OB News - General Comments & Major Rumors

ffs (20:53:02 - 03-02)

Family: Worth:
1 Conflict 7,379
2 Marangello 5,992
3 Marazzino 5,954
4 Vincitori 5,738
5 Quirites 5,624

wtf is that fam worths :/

and those pussypacts :\

Hugging at its very best :|

shell (20:38:34 - 03-02)

Why do you feel like you gotta point at them being turks ? i am turkish as well :P and you name us in so called pact and then claim that there will be wars between pact as well. Don't you see your point fails at each line ? if you are the same anon guy with previous ones :P

Anonymous (20:32:09 - 03-02)

shell at 20:27:04 on 03/02:
and 1 guy claims that righelli (us) will get shot. Well that is highly possible, i agree on that. It might be on the otherway as well. Sooo. While it is the case, how could you still claim that version is over ? :P tension is as high as in the begining for us :D

There is no tension. The big pact has twice the intelligence, resources and bykkets than all the turkish noobs like Turkuz, yighidos etc. combined.

shell (20:27:04 - 03-02)

and 1 guy claims that righelli (us) will get shot. Well that is highly possible, i agree on that. It might be on the otherway as well. Sooo. While it is the case, how could you still claim that version is over ? :P tension is as high as in the begining for us :D

shell (20:25:33 - 03-02)

you guys name at least 7 - 8 wars scenarios and then claim that version is already over. Isn't that confusing ? As the versions changed, people's expectations grow more than the game's potential as it seems. You can't have a game there will be war every week and this might go on for months. There are just not enough people for that and has never been that much people. In old times big wars would mean, at this time of the version, killing 7 - 8 brugs and 20-30 chiefs and even back then organising a war to kill that much high ranks weren't that easy. Imagine it now. Fams are full of high ranks and killing them all would take a lot of onliners in shooting side. Just read the game right and determine your expectations based on game's reality and dynamics. If you want a game with big wars every weak, stop crying us a river here and make the game as you pleased as it is possible.

microbi (20:12:12 - 03-02)

Rix at 12:28:25 on 03/02:

Anonymous at 09:21:53 on 03/02:
conf co. closed the version. reset!!

Let's do the math, shall we?

I defined "conf co." as Vincitori and all their bloods they have on the family page. This gives the following 10 families:

Conflict, Gravano, Liberta, Tremps, Guantanamo, Marangello, Quirites, Equites, Venture and of course Vincitori itself.

Totally they have:

81 swins - 100 assa's - 135 lc's - 160 chiefs - 709 brugs - 0 cd's - 10 gf's - 12056 points

According to our live famstats, there are a total of 2063 brugs in families and 28 without, giving 2091 in this game total.

Because "conf. co" has 709 brugs out of those, they have about 33.9% of the brugs in the game.

This means 1382 brugs can be used against them, a ratio of about 1.95:1.

I'll leave the conclusions over this data to the rest of you.

Those 700+ brugs will defend as 1 but will those 1350+ attack as one? Don't think so....

Carnivale (20:09:06 - 03-02)

Make hay, not war!

Grouphug everyone?

Nooti

(20:03:09 - 03-02)

And for those who are making rumours all day there will be 2 , 3 more wars until the end of the ver. face it vinci and co are unbeatable 100 % ks lots of bullets etc etc ! you should've acted earlier but u huged like fucking bitchez and now version is super lame its like playing a game with cheats u make 1000 milion in 2 days and there are 4 fams controling the game THINK NEXT TIME U STUPID FUCKS dont hug but fucking shoot and you've got nothing to lose either they shoot you and kill you in about 1 hour or you shoot them and at least make some damage and avoid the fucking bashing u get here !

as for vinci and co as much as i dislike them i gotta hand it to them they did a good job they were smart and played smart !

READ THIS BITCH ASS HUGGER FAMS !

Nooti

(19:44:56 - 03-02)

Rix at 12:28:25 on 03/02:

Anonymous at 09:21:53 on 03/02:
conf co. closed the version. reset!!

Let's do the math, shall we?

I defined "conf co." as Vincitori and all their bloods they have on the family page. This gives the following 10 families:

Conflict, Gravano, Liberta, Tremps, Guantanamo, Marangello, Quirites, Equites, Venture and of course Vincitori itself.

Totally they have:

81 swins - 100 assa's - 135 lc's - 160 chiefs - 709 brugs - 0 cd's - 10 gf's - 12056 points

According to our live famstats, there are a total of 2063 brugs in families and 28 without, giving 2091 in this game total.

Because "conf. co" has 709 brugs out of those, they have about 33.9% of the brugs in the game.

This means 1382 brugs can be used against them, a ratio of about 1.95:1.

