» Menu
» OB/Site News
» Articles
![Sort by date (0-9) Date](/images/pic_icon-calendar.png)
![Sort by comments (0-9) Comments](/images/pic_icon-comments.png)
![Sort by rating (0-9) Rating](/images/pic_icon-star.png)
» Barafranca News
No news found. Reset in progress?
![]() |
|
article
It was a warm quiet october evening, there was only the sound of the occasional passing car or pedestrian. It had been quiet like this for the last few weeks in the cities of Omerta. Mainly because the families were busy organising their families due to the forced retirement of the leading syndicate. As the evening progressed more and more gangsters sought the comfort of their bed. That all changed soon after Midnight.
And here we have it. After just 3 weeks and 2 days Omerta has it's first big war. At first glance it seems to be Theogony, Monte Carlo & Lusa that are under fire.
There were alot of rumours floating around that something would go down on Sunday. The attackers obviously believed them as they decided to act the night before.
The attackers seem include; Gravano, Faffie, Impact, Anarchy+, Coccada & Koninkrijk
Will there be any counter attack?
Catania, Fidalitas & Marazzino have joined vs Gravano
During the next day both Lusa and Theogony fell to the force of the attack.
And here we have it. After just 3 weeks and 2 days Omerta has it's first big war. At first glance it seems to be Theogony, Monte Carlo & Lusa that are under fire.
There were alot of rumours floating around that something would go down on Sunday. The attackers obviously believed them as they decided to act the night before.
The attackers seem include; Gravano, Faffie, Impact, Anarchy+, Coccada & Koninkrijk
Will there be any counter attack?
Catania, Fidalitas & Marazzino have joined vs Gravano
During the next day both Lusa and Theogony fell to the force of the attack.
statistics
War started on: 00:23:00 06-10-2013 | War ended on: 15:42:02 06-10-2013 |
Bullet difference: -21,204,104 | War duration: 15h 19m |
Money difference: -$901,901,066 | Players died: 169 |
deaths
Dead Families:
Deaths per family:
|
|
damn (18:18:13 - 06-10)
johngotti at 14:17:01 on 06/10:
Koninkrijk do alot last version too...
Koninkrijk do alot last version too...
who the fuck is koninkrijk?
Anonymous (17:53:28 - 06-10)
Asabi at 17:51:05 on 06/10:
Konin rocks kankah !
johngotti at 14:17:01 on 06/10:
Koninkrijk do alot last version too...
Koninkrijk do alot last version too...
Konin rocks kankah !
johngotti at 14:17:01 on 06/10:
Koninkrijk do alot last version too...
Koninkrijk do alot last version too...
Konin rocks kankah !
Anonymous (17:41:49 - 06-10)
Anonymous at 15:46:32 on 06/10:
Gravano is doing this to themselves, by blooding all over the place.
Anonymous at 15:08:23 on 06/10:
Yes often only 1-3 families are being taken down at a time but in most of those wars there are backup families just in case the other 3-10 (however many families are on a 'side') that might jump in. So down to the whole basics, you still need to plan everything down to a whole side.
If you remember 2.1 well enough you'd also know one of the most fun wars in omerta history was the pretty much 1on1 ratio war of Lucchese vs Fatoslocos. Those wars were epic and good fun, even Garra from the losing side will tell you it was a great war to play. To already answer a question fron anyone in here: Yes, there were bloods back then, the biggest difference is also that when you'd seek a heist you'd have 10 people in your PM. The community has downscaled and so need pacts/bloodlists or even complete families that need to grow smaller.
In my oppinion this war doesn't look like GREAT fun, I haven't fought in this war but I do know it's bascily the same war I've seen the last couple of versions. Even Gravano is going down in the first war of the version 3 times in a row now, so bascily even the outcome is the same for some families.
I would've liked seeing some different families fight out 1on1 over some spot or casino.
questionmark at 13:00:22 on 06/10:
Well, not sure what u guys want? I mean if ppl did make bloods and sides, their would be all against all. This has allways existed in omerta, at least since 2.1 when i started. And i would rather call it smart, not too attack the hole other "side" but rather too pick a few fams of the side.
Well, not sure what u guys want? I mean if ppl did make bloods and sides, their would be all against all. This has allways existed in omerta, at least since 2.1 when i started. And i would rather call it smart, not too attack the hole other "side" but rather too pick a few fams of the side.
