» Menu

» Login

» OB/Site News

Omerta News Integration
Comments: 59 - Views: 55868 - Votes: 0
War rating
Comments: 10 - Views: 26588 - Votes: 4
Reporters Wanted!
Comments: 2 - Views: 18427 - Votes: 3
» Articles
Date Comments Rating

General Comments & Major Rumors
Comments: 58,013 - Views: 16,316,306 - Votes: 81
23-01 Winner of round #58 is...
Comments: 7 - Views: 157 - Votes: 1
Article is Locked!
Endless Struggle !
Comments: 514 - Views: 18,799 - Votes: 0
23-09 Reset → 30 September 2022, Friday → 12:00 OT
Comments: 72 - Views: 9,088 - Votes: 0
30-09 Welcome to Round #40!
Comments: 2 - Views: 2,299 - Votes: 0
19-09 Congratulations Reichsthaler!
Comments: 0 - Views: 2,125 - Votes: 0
01-09 Not Penny's boat..
Comments: 72 - Views: 19,264 - Votes: 0
21-08 First Family!
Comments: 6 - Views: 2,703 - Votes: 0
12-08 Welcome to Round #39
Comments: 5 - Views: 2,568 - Votes: 0
03-08 Reset → 12 August 2022, Friday → 10:00 OT
Comments: 17 - Views: 5,414 - Votes: 0
go back
go forward
» Barafranca News

» Online last 15 minutes

Guests: 520
Total members: 3754
Online: 2 (0.1%)
Members: Redspeert, pokemon
General Comments & Major Rumors
Author: sbanks
Last updated: 4722d 6h 47m 57s ago by MrWhite
Comments: 58,013
Views: 16,316,306
Votes: 81 (4.5 average)
article
General Comments & Major Rumors section.

Everyone knows where this section is for, keep it clean from flaming and only posts in english are allowed.
comments

Add a YouTube movie Add an image Add a link/url Help
Redspeert Syrian Arab Republic (18:35:11 - 28-05)
Link Quote
Let me tell you a story about last version and this one.

Last version the omerta crew admin Pakito was kicked out of the crew, because he was corrupt helping a certain family out alot.
He was giving them information about who hired dets, account stats etc. Helping them with revives and akills. He had been doing this for quite awhile, making it easier for this family to get the upper hand.

The problem now, is that Pakito is back in action as a crew admin, invited back by the ones (or one) who runs this game. She is claiming that the reason pakito was kicked out, was because he was hacked. He got caught being on people's accounts at a time he claimed to not be home, this he explained by that someone must have hacked him. One could also mention that the people he was helping protested about him getting kicked out...I would also have complained if my crew friend that helped me out alot got kicked. He also got these tops at skype.

She is also claiming that something that got leaked by the crew to this family, was something that alot of people knew about. The only problem is that alot of people didn't know it, only bramblerose and a couple of other persons. The two others had nothing to gain by leaking this, so either Bramblerose herself leaked it or she pasted it into the crew channel and pakito leaked it. Looking at how she is inviting corrupt crew members back into the crew she might aswell have been the original leaker.


I wonder, will the crew respond to this? Or will they just ignore it like they do with most things...people will still continue to buy DC's and fill their pockets.

-------------------------------

TL;DR version: Corrupt crew member got kicked last version, invited back now and will most likley continue to be corrupt helping a few persons and their family to get the upper hand.

Anonymous (16:45:29 - 28-05)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 16:19:26 on 28/05:
Fenrir at 10:10:09 on 28/05:
Anonymous at 10:07:55 on 28/05:
User: Insane / / / (Remove Friend)
Rank: Picciotto


at 10.01 OT. how could it be this fast ?

Voucher


but what kind of voucher that is. I saw 3 picci when vers started and 2 of them were Dutch. Anarchy was the one who get vouchers so why they`re supposed to be dutch while they`re turks ???

Because anarchy shared their voucher with their bloods?
Anonymous (16:32:22 - 28-05)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 16:19:26 on 28/05:
Fenrir at 10:10:09 on 28/05:
Anonymous at 10:07:55 on 28/05:
User: Insane / / / (Remove Friend)
Rank: Picciotto


at 10.01 OT. how could it be this fast ?

