» Menu
» OB/Site News
» Articles
» Barafranca News
 |
|
article
General Comments & Major Rumors section.
Everyone knows where this section is for, keep it clean from flaming and only posts in english are allowed.
Everyone knows where this section is for, keep it clean from flaming and only posts in english are allowed.
Anonymous (10:29:15 - 27-05)
Anonymous at 21:48:00 on 26/05:
Maraz guy ? lol
You better check the Hall of Shame to see who had clone armies
Anonymous at 16:32:20 on 25/05:
Do you think Maraz guy or Grannqe bother to do GC with every single member their clone armies?
Anonymous at 21:35:35 on 24/05:
I for one use lackeys as much as I can but I also do all the group crimes I can as well. I would be supprised if it turned out that almost no one using lackeys for ranking never do group crimes...
Anonymous at 21:20:29 on 24/05:
And that would be worse than the status quo, where people basically hire lackeys for their accounts and do shit otherwise?
Anonymous at 13:33:34 on 24/05:
this will only mean that people will use teamviewer more and more to do groupcrimes if they get that important. Teamviewer is already used way too much (not by me, but i know it is used by many people).
Anonymous at 05:02:39 on 24/05:
I have a totally different suggestion.
Make Group Crimes a mandatory part of ranking.
What I mean is
You can't promote from shoppie to asso if you have not 100% RP AND done at least 5 heists (just to name a number). For asso to mobster make it 10 heists.
For Mobster to soldier 20 Heists + 5 OC etc.
That has two effects.
First Group Crimes would actually matter (again) and pure lackey accounts can't compete with manual accounts.
Seconldy it would decrease the ranking speed. At least in the higher tire ranks. Because as we all know there is a cool down on OCs and MOCs.
If you have to do at least 3 MOCs (again just naming a number) in order to get LC you will be stuck at LC for quite a bit. -> a longer version.
OFC for that to be effective the actual rank has to gain in importance/weigh in comparission to mere rankpoints. What I mean is, if a LC with #5 in rankpoints can easily kill a brug who is likesay #20 in rankpoints, than this whole excercise is in vain. Simple solution, make group crimes more relevant for rank progress.
I have a totally different suggestion.
Make Group Crimes a mandatory part of ranking.
What I mean is
You can't promote from shoppie to asso if you have not 100% RP AND done at least 5 heists (just to name a number). For asso to mobster make it 10 heists.
For Mobster to soldier 20 Heists + 5 OC etc.
That has two effects.
First Group Crimes would actually matter (again) and pure lackey accounts can't compete with manual accounts.
Seconldy it would decrease the ranking speed. At least in the higher tire ranks. Because as we all know there is a cool down on OCs and MOCs.
If you have to do at least 3 MOCs (again just naming a number) in order to get LC you will be stuck at LC for quite a bit. -> a longer version.
OFC for that to be effective the actual rank has to gain in importance/weigh in comparission to mere rankpoints. What I mean is, if a LC with #5 in rankpoints can easily kill a brug who is likesay #20 in rankpoints, than this whole excercise is in vain. Simple solution, make group crimes more relevant for rank progress.
this will only mean that people will use teamviewer more and more to do groupcrimes if they get that important. Teamviewer is already used way too much (not by me, but i know it is used by many people).
And that would be worse than the status quo, where people basically hire lackeys for their accounts and do shit otherwise?
Do you think Maraz guy or Grannqe bother to do GC with every single member their clone armies?
You better check the Hall of Shame to see who had clone armies
sure let me suck my own dick (07:28:33 - 27-05)
where can i see who won all the shits?XD hof
Anonymous (06:40:04 - 27-05)
Field fairies united? Lol 😓😓😍😘
Anonymous (21:48:00 - 26-05)
Anonymous at 16:32:20 on 25/05:
Do you think Maraz guy or Grannqe bother to do GC with every single member their clone armies?
Anonymous at 21:35:35 on 24/05:
I for one use lackeys as much as I can but I also do all the group crimes I can as well. I would be supprised if it turned out that almost no one using lackeys for ranking never do group crimes...
