» Menu
» OB/Site News
» Articles
» Barafranca News
 |
|
article
Three high-ranks from Illusion have been taken down and with them their family.
Obviously the saburau, or in other words, Kurosawa - is responsible for their downfall.
This is also a reaction to Illusion shooting at Gravano in the previous war.
Obviously the saburau, or in other words, Kurosawa - is responsible for their downfall.
This is also a reaction to Illusion shooting at Gravano in the previous war.
statements
General|Yamamoto - Kurosawa top:
We shot at Illusion because we had to finish the job, they were suiciding at our sis fam in the big war
and now it was time for them to go down :)
Cappittoo - Illusion top:
After 7 years it was nice to bring illusion back again, due to long time break we did not wanted to jump in to anybodies vendetta. But when our long term blood righelli got shot we had no choise but shot back. Rip to all who died in this war
We shot at Illusion because we had to finish the job, they were suiciding at our sis fam in the big war
and now it was time for them to go down :)
Cappittoo - Illusion top:
After 7 years it was nice to bring illusion back again, due to long time break we did not wanted to jump in to anybodies vendetta. But when our long term blood righelli got shot we had no choise but shot back. Rip to all who died in this war
statistics
| War started on: 13:03:00 02-03-2013 | War ended on: 13:10:00 02-03-2013 |
| Bullet difference: -191,763 | War duration: 7m |
| Money difference: -$7,766,164 | Players died: 3 |
deaths
Dead Families:
Deaths per family:
|
|
0
Anonymous (21:06:11 - 04-03)
MrWhite at 20:33:44 on 04/03:
Thats pretty fucking awesome ur doin here mr Anonymous. If you don't like us creating new articles, you might as well not visit the site.
Why offend someone like that while u actually don't have a clue whats up.
Roy is doin a great job and it wasn't his call to make seperate articles it was mine.
Thats pretty fucking awesome ur doin here mr Anonymous. If you don't like us creating new articles, you might as well not visit the site.
Why offend someone like that while u actually don't have a clue whats up.
Roy is doin a great job and it wasn't his call to make seperate articles it was mine.
Let's see by the end of the version, how many wars families participated in, and if you actually got the number right, and not having some war counting double to a certain amount of families.
The IQ some people have... not even accepting criticism... heh.
Just shove your precious little site up yours.
MrWhite at 20:33:44 on 04/03:
Thats pretty fucking awesome ur doin here mr Anonymous. If you don't like us creating new articles, you might as well not visit the site.
Why offend someone like that while u actually don't have a clue whats up.
Roy is doin a great job and it wasn't his call to make seperate articles it was mine.
Thats pretty fucking awesome ur doin here mr Anonymous. If you don't like us creating new articles, you might as well not visit the site.
Why offend someone like that while u actually don't have a clue whats up.
Roy is doin a great job and it wasn't his call to make seperate articles it was mine.
Aart (20:40:48 - 04-03)
MrWhite at 20:33:44 on 04/03:
Thats pretty fucking awesome ur doin here mr Anonymous. If you don't like us creating new articles, you might as well not visit the site.
Why offend someone like that while u actually don't have a clue whats up.
Roy is doin a great job and it wasn't his call to make seperate articles it was mine.
Thats pretty fucking awesome ur doin here mr Anonymous. If you don't like us creating new articles, you might as well not visit the site.
Why offend someone like that while u actually don't have a clue whats up.
Roy is doin a great job and it wasn't his call to make seperate articles it was mine.
always blame deston
Thats pretty fucking awesome ur doin here mr Anonymous. If you don't like us creating new articles, you might as well not visit the site.
Why offend someone like that while u actually don't have a clue whats up.
Roy is doin a great job and it wasn't his call to make seperate articles it was mine.
Why offend someone like that while u actually don't have a clue whats up.
Roy is doin a great job and it wasn't his call to make seperate articles it was mine.
Anonymous (19:58:58 - 04-03)
Deston at 17:29:14 on 04/03:
I'm looking for the part where I say I don't want to hear about other peoples opinions. Looks like you spent 20 minutes writing for something I never said.
I know the new policy is to report every tiny war, so when some random players make the Camorra family and 2 members of the previous Camorra family shoot them down it get's a topic. Fair enough.
