Wednesday - March 29th - 2017
» Menu

» Login

» OB/Site News

Omerta News Integration
Comments: 22 - Views: 4257 - Votes: 0
War rating
Comments: 6 - Views: 6825 - Votes: 1
Reporters Wanted!
Comments: 2 - Views: 11523 - Votes: 3
» Articles
Date Comments Rating

General Comments & Major Rumors
Comments: 40,815 - Views: 2,644,349 - Votes: 60
25-03 Endgame shenanigans!
Comments: 55 - Views: 1,616 - Votes: 2
18-03 Individualism!
Comments: 112 - Views: 2,595 - Votes: 0
10-03 Initiation of Puzzle!
Comments: 88 - Views: 4,145 - Votes: 1
05-03 Return of Admin's Wrath!
Comments: 13 - Views: 767 - Votes: 1
01-03 A-killed Fam
Comments: 47 - Views: 1,158 - Votes: 0
14-02 Hall of Winners! - ROM Active!
Comments: 28 - Views: 1,572 - Votes: 0
09-02 Disregarded, Yet Not Forgiven!
Comments: 50 - Views: 1,939 - Votes: 1
07-02 Boredom & War
Comments: 113 - Views: 3,593 - Votes: 2
06-02 Loyalty, Betrayal & Revenge!
Comments: 54 - Views: 2,086 - Votes: 1
go back
go forward
» Barafranca News

» Mafia News

» Online last 15 minutes

Guests: 95
Total members: 2780
Online: 0 (0%)
Members:
06-01 R E S E T!
Author: sbanks
Last updated: 1175d 21h 46m 42s ago by MrWhite
Comments: 54
Views: 3,304
Votes: 0 (0 average)
Version: 4.4.1
article
Omerta will reset Wednesday 8 january at 11 OT
statements
Dear all,

First of all I like to wish you all a happy new year!

We?re going to reset this version of Omerta this Wednesday at 11 OT.
The winners of this version can be seen in the Hall of Fame. Congratulations to all of you. We will send the vouchers to you by email.

Have a nice day,
Bramblerose
Anonymous (16:11:22 - 08-01)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 12:36:47 on 08/01:
Anonymous at 12:00:13 on 08/01:
Paris at 10:07:49 on 08/01:
Papagoose at 23:30:45 on 06/01:
Although i must say it was a pretty nice version for our side (Faffie) a bit of balancing would be a great benefit for the game. Setting a maximum of possible fam members and slightly adjust of KS would greatly improve the gameplay and fun.
The chance that the massblooding (like in this version) will results in early winning will also be reduced by setting a max to fam members.

Thanks to all Faffie members for all their effort in this version and several versions before. I am proud to be part of it.

Greetings Papagoose _o_
I won't comment Faffie and its playing style, but there have to be something done with global KA idd. Not slightly, there need to be huge changes to take effect on other players. Re-ranking nowdays is simply wasting of time. And about maximum members per family... If, for example Aeterna have 250 members, why they can't make 2 families with 125 members? Everything is up to us (players-tops), admins/devs can't do a shit about how Aeterna plays, how Faffie plays or how any other family plays. But hall of fame destroyed the game, obviously.
Peace

You're a hater Paris, nothing else to say. Faffie + Aeterna have changed the game in a positive way. Just like vaffanculo did a couple versions ago, they showed it's possible to break the pacts and alliances and win with very few families. Vaffanculo was a pioneer on that area winning it with just a total of 4 families. Aeterna and Faffie only needed 3. This is very much in contrast to the past in which most versions ended with 10-15 families and the winners often had commections to most of those 15.

I'm not saying we are there yet, there's still progress possible and needed but it is certainly better than big pacts and alliances that lock the game with half of all families that started the version.
lol the only similarity between faffie and vaffa is the use of semi public rank/bust scripts.

Furthermore I have never seen vaffa kiss ass as much as faffie kissed aeternas ass. they even alowed aerterna to kill most of their bloods, yet you speak of breaking away of pacts


Your last sentence makes absolutely no sense lol. Sometimes I even doing if you even played last version. First of all anarchy was shot by marazzino. Gravano attacked Aeterna. Also Gambino chose to as1 nwo while the deal was nwo was going to get killed. Aeterna didn't even open fire on gambino. It was gambino who shot at Aeterna.

Last but not least you indeed confirmed why they broke away the pacts. If this was a pact all Faffie bloods would be alive. You're in this weird mindset thinking that if you blood Faffie none of their bloods can shoot you either. That is a pact way of thinking.

They were no pact, which means business that goes on in between your bloods is business of your bloods. You should only get involved when it gets your own family in danger. Aeterna actually wanted to play the game this way that families they did not blood them, would eventually die or aeterma would die themselves. Which is the essential concept of this game.

GL and have a lot of fun in your pacts tho, often people with your mindset are incredibly afraid of dying and need help as much help as they can.

We've seen a lot of those pact families fail hardcore when they were on their own before which is why they need 15+ families to help them out. (Think about impact fail on MC, Gravano and Liberta with several fails, Kurosawa's fails, lots of Turkish families that were #1 and would die without doing any damage).
Anonymous (12:36:47 - 08-01)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 12:00:13 on 08/01:
Paris at 10:07:49 on 08/01:
Papagoose at 23:30:45 on 06/01:
Although i must say it was a pretty nice version for our side (Faffie) a bit of balancing would be a great benefit for the game. Setting a maximum of possible fam members and slightly adjust of KS would greatly improve the gameplay and fun.
The chance that the massblooding (like in this version) will results in early winning will also be reduced by setting a max to fam members.

