» Menu
» OB/Site News
» Articles
» Barafranca News
No news found. Reset in progress?
|
article
General Comments & Major Rumors section.
Everyone knows where this section is for, keep it clean from flaming and only posts in english are allowed.
Everyone knows where this section is for, keep it clean from flaming and only posts in english are allowed.
Robbiee (16:24:41 - 15-07)
Arcanine (16:23:00 - 15-07)
Amos Infinity at 16:20:50 on 15/07:
prolly ur bg setup is wrong,u used 2 att bg to kill a brug whereelse the other acct have 3 set bg,i kill a chief while im lc and survive while the other party bullets is higher than me, i think bg setup is important in this game just my 10 cent
prolly ur bg setup is wrong,u used 2 att bg to kill a brug whereelse the other acct have 3 set bg,i kill a chief while im lc and survive while the other party bullets is higher than me, i think bg setup is important in this game just my 10 cent
Sorry, doesnt work that way. I also found another interesting result in my next 20k attempt but gonna test it 1 more time before I post it here:P
It's a very,very strange result
Amos Infinity (16:20:50 - 15-07)
Arcanine at 15:13:33 on 15/07:
You were driving around town as you saw ****speeding around town in a shiny new motor - you decided to give chase!
You tossed 3 molotovs at the car, exploding the engine!
You duck behind the wall of a nearby garage as ***** pulls a Smith & Wesson .357 Magnum out and whirls around and pulls the trigger...
***** suffered but is still alive.
Your enemy tried to strike back, his bullets found their way through your body, but you survived.
2 of your guards were slaughtered in the counterattack!
-----------------------------
I shot 20k to test the backfire. My target had same bacfkire so I got 20k bullets back. Results.. defender has 65 health left. Ok nothing weird.
I had 39 HEALTH left after receiving 20k backfire. So even 40k would have killed me. Easily.
Both are Brugs and exactly same RP. However I have 200k(!!!!!) more bullets in stock and was capo.
So even with 200k more bullets in stock I get killed with 40k backfire.
We both had 3 defensive bodyguards and Vic+Ike trained on attack.
Backfire is fucked. Bigtime.
You were driving around town as you saw ****speeding around town in a shiny new motor - you decided to give chase!
You tossed 3 molotovs at the car, exploding the engine!
You duck behind the wall of a nearby garage as ***** pulls a Smith & Wesson .357 Magnum out and whirls around and pulls the trigger...
***** suffered but is still alive.
Your enemy tried to strike back, his bullets found their way through your body, but you survived.
2 of your guards were slaughtered in the counterattack!
-----------------------------
I shot 20k to test the backfire. My target had same bacfkire so I got 20k bullets back. Results.. defender has 65 health left. Ok nothing weird.
I had 39 HEALTH left after receiving 20k backfire. So even 40k would have killed me. Easily.
Both are Brugs and exactly same RP. However I have 200k(!!!!!) more bullets in stock and was capo.
So even with 200k more bullets in stock I get killed with 40k backfire.
We both had 3 defensive bodyguards and Vic+Ike trained on attack.
Backfire is fucked. Bigtime.
Robbiee (16:03:03 - 15-07)
Arcanine at 15:58:55 on 15/07:
It's never fair that 1 of the players has a HUGE advantage simply because he is either defending or attacking. They should just compare both accounts and then decide who is worthy of 'winning' the battle. Who presses on the Kill button first shouldnt matter too much.
Robbiee at 15:56:42 on 15/07:
Ok , put bgs full deff and you will survive , im against backfire , if someone attack you and you are full deff you survive , and go safehouse or buy blood what ever you live...And btw im talking of shooting the same rank (Chief - Chief , Brug - Brug) not above...
Anonymous at 15:53:19 on 15/07:
Both attacking is not possible...someone has to defend and therefor he should have the same chance like the attacker.
Both attacking is not possible...someone has to defend and therefor he should have the same chance like the attacker.
Ok , put bgs full deff and you will survive , im against backfire , if someone attack you and you are full deff you survive , and go safehouse or buy blood what ever you live...And btw im talking of shooting the same rank (Chief - Chief , Brug - Brug) not above...
It's never fair that 1 of the players has a HUGE advantage simply because he is either defending or attacking. They should just compare both accounts and then decide who is worthy of 'winning' the battle. Who presses on the Kill button first shouldnt matter too much.
