Saturday - December 28th - 2024
» Menu

» Login

» OB/Site News

Omerta News Integration
Comments: 58 - Views: 55195 - Votes: 0
War rating
Comments: 10 - Views: 26438 - Votes: 4
Reporters Wanted!
Comments: 2 - Views: 18362 - Votes: 3
» Articles
Date Comments Rating

General Comments & Major Rumors
Comments: 57,999 - Views: 16,059,673 - Votes: 81
Article is Locked!
Endless Struggle !
Comments: 514 - Views: 18,103 - Votes: 0
23-09 Reset → 30 September 2022, Friday → 12:00 OT
Comments: 72 - Views: 8,955 - Votes: 0
30-09 Welcome to Round #40!
Comments: 2 - Views: 2,211 - Votes: 0
19-09 Congratulations Reichsthaler!
Comments: 0 - Views: 2,075 - Votes: 0
01-09 Not Penny's boat..
Comments: 72 - Views: 18,560 - Votes: 0
21-08 First Family!
Comments: 6 - Views: 2,628 - Votes: 0
12-08 Welcome to Round #39
Comments: 5 - Views: 2,528 - Votes: 0
03-08 Reset → 12 August 2022, Friday → 10:00 OT
Comments: 17 - Views: 5,310 - Votes: 0
27-07 Congratulations Vengeance!
Comments: 8 - Views: 2,760 - Votes: 0
go back
go forward
» Barafranca News

» Online last 15 minutes

Guests: 561
Total members: 3751
Online: 0 (0%)
Members:
General Comments & Major Rumors
Author: sbanks
Last updated: 4688d 5h 51m 39s ago by MrWhite
Comments: 57,999
Views: 16,059,673
Votes: 81 (4.5 average)
article
General Comments & Major Rumors section.

Everyone knows where this section is for, keep it clean from flaming and only posts in english are allowed.
comments

Add a YouTube movie Add an image Add a link/url Help
Anonymous (20:59:05 - 12-05)
Link Quote
[Vaffanculo] Familybank: -$34,472,973 to $228,565,013
Anonymous (20:54:17 - 12-05)
Link Quote
Vaffanculo vs all omerta :D
Anonymous (20:48:49 - 12-05)
Link Quote
[Vaffanculo] Familybank: -$22,907,406 to $263,635,281
Anonymous (20:32:35 - 12-05)
Link Quote
[Vaffanculo] Familybank: -$35,110,807 to $286,495,756
Anonymous (20:01:52 - 12-05)
Link Quote
zenga at 19:41:26 on 12/05:
Anonymous at 18:22:48 on 12/05:
now bg's are fucked up too
except bodyguards and lackeys, what's the difference between current version and 1.0?
I wasn't around then and I'd really appreciate if someone tells me the difference
and I don't mean the playerbase or the dupes,scripts etc; only the game itself
just some tweaks here and there, not an actual upgrade imo
Pretty much every time they attempted to add more depth / change course; the playerbase wanted them to revert the changes. The silly thing is that the players seems to want always the opposite of what is current. In 2.2 they wanted stronger backfire, in 2.3 BF was king and everyone wanted 2.2 back. It's always been like that.

Anonymous at 18:22:48 on 12/05:but suddenly every single player has to pay to keep playing
what the hell happened? why suddenly they need that much of extra cash?
they somehow managed to keep the game running from 1.0 to 3.1 orso, till Lackeys, did they not?
It's your own choice to pay them. You can still play the game without paying a single cent, be it legit by manually ranking or by scripting. The only difference is that you pay omerta now to script rather than some dodgy dude. That is the sole reason why lackeys were invented. Not to take away the manual ranking.