Thanks to all Faffie members for all their effort in this version and several versions before. I am proud to be part of it.

Greetings Papagoose _o_
I won't comment Faffie and its playing style, but there have to be something done with global KA idd. Not slightly, there need to be huge changes to take effect on other players. Re-ranking nowdays is simply wasting of time. And about maximum members per family... If, for example Aeterna have 250 members, why they can't make 2 families with 125 members? Everything is up to us (players-tops), admins/devs can't do a shit about how Aeterna plays, how Faffie plays or how any other family plays. But hall of fame destroyed the game, obviously.
Peace

You're a hater Paris, nothing else to say. Faffie + Aeterna have changed the game in a positive way. Just like vaffanculo did a couple versions ago, they showed it's possible to break the pacts and alliances and win with very few families. Vaffanculo was a pioneer on that area winning it with just a total of 4 families. Aeterna and Faffie only needed 3. This is very much in contrast to the past in which most versions ended with 10-15 families and the winners often had commections to most of those 15.

I'm not saying we are there yet, there's still progress possible and needed but it is certainly better than big pacts and alliances that lock the game with half of all families that started the version.
lol the only similarity between faffie and vaffa is the use of semi public rank/bust scripts.

Furthermore I have never seen vaffa kiss ass as much as faffie kissed aeternas ass. they even alowed aerterna to kill most of their bloods, yet you speak of breaking away of pacts
Anonymous (12:17:27 - 08-01)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 12:00:13 on 08/01:
Paris at 10:07:49 on 08/01:
Papagoose at 23:30:45 on 06/01:
Although i must say it was a pretty nice version for our side (Faffie) a bit of balancing would be a great benefit for the game. Setting a maximum of possible fam members and slightly adjust of KS would greatly improve the gameplay and fun.
The chance that the massblooding (like in this version) will results in early winning will also be reduced by setting a max to fam members.

Thanks to all Faffie members for all their effort in this version and several versions before. I am proud to be part of it.

Greetings Papagoose _o_
I won't comment Faffie and its playing style, but there have to be something done with global KA idd. Not slightly, there need to be huge changes to take effect on other players. Re-ranking nowdays is simply wasting of time. And about maximum members per family... If, for example Aeterna have 250 members, why they can't make 2 families with 125 members? Everything is up to us (players-tops), admins/devs can't do a shit about how Aeterna plays, how Faffie plays or how any other family plays. But hall of fame destroyed the game, obviously.
Peace

You're a hater Paris, nothing else to say. Faffie + Aeterna have changed the game in a positive way. Just like vaffanculo did a couple versions ago, they showed it's possible to break the pacts and alliances and win with very few families. Vaffanculo was a pioneer on that area winning it with just a total of 4 families. Aeterna and Faffie only needed 3. This is very much in contrast to the past in which most versions ended with 10-15 families and the winners often had commections to most of those 15.

I'm not saying we are there yet, there's still progress possible and needed but it is certainly better than big pacts and alliances that lock the game with half of all families that started the version.

lol this is insane hahaha they made it better? im not even gonna try to ...... ah nvm maybe you are just dumb
Anonymous (12:00:13 - 08-01)
Link Quote
Paris at 10:07:49 on 08/01:
Papagoose at 23:30:45 on 06/01:
Although i must say it was a pretty nice version for our side (Faffie) a bit of balancing would be a great benefit for the game. Setting a maximum of possible fam members and slightly adjust of KS would greatly improve the gameplay and fun.
The chance that the massblooding (like in this version) will results in early winning will also be reduced by setting a max to fam members.

Thanks to all Faffie members for all their effort in this version and several versions before. I am proud to be part of it.

Greetings Papagoose _o_
I won't comment Faffie and its playing style, but there have to be something done with global KA idd. Not slightly, there need to be huge changes to take effect on other players. Re-ranking nowdays is simply wasting of time. And about maximum members per family... If, for example Aeterna have 250 members, why they can't make 2 families with 125 members? Everything is up to us (players-tops), admins/devs can't do a shit about how Aeterna plays, how Faffie plays or how any other family plays. But hall of fame destroyed the game, obviously.
Peace

You're a hater Paris, nothing else to say. Faffie + Aeterna have changed the game in a positive way. Just like vaffanculo did a couple versions ago, they showed it's possible to break the pacts and alliances and win with very few families. Vaffanculo was a pioneer on that area winning it with just a total of 4 families. Aeterna and Faffie only needed 3. This is very much in contrast to the past in which most versions ended with 10-15 families and the winners often had commections to most of those 15.

I'm not saying we are there yet, there's still progress possible and needed but it is certainly better than big pacts and alliances that lock the game with half of all families that started the version.
Paris Montenegro (10:07:49 - 08-01)
Link Quote
Papagoose at 23:30:45 on 06/01:
Although i must say it was a pretty nice version for our side (Faffie) a bit of balancing would be a great benefit for the game. Setting a maximum of possible fam members and slightly adjust of KS would greatly improve the gameplay and fun.
The chance that the massblooding (like in this version) will results in early winning will also be reduced by setting a max to fam members.

