» Menu
» OB/Site News
» Articles
 |
» Barafranca News
 |
|
article
Pi Day is a holiday commemorating the mathematical constant π (pi). Pi Day is celebrated on March 14.
There are many ways of celebrating Pi Day. Some of them include eating pie and discussing the relevance of π.
Today the mafia world decided to celeberate this day with a war!
So far S.w.a.t & Turania is being targeted by several families from "The Pact"
more to come!
There are many ways of celebrating Pi Day. Some of them include eating pie and discussing the relevance of π.
Today the mafia world decided to celeberate this day with a war!
So far S.w.a.t & Turania is being targeted by several families from "The Pact"
more to come!
statements
/q sbanks | #beyond.info
statistics
| War started on: 22:12:03 14-03-2012 | War ended on: 12:33:02 15-03-2012 |
| Bullet difference: -15,834,623 | War duration: 14h 20m |
| Money difference: -$368,229,193 | Players died: 106 |
deaths
Dead Families:
Deaths per family:
|
|
1
Anonymous (19:43:01 - 15-03)
ROFL @ Bramblerose , being #1 doesnt matter for account strenght , that brug killed the GF in backfire cause he was stronger then him :D stronger in what ? xD maybe he had more races won ahaa or more raid's made , omg how can she be a version manager.
Arcanine at 19:21:44 on 15/03:
I mailed Brando about the deaths of Elmatador and Madness..Bramblerose replyed this morning..surprisingly quick for once :
**
The crew is correct in these, both the dev and myself have checked the kills and couldn’t find anything wrong. There is no random factor in the KA and the kills were made cause the other party was simply stronger than the attacker.
Having #1 rank doesn’t mean you’re the strongest player around, it doesn’t say anything about how strong one is. It’s a combination of a lot of things that gives one the #1 rank.
I also want to say that you’re misinformed, the player that killed Elmatador in backfire didn’t had 23% health left. I know this cause I checked all files myself yesterday on Elmatadors request.
Everyone is killable, these akills lately simply proofs it. (and yes, it is a matter of your account settings and I’m afraid we can’t tell how that works)
**
So they are still claiming that Elmatador AND Madness simply had weaker accounts even though everything points to the opposite.
I mailed Brando about the deaths of Elmatador and Madness..Bramblerose replyed this morning..surprisingly quick for once :
**
The crew is correct in these, both the dev and myself have checked the kills and couldn’t find anything wrong. There is no random factor in the KA and the kills were made cause the other party was simply stronger than the attacker.
Having #1 rank doesn’t mean you’re the strongest player around, it doesn’t say anything about how strong one is. It’s a combination of a lot of things that gives one the #1 rank.
I also want to say that you’re misinformed, the player that killed Elmatador in backfire didn’t had 23% health left. I know this cause I checked all files myself yesterday on Elmatadors request.
Everyone is killable, these akills lately simply proofs it. (and yes, it is a matter of your account settings and I’m afraid we can’t tell how that works)
**
So they are still claiming that Elmatador AND Madness simply had weaker accounts even though everything points to the opposite.
How exactly can someone be stronger than #1 player in the game?
I'd like to have an answer to that from the admins.
"Everyone is killable, these akills lately simply proofs it."
AHAHAHAHAAH, wow... just WOW x'D
Women logics :')
AHAHAHAHAAH, wow... just WOW x'D
Women logics :')
I mailed Brando about the deaths of Elmatador and Madness..Bramblerose replyed this morning..surprisingly quick for once :
**
The crew is correct in these, both the dev and myself have checked the kills and couldn’t find anything wrong. There is no random factor in the KA and the kills were made cause the other party was simply stronger than the attacker.
Having #1 rank doesn’t mean you’re the strongest player around, it doesn’t say anything about how strong one is. It’s a combination of a lot of things that gives one the #1 rank.
I also want to say that you’re misinformed, the player that killed Elmatador in backfire didn’t had 23% health left. I know this cause I checked all files myself yesterday on Elmatadors request.