Making a new post because Lucchese, Catania and Illusion go down because the same people that were shooting them previously finally finished it after continuous shooting for the last days is stupid. If you look at The revenge you'll notice that their deaths are included in that article where they belong in my opinion. That's how the reporting was handled in all the versions since I've registered my account here, and it feels like it's the right way to me. However I am not here to spoil your party, do as you please. :)
ps. someone tell LL to get his gay ass back here for the reporting >_>
Roy at 17:07:52 on 04/03:
Look at the facts; the only one big war was The Revenge, the rest are all wars that are a result of that one big war.
If you put every "small" war or result from that one war that included at least 28 families into that one topic it wouldn't make sense anymore.
How can you consider it part of that war? It's been at least 5 days now.
This is news, even if it's all headlines from a previous subject.
And yes, I ask opinions or for statements, especially from families that died.
I do this because it'll give them a chance to speak up, and allows people to comment on what they have to say.
If you want to complain or if you find it harder now to find "specific" wars it's not that hard to see that the last 5(4 actually) articles are the smaller results of the one big war named "The Revenge".
It doesn't take a genius to figure out or remember who was in the big war and what happened afterwards.
I personally don't see the point in continueously expanding a war that happened 5 days ago even if it's related, what's wrong with new data?
You say it's losing overview, and you say you don't want to hear about opinions either.
I don't see how anyone could have difficulties finding a specific war at all, the families that are involved are always mentioned in the article and you can find in which articles by checking Scores of War.
Opinions are part of the site, it's part of the game - I will not stop asking for them and adding them to articles because that bores you.
It's been a busy week, so yes these are quite a few articles.
But look at it this way; if there's a lot going on and this is spread over basically 4 articles - and you don't have overview.
How do you expect all 4 articles merged into 1, to tell you what happened when efficiently?
Perhaps we should agree to disagree.
In some way i'm just doing what i'm told anyway :p
Deston at 15:17:44 on 04/03:
The thing is all these topics are making you lose overview. If a few months from now someone wants to find a specific war that happened this version, they have to look through the following list:
04-03 Double Impact!
03-03 Thy name we keep
03-03 Late but lethal
02-03 Serving nobility with blood
02-03 Homeless turning lifeless
01-03 Spring Cleaning!
01-03 Vae victis Capua
27-02 The revenge
27-02 Night war
I highlighted the ones where you might be able to get the name of an involved party from the title. The thing is I can look back at 3.2 and find specific wars with general ease. You're making it so people have to open a ton of pages, and if it's several versions in the future where someone is not even particularly sure he's looking for something from 4.0 then oh dear.
The way reporting is done now makes me feel like when a news site posts 20 articles about the same subject, talking to a cousins brothers neighbour to ask ask how he feels about something and putting his opinion on their website for ads revenues and the very next day they add another 10 articles for good measure. This at least is my opinion of the matter, it doesn't mean everyone has to agree.
Roy at 19:08:50 on 03/03:
Surely, it might all be connected but if you want to merge all the upcoming and past war activities back into 1 news post even when there's several days between them you lose structure and overview.
I don't see why there is complaints about the amount of news posts being made anyway, in reality; all wars are in some way connected to the past. Not ignorant to your point however, just don't see the importance of who is wrong or right in this case, do you?
Deston at 19:06:13 on 03/03:
Is it really? I think it's a fair point made. Even night war & the revenge were pretty much the same thing. I do agree that most of these topics being made are somewhat redundant.
Anonymous at 07:48:11 on 03/03:
bullshit. this is a new war.
Anonymous at 00:09:36 on 03/03:
Redspeert: then it is the question why this got a topic on its own. If they basically killed the entire fam, this isn't a new war, but just part of a previous one and should be part of that war topic as well.
Redspeert: then it is the question why this got a topic on its own. If they basically killed the entire fam, this isn't a new war, but just part of a previous one and should be part of that war topic as well.
Surely, it might all be connected but if you want to merge all the upcoming and past war activities back into 1 news post even when there's several days between them you lose structure and overview.
I don't see why there is complaints about the amount of news posts being made anyway, in reality; all wars are in some way connected to the past. Not ignorant to your point however, just don't see the importance of who is wrong or right in this case, do you?
04-03 Double Impact!
03-03 Thy name we keep
03-03 Late but lethal
02-03 Serving nobility with blood
02-03 Homeless turning lifeless
01-03 Spring Cleaning!