Voucher


but what kind of voucher that is. I saw 3 picci when vers started and 2 of them were Dutch. Anarchy was the one who get vouchers so why they`re supposed to be dutch while they`re turks ???
You think too much about it jon snow
Anonymous (16:19:26 - 28-05)
Link Quote
Fenrir at 10:10:09 on 28/05:
Anonymous at 10:07:55 on 28/05:
User: Insane / / / (Remove Friend)
Rank: Picciotto


at 10.01 OT. how could it be this fast ?

Voucher


but what kind of voucher that is. I saw 3 picci when vers started and 2 of them were Dutch. Anarchy was the one who get vouchers so why they`re supposed to be dutch while they`re turks ???
Fenrir Norway (10:10:09 - 28-05)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 10:07:55 on 28/05:
User: Insane / / / (Remove Friend)
Rank: Picciotto


at 10.01 OT. how could it be this fast ?

Voucher
Anonymous (10:07:55 - 28-05)
Link Quote
User: Insane / / / (Remove Friend)
Rank: Picciotto


at 10.01 OT. how could it be this fast ?
Anonymous (19:55:33 - 27-05)
Link Quote
Sorry for the bad posting edition.

OBN considered me a bot, and I kinda messed up copy and paste.
Anonymous (19:54:48 - 27-05)
Link Quote
Killerzzz at 17:17:26 on 27/05:
Anonymous at 05:02:39 on 24/05:
I have a totally different suggestion.
Make Group Crimes a mandatory part of ranking.

What I mean is

You can't promote from shoppie to asso if you have not 100% RP AND done at least 5 heists (just to name a number). For asso to mobster make it 10 heists.
For Mobster to soldier 20 Heists + 5 OC etc.

That has two effects.

First Group Crimes would actually matter (again) and pure lackey accounts can't compete with manual accounts.
Seconldy it would decrease the ranking speed. At least in the higher tire ranks. Because as we all know there is a cool down on OCs and MOCs.
If you have to do at least 3 MOCs (again just naming a number) in order to get LC you will be stuck at LC for quite a bit. -> a longer version.

OFC for that to be effective the actual rank has to gain in importance/weigh in comparission to mere rankpoints. What I mean is, if a LC with #5 in rankpoints can easily kill a brug who is likesay #20 in rankpoints, than this whole excercise is in vain. Simple solution, make group crimes more relevant for rank progress.

I know that admins been working on this, when i came back and played some DM i takled to dot an she showed me some screenshots of what they were working on it had to do brining back manual advantages, for example a brug needed x amount of groupcrimes / honorpoints / busts etc to get to bruglione i liked that idea alot when they showed me, though knowing this is omerta it will take probably 5 years to implement it

Killerzzz at 17:17:26 on 27/05:
Anonymous at 05:02:39 on 24/05:
I have a totally different suggestion.
Make Group Crimes a mandatory part of ranking.

What I mean is

You can't promote from shoppie to asso if you have not 100% RP AND done at least 5 heists (just to name a number). For asso to mobster make it 10 heists.
For Mobster to soldier 20 Heists + 5 OC etc.

That has two effects.

First Group Crimes would actually matter (again) and pure lackey accounts can't compete with manual accounts.
Seconldy it would decrease the ranking speed. At least in the higher tire ranks. Because as we all know there is a cool down on OCs and MOCs.
If you have to do at least 3 MOCs (again just naming a number) in order to get LC you will be stuck at LC for quite a bit. -> a longer version.

OFC for that to be effective the actual rank has to gain in importance/weigh in comparission to mere rankpoints. What I mean is, if a LC with #5 in rankpoints can easily kill a brug who is likesay #20 in rankpoints, than this whole excercise is in vain. Simple solution, make group crimes more relevant for rank progress.