yea but it was just some little tweaks then, just like I said, never a real update. kinda proved my point
only new bodyguards in 3.0 was a proper change, yet it failed too now again

manual ranking is no option atm :') that's so stupid and ridiculous I can't even explain it properly
you can only be a buster without Lackeys, but then you'll have to pay again to remove click limit, so you can properly bust
and if you want to rank properly it's your only choice to pay and use Lackeys
that's not "my own choice" to pay them, I'm being forced to pay if I "really" want to play
and excuse me for not wanting use scripts


harrassing any muslims lately btw?
zenga (19:41:26 - 12-05)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 18:22:48 on 12/05:
now bg's are fucked up too
except bodyguards and lackeys, what's the difference between current version and 1.0?
I wasn't around then and I'd really appreciate if someone tells me the difference
and I don't mean the playerbase or the dupes,scripts etc; only the game itself
just some tweaks here and there, not an actual upgrade imo
Pretty much every time they attempted to add more depth / change course; the playerbase wanted them to revert the changes. The silly thing is that the players seems to want always the opposite of what is current. In 2.2 they wanted stronger backfire, in 2.3 BF was king and everyone wanted 2.2 back. It's always been like that.

Anonymous at 18:22:48 on 12/05:but suddenly every single player has to pay to keep playing
what the hell happened? why suddenly they need that much of extra cash?
they somehow managed to keep the game running from 1.0 to 3.1 orso, till Lackeys, did they not?
It's your own choice to pay them. You can still play the game without paying a single cent, be it legit by manually ranking or by scripting. The only difference is that you pay omerta now to script rather than some dodgy dude. That is the sole reason why lackeys were invented. Not to take away the manual ranking.
Anonymous (19:00:18 - 12-05)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 17:49:15 on 12/05:
Anonymous at 17:43:59 on 12/05:
Anonymous at 17:27:49 on 12/05:
Anonymous at 17:18:13 on 12/05:
Anonymous at 17:11:06 on 12/05:
Anonymous at 16:46:35 on 12/05:
http://www.trustpilot.com/review/barafranca.com

give em some reviews, maybe brando will get his head out of a place where the sun dont shine!

I'm going to assume it's you who wrote 1 or more of those reviews, and what's the point in doing this if i may ask? If you want to let brando know about how you feel okay, but telling people to 'never play this game' won't help improve the game. Even if the admins improve the game where it's bug-free and a lot of fun again it won't matter now, cause you just told everyone to never play this game..

In order for the game to be 'fun' again, the bugs need to be fixed and they can make changes to the game etc but the 1 thing that made omerta fun in the past was that there were so many players. It wasn't just 2 giant pacts going against eachother, and people being spammed with random fam invites from the rank of shoplifter. Fams needed to shoot another fam to create space for themselves, and players needed to pay fams to join them. Bringing such an amount of players back into the game would make it fun, so you telling people to 'never play this game' doesn't help in any kind of way.

all those 3 reviews are honest truths as far as I see, they would be misleading people into a scam if written otherwise

Did they not fix the bugs of the last version? Or 2 versions ago w/e it was.. And do you honestly believe the admins don't give a shit? Have you ever thought that maybe it takes longer than 5 seconds to fix a bug after you report it? Have you ever been a developer on a game? If you haven't you probably don't know how much work it can be to go through all the code to find a solution, and if you have and think you can do a better job than they're doing now, then by all means go work for them and fix this game that we all love (or loved).

Just don't use that spoilt little child attitude of 'I told them there was a bug and 5 minutes later they hadn't even fixed it yet ;('

why do they keep launching their shit before its safe to use. every new implement they add got x number of bugs even tho they claim its tested. just get real and realize they are acting like pure amateurs in these bug scenarios, would u tell people to buy a house u know is faling to pieces ?

There is a difference between being able to test it inside your office with some employees, and having hundreds or thousand of people playing it and finding additional bugs, this happens in every game. Same as it happens that sometimes a house gets sold and it turns out afterwards there is something wrong in a small place that they hadn't been able to check.