I agree in one way , but if you have lover worth account , you simple can't kill him easy...But bf? Im simple not fon of it :D its not real by me :P
Anonymous (16:01:23 - 15-07)
Robbiee at 15:56:42 on 15/07:
Ok , put bgs full deff and you will survive , im against backfire , if someone attack you and you are full deff you survive , and go safehouse or buy blood what ever you live...And btw im talking of shooting the same rank (Chief - Chief , Brug - Brug) not above...
Anonymous at 15:53:19 on 15/07:
Both attacking is not possible...someone has to defend and therefor he should have the same chance like the attacker.
Both attacking is not possible...someone has to defend and therefor he should have the same chance like the attacker.
Ok , put bgs full deff and you will survive , im against backfire , if someone attack you and you are full deff you survive , and go safehouse or buy blood what ever you live...And btw im talking of shooting the same rank (Chief - Chief , Brug - Brug) not above...
Dont agree with you , in RL you kill from first try some Don or enemy ? Or sometimes from 2,3 tries , so i agree that should improve a bit accounts who are strong with bullets and with rank progres , its sensless to die from account who have 40k and you have 400k ...but i am also for ,that deffender side should have chance to survive and stricke back ...and with full deff setup there is no chance for counter attack , so its stupid to put full deff ...
Arcanine (15:58:55 - 15-07)
Robbiee at 15:56:42 on 15/07:
Ok , put bgs full deff and you will survive , im against backfire , if someone attack you and you are full deff you survive , and go safehouse or buy blood what ever you live...And btw im talking of shooting the same rank (Chief - Chief , Brug - Brug) not above...
Anonymous at 15:53:19 on 15/07:
Both attacking is not possible...someone has to defend and therefor he should have the same chance like the attacker.
Both attacking is not possible...someone has to defend and therefor he should have the same chance like the attacker.
Ok , put bgs full deff and you will survive , im against backfire , if someone attack you and you are full deff you survive , and go safehouse or buy blood what ever you live...And btw im talking of shooting the same rank (Chief - Chief , Brug - Brug) not above...
It's never fair that 1 of the players has a HUGE advantage simply because he is either defending or attacking. They should just compare both accounts and then decide who is worthy of 'winning' the battle. Who presses on the Kill button first shouldnt matter too much.
Robbiee (15:56:42 - 15-07)
Anonymous at 15:53:19 on 15/07:
Both attacking is not possible...someone has to defend and therefor he should have the same chance like the attacker.
Both attacking is not possible...someone has to defend and therefor he should have the same chance like the attacker.
Ok , put bgs full deff and you will survive , im against backfire , if someone attack you and you are full deff you survive , and go safehouse or buy blood what ever you live...And btw im talking of shooting the same rank (Chief - Chief , Brug - Brug) not above...
Anonymous (15:53:19 - 15-07)
Both attacking is not possible...someone has to defend and therefor he should have the same chance like the attacker.
Robbiee (15:51:54 - 15-07)
Anonymous at 15:49:36 on 15/07:
That statement goes both ways...defenders have ranked for 1 month and than be killed in 1 click.
Robbiee at 15:45:19 on 15/07:
about 1 mounth of ranking , spent money on dcs etc , and for what?For dying in one single click and all again from Soldier or Aso...So , advantage to attackers , and lets strategy wins (balls for attack = win) ty o/
about 1 mounth of ranking , spent money on dcs etc , and for what?For dying in one single click and all again from Soldier or Aso...So , advantage to attackers , and lets strategy wins (balls for attack = win) ty o/
That statement goes both ways...defenders have ranked for 1 month and than be killed in 1 click.
He should attack first than ?
Arcanine (15:50:48 - 15-07)
Anonymous at 15:49:36 on 15/07:
That statement goes both ways...defenders have ranked for 1 month and than be killed in 1 click.
Robbiee at 15:45:19 on 15/07:
about 1 mounth of ranking , spent money on dcs etc , and for what?For dying in one single click and all again from Soldier or Aso...So , advantage to attackers , and lets strategy wins (balls for attack = win) ty o/
about 1 mounth of ranking , spent money on dcs etc , and for what?For dying in one single click and all again from Soldier or Aso...So , advantage to attackers , and lets strategy wins (balls for attack = win) ty o/
That statement goes both ways...defenders have ranked for 1 month and than be killed in 1 click.
True. They should massively increase the odds of an attempt having 2 survivors. As it is there is 90%+ chance of you dying when you press the Kill button.