I know that admins been working on this, when i came back and played some DM i takled to dot an she showed me some screenshots of what they were working on it had to do brining back manual advantages, for example a brug needed x amount of groupcrimes / honorpoints / busts etc to get to bruglione i liked that idea alot when they showed me, though knowing this is omerta it will take probably 5 years to implement it

Well, I have a big Problem with involving HPs in that concept. Thus I only used Group Crimes.
The Problem with Honor Points are dupes (surprise). We all know, that dupes are a major source for HPs in this game. So making them part of the Promotion Equation is dumb, it even worse than dumb, it's dumb even by Brando standards. On the Brando scale (equivalent to Hockey's Milbury scale in assessing Trades(google it)). That's a full four Brandos.
Adding Busts is just two Brandos. It encourages the further spread of Bust Scripts. Would it make much of a difference to the status quo? No, idea.
Killerzzz Netherlands (17:17:26 - 27-05)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 05:02:39 on 24/05:
I have a totally different suggestion.
Make Group Crimes a mandatory part of ranking.

What I mean is

You can't promote from shoppie to asso if you have not 100% RP AND done at least 5 heists (just to name a number). For asso to mobster make it 10 heists.
For Mobster to soldier 20 Heists + 5 OC etc.

That has two effects.

First Group Crimes would actually matter (again) and pure lackey accounts can't compete with manual accounts.
Seconldy it would decrease the ranking speed. At least in the higher tire ranks. Because as we all know there is a cool down on OCs and MOCs.
If you have to do at least 3 MOCs (again just naming a number) in order to get LC you will be stuck at LC for quite a bit. -> a longer version.

OFC for that to be effective the actual rank has to gain in importance/weigh in comparission to mere rankpoints. What I mean is, if a LC with #5 in rankpoints can easily kill a brug who is likesay #20 in rankpoints, than this whole excercise is in vain. Simple solution, make group crimes more relevant for rank progress.

I know that admins been working on this, when i came back and played some DM i takled to dot an she showed me some screenshots of what they were working on it had to do brining back manual advantages, for example a brug needed x amount of groupcrimes / honorpoints / busts etc to get to bruglione i liked that idea alot when they showed me, though knowing this is omerta it will take probably 5 years to implement it
Anonymous (10:29:15 - 27-05)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 21:48:00 on 26/05:
Anonymous at 16:32:20 on 25/05:
Anonymous at 21:35:35 on 24/05:
Anonymous at 21:20:29 on 24/05:
Anonymous at 13:33:34 on 24/05:
Anonymous at 05:02:39 on 24/05:
I have a totally different suggestion.
Make Group Crimes a mandatory part of ranking.

What I mean is

You can't promote from shoppie to asso if you have not 100% RP AND done at least 5 heists (just to name a number). For asso to mobster make it 10 heists.
For Mobster to soldier 20 Heists + 5 OC etc.

That has two effects.

First Group Crimes would actually matter (again) and pure lackey accounts can't compete with manual accounts.
Seconldy it would decrease the ranking speed. At least in the higher tire ranks. Because as we all know there is a cool down on OCs and MOCs.
If you have to do at least 3 MOCs (again just naming a number) in order to get LC you will be stuck at LC for quite a bit. -> a longer version.

OFC for that to be effective the actual rank has to gain in importance/weigh in comparission to mere rankpoints. What I mean is, if a LC with #5 in rankpoints can easily kill a brug who is likesay #20 in rankpoints, than this whole excercise is in vain. Simple solution, make group crimes more relevant for rank progress.

this will only mean that people will use teamviewer more and more to do groupcrimes if they get that important. Teamviewer is already used way too much (not by me, but i know it is used by many people).


And that would be worse than the status quo, where people basically hire lackeys for their accounts and do shit otherwise?
I for one use lackeys as much as I can but I also do all the group crimes I can as well. I would be supprised if it turned out that almost no one using lackeys for ranking never do group crimes...

Do you think Maraz guy or Grannqe bother to do GC with every single member their clone armies?
Maraz guy ? lol
You better check the Hall of Shame to see who had clone armies
Idk if you guys have played .dm lately but they kinda fucking it up....
sure let me suck my own dick (07:28:33 - 27-05)
Link Quote
where can i see who won all the shits?XD hof
Anonymous (06:40:04 - 27-05)
Link Quote
Field fairies united? Lol 😓😓😍😘
Anonymous (21:48:00 - 26-05)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 16:32:20 on 25/05:
Anonymous at 21:35:35 on 24/05:
Anonymous at 21:20:29 on 24/05:
Anonymous at 13:33:34 on 24/05:
Anonymous at 05:02:39 on 24/05:
I have a totally different suggestion.
Make Group Crimes a mandatory part of ranking.