It is not like they purposely released bugged versions, this game is their income, the more bugs there are in the game the less money they will make cause people will refuse to buy DC's or refuse to play the game. They want this game to be bug-free as much as you do.

so u think people actually tried to exploit a bug that didnt make it able to fire freaking noodles ? :P and btw doesnt matter if its 5 players or 1k players, they claimed it was done and was moving on to doing some good for the manual players.
So far i doubt they have lost that much in dc income because they kept promising it would be better(and the 'giveaway' made it kinda ok) but at some point people just get enough of those lies.
Every single time they have sent out a new implement in the last 4 or 5 versions, it didnt take long before bugs was out(its their job to find these bugs and close them before sending the product out, u dont buy a laptop to find out the graphic card is broken). KCode even said he needed more time but Brando was in such hurry to get it out because of all the bugs in previous one, look what happened to the new one, loaded with bugs and daily breakdowns. simple things as layout isnt even working properly.

u sure sound like someone that could fit the job as an admin ;)
Anonymous (18:47:51 - 12-05)
Link Quote
Vtc at 18:40:24 on 12/05:
Less QQ moar PEW PEW ^^

but this shit is a daylight robbery QQ
Vtc Netherlands (18:40:24 - 12-05)
Link Quote
Less QQ moar PEW PEW ^^
Anonymous (18:25:22 - 12-05)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 18:22:48 on 12/05:
now bg's are fucked up too
except bodyguards and lackeys, what's the difference between current version and 1.0?
I wasn't around then and I'd really appreciate if someone tells me the difference
and I don't mean the playerbase or the dupes,scripts etc; only the game itself
just some tweaks here and there, not an actual upgrade imo

but suddenly every single player has to pay to keep playing
what the hell happened? why suddenly they need that much of extra cash?
they somehow managed to keep the game running from 1.0 to 3.1 orso, till Lackeys, did they not?
they got greedy, like most game companies do after they see they have a decent sized playerbase.
Anonymous (18:22:48 - 12-05)
Link Quote
now bg's are fucked up too
except bodyguards and lackeys, what's the difference between current version and 1.0?
I wasn't around then and I'd really appreciate if someone tells me the difference
and I don't mean the playerbase or the dupes,scripts etc; only the game itself
just some tweaks here and there, not an actual upgrade imo

but suddenly every single player has to pay to keep playing
what the hell happened? why suddenly they need that much of extra cash?
they somehow managed to keep the game running from 1.0 to 3.1 orso, till Lackeys, did they not?
Anonymous (18:01:41 - 12-05)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 17:49:15 on 12/05:
There is a difference between being able to test it inside your office with some employees, and having hundreds or thousand of people playing it and finding additional bugs, this happens in every game. Same as it happens that sometimes a house gets sold and it turns out afterwards there is something wrong in a small place that they hadn't been able to check.

It is not like they purposely released bugged versions, this game is their income, the more bugs there are in the game the less money they will make cause people will refuse to buy DC's or refuse to play the game. They want this game to be bug-free as much as you do.

it doesn't happen this often in every game, here it happens after every single thing they do
and it's not a free-to-play game anymore, not even close, everyone has to keep paying one way or another; they have to make it worth the money being paid
with all that extra cash, people expecting to see some nice things, pretty naturally
or atleast want them to keep the game clean :')

so if they cant handle anything and doesnt improve a single thing, yet still keep collecting insane amounts of money, those reviews are the ones they'll get. because that's the truth
Anonymous (17:49:15 - 12-05)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 17:43:59 on 12/05:
Anonymous at 17:27:49 on 12/05:
Anonymous at 17:18:13 on 12/05:
Anonymous at 17:11:06 on 12/05:
Anonymous at 16:46:35 on 12/05:
http://www.trustpilot.com/review/barafranca.com

give em some reviews, maybe brando will get his head out of a place where the sun dont shine!

I'm going to assume it's you who wrote 1 or more of those reviews, and what's the point in doing this if i may ask? If you want to let brando know about how you feel okay, but telling people to 'never play this game' won't help improve the game. Even if the admins improve the game where it's bug-free and a lot of fun again it won't matter now, cause you just told everyone to never play this game..