Everyone is killable, these akills lately simply proofs it. (and yes, it is a matter of your account settings and I’m afraid we can’t tell how that works)
**
So they are still claiming that Elmatador AND Madness simply had weaker accounts even though everything points to the opposite.
**
The crew is correct in these, both the dev and myself have checked the kills and couldn’t find anything wrong. There is no random factor in the KA and the kills were made cause the other party was simply stronger than the attacker.
Having #1 rank doesn’t mean you’re the strongest player around, it doesn’t say anything about how strong one is. It’s a combination of a lot of things that gives one the #1 rank.
I also want to say that you’re misinformed, the player that killed Elmatador in backfire didn’t had 23% health left. I know this cause I checked all files myself yesterday on Elmatadors request.
Everyone is killable, these akills lately simply proofs it. (and yes, it is a matter of your account settings and I’m afraid we can’t tell how that works)
**
So they are still claiming that Elmatador AND Madness simply had weaker accounts even though everything points to the opposite.
Anonymous at 00:16:26 on 15/03:
O great, more ka whining!
Lets look at the facts shall we?
Sigsauer - User Rankings
Rankpoints: #76
Bullets: #170
Madness - User Rankings
Rankpoints: #32
Bullets: #3
They where actually not all that far apart from eachother in rp.
Now, knowing the latter was a GF its unlikely he has full attack bodyguards right?
So, lets for argument sake say he didnt, lets say he had around 150ish (vic+some ike and joe points or the more common vic/ike attack rest deff)
Maybe the target had max attack?
Or the more likely 200?
At this point you can pretty much ignore ks since its likely both accounts had 100 of that so that evens out.
A bf kill can happen, even with #170 bullets your looking at what, 500k?
Thats 500 account strength points from that alone, add another few hundred due to his rp and the target could have easily had 1k point correct?
Add in the account status from the target (Online=strong, offline for 6hours+=strong) and you could explain the situation that way you know.
Sure the shooter had a whole lot more acc points but maybe this ka wasent designed around gathering 2.xmil bullets.
People complained about huggers being to strong the last few rounds and back then you could only get such extremes by doing nothing. Maybe there is just a hardcap on account strength points. Maybe the problem doesn't come from tiredness but from a version where someone with 2.x mil bullets is still only #3.
To summarize: Suck it up; if you dont like the bf risk, dont shoot.
O great, more ka whining!
Lets look at the facts shall we?
Sigsauer - User Rankings
Rankpoints: #76
Bullets: #170
Madness - User Rankings
Rankpoints: #32
Bullets: #3
They where actually not all that far apart from eachother in rp.
Now, knowing the latter was a GF its unlikely he has full attack bodyguards right?
So, lets for argument sake say he didnt, lets say he had around 150ish (vic+some ike and joe points or the more common vic/ike attack rest deff)
Maybe the target had max attack?
Or the more likely 200?
At this point you can pretty much ignore ks since its likely both accounts had 100 of that so that evens out.
A bf kill can happen, even with #170 bullets your looking at what, 500k?
Thats 500 account strength points from that alone, add another few hundred due to his rp and the target could have easily had 1k point correct?
Add in the account status from the target (Online=strong, offline for 6hours+=strong) and you could explain the situation that way you know.
Sure the shooter had a whole lot more acc points but maybe this ka wasent designed around gathering 2.xmil bullets.
People complained about huggers being to strong the last few rounds and back then you could only get such extremes by doing nothing. Maybe there is just a hardcap on account strength points. Maybe the problem doesn't come from tiredness but from a version where someone with 2.x mil bullets is still only #3.
To summarize: Suck it up; if you dont like the bf risk, dont shoot.
I just wanted to get this out of my chest: WTF?
There is NO excuse for such a GF to die in the bf of an online brug, NO EXCUSE.
Anonymous at 17:45:30 on 15/03:
Well, conflict+vinci+quiri+liberta were blooded before anyone even started ranking this version. They made that blood link 1 week before new version started (alhtough vinci+liberta was always a link and conflict+vinci last version was a good bond also).