I'll leave the conclusions over this data to the rest of you.

therre's something u forget rix .. KS ! they will all die in BF !

kerzakov (19:05:42 - 03-02)

holla at 18:21:16 on 03/02:

Anonymous at 18:09:52 on 03/02:

holla at 18:00:29 on 03/02:
Syndrum&Laboratory+Yalta+Xzone+Purgatory+
Vengance+Bruinsma+Gelibolu+Turkuz+
Ygidos/Blacksea
VS
Conflict

tonight 19OT

Ur so not funny.

ur not nice

+1

holla (18:21:16 - 03-02)

Anonymous at 18:09:52 on 03/02:

holla at 18:00:29 on 03/02:
Syndrum&Laboratory+Yalta+Xzone+Purgatory+
Vengance+Bruinsma+Gelibolu+Turkuz+
Ygidos/Blacksea
VS
Conflict

tonight 19OT

Ur so not funny.

ur not nice

Anonymous (18:09:52 - 03-02)

holla at 18:00:29 on 03/02:
Syndrum&Laboratory+Yalta+Xzone+Purgatory+
Vengance+Bruinsma+Gelibolu+Turkuz+
Ygidos/Blacksea
VS
Conflict

tonight 19OT

Ur so not funny.

holla (18:00:29 - 03-02)

Syndrum&Laboratory+Yalta+Xzone+Purgatory+
Vengance+Bruinsma+Gelibolu+Turkuz+
Ygidos/Blacksea
VS
Conflict

tonight 19OT

zenga (17:38:44 - 03-02)

Anonymous at 14:09:55 on 03/02:

Besides you forgot to add conf's other bloods either. like as Aztec and Righelli.
Yalta and Hangover are also so close to Affi fams. which means the version is already over.
and i can tell you the next wars in an order :
conf co + vinci co shoots turkuz & yb

then

conf co + vinci co and more fams shoots lab/syndrum + correptio + purgatory

then

conflict +quirities + aztec + righelli + xzone + venture shoots maraz + kuro + carneglia + krays

then

vinci + liberta team + yalta + hangover shoots aztec and righelli

and version is over ;)

I'm not up to date, but I'm pretty sure that if this scenario would happen, and righelli gets shot, the version ain't over, as you state it :)

Kapow

(15:28:43 - 03-02)

Why cant we all just get along? :D:D

FlowzZ

(15:27:26 - 03-02)

Anonymous at 13:14:22 on 03/02:

Rix at 12:28:25 on 03/02:

This means 1382 brugs can be used against them, a ratio of about 1.95:1.

I'll leave the conclusions over this data to the rest of you.

33.9% of all the brugs on 1 side is a retarded version.
Even if you manage to gather ALL of the others fams (which never ever ever happens, you should be lucky to get half of them, if that) you still have to shoot ~2:1.
Any half decent top would try to plan a war at-least 4-5:1 if they can manage, up to 7 to be safe.
If those 700 brugs are literally 1 giant group you might as well reset since that wont change the outcome. And the included fams would seriously need to reconsider their priorities. Winning isnt everything.
That said i don't believe in such a massive block since i think these giant groups have the tendency to implode due to arguments between 'the pact' etc but sofar this has to be the worst version known to date.

O and before people respond 'step up and do something about it!!':
Just because someone has an different opinion about your playing style doesn't mean he has to fix the fucked up situation you created.
You created it; You fix it. Or is it all about 'winning'?

Hypocrites , for once in your life you couldn't manage to gangbang your enemies and you spend 50% of your time on this site bashing and bashing and creating illusions in your head and trying to plant them into other's head , you don't stop for a moment and consider that any of those fams who got killed made shitlouds of enemies in last version(s) due to same way of playing , same way as you're saying "is it all about winning" " where is the honor" , oh where was your honor before when you actually had the power , and no there is no pact ,differ from some last version tops who actually claimed in OB that some fams work close together and were in a good position , none of them considered themselves pact nor felt bad for their playstyle , but once someone treats them with same respect they show how hypocrites they are , and yeh i'd actually like you to consider being violent ingame while fams are still up instead of this nonsense in forums cuz its getting old .
I'll end it with "It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of nonviolence to cover impotence."
You can google who said that ofc .

Regards

Anonymous (15:13:37 - 03-02)

Anonymous at 13:14:22 on 03/02:

Rix at 12:28:25 on 03/02:

This means 1382 brugs can be used against them, a ratio of about 1.95:1.

I'll leave the conclusions over this data to the rest of you.