What I mean is

You can't promote from shoppie to asso if you have not 100% RP AND done at least 5 heists (just to name a number). For asso to mobster make it 10 heists.
For Mobster to soldier 20 Heists + 5 OC etc.

That has two effects.

First Group Crimes would actually matter (again) and pure lackey accounts can't compete with manual accounts.
Seconldy it would decrease the ranking speed. At least in the higher tire ranks. Because as we all know there is a cool down on OCs and MOCs.
If you have to do at least 3 MOCs (again just naming a number) in order to get LC you will be stuck at LC for quite a bit. -> a longer version.

OFC for that to be effective the actual rank has to gain in importance/weigh in comparission to mere rankpoints. What I mean is, if a LC with #5 in rankpoints can easily kill a brug who is likesay #20 in rankpoints, than this whole excercise is in vain. Simple solution, make group crimes more relevant for rank progress.

this will only mean that people will use teamviewer more and more to do groupcrimes if they get that important. Teamviewer is already used way too much (not by me, but i know it is used by many people).


And that would be worse than the status quo, where people basically hire lackeys for their accounts and do shit otherwise?
I for one use lackeys as much as I can but I also do all the group crimes I can as well. I would be supprised if it turned out that almost no one using lackeys for ranking never do group crimes...

Do you think Maraz guy or Grannqe bother to do GC with every single member their clone armies?
Maraz guy ? lol
You better check the Hall of Shame to see who had clone armies
Anonymous (20:44:27 - 26-05)
Link Quote
sure let me suck my own dick at 20:41:39 on 26/05:
grannnqe at 12:47:18 on 26/05:
Anonymous at 16:32:20 on 25/05:
Anonymous at 21:35:35 on 24/05:
Anonymous at 21:20:29 on 24/05:
Anonymous at 13:33:34 on 24/05:
Anonymous at 05:02:39 on 24/05:
I have a totally different suggestion.
Make Group Crimes a mandatory part of ranking.

What I mean is

You can't promote from shoppie to asso if you have not 100% RP AND done at least 5 heists (just to name a number). For asso to mobster make it 10 heists.
For Mobster to soldier 20 Heists + 5 OC etc.

That has two effects.

First Group Crimes would actually matter (again) and pure lackey accounts can't compete with manual accounts.
Seconldy it would decrease the ranking speed. At least in the higher tire ranks. Because as we all know there is a cool down on OCs and MOCs.
If you have to do at least 3 MOCs (again just naming a number) in order to get LC you will be stuck at LC for quite a bit. -> a longer version.

OFC for that to be effective the actual rank has to gain in importance/weigh in comparission to mere rankpoints. What I mean is, if a LC with #5 in rankpoints can easily kill a brug who is likesay #20 in rankpoints, than this whole excercise is in vain. Simple solution, make group crimes more relevant for rank progress.

this will only mean that people will use teamviewer more and more to do groupcrimes if they get that important. Teamviewer is already used way too much (not by me, but i know it is used by many people).


And that would be worse than the status quo, where people basically hire lackeys for their accounts and do shit otherwise?
I for one use lackeys as much as I can but I also do all the group crimes I can as well. I would be supprised if it turned out that almost no one using lackeys for ranking never do group crimes...

Do you think Maraz guy or Grannqe bother to do GC with every single member their clone armies?

Who the fuck on the world would bother to do gc's with more than 7clones when u would get 100kk+ weekly with just buying them a plane lol

what is GC ????????????

groupcrimes
sure let me suck my own dick (20:41:39 - 26-05)
Link Quote
grannnqe at 12:47:18 on 26/05:
Anonymous at 16:32:20 on 25/05:
Anonymous at 21:35:35 on 24/05:
Anonymous at 21:20:29 on 24/05:
Anonymous at 13:33:34 on 24/05:
Anonymous at 05:02:39 on 24/05:
I have a totally different suggestion.
Make Group Crimes a mandatory part of ranking.