Yes often only 1-3 families are being taken down at a time but in most of those wars there are backup families just in case the other 3-10 (however many families are on a 'side') that might jump in. So down to the whole basics, you still need to plan everything down to a whole side.
If you remember 2.1 well enough you'd also know one of the most fun wars in omerta history was the pretty much 1on1 ratio war of Lucchese vs Fatoslocos. Those wars were epic and good fun, even Garra from the losing side will tell you it was a great war to play. To already answer a question fron anyone in here: Yes, there were bloods back then, the biggest difference is also that when you'd seek a heist you'd have 10 people in your PM. The community has downscaled and so need pacts/bloodlists or even complete families that need to grow smaller.
In my oppinion this war doesn't look like GREAT fun, I haven't fought in this war but I do know it's bascily the same war I've seen the last couple of versions. Even Gravano is going down in the first war of the version 3 times in a row now, so bascily even the outcome is the same for some families.
I would've liked seeing some different families fight out 1on1 over some spot or casino.
Gravano is doing this to themselves, by blooding all over the place.
so if gravano would not blood so many fams according to your words then they would not be shoot in first war of the versy ? cmon its a bulshit xD
Anonymous (15:46:32 - 06-10)
Anonymous at 15:08:23 on 06/10:
Yes often only 1-3 families are being taken down at a time but in most of those wars there are backup families just in case the other 3-10 (however many families are on a 'side') that might jump in. So down to the whole basics, you still need to plan everything down to a whole side.
If you remember 2.1 well enough you'd also know one of the most fun wars in omerta history was the pretty much 1on1 ratio war of Lucchese vs Fatoslocos. Those wars were epic and good fun, even Garra from the losing side will tell you it was a great war to play. To already answer a question fron anyone in here: Yes, there were bloods back then, the biggest difference is also that when you'd seek a heist you'd have 10 people in your PM. The community has downscaled and so need pacts/bloodlists or even complete families that need to grow smaller.
In my oppinion this war doesn't look like GREAT fun, I haven't fought in this war but I do know it's bascily the same war I've seen the last couple of versions. Even Gravano is going down in the first war of the version 3 times in a row now, so bascily even the outcome is the same for some families.
I would've liked seeing some different families fight out 1on1 over some spot or casino.
questionmark at 13:00:22 on 06/10:
Well, not sure what u guys want? I mean if ppl did make bloods and sides, their would be all against all. This has allways existed in omerta, at least since 2.1 when i started. And i would rather call it smart, not too attack the hole other "side" but rather too pick a few fams of the side.
Well, not sure what u guys want? I mean if ppl did make bloods and sides, their would be all against all. This has allways existed in omerta, at least since 2.1 when i started. And i would rather call it smart, not too attack the hole other "side" but rather too pick a few fams of the side.
Yes often only 1-3 families are being taken down at a time but in most of those wars there are backup families just in case the other 3-10 (however many families are on a 'side') that might jump in. So down to the whole basics, you still need to plan everything down to a whole side.
If you remember 2.1 well enough you'd also know one of the most fun wars in omerta history was the pretty much 1on1 ratio war of Lucchese vs Fatoslocos. Those wars were epic and good fun, even Garra from the losing side will tell you it was a great war to play. To already answer a question fron anyone in here: Yes, there were bloods back then, the biggest difference is also that when you'd seek a heist you'd have 10 people in your PM. The community has downscaled and so need pacts/bloodlists or even complete families that need to grow smaller.
In my oppinion this war doesn't look like GREAT fun, I haven't fought in this war but I do know it's bascily the same war I've seen the last couple of versions. Even Gravano is going down in the first war of the version 3 times in a row now, so bascily even the outcome is the same for some families.
I would've liked seeing some different families fight out 1on1 over some spot or casino.
Gravano is doing this to themselves, by blooding all over the place.
Anonymous (15:08:23 - 06-10)
questionmark at 13:00:22 on 06/10:
Well, not sure what u guys want? I mean if ppl did make bloods and sides, their would be all against all. This has allways existed in omerta, at least since 2.1 when i started. And i would rather call it smart, not too attack the hole other "side" but rather too pick a few fams of the side.
Well, not sure what u guys want? I mean if ppl did make bloods and sides, their would be all against all. This has allways existed in omerta, at least since 2.1 when i started. And i would rather call it smart, not too attack the hole other "side" but rather too pick a few fams of the side.
