» Menu
» OB/Site News
» Articles
» Barafranca News
 |
|
article
There has been some debate already on the OmertaBeyond News site whether or not the HoF awards are given towards the correct players and family.
In this version the following players and family have won themselves a place into the eternal omerta history:
Hall of Fame - Top Family
3.5 Leviticus - Trystan
Hall of Fame - Top Ranker
3.5 Alemci
Hall of Fame - Top Killer
3.5 Morgash
Hall of Fame - Top Buster
3.5 Assassin
For all winners you could have a debate.
Is the Family with the highest famworth in the game at the time of the reset, really the winner of the version?
Is the ranker with the most RP actually the best ranker in the game? People who have died multiple times could have gained more Rank Points than the guy that lived through out the entire version.
For the topkiller, only your Chief+ kills count, but why do famless Chief+ kills count? And why is there not formula that makes a GF kill more important than a famless Chief kill?
With the Top buster there of course is the same reasoning as with the top ranker, busters that got killed during the version can have, cumulative, busted out more people than the one that lived the entire version (buster x dies 2 times but has 10000 12000 and 15000 busts on his account, getting him a grand total of 37000 busts, yet the #1, that gets the voucher only has 1 account but manages to bust 25000 people on that account).
So the question we ask you is:
Do you believe the HoF Vouchers are handed out to the correct people?
In this version the following players and family have won themselves a place into the eternal omerta history:
Hall of Fame - Top Family
3.5 Leviticus - Trystan
Hall of Fame - Top Ranker
3.5 Alemci
Hall of Fame - Top Killer
3.5 Morgash
Hall of Fame - Top Buster
3.5 Assassin
For all winners you could have a debate.
Is the Family with the highest famworth in the game at the time of the reset, really the winner of the version?
Is the ranker with the most RP actually the best ranker in the game? People who have died multiple times could have gained more Rank Points than the guy that lived through out the entire version.
For the topkiller, only your Chief+ kills count, but why do famless Chief+ kills count? And why is there not formula that makes a GF kill more important than a famless Chief kill?
With the Top buster there of course is the same reasoning as with the top ranker, busters that got killed during the version can have, cumulative, busted out more people than the one that lived the entire version (buster x dies 2 times but has 10000 12000 and 15000 busts on his account, getting him a grand total of 37000 busts, yet the #1, that gets the voucher only has 1 account but manages to bust 25000 people on that account).
So the question we ask you is:
Do you believe the HoF Vouchers are handed out to the correct people?
poll
TheProwling (20:50:29 - 16-09)
Anonymous (08:06:56 - 15-09)
Redspeert at 17:59:46 on 14/09:
Marazzino are big, but levi and desti aren't the biggest fams around.
MrWhite at 15:57:18 on 14/09:
Levi Desti and Mara are small ?
TheProwling at 15:50:26 on 14/09:BUT, I think that would be better if the end of the round would be a set date/time, so all the families know what they will need to focus on to win, and who to take down. Now, when the round ends at just the time the big fams have been killed, it is always one of the smaller ones at the top...
Levi Desti and Mara are small ?
Marazzino are big, but levi and desti aren't the biggest fams around.
Maraz is like levi+desti combined
MrWhite at 15:57:18 on 14/09:
Levi Desti and Mara are small ?
TheProwling at 15:50:26 on 14/09:BUT, I think that would be better if the end of the round would be a set date/time, so all the families know what they will need to focus on to win, and who to take down. Now, when the round ends at just the time the big fams have been killed, it is always one of the smaller ones at the top...
Levi Desti and Mara are small ?
Marazzino are big, but levi and desti aren't the biggest fams around.
TheProwling at 15:50:26 on 14/09:
The top ranker/buster is right imo, when a character dies, someone can create a new character, but it must be seen as a new character, so I dont think you should add it up.
The top ranker/buster is right imo, when a character dies, someone can create a new character, but it must be seen as a new character, so I dont think you should add it up.
i totaly agree,
for top killer, i dunno exactly how they do it at the moment, but it would be nice to give more points for a bruglione who is in a family then for a bruglione who isn't in a family.
and some formula like: 1 point for LC, 3 for Chief, 5 for brug etc. etc.
TheProwling at 15:50:26 on 14/09:BUT, I think that would be better if the end of the round would be a set date/time, so all the families know what they will need to focus on to win, and who to take down. Now, when the round ends at just the time the big fams have been killed, it is always one of the smaller ones at the top...
Levi Desti and Mara are small ?
TheProwling (15:50:26 - 14-09)
The top ranker/buster is right imo, when a character dies, someone can create a new character, but it must be seen as a new character, so I dont think you should add it up.
I like the top killer to be the number top killed, and I agree on the current system used (and I like Morgash, and I think he was the best killer)
Top family is debatable, but still, you need to be alive (no matter how you play, how fair or unfair, honourable or unhonourable) to be able to be a winner. BUT, I think that would be better if the end of the round would be a set date/time, so all the families know what they will need to focus on to win, and who to take down. Now, when the round ends at just the time the big fams have been killed, it is always one of the smaller ones at the top...