Anonymous at 21:20:29 on 24/05:
And that would be worse than the status quo, where people basically hire lackeys for their accounts and do shit otherwise?
Anonymous at 13:33:34 on 24/05:
this will only mean that people will use teamviewer more and more to do groupcrimes if they get that important. Teamviewer is already used way too much (not by me, but i know it is used by many people).
Anonymous at 05:02:39 on 24/05:
I have a totally different suggestion.
Make Group Crimes a mandatory part of ranking.
What I mean is
You can't promote from shoppie to asso if you have not 100% RP AND done at least 5 heists (just to name a number). For asso to mobster make it 10 heists.
For Mobster to soldier 20 Heists + 5 OC etc.
That has two effects.
First Group Crimes would actually matter (again) and pure lackey accounts can't compete with manual accounts.
Seconldy it would decrease the ranking speed. At least in the higher tire ranks. Because as we all know there is a cool down on OCs and MOCs.
If you have to do at least 3 MOCs (again just naming a number) in order to get LC you will be stuck at LC for quite a bit. -> a longer version.
OFC for that to be effective the actual rank has to gain in importance/weigh in comparission to mere rankpoints. What I mean is, if a LC with #5 in rankpoints can easily kill a brug who is likesay #20 in rankpoints, than this whole excercise is in vain. Simple solution, make group crimes more relevant for rank progress.
I have a totally different suggestion.
Make Group Crimes a mandatory part of ranking.
What I mean is
You can't promote from shoppie to asso if you have not 100% RP AND done at least 5 heists (just to name a number). For asso to mobster make it 10 heists.
For Mobster to soldier 20 Heists + 5 OC etc.
That has two effects.
First Group Crimes would actually matter (again) and pure lackey accounts can't compete with manual accounts.
Seconldy it would decrease the ranking speed. At least in the higher tire ranks. Because as we all know there is a cool down on OCs and MOCs.
If you have to do at least 3 MOCs (again just naming a number) in order to get LC you will be stuck at LC for quite a bit. -> a longer version.
OFC for that to be effective the actual rank has to gain in importance/weigh in comparission to mere rankpoints. What I mean is, if a LC with #5 in rankpoints can easily kill a brug who is likesay #20 in rankpoints, than this whole excercise is in vain. Simple solution, make group crimes more relevant for rank progress.
this will only mean that people will use teamviewer more and more to do groupcrimes if they get that important. Teamviewer is already used way too much (not by me, but i know it is used by many people).
And that would be worse than the status quo, where people basically hire lackeys for their accounts and do shit otherwise?
Do you think Maraz guy or Grannqe bother to do GC with every single member their clone armies?
You better check the Hall of Shame to see who had clone armies
Anonymous (20:44:27 - 26-05)
sure let me suck my own dick at 20:41:39 on 26/05:
what is GC ????????????
grannnqe at 12:47:18 on 26/05:
Who the fuck on the world would bother to do gc's with more than 7clones when u would get 100kk+ weekly with just buying them a plane lol
Anonymous at 16:32:20 on 25/05:
Do you think Maraz guy or Grannqe bother to do GC with every single member their clone armies?
Anonymous at 21:35:35 on 24/05:
I for one use lackeys as much as I can but I also do all the group crimes I can as well. I would be supprised if it turned out that almost no one using lackeys for ranking never do group crimes...
Anonymous at 21:20:29 on 24/05:
And that would be worse than the status quo, where people basically hire lackeys for their accounts and do shit otherwise?
Anonymous at 13:33:34 on 24/05:
this will only mean that people will use teamviewer more and more to do groupcrimes if they get that important. Teamviewer is already used way too much (not by me, but i know it is used by many people).
Anonymous at 05:02:39 on 24/05:
I have a totally different suggestion.
Make Group Crimes a mandatory part of ranking.
What I mean is
You can't promote from shoppie to asso if you have not 100% RP AND done at least 5 heists (just to name a number). For asso to mobster make it 10 heists.
For Mobster to soldier 20 Heists + 5 OC etc.
That has two effects.
First Group Crimes would actually matter (again) and pure lackey accounts can't compete with manual accounts.