Thanks to all Faffie members for all their effort in this version and several versions before. I am proud to be part of it.

Greetings Papagoose _o_
I won't comment Faffie and its playing style, but there have to be something done with global KA idd. Not slightly, there need to be huge changes to take effect on other players. Re-ranking nowdays is simply wasting of time. And about maximum members per family... If, for example Aeterna have 250 members, why they can't make 2 families with 125 members? Everything is up to us (players-tops), admins/devs can't do a shit about how Aeterna plays, how Faffie plays or how any other family plays. But hall of fame destroyed the game, obviously.
Peace
Anonymous (02:28:18 - 08-01)
Link Quote
Papagoose at 23:30:45 on 06/01:
Although i must say it was a pretty nice version for our side (Faffie) a bit of balancing would be a great benefit for the game. Setting a maximum of possible fam members and slightly adjust of KS would greatly improve the gameplay and fun.
The chance that the massblooding (like in this version) will results in early winning will also be reduced by setting a max to fam members.

Thanks to all Faffie members for all their effort in this version and several versions before. I am proud to be part of it.

Greetings Papagoose _o_

Nice Scripting version for faffie im sure is what you meant
Anonymous (02:20:06 - 08-01)
Link Quote
NewYearpresent at 10:00:30 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 08:04:31 on 07/01:
like reset 450 will help...
rip omerta. Kind sad to see the game dead.


a black page in omerta history

Ariella in hal of fame , we all know faffie is a big script/sheat family
once again
a big shame , those players ruin the game
TRUTH! that player should be listed in Hall of Shame for the obvious script they ran the entire version
Mcgee United States (22:16:03 - 07-01)
Link Quote
Sure is going to be some tough versions ahead at 6 week resets!
Ecspecialy when you don't give a fuck about lackeys and scripting, admins can burn I don't owe them nothing.
Have fun duping in a ghost town losers, ecspecialy when it's going to get reset before the Superbowl!
Suicide is always an option when you find yourself all alone in a half life with your dupe accounts lol!

Anonymous (20:23:55 - 07-01)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 19:55:21 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 18:53:25 on 07/01:
Empire/Ferrante *with Aeterna as backup, ready to shoot gambino if they jumped for faffie (Aeterna bloods) shoot Faffie so Faffie cleans them as much as possible.



Anonymous at 15:50:37 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 15:25:54 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 14:08:29 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 13:32:04 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 09:07:20 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 06:00:53 on 07/01:
Papagoose at 23:30:45 on 06/01:
Although i must say it was a pretty nice version for our side (Faffie) a bit of balancing would be a great benefit for the game. Setting a maximum of possible fam members and slightly adjust of KS would greatly improve the gameplay and fun.
The chance that the massblooding (like in this version) will results in early winning will also be reduced by setting a max to fam members.

Thanks to all Faffie members for all their effort in this version and several versions before. I am proud to be part of it.

Greetings Papagoose _o_

Bloods:
Aeterna/Lusa
Alcatraz(RIP)
Anarchy(RIP)
Gambino(RIP)
Gravano(RIP)
Savagery(RIP)

All but one of your bloods died, yet you call it a pretty nice version for your fam?

This is how omerta is supposed to be played my friend. You try saving your bloods but when your blood Aeterna is not blooded to for example gambino, then one of those families should not see the end. That's the difference between your pacts and alliances and their simple blooding.

really thats how this game should be played? Valueing one blood over the other, you're saying kissing Aerterna ass was more important then saving a blood. To finish the version perhaps you're right, but saying you had a nice version without saving 5 of your bloods, say a lot about your views on your bloods.

No it says more about your view on you bloods, they're not puppets that dance to what you say. Aeterna shot most of those bloods and Aeterna is a blood aswell. If I blood Faffie and I know Aeterna is alive, I know there is a very big chance Aeterna might be shooting me if I am not friendly with Aeterna.

Same way goes the other way around. Faffie had to shoot some of Aeterna bloods. Imagen if all bloods of the winners were alive because Faffie and Aeterna would've made deals about saving their bloods. Then this game would've ended with like 10+ families like those other noob pacts usualy do. There would've actually been no war left next to the opening war of the version.
So to summerize, Aeterna kept killing your bloods and you didnt do anything about because you were scared of them or valued them higher then the bloods they killed. I guess conflicts balls were bigger when they shot Coccada for that reason, you just looked the other way, well played :')

So to summarize you could perhaps read both paragraphs before summarizing stuff. But I can help you poor soul out if you want:
Maraz (Aeterna blood) shot Anarchy (Blood of both)
Gravano (Faffie blood) shot Aeterna and got countered on by Maraz and Aeterna.
Faffie shoots Maraz for A) Revenge for Anarchy and B) Not being directly related to Maraz.
Empire/Ferrante (Aeterna bloods) shoot Faffie so Faffie cleans them as much as possible.
Aeterna shoots Savagery (Faffie blood) because Aeterna and Savagery arent blooded so they must be cleaned.
Aeterna shoots Gambino/Alcatraz (Faffie bloods) for A) Gambino breaking the deal about finishing with 5 fams and making a sister and B) Not being bloods to Aeterna so breaking a deal = death.