01-03 Vae victis Capua
27-02 The revenge
27-02 Night war
I highlighted the ones where you might be able to get the name of an involved party from the title. The thing is I can look back at 3.2 and find specific wars with general ease. You're making it so people have to open a ton of pages, and if it's several versions in the future where someone is not even particularly sure he's looking for something from 4.0 then oh dear.
The way reporting is done now makes me feel like when a news site posts 20 articles about the same subject, talking to a cousins brothers neighbour to ask ask how he feels about something and putting his opinion on their website for ads revenues and the very next day they add another 10 articles for good measure. This at least is my opinion of the matter, it doesn't mean everyone has to agree.
Look at the facts; the only one big war was The Revenge, the rest are all wars that are a result of that one big war.
If you put every "small" war or result from that one war that included at least 28 families into that one topic it wouldn't make sense anymore.
How can you consider it part of that war? It's been at least 5 days now.
This is news, even if it's all headlines from a previous subject.
And yes, I ask opinions or for statements, especially from families that died.
I do this because it'll give them a chance to speak up, and allows people to comment on what they have to say.
If you want to complain or if you find it harder now to find "specific" wars it's not that hard to see that the last 5(4 actually) articles are the smaller results of the one big war named "The Revenge".
It doesn't take a genius to figure out or remember who was in the big war and what happened afterwards.
I personally don't see the point in continueously expanding a war that happened 5 days ago even if it's related, what's wrong with new data?
You say it's losing overview, and you say you don't want to hear about opinions either.
I don't see how anyone could have difficulties finding a specific war at all, the families that are involved are always mentioned in the article and you can find in which articles by checking Scores of War.
Opinions are part of the site, it's part of the game - I will not stop asking for them and adding them to articles because that bores you.
It's been a busy week, so yes these are quite a few articles.
But look at it this way; if there's a lot going on and this is spread over basically 4 articles - and you don't have overview.
How do you expect all 4 articles merged into 1, to tell you what happened when efficiently?
Perhaps we should agree to disagree.
In some way i'm just doing what i'm told anyway :p
I know the new policy is to report every tiny war, so when some random players make the Camorra family and 2 members of the previous Camorra family shoot them down it get's a topic. Fair enough.
Making a new post because Lucchese, Catania and Illusion go down because the same people that were shooting them previously finally finished it after continuous shooting for the last days is stupid. If you look at The revenge you'll notice that their deaths are included in that article where they belong in my opinion. That's how the reporting was handled in all the versions since I've registered my account here, and it feels like it's the right way to me. However I am not here to spoil your party, do as you please. :)
ps. someone tell LL to get his gay ass back here for the reporting >_>
And I did tell Roy myself in the "Double Impact" article and I quote:
"Roy you can stop creating new articles -.-
It's part of "The Revenge".
Just update that article ffs."
So I totally agree with you.
These fams were all part of "The revenge", and should be updated there, and not create a whole new article for them.
Remember, by the end of the version, Beyond calculates how many wars every fam has been in this version, and now for the likes of Kurosawa, Impact, etc... it will count double.
Then again, you obviously aren't so bright. I pity you. Well, not really, I actually pity the Beyond crew for recruiting you. I did pm sbanks myself, to join, but there was no response.
Roy at 17:07:52 on 04/03:
Look at the facts; the only one big war was The Revenge, the rest are all wars that are a result of that one big war.
If you put every "small" war or result from that one war that included at least 28 families into that one topic it wouldn't make sense anymore.
How can you consider it part of that war? It's been at least 5 days now.
This is news, even if it's all headlines from a previous subject.
And yes, I ask opinions or for statements, especially from families that died.
I do this because it'll give them a chance to speak up, and allows people to comment on what they have to say.
If you want to complain or if you find it harder now to find "specific" wars it's not that hard to see that the last 5(4 actually) articles are the smaller results of the one big war named "The Revenge".
It doesn't take a genius to figure out or remember who was in the big war and what happened afterwards.
I personally don't see the point in continueously expanding a war that happened 5 days ago even if it's related, what's wrong with new data?
You say it's losing overview, and you say you don't want to hear about opinions either.
I don't see how anyone could have difficulties finding a specific war at all, the families that are involved are always mentioned in the article and you can find in which articles by checking Scores of War.
Opinions are part of the site, it's part of the game - I will not stop asking for them and adding them to articles because that bores you.
It's been a busy week, so yes these are quite a few articles.