Seconldy it would decrease the ranking speed. At least in the higher tire ranks. Because as we all know there is a cool down on OCs and MOCs.
If you have to do at least 3 MOCs (again just naming a number) in order to get LC you will be stuck at LC for quite a bit. -> a longer version.
OFC for that to be effective the actual rank has to gain in importance/weigh in comparission to mere rankpoints. What I mean is, if a LC with #5 in rankpoints can easily kill a brug who is likesay #20 in rankpoints, than this whole excercise is in vain. Simple solution, make group crimes more relevant for rank progress.
I have a totally different suggestion.
Make Group Crimes a mandatory part of ranking.
What I mean is
You can't promote from shoppie to asso if you have not 100% RP AND done at least 5 heists (just to name a number). For asso to mobster make it 10 heists.
For Mobster to soldier 20 Heists + 5 OC etc.
That has two effects.
First Group Crimes would actually matter (again) and pure lackey accounts can't compete with manual accounts.
Seconldy it would decrease the ranking speed. At least in the higher tire ranks. Because as we all know there is a cool down on OCs and MOCs.
If you have to do at least 3 MOCs (again just naming a number) in order to get LC you will be stuck at LC for quite a bit. -> a longer version.
OFC for that to be effective the actual rank has to gain in importance/weigh in comparission to mere rankpoints. What I mean is, if a LC with #5 in rankpoints can easily kill a brug who is likesay #20 in rankpoints, than this whole excercise is in vain. Simple solution, make group crimes more relevant for rank progress.
this will only mean that people will use teamviewer more and more to do groupcrimes if they get that important. Teamviewer is already used way too much (not by me, but i know it is used by many people).
And that would be worse than the status quo, where people basically hire lackeys for their accounts and do shit otherwise?
Do you think Maraz guy or Grannqe bother to do GC with every single member their clone armies?
Who the fuck on the world would bother to do gc's with more than 7clones when u would get 100kk+ weekly with just buying them a plane lol
what is GC ????????????
groupcrimes
sure let me suck my own dick (20:41:39 - 26-05)
grannnqe at 12:47:18 on 26/05:
Who the fuck on the world would bother to do gc's with more than 7clones when u would get 100kk+ weekly with just buying them a plane lol
Anonymous at 16:32:20 on 25/05:
Do you think Maraz guy or Grannqe bother to do GC with every single member their clone armies?
Anonymous at 21:35:35 on 24/05:
I for one use lackeys as much as I can but I also do all the group crimes I can as well. I would be supprised if it turned out that almost no one using lackeys for ranking never do group crimes...
Anonymous at 21:20:29 on 24/05:
And that would be worse than the status quo, where people basically hire lackeys for their accounts and do shit otherwise?
Anonymous at 13:33:34 on 24/05:
this will only mean that people will use teamviewer more and more to do groupcrimes if they get that important. Teamviewer is already used way too much (not by me, but i know it is used by many people).
Anonymous at 05:02:39 on 24/05:
I have a totally different suggestion.
Make Group Crimes a mandatory part of ranking.
What I mean is
You can't promote from shoppie to asso if you have not 100% RP AND done at least 5 heists (just to name a number). For asso to mobster make it 10 heists.
For Mobster to soldier 20 Heists + 5 OC etc.
That has two effects.
First Group Crimes would actually matter (again) and pure lackey accounts can't compete with manual accounts.
Seconldy it would decrease the ranking speed. At least in the higher tire ranks. Because as we all know there is a cool down on OCs and MOCs.
If you have to do at least 3 MOCs (again just naming a number) in order to get LC you will be stuck at LC for quite a bit. -> a longer version.
OFC for that to be effective the actual rank has to gain in importance/weigh in comparission to mere rankpoints. What I mean is, if a LC with #5 in rankpoints can easily kill a brug who is likesay #20 in rankpoints, than this whole excercise is in vain. Simple solution, make group crimes more relevant for rank progress.
I have a totally different suggestion.
Make Group Crimes a mandatory part of ranking.
What I mean is
You can't promote from shoppie to asso if you have not 100% RP AND done at least 5 heists (just to name a number). For asso to mobster make it 10 heists.