In the first 2-3 weeks, a lot of turks were on first pages and the so-called Pact didn't seem to stand a chance. After weeks of no war, the made their plans and shot their first enemies down....
If turks played whisely, the pact would never exist ffs...
Just my 3 euro's!
Well, conflict+vinci+quiri+liberta were blooded before anyone even started ranking this version. They made that blood link 1 week before new version started (alhtough vinci+liberta was always a link and conflict+vinci last version was a good bond also).
In the first 2-3 weeks, a lot of turks were on first pages and the so-called Pact didn't seem to stand a chance. After weeks of no war, the made their plans and shot their first enemies down....
If turks played whisely, the pact would never exist ffs...
Just my 3 euro's!
Anonymous (17:45:30 - 15-03)
Giddiness at 17:30:17 on 15/03:
You are being called pussypact because from the start of the version your group hold at least 1/3 of the manpower in the game. You may say you were friends and always fought together, but that would make the game two sided and in order to take you out all other fams should shoot which is hard to say the least :). I see it np to shoot friends.. after all it's game and it should be played to be fun. Too bad not all people see it that way ^_^
ElMariachi at 17:10:35 on 15/03:
And when we shoot a couple of fams its called a gangbang by the pussypact and when a fam like conflict or vinci gets targeted it is a brave move done by a group of heroes ... your point being what ?
rebornn at 16:01:05 on 15/03:
+1
this applies to the SH option as well.
when their enemies go into SH, its called pussy
when they go into SH, its call great tactic mate.
such hypocrisy. well, i guess this is life.
its like u can talk bad about others in rl, but others cant talk bad about u.
nuff said.
Smul at 12:40:47 on 15/03:
It's funny how some people were not bothered at all at the start of the version, when lackey accounts, with the sole purpose of suiciding on top accounts in a war (as supposed to be a set up for the kill by a stronger account), actually killed their targets, top10 accounts killed by #1500 and such. You didn't hear them then, as it was in their favor. Now they have a couple of these cases themselves and everywhere you look (omerta forums, these forums) you see them talking about conspiracies. "Flagged accounts" "Changes in KA". Gotta love the Hypocrisy.
At least have the balls to talk about it in both occasions, and not just when it's bad for yourself.
It's funny how some people were not bothered at all at the start of the version, when lackey accounts, with the sole purpose of suiciding on top accounts in a war (as supposed to be a set up for the kill by a stronger account), actually killed their targets, top10 accounts killed by #1500 and such. You didn't hear them then, as it was in their favor. Now they have a couple of these cases themselves and everywhere you look (omerta forums, these forums) you see them talking about conspiracies. "Flagged accounts" "Changes in KA". Gotta love the Hypocrisy.
At least have the balls to talk about it in both occasions, and not just when it's bad for yourself.
this applies to the SH option as well.
when their enemies go into SH, its called pussy
when they go into SH, its call great tactic mate.
such hypocrisy. well, i guess this is life.
its like u can talk bad about others in rl, but others cant talk bad about u.
nuff said.
And when we shoot a couple of fams its called a gangbang by the pussypact and when a fam like conflict or vinci gets targeted it is a brave move done by a group of heroes ... your point being what ?
Well, conflict+vinci+quiri+liberta were blooded before anyone even started ranking this version. They made that blood link 1 week before new version started (alhtough vinci+liberta was always a link and conflict+vinci last version was a good bond also).
In the first 2-3 weeks, a lot of turks were on first pages and the so-called Pact didn't seem to stand a chance. After weeks of no war, the made their plans and shot their first enemies down....
If turks played whisely, the pact would never exist ffs...
Just my 3 euro's!