It's not really a matter of valueing one blood over another, but should a family shoot their blood because of a fuckup of their other blood? I dont think so. Maybe Faffie and Aeterna should've tried to please the masses and not shoot eachothers bloods, guess which fams would be up right now? Aeterna, Lusa, Faffie, Marazzino, Savagery, Gambino, Alcatraz, Anarchy, Empire, Ferrante and Gravano. Add in the random sisterfams and asones and it would be 15 families. Would people be pleased? No, they would cry about pacting. So instead of just finding faults in everything be happy that it's over and try again tomorrow.

Empire/Ferrante (Aeterna bloods) *With Aeterna as backup, ready to shoot gambino if they jumped for Faffie* shoot Faffie so Faffie cleans them as much as possible.
You do realize Gambino jumped for Faffie, and Aeterna didn't shoot them, right? (They did shoot them a few weeks later, but that's a different story.)
Go get a brain, retard.

they stopped shooting because of it freak...
Anonymous (19:55:21 - 07-01)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 18:53:25 on 07/01:
Empire/Ferrante *with Aeterna as backup, ready to shoot gambino if they jumped for faffie (Aeterna bloods) shoot Faffie so Faffie cleans them as much as possible.



Anonymous at 15:50:37 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 15:25:54 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 14:08:29 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 13:32:04 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 09:07:20 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 06:00:53 on 07/01:
Papagoose at 23:30:45 on 06/01:
Although i must say it was a pretty nice version for our side (Faffie) a bit of balancing would be a great benefit for the game. Setting a maximum of possible fam members and slightly adjust of KS would greatly improve the gameplay and fun.
The chance that the massblooding (like in this version) will results in early winning will also be reduced by setting a max to fam members.

Thanks to all Faffie members for all their effort in this version and several versions before. I am proud to be part of it.

Greetings Papagoose _o_

Bloods:
Aeterna/Lusa
Alcatraz(RIP)
Anarchy(RIP)
Gambino(RIP)
Gravano(RIP)
Savagery(RIP)

All but one of your bloods died, yet you call it a pretty nice version for your fam?

This is how omerta is supposed to be played my friend. You try saving your bloods but when your blood Aeterna is not blooded to for example gambino, then one of those families should not see the end. That's the difference between your pacts and alliances and their simple blooding.

really thats how this game should be played? Valueing one blood over the other, you're saying kissing Aerterna ass was more important then saving a blood. To finish the version perhaps you're right, but saying you had a nice version without saving 5 of your bloods, say a lot about your views on your bloods.

No it says more about your view on you bloods, they're not puppets that dance to what you say. Aeterna shot most of those bloods and Aeterna is a blood aswell. If I blood Faffie and I know Aeterna is alive, I know there is a very big chance Aeterna might be shooting me if I am not friendly with Aeterna.

Same way goes the other way around. Faffie had to shoot some of Aeterna bloods. Imagen if all bloods of the winners were alive because Faffie and Aeterna would've made deals about saving their bloods. Then this game would've ended with like 10+ families like those other noob pacts usualy do. There would've actually been no war left next to the opening war of the version.
So to summerize, Aeterna kept killing your bloods and you didnt do anything about because you were scared of them or valued them higher then the bloods they killed. I guess conflicts balls were bigger when they shot Coccada for that reason, you just looked the other way, well played :')

So to summarize you could perhaps read both paragraphs before summarizing stuff. But I can help you poor soul out if you want:
Maraz (Aeterna blood) shot Anarchy (Blood of both)
Gravano (Faffie blood) shot Aeterna and got countered on by Maraz and Aeterna.
Faffie shoots Maraz for A) Revenge for Anarchy and B) Not being directly related to Maraz.
Empire/Ferrante (Aeterna bloods) shoot Faffie so Faffie cleans them as much as possible.
Aeterna shoots Savagery (Faffie blood) because Aeterna and Savagery arent blooded so they must be cleaned.
Aeterna shoots Gambino/Alcatraz (Faffie bloods) for A) Gambino breaking the deal about finishing with 5 fams and making a sister and B) Not being bloods to Aeterna so breaking a deal = death.

It's not really a matter of valueing one blood over another, but should a family shoot their blood because of a fuckup of their other blood? I dont think so. Maybe Faffie and Aeterna should've tried to please the masses and not shoot eachothers bloods, guess which fams would be up right now? Aeterna, Lusa, Faffie, Marazzino, Savagery, Gambino, Alcatraz, Anarchy, Empire, Ferrante and Gravano. Add in the random sisterfams and asones and it would be 15 families. Would people be pleased? No, they would cry about pacting. So instead of just finding faults in everything be happy that it's over and try again tomorrow.

Empire/Ferrante (Aeterna bloods) *With Aeterna as backup, ready to shoot gambino if they jumped for Faffie* shoot Faffie so Faffie cleans them as much as possible.
You do realize Gambino jumped for Faffie, and Aeterna didn't shoot them, right? (They did shoot them a few weeks later, but that's a different story.)
Go get a brain, retard.
Anonymous (19:29:29 - 07-01)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 19:18:33 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 18:53:25 on 07/01:
Empire/Ferrante *with Aeterna as backup, ready to shoot gambino if they jumped for faffie (Aeterna bloods) shoot Faffie so Faffie cleans them as much as possible.



