Thursday - July 27th - 2017
» Menu

» Login

» OB/Site News

Omerta News Integration
Comments: 22 - Views: 5290 - Votes: 0
War rating
Comments: 6 - Views: 7699 - Votes: 1
Reporters Wanted!
Comments: 2 - Views: 12205 - Votes: 3
» Articles
Date Comments Rating

General Comments & Major Rumors
Comments: 41,443 - Views: 2,700,606 - Votes: 61
27-06 When Saints become angels
Comments: 21 - Views: 1,904 - Votes: 0
21-06 Bullets lost!
Comments: 11 - Views: 1,105 - Votes: 0
15-06 Let's pray for the best!
Comments: 22 - Views: 1,952 - Votes: 0
13-06 Some Riot
Comments: 16 - Views: 2,091 - Votes: 1
09-06 TGIF
Comments: 35 - Views: 3,611 - Votes: 1
05-06 Discordia's Fall
Comments: 5 - Views: 764 - Votes: 1
03-06 Hammer Struck, Godhand Rises!
Comments: 5 - Views: 661 - Votes: 1
15-05 The Final Chapter!! - RESET Friday! (26/05) updated
Comments: 20 - Views: 1,501 - Votes: 1
05-05 Crossfire Favour
Comments: 27 - Views: 1,885 - Votes: 1
go back
go forward
» Barafranca News

» Mafia News

» Online last 15 minutes

Guests: 148
Total members: 2815
Online: 0 (0%)
Members:
17-07 Hide posts from anonymous users!
Author: sbanks
Last updated: 2201d 18h 58m 56s ago by sbanks
Comments: 13
Views: 1,967
Votes: 0 (0 average)
Version: 3.2
Involved families:
article
Are you sick of all the "anonymous" spam in articles? Or the people who are to lazy to register a nickname?

Then this function is something for you!

At the Preferences page we added an option which allows you to hide posts from anonymous users.



Click here if you want to activate/check it right away!
ishma Portugal (14:58:56 - 22-07)
Link Quote
* likes
LL Aruba (00:05:09 - 22-07)
Link Quote
Wicked. Now just a "Hide posts from users who's name starts with A-Z /0-9" and then I'm completely satisfied.
"Anonymous" (01:53:20 - 18-07)
Link Quote
Make me needing to find a name instead of automatically putting "Anonymous"
irrelevant (21:51:17 - 17-07)
Link Quote
That just irrelevant!!!

Not all people want to register, simple as that,

if you want all to be non anonymous, just force the registrations and end with anonymous posts

simple!!
Kyra Seychelles (20:04:34 - 17-07)
Link Quote
easier to take them out of the convo for the time ur reading then skipping every 2 posts :P
Tycho Netherlands (20:00:46 - 17-07)
Link Quote
Rix at 19:57:26 on 17/07:
Tycho at 19:52:36 on 17/07:
Why not just disable it?
Sometimes they're not logged in, or indeed too lazy.
Better just too disabled it.
Number of reasons:
-I don't expect much people will use this option
-Sometimes non-logged in users (this option blocks those as well,not just by "Anonymous") are actually helpful/non-spam.
-This option is great for a temporary measure, for instance when there is a discussion or so with a lot of anonymous users in it who just talk bullshit and you want to shut them off for the time the discussion lasts.

Of course disabling non-logged in posts is, as always, a good subject for discussion, and we should always re-evaluate our policy on it.
Well.. Idc about those lazy ppl who cry, flame, blame or spam as anonymous. I just ignore them xD
But i agree on it and reason
sbanks Guatemala (20:00:14 - 17-07)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 19:55:36 on 17/07:
If someone non anonymous reacts on someone anonymous, you won't get what the hell they are talking about, either delete the anonymous people, or let them be there. This option is useless :)

several people asked me for this option, but there are always 2 sides of the medal ofcourse
Tycho Netherlands (19:58:15 - 17-07)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 19:55:36 on 17/07:
If someone non anonymous reacts on someone anonymous, you won't get what the hell they are talking about, either delete the anonymous people, or let them be there. This option is useless :)
Agree.
Then i prefer a "stay-logged-in" thingy then hide anonymously ppl
Rix Netherlands (19:58:08 - 17-07)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 19:55:36 on 17/07:
If someone non anonymous reacts on someone anonymous, you won't get what the hell they are talking about, either delete the anonymous people, or let them be there. This option is useless :)
You will see the quote, if the responder used that.
Rix Netherlands (19:57:26 - 17-07)
Link Quote
Tycho at 19:52:36 on 17/07:
Why not just disable it?
Sometimes they're not logged in, or indeed too lazy.
Better just too disabled it.
Number of reasons:
-I don't expect much people will use this option
-Sometimes non-logged in users (this option blocks those as well,not just by "Anonymous") are actually helpful/non-spam.
-This option is great for a temporary measure, for instance when there is a discussion or so with a lot of anonymous users in it who just talk bullshit and you want to shut them off for the time the discussion lasts.

Of course disabling non-logged in posts is, as always, a good subject for discussion, and we should always re-evaluate our policy on it.
Anonymous (19:55:36 - 17-07)
Link Quote
If someone non anonymous reacts on someone anonymous, you won't get what the hell they are talking about, either delete the anonymous people, or let them be there. This option is useless :)
Tycho Netherlands (19:52:36 - 17-07)
Link Quote
Why not just disable it?
Sometimes they're not logged in, or indeed too lazy.
Better just too disabled it. Or remove this function again xD
Anonymous (19:50:28 - 17-07)
Link Quote
nooooo:(

howe must i troll now