» Menu
» OB/Site News
» Articles
» Barafranca News
Ravenger
12-07 War!
20:02:28 - 14-07
Anonymous at 17:55:16 on 14/07:
will die in chief bf
Provenio at 16:14:55 on 14/07:
I wonder what the Capodecina rank will do in the KA
I wonder what the Capodecina rank will do in the KA
will die in chief bf
+1
General Comments & Major Rumors
17:04:40 - 13-07
Arcanine at 16:55:04 on 13/07:
Then the Chief must have messed up with his bodyguards. A decent chief who shoots 60k with attacking bodyguard wiould have killed you easily if you were full attack.
Ravenger at 16:29:01 on 13/07:
Well i'm a brug, was trained full attack, offline in not my home city, not in villa etc. Got shot by a chief with 60k bullets, survived and killed him in BF. To me, that makes brugs seem a lot stronger than chiefs when defending, but not when attacking.
Well i'm a brug, was trained full attack, offline in not my home city, not in villa etc. Got shot by a chief with 60k bullets, survived and killed him in BF. To me, that makes brugs seem a lot stronger than chiefs when defending, but not when attacking.
Then the Chief must have messed up with his bodyguards. A decent chief who shoots 60k with attacking bodyguard wiould have killed you easily if you were full attack.
well i was #2 overall..
General Comments & Major Rumors
16:29:01 - 13-07
JTR|NotLoggedIn at 16:25:03 on 13/07:
If that's the case, then I do agree, it's a problem. People should ofc. not die every single time, they were shot at - especially not, if the shooter is way weaker. But I still think it's too early to conclude anything - these wars were mainly between chiefs and low brugs.
Arcanine at 16:17:18 on 13/07:
It all leads to the Bruglione rank being too weak from the start off. Before you have enough account strength to shoot safely you need to have atleast 400k or so more bullets than your opponent or so..that is not realistic. Apparently only backfire has been modified to be a little stronger.
But that did not solve the problem of people dying too easily..not talking about backfire kills but defending.
JTR|NotLoggedIn at 15:46:05 on 13/07:
I haven't played for a while and have just returned a bit, but I still wonder if it isn't too early to conclude something and trip all out? This is still the beginning of the version, which means that a difference of 60k bullets between two account might actually mean, that the difference in bulletsposition becomes unnaturally big, since a lot of people will have something in between - but overall then 60k isn't that big a difference in account strenght, hence the account with the high bullets position won't have that big an advantage as the numbers dictate. Same goes for all the other stats.
Maybe we should wait a bit to conclude something, untill the differences in stats actually reflect a big difference, and if the same still occurs, then it's ok to bitch - then I even agree. :-)
It was your own choice to start wars right in the beginning of the version (and it seems like it was the case in all the last versions so nothing new), so you can't bitch about the KA, before there actually is a significant difference in strength of the accounts you compare. If you had waited a few weeks before you attacked, then the outcome might have been different, but you decided to rush these wars through, hence you might have been served as deserved....
I haven't played for a while and have just returned a bit, but I still wonder if it isn't too early to conclude something and trip all out? This is still the beginning of the version, which means that a difference of 60k bullets between two account might actually mean, that the difference in bulletsposition becomes unnaturally big, since a lot of people will have something in between - but overall then 60k isn't that big a difference in account strenght, hence the account with the high bullets position won't have that big an advantage as the numbers dictate. Same goes for all the other stats.
Maybe we should wait a bit to conclude something, untill the differences in stats actually reflect a big difference, and if the same still occurs, then it's ok to bitch - then I even agree. :-)
It was your own choice to start wars right in the beginning of the version (and it seems like it was the case in all the last versions so nothing new), so you can't bitch about the KA, before there actually is a significant difference in strength of the accounts you compare. If you had waited a few weeks before you attacked, then the outcome might have been different, but you decided to rush these wars through, hence you might have been served as deserved....
It all leads to the Bruglione rank being too weak from the start off. Before you have enough account strength to shoot safely you need to have atleast 400k or so more bullets than your opponent or so..that is not realistic. Apparently only backfire has been modified to be a little stronger.
But that did not solve the problem of people dying too easily..not talking about backfire kills but defending.
If that's the case, then I do agree, it's a problem. People should ofc. not die every single time, they were shot at - especially not, if the shooter is way weaker. But I still think it's too early to conclude anything - these wars were mainly between chiefs and low brugs.
Well i'm a brug, was trained full attack, offline in not my home city, not in villa etc. Got shot by a chief with 60k bullets, survived and killed him in BF. To me, that makes brugs seem a lot stronger than chiefs when defending, but not when attacking.
General Comments & Major Rumors
09:27:53 - 13-07
Anonymous at 09:24:25 on 13/07:
I haven't seen you say anything positive since you came crawling into this game.
You are a negative nancy
:w
Ravenger at 09:17:33 on 13/07:
nice testing, bugs and still unkillable players! GG.
nice testing, bugs and still unkillable players! GG.
I haven't seen you say anything positive since you came crawling into this game.
You are a negative nancy
:w
Oh says the bigman anonymous, great job with that :D