» Menu
» OB/Site News
» Articles
 |
» Barafranca News
No news found. Reset in progress?
 |
|
article
General Comments & Major Rumors section.
Everyone knows where this section is for, keep it clean from flaming and only posts in english are allowed.
Everyone knows where this section is for, keep it clean from flaming and only posts in english are allowed.
Anonymous (22:03:44 - 09-01)
anoniempje (19:09:06 - 09-01)
good boy rokii
anoniempje at 18:52:23 on 09/01:
rokii i hope with youre mommy :D:D
rokii i hope with youre mommy :D:D
Try again. And now with a proper use of ''You're'' and ''Your''.
Maybe I'll laugh, when that time comes.
anoniempje (18:52:23 - 09-01)
rokii i hope with youre mommy :D:D
Anonymous (18:33:22 - 09-01)
gaytori having problems with palermo BF ROFLMAO
Rokii at 18:14:39 on 09/01:
Yes, in my pants. Wooooohoooo!
anoniempje at 18:06:19 on 09/01:
will there be some action tonite ??
will there be some action tonite ??
Yes, in my pants. Wooooohoooo!
hope im invited! \o/
anoniempje at 18:06:19 on 09/01:
will there be some action tonite ??
will there be some action tonite ??
Yes, in my pants. Wooooohoooo!
anoniempje (18:06:19 - 09-01)
will there be some action tonite ??
PannaJunk at 15:46:55 on 09/01:
you're not even trying to come up with cool names dont you ?
Anonymous at 15:35:52 on 09/01:
gaytori bb :w
gaytori bb :w
you're not even trying to come up with cool names dont you ?
neh he is just trying to encourage others :)
Anonymous at 15:35:52 on 09/01:
gaytori bb :w
gaytori bb :w
you're not even trying to come up with cool names dont you ?
Anonymous (15:35:52 - 09-01)
gaytori bb :w
Anonymous (15:22:48 - 09-01)
Battalgazi at 06:48:48 on 09/01:
+1 im not goin anywhere :) im still a Maraz hugger :p
What at 03:48:03 on 09/01:
You are an idiot.. Retard beyond limits.. That Battal is a noob kid from GEN.TR.. Battalgazi is still in Maraz..
Dont hate Maraz hate me fagot!
Anonymous at 02:44:48 on 09/01:
People left Marazzino 1 by 1.. now Battalgazi who was their famous war commander left maraz, and now top3 in sacrifice ..
the hugger marazino will hug their account more after now..
now they are w8ing thier dead time..
Every sinlge seconds ticking for conflict power, and they will use their war experience and remember their big old dayss..
1 more Round and marazino will down ;)
People left Marazzino 1 by 1.. now Battalgazi who was their famous war commander left maraz, and now top3 in sacrifice ..
the hugger marazino will hug their account more after now..
now they are w8ing thier dead time..
Every sinlge seconds ticking for conflict power, and they will use their war experience and remember their big old dayss..
1 more Round and marazino will down ;)
You are an idiot.. Retard beyond limits.. That Battal is a noob kid from GEN.TR.. Battalgazi is still in Maraz..
Dont hate Maraz hate me fagot!
+1 im not goin anywhere :) im still a Maraz hugger :p
http://i51.tinypic.com/2qdamxi.jpg ---> calm down.
Batta (11:54:16 - 09-01)
Rix at 10:10:19 on 09/01:
It's actually very simple:
Back in the old days, mr. Fingon used the Fibonacci sequence to give points to soldier+, and his "formula" we still use basicly everywhere because it works so well (you can still find it on live famstats, on war report at the deaths, etc).
However, in this case this couldn't be used. Because we wanted to make every rank count, and not just soldiers and higher (because ES dupes can also be used for shady reasons), and the Fibonacci sequence in that case would give one point to an ES while give 1597 points to a GF, and we found a factor of 1597 to be too high for the difference between lowest and highest rank.
So, we had to think of a new formula. We talked about ideas like dividing all numbers by 10 or grouping lowranks in group of two (so ES and DB would get same points, Pic and Shop as well, etc.), but in that first case the factor of 1597 would still exist and in the second case not all promotions would count anymore, not something we were glad with.