Yes often only 1-3 families are being taken down at a time but in most of those wars there are backup families just in case the other 3-10 (however many families are on a 'side') that might jump in. So down to the whole basics, you still need to plan everything down to a whole side.
If you remember 2.1 well enough you'd also know one of the most fun wars in omerta history was the pretty much 1on1 ratio war of Lucchese vs Fatoslocos. Those wars were epic and good fun, even Garra from the losing side will tell you it was a great war to play. To already answer a question fron anyone in here: Yes, there were bloods back then, the biggest difference is also that when you'd seek a heist you'd have 10 people in your PM. The community has downscaled and so need pacts/bloodlists or even complete families that need to grow smaller.
In my oppinion this war doesn't look like GREAT fun, I haven't fought in this war but I do know it's bascily the same war I've seen the last couple of versions. Even Gravano is going down in the first war of the version 3 times in a row now, so bascily even the outcome is the same for some families.
I would've liked seeing some different families fight out 1on1 over some spot or casino.
Anonymous (14:09:00 - 06-10)
Anonymous at 10:54:04 on 06/10:
"The attackers seem include; Gravano, Faffie, Impact, Anarchy, Coccada & Koninkrijk"
vs Theogony, MC & Lusa
Brave attack, 6 vs 3 small families
It's really the attitude of the players that fuck up this game.
Let's all pack and have peace all through the rest of the version!
"The attackers seem include; Gravano, Faffie, Impact, Anarchy, Coccada & Koninkrijk"
vs Theogony, MC & Lusa
Brave attack, 6 vs 3 small families
It's really the attitude of the players that fuck up this game.
Let's all pack and have peace all through the rest of the version!
well players decide to shoot first it was better from geting raped by marazzino,fidelitas,theogony,lusa,catania,monte carlo, capitalis,navolli,provenzano
Anonymous (13:49:08 - 06-10)
Anonymous at 11:21:58 on 06/10:
Totally agree. But that's something the players need to change.
Anonymous at 11:16:51 on 06/10:
I ofcourse ment a 10 man family, not 110
Anonymous at 11:14:55 on 06/10:
I've seen worse ratios trough the past couple of versions but it remains the problem of modern omerta. In my oppinion even just blooding is killing the game because even reasonably small bloodlists can form some side. For example if I would have a 110 man family and attack one family with MORE members (for example penta, maraz, Faffie or catania), I would still get counterd by like 3 families eventho I'd be so small. What I am trying to say is even bloodlists are a threat since you basicly got to plan on their bloods too. Since those bloods also have bloods, you basicly make 1 war versions, in which first war outcome crucial for who is going to win the version.
Imagen this game without bloods, that would be sick :D
Anonymous at 10:54:04 on 06/10:
"The attackers seem include; Gravano, Faffie, Impact, Anarchy, Coccada & Koninkrijk"
vs Theogony, MC & Lusa
Brave attack, 6 vs 3 small families
It's really the attitude of the players that fuck up this game.
Let's all pack and have peace all through the rest of the version!
"The attackers seem include; Gravano, Faffie, Impact, Anarchy, Coccada & Koninkrijk"
vs Theogony, MC & Lusa
Brave attack, 6 vs 3 small families
It's really the attitude of the players that fuck up this game.
Let's all pack and have peace all through the rest of the version!
I've seen worse ratios trough the past couple of versions but it remains the problem of modern omerta. In my oppinion even just blooding is killing the game because even reasonably small bloodlists can form some side. For example if I would have a 110 man family and attack one family with MORE members (for example penta, maraz, Faffie or catania), I would still get counterd by like 3 families eventho I'd be so small. What I am trying to say is even bloodlists are a threat since you basicly got to plan on their bloods too. Since those bloods also have bloods, you basicly make 1 war versions, in which first war outcome crucial for who is going to win the version.
Imagen this game without bloods, that would be sick :D
I ofcourse ment a 10 man family, not 110
Totally agree. But that's something the players need to change.
Yeah like more active players would be nice for example...
questionmark (13:00:22 - 06-10)
Well, not sure what u guys want? I mean if ppl did make bloods and sides, their would be all against all. This has allways existed in omerta, at least since 2.1 when i started. And i would rather call it smart, not too attack the hole other "side" but rather too pick a few fams of the side.
