» Menu
» OB/Site News
» Articles
» Barafranca News
 |
|
article
Provenzano and Leviticus are getting hit by a group of families, containing Tempestuoso, Gravano, Messina, Vertigo+, Monte Carlo & Liberta/Ocean.
Destination attempts to launch a surprise counteroffensive against Liberta/Ocean, but only minutes after opening fire they are also taking heavy damage.
Then, in turn, Cristeria joins in on the fighting and starts shooting at Destination.
/q LL for top statements/info
Destination attempts to launch a surprise counteroffensive against Liberta/Ocean, but only minutes after opening fire they are also taking heavy damage.
Then, in turn, Cristeria joins in on the fighting and starts shooting at Destination.
/q LL for top statements/info
statements
Zevs (Provenzano); This war was inevitable since there are only 2 sides in this version.
statistics
| War started on: 17:56:00 19-10-2012 | War ended on: 02:44:01 20-10-2012 |
| Bullet difference: -13,475,692 | War duration: 8h 48m |
| Money difference: -$977,070,663 | Players died: 115 |
deaths
Dead Families:
Deaths per family:
|
|
0
Anonymous (02:56:19 - 21-10)
Anonymous (00:13:51 - 21-10)
Anonymous at 09:31:17 on 20/10:
Who are this so called pact? Seems to be the devil who shapes shift each time someone is dieing :P
But for real, who is so called pact? Cause Lucchese ain't up, Conflict ain't up, Righ ain't up, Brui ain't up.
I could not get the old naming of the pact, since it was just a name out of jealously and fear and anger
But now still calling the current fam the so called pact? Common, some people really make a joke of themselves.
Learn to die or stop playing will ya! Else omerta will die because of all the whining....
Who are this so called pact? Seems to be the devil who shapes shift each time someone is dieing :P
But for real, who is so called pact? Cause Lucchese ain't up, Conflict ain't up, Righ ain't up, Brui ain't up.
I could not get the old naming of the pact, since it was just a name out of jealously and fear and anger
But now still calling the current fam the so called pact? Common, some people really make a joke of themselves.
Learn to die or stop playing will ya! Else omerta will die because of all the whining....
Ironically, I bet it's the same dude, that cried last version, that there's no point ranking up against the odds.
Redspeert at 12:46:10 on 20/10:
Amnesia, Leviticus, Manicomio, Nazdrovia, Organizatsya, Provenzano, Ramcares, Tempestuoso vs Austerity, Regedited
Ottomans vs Anadolu, Clockwork, Destination, Krays, Leviticus, Manicomio, Provenzano, Ramcares
Amnesia, Anonymous, Purgatory, Stigmata, Turkuz, Vertigo vs Anadolu, Ataraxia, Barzini, Carpedium, Destination, Guccione, Krays, Leviticus, Manicomio, Marazzino, Provenzano, Ramcares, Tempestuoso
Chivas, Destination, Krays, Leviticus, Marazzino, Provenzano vs Presidents, Redvendetta
In some of these wars the ranks to shot together with provenzano was 5/6 vs 1 in terms of chief+. I don't get why some prov/levi tops are whining about gangbangs when they just got served the same style they played 100% of last version. Cant handle the same treatment as you give out?
Anonymous at 12:28:23 on 20/10:
As for the prov whiners about difference in attack vs def
http://news.omertabeyond.com/famhistory/Provenzano
See for yourself how brave prov was in 3.5 wars :P
As for the prov whiners about difference in attack vs def
http://news.omertabeyond.com/famhistory/Provenzano
See for yourself how brave prov was in 3.5 wars :P
Amnesia, Leviticus, Manicomio, Nazdrovia, Organizatsya, Provenzano, Ramcares, Tempestuoso vs Austerity, Regedited
Ottomans vs Anadolu, Clockwork, Destination, Krays, Leviticus, Manicomio, Provenzano, Ramcares
Amnesia, Anonymous, Purgatory, Stigmata, Turkuz, Vertigo vs Anadolu, Ataraxia, Barzini, Carpedium, Destination, Guccione, Krays, Leviticus, Manicomio, Marazzino, Provenzano, Ramcares, Tempestuoso
Chivas, Destination, Krays, Leviticus, Marazzino, Provenzano vs Presidents, Redvendetta
In some of these wars the ranks to shot together with provenzano was 5/6 vs 1 in terms of chief+. I don't get why some prov/levi tops are whining about gangbangs when they just got served the same style they played 100% of last version. Cant handle the same treatment as you give out?