Because I've made up formulas for mathemetical problems and computer programs before (they are really handy in game engine development), I knew using a basic factor between 1.2 and 1.6 works very well in these ocassions (for instance, with basic factor of 1.5 you get 2, 3, 4.5, 6.8, 10 (rounded to one decimal)). Because raising to the power of is used (for instance, 1.5 ^ 3 would give the factor for rank 3), I knew that, because of it's basic nature of the number, √(2) would work very well as a good factor (is around 1.41, so was a perfectly good number within the range I was thinking of), and luckily it does (if you look at the number sequence, you can see the traditional powers of 2 between the decimal numbers like 2, 4, 8, 16, etc.). Using rank - 1 and multiplier 0.5 are just simple ways to shift the formula in such a way that it gives a nice sequence without too high numbers (staying under the three digits per rank).
So now we have a sequence which in its progression looks very much alike Fibonacci's sequence (for instance, GF is over twice as high as Brug, just like it was in the old sequence), which works from ES and up instead of Soldier and up, and which only has a factor of 181 between ES and GF, instead of 1597. The only downside is that we have decimals now, but we can live with that.
Battalgazi at 06:46:54 on 09/01:
u missed a point actually , simple or complex if you create a formula for something , u should explain its components and also its logic.
but in Rix' case , i agree with you , he can use any logic without a consistent explanation.
Josephc at 02:53:14 on 09/01:
Before you start calling people names:
1. An algorithm is simply a definition of rules by which some result will be determined. There is no mathematical proof available for any algorithm, as long as it follows the logical rules of mathematics then it is a valid algorithm. Rix (and OBNews) has decided that 0.5 * (√(2) ^ (rank - 1)) will be equal to the points for a family's standing on the Hall of Shame, and therefore it is so.
2. There is no mathematical proof that F=ma, as it is a formula hypothesized after scientific research and cannot be proved using any mathematical theorems.
3. F=ma only applies in a limited range of scenarios anyway, and so therefore could never be "proved" in the mathematical sense because it has proven to be false via observation under certain circumstances.
bafrali at 02:02:51 on 09/01:
lol Mr. Illiterate, have u heard that proof of any equation? Newton didnt make up F=m*a from his ass
Redspeert at 01:35:38 on 09/01:
Its called math, maybe you've heard about it?
bafrali at 01:12:11 on 09/01:
it is a joke? or prove that how u got that formula
Rix at 23:18:39 on 08/01:
We've adjusted the algorithm used to calculate the points at the hall of shame. It uses the following formula now:
0.5 * (√(2) ^ (rank - 1))
We will also add some code to give more points for top 3 or capo's than normal members.
We've adjusted the algorithm used to calculate the points at the hall of shame. It uses the following formula now:
0.5 * (√(2) ^ (rank - 1))
We will also add some code to give more points for top 3 or capo's than normal members.
it is a joke? or prove that how u got that formula
Its called math, maybe you've heard about it?
lol Mr. Illiterate, have u heard that proof of any equation? Newton didnt make up F=m*a from his ass
Before you start calling people names:
1. An algorithm is simply a definition of rules by which some result will be determined. There is no mathematical proof available for any algorithm, as long as it follows the logical rules of mathematics then it is a valid algorithm. Rix (and OBNews) has decided that 0.5 * (√(2) ^ (rank - 1)) will be equal to the points for a family's standing on the Hall of Shame, and therefore it is so.
2. There is no mathematical proof that F=ma, as it is a formula hypothesized after scientific research and cannot be proved using any mathematical theorems.
3. F=ma only applies in a limited range of scenarios anyway, and so therefore could never be "proved" in the mathematical sense because it has proven to be false via observation under certain circumstances.
u missed a point actually , simple or complex if you create a formula for something , u should explain its components and also its logic.
but in Rix' case , i agree with you , he can use any logic without a consistent explanation.
Back in the old days, mr. Fingon used the Fibonacci sequence to give points to soldier+, and his "formula" we still use basicly everywhere because it works so well (you can still find it on live famstats, on war report at the deaths, etc).
However, in this case this couldn't be used. Because we wanted to make every rank count, and not just soldiers and higher (because ES dupes can also be used for shady reasons), and the Fibonacci sequence in that case would give one point to an ES while give 1597 points to a GF, and we found a factor of 1597 to be too high for the difference between lowest and highest rank.
So, we had to think of a new formula. We talked about ideas like dividing all numbers by 10 or grouping lowranks in group of two (so ES and DB would get same points, Pic and Shop as well, etc.), but in that first case the factor of 1597 would still exist and in the second case not all promotions would count anymore, not something we were glad with.
