, i thought u know something about game, keep following conflict otherwise you die very fast
And my point is ... what if they did come back? Would Conflict, Righelli, Lucchese be up right now? If so, for how many more days?
why bother to come back? some fams tried, but they were shot down quickly. maybe they should rank up to see another ddos attack?...you made this 2 sided...and I don't wanna play this way cause it's all predictable. rank up...big shootout...one side wins...end of the version. it's like playing texas hold'em where all go all-in in the first hand...few minutes of thrill and that's it.
"big shootout...one side wins...end of the version."
And thats the point, it doesnt have to be like that.
General Comments & Major Rumors
16:43:18 - 30-05
yamaguchi at 16:28:18 on 30/05:
mr. reborn After DDos attack why people rank again? they lost hopes after 1st attack and noone came back seriously.. if that wouldnt happen you werent exist thats true, but u cannot wait people come back after that , and if you have trustable bloods standing you try to come back also, like lucc,messina,vinci did..
shortly : Pact didnt lose control of game since start, so noone came back thats it, sadly you cannot see it, i thought u know something about game, keep following conflict otherwise you die very fast
mr. reborn After DDos attack why people rank again? they lost hopes after 1st attack and noone came back seriously.. if that wouldnt happen you werent exist thats true, but u cannot wait people come back after that , and if you have trustable bloods standing you try to come back also, like lucc,messina,vinci did..
shortly : Pact didnt lose control of game since start, so noone came back thats it, sadly you cannot see it, i thought u know something about game, keep following conflict otherwise you die very fast
And my point is ... what if they did come back? Would Conflict, Righelli, Lucchese be up right now? If so, for how many more days?
General Comments & Major Rumors
16:07:58 - 30-05
Anonymous at 15:59:17 on 30/05:
why pact policy wouldn't be changed? it's up to tops and fams... this way what's use of fams and tops when they can't influence the game or play their own game?
why to play this game when income is already known? this gangbang shit is like I would play basketball against some 7 yo kid and would be happy cause I pwned him. I don't find that's fun...
ReBorN at 15:07:40 on 30/05:
You people are unbelievable. You get beat so all you do is bitch, moan, and give up. If the tables were turned and the other pact would have won the first war and Conflict+ would have given up (which they wouldnt have) would you still have the same mentality? Of course not! Youd be saying the same thing ... rank back up!
Here is a little fact for you, if the people who died in the first war would have ranked back up from the start instead of taking their toys and going home like a 4 year old, Conflict, Bruinsma, and Righelli would not be the top families right now.
Do you expect to always be able to knock down a wall with one big swing of a hammer? No, you do it in multiple little swings, chipping away bit by bit.
Supremazia = Down
Affinitas = Down
Vincitori = Down
Armada = Down
Lucchese = Badly damaged
Conflict = Weak
Righelli = Weak
What more do you want?
I blame the admins for ALOT of bullshit thats happened in this game and I believe they share a small part of the responsibility for why the gameplay is the way it is atm (although the majority of the responsibility belongs to the players) however, this game is not meant to be a shootout to see who the winner will be leading to a reset in 2 months time. This game was never supposed to reset every couple of months. The original vision for this game was to be never ending where 1 family can be killed and then restart and kill the family that killed them. With this KA, that is possible.
But apparently you have 4 year olds that play this game. Everytime they die they throw temper tantrums and make excuses about why they failed. If you restart and make a new account, you can turn this direction of the game around. Of course its not as easy as it is when everyone has to start from scratch, but its not impossible!
The fact of the matter is, pacts will not go away. Theyve been getting bigger and bigger since this game was launched. There has ALWAYS been some kind of pact and now has grown to the size of 2 distinct sides. Lets be realistic here, even if the side of Conflict+ decides to play "on their own" and not support each other what will the other side do? Of course they will hit Conflict as soon as they can. Then what do the rest of the families do? Well, of course they would hit back because the probability that one of them would be next is 99.9%! And if it was the other way around, you can not tell me the other families would not do the same thing.
This is the day and age of the gangbang. You have to adapt and overcome. Dont get me wrong, I long for the days when wars were 1v1. THAT was fun! But the second Conflict does a 1v1 war, 7 other families will jump on them cause they are weak. And people do this all in the name of the all powerful omerta victory!
The bottom line is, things arent changing around here any time soon. If your going to whine and cry for reset every time you die then ffs just leave this game and dont come back because that mentality is more damaging then the gangbang wars.
And just for the record, a few versions ago, there was a certain pact that not only killed every family that was a threat (and never turned on each other) and then went as far as killing every family that allowed those who died to re-rank in their families as well as any famliless high rank. There was NO way to restart at all. So what did we do? Took to guerrilla warfare. We ranked in secret and hijacked as many of those families as we could ... and it was damn fun! So even under the most oppressive controlling families you can still make a difference and have some fun in the process.
With this KA, anything is possible ... take advantage of it.
Anonymous at 10:27:00 on 30/05:
Muahaha, ranking for what purpose? To get gangbanged by the non-existing 40%+ blood circle?
Sorry, if you feel bored. You guys created a blood circle that without retired players (on both sides) makes 40%+ of the accounts, now you play alone in your lil' sandbox and feel bored.