But look at it this way; if there's a lot going on and this is spread over basically 4 articles - and you don't have overview.
How do you expect all 4 articles merged into 1, to tell you what happened when efficiently?
Perhaps we should agree to disagree.
In some way i'm just doing what i'm told anyway :p
Deston at 15:17:44 on 04/03:
The thing is all these topics are making you lose overview. If a few months from now someone wants to find a specific war that happened this version, they have to look through the following list:
04-03 Double Impact!
03-03 Thy name we keep
03-03 Late but lethal
02-03 Serving nobility with blood
02-03 Homeless turning lifeless
01-03 Spring Cleaning!
01-03 Vae victis Capua
27-02 The revenge
27-02 Night war
I highlighted the ones where you might be able to get the name of an involved party from the title. The thing is I can look back at 3.2 and find specific wars with general ease. You're making it so people have to open a ton of pages, and if it's several versions in the future where someone is not even particularly sure he's looking for something from 4.0 then oh dear.
The way reporting is done now makes me feel like when a news site posts 20 articles about the same subject, talking to a cousins brothers neighbour to ask ask how he feels about something and putting his opinion on their website for ads revenues and the very next day they add another 10 articles for good measure. This at least is my opinion of the matter, it doesn't mean everyone has to agree.
Roy at 19:08:50 on 03/03:
Surely, it might all be connected but if you want to merge all the upcoming and past war activities back into 1 news post even when there's several days between them you lose structure and overview.
I don't see why there is complaints about the amount of news posts being made anyway, in reality; all wars are in some way connected to the past. Not ignorant to your point however, just don't see the importance of who is wrong or right in this case, do you?
Deston at 19:06:13 on 03/03:
Is it really? I think it's a fair point made. Even night war & the revenge were pretty much the same thing. I do agree that most of these topics being made are somewhat redundant.
Anonymous at 07:48:11 on 03/03:
bullshit. this is a new war.
Anonymous at 00:09:36 on 03/03:
Redspeert: then it is the question why this got a topic on its own. If they basically killed the entire fam, this isn't a new war, but just part of a previous one and should be part of that war topic as well.
Redspeert: then it is the question why this got a topic on its own. If they basically killed the entire fam, this isn't a new war, but just part of a previous one and should be part of that war topic as well.
Surely, it might all be connected but if you want to merge all the upcoming and past war activities back into 1 news post even when there's several days between them you lose structure and overview.
I don't see why there is complaints about the amount of news posts being made anyway, in reality; all wars are in some way connected to the past. Not ignorant to your point however, just don't see the importance of who is wrong or right in this case, do you?
04-03 Double Impact!
03-03 Thy name we keep
03-03 Late but lethal
02-03 Serving nobility with blood
02-03 Homeless turning lifeless
01-03 Spring Cleaning!
01-03 Vae victis Capua
27-02 The revenge
27-02 Night war
I highlighted the ones where you might be able to get the name of an involved party from the title. The thing is I can look back at 3.2 and find specific wars with general ease. You're making it so people have to open a ton of pages, and if it's several versions in the future where someone is not even particularly sure he's looking for something from 4.0 then oh dear.
The way reporting is done now makes me feel like when a news site posts 20 articles about the same subject, talking to a cousins brothers neighbour to ask ask how he feels about something and putting his opinion on their website for ads revenues and the very next day they add another 10 articles for good measure. This at least is my opinion of the matter, it doesn't mean everyone has to agree.
Look at the facts; the only one big war was The Revenge, the rest are all wars that are a result of that one big war.
If you put every "small" war or result from that one war that included at least 28 families into that one topic it wouldn't make sense anymore.
How can you consider it part of that war? It's been at least 5 days now.
This is news, even if it's all headlines from a previous subject.
And yes, I ask opinions or for statements, especially from families that died.
I do this because it'll give them a chance to speak up, and allows people to comment on what they have to say.
If you want to complain or if you find it harder now to find "specific" wars it's not that hard to see that the last 5(4 actually) articles are the smaller results of the one big war named "The Revenge".
It doesn't take a genius to figure out or remember who was in the big war and what happened afterwards.
I personally don't see the point in continueously expanding a war that happened 5 days ago even if it's related, what's wrong with new data?
You say it's losing overview, and you say you don't want to hear about opinions either.
I don't see how anyone could have difficulties finding a specific war at all, the families that are involved are always mentioned in the article and you can find in which articles by checking Scores of War.