Because I've made up formulas for mathemetical problems and computer programs before (they are really handy in game engine development), I knew using a basic factor between 1.2 and 1.6 works very well in these ocassions (for instance, with basic factor of 1.5 you get 2, 3, 4.5, 6.8, 10 (rounded to one decimal)). Because raising to the power of is used (for instance, 1.5 ^ 3 would give the factor for rank 3), I knew that, because of it's basic nature of the number, √(2) would work very well as a good factor (is around 1.41, so was a perfectly good number within the range I was thinking of), and luckily it does (if you look at the number sequence, you can see the traditional powers of 2 between the decimal numbers like 2, 4, 8, 16, etc.). Using rank - 1 and multiplier 0.5 are just simple ways to shift the formula in such a way that it gives a nice sequence without too high numbers (staying under the three digits per rank).
So now we have a sequence which in its progression looks very much alike Fibonacci's sequence (for instance, GF is over twice as high as Brug, just like it was in the old sequence), which works from ES and up instead of Soldier and up, and which only has a factor of 181 between ES and GF, instead of 1597. The only downside is that we have decimals now, but we can live with that.
thank you for the explanation :) rounding is a general problem for all kind of programs so we used to that.
bafrali here is your answer babe ;)
Battalgazi at 06:46:54 on 09/01:
u missed a point actually , simple or complex if you create a formula for something , u should explain its components and also its logic.
but in Rix' case , i agree with you , he can use any logic without a consistent explanation.
Josephc at 02:53:14 on 09/01:
Before you start calling people names:
1. An algorithm is simply a definition of rules by which some result will be determined. There is no mathematical proof available for any algorithm, as long as it follows the logical rules of mathematics then it is a valid algorithm. Rix (and OBNews) has decided that 0.5 * (√(2) ^ (rank - 1)) will be equal to the points for a family's standing on the Hall of Shame, and therefore it is so.
2. There is no mathematical proof that F=ma, as it is a formula hypothesized after scientific research and cannot be proved using any mathematical theorems.
3. F=ma only applies in a limited range of scenarios anyway, and so therefore could never be "proved" in the mathematical sense because it has proven to be false via observation under certain circumstances.
bafrali at 02:02:51 on 09/01:
lol Mr. Illiterate, have u heard that proof of any equation? Newton didnt make up F=m*a from his ass
Redspeert at 01:35:38 on 09/01:
Its called math, maybe you've heard about it?
bafrali at 01:12:11 on 09/01:
it is a joke? or prove that how u got that formula
Rix at 23:18:39 on 08/01:
We've adjusted the algorithm used to calculate the points at the hall of shame. It uses the following formula now:
0.5 * (√(2) ^ (rank - 1))
We will also add some code to give more points for top 3 or capo's than normal members.
We've adjusted the algorithm used to calculate the points at the hall of shame. It uses the following formula now:
0.5 * (√(2) ^ (rank - 1))
We will also add some code to give more points for top 3 or capo's than normal members.
it is a joke? or prove that how u got that formula
Its called math, maybe you've heard about it?
lol Mr. Illiterate, have u heard that proof of any equation? Newton didnt make up F=m*a from his ass
Before you start calling people names:
1. An algorithm is simply a definition of rules by which some result will be determined. There is no mathematical proof available for any algorithm, as long as it follows the logical rules of mathematics then it is a valid algorithm. Rix (and OBNews) has decided that 0.5 * (√(2) ^ (rank - 1)) will be equal to the points for a family's standing on the Hall of Shame, and therefore it is so.
2. There is no mathematical proof that F=ma, as it is a formula hypothesized after scientific research and cannot be proved using any mathematical theorems.
3. F=ma only applies in a limited range of scenarios anyway, and so therefore could never be "proved" in the mathematical sense because it has proven to be false via observation under certain circumstances.
u missed a point actually , simple or complex if you create a formula for something , u should explain its components and also its logic.
but in Rix' case , i agree with you , he can use any logic without a consistent explanation.
Back in the old days, mr. Fingon used the Fibonacci sequence to give points to soldier+, and his "formula" we still use basicly everywhere because it works so well (you can still find it on live famstats, on war report at the deaths, etc).
However, in this case this couldn't be used. Because we wanted to make every rank count, and not just soldiers and higher (because ES dupes can also be used for shady reasons), and the Fibonacci sequence in that case would give one point to an ES while give 1597 points to a GF, and we found a factor of 1597 to be too high for the difference between lowest and highest rank.