Anonymous at 15:50:37 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 15:25:54 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 14:08:29 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 13:32:04 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 09:07:20 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 06:00:53 on 07/01:
Papagoose at 23:30:45 on 06/01:
Although i must say it was a pretty nice version for our side (Faffie) a bit of balancing would be a great benefit for the game. Setting a maximum of possible fam members and slightly adjust of KS would greatly improve the gameplay and fun.
The chance that the massblooding (like in this version) will results in early winning will also be reduced by setting a max to fam members.

Thanks to all Faffie members for all their effort in this version and several versions before. I am proud to be part of it.

Greetings Papagoose _o_

Bloods:
Aeterna/Lusa
Alcatraz(RIP)
Anarchy(RIP)
Gambino(RIP)
Gravano(RIP)
Savagery(RIP)

All but one of your bloods died, yet you call it a pretty nice version for your fam?

This is how omerta is supposed to be played my friend. You try saving your bloods but when your blood Aeterna is not blooded to for example gambino, then one of those families should not see the end. That's the difference between your pacts and alliances and their simple blooding.

really thats how this game should be played? Valueing one blood over the other, you're saying kissing Aerterna ass was more important then saving a blood. To finish the version perhaps you're right, but saying you had a nice version without saving 5 of your bloods, say a lot about your views on your bloods.

No it says more about your view on you bloods, they're not puppets that dance to what you say. Aeterna shot most of those bloods and Aeterna is a blood aswell. If I blood Faffie and I know Aeterna is alive, I know there is a very big chance Aeterna might be shooting me if I am not friendly with Aeterna.

Same way goes the other way around. Faffie had to shoot some of Aeterna bloods. Imagen if all bloods of the winners were alive because Faffie and Aeterna would've made deals about saving their bloods. Then this game would've ended with like 10+ families like those other noob pacts usualy do. There would've actually been no war left next to the opening war of the version.
So to summerize, Aeterna kept killing your bloods and you didnt do anything about because you were scared of them or valued them higher then the bloods they killed. I guess conflicts balls were bigger when they shot Coccada for that reason, you just looked the other way, well played :')

So to summarize you could perhaps read both paragraphs before summarizing stuff. But I can help you poor soul out if you want:
Maraz (Aeterna blood) shot Anarchy (Blood of both)
Gravano (Faffie blood) shot Aeterna and got countered on by Maraz and Aeterna.
Faffie shoots Maraz for A) Revenge for Anarchy and B) Not being directly related to Maraz.
Empire/Ferrante (Aeterna bloods) shoot Faffie so Faffie cleans them as much as possible.
Aeterna shoots Savagery (Faffie blood) because Aeterna and Savagery arent blooded so they must be cleaned.
Aeterna shoots Gambino/Alcatraz (Faffie bloods) for A) Gambino breaking the deal about finishing with 5 fams and making a sister and B) Not being bloods to Aeterna so breaking a deal = death.

It's not really a matter of valueing one blood over another, but should a family shoot their blood because of a fuckup of their other blood? I dont think so. Maybe Faffie and Aeterna should've tried to please the masses and not shoot eachothers bloods, guess which fams would be up right now? Aeterna, Lusa, Faffie, Marazzino, Savagery, Gambino, Alcatraz, Anarchy, Empire, Ferrante and Gravano. Add in the random sisterfams and asones and it would be 15 families. Would people be pleased? No, they would cry about pacting. So instead of just finding faults in everything be happy that it's over and try again tomorrow.

Empire/Ferrante (Aeterna bloods) *With Aeterna as backup, ready to shoot gambino if they jumped for Faffie* shoot Faffie so Faffie cleans them as much as possible.
Aeterna were backup against their own blood? That's a bit low isn't it?

depends on who you are i guess, in the end they did not shoot anyways. really no harm done, and it was not like faffie needed Aeterna's help. But normally you would stay out of blood vs. blood :)
Anonymous (19:25:08 - 07-01)
Link Quote
there will be some new changes :)
Anonymous (19:18:33 - 07-01)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 18:53:25 on 07/01:
Empire/Ferrante *with Aeterna as backup, ready to shoot gambino if they jumped for faffie (Aeterna bloods) shoot Faffie so Faffie cleans them as much as possible.



Anonymous at 15:50:37 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 15:25:54 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 14:08:29 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 13:32:04 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 09:07:20 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 06:00:53 on 07/01:
Papagoose at 23:30:45 on 06/01:
Although i must say it was a pretty nice version for our side (Faffie) a bit of balancing would be a great benefit for the game. Setting a maximum of possible fam members and slightly adjust of KS would greatly improve the gameplay and fun.
The chance that the massblooding (like in this version) will results in early winning will also be reduced by setting a max to fam members.

Thanks to all Faffie members for all their effort in this version and several versions before. I am proud to be part of it.

Greetings Papagoose _o_

Bloods:
Aeterna/Lusa
Alcatraz(RIP)
Anarchy(RIP)
Gambino(RIP)
Gravano(RIP)
Savagery(RIP)

All but one of your bloods died, yet you call it a pretty nice version for your fam?