See you next version, when hopefully this big faggotry has come to an end.
Anonymous at 09:22:54 on 30/05:
Imo ranking speed is fine. What separates the great families from the good ones is the perseverance to continue ranking even after you die once.
Levi & Temp have come back, sure they arent hugely powerful but they have the ability in this ka to do some decent damage for their size.
Lucchese & Vinci & Liberta, both dead twice, both still ranking to come back.
But if u bitch n whine n complain n shout how ur all retired here every time u die it gets boring... n how exactly do u hope to achieve anything like that?
Living a whole version is good. Dying, coming back and still winning is a bigger achievement imo. And in this KA anything is possible, Kernek proved that.
Imo ranking speed is fine. What separates the great families from the good ones is the perseverance to continue ranking even after you die once.
Levi & Temp have come back, sure they arent hugely powerful but they have the ability in this ka to do some decent damage for their size.
Lucchese & Vinci & Liberta, both dead twice, both still ranking to come back.
But if u bitch n whine n complain n shout how ur all retired here every time u die it gets boring... n how exactly do u hope to achieve anything like that?
Living a whole version is good. Dying, coming back and still winning is a bigger achievement imo. And in this KA anything is possible, Kernek proved that.
Muahaha, ranking for what purpose? To get gangbanged by the non-existing 40%+ blood circle?
Sorry, if you feel bored. You guys created a blood circle that without retired players (on both sides) makes 40%+ of the accounts, now you play alone in your lil' sandbox and feel bored.
See you next version, when hopefully this big faggotry has come to an end.
You people are unbelievable. You get beat so all you do is bitch, moan, and give up. If the tables were turned and the other pact would have won the first war and Conflict+ would have given up (which they wouldnt have) would you still have the same mentality? Of course not! Youd be saying the same thing ... rank back up!
Here is a little fact for you, if the people who died in the first war would have ranked back up from the start instead of taking their toys and going home like a 4 year old, Conflict, Bruinsma, and Righelli would not be the top families right now.
Do you expect to always be able to knock down a wall with one big swing of a hammer? No, you do it in multiple little swings, chipping away bit by bit.
Supremazia = Down
Affinitas = Down
Vincitori = Down
Armada = Down
Lucchese = Badly damaged
Conflict = Weak
Righelli = Weak
What more do you want?
I blame the admins for ALOT of bullshit thats happened in this game and I believe they share a small part of the responsibility for why the gameplay is the way it is atm (although the majority of the responsibility belongs to the players) however, this game is not meant to be a shootout to see who the winner will be leading to a reset in 2 months time. This game was never supposed to reset every couple of months. The original vision for this game was to be never ending where 1 family can be killed and then restart and kill the family that killed them. With this KA, that is possible.
But apparently you have 4 year olds that play this game. Everytime they die they throw temper tantrums and make excuses about why they failed. If you restart and make a new account, you can turn this direction of the game around. Of course its not as easy as it is when everyone has to start from scratch, but its not impossible!
The fact of the matter is, pacts will not go away. Theyve been getting bigger and bigger since this game was launched. There has ALWAYS been some kind of pact and now has grown to the size of 2 distinct sides. Lets be realistic here, even if the side of Conflict+ decides to play "on their own" and not support each other what will the other side do? Of course they will hit Conflict as soon as they can. Then what do the rest of the families do? Well, of course they would hit back because the probability that one of them would be next is 99.9%! And if it was the other way around, you can not tell me the other families would not do the same thing.
This is the day and age of the gangbang. You have to adapt and overcome. Dont get me wrong, I long for the days when wars were 1v1. THAT was fun! But the second Conflict does a 1v1 war, 7 other families will jump on them cause they are weak. And people do this all in the name of the all powerful omerta victory!
The bottom line is, things arent changing around here any time soon. If your going to whine and cry for reset every time you die then ffs just leave this game and dont come back because that mentality is more damaging then the gangbang wars.
And just for the record, a few versions ago, there was a certain pact that not only killed every family that was a threat (and never turned on each other) and then went as far as killing every family that allowed those who died to re-rank in their families as well as any famliless high rank. There was NO way to restart at all. So what did we do? Took to guerrilla warfare. We ranked in secret and hijacked as many of those families as we could ... and it was damn fun! So even under the most oppressive controlling families you can still make a difference and have some fun in the process.
With this KA, anything is possible ... take advantage of it.
why pact policy wouldn't be changed? it's up to tops and fams... this way what's use of fams and tops when they can't influence the game or play their own game?
why to play this game when income is already known? this gangbang shit is like I would play basketball against some 7 yo kid and would be happy cause I pwned him. I don't find that's fun...
And what if you were the 7 year old kid? And after working your ass off, you beat the 18 year old kid? How would you feel then?
And until there is an agreement between both sides that these gangbangs wont happen anymore, I highly doubt either side would just hold their breath and wait to see if the other side would do the same.
You missed the entire point of my post ... if people wouldnt give up after the first big war, the version can be changed later on. You think "the pact" is as strong now with the loss of all those families? If you hadnt given up in the beginning, you would be in control now.