For Mobster to soldier 20 Heists + 5 OC etc.
That has two effects.
First Group Crimes would actually matter (again) and pure lackey accounts can't compete with manual accounts.
Seconldy it would decrease the ranking speed. At least in the higher tire ranks. Because as we all know there is a cool down on OCs and MOCs.
If you have to do at least 3 MOCs (again just naming a number) in order to get LC you will be stuck at LC for quite a bit. -> a longer version.
OFC for that to be effective the actual rank has to gain in importance/weigh in comparission to mere rankpoints. What I mean is, if a LC with #5 in rankpoints can easily kill a brug who is likesay #20 in rankpoints, than this whole excercise is in vain. Simple solution, make group crimes more relevant for rank progress.
this will only mean that people will use teamviewer more and more to do groupcrimes if they get that important. Teamviewer is already used way too much (not by me, but i know it is used by many people).
And that would be worse than the status quo, where people basically hire lackeys for their accounts and do shit otherwise?
Do you think Maraz guy or Grannqe bother to do GC with every single member their clone armies?
Who the fuck on the world would bother to do gc's with more than 7clones when u would get 100kk+ weekly with just buying them a plane lol
what is GC ????????????
grannnqe (12:47:18 - 26-05)
Anonymous at 16:32:20 on 25/05:
Do you think Maraz guy or Grannqe bother to do GC with every single member their clone armies?
Anonymous at 21:35:35 on 24/05:
I for one use lackeys as much as I can but I also do all the group crimes I can as well. I would be supprised if it turned out that almost no one using lackeys for ranking never do group crimes...
Anonymous at 21:20:29 on 24/05:
And that would be worse than the status quo, where people basically hire lackeys for their accounts and do shit otherwise?
Anonymous at 13:33:34 on 24/05:
this will only mean that people will use teamviewer more and more to do groupcrimes if they get that important. Teamviewer is already used way too much (not by me, but i know it is used by many people).
Anonymous at 05:02:39 on 24/05:
I have a totally different suggestion.
Make Group Crimes a mandatory part of ranking.
What I mean is
You can't promote from shoppie to asso if you have not 100% RP AND done at least 5 heists (just to name a number). For asso to mobster make it 10 heists.
For Mobster to soldier 20 Heists + 5 OC etc.
That has two effects.
First Group Crimes would actually matter (again) and pure lackey accounts can't compete with manual accounts.
Seconldy it would decrease the ranking speed. At least in the higher tire ranks. Because as we all know there is a cool down on OCs and MOCs.
If you have to do at least 3 MOCs (again just naming a number) in order to get LC you will be stuck at LC for quite a bit. -> a longer version.
OFC for that to be effective the actual rank has to gain in importance/weigh in comparission to mere rankpoints. What I mean is, if a LC with #5 in rankpoints can easily kill a brug who is likesay #20 in rankpoints, than this whole excercise is in vain. Simple solution, make group crimes more relevant for rank progress.
I have a totally different suggestion.
Make Group Crimes a mandatory part of ranking.
What I mean is
You can't promote from shoppie to asso if you have not 100% RP AND done at least 5 heists (just to name a number). For asso to mobster make it 10 heists.
For Mobster to soldier 20 Heists + 5 OC etc.
That has two effects.
First Group Crimes would actually matter (again) and pure lackey accounts can't compete with manual accounts.
Seconldy it would decrease the ranking speed. At least in the higher tire ranks. Because as we all know there is a cool down on OCs and MOCs.
If you have to do at least 3 MOCs (again just naming a number) in order to get LC you will be stuck at LC for quite a bit. -> a longer version.
OFC for that to be effective the actual rank has to gain in importance/weigh in comparission to mere rankpoints. What I mean is, if a LC with #5 in rankpoints can easily kill a brug who is likesay #20 in rankpoints, than this whole excercise is in vain. Simple solution, make group crimes more relevant for rank progress.
this will only mean that people will use teamviewer more and more to do groupcrimes if they get that important. Teamviewer is already used way too much (not by me, but i know it is used by many people).
And that would be worse than the status quo, where people basically hire lackeys for their accounts and do shit otherwise?