We can handle it fine Redspeert and no one is whining about gangbangs - Attacking fams did their job fine....The rest? Thats another story.
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke
Im not saying anyone is good or evil here :p but you get my point ^^
Boleone at 14:42:49 on 20/10:
You can consider w/e you like. As I said, if you were a serious debater, since you're replying to a serious topic(s) about 3:1 ratio, Destination and bloods, you wouldn't run away to sarcasm. 1. Logical move 2. Logical move 3. Logical move. I didn't see anyone enter a war for a long time with the casualties 20:1 in first 30 minutes. So, you can't blame bloods for not entering.
Last version was pretty interesting because there wasn't a first war with this kind of outcome. 1.85 in Total Point losses Def:Att, and in this war it is 4.42. And it wasn't 11 v 2, 5 different families were targeted I believe. Also, there was an organised counter because there was a lot of backfire kills comparing to last night. Lucchese, an attacking family which wasn't countered lost 10 brugliones. 4 defending/1 attacking families were down. Completely different story... And that war "opened" the version, to make it more interesting than 3.3. and 3.4 were... Families changed on the top, a lot of ugly wars happened, and that was the beauty of it. I'm not whining, every attacker gets shot in the near future, when you get it, game becomes more relaxing to play and you enjoy it more.
LL at 13:23:18 on 20/10:
Hm? It was about the banning, and you taking a serious response to that.
Although I am considering banning you for calling me out like that.
Boleone at 12:56:47 on 20/10:
Nice try ^^ too bad you're backing out so fast... I thought you were a serious debater.
LL at 12:45:50 on 20/10:
Troll. Fish. Bait.
Caught.
Troll. Fish. Bait.
Caught.
Nice try ^^ too bad you're backing out so fast... I thought you were a serious debater.
Hm? It was about the banning, and you taking a serious response to that.
Although I am considering banning you for calling me out like that.
You can consider w/e you like. As I said, if you were a serious debater, since you're replying to a serious topic(s) about 3:1 ratio, Destination and bloods, you wouldn't run away to sarcasm. 1. Logical move 2. Logical move 3. Logical move. I didn't see anyone enter a war for a long time with the casualties 20:1 in first 30 minutes. So, you can't blame bloods for not entering.
Last version was pretty interesting because there wasn't a first war with this kind of outcome. 1.85 in Total Point losses Def:Att, and in this war it is 4.42. And it wasn't 11 v 2, 5 different families were targeted I believe. Also, there was an organised counter because there was a lot of backfire kills comparing to last night. Lucchese, an attacking family which wasn't countered lost 10 brugliones. 4 defending/1 attacking families were down. Completely different story... And that war "opened" the version, to make it more interesting than 3.3. and 3.4 were... Families changed on the top, a lot of ugly wars happened, and that was the beauty of it. I'm not whining, every attacker gets shot in the near future, when you get it, game becomes more relaxing to play and you enjoy it more.
LL at 13:23:18 on 20/10:
Hm? It was about the banning, and you taking a serious response to that.
Although I am considering banning you for calling me out like that.
Boleone at 12:56:47 on 20/10:
Nice try ^^ too bad you're backing out so fast... I thought you were a serious debater.
LL at 12:45:50 on 20/10:
Troll. Fish. Bait.
Caught.
Troll. Fish. Bait.
Caught.
Nice try ^^ too bad you're backing out so fast... I thought you were a serious debater.
Hm? It was about the banning, and you taking a serious response to that.
Although I am considering banning you for calling me out like that.
You can consider w/e you like. As I said, if you were a serious debater, since you're replying to a serious topic(s) about 3:1 ratio, Destination and bloods, you wouldn't run away to sarcasm. 1. Logical move 2. Logical move 3. Logical move. I didn't see anyone enter a war for a long time with the casualties 20:1 in first 30 minutes. So, you can't blame bloods for not entering.