Opinions are part of the site, it's part of the game - I will not stop asking for them and adding them to articles because that bores you.
It's been a busy week, so yes these are quite a few articles.
But look at it this way; if there's a lot going on and this is spread over basically 4 articles - and you don't have overview.
How do you expect all 4 articles merged into 1, to tell you what happened when efficiently?
Perhaps we should agree to disagree.
In some way i'm just doing what i'm told anyway :p
I know the new policy is to report every tiny war, so when some random players make the Camorra family and 2 members of the previous Camorra family shoot them down it get's a topic. Fair enough.
Making a new post because Lucchese, Catania and Illusion go down because the same people that were shooting them previously finally finished it after continuous shooting for the last days is stupid. If you look at The revenge you'll notice that their deaths are included in that article where they belong in my opinion. That's how the reporting was handled in all the versions since I've registered my account here, and it feels like it's the right way to me. However I am not here to spoil your party, do as you please. :)
ps. someone tell LL to get his gay ass back here for the reporting >_>
Deston at 15:17:44 on 04/03:
The thing is all these topics are making you lose overview. If a few months from now someone wants to find a specific war that happened this version, they have to look through the following list:
04-03 Double Impact!
03-03 Thy name we keep
03-03 Late but lethal
02-03 Serving nobility with blood
02-03 Homeless turning lifeless
01-03 Spring Cleaning!
01-03 Vae victis Capua
27-02 The revenge
27-02 Night war
I highlighted the ones where you might be able to get the name of an involved party from the title. The thing is I can look back at 3.2 and find specific wars with general ease. You're making it so people have to open a ton of pages, and if it's several versions in the future where someone is not even particularly sure he's looking for something from 4.0 then oh dear.
The way reporting is done now makes me feel like when a news site posts 20 articles about the same subject, talking to a cousins brothers neighbour to ask ask how he feels about something and putting his opinion on their website for ads revenues and the very next day they add another 10 articles for good measure. This at least is my opinion of the matter, it doesn't mean everyone has to agree.
Roy at 19:08:50 on 03/03:
Surely, it might all be connected but if you want to merge all the upcoming and past war activities back into 1 news post even when there's several days between them you lose structure and overview.
I don't see why there is complaints about the amount of news posts being made anyway, in reality; all wars are in some way connected to the past. Not ignorant to your point however, just don't see the importance of who is wrong or right in this case, do you?
Deston at 19:06:13 on 03/03:
Is it really? I think it's a fair point made. Even night war & the revenge were pretty much the same thing. I do agree that most of these topics being made are somewhat redundant.
Anonymous at 07:48:11 on 03/03:
bullshit. this is a new war.
Anonymous at 00:09:36 on 03/03:
Redspeert: then it is the question why this got a topic on its own. If they basically killed the entire fam, this isn't a new war, but just part of a previous one and should be part of that war topic as well.
Redspeert: then it is the question why this got a topic on its own. If they basically killed the entire fam, this isn't a new war, but just part of a previous one and should be part of that war topic as well.
Surely, it might all be connected but if you want to merge all the upcoming and past war activities back into 1 news post even when there's several days between them you lose structure and overview.
I don't see why there is complaints about the amount of news posts being made anyway, in reality; all wars are in some way connected to the past. Not ignorant to your point however, just don't see the importance of who is wrong or right in this case, do you?
04-03 Double Impact!
03-03 Thy name we keep
03-03 Late but lethal
02-03 Serving nobility with blood
02-03 Homeless turning lifeless
01-03 Spring Cleaning!
01-03 Vae victis Capua
27-02 The revenge
27-02 Night war
I highlighted the ones where you might be able to get the name of an involved party from the title. The thing is I can look back at 3.2 and find specific wars with general ease. You're making it so people have to open a ton of pages, and if it's several versions in the future where someone is not even particularly sure he's looking for something from 4.0 then oh dear.
The way reporting is done now makes me feel like when a news site posts 20 articles about the same subject, talking to a cousins brothers neighbour to ask ask how he feels about something and putting his opinion on their website for ads revenues and the very next day they add another 10 articles for good measure. This at least is my opinion of the matter, it doesn't mean everyone has to agree.
Look at the facts; the only one big war was The Revenge, the rest are all wars that are a result of that one big war.
If you put every "small" war or result from that one war that included at least 28 families into that one topic it wouldn't make sense anymore.
