» Menu
» OB/Site News
» Articles
 |
» Barafranca News
» Comments of Mickay
General Comments & Major Rumors
17:19:48 - 06-05
04-05 Violenza under fire!
23:41:04 - 04-05
"Reflexive (Top Violenza): Success brings enemies..."
That's quite an arrogant remark... made worse by the fact that it is blatantly untrue thus far this version.
That's quite an arrogant remark... made worse by the fact that it is blatantly untrue thus far this version.
General Comments & Major Rumors
00:52:20 - 21-04
Conversations regarding politics do not belong here. This is a game forum for an online game. If you want to debate America's foreign policy bother me on IRC or find a political forum somewhere else.
There are idiots in every country, and some of them find their way onto online games like this and post hateful remarks/images. Don't allow them to ruin the atmosphere of a game geared towards mutual enjoyment.
There are idiots in every country, and some of them find their way onto online games like this and post hateful remarks/images. Don't allow them to ruin the atmosphere of a game geared towards mutual enjoyment.
19-04 Marazzino + Anadolu ↔ Conflict
21:37:00 - 19-04
Leonhart at 21:32:19 on 19/04:
Or maybe they just can't shoot you cause they died before they could. Idk, we've died too fast to figure that out am i right? But we're getting a bit offtopic, cupcake. So we'll leave it as it is :P
Spy at 21:28:12 on 19/04:
If they dont shoot me, or any of the high ups, then yeh... Cowards ^^
Leonhart at 21:25:32 on 19/04:
I mean calling attackers the cowards. Not you playing smart or dumb. I'd do the same cupcake ;)
Just not the coward part, know what i mean, cupcake?
Spy at 21:22:23 on 19/04:
Maybe you didnt notice, but I was offline for quite some time.
Which means that by the time I wrote that, I was a defender, now, should I play smart and stay offline or play dumb and be online the whole time as a defender... hmmmmm ohhh I know...
And, maybe I already shot someone, or multiple people, how dyou know ?
And it's easy to talk when ur already dead isnt it ? ;)
Dont be so quick to judge, cupcake ;)
-Spy
Leonhart at 21:05:27 on 19/04:
Asking to be shot, instead of shooting himself, that's really badass idd.
And rip conflict. Nice game.
Asking to be shot, instead of shooting himself, that's really badass idd.
And rip conflict. Nice game.
Which means that by the time I wrote that, I was a defender, now, should I play smart and stay offline or play dumb and be online the whole time as a defender... hmmmmm ohhh I know...
And, maybe I already shot someone, or multiple people, how dyou know ?
And it's easy to talk when ur already dead isnt it ? ;)
Dont be so quick to judge, cupcake ;)
-Spy
I mean calling attackers the cowards. Not you playing smart or dumb. I'd do the same cupcake ;)
Just not the coward part, know what i mean, cupcake?
Or maybe they just can't shoot you cause they died before they could. Idk, we've died too fast to figure that out am i right? But we're getting a bit offtopic, cupcake. So we'll leave it as it is :P
This whole exchange was exceeding gay.
17-04 End of the Cold War
15:58:24 - 19-04
ehh, previous post was me :p
17-04 End of the Cold War
04:00:49 - 18-04
Impact at 03:37:20 on 18/04:
Idd this KA heavily favors defenders, which will limit wars because all fams will want to be shot not shoot.
Idd this KA heavily favors defenders, which will limit wars because all fams will want to be shot not shoot.
Eh I don't think KA favors attackers or defenders particularly given the success of attackers in the war 2 days ago. Now, some of the same attackers from 2 days ago were some of the 'defenders' today. The only common thread I see is that these fams, who succeeded as both attackers and defenders have a high Fam Value per member. That is too say, take their family value, and divide it by the number of members they have, and the resulting total is higher than the families they opposed. This is just what I'm seeing, and from a designers stand point, that would be a fair and sensible factor in determining strength of players. Feel free to disagree.
11-04 Why are there no wars?
07:09:20 - 16-04
Let's be honest, the old school days are gone. The days of wars before the first fam came up died once tops decided to rely on returning rankers rather than strategy and jockeying for position. The smaller fams nowadays allow themselves to be pawns for the big guys, rather than being individualistic. The good, aggressive tops are either gone, too busy, or in the top 4 fams who consistently shape the game. This games aggressiveness died somewhere before 3.0
General Comments & Major Rumors
07:58:36 - 31-03
wtf is all this hullabalu!!
to be objective, lackeys suck,
cuz of lackeys there is no difference between noobs and players, only bullets were making difference, with bullet lackeys there will be none
if u wanna have fun try to play the game, whats funny without logging in ?
Uh this is not true at all. In fact I think Lackey's have helped in several ways. For the guys on top calling the shots the playing field is now evened. Before, families who had a couple guys with access to banks of computers, dominated because they could have a 50% scripted fam. Now, it's more financially viable to invest in dcodes than scripts to rank, which means that the numbers of automatically ranked accounts are more evenly spread amongst the families. The solid tops don't need to be rank sluts to get things to work (though many tops are.. in fact many tops become tops just because of their ranking abilities, which is counter intuitive and a retarded MO). The normal players just get a helping hand from lackeys. Lackey imo are just fine. Evens the playing field and the hard working admins of Omerta earn a bit more coin.
The thing that hurts normal players and tops alike is the 300% rank limit. Load of bullshit. This means players who are true rank sluts can always be caught, and Top's who manage to keep their families alive (hopefully via strategy as opposed to being a GOD DAMN PUSSY AND NOT SHOOTING) don't really maintain much of an advantage over their opponents.