ElMariachi at 17:10:35 on 15/03:
And when we shoot a couple of fams its called a gangbang by the pussypact and when a fam like conflict or vinci gets targeted it is a brave move done by a group of heroes ... your point being what ?
rebornn at 16:01:05 on 15/03:
+1
this applies to the SH option as well.
when their enemies go into SH, its called pussy
when they go into SH, its call great tactic mate.
such hypocrisy. well, i guess this is life.
its like u can talk bad about others in rl, but others cant talk bad about u.
nuff said.
Smul at 12:40:47 on 15/03:
It's funny how some people were not bothered at all at the start of the version, when lackey accounts, with the sole purpose of suiciding on top accounts in a war (as supposed to be a set up for the kill by a stronger account), actually killed their targets, top10 accounts killed by #1500 and such. You didn't hear them then, as it was in their favor. Now they have a couple of these cases themselves and everywhere you look (omerta forums, these forums) you see them talking about conspiracies. "Flagged accounts" "Changes in KA". Gotta love the Hypocrisy.
At least have the balls to talk about it in both occasions, and not just when it's bad for yourself.
It's funny how some people were not bothered at all at the start of the version, when lackey accounts, with the sole purpose of suiciding on top accounts in a war (as supposed to be a set up for the kill by a stronger account), actually killed their targets, top10 accounts killed by #1500 and such. You didn't hear them then, as it was in their favor. Now they have a couple of these cases themselves and everywhere you look (omerta forums, these forums) you see them talking about conspiracies. "Flagged accounts" "Changes in KA". Gotta love the Hypocrisy.
At least have the balls to talk about it in both occasions, and not just when it's bad for yourself.
this applies to the SH option as well.
when their enemies go into SH, its called pussy
when they go into SH, its call great tactic mate.
such hypocrisy. well, i guess this is life.
its like u can talk bad about others in rl, but others cant talk bad about u.
nuff said.
And when we shoot a couple of fams its called a gangbang by the pussypact and when a fam like conflict or vinci gets targeted it is a brave move done by a group of heroes ... your point being what ?
rebornn at 16:01:05 on 15/03:
+1
this applies to the SH option as well.
when their enemies go into SH, its called pussy
when they go into SH, its call great tactic mate.
such hypocrisy. well, i guess this is life.
its like u can talk bad about others in rl, but others cant talk bad about u.
nuff said.
Smul at 12:40:47 on 15/03:
It's funny how some people were not bothered at all at the start of the version, when lackey accounts, with the sole purpose of suiciding on top accounts in a war (as supposed to be a set up for the kill by a stronger account), actually killed their targets, top10 accounts killed by #1500 and such. You didn't hear them then, as it was in their favor. Now they have a couple of these cases themselves and everywhere you look (omerta forums, these forums) you see them talking about conspiracies. "Flagged accounts" "Changes in KA". Gotta love the Hypocrisy.
At least have the balls to talk about it in both occasions, and not just when it's bad for yourself.
It's funny how some people were not bothered at all at the start of the version, when lackey accounts, with the sole purpose of suiciding on top accounts in a war (as supposed to be a set up for the kill by a stronger account), actually killed their targets, top10 accounts killed by #1500 and such. You didn't hear them then, as it was in their favor. Now they have a couple of these cases themselves and everywhere you look (omerta forums, these forums) you see them talking about conspiracies. "Flagged accounts" "Changes in KA". Gotta love the Hypocrisy.
At least have the balls to talk about it in both occasions, and not just when it's bad for yourself.
this applies to the SH option as well.
when their enemies go into SH, its called pussy
when they go into SH, its call great tactic mate.
such hypocrisy. well, i guess this is life.
its like u can talk bad about others in rl, but others cant talk bad about u.
nuff said.
And when we shoot a couple of fams its called a gangbang by the pussypact and when a fam like conflict or vinci gets targeted it is a brave move done by a group of heroes ... your point being what ?
Anonymous (16:40:46 - 15-03)
Anonymous at 16:29:06 on 15/03:
What are the rp's of accounts positioned as following?
~#1
~#10
~#100
~#200
~#300
~#400
~#500
What are the rp's of accounts positioned as following?