This is how omerta is supposed to be played my friend. You try saving your bloods but when your blood Aeterna is not blooded to for example gambino, then one of those families should not see the end. That's the difference between your pacts and alliances and their simple blooding.

really thats how this game should be played? Valueing one blood over the other, you're saying kissing Aerterna ass was more important then saving a blood. To finish the version perhaps you're right, but saying you had a nice version without saving 5 of your bloods, say a lot about your views on your bloods.

No it says more about your view on you bloods, they're not puppets that dance to what you say. Aeterna shot most of those bloods and Aeterna is a blood aswell. If I blood Faffie and I know Aeterna is alive, I know there is a very big chance Aeterna might be shooting me if I am not friendly with Aeterna.

Same way goes the other way around. Faffie had to shoot some of Aeterna bloods. Imagen if all bloods of the winners were alive because Faffie and Aeterna would've made deals about saving their bloods. Then this game would've ended with like 10+ families like those other noob pacts usualy do. There would've actually been no war left next to the opening war of the version.
So to summerize, Aeterna kept killing your bloods and you didnt do anything about because you were scared of them or valued them higher then the bloods they killed. I guess conflicts balls were bigger when they shot Coccada for that reason, you just looked the other way, well played :')

So to summarize you could perhaps read both paragraphs before summarizing stuff. But I can help you poor soul out if you want:
Maraz (Aeterna blood) shot Anarchy (Blood of both)
Gravano (Faffie blood) shot Aeterna and got countered on by Maraz and Aeterna.
Faffie shoots Maraz for A) Revenge for Anarchy and B) Not being directly related to Maraz.
Empire/Ferrante (Aeterna bloods) shoot Faffie so Faffie cleans them as much as possible.
Aeterna shoots Savagery (Faffie blood) because Aeterna and Savagery arent blooded so they must be cleaned.
Aeterna shoots Gambino/Alcatraz (Faffie bloods) for A) Gambino breaking the deal about finishing with 5 fams and making a sister and B) Not being bloods to Aeterna so breaking a deal = death.

It's not really a matter of valueing one blood over another, but should a family shoot their blood because of a fuckup of their other blood? I dont think so. Maybe Faffie and Aeterna should've tried to please the masses and not shoot eachothers bloods, guess which fams would be up right now? Aeterna, Lusa, Faffie, Marazzino, Savagery, Gambino, Alcatraz, Anarchy, Empire, Ferrante and Gravano. Add in the random sisterfams and asones and it would be 15 families. Would people be pleased? No, they would cry about pacting. So instead of just finding faults in everything be happy that it's over and try again tomorrow.

Empire/Ferrante (Aeterna bloods) *With Aeterna as backup, ready to shoot gambino if they jumped for Faffie* shoot Faffie so Faffie cleans them as much as possible.
Aeterna were backup against their own blood? That's a bit low isn't it?
Anonymous (18:53:25 - 07-01)
Link Quote
Empire/Ferrante *with Aeterna as backup, ready to shoot gambino if they jumped for faffie (Aeterna bloods) shoot Faffie so Faffie cleans them as much as possible.



Anonymous at 15:50:37 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 15:25:54 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 14:08:29 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 13:32:04 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 09:07:20 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 06:00:53 on 07/01:
Papagoose at 23:30:45 on 06/01:
Although i must say it was a pretty nice version for our side (Faffie) a bit of balancing would be a great benefit for the game. Setting a maximum of possible fam members and slightly adjust of KS would greatly improve the gameplay and fun.
The chance that the massblooding (like in this version) will results in early winning will also be reduced by setting a max to fam members.

Thanks to all Faffie members for all their effort in this version and several versions before. I am proud to be part of it.

Greetings Papagoose _o_

Bloods:
Aeterna/Lusa
Alcatraz(RIP)
Anarchy(RIP)
Gambino(RIP)
Gravano(RIP)
Savagery(RIP)

All but one of your bloods died, yet you call it a pretty nice version for your fam?

This is how omerta is supposed to be played my friend. You try saving your bloods but when your blood Aeterna is not blooded to for example gambino, then one of those families should not see the end. That's the difference between your pacts and alliances and their simple blooding.

really thats how this game should be played? Valueing one blood over the other, you're saying kissing Aerterna ass was more important then saving a blood. To finish the version perhaps you're right, but saying you had a nice version without saving 5 of your bloods, say a lot about your views on your bloods.

No it says more about your view on you bloods, they're not puppets that dance to what you say. Aeterna shot most of those bloods and Aeterna is a blood aswell. If I blood Faffie and I know Aeterna is alive, I know there is a very big chance Aeterna might be shooting me if I am not friendly with Aeterna.