Last version was pretty interesting because there wasn't a first war with this kind of outcome. 1.85 in Total Point losses Def:Att, and in this war it is 4.42. And it wasn't 11 v 2, 5 different families were targeted I believe. Also, there was an organised counter because there was a lot of backfire kills comparing to last night. Lucchese, an attacking family which wasn't countered lost 10 brugliones. 4 defending/1 attacking families were down. Completely different story... And that war "opened" the version, to make it more interesting than 3.3. and 3.4 were... Families changed on the top, a lot of ugly wars happened, and that was the beauty of it. I'm not whining, every attacker gets shot in the near future, when you get it, game becomes more relaxing to play and you enjoy it more.
Anonymous (14:17:02 - 20-10)
LL at 13:40:59 on 20/10:
What argument? That I ban people because I disagree with them was a mere pun.
There was no argument, save for Boleone commenting on it. Well he did not notice the sarcasm in it, so be it. There was no argument.
There was however an argument on whether the attackers did a fair thing or not by outnumbering their opponents 3 to 1. There was an argument about Destination just doing their job. There was an argument about Levi's other bloods not entering the war, thus making it easier for the attackers.
And there should be a discussion about the Anonymous logins. This place is starting to look like 4chan.
What argument? That I ban people because I disagree with them was a mere pun.
There was no argument, save for Boleone commenting on it. Well he did not notice the sarcasm in it, so be it. There was no argument.
There was however an argument on whether the attackers did a fair thing or not by outnumbering their opponents 3 to 1. There was an argument about Destination just doing their job. There was an argument about Levi's other bloods not entering the war, thus making it easier for the attackers.
And there should be a discussion about the Anonymous logins. This place is starting to look like 4chan.
maybe you should start writing anonymous, so people dont know who is making himself look like an idiot. And yes you are looking like a idiot
What argument? That I ban people because I disagree with them was a mere pun.
There was no argument, save for Boleone commenting on it. Well he did not notice the sarcasm in it, so be it. There was no argument.
There was however an argument on whether the attackers did a fair thing or not by outnumbering their opponents 3 to 1. There was an argument about Destination just doing their job. There was an argument about Levi's other bloods not entering the war, thus making it easier for the attackers.
And there should be a discussion about the Anonymous logins. This place is starting to look like 4chan.
There was no argument, save for Boleone commenting on it. Well he did not notice the sarcasm in it, so be it. There was no argument.
There was however an argument on whether the attackers did a fair thing or not by outnumbering their opponents 3 to 1. There was an argument about Destination just doing their job. There was an argument about Levi's other bloods not entering the war, thus making it easier for the attackers.
And there should be a discussion about the Anonymous logins. This place is starting to look like 4chan.
Anonymous (13:30:03 - 20-10)
LL at 13:23:18 on 20/10:
Hm? It was about the banning, and you taking a serious response to that.
Although I am considering banning you for calling me out like that.
Boleone at 12:56:47 on 20/10:
Nice try ^^ too bad you're backing out so fast... I thought you were a serious debater.
LL at 12:45:50 on 20/10:
Troll. Fish. Bait.
Caught.
Troll. Fish. Bait.
Caught.
Nice try ^^ too bad you're backing out so fast... I thought you were a serious debater.
Hm? It was about the banning, and you taking a serious response to that.
Although I am considering banning you for calling me out like that.
lol LLoser, if you cant handle a argument, dont start one. Troll. Fish. Bait. haha sure, as long as you believe it yourself
Boleone at 12:56:47 on 20/10:
Nice try ^^ too bad you're backing out so fast... I thought you were a serious debater.
LL at 12:45:50 on 20/10:
Troll. Fish. Bait.
Caught.
Troll. Fish. Bait.
Caught.
Nice try ^^ too bad you're backing out so fast... I thought you were a serious debater.
Hm? It was about the banning, and you taking a serious response to that.
Although I am considering banning you for calling me out like that.
LL at 12:45:50 on 20/10:
Troll. Fish. Bait.
Caught.
Troll. Fish. Bait.
Caught.
Nice try ^^ too bad you're backing out so fast... I thought you were a serious debater.
zevs at 12:28:39 on 20/10:
w/e LL , that top statement is a fake one. remove it.
w/e LL , that top statement is a fake one. remove it.
Well, its not fake. Its your own words, he just left out the "Can we reset now since its over ? :')" as it qualified to proper whining. A version is over over just because you died. Did you see tops last version cry for reset after the first war, when you guys killed them?
zevs at 12:28:39 on 20/10:
w/e LL , that top statement is a fake one. remove it.
w/e LL , that top statement is a fake one. remove it.