~#1
~#10
~#100
~#200
~#300
~#400
~#500
#1 is closing in on 800% , #35 was 600% , #400 is around 250%.
Anonymous (16:38:33 - 15-03)
rebornn at 16:01:05 on 15/03:
+1
this applies to the SH option as well.
when their enemies go into SH, its called pussy
when they go into SH, its call great tactic mate.
such hypocrisy. well, i guess this is life.
its like u can talk bad about others in rl, but others cant talk bad about u.
nuff said.
Smul at 12:40:47 on 15/03:
It's funny how some people were not bothered at all at the start of the version, when lackey accounts, with the sole purpose of suiciding on top accounts in a war (as supposed to be a set up for the kill by a stronger account), actually killed their targets, top10 accounts killed by #1500 and such. You didn't hear them then, as it was in their favor. Now they have a couple of these cases themselves and everywhere you look (omerta forums, these forums) you see them talking about conspiracies. "Flagged accounts" "Changes in KA". Gotta love the Hypocrisy.
At least have the balls to talk about it in both occasions, and not just when it's bad for yourself.
It's funny how some people were not bothered at all at the start of the version, when lackey accounts, with the sole purpose of suiciding on top accounts in a war (as supposed to be a set up for the kill by a stronger account), actually killed their targets, top10 accounts killed by #1500 and such. You didn't hear them then, as it was in their favor. Now they have a couple of these cases themselves and everywhere you look (omerta forums, these forums) you see them talking about conspiracies. "Flagged accounts" "Changes in KA". Gotta love the Hypocrisy.
At least have the balls to talk about it in both occasions, and not just when it's bad for yourself.
this applies to the SH option as well.
when their enemies go into SH, its called pussy
when they go into SH, its call great tactic mate.
such hypocrisy. well, i guess this is life.
its like u can talk bad about others in rl, but others cant talk bad about u.
nuff said.
yeah dude , in the beginning of version a top #20 account that is 100% rp with 400k bullets, its rly weird to be killed by a weaker account with 50% rp and 200k bullets... accounts were sooooooo away from eachother, its exactly the same as now with a 600% rp account being GF and having 2.6M bullets that killed loads of GF's and brugs and now dies against a much lower brug , its such hipocrisy!!!!!
God do you 2 see what you are writing being a sore loser rly pushes some ppl to another level when trying to compare things that are not comparable @ all, its rly funny to see your sore ass.
Anonymous (16:29:06 - 15-03)
What are the rp's of accounts positioned as following?
~#1
~#10
~#100
~#200
~#300
~#400
~#500
~#1
~#10
~#100
~#200
~#300
~#400
~#500
rebornn (16:01:05 - 15-03)
Smul at 12:40:47 on 15/03:
It's funny how some people were not bothered at all at the start of the version, when lackey accounts, with the sole purpose of suiciding on top accounts in a war (as supposed to be a set up for the kill by a stronger account), actually killed their targets, top10 accounts killed by #1500 and such. You didn't hear them then, as it was in their favor. Now they have a couple of these cases themselves and everywhere you look (omerta forums, these forums) you see them talking about conspiracies. "Flagged accounts" "Changes in KA". Gotta love the Hypocrisy.
At least have the balls to talk about it in both occasions, and not just when it's bad for yourself.
It's funny how some people were not bothered at all at the start of the version, when lackey accounts, with the sole purpose of suiciding on top accounts in a war (as supposed to be a set up for the kill by a stronger account), actually killed their targets, top10 accounts killed by #1500 and such. You didn't hear them then, as it was in their favor. Now they have a couple of these cases themselves and everywhere you look (omerta forums, these forums) you see them talking about conspiracies. "Flagged accounts" "Changes in KA". Gotta love the Hypocrisy.
At least have the balls to talk about it in both occasions, and not just when it's bad for yourself.
this applies to the SH option as well.
when their enemies go into SH, its called pussy
when they go into SH, its call great tactic mate.
such hypocrisy. well, i guess this is life.
its like u can talk bad about others in rl, but others cant talk bad about u.
nuff said.