So, we had to think of a new formula. We talked about ideas like dividing all numbers by 10 or grouping lowranks in group of two (so ES and DB would get same points, Pic and Shop as well, etc.), but in that first case the factor of 1597 would still exist and in the second case not all promotions would count anymore, not something we were glad with.
Because I've made up formulas for mathemetical problems and computer programs before (they are really handy in game engine development), I knew using a basic factor between 1.2 and 1.6 works very well in these ocassions (for instance, with basic factor of 1.5 you get 2, 3, 4.5, 6.8, 10 (rounded to one decimal)). Because raising to the power of is used (for instance, 1.5 ^ 3 would give the factor for rank 3), I knew that, because of it's basic nature of the number, √(2) would work very well as a good factor (is around 1.41, so was a perfectly good number within the range I was thinking of), and luckily it does (if you look at the number sequence, you can see the traditional powers of 2 between the decimal numbers like 2, 4, 8, 16, etc.). Using rank - 1 and multiplier 0.5 are just simple ways to shift the formula in such a way that it gives a nice sequence without too high numbers (staying under the three digits per rank).
So now we have a sequence which in its progression looks very much alike Fibonacci's sequence (for instance, GF is over twice as high as Brug, just like it was in the old sequence), which works from ES and up instead of Soldier and up, and which only has a factor of 181 between ES and GF, instead of 1597. The only downside is that we have decimals now, but we can live with that.
Anonymous (07:38:19 - 09-01)
Battalgazi at 06:46:54 on 09/01:
u missed a point actually , simple or complex if you create a formula for something , u should explain its components and also its logic.
but in Rix' case , i agree with you , he can use any logic without a consistent explanation.
Josephc at 02:53:14 on 09/01:
Before you start calling people names:
1. An algorithm is simply a definition of rules by which some result will be determined. There is no mathematical proof available for any algorithm, as long as it follows the logical rules of mathematics then it is a valid algorithm. Rix (and OBNews) has decided that 0.5 * (√(2) ^ (rank - 1)) will be equal to the points for a family's standing on the Hall of Shame, and therefore it is so.
2. There is no mathematical proof that F=ma, as it is a formula hypothesized after scientific research and cannot be proved using any mathematical theorems.
3. F=ma only applies in a limited range of scenarios anyway, and so therefore could never be "proved" in the mathematical sense because it has proven to be false via observation under certain circumstances.
bafrali at 02:02:51 on 09/01:
lol Mr. Illiterate, have u heard that proof of any equation? Newton didnt make up F=m*a from his ass
Redspeert at 01:35:38 on 09/01:
Its called math, maybe you've heard about it?
bafrali at 01:12:11 on 09/01:
it is a joke? or prove that how u got that formula
Rix at 23:18:39 on 08/01:
We've adjusted the algorithm used to calculate the points at the hall of shame. It uses the following formula now:
0.5 * (√(2) ^ (rank - 1))
We will also add some code to give more points for top 3 or capo's than normal members.
We've adjusted the algorithm used to calculate the points at the hall of shame. It uses the following formula now:
0.5 * (√(2) ^ (rank - 1))
We will also add some code to give more points for top 3 or capo's than normal members.
it is a joke? or prove that how u got that formula
Its called math, maybe you've heard about it?
lol Mr. Illiterate, have u heard that proof of any equation? Newton didnt make up F=m*a from his ass
Before you start calling people names:
1. An algorithm is simply a definition of rules by which some result will be determined. There is no mathematical proof available for any algorithm, as long as it follows the logical rules of mathematics then it is a valid algorithm. Rix (and OBNews) has decided that 0.5 * (√(2) ^ (rank - 1)) will be equal to the points for a family's standing on the Hall of Shame, and therefore it is so.
2. There is no mathematical proof that F=ma, as it is a formula hypothesized after scientific research and cannot be proved using any mathematical theorems.
3. F=ma only applies in a limited range of scenarios anyway, and so therefore could never be "proved" in the mathematical sense because it has proven to be false via observation under certain circumstances.
u missed a point actually , simple or complex if you create a formula for something , u should explain its components and also its logic.
but in Rix' case , i agree with you , he can use any logic without a consistent explanation.
nice try but .. no :')
What at 03:48:03 on 09/01:
You are an idiot.. Retard beyond limits.. That Battal is a noob kid from GEN.TR.. Battalgazi is still in Maraz..
Dont hate Maraz hate me fagot!
Anonymous at 02:44:48 on 09/01:
People left Marazzino 1 by 1.. now Battalgazi who was their famous war commander left maraz, and now top3 in sacrifice ..
the hugger marazino will hug their account more after now..
now they are w8ing thier dead time..