Do you think Maraz guy or Grannqe bother to do GC with every single member their clone armies?
Who the fuck on the world would bother to do gc's with more than 7clones when u would get 100kk+ weekly with just buying them a plane lol
Anonymous (16:32:20 - 25-05)
Anonymous at 21:35:35 on 24/05:
I for one use lackeys as much as I can but I also do all the group crimes I can as well. I would be supprised if it turned out that almost no one using lackeys for ranking never do group crimes...
Anonymous at 21:20:29 on 24/05:
And that would be worse than the status quo, where people basically hire lackeys for their accounts and do shit otherwise?
Anonymous at 13:33:34 on 24/05:
this will only mean that people will use teamviewer more and more to do groupcrimes if they get that important. Teamviewer is already used way too much (not by me, but i know it is used by many people).
Anonymous at 05:02:39 on 24/05:
I have a totally different suggestion.
Make Group Crimes a mandatory part of ranking.
What I mean is
You can't promote from shoppie to asso if you have not 100% RP AND done at least 5 heists (just to name a number). For asso to mobster make it 10 heists.
For Mobster to soldier 20 Heists + 5 OC etc.
That has two effects.
First Group Crimes would actually matter (again) and pure lackey accounts can't compete with manual accounts.
Seconldy it would decrease the ranking speed. At least in the higher tire ranks. Because as we all know there is a cool down on OCs and MOCs.
If you have to do at least 3 MOCs (again just naming a number) in order to get LC you will be stuck at LC for quite a bit. -> a longer version.
OFC for that to be effective the actual rank has to gain in importance/weigh in comparission to mere rankpoints. What I mean is, if a LC with #5 in rankpoints can easily kill a brug who is likesay #20 in rankpoints, than this whole excercise is in vain. Simple solution, make group crimes more relevant for rank progress.
I have a totally different suggestion.
Make Group Crimes a mandatory part of ranking.
What I mean is
You can't promote from shoppie to asso if you have not 100% RP AND done at least 5 heists (just to name a number). For asso to mobster make it 10 heists.
For Mobster to soldier 20 Heists + 5 OC etc.
That has two effects.
First Group Crimes would actually matter (again) and pure lackey accounts can't compete with manual accounts.
Seconldy it would decrease the ranking speed. At least in the higher tire ranks. Because as we all know there is a cool down on OCs and MOCs.
If you have to do at least 3 MOCs (again just naming a number) in order to get LC you will be stuck at LC for quite a bit. -> a longer version.
OFC for that to be effective the actual rank has to gain in importance/weigh in comparission to mere rankpoints. What I mean is, if a LC with #5 in rankpoints can easily kill a brug who is likesay #20 in rankpoints, than this whole excercise is in vain. Simple solution, make group crimes more relevant for rank progress.
this will only mean that people will use teamviewer more and more to do groupcrimes if they get that important. Teamviewer is already used way too much (not by me, but i know it is used by many people).
And that would be worse than the status quo, where people basically hire lackeys for their accounts and do shit otherwise?
Do you think Maraz guy or Grannqe bother to do GC with every single member their clone armies?
Anonymous (15:50:33 - 25-05)
Anonymous at 13:28:12 on 25/05:
Its rly sad to see the left over fams just sit and watch around , this stage
I just hope , admins will say tomorow 'we removed the HOF' , then i will really laugh whit those huggers
I also cant believe the inkills at this stage ... game is over ffs , just have fun !
Blame the HOF for the short versions ...
Anonymous at 12:35:46 on 25/05:
I think it's somewhat funny how people try to find a reason why the game is running worse every version and end up blaming game mechanics.
If you want a 'never ending version' or longer versions overall, then it might be a good solution to stop cluttering your side until it has over 50% of all highranks. I think anarchy has not been in a single war in which they even had a remote chance of losing that war or even getting shot back at because of massive ratios. Now I just pointed out anarchy but the majority of families no longer dares to start a war if they don't have a 5:1 ratio + backup for counters.
If you want to change this game so much, take no official bloods and aim to win this version by yourself (meaning 1 fam standing).