What I mean is

You can't promote from shoppie to asso if you have not 100% RP AND done at least 5 heists (just to name a number). For asso to mobster make it 10 heists.
For Mobster to soldier 20 Heists + 5 OC etc.

That has two effects.

First Group Crimes would actually matter (again) and pure lackey accounts can't compete with manual accounts.
Seconldy it would decrease the ranking speed. At least in the higher tire ranks. Because as we all know there is a cool down on OCs and MOCs.
If you have to do at least 3 MOCs (again just naming a number) in order to get LC you will be stuck at LC for quite a bit. -> a longer version.

OFC for that to be effective the actual rank has to gain in importance/weigh in comparission to mere rankpoints. What I mean is, if a LC with #5 in rankpoints can easily kill a brug who is likesay #20 in rankpoints, than this whole excercise is in vain. Simple solution, make group crimes more relevant for rank progress.

this will only mean that people will use teamviewer more and more to do groupcrimes if they get that important. Teamviewer is already used way too much (not by me, but i know it is used by many people).


And that would be worse than the status quo, where people basically hire lackeys for their accounts and do shit otherwise?
I for one use lackeys as much as I can but I also do all the group crimes I can as well. I would be supprised if it turned out that almost no one using lackeys for ranking never do group crimes...

Do you think Maraz guy or Grannqe bother to do GC with every single member their clone armies?

Who the fuck on the world would bother to do gc's with more than 7clones when u would get 100kk+ weekly with just buying them a plane lol

what is GC ????????????
grannnqe (12:47:18 - 26-05)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 16:32:20 on 25/05:
Anonymous at 21:35:35 on 24/05:
Anonymous at 21:20:29 on 24/05:
Anonymous at 13:33:34 on 24/05:
Anonymous at 05:02:39 on 24/05:
I have a totally different suggestion.
Make Group Crimes a mandatory part of ranking.

What I mean is

You can't promote from shoppie to asso if you have not 100% RP AND done at least 5 heists (just to name a number). For asso to mobster make it 10 heists.
For Mobster to soldier 20 Heists + 5 OC etc.

That has two effects.

First Group Crimes would actually matter (again) and pure lackey accounts can't compete with manual accounts.
Seconldy it would decrease the ranking speed. At least in the higher tire ranks. Because as we all know there is a cool down on OCs and MOCs.
If you have to do at least 3 MOCs (again just naming a number) in order to get LC you will be stuck at LC for quite a bit. -> a longer version.

OFC for that to be effective the actual rank has to gain in importance/weigh in comparission to mere rankpoints. What I mean is, if a LC with #5 in rankpoints can easily kill a brug who is likesay #20 in rankpoints, than this whole excercise is in vain. Simple solution, make group crimes more relevant for rank progress.

this will only mean that people will use teamviewer more and more to do groupcrimes if they get that important. Teamviewer is already used way too much (not by me, but i know it is used by many people).


And that would be worse than the status quo, where people basically hire lackeys for their accounts and do shit otherwise?
I for one use lackeys as much as I can but I also do all the group crimes I can as well. I would be supprised if it turned out that almost no one using lackeys for ranking never do group crimes...

Do you think Maraz guy or Grannqe bother to do GC with every single member their clone armies?

Who the fuck on the world would bother to do gc's with more than 7clones when u would get 100kk+ weekly with just buying them a plane lol
Anonymous (16:32:20 - 25-05)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 21:35:35 on 24/05:
Anonymous at 21:20:29 on 24/05:
Anonymous at 13:33:34 on 24/05:
Anonymous at 05:02:39 on 24/05:
I have a totally different suggestion.
Make Group Crimes a mandatory part of ranking.

What I mean is

You can't promote from shoppie to asso if you have not 100% RP AND done at least 5 heists (just to name a number). For asso to mobster make it 10 heists.
For Mobster to soldier 20 Heists + 5 OC etc.

That has two effects.

First Group Crimes would actually matter (again) and pure lackey accounts can't compete with manual accounts.
Seconldy it would decrease the ranking speed. At least in the higher tire ranks. Because as we all know there is a cool down on OCs and MOCs.
If you have to do at least 3 MOCs (again just naming a number) in order to get LC you will be stuck at LC for quite a bit. -> a longer version.