In order for the game to be 'fun' again, the bugs need to be fixed and they can make changes to the game etc but the 1 thing that made omerta fun in the past was that there were so many players. It wasn't just 2 giant pacts going against eachother, and people being spammed with random fam invites from the rank of shoplifter. Fams needed to shoot another fam to create space for themselves, and players needed to pay fams to join them. Bringing such an amount of players back into the game would make it fun, so you telling people to 'never play this game' doesn't help in any kind of way.

all those 3 reviews are honest truths as far as I see, they would be misleading people into a scam if written otherwise

Did they not fix the bugs of the last version? Or 2 versions ago w/e it was.. And do you honestly believe the admins don't give a shit? Have you ever thought that maybe it takes longer than 5 seconds to fix a bug after you report it? Have you ever been a developer on a game? If you haven't you probably don't know how much work it can be to go through all the code to find a solution, and if you have and think you can do a better job than they're doing now, then by all means go work for them and fix this game that we all love (or loved).

Just don't use that spoilt little child attitude of 'I told them there was a bug and 5 minutes later they hadn't even fixed it yet ;('

why do they keep launching their shit before its safe to use. every new implement they add got x number of bugs even tho they claim its tested. just get real and realize they are acting like pure amateurs in these bug scenarios, would u tell people to buy a house u know is faling to pieces ?

There is a difference between being able to test it inside your office with some employees, and having hundreds or thousand of people playing it and finding additional bugs, this happens in every game. Same as it happens that sometimes a house gets sold and it turns out afterwards there is something wrong in a small place that they hadn't been able to check.

It is not like they purposely released bugged versions, this game is their income, the more bugs there are in the game the less money they will make cause people will refuse to buy DC's or refuse to play the game. They want this game to be bug-free as much as you do.
Anonymous (17:43:59 - 12-05)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 17:27:49 on 12/05:
Anonymous at 17:18:13 on 12/05:
Anonymous at 17:11:06 on 12/05:
Anonymous at 16:46:35 on 12/05:
http://www.trustpilot.com/review/barafranca.com

give em some reviews, maybe brando will get his head out of a place where the sun dont shine!

I'm going to assume it's you who wrote 1 or more of those reviews, and what's the point in doing this if i may ask? If you want to let brando know about how you feel okay, but telling people to 'never play this game' won't help improve the game. Even if the admins improve the game where it's bug-free and a lot of fun again it won't matter now, cause you just told everyone to never play this game..

In order for the game to be 'fun' again, the bugs need to be fixed and they can make changes to the game etc but the 1 thing that made omerta fun in the past was that there were so many players. It wasn't just 2 giant pacts going against eachother, and people being spammed with random fam invites from the rank of shoplifter. Fams needed to shoot another fam to create space for themselves, and players needed to pay fams to join them. Bringing such an amount of players back into the game would make it fun, so you telling people to 'never play this game' doesn't help in any kind of way.

all those 3 reviews are honest truths as far as I see, they would be misleading people into a scam if written otherwise

Did they not fix the bugs of the last version? Or 2 versions ago w/e it was.. And do you honestly believe the admins don't give a shit? Have you ever thought that maybe it takes longer than 5 seconds to fix a bug after you report it? Have you ever been a developer on a game? If you haven't you probably don't know how much work it can be to go through all the code to find a solution, and if you have and think you can do a better job than they're doing now, then by all means go work for them and fix this game that we all love (or loved).

Just don't use that spoilt little child attitude of 'I told them there was a bug and 5 minutes later they hadn't even fixed it yet ;('

why do they keep launching their shit before its safe to use. every new implement they add got x number of bugs even tho they claim its tested. just get real and realize they are acting like pure amateurs in these bug scenarios, would u tell people to buy a house u know is faling to pieces ?
Anonymous (17:27:49 - 12-05)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 17:18:13 on 12/05:
Anonymous at 17:11:06 on 12/05:
Anonymous at 16:46:35 on 12/05:
http://www.trustpilot.com/review/barafranca.com

give em some reviews, maybe brando will get his head out of a place where the sun dont shine!

I'm going to assume it's you who wrote 1 or more of those reviews, and what's the point in doing this if i may ask? If you want to let brando know about how you feel okay, but telling people to 'never play this game' won't help improve the game. Even if the admins improve the game where it's bug-free and a lot of fun again it won't matter now, cause you just told everyone to never play this game..