Same way goes the other way around. Faffie had to shoot some of Aeterna bloods. Imagen if all bloods of the winners were alive because Faffie and Aeterna would've made deals about saving their bloods. Then this game would've ended with like 10+ families like those other noob pacts usualy do. There would've actually been no war left next to the opening war of the version.
So to summerize, Aeterna kept killing your bloods and you didnt do anything about because you were scared of them or valued them higher then the bloods they killed. I guess conflicts balls were bigger when they shot Coccada for that reason, you just looked the other way, well played :')

So to summarize you could perhaps read both paragraphs before summarizing stuff. But I can help you poor soul out if you want:
Maraz (Aeterna blood) shot Anarchy (Blood of both)
Gravano (Faffie blood) shot Aeterna and got countered on by Maraz and Aeterna.
Faffie shoots Maraz for A) Revenge for Anarchy and B) Not being directly related to Maraz.
Empire/Ferrante (Aeterna bloods) shoot Faffie so Faffie cleans them as much as possible.
Aeterna shoots Savagery (Faffie blood) because Aeterna and Savagery arent blooded so they must be cleaned.
Aeterna shoots Gambino/Alcatraz (Faffie bloods) for A) Gambino breaking the deal about finishing with 5 fams and making a sister and B) Not being bloods to Aeterna so breaking a deal = death.

It's not really a matter of valueing one blood over another, but should a family shoot their blood because of a fuckup of their other blood? I dont think so. Maybe Faffie and Aeterna should've tried to please the masses and not shoot eachothers bloods, guess which fams would be up right now? Aeterna, Lusa, Faffie, Marazzino, Savagery, Gambino, Alcatraz, Anarchy, Empire, Ferrante and Gravano. Add in the random sisterfams and asones and it would be 15 families. Would people be pleased? No, they would cry about pacting. So instead of just finding faults in everything be happy that it's over and try again tomorrow.

Empire/Ferrante (Aeterna bloods) *With Aeterna as backup, ready to shoot gambino if they jumped for Faffie* shoot Faffie so Faffie cleans them as much as possible.
Anonymous (17:26:51 - 07-01)
Link Quote
Next to that, if you value your blood evenly you have to leave issues between your bloods between your bloods.

If Faffie would shoot aeterna, they surely favoured bloods above other bloods. In other words: if bloods go to war you can't shoot one of them.

Your hate against Faffie is ridiculous.
Anonymous (15:53:16 - 07-01)
Link Quote
Anon fags
Anonymous (15:50:37 - 07-01)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 15:25:54 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 14:08:29 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 13:32:04 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 09:07:20 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 06:00:53 on 07/01:
Papagoose at 23:30:45 on 06/01:
Although i must say it was a pretty nice version for our side (Faffie) a bit of balancing would be a great benefit for the game. Setting a maximum of possible fam members and slightly adjust of KS would greatly improve the gameplay and fun.
The chance that the massblooding (like in this version) will results in early winning will also be reduced by setting a max to fam members.

Thanks to all Faffie members for all their effort in this version and several versions before. I am proud to be part of it.

Greetings Papagoose _o_

Bloods:
Aeterna/Lusa
Alcatraz(RIP)
Anarchy(RIP)
Gambino(RIP)
Gravano(RIP)
Savagery(RIP)

All but one of your bloods died, yet you call it a pretty nice version for your fam?

This is how omerta is supposed to be played my friend. You try saving your bloods but when your blood Aeterna is not blooded to for example gambino, then one of those families should not see the end. That's the difference between your pacts and alliances and their simple blooding.

really thats how this game should be played? Valueing one blood over the other, you're saying kissing Aerterna ass was more important then saving a blood. To finish the version perhaps you're right, but saying you had a nice version without saving 5 of your bloods, say a lot about your views on your bloods.

No it says more about your view on you bloods, they're not puppets that dance to what you say. Aeterna shot most of those bloods and Aeterna is a blood aswell. If I blood Faffie and I know Aeterna is alive, I know there is a very big chance Aeterna might be shooting me if I am not friendly with Aeterna.

Same way goes the other way around. Faffie had to shoot some of Aeterna bloods. Imagen if all bloods of the winners were alive because Faffie and Aeterna would've made deals about saving their bloods. Then this game would've ended with like 10+ families like those other noob pacts usualy do. There would've actually been no war left next to the opening war of the version.
So to summerize, Aeterna kept killing your bloods and you didnt do anything about because you were scared of them or valued them higher then the bloods they killed. I guess conflicts balls were bigger when they shot Coccada for that reason, you just looked the other way, well played :')

So to summarize you could perhaps read both paragraphs before summarizing stuff. But I can help you poor soul out if you want:
Maraz (Aeterna blood) shot Anarchy (Blood of both)
Gravano (Faffie blood) shot Aeterna and got countered on by Maraz and Aeterna.
Faffie shoots Maraz for A) Revenge for Anarchy and B) Not being directly related to Maraz.
Empire/Ferrante (Aeterna bloods) shoot Faffie so Faffie cleans them as much as possible.
Aeterna shoots Savagery (Faffie blood) because Aeterna and Savagery arent blooded so they must be cleaned.
Aeterna shoots Gambino/Alcatraz (Faffie bloods) for A) Gambino breaking the deal about finishing with 5 fams and making a sister and B) Not being bloods to Aeterna so breaking a deal = death.

It's not really a matter of valueing one blood over another, but should a family shoot their blood because of a fuckup of their other blood? I dont think so. Maybe Faffie and Aeterna should've tried to please the masses and not shoot eachothers bloods, guess which fams would be up right now? Aeterna, Lusa, Faffie, Marazzino, Savagery, Gambino, Alcatraz, Anarchy, Empire, Ferrante and Gravano. Add in the random sisterfams and asones and it would be 15 families. Would people be pleased? No, they would cry about pacting. So instead of just finding faults in everything be happy that it's over and try again tomorrow.
Anonymous (15:25:54 - 07-01)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 14:08:29 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 13:32:04 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 09:07:20 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 06:00:53 on 07/01:
Papagoose at 23:30:45 on 06/01:
Although i must say it was a pretty nice version for our side (Faffie) a bit of balancing would be a great benefit for the game. Setting a maximum of possible fam members and slightly adjust of KS would greatly improve the gameplay and fun.
The chance that the massblooding (like in this version) will results in early winning will also be reduced by setting a max to fam members.