33.9% of all the brugs on 1 side is a retarded version.
Even if you manage to gather ALL of the others fams (which never ever ever happens, you should be lucky to get half of them, if that) you still have to shoot ~2:1.
Any half decent top would try to plan a war at-least 4-5:1 if they can manage, up to 7 to be safe.
If those 700 brugs are literally 1 giant group you might as well reset since that wont change the outcome. And the included fams would seriously need to reconsider their priorities. Winning isnt everything.
That said i don't believe in such a massive block since i think these giant groups have the tendency to implode due to arguments between 'the pact' etc but sofar this has to be the worst version known to date.

O and before people respond 'step up and do something about it!!':
Just because someone has an different opinion about your playing style doesn't mean he has to fix the fucked up situation you created.
You created it; You fix it. Or is it all about 'winning'?

by calling this the worst version to date, you clearly started playing this version... or you have a very bad memory.

Anonymous (14:48:44 - 03-02)

Anonymous at 14:09:55 on 03/02:

Rix at 13:49:15 on 03/02:

Anonymous at 13:14:22 on 03/02:

Rix at 12:28:25 on 03/02:

This means 1382 brugs can be used against them, a ratio of about 1.95:1.

I'll leave the conclusions over this data to the rest of you.

33.9% of all the brugs on 1 side is a retarded version.
Even if you manage to gather ALL of the others fams (which never ever ever happens, you should be lucky to get half of them, if that) you still have to shoot ~2:1.
Any half decent top would try to plan a war at-least 4-5:1 if they can manage, up to 7 to be safe.
If those 700 brugs are literally 1 giant group you might as well reset since that wont change the outcome. And the included fams would seriously need to reconsider their priorities. Winning isnt everything.
That said i don't believe in such a massive block since i think these giant groups have the tendency to implode due to arguments between 'the pact' etc but sofar this has to be the worst version known to date.

O and before people respond 'step up and do something about it!!':
Just because someone has an different opinion about your playing style doesn't mean he has to fix the fucked up situation you created.
You created it; You fix it. Or is it all about 'winning'?

Agree.

There is another fact by the way which may help the families thinking about attacking:

In all three wars we've had till now in this version, the attackers lost about half of the amount of brugs they needed to shot. If that's due to the high ratio's in those wars I don't know, but that would mean the shooters to shoot Conflict & co would lose about 350 brugs (about 1/3rd of all the brugs all the remaining families have together).

Besides you forgot to add conf's other bloods either. like as Aztec and Righelli.

Yalta and Hangover are also so close to Affi fams. which means the version is already over.

and i can tell you the next wars in an order :

conf co + vinci co shoots turkuz & yb

then

conf co + vinci co and more fams shoots lab/syndrum + correptio + purgatory

then

conflict +quirities + aztec + righelli + xzone + venture shoots maraz + kuro + carneglia + krays

then

vinci + liberta team + yalta + hangover shoots aztec and righelli

and version is over ;)

+ 1

Audiowaste

(14:27:44 - 03-02)

Well well well Nostradamus

Anonymous (14:09:55 - 03-02)

Rix at 13:49:15 on 03/02:

Anonymous at 13:14:22 on 03/02:

Rix at 12:28:25 on 03/02:

This means 1382 brugs can be used against them, a ratio of about 1.95:1.

I'll leave the conclusions over this data to the rest of you.

33.9% of all the brugs on 1 side is a retarded version.
Even if you manage to gather ALL of the others fams (which never ever ever happens, you should be lucky to get half of them, if that) you still have to shoot ~2:1.
Any half decent top would try to plan a war at-least 4-5:1 if they can manage, up to 7 to be safe.
If those 700 brugs are literally 1 giant group you might as well reset since that wont change the outcome. And the included fams would seriously need to reconsider their priorities. Winning isnt everything.
That said i don't believe in such a massive block since i think these giant groups have the tendency to implode due to arguments between 'the pact' etc but sofar this has to be the worst version known to date.

O and before people respond 'step up and do something about it!!':
Just because someone has an different opinion about your playing style doesn't mean he has to fix the fucked up situation you created.
You created it; You fix it. Or is it all about 'winning'?

Agree.

There is another fact by the way which may help the families thinking about attacking:

In all three wars we've had till now in this version, the attackers lost about half of the amount of brugs they needed to shot. If that's due to the high ratio's in those wars I don't know, but that would mean the shooters to shoot Conflict & co would lose about 350 brugs (about 1/3rd of all the brugs all the remaining families have together).

Besides you forgot to add conf's other bloods either. like as Aztec and Righelli.

Yalta and Hangover are also so close to Affi fams. which means the version is already over.

and i can tell you the next wars in an order :

conf co + vinci co shoots turkuz & yb

then

conf co + vinci co and more fams shoots lab/syndrum + correptio + purgatory

then

conflict +quirities + aztec + righelli + xzone + venture shoots maraz + kuro + carneglia + krays

then

vinci + liberta team + yalta + hangover shoots aztec and righelli

and version is over ;)