Anonymous (11:21:58 - 06-10)
Anonymous at 11:16:51 on 06/10:
I ofcourse ment a 10 man family, not 110
Anonymous at 11:14:55 on 06/10:
I've seen worse ratios trough the past couple of versions but it remains the problem of modern omerta. In my oppinion even just blooding is killing the game because even reasonably small bloodlists can form some side. For example if I would have a 110 man family and attack one family with MORE members (for example penta, maraz, Faffie or catania), I would still get counterd by like 3 families eventho I'd be so small. What I am trying to say is even bloodlists are a threat since you basicly got to plan on their bloods too. Since those bloods also have bloods, you basicly make 1 war versions, in which first war outcome crucial for who is going to win the version.
Imagen this game without bloods, that would be sick :D
Anonymous at 10:54:04 on 06/10:
"The attackers seem include; Gravano, Faffie, Impact, Anarchy, Coccada & Koninkrijk"
vs Theogony, MC & Lusa
Brave attack, 6 vs 3 small families
It's really the attitude of the players that fuck up this game.
Let's all pack and have peace all through the rest of the version!
"The attackers seem include; Gravano, Faffie, Impact, Anarchy, Coccada & Koninkrijk"
vs Theogony, MC & Lusa
Brave attack, 6 vs 3 small families
It's really the attitude of the players that fuck up this game.
Let's all pack and have peace all through the rest of the version!
I've seen worse ratios trough the past couple of versions but it remains the problem of modern omerta. In my oppinion even just blooding is killing the game because even reasonably small bloodlists can form some side. For example if I would have a 110 man family and attack one family with MORE members (for example penta, maraz, Faffie or catania), I would still get counterd by like 3 families eventho I'd be so small. What I am trying to say is even bloodlists are a threat since you basicly got to plan on their bloods too. Since those bloods also have bloods, you basicly make 1 war versions, in which first war outcome crucial for who is going to win the version.
Imagen this game without bloods, that would be sick :D
I ofcourse ment a 10 man family, not 110
Totally agree. But that's something the players need to change.
Anonymous (11:20:19 - 06-10)
Anonymous at 11:15:47 on 06/10:
another idiot who thinks he's funny.
Anonymous at 11:14:14 on 06/10:
ah, another idiot who has never heard of sarcasm.
Anonymous at 11:07:55 on 06/10:
Lets all have PEACE what a plonker u really are!! we all play this game to shoot every fucker who walks, if we had peace where is the fun u twirp!!!
Anonymous at 10:54:04 on 06/10:
"The attackers seem include; Gravano, Faffie, Impact, Anarchy, Coccada & Koninkrijk"
vs Theogony, MC & Lusa
Brave attack, 6 vs 3 small families
It's really the attitude of the players that fuck up this game.
Let's all pack and have peace all through the rest of the version!
"The attackers seem include; Gravano, Faffie, Impact, Anarchy, Coccada & Koninkrijk"
vs Theogony, MC & Lusa
Brave attack, 6 vs 3 small families
It's really the attitude of the players that fuck up this game.
Let's all pack and have peace all through the rest of the version!
Lets all have PEACE what a plonker u really are!! we all play this game to shoot every fucker who walks, if we had peace where is the fun u twirp!!!
ah, another idiot who has never heard of sarcasm.
another idiot who thinks he's funny.
I'm stunned by your comeback :| awesome.
Anonymous (11:16:51 - 06-10)
Anonymous at 11:14:55 on 06/10:
I've seen worse ratios trough the past couple of versions but it remains the problem of modern omerta. In my oppinion even just blooding is killing the game because even reasonably small bloodlists can form some side. For example if I would have a 110 man family and attack one family with MORE members (for example penta, maraz, Faffie or catania), I would still get counterd by like 3 families eventho I'd be so small. What I am trying to say is even bloodlists are a threat since you basicly got to plan on their bloods too. Since those bloods also have bloods, you basicly make 1 war versions, in which first war outcome crucial for who is going to win the version.
Imagen this game without bloods, that would be sick :D
Anonymous at 10:54:04 on 06/10:
"The attackers seem include; Gravano, Faffie, Impact, Anarchy, Coccada & Koninkrijk"
vs Theogony, MC & Lusa
Brave attack, 6 vs 3 small families
It's really the attitude of the players that fuck up this game.
Let's all pack and have peace all through the rest of the version!