How can you consider it part of that war? It's been at least 5 days now.
This is news, even if it's all headlines from a previous subject.
And yes, I ask opinions or for statements, especially from families that died.
I do this because it'll give them a chance to speak up, and allows people to comment on what they have to say.
If you want to complain or if you find it harder now to find "specific" wars it's not that hard to see that the last 5(4 actually) articles are the smaller results of the one big war named "The Revenge".
It doesn't take a genius to figure out or remember who was in the big war and what happened afterwards.
I personally don't see the point in continueously expanding a war that happened 5 days ago even if it's related, what's wrong with new data?
You say it's losing overview, and you say you don't want to hear about opinions either.
I don't see how anyone could have difficulties finding a specific war at all, the families that are involved are always mentioned in the article and you can find in which articles by checking Scores of War.
Opinions are part of the site, it's part of the game - I will not stop asking for them and adding them to articles because that bores you.
It's been a busy week, so yes these are quite a few articles.
But look at it this way; if there's a lot going on and this is spread over basically 4 articles - and you don't have overview.
How do you expect all 4 articles merged into 1, to tell you what happened when efficiently?
Perhaps we should agree to disagree.
In some way i'm just doing what i'm told anyway :p
Roy at 19:08:50 on 03/03:
Surely, it might all be connected but if you want to merge all the upcoming and past war activities back into 1 news post even when there's several days between them you lose structure and overview.
I don't see why there is complaints about the amount of news posts being made anyway, in reality; all wars are in some way connected to the past. Not ignorant to your point however, just don't see the importance of who is wrong or right in this case, do you?
Deston at 19:06:13 on 03/03:
Is it really? I think it's a fair point made. Even night war & the revenge were pretty much the same thing. I do agree that most of these topics being made are somewhat redundant.
Anonymous at 07:48:11 on 03/03:
bullshit. this is a new war.
Anonymous at 00:09:36 on 03/03:
Redspeert: then it is the question why this got a topic on its own. If they basically killed the entire fam, this isn't a new war, but just part of a previous one and should be part of that war topic as well.
Redspeert: then it is the question why this got a topic on its own. If they basically killed the entire fam, this isn't a new war, but just part of a previous one and should be part of that war topic as well.
Surely, it might all be connected but if you want to merge all the upcoming and past war activities back into 1 news post even when there's several days between them you lose structure and overview.
I don't see why there is complaints about the amount of news posts being made anyway, in reality; all wars are in some way connected to the past. Not ignorant to your point however, just don't see the importance of who is wrong or right in this case, do you?
04-03 Double Impact!
03-03 Thy name we keep
03-03 Late but lethal
02-03 Serving nobility with blood
02-03 Homeless turning lifeless
01-03 Spring Cleaning!
01-03 Vae victis Capua
27-02 The revenge
27-02 Night war
I highlighted the ones where you might be able to get the name of an involved party from the title. The thing is I can look back at 3.2 and find specific wars with general ease. You're making it so people have to open a ton of pages, and if it's several versions in the future where someone is not even particularly sure he's looking for something from 4.0 then oh dear.
The way reporting is done now makes me feel like when a news site posts 20 articles about the same subject, talking to a cousins brothers neighbour to ask ask how he feels about something and putting his opinion on their website for ads revenues and the very next day they add another 10 articles for good measure. This at least is my opinion of the matter, it doesn't mean everyone has to agree.
Empaler (12:11:24 - 04-03)
Redspeert at 19:20:43 on 02/03:
Illusion was up in 2008 (2.8a). 7 years is false.
Illusion was up in 2008 (2.8a). 7 years is false.
We started in 2.5
Cappittoo (23:02:24 - 03-03)
BoHeM at 12:15:04 on 03/03:
nice job Kuro.useless illusion go away
nice job Kuro.useless illusion go away
Where is you usefull family? If you gonna embarrass yourself at least write anonymous ;)
Deston at 19:06:13 on 03/03:
Is it really? I think it's a fair point made. Even night war & the revenge were pretty much the same thing. I do agree that most of these topics being made are somewhat redundant.
Anonymous at 07:48:11 on 03/03:
bullshit. this is a new war.
Anonymous at 00:09:36 on 03/03:
Redspeert: then it is the question why this got a topic on its own. If they basically killed the entire fam, this isn't a new war, but just part of a previous one and should be part of that war topic as well.