Done. I apologize, I had no right to insert that comma into your text as I did.
Anonymous at 12:28:23 on 20/10:
As for the prov whiners about difference in attack vs def
http://news.omertabeyond.com/famhistory/Provenzano
See for yourself how brave prov was in 3.5 wars :P
As for the prov whiners about difference in attack vs def
http://news.omertabeyond.com/famhistory/Provenzano
See for yourself how brave prov was in 3.5 wars :P
Amnesia, Leviticus, Manicomio, Nazdrovia, Organizatsya, Provenzano, Ramcares, Tempestuoso vs Austerity, Regedited
Ottomans vs Anadolu, Clockwork, Destination, Krays, Leviticus, Manicomio, Provenzano, Ramcares
Amnesia, Anonymous, Purgatory, Stigmata, Turkuz, Vertigo vs Anadolu, Ataraxia, Barzini, Carpedium, Destination, Guccione, Krays, Leviticus, Manicomio, Marazzino, Provenzano, Ramcares, Tempestuoso
Chivas, Destination, Krays, Leviticus, Marazzino, Provenzano vs Presidents, Redvendetta
In some of these wars the ranks to shot together with provenzano was 5/6 vs 1 in terms of chief+. I don't get why some prov/levi tops are whining about gangbangs when they just got served the same style they played 100% of last version. Cant handle the same treatment as you give out?
Versions change, families change, whining about gangbangs and pacts and how fams are bitches and pussys and others are backstabbers continue, the cries for reset after 1 single war start ahhhh the good old omerta xD
LL at 12:07:50 on 20/10:
Feel free to refresh my memory on that.
If someone claims something, and I think that is not true, then I think it's appropriate to respond to said claim with a proper explanation. Or I delete the post and ban the motherfucker.
But with 16 year olds running around, I suppose a simple reply is enough.
Boleone at 11:56:59 on 20/10:
LL, who are you?
Ahhhh the guy who emoquited the fam in 3.2 in the middle of a war while holding a roullie? :)
LL, who are you?
Ahhhh the guy who emoquited the fam in 3.2 in the middle of a war while holding a roullie? :)
Feel free to refresh my memory on that.
Why are you trying to defend the attackers?
If someone claims something, and I think that is not true, then I think it's appropriate to respond to said claim with a proper explanation. Or I delete the post and ban the motherfucker.
But with 16 year olds running around, I suppose a simple reply is enough.
Who gives you the right to delete someone's post and ban the motherfucker if you're not feeling the same as him? :) I don't see a lot of 16 year olds? Are you a teenager?
annienomous (12:34:41 - 20-10)
Also ll, u are not objective at all..
annienomous (12:33:35 - 20-10)
But if fams would counter than the pussy attackers would probably still have a shitload of fams waiting to counter on the countering fams which would still make it a 3/4 v 1 ratio :x
Troll. Fish. Bait.
Caught.
Nice try ^^ too bad you're backing out so fast... I thought you were a serious debater.
Hm? It was about the banning, and you taking a serious response to that.
Although I am considering banning you for calling me out like that.
You can consider w/e you like. As I said, if you were a serious debater, since you're replying to a serious topic(s) about 3:1 ratio, Destination and bloods, you wouldn't run away to sarcasm. 1. Logical move 2. Logical move 3. Logical move. I didn't see anyone enter a war for a long time with the casualties 20:1 in first 30 minutes. So, you can't blame bloods for not entering.
Last version was pretty interesting because there wasn't a first war with this kind of outcome. 1.85 in Total Point losses Def:Att, and in this war it is 4.42. And it wasn't 11 v 2, 5 different families were targeted I believe. Also, there was an organised counter because there was a lot of backfire kills comparing to last night. Lucchese, an attacking family which wasn't countered lost 10 brugliones. 4 defending/1 attacking families were down. Completely different story... And that war "opened" the version, to make it more interesting than 3.3. and 3.4 were... Families changed on the top, a lot of ugly wars happened, and that was the beauty of it. I'm not whining, every attacker gets shot in the near future, when you get it, game becomes more relaxing to play and you enjoy it more.
lol. IS THAT THE BEST YOU CAN DO LUNATIKO :>