It's players that mess up this game, game mechanics are a small part of it.
I think it's somewhat funny how people try to find a reason why the game is running worse every version and end up blaming game mechanics.
If you want a 'never ending version' or longer versions overall, then it might be a good solution to stop cluttering your side until it has over 50% of all highranks. I think anarchy has not been in a single war in which they even had a remote chance of losing that war or even getting shot back at because of massive ratios. Now I just pointed out anarchy but the majority of families no longer dares to start a war if they don't have a 5:1 ratio + backup for counters.
If you want to change this game so much, take no official bloods and aim to win this version by yourself (meaning 1 fam standing).
It's players that mess up this game, game mechanics are a small part of it.
Its rly sad to see the left over fams just sit and watch around , this stage
I just hope , admins will say tomorow 'we removed the HOF' , then i will really laugh whit those huggers
I also cant believe the inkills at this stage ... game is over ffs , just have fun !
Blame the HOF for the short versions ...
Not just the HOF, people would lock up the version with big groups before the introduction of the HoF already. These days it has just become more of a race of who can get most people to crawl up their ass instead of playing this game the way it was designed to be played like.
I wonder why people create such big groups of players, the win of Anarchy this version and several other families in the previous versions are not much of an achievement at all. It would've been more of an achievement in a negative way if they weren't able to do so. It's like putting Barcelona in the 2nd league, win it and being proud of it. Totally has no value.
It's time for the admins to make a 1 fam to end rule I guess because the players don't have the nutts in their underwear to do so themselves. If families still decide to lockup the game, do random akill streaks of 30 each time, so it might even happen a smaller, more useless family, ends up on top. ;)
Anonymous (13:28:12 - 25-05)
Anonymous at 12:35:46 on 25/05:
I think it's somewhat funny how people try to find a reason why the game is running worse every version and end up blaming game mechanics.
If you want a 'never ending version' or longer versions overall, then it might be a good solution to stop cluttering your side until it has over 50% of all highranks. I think anarchy has not been in a single war in which they even had a remote chance of losing that war or even getting shot back at because of massive ratios. Now I just pointed out anarchy but the majority of families no longer dares to start a war if they don't have a 5:1 ratio + backup for counters.
If you want to change this game so much, take no official bloods and aim to win this version by yourself (meaning 1 fam standing).
It's players that mess up this game, game mechanics are a small part of it.
I think it's somewhat funny how people try to find a reason why the game is running worse every version and end up blaming game mechanics.
If you want a 'never ending version' or longer versions overall, then it might be a good solution to stop cluttering your side until it has over 50% of all highranks. I think anarchy has not been in a single war in which they even had a remote chance of losing that war or even getting shot back at because of massive ratios. Now I just pointed out anarchy but the majority of families no longer dares to start a war if they don't have a 5:1 ratio + backup for counters.
If you want to change this game so much, take no official bloods and aim to win this version by yourself (meaning 1 fam standing).
It's players that mess up this game, game mechanics are a small part of it.
Its rly sad to see the left over fams just sit and watch around , this stage
I just hope , admins will say tomorow 'we removed the HOF' , then i will really laugh whit those huggers
I also cant believe the inkills at this stage ... game is over ffs , just have fun !
Blame the HOF for the short versions ...
Anonymous (12:35:46 - 25-05)
I think it's somewhat funny how people try to find a reason why the game is running worse every version and end up blaming game mechanics.
If you want a 'never ending version' or longer versions overall, then it might be a good solution to stop cluttering your side until it has over 50% of all highranks. I think anarchy has not been in a single war in which they even had a remote chance of losing that war or even getting shot back at because of massive ratios. Now I just pointed out anarchy but the majority of families no longer dares to start a war if they don't have a 5:1 ratio + backup for counters.
If you want to change this game so much, take no official bloods and aim to win this version by yourself (meaning 1 fam standing).
It's players that mess up this game, game mechanics are a small part of it.
If you want a 'never ending version' or longer versions overall, then it might be a good solution to stop cluttering your side until it has over 50% of all highranks. I think anarchy has not been in a single war in which they even had a remote chance of losing that war or even getting shot back at because of massive ratios. Now I just pointed out anarchy but the majority of families no longer dares to start a war if they don't have a 5:1 ratio + backup for counters.