Thanks to all Faffie members for all their effort in this version and several versions before. I am proud to be part of it.

Greetings Papagoose _o_

Bloods:
Aeterna/Lusa
Alcatraz(RIP)
Anarchy(RIP)
Gambino(RIP)
Gravano(RIP)
Savagery(RIP)

All but one of your bloods died, yet you call it a pretty nice version for your fam?

This is how omerta is supposed to be played my friend. You try saving your bloods but when your blood Aeterna is not blooded to for example gambino, then one of those families should not see the end. That's the difference between your pacts and alliances and their simple blooding.

really thats how this game should be played? Valueing one blood over the other, you're saying kissing Aerterna ass was more important then saving a blood. To finish the version perhaps you're right, but saying you had a nice version without saving 5 of your bloods, say a lot about your views on your bloods.

No it says more about your view on you bloods, they're not puppets that dance to what you say. Aeterna shot most of those bloods and Aeterna is a blood aswell. If I blood Faffie and I know Aeterna is alive, I know there is a very big chance Aeterna might be shooting me if I am not friendly with Aeterna.

Same way goes the other way around. Faffie had to shoot some of Aeterna bloods. Imagen if all bloods of the winners were alive because Faffie and Aeterna would've made deals about saving their bloods. Then this game would've ended with like 10+ families like those other noob pacts usualy do. There would've actually been no war left next to the opening war of the version.
So to summerize, Aeterna kept killing your bloods and you didnt do anything about because you were scared of them or valued them higher then the bloods they killed. I guess conflicts balls were bigger when they shot Coccada for that reason, you just looked the other way, well played :')
Anonymous (14:08:29 - 07-01)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 13:32:04 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 09:07:20 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 06:00:53 on 07/01:
Papagoose at 23:30:45 on 06/01:
Although i must say it was a pretty nice version for our side (Faffie) a bit of balancing would be a great benefit for the game. Setting a maximum of possible fam members and slightly adjust of KS would greatly improve the gameplay and fun.
The chance that the massblooding (like in this version) will results in early winning will also be reduced by setting a max to fam members.

Thanks to all Faffie members for all their effort in this version and several versions before. I am proud to be part of it.

Greetings Papagoose _o_

Bloods:
Aeterna/Lusa
Alcatraz(RIP)
Anarchy(RIP)
Gambino(RIP)
Gravano(RIP)
Savagery(RIP)

All but one of your bloods died, yet you call it a pretty nice version for your fam?

This is how omerta is supposed to be played my friend. You try saving your bloods but when your blood Aeterna is not blooded to for example gambino, then one of those families should not see the end. That's the difference between your pacts and alliances and their simple blooding.

really thats how this game should be played? Valueing one blood over the other, you're saying kissing Aerterna ass was more important then saving a blood. To finish the version perhaps you're right, but saying you had a nice version without saving 5 of your bloods, say a lot about your views on your bloods.

No it says more about your view on you bloods, they're not puppets that dance to what you say. Aeterna shot most of those bloods and Aeterna is a blood aswell. If I blood Faffie and I know Aeterna is alive, I know there is a very big chance Aeterna might be shooting me if I am not friendly with Aeterna.

Same way goes the other way around. Faffie had to shoot some of Aeterna bloods. Imagen if all bloods of the winners were alive because Faffie and Aeterna would've made deals about saving their bloods. Then this game would've ended with like 10+ families like those other noob pacts usualy do. There would've actually been no war left next to the opening war of the version.
Anonymous (13:32:04 - 07-01)
Link Quote
Anonymous at 09:07:20 on 07/01:
Anonymous at 06:00:53 on 07/01:
Papagoose at 23:30:45 on 06/01:
Although i must say it was a pretty nice version for our side (Faffie) a bit of balancing would be a great benefit for the game. Setting a maximum of possible fam members and slightly adjust of KS would greatly improve the gameplay and fun.
The chance that the massblooding (like in this version) will results in early winning will also be reduced by setting a max to fam members.

Thanks to all Faffie members for all their effort in this version and several versions before. I am proud to be part of it.

Greetings Papagoose _o_

Bloods:
Aeterna/Lusa
Alcatraz(RIP)
Anarchy(RIP)
Gambino(RIP)
Gravano(RIP)
Savagery(RIP)

All but one of your bloods died, yet you call it a pretty nice version for your fam?

This is how omerta is supposed to be played my friend. You try saving your bloods but when your blood Aeterna is not blooded to for example gambino, then one of those families should not see the end. That's the difference between your pacts and alliances and their simple blooding.

really thats how this game should be played? Valueing one blood over the other, you're saying kissing Aerterna ass was more important then saving a blood. To finish the version perhaps you're right, but saying you had a nice version without saving 5 of your bloods, say a lot about your views on your bloods.