» Menu
» OB/Site News
» Articles
 |
» Barafranca News
 |
|
article
General Comments & Major Rumors section.
Everyone knows where this section is for, keep it clean from flaming and only posts in english are allowed.
Everyone knows where this section is for, keep it clean from flaming and only posts in english are allowed.
Anonymous (20:41:42 - 06-01)
Conflict is bloods of vinci, so why should they shoot them? ;)
Anonymous (20:19:02 - 06-01)
Anonymous at 19:56:43 on 06/01:
Well not a surprise with 36 spots if a big one will start and of course a Conflict friend fam is ready to start.
Anonymous at 19:40:31 on 06/01:
a bird told me conflict and 2 more familyes from philla and balti have just hired o/
Anonymous at 18:26:24 on 06/01:
Hangover+Vincitori are gonna say bye bye tonight :w
Hangover+Vincitori are gonna say bye bye tonight :w
a bird told me conflict and 2 more familyes from philla and balti have just hired o/
Well not a surprise with 36 spots if a big one will start and of course a Conflict friend fam is ready to start.
there is more than 3 fams involved and more than 2 big fams in top ten ready to shoot for chicago bf enjoy the night
Anonymous (19:56:43 - 06-01)
Anonymous at 19:40:31 on 06/01:
a bird told me conflict and 2 more familyes from philla and balti have just hired o/
Anonymous at 18:26:24 on 06/01:
Hangover+Vincitori are gonna say bye bye tonight :w
Hangover+Vincitori are gonna say bye bye tonight :w
a bird told me conflict and 2 more familyes from philla and balti have just hired o/
Well not a surprise with 36 spots if a big one will start and of course a Conflict friend fam is ready to start.
Anonymous (19:40:31 - 06-01)
Anonymous at 18:26:24 on 06/01:
Hangover+Vincitori are gonna say bye bye tonight :w
Hangover+Vincitori are gonna say bye bye tonight :w
a bird told me conflict and 2 more familyes from philla and balti have just hired o/
Anonymous (18:43:01 - 06-01)
Turco at 14:36:55 on 06/01:
and maybe u shouldnt afraid that much xD Turkuz is not that powerfull so no need to explain anything in here.if u have enough courage then shut him up with your tommy not with your pen...
Audiowaste at 13:08:54 on 06/01:
In Holland people are free to have an opinion. And if Panna has a negative opinion about Turkuz, who are you to change that?
Next to that, he was defending your family, maybe you should read his comment more carefully.
In Holland people are free to have an opinion. And if Panna has a negative opinion about Turkuz, who are you to change that?
Next to that, he was defending your family, maybe you should read his comment more carefully.
and maybe u shouldnt afraid that much xD Turkuz is not that powerfull so no need to explain anything in here.if u have enough courage then shut him up with your tommy not with your pen...
It's Turkuz who are threatening Nazd and not the other way around, so shouldn't it be BoHem that is supposed to shoot first?
Come on Turkuz, let's see action and not just big words :D
Anonymous (18:26:24 - 06-01)
Hangover+Vincitori are gonna say bye bye tonight :w
Suicida| (18:16:37 - 06-01)
Vincej at 18:09:42 on 06/01:
Please don't troll or flame me!
Please don't troll or flame me!
Anonymous (18:12:54 - 06-01)
I'm just saying you're acting funny..
Sorry about that noob-part, never met to hurt you or anything...
but who are you seriously ROFL
Sorry about that noob-part, never met to hurt you or anything...
but who are you seriously ROFL
Anonymous (18:04:48 - 06-01)
@Vincej wahahaha who the fuck are you?
This kind of people make this game so f funny omfg, what a noob XDXDXD
This kind of people make this game so f funny omfg, what a noob XDXDXD
Vincej at 17:39:56 on 06/01:
ITT: Useless people trying to outsmart eachother, fucking kill yourselves please.
ITT: Useless people trying to outsmart eachother, fucking kill yourselves please.
And another useless person jumping trying to make a smart remark, please kill yourself.
klassikl (17:50:27 - 06-01)
Redspeert at 17:38:35 on 06/01:
Suppose you mean strongest? I don't know what stronghest mean.
klassikl at 17:27:20 on 06/01:
Yes, i know. That is why i said you mean survival of the stronghest.
Redspeert at 17:19:40 on 06/01:
No, I meant what I said. It's natural that the strongest succeed, and that the weaker die out, atleast according to charles darwin. Thus, survival of the fittest.
klassikl at 17:11:35 on 06/01:
I dont want to be annoying. But you mean survival of the stronghest :D
Redspeert at 22:36:26 on 04/01:
As I allready said, if you ain't big enough to hold a HQ, you won't get a HQ. Survival of the fittest.