Anonymous (15:55:49 - 15-03)
Smul at 12:40:47 on 15/03:
It's funny how some people were not bothered at all at the start of the version, when lackey accounts, with the sole purpose of suiciding on top accounts in a war (as supposed to be a set up for the kill by a stronger account), actually killed their targets, top10 accounts killed by #1500 and such. You didn't hear them then, as it was in their favor. Now they have a couple of these cases themselves and everywhere you look (omerta forums, these forums) you see them talking about conspiracies. "Flagged accounts" "Changes in KA". Gotta love the Hypocrisy.
At least have the balls to talk about it in both occasions, and not just when it's bad for yourself.
It's funny how some people were not bothered at all at the start of the version, when lackey accounts, with the sole purpose of suiciding on top accounts in a war (as supposed to be a set up for the kill by a stronger account), actually killed their targets, top10 accounts killed by #1500 and such. You didn't hear them then, as it was in their favor. Now they have a couple of these cases themselves and everywhere you look (omerta forums, these forums) you see them talking about conspiracies. "Flagged accounts" "Changes in KA". Gotta love the Hypocrisy.
At least have the balls to talk about it in both occasions, and not just when it's bad for yourself.
As much as I would want to agree with you difference back then couldn't be that big. at most 100-150% RP and 150-200k bullets, while now difference can be off the roof.
In 1st war it's normal for kills like that to happen. This would be like you dying with your Pepino account in 3.0 against some 200% brug.
Further more this isn't 1st time in 3.1 I remember #3 in game Brug dying from Chief before 1st war, difference was over 100% and bullets over 300k.
Anonymous (15:07:17 - 15-03)
Smul at 12:40:47 on 15/03:
It's funny how some people were not bothered at all at the start of the version, when lackey accounts, with the sole purpose of suiciding on top accounts in a war (as supposed to be a set up for the kill by a stronger account), actually killed their targets, top10 accounts killed by #1500 and such. You didn't hear them then, as it was in their favor. Now they have a couple of these cases themselves and everywhere you look (omerta forums, these forums) you see them talking about conspiracies. "Flagged accounts" "Changes in KA". Gotta love the Hypocrisy.
At least have the balls to talk about it in both occasions, and not just when it's bad for yourself.
It's funny how some people were not bothered at all at the start of the version, when lackey accounts, with the sole purpose of suiciding on top accounts in a war (as supposed to be a set up for the kill by a stronger account), actually killed their targets, top10 accounts killed by #1500 and such. You didn't hear them then, as it was in their favor. Now they have a couple of these cases themselves and everywhere you look (omerta forums, these forums) you see them talking about conspiracies. "Flagged accounts" "Changes in KA". Gotta love the Hypocrisy.
At least have the balls to talk about it in both occasions, and not just when it's bad for yourself.
this was just retarded. What exactly are you comparing ?
Mobtour at 13:25:13 on 15/03:
ka is fucked game is fucked give me 1 reason to play
ka is fucked game is fucked give me 1 reason to play
SCU :o
anonymous (13:17:54 - 15-03)
I heard that Vengeance was not targetted by liberta+ coz Swat would jump in for veng, but not vise versa..
Guess that makes Vengeance next for Liberta to hit :)
Guess that makes Vengeance next for Liberta to hit :)
Anonymous (13:15:14 - 15-03)
what a poor war...
It's funny how some people were not bothered at all at the start of the version, when lackey accounts, with the sole purpose of suiciding on top accounts in a war (as supposed to be a set up for the kill by a stronger account), actually killed their targets, top10 accounts killed by #1500 and such. You didn't hear them then, as it was in their favor. Now they have a couple of these cases themselves and everywhere you look (omerta forums, these forums) you see them talking about conspiracies. "Flagged accounts" "Changes in KA". Gotta love the Hypocrisy.
At least have the balls to talk about it in both occasions, and not just when it's bad for yourself.
At least have the balls to talk about it in both occasions, and not just when it's bad for yourself.