"The attackers seem include; Gravano, Faffie, Impact, Anarchy, Coccada & Koninkrijk"
vs Theogony, MC & Lusa
Brave attack, 6 vs 3 small families
It's really the attitude of the players that fuck up this game.
Let's all pack and have peace all through the rest of the version!
I've seen worse ratios trough the past couple of versions but it remains the problem of modern omerta. In my oppinion even just blooding is killing the game because even reasonably small bloodlists can form some side. For example if I would have a 110 man family and attack one family with MORE members (for example penta, maraz, Faffie or catania), I would still get counterd by like 3 families eventho I'd be so small. What I am trying to say is even bloodlists are a threat since you basicly got to plan on their bloods too. Since those bloods also have bloods, you basicly make 1 war versions, in which first war outcome crucial for who is going to win the version.
Imagen this game without bloods, that would be sick :D
I ofcourse ment a 10 man family, not 110
Anonymous (11:15:47 - 06-10)
Anonymous at 11:14:14 on 06/10:
ah, another idiot who has never heard of sarcasm.
Anonymous at 11:07:55 on 06/10:
Lets all have PEACE what a plonker u really are!! we all play this game to shoot every fucker who walks, if we had peace where is the fun u twirp!!!
Anonymous at 10:54:04 on 06/10:
"The attackers seem include; Gravano, Faffie, Impact, Anarchy, Coccada & Koninkrijk"
vs Theogony, MC & Lusa
Brave attack, 6 vs 3 small families
It's really the attitude of the players that fuck up this game.
Let's all pack and have peace all through the rest of the version!
"The attackers seem include; Gravano, Faffie, Impact, Anarchy, Coccada & Koninkrijk"
vs Theogony, MC & Lusa
Brave attack, 6 vs 3 small families
It's really the attitude of the players that fuck up this game.
Let's all pack and have peace all through the rest of the version!
Lets all have PEACE what a plonker u really are!! we all play this game to shoot every fucker who walks, if we had peace where is the fun u twirp!!!
ah, another idiot who has never heard of sarcasm.
another idiot who thinks he's funny.
Anonymous (11:14:55 - 06-10)
Anonymous at 10:54:04 on 06/10:
"The attackers seem include; Gravano, Faffie, Impact, Anarchy, Coccada & Koninkrijk"
vs Theogony, MC & Lusa
Brave attack, 6 vs 3 small families
It's really the attitude of the players that fuck up this game.
Let's all pack and have peace all through the rest of the version!
"The attackers seem include; Gravano, Faffie, Impact, Anarchy, Coccada & Koninkrijk"
vs Theogony, MC & Lusa
Brave attack, 6 vs 3 small families
It's really the attitude of the players that fuck up this game.
Let's all pack and have peace all through the rest of the version!
I've seen worse ratios trough the past couple of versions but it remains the problem of modern omerta. In my oppinion even just blooding is killing the game because even reasonably small bloodlists can form some side. For example if I would have a 110 man family and attack one family with MORE members (for example penta, maraz, Faffie or catania), I would still get counterd by like 3 families eventho I'd be so small. What I am trying to say is even bloodlists are a threat since you basicly got to plan on their bloods too. Since those bloods also have bloods, you basicly make 1 war versions, in which first war outcome crucial for who is going to win the version.
Imagen this game without bloods, that would be sick :D
Anonymous (11:14:14 - 06-10)
Anonymous at 11:07:55 on 06/10:
Lets all have PEACE what a plonker u really are!! we all play this game to shoot every fucker who walks, if we had peace where is the fun u twirp!!!
Anonymous at 10:54:04 on 06/10:
"The attackers seem include; Gravano, Faffie, Impact, Anarchy, Coccada & Koninkrijk"
vs Theogony, MC & Lusa
Brave attack, 6 vs 3 small families
It's really the attitude of the players that fuck up this game.
Let's all pack and have peace all through the rest of the version!
"The attackers seem include; Gravano, Faffie, Impact, Anarchy, Coccada & Koninkrijk"
vs Theogony, MC & Lusa
Brave attack, 6 vs 3 small families
It's really the attitude of the players that fuck up this game.
Let's all pack and have peace all through the rest of the version!
Lets all have PEACE what a plonker u really are!! we all play this game to shoot every fucker who walks, if we had peace where is the fun u twirp!!!
ah, another idiot who has never heard of sarcasm.