As I allready said, if you ain't big enough to hold a HQ, you won't get a HQ. Survival of the fittest.
I dont want to be annoying. But you mean survival of the stronghest :D
No, I meant what I said. It's natural that the strongest succeed, and that the weaker die out, atleast according to charles darwin. Thus, survival of the fittest.
Yes, i know. That is why i said you mean survival of the stronghest.
Suppose you mean strongest? I don't know what stronghest mean.
Yep, sorry.
@vincej its not to outsmart anyone. And dont want to come agross like that. Just something i noticed, lots of people are mis using the phrase, and i thought lets point it out. Nothing else
ITT: Useless people trying to outsmart eachother, fucking kill yourselves please.
klassikl at 17:27:20 on 06/01:
Yes, i know. That is why i said you mean survival of the stronghest.
Redspeert at 17:19:40 on 06/01:
No, I meant what I said. It's natural that the strongest succeed, and that the weaker die out, atleast according to charles darwin. Thus, survival of the fittest.
klassikl at 17:11:35 on 06/01:
I dont want to be annoying. But you mean survival of the stronghest :D
Redspeert at 22:36:26 on 04/01:
As I allready said, if you ain't big enough to hold a HQ, you won't get a HQ. Survival of the fittest.
As I allready said, if you ain't big enough to hold a HQ, you won't get a HQ. Survival of the fittest.
I dont want to be annoying. But you mean survival of the stronghest :D
No, I meant what I said. It's natural that the strongest succeed, and that the weaker die out, atleast according to charles darwin. Thus, survival of the fittest.
Yes, i know. That is why i said you mean survival of the stronghest.
Suppose you mean strongest? I don't know what stronghest mean.
klassikl (17:27:20 - 06-01)
Redspeert at 17:19:40 on 06/01:
No, I meant what I said. It's natural that the strongest succeed, and that the weaker die out, atleast according to charles darwin. Thus, survival of the fittest.
klassikl at 17:11:35 on 06/01:
I dont want to be annoying. But you mean survival of the stronghest :D
Redspeert at 22:36:26 on 04/01:
As I allready said, if you ain't big enough to hold a HQ, you won't get a HQ. Survival of the fittest.
As I allready said, if you ain't big enough to hold a HQ, you won't get a HQ. Survival of the fittest.
I dont want to be annoying. But you mean survival of the stronghest :D
No, I meant what I said. It's natural that the strongest succeed, and that the weaker die out, atleast according to charles darwin. Thus, survival of the fittest.
Yes, i know. That is why i said you mean survival of the stronghest.
Redspeert at 17:19:40 on 06/01:
No, I meant what I said. It's natural that the strongest succeed, and that the weaker die out, atleast according to charles darwin. Thus, survival of the fittest.
klassikl at 17:11:35 on 06/01:
I dont want to be annoying. But you mean survival of the stronghest :D
Redspeert at 22:36:26 on 04/01:
As I allready said, if you ain't big enough to hold a HQ, you won't get a HQ. Survival of the fittest.
As I allready said, if you ain't big enough to hold a HQ, you won't get a HQ. Survival of the fittest.
I dont want to be annoying. But you mean survival of the stronghest :D
No, I meant what I said. It's natural that the strongest succeed, and that the weaker die out, atleast according to charles darwin. Thus, survival of the fittest.
You mean Survival of the Strongest, it's a common misunderstanding.
klassikl at 17:11:35 on 06/01:
I dont want to be annoying. But you mean survival of the stronghest :D
Redspeert at 22:36:26 on 04/01:
As I allready said, if you ain't big enough to hold a HQ, you won't get a HQ. Survival of the fittest.
As I allready said, if you ain't big enough to hold a HQ, you won't get a HQ. Survival of the fittest.
I dont want to be annoying. But you mean survival of the stronghest :D
No, I meant what I said. It's natural that the strongest succeed, and that the weaker die out, atleast according to charles darwin. Thus, survival of the fittest.
klassikl (17:11:35 - 06-01)
Redspeert at 22:36:26 on 04/01:
As I allready said, if you ain't big enough to hold a HQ, you won't get a HQ. Survival of the fittest.
As I allready said, if you ain't big enough to hold a HQ, you won't get a HQ. Survival of the fittest.
I dont want to be annoying. But you mean survival of the stronghest :D