OFC for that to be effective the actual rank has to gain in importance/weigh in comparission to mere rankpoints. What I mean is, if a LC with #5 in rankpoints can easily kill a brug who is likesay #20 in rankpoints, than this whole excercise is in vain. Simple solution, make group crimes more relevant for rank progress.

this will only mean that people will use teamviewer more and more to do groupcrimes if they get that important. Teamviewer is already used way too much (not by me, but i know it is used by many people).


And that would be worse than the status quo, where people basically hire lackeys for their accounts and do shit otherwise?
I for one use lackeys as much as I can but I also do all the group crimes I can as well. I would be supprised if it turned out that almost no one using lackeys for ranking never do group crimes...

Do you think Maraz guy or Grannqe bother to do GC with every single member their clone armies?
Anonymous (15:50:33 - 25-05)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 13:28:12 on 25/05:
Anonymous at 12:35:46 on 25/05:
I think it's somewhat funny how people try to find a reason why the game is running worse every version and end up blaming game mechanics.

If you want a 'never ending version' or longer versions overall, then it might be a good solution to stop cluttering your side until it has over 50% of all highranks. I think anarchy has not been in a single war in which they even had a remote chance of losing that war or even getting shot back at because of massive ratios. Now I just pointed out anarchy but the majority of families no longer dares to start a war if they don't have a 5:1 ratio + backup for counters.

If you want to change this game so much, take no official bloods and aim to win this version by yourself (meaning 1 fam standing).

It's players that mess up this game, game mechanics are a small part of it.

Its rly sad to see the left over fams just sit and watch around , this stage
I just hope , admins will say tomorow 'we removed the HOF' , then i will really laugh whit those huggers

I also cant believe the inkills at this stage ... game is over ffs , just have fun !

Blame the HOF for the short versions ...

Not just the HOF, people would lock up the version with big groups before the introduction of the HoF already. These days it has just become more of a race of who can get most people to crawl up their ass instead of playing this game the way it was designed to be played like.

I wonder why people create such big groups of players, the win of Anarchy this version and several other families in the previous versions are not much of an achievement at all. It would've been more of an achievement in a negative way if they weren't able to do so. It's like putting Barcelona in the 2nd league, win it and being proud of it. Totally has no value.

It's time for the admins to make a 1 fam to end rule I guess because the players don't have the nutts in their underwear to do so themselves. If families still decide to lockup the game, do random akill streaks of 30 each time, so it might even happen a smaller, more useless family, ends up on top. ;)
Anonymous (13:28:12 - 25-05)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 12:35:46 on 25/05:
I think it's somewhat funny how people try to find a reason why the game is running worse every version and end up blaming game mechanics.

If you want a 'never ending version' or longer versions overall, then it might be a good solution to stop cluttering your side until it has over 50% of all highranks. I think anarchy has not been in a single war in which they even had a remote chance of losing that war or even getting shot back at because of massive ratios. Now I just pointed out anarchy but the majority of families no longer dares to start a war if they don't have a 5:1 ratio + backup for counters.

If you want to change this game so much, take no official bloods and aim to win this version by yourself (meaning 1 fam standing).

It's players that mess up this game, game mechanics are a small part of it.

Its rly sad to see the left over fams just sit and watch around , this stage
I just hope , admins will say tomorow 'we removed the HOF' , then i will really laugh whit those huggers

I also cant believe the inkills at this stage ... game is over ffs , just have fun !

Blame the HOF for the short versions ...
Anonymous (12:35:46 - 25-05)
Link Quote
I think it's somewhat funny how people try to find a reason why the game is running worse every version and end up blaming game mechanics.

If you want a 'never ending version' or longer versions overall, then it might be a good solution to stop cluttering your side until it has over 50% of all highranks. I think anarchy has not been in a single war in which they even had a remote chance of losing that war or even getting shot back at because of massive ratios. Now I just pointed out anarchy but the majority of families no longer dares to start a war if they don't have a 5:1 ratio + backup for counters.

If you want to change this game so much, take no official bloods and aim to win this version by yourself (meaning 1 fam standing).

It's players that mess up this game, game mechanics are a small part of it.