If you want to change this game so much, take no official bloods and aim to win this version by yourself (meaning 1 fam standing).
It's players that mess up this game, game mechanics are a small part of it.
Toby the goldfish at 11:32:01 on 25/05:
Yeah Peterpanairlines got akilled for using it last version.
Yeah Peterpanairlines got akilled for using it last version.
Why else would you use Teamviewer to play omerta? The game provides everyone with a chat client.
Toby the goldfish (11:32:01 - 25-05)
Anonymous at 10:57:26 on 25/05:
Teamviewer is used by family tops since the dawn of times I belive it is part of the game already and nothing will change it...
or at 10:24:52 on 25/05:
you share screen and 10 people can play once account
Anonymous at 23:03:47 on 24/05:
Whats wrong with teamviewer?
Whats wrong with teamviewer?
you share screen and 10 people can play once account
Teamviewer is used by family tops since the dawn of times I belive it is part of the game already and nothing will change it...
Yeah Peterpanairlines got akilled for using it last version.
Anonymous (10:57:26 - 25-05)
or at 10:24:52 on 25/05:
you share screen and 10 people can play once account
Anonymous at 23:03:47 on 24/05:
Whats wrong with teamviewer?
Whats wrong with teamviewer?
you share screen and 10 people can play once account
Teamviewer is used by family tops since the dawn of times I belive it is part of the game already and nothing will change it...
local (10:33:11 - 25-05)
Agon you are a pussy
localgimpi :D
localgimpi :D
or (10:24:52 - 25-05)
Anonymous at 23:03:47 on 24/05:
Whats wrong with teamviewer?
Whats wrong with teamviewer?
you share screen and 10 people can play once account
Anonymous (23:03:47 - 24-05)
Whats wrong with teamviewer?
Anonymous (21:35:35 - 24-05)
Anonymous at 21:20:29 on 24/05:
And that would be worse than the status quo, where people basically hire lackeys for their accounts and do shit otherwise?
Anonymous at 13:33:34 on 24/05:
this will only mean that people will use teamviewer more and more to do groupcrimes if they get that important. Teamviewer is already used way too much (not by me, but i know it is used by many people).
Anonymous at 05:02:39 on 24/05:
I have a totally different suggestion.
Make Group Crimes a mandatory part of ranking.
What I mean is
You can't promote from shoppie to asso if you have not 100% RP AND done at least 5 heists (just to name a number). For asso to mobster make it 10 heists.
For Mobster to soldier 20 Heists + 5 OC etc.
That has two effects.
First Group Crimes would actually matter (again) and pure lackey accounts can't compete with manual accounts.
Seconldy it would decrease the ranking speed. At least in the higher tire ranks. Because as we all know there is a cool down on OCs and MOCs.
If you have to do at least 3 MOCs (again just naming a number) in order to get LC you will be stuck at LC for quite a bit. -> a longer version.
OFC for that to be effective the actual rank has to gain in importance/weigh in comparission to mere rankpoints. What I mean is, if a LC with #5 in rankpoints can easily kill a brug who is likesay #20 in rankpoints, than this whole excercise is in vain. Simple solution, make group crimes more relevant for rank progress.
I have a totally different suggestion.
Make Group Crimes a mandatory part of ranking.
What I mean is
You can't promote from shoppie to asso if you have not 100% RP AND done at least 5 heists (just to name a number). For asso to mobster make it 10 heists.
For Mobster to soldier 20 Heists + 5 OC etc.
That has two effects.
First Group Crimes would actually matter (again) and pure lackey accounts can't compete with manual accounts.
Seconldy it would decrease the ranking speed. At least in the higher tire ranks. Because as we all know there is a cool down on OCs and MOCs.
If you have to do at least 3 MOCs (again just naming a number) in order to get LC you will be stuck at LC for quite a bit. -> a longer version.