In order for the game to be 'fun' again, the bugs need to be fixed and they can make changes to the game etc but the 1 thing that made omerta fun in the past was that there were so many players. It wasn't just 2 giant pacts going against eachother, and people being spammed with random fam invites from the rank of shoplifter. Fams needed to shoot another fam to create space for themselves, and players needed to pay fams to join them. Bringing such an amount of players back into the game would make it fun, so you telling people to 'never play this game' doesn't help in any kind of way.

all those 3 reviews are honest truths as far as I see, they would be misleading people into a scam if written otherwise

Did they not fix the bugs of the last version? Or 2 versions ago w/e it was.. And do you honestly believe the admins don't give a shit? Have you ever thought that maybe it takes longer than 5 seconds to fix a bug after you report it? Have you ever been a developer on a game? If you haven't you probably don't know how much work it can be to go through all the code to find a solution, and if you have and think you can do a better job than they're doing now, then by all means go work for them and fix this game that we all love (or loved).

Just don't use that spoilt little child attitude of 'I told them there was a bug and 5 minutes later they hadn't even fixed it yet ;('
Anonymous (17:18:13 - 12-05)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 17:11:06 on 12/05:
Anonymous at 16:46:35 on 12/05:
http://www.trustpilot.com/review/barafranca.com

give em some reviews, maybe brando will get his head out of a place where the sun dont shine!

I'm going to assume it's you who wrote 1 or more of those reviews, and what's the point in doing this if i may ask? If you want to let brando know about how you feel okay, but telling people to 'never play this game' won't help improve the game. Even if the admins improve the game where it's bug-free and a lot of fun again it won't matter now, cause you just told everyone to never play this game..

In order for the game to be 'fun' again, the bugs need to be fixed and they can make changes to the game etc but the 1 thing that made omerta fun in the past was that there were so many players. It wasn't just 2 giant pacts going against eachother, and people being spammed with random fam invites from the rank of shoplifter. Fams needed to shoot another fam to create space for themselves, and players needed to pay fams to join them. Bringing such an amount of players back into the game would make it fun, so you telling people to 'never play this game' doesn't help in any kind of way.

all those 3 reviews are honest truths as far as I see, they would be misleading people into a scam if written otherwise
Anonymous (17:11:06 - 12-05)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 16:46:35 on 12/05:
http://www.trustpilot.com/review/barafranca.com

give em some reviews, maybe brando will get his head out of a place where the sun dont shine!

I'm going to assume it's you who wrote 1 or more of those reviews, and what's the point in doing this if i may ask? If you want to let brando know about how you feel okay, but telling people to 'never play this game' won't help improve the game. Even if the admins improve the game where it's bug-free and a lot of fun again it won't matter now, cause you just told everyone to never play this game..

In order for the game to be 'fun' again, the bugs need to be fixed and they can make changes to the game etc but the 1 thing that made omerta fun in the past was that there were so many players. It wasn't just 2 giant pacts going against eachother, and people being spammed with random fam invites from the rank of shoplifter. Fams needed to shoot another fam to create space for themselves, and players needed to pay fams to join them. Bringing such an amount of players back into the game would make it fun, so you telling people to 'never play this game' doesn't help in any kind of way.
Anonymous (16:47:22 - 12-05)
Link Quote
here's a cute mother's day joke for you guys

"thanks mom for letting dad finish inside of you"
Anonymous (16:46:35 - 12-05)
Link Quote
http://www.trustpilot.com/review/barafranca.com

give em some reviews, maybe brando will get his head out of a place where the sun dont shine!
Anonymous (16:04:36 - 12-05)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 15:49:19 on 12/05:
Anonymous at 15:40:18 on 12/05:
Anonymous at 15:33:04 on 12/05:
Just confirmed, Rollback at 19:00 OT

News post will be posted soon

\o/

haha
funny how we're having a rollback on a regular basis

"24-04 Rollback!"

Days without a rollback: 18
next time 20 days pls, we can do it

and you believe him? ;)

after witnessing all the fails, now I always assume crew will make the worst decision xD