Sadnesss at 16:11:14 on 23/08:
sadnesss dupes accounts
19:07 sadnesss i reported you
19:07 Thijsrockt same ip yes
19:07 Thijsrockt dupes no
19:07 Thijsrockt we violated zero rules
19:07 sadnesss same ip
19:07 sadnesss is dupe
19:07 Thijsrockt so my little brother isn't allowed to play:'')
19:07 Thijsrockt cmon rules are there for ages
19:08 sadnesss i will tell them to see capitalis forum?
19:08 Thijsrockt we didn't break one of them
19:08 sadnesss dupes...
19:08 sadnesss stop fooling ppl
19:08 Thijsrockt there's a clean explaination for that
19:08 sadnesss is not
19:08 Thijsrockt but it doesn't matter
19:09 sadnesss you put your name
19:09 sadnesss on capitalis forum
19:09 Thijsrockt if bara wants to kill fair players who put a lot of effort to educate new players
19:09 sadnesss and after on your family profile...
19:09 Thijsrockt they're taking down themselves


this is faffie honor ...little brother how low you can be to say that

Anonymous at 15:42:34 on 23/08:
an1 knows any other similar online mafia game ???

Sadnesss at 15:33:18 on 23/08:
When dupes problem will be solved?

anon at 17:20:42 on 23/08:

(A) Flecha Picciotto 15/07 20:42:56 38D 20H 36M

This is the only A-kill of Faffie. Retard

Anonymous at 16:50:28 on 23/08:
faffie dupe fams. nice. how can these cheating nubs win a version?

Sadnesss at 15:33:18 on 23/08:
When dupes problem will be solved?

Anonymous at 16:17:39 on 23/08:

yeah Avaritia and Capitalis are clearly Faffie....
You won't find Faffie dupes i bet.
you might have more luck with other fams.

Sadnesss at 16:11:14 on 23/08:
sadnesss dupes accounts
19:07 sadnesss i reported you
19:07 Thijsrockt same ip yes
19:07 Thijsrockt dupes no
19:07 Thijsrockt we violated zero rules
19:07 sadnesss same ip
19:07 sadnesss is dupe
19:07 Thijsrockt so my little brother isn't allowed to play:'')
19:07 Thijsrockt cmon rules are there for ages
19:08 sadnesss i will tell them to see capitalis forum?
19:08 Thijsrockt we didn't break one of them
19:08 sadnesss dupes...
19:08 sadnesss stop fooling ppl
19:08 Thijsrockt there's a clean explaination for that
19:08 sadnesss is not
19:08 Thijsrockt but it doesn't matter
19:09 sadnesss you put your name
19:09 sadnesss on capitalis forum
19:09 Thijsrockt if bara wants to kill fair players who put a lot of effort to educate new players
19:09 sadnesss and after on your family profile...
19:09 Thijsrockt they're taking down themselves


this is faffie honor ...little brother how low you can be to say that

Anonymous at 15:34:40 on 23/08:
If you leave, we got rid of the first one ;-).

Sadnesss at 15:33:18 on 23/08:
When dupes problem will be solved?

Giddiness at 12:43:33 on 23/08:
All I see here is that there should be omerta slang in your dictionary xD

Ber at 12:38:03 on 23/08:
and for all the whiners

here u got the defenition of a Gangbang

gang·bang or gang-bang (gngbng)
n. Vulgar Slang
1. Sexual intercourse, often rape, involving one person or victim and several others who have relations with that person in rapid succession.
2. Sexual intercourse involving several people who select and change partners.
v. gang·banged or gang-banged, gang·bang·ing or gang-bang·ing, gang·bangs or gang-bangs
v.intr.
1. Vulgar Slang To participate as an aggressor in a gangbang.
2. Slang To participate in violent gang-related activities.
v.tr. Vulgar Slang
To subject to a gangbang.


didnt know sex were an option in omerta :")

Ber at 12:38:03 on 23/08:
and for all the whiners

here u got the defenition of a Gangbang

gang·bang or gang-bang (gngbng)
n. Vulgar Slang
1. Sexual intercourse, often rape, involving one person or victim and several others who have relations with that person in rapid succession.
2. Sexual intercourse involving several people who select and change partners.
v. gang·banged or gang-banged, gang·bang·ing or gang-bang·ing, gang·bangs or gang-bangs
v.intr.
1. Vulgar Slang To participate as an aggressor in a gangbang.
2. Slang To participate in violent gang-related activities.
v.tr. Vulgar Slang
To subject to a gangbang.


didnt know sex were an option in omerta :")

Anonymous at 01:46:56 on 23/08:

I fundamentally disagree with you. Bloods itself are not the problem. The problem is the sheer amount of families that form a bloodweb these days.
Nobody has a problem with five or six blooded families finishing a version together.
The problem is, it has become en vogue the last couple of versions to finish a version with 10 fams. And as a result 10 fams go after 2 or 3 each war.

And it's not particularly helpful, when families are in a self-denial mode and do mental gymnastics to reduce the amounts of families they call bloods by counting a 4 fam alliance as a single blood. Thus they can add five more families and still just have officially six bloods (while infact they are blooded with nine).
Same with this Janissary+ faggotry. If you start as a four fam alliance, and add five families, you are massblooding, too.

And of course, the families you blood bring each two more families into those "bloodwebs" you are not blooded yourself to, but that will usually no attack you and probably jump for you with your blood if needed.

Versions would be better and go longer, if all tops were a) a bit more honest to themselves about how many bloods they have. and b) if all tops reach some kinda consensus, to limit their bloods and stick to that. And just jump when their actual bloods are under attack and not their "Bloods' bloods". (It's not gonna happen.)

As it is now, almost any given war either escalates into a server wide rampage or a gangbang, because attacking fams shit their pants, beacuse some families that have no business in that war will jump, because their bloods are in for the counter.