OFC for that to be effective the actual rank has to gain in importance/weigh in comparission to mere rankpoints. What I mean is, if a LC with #5 in rankpoints can easily kill a brug who is likesay #20 in rankpoints, than this whole excercise is in vain. Simple solution, make group crimes more relevant for rank progress.
this will only mean that people will use teamviewer more and more to do groupcrimes if they get that important. Teamviewer is already used way too much (not by me, but i know it is used by many people).
And that would be worse than the status quo, where people basically hire lackeys for their accounts and do shit otherwise?
Anonymous (21:20:29 - 24-05)
Anonymous at 13:33:34 on 24/05:
this will only mean that people will use teamviewer more and more to do groupcrimes if they get that important. Teamviewer is already used way too much (not by me, but i know it is used by many people).
Anonymous at 05:02:39 on 24/05:
I have a totally different suggestion.
Make Group Crimes a mandatory part of ranking.
What I mean is
You can't promote from shoppie to asso if you have not 100% RP AND done at least 5 heists (just to name a number). For asso to mobster make it 10 heists.
For Mobster to soldier 20 Heists + 5 OC etc.
That has two effects.
First Group Crimes would actually matter (again) and pure lackey accounts can't compete with manual accounts.
Seconldy it would decrease the ranking speed. At least in the higher tire ranks. Because as we all know there is a cool down on OCs and MOCs.
If you have to do at least 3 MOCs (again just naming a number) in order to get LC you will be stuck at LC for quite a bit. -> a longer version.
OFC for that to be effective the actual rank has to gain in importance/weigh in comparission to mere rankpoints. What I mean is, if a LC with #5 in rankpoints can easily kill a brug who is likesay #20 in rankpoints, than this whole excercise is in vain. Simple solution, make group crimes more relevant for rank progress.
I have a totally different suggestion.
Make Group Crimes a mandatory part of ranking.
What I mean is
You can't promote from shoppie to asso if you have not 100% RP AND done at least 5 heists (just to name a number). For asso to mobster make it 10 heists.
For Mobster to soldier 20 Heists + 5 OC etc.
That has two effects.
First Group Crimes would actually matter (again) and pure lackey accounts can't compete with manual accounts.
Seconldy it would decrease the ranking speed. At least in the higher tire ranks. Because as we all know there is a cool down on OCs and MOCs.
If you have to do at least 3 MOCs (again just naming a number) in order to get LC you will be stuck at LC for quite a bit. -> a longer version.
OFC for that to be effective the actual rank has to gain in importance/weigh in comparission to mere rankpoints. What I mean is, if a LC with #5 in rankpoints can easily kill a brug who is likesay #20 in rankpoints, than this whole excercise is in vain. Simple solution, make group crimes more relevant for rank progress.
this will only mean that people will use teamviewer more and more to do groupcrimes if they get that important. Teamviewer is already used way too much (not by me, but i know it is used by many people).
And that would be worse than the status quo, where people basically hire lackeys for their accounts and do shit otherwise?
I have a totally different suggestion.
Make Group Crimes a mandatory part of ranking.
What I mean is
You can't promote from shoppie to asso if you have not 100% RP AND done at least 5 heists (just to name a number). For asso to mobster make it 10 heists.
For Mobster to soldier 20 Heists + 5 OC etc.
That has two effects.
First Group Crimes would actually matter (again) and pure lackey accounts can't compete with manual accounts.
Seconldy it would decrease the ranking speed. At least in the higher tire ranks. Because as we all know there is a cool down on OCs and MOCs.
If you have to do at least 3 MOCs (again just naming a number) in order to get LC you will be stuck at LC for quite a bit. -> a longer version.
OFC for that to be effective the actual rank has to gain in importance/weigh in comparission to mere rankpoints. What I mean is, if a LC with #5 in rankpoints can easily kill a brug who is likesay #20 in rankpoints, than this whole excercise is in vain. Simple solution, make group crimes more relevant for rank progress.
I know that admins been working on this, when i came back and played some DM i takled to dot an she showed me some screenshots of what they were working on it had to do brining back manual advantages, for example a brug needed x amount of groupcrimes / honorpoints / busts etc to get to bruglione i liked that idea alot when they showed me, though knowing this is omerta it will take probably 5 years to implement it