Redspeert: then it is the question why this got a topic on its own. If they basically killed the entire fam, this isn't a new war, but just part of a previous one and should be part of that war topic as well.
Surely, it might all be connected but if you want to merge all the upcoming and past war activities back into 1 news post even when there's several days between them you lose structure and overview.
I don't see why there is complaints about the amount of news posts being made anyway, in reality; all wars are in some way connected to the past. Not ignorant to your point however, just don't see the importance of who is wrong or right in this case, do you?
Anonymous at 07:48:11 on 03/03:
bullshit. this is a new war.
Anonymous at 00:09:36 on 03/03:
Redspeert: then it is the question why this got a topic on its own. If they basically killed the entire fam, this isn't a new war, but just part of a previous one and should be part of that war topic as well.
Redspeert: then it is the question why this got a topic on its own. If they basically killed the entire fam, this isn't a new war, but just part of a previous one and should be part of that war topic as well.
Seeing (14:07:18 - 03-03)
I wonder how that Kurosawa has top and who is now General | Yamamoto - Kurosawa top:
? LOL
? LOL
BoHeM (12:15:04 - 03-03)
nice job Kuro.useless illusion go away
Anonymous at 01:29:46 on 03/03:
Funny...Albanians support Serbs :)
Grannqe at 23:08:20 on 02/03:
why so much hate towards them? LOL
Illusion had 7brugs and 22 chiefs before the war, but all got shot down by the samurai alliance, now they just finished the leftovers!
samurai-o_
why so much hate towards them? LOL
Illusion had 7brugs and 22 chiefs before the war, but all got shot down by the samurai alliance, now they just finished the leftovers!
samurai-o_
Funny...Albanians support Serbs :)
Game is on the right, and Policitics on the left:)
Anonymous (07:48:11 - 03-03)
Anonymous at 00:09:36 on 03/03:
Redspeert: then it is the question why this got a topic on its own. If they basically killed the entire fam, this isn't a new war, but just part of a previous one and should be part of that war topic as well.
Redspeert: then it is the question why this got a topic on its own. If they basically killed the entire fam, this isn't a new war, but just part of a previous one and should be part of that war topic as well.
Anonymous (02:29:46 - 03-03)
Redspeert at 00:20:13 on 03/03:
I did not make this topic, so I do not know.
Anonymous at 00:09:36 on 03/03:
Redspeert: then it is the question why this got a topic on its own. If they basically killed the entire fam, this isn't a new war, but just part of a previous one and should be part of that war topic as well.
Redspeert: then it is the question why this got a topic on its own. If they basically killed the entire fam, this isn't a new war, but just part of a previous one and should be part of that war topic as well.
I did not make this topic, so I do not know.
what are you defencing ? ppl are saying that shooting belongs to big war, and its not a noble act by it self, those samurai wannabies didnt do any special. They did what every blood did, like illusion who they shot.
Anonymous (01:29:46 - 03-03)
Grannqe at 23:08:20 on 02/03:
why so much hate towards them? LOL
Illusion had 7brugs and 22 chiefs before the war, but all got shot down by the samurai alliance, now they just finished the leftovers!
samurai-o_
why so much hate towards them? LOL
Illusion had 7brugs and 22 chiefs before the war, but all got shot down by the samurai alliance, now they just finished the leftovers!
samurai-o_
Funny...Albanians support Serbs :)
Thats pretty fucking awesome ur doin here mr Anonymous. If you don't like us creating new articles, you might as well not visit the site.
Why offend someone like that while u actually don't have a clue whats up.
Roy is doin a great job and it wasn't his call to make seperate articles it was mine.
If u need to blame one, blame me
And criticism is great, keeps people sharp. But not like this.
We make the different articles for a reason and doin this as volunteers.
Even saw in a comment something about ad revenues, if we even had enough to keep some ourselves it would surely not pay for the time spend by coding and maintaining the site.
Thats pretty fucking awesome ur doin here mr Anonymous. If you don't like us creating new articles, you might as well not visit the site.
Why offend someone like that while u actually don't have a clue whats up.
Roy is doin a great job and it wasn't his call to make seperate articles it was mine.
Let's see by the end of the version, how many wars families participated in, and if you actually got the number right, and not having some war counting double to a certain amount of families.
The IQ some people have... not even accepting criticism... heh.
Just shove your precious little site up yours.