Ofcourse

do i need to get teamviewer for 1st page?

So its either cheat or dont be competetive? sounds fun

Righello and sharo hmm ok Well never heard of both of them did they won a prize for world peace?

Justice xD

ye it is.

is it true?

True bitchboy righello Quitted together with sharo.
Nothing much left..

Anyone Else? can't that remember name,

Admins are aware of it, and there will be no akilling :)

Haha, with only one active admin around you won't see much akills.

Percentage online: 100%

Days online: 2D 12H 15M

yea.. wonder if we gonna see any Akills on the 100% obvious cheats.. probably not but it would be a nice change compared to last vers

Ellocors

licavoli anyone know who were the tops?

most of it cant be implemented i suppose because all of these are too cloudy and supposing it can be implemented, it would only work only when admins are objective which is fiercely wrong at this point.

And the second...

shut up bitch

There we have it. OB's most constructive criticism award goes too...

bullshit

Users Alive: 1,591
Quite shite. V5 is pretty nice but mass pacting makes more and more people to leave.

I made a ticket with a suggestion about the mass pacting issue last round but admin never cared to reply, I don't even know if they read the ticket. Thought I would let you guys know what I wrote and see what you all think about my idea.

I think they need to shame the mass blooders. Perhaps that would make a few tops think twice before joing in on a big pact and instead try to play for themselves.

Many tops are now chasing a golden star like they are worth a ton of gold. So one way to shame them is to give out shame stars instead of golden stars. A shame star could be a red star, or any other symbol or color, and when you put the mouse pointer on it a box would show where it reads "I'm a covard v5.2", like it does with the golden stars where it says "Top ranker" or whatever the reason for the star is.

The gold star can be turned on and off but this star would always be visible, no way to turn it off. Perhaps if they win a fair round the shame star could be replaced by a golden star, but that would be the only way.

It is obviously hard to make exact rules for when a shame star is to be handed out instead of a gold star. So I belive admins would have to judge every round specificly and then decide what to do. There would be some guidelines but no exact rules. I know a lot of players feel the admins are crooked but every player can see when shame stars are needed so if the admins wouldn't hand them out it would be too obvious they are dirty (if they are will say) so I don't think that would be a big problem.

E.g. last round everybody, except perhaps the top of Winter and their dogs, can agree that shame stars would have been appropriate instead of golden stars. Don, sotto and consi of all the families would all have gotten a shame star and only one with a golden star would be top buster. That means top three of Winterhill, Summerhill, Infezione, Prestige, Motisi, Pentagram, Pentahouse, Mit, Jitem, Krays and probably a few more that I have forgot would have gotten a red shame star, more than 30 players would be shown as pussies to everyone.

I know there are ways to get around this but it would be a start at least. Something needs to be done. When players don't care to change the admins gotta try and change them.

Just my two cents, feel free to comment with your own thoughts.