I dont think you should say a family is the best, based on how many wars they were in. Because some fams 'are in a war' but dont take any shots, etc etc. Maybe, the biggest worth in the round (before they were killed) would be a good one?
I like the top killer to be the number top killed, and I agree on the current system used (and I like Morgash, and I think he was the best killer)
Top family is debatable, but still, you need to be alive (no matter how you play, how fair or unfair, honourable or unhonourable) to be able to be a winner. BUT, I think that would be better if the end of the round would be a set date/time, so all the families know what they will need to focus on to win, and who to take down. Now, when the round ends at just the time the big fams have been killed, it is always one of the smaller ones at the top...
I dont think you should say a family is the best, based on how many wars they were in. Because some fams 'are in a war' but dont take any shots, etc etc. Maybe, the biggest worth in the round (before they were killed) would be a good one?
Top Family : Nope, last family standing with ONLY their bloods should be the winner.
Top Ranker : I think that #1 should be. Gratz Alemci
Top Killer : The game gives you options to be a member of a family, or not to be. Why is a famless chief less important? He/she has chosen maybe to play that way. At last, we had 4 or 5 top20 accounts being famless for weeks... Turco, Hitman, Nick... Vetto was a one-guy family...
Morgash is the 1st on bullets shot. But if we want to make difference for Chief-Bruglione-CD-GF, they should use KS as only the parameter in the equation. And make it unlimited. Meaning you can have 224.5% KS. So at the end of the version, you'll know which account is the best killer. Several adjustments have to be done for this to work.
Top Buster : Staying alive and killing is the main goal in this game. If someone died with 10.000 bustouts, and made another 10.000, guy standing the whole version with 11.000 is better imo. It is a secondary thing to do in a shooting game.
Top Ranker : I think that #1 should be. Gratz Alemci
Top Killer : The game gives you options to be a member of a family, or not to be. Why is a famless chief less important? He/she has chosen maybe to play that way. At last, we had 4 or 5 top20 accounts being famless for weeks... Turco, Hitman, Nick... Vetto was a one-guy family...
Morgash is the 1st on bullets shot. But if we want to make difference for Chief-Bruglione-CD-GF, they should use KS as only the parameter in the equation. And make it unlimited. Meaning you can have 224.5% KS. So at the end of the version, you'll know which account is the best killer. Several adjustments have to be done for this to work.
Top Buster : Staying alive and killing is the main goal in this game. If someone died with 10.000 bustouts, and made another 10.000, guy standing the whole version with 11.000 is better imo. It is a secondary thing to do in a shooting game.
Bossy (14:20:39 - 14-09)
HoF should be different. First of all, there should be counter for bullets shot per family or something to give the realistic picture of how much some family shot in war. Family work should be counted on real gangster activity as bullets shoot, wars organized bla bla bla and not how much bullets you managed to save. All this winning family with the most fam worth is stupid. Gain bullets, hug, save accounts - that is what you need to do to win :') Nice omerta :P
Anyways, Levi did good job this version, they shoot a lot, stand by their bloods. But I dont think they were the best. Krays and Desti did much better. More wars, more shooting. Krays even went down and they get up again strong. Desti got shot 2 times and survived (thanks to their bloods ofc, including Levi). So, for winning fam:
1.Desti - 14 wars (2 times they were shoot and didnt went down)
2. Krays - 9 wars but i think that they shoot more than marazz which was involved in 12 wars for example. big respect for coming back after they went down
3.Levi - 12 wars (they always helped bloods, good shooters and they remained fam with the most fam worth at the end)
Well all together, they did really good job.
Top buster - ok. Whoever has the most busts deserve it. Same goes for highest RP or Kills, eventho i think that some other factors should be included. I think the best player of omerta should be more than just RP or whatever.
Anyways, Levi did good job this version, they shoot a lot, stand by their bloods. But I dont think they were the best. Krays and Desti did much better. More wars, more shooting. Krays even went down and they get up again strong. Desti got shot 2 times and survived (thanks to their bloods ofc, including Levi). So, for winning fam:
1.Desti - 14 wars (2 times they were shoot and didnt went down)
2. Krays - 9 wars but i think that they shoot more than marazz which was involved in 12 wars for example. big respect for coming back after they went down
3.Levi - 12 wars (they always helped bloods, good shooters and they remained fam with the most fam worth at the end)
Well all together, they did really good job.
Top buster - ok. Whoever has the most busts deserve it. Same goes for highest RP or Kills, eventho i think that some other factors should be included. I think the best player of omerta should be more than just RP or whatever.
Anonymous (13:51:15 - 14-09)
Well, if I had to pick one fam, I would rather give that award to Desti, not Levi.
No, I did not get shot by Levi, my fam is still up, too.
No, I am not in Desti.
No, I did not get shot by Levi, my fam is still up, too.
No, I am not in Desti.
Levi Desti and Mara are small ?
Sorry for touching your (small) sensitive spot there mate..