Every sinlge seconds ticking for conflict power, and they will use their war experience and remember their big old dayss..
1 more Round and marazino will down ;)
People left Marazzino 1 by 1.. now Battalgazi who was their famous war commander left maraz, and now top3 in sacrifice ..
the hugger marazino will hug their account more after now..
now they are w8ing thier dead time..
Every sinlge seconds ticking for conflict power, and they will use their war experience and remember their big old dayss..
1 more Round and marazino will down ;)
You are an idiot.. Retard beyond limits.. That Battal is a noob kid from GEN.TR.. Battalgazi is still in Maraz..
Dont hate Maraz hate me fagot!
+1 im not goin anywhere :) im still a Maraz hugger :p
Josephc at 02:53:14 on 09/01:
Before you start calling people names:
1. An algorithm is simply a definition of rules by which some result will be determined. There is no mathematical proof available for any algorithm, as long as it follows the logical rules of mathematics then it is a valid algorithm. Rix (and OBNews) has decided that 0.5 * (√(2) ^ (rank - 1)) will be equal to the points for a family's standing on the Hall of Shame, and therefore it is so.
2. There is no mathematical proof that F=ma, as it is a formula hypothesized after scientific research and cannot be proved using any mathematical theorems.
3. F=ma only applies in a limited range of scenarios anyway, and so therefore could never be "proved" in the mathematical sense because it has proven to be false via observation under certain circumstances.
bafrali at 02:02:51 on 09/01:
lol Mr. Illiterate, have u heard that proof of any equation? Newton didnt make up F=m*a from his ass
Redspeert at 01:35:38 on 09/01:
Its called math, maybe you've heard about it?
bafrali at 01:12:11 on 09/01:
it is a joke? or prove that how u got that formula
Rix at 23:18:39 on 08/01:
We've adjusted the algorithm used to calculate the points at the hall of shame. It uses the following formula now:
0.5 * (√(2) ^ (rank - 1))
We will also add some code to give more points for top 3 or capo's than normal members.
We've adjusted the algorithm used to calculate the points at the hall of shame. It uses the following formula now:
0.5 * (√(2) ^ (rank - 1))
We will also add some code to give more points for top 3 or capo's than normal members.
it is a joke? or prove that how u got that formula
Its called math, maybe you've heard about it?
lol Mr. Illiterate, have u heard that proof of any equation? Newton didnt make up F=m*a from his ass
Before you start calling people names:
1. An algorithm is simply a definition of rules by which some result will be determined. There is no mathematical proof available for any algorithm, as long as it follows the logical rules of mathematics then it is a valid algorithm. Rix (and OBNews) has decided that 0.5 * (√(2) ^ (rank - 1)) will be equal to the points for a family's standing on the Hall of Shame, and therefore it is so.
2. There is no mathematical proof that F=ma, as it is a formula hypothesized after scientific research and cannot be proved using any mathematical theorems.
3. F=ma only applies in a limited range of scenarios anyway, and so therefore could never be "proved" in the mathematical sense because it has proven to be false via observation under certain circumstances.
u missed a point actually , simple or complex if you create a formula for something , u should explain its components and also its logic.
but in Rix' case , i agree with you , he can use any logic without a consistent explanation.
bafrali at 02:02:51 on 09/01:
lol Mr. Illiterate, have u heard that proof of any equation? Newton didnt make up F=m*a from his ass
Redspeert at 01:35:38 on 09/01:
Its called math, maybe you've heard about it?
bafrali at 01:12:11 on 09/01:
it is a joke? or prove that how u got that formula
Rix at 23:18:39 on 08/01:
We've adjusted the algorithm used to calculate the points at the hall of shame. It uses the following formula now:
0.5 * (√(2) ^ (rank - 1))
We will also add some code to give more points for top 3 or capo's than normal members.
We've adjusted the algorithm used to calculate the points at the hall of shame. It uses the following formula now:
0.5 * (√(2) ^ (rank - 1))
We will also add some code to give more points for top 3 or capo's than normal members.
it is a joke? or prove that how u got that formula
Its called math, maybe you've heard about it?
lol Mr. Illiterate, have u heard that proof of any equation? Newton didnt make up F=m*a from his ass
puahahahaha :D hakan amk :D
will there be some action tonite ??
Yes, in my pants. Wooooohoooo!
Yesss!!! party in legoland