One of our bloods was at their side and next to that, I don't shoot bloods, or second-grade bloods when they are next to my bloods in a war.

I could have done nothing to help infragilis. I have been speaking with their tops about it and they don't blame us, in fact most of their people joined us, so we are cool. I always have had huge respect for infragilis and they helped me a lot.

One of their tops told me who shot on them, they were assraped by like 3 or 4 family's which were about their size or bigger, and they went down very quickly while most of them were asleep.

And eh, please register or use your own nick... you've seen that text part on my profile that says you have 3 choices? Appearently you choose the second: Fear me

;w

Your attempts:
Nick Time Status
Lysvik 27-08-2011 16:03:56 You killed Lysvik , he tried to hit back but did no damage
Fritzenator 27-08-2011 14:09:52 You killed Fritzenator , he hit back and did some damage
Marston 26-08-2011 16:29:13 You killed Marston , he tried to hit back but did no damage

I should get kudo's as well, put quitte some effort in getting my story on this site ^^

btw, registering is easy, show me who you are, I don't bite :')

Damn you caught me :<

Can anybody start a 1 man family, then we can take it down and I can make a top statement again :^

Damn, a typo... good you explain yourself that you were the one crying to infra and not us. :w

You have witnessed Harrypotter change the KA using a powerful spell, you can auction this witness statement with code: 1337

:^

jeez, my popcorn must have passed expiry date xD

I had a long conversation in #help with badeendje and he told me what happened.

This morning there was a newspost(I missed it) indeed. They had removed the rankcap but the problem was everyone over 300% was back at 300%(completely). They gonna try now to remove the rankcap without people losing rp.

He also claims devs told them 5 times today already that rankpoints are not included(didnt say anything about rp), so I guess when only rp was in KA if everybody would have been back at 300, that would make the higher progressed players a lot weaker than they would be normally.

Therefor roleback was performed.

So, in short, as far as I came aware KA is not different from what is was. I'm afraid it's just a well-organized war. RIP on both sides o/

I prefer this site over Trabot news site :)
I never give statements to them because nobody reads it...

I mean the thing about Safehousing, that's a hidden opinion because you dislike it. Ok with Gambino you were pretty right but still not objective, here you changed it... that's the only thing I mean

and if I preferedd trabot news I wouldn't be here, would I?

It's still a fail sbanks,

They never shot any bullet at Firenze+, their target was Anda from the beginning, so in fact Locker still got you there... just admit it :)

I like the warreports, but sometimes they should be a little more objective... your opinion is too clear in some situations(Never been against me, but even I think so)

Keep up the good work, and change the mistakes and misunderstandings :>

!Love

Thanks for that,

I wanna add, if any non-admin would know the KA without being a close friend, it would already be widespread news, meaning people would anticipate on it and the bf-kills would be less in ammount and the numbers of bullets wasted(in my opinion in some wars they do, comparing the bullet difference and the deathlist) would be less as well

Anyway, let;s get some action o/

but, but, I haz no moneyz for defqon :<

You are right, I don't know KA completely but I know a lot about it and as I explained it it's not wrong, it's only a small part...

and besides, nobody knows KA completely since they admins don't even want to tell whether it matters if you are capo or not(while we all know a capo is (only a) bit stronger than somebody who;s not capo

I don't think ka is offtopic subject... the current KA is the reason of the slow war, backfire kills etc and has to do with this war as well

Boats have to do something with it also, because if they people who got shot bought a boat at the market(it's hidden somewhere, written in harry potters invisible ink) so they could run instead of dieing! :>

Agreed, I made a typo but doesn't mean I don't understand it, I combined 2 thoughts in 1 explanation

1. When looking at bg stats the only bg stats included in if the attacker survives the backfire is the attackvalue of the target

2. When you look to the outcome of backfireshot it's mostly difference in rp, bulletammount and the attackvallue of the target

You reveiled it, i made a typo

Decibel next year then? :D

As I said your post makes me guess you don't understand the KA(killalgorithm = difficult calculation for the outcome of shootings!), not the maximum values

Yes, indeed people die a lot in backfire
Yes, maximum defense value and maximum attack value is very unbalanced

Those things only have nothing to do with each other... when you fear dieing in backfire you have to hope the target has very few attack or just not shoot, because defense only helps you staying alive when you get shot, what would happen if attack and defense would be more equal? It would be 100% suicide if the target had more attack than now because you can even shoot less bullets to be able to survive the backfire(as this is important for the target to be able to kill you in backfire)

you get it?>

I said mostly! Smartass :D

But the thing I was pointing at is that the people dieing in backfire shouldn't whine about the unbalanced maximumvalues of attack and defense, because targets having more defense has nothing to do with them not surving the backfire and I'm 100% right about that


cya at Defqon next year smul <3

I'm afraid you don't understand KA at all,

let me explain you:

Attack is important when you shoot and when you get shot, it decides how much dammage you do to your target or in backfire.

Defense is only important when you get shot and has nothing to do with the dammage you do to the other, when you get shot this value decides whether how much dammage the attacker does to you, when you are the attacker this value isn't even in the calculation, whether you survive the backfire or not depends completely on that stats(mostly bullets rp and attackvalue) of your target!

+ @ arcanine

They didn't change it ;)

Indeed still searching for rob and mia but as these 2 are each other opposites thats not a problem,

I don't just follow Brando's talks blindly I have been shooting in 3.0 and 3.2 and everything is the same..

offline stronger was same back then, but when lackeys came the percentage of active brugs really went down... most people are offline thats why you notice it at once, I think it's not fair to make people who are offline weaker then when online, people need to get some sleep as well.
It's unfair that the more you play(when ur account is tired for example) you are weaker, this way they stimulate to be offline as much as possible and make the game very inactive(together with lackeys)

I think they should remove the part of getting weaker for being tired and they should add strength to people who are online more often(online timer compared to overall time since they created the account), this way people who log off at night won't be weaker, but people who are only online when they are bored to death and only login when lackeys needed to be hired don't get stronger, what ya say?

KA hasn't changed since they introduced bodyguardtraining and removed ks ;) (3.0)

And you sir, yes you! Get yourself a dictionairy please

I'm Klementino and I'm richer than Sinterklaas :>

break... tonight more firework I hope :>