Anonymous (15:49:36 - 15-07)
Robbiee at 15:45:19 on 15/07:
about 1 mounth of ranking , spent money on dcs etc , and for what?For dying in one single click and all again from Soldier or Aso...So , advantage to attackers , and lets strategy wins (balls for attack = win) ty o/
about 1 mounth of ranking , spent money on dcs etc , and for what?For dying in one single click and all again from Soldier or Aso...So , advantage to attackers , and lets strategy wins (balls for attack = win) ty o/
That statement goes both ways...defenders have ranked for 1 month and than be killed in 1 click.
Robbiee (15:45:19 - 15-07)
Arcanine at 15:30:48 on 15/07:
Maybe but when I have a MUCH stronger account like in my kill attempt I expect to survive and certainly not die of 40k backfire. WIth 20k I didnt do any damage, not even kill a bodyguard but would have gotten lethal backfire back if my target had double backfire.
Like I said when I have 200k more bullets in stock I expect to survive backfire of the much weaker target.
I also found the reason why we saw backfire kills after 3 bodyguards were killed and target didnt come online..however I'll just report it to the devs. I'd really recommend no wars.
Anonymous at 15:27:25 on 15/07:
shooting should be a gamble where you don't know if you survive or not, atleast if you shoot face to face, without carkill and preshoot.
Last versions people complained that there was nearly no backfire and now there are complains that every 4th kill is a backfire one. Actually i think everyone should have atleast minor chances to die regardless of rp, bulletcount and bulletshot. Even 1 bullet should have a chance to kill, a very small chance but a chance. Defending and Attacking should be atleast 1:1 maybe with random mods...like at day time attacking gets a slight mod at night defending is better.
Than we would have more wars, were people can actually react.
shooting should be a gamble where you don't know if you survive or not, atleast if you shoot face to face, without carkill and preshoot.
Last versions people complained that there was nearly no backfire and now there are complains that every 4th kill is a backfire one. Actually i think everyone should have atleast minor chances to die regardless of rp, bulletcount and bulletshot. Even 1 bullet should have a chance to kill, a very small chance but a chance. Defending and Attacking should be atleast 1:1 maybe with random mods...like at day time attacking gets a slight mod at night defending is better.
Than we would have more wars, were people can actually react.
Maybe but when I have a MUCH stronger account like in my kill attempt I expect to survive and certainly not die of 40k backfire. WIth 20k I didnt do any damage, not even kill a bodyguard but would have gotten lethal backfire back if my target had double backfire.
Like I said when I have 200k more bullets in stock I expect to survive backfire of the much weaker target.
I also found the reason why we saw backfire kills after 3 bodyguards were killed and target didnt come online..however I'll just report it to the devs. I'd really recommend no wars.
Attackers should have advantage always , so if you train bgs for attack , and shoot 60k bullets you should kill your target without any problem , exept if he is full deff , bf kills sucks...Its about 1 mounth of ranking , spent money on dcs etc , and for what?For dying in one single click and all again from Soldier or Aso...So , advantage to attackers , and lets strategy wins (balls for attack = win) ty o/
Arcanine (15:30:48 - 15-07)
Anonymous at 15:27:25 on 15/07:
shooting should be a gamble where you don't know if you survive or not, atleast if you shoot face to face, without carkill and preshoot.
Last versions people complained that there was nearly no backfire and now there are complains that every 4th kill is a backfire one. Actually i think everyone should have atleast minor chances to die regardless of rp, bulletcount and bulletshot. Even 1 bullet should have a chance to kill, a very small chance but a chance. Defending and Attacking should be atleast 1:1 maybe with random mods...like at day time attacking gets a slight mod at night defending is better.
Than we would have more wars, were people can actually react.
shooting should be a gamble where you don't know if you survive or not, atleast if you shoot face to face, without carkill and preshoot.
Last versions people complained that there was nearly no backfire and now there are complains that every 4th kill is a backfire one. Actually i think everyone should have atleast minor chances to die regardless of rp, bulletcount and bulletshot. Even 1 bullet should have a chance to kill, a very small chance but a chance. Defending and Attacking should be atleast 1:1 maybe with random mods...like at day time attacking gets a slight mod at night defending is better.
Than we would have more wars, were people can actually react.
Maybe but when I have a MUCH stronger account like in my kill attempt I expect to survive and certainly not die of 40k backfire. WIth 20k I didnt do any damage, not even kill a bodyguard but would have gotten lethal backfire back if my target had double backfire.
Like I said when I have 200k more bullets in stock I expect to survive backfire of the much weaker target.
I also found the reason why we saw backfire kills after 3 bodyguards were killed and target didnt come online..however I'll just report it to the devs. I'd really recommend no wars.
Anonymous (15:27:25 - 15-07)
shooting should be a gamble where you don't know if you survive or not, atleast if you shoot face to face, without carkill and preshoot.
Last versions people complained that there was nearly no backfire and now there are complains that every 4th kill is a backfire one. Actually i think everyone should have atleast minor chances to die regardless of rp, bulletcount and bulletshot. Even 1 bullet should have a chance to kill, a very small chance but a chance. Defending and Attacking should be atleast 1:1 maybe with random mods...like at day time attacking gets a slight mod at night defending is better.
Than we would have more wars, were people can actually react.
Last versions people complained that there was nearly no backfire and now there are complains that every 4th kill is a backfire one. Actually i think everyone should have atleast minor chances to die regardless of rp, bulletcount and bulletshot. Even 1 bullet should have a chance to kill, a very small chance but a chance. Defending and Attacking should be atleast 1:1 maybe with random mods...like at day time attacking gets a slight mod at night defending is better.
Than we would have more wars, were people can actually react.
Arcanine (15:17:14 - 15-07)
Anonymous at 15:15:56 on 15/07:
shooting is risky nowadays
shooting is risky nowadays
Not risky, it's suicide. When you face a decent brug who has Vic and Ike on attack you are dead.
Arcanine (15:13:33 - 15-07)
You were driving around town as you saw ****speeding around town in a shiny new motor - you decided to give chase!
You tossed 3 molotovs at the car, exploding the engine!
You duck behind the wall of a nearby garage as ***** pulls a Smith & Wesson .357 Magnum out and whirls around and pulls the trigger...
***** suffered but is still alive.
Your enemy tried to strike back, his bullets found their way through your body, but you survived.
2 of your guards were slaughtered in the counterattack!
-----------------------------
I shot 20k to test the backfire. My target had same bacfkire so I got 20k bullets back. Results.. defender has 65 health left. Ok nothing weird.
I had 39 HEALTH left after receiving 20k backfire. So even 40k would have killed me. Easily.
Both are Brugs and exactly same RP. However I have 200k(!!!!!) more bullets in stock and was capo.
So even with 200k more bullets in stock I get killed with 40k backfire.
We both had 3 defensive bodyguards and Vic+Ike trained on attack.
Backfire is fucked. Bigtime.
You tossed 3 molotovs at the car, exploding the engine!
You duck behind the wall of a nearby garage as ***** pulls a Smith & Wesson .357 Magnum out and whirls around and pulls the trigger...
***** suffered but is still alive.
Your enemy tried to strike back, his bullets found their way through your body, but you survived.
2 of your guards were slaughtered in the counterattack!
-----------------------------
I shot 20k to test the backfire. My target had same bacfkire so I got 20k bullets back. Results.. defender has 65 health left. Ok nothing weird.
I had 39 HEALTH left after receiving 20k backfire. So even 40k would have killed me. Easily.
Both are Brugs and exactly same RP. However I have 200k(!!!!!) more bullets in stock and was capo.
So even with 200k more bullets in stock I get killed with 40k backfire.
We both had 3 defensive bodyguards and Vic+Ike trained on attack.
Backfire is fucked. Bigtime.
Anonymous (15:03:14 - 15-07)
Anonymous at 09:40:48 on 15/07:
bets on next war?
1. turks against righelli
2. grav-pact cleaning krays & spinoza & inzerillo (i hope krays know that they had backups for them in first war)
3. maraz against jannissary (do they have a non-shoot deal or not?)
4. big fam cleaning small fam due to disagreements
bets on next war?
1. turks against righelli
2. grav-pact cleaning krays & spinoza & inzerillo (i hope krays know that they had backups for them in first war)
3. maraz against jannissary (do they have a non-shoot deal or not?)
4. big fam cleaning small fam due to disagreements
5. The Bully war. Gravano & Bloods (all 20 of them) Vs Small Families in Balti & Detroit
prolly ur bg setup is wrong,u used 2 att bg to kill a brug whereelse the other acct have 3 set bg,i kill a chief while im lc and survive while the other party bullets is higher than me, i think bg setup is important in this game just my 10 cent
Sorry, doesnt work that way. I also found another interesting result in my next 20k attempt but gonna test it 1 more time before I post it here:P
It's a very,very strange result
Last version was the best KA , I don't know why they change things -.- from good to bad , and from bad to worse...