» Menu
» OB/Site News
» Articles
» Barafranca News
No news found. Reset in progress?
 |
|
article
Empusa+ and Gambino are currently shooting Siberia which clearly looks to be unfinished business.
Few moments later Empusa started firing at Colossal as well.
Lionsgate also threw in some shots at siberia.
Odds after counter:
Bruglione 0.83:1
Chief 0.86:1
Bosphorus started their counter vs Empusa
Few moments later Empusa started firing at Colossal as well.
Lionsgate also threw in some shots at siberia.
Odds after counter:
Bruglione 0.83:1
Chief 0.86:1
Bosphorus started their counter vs Empusa
statements
Schopenhauer (Top Gambino): Revenge, the sweetest morsel to the mouth that ever was cooked in hell.
statistics
| War started on: 18:13:04 04-02-2016 | War ended on: 21:33:03 05-02-2016 |
| Bullet difference: -8,255,568 | War duration: 1d 3h 19m |
| Money difference: +$13,429,618 | Players died: 149 |
deaths
Dead Families:
Deaths per family:
|
|
0
Anonymous (00:18:52 - 05-02)
MurderInc at 00:05:23 on 05/02:
Seriously, these discussions are pointless. None of you morons should be surprised when no one bothers to write or update articles with all the useless complaints you throw at reporters.
My statements aren't contradicting each other: The war was an outlier, and any measure in isolation is not meaningful. That doesn't mean it's not worth mentioning, as long as the numbers are accurate (which they are to our knowledge). The interpretation is up to the reader.
I'm ending this discussion, if you have any issue with the accuracy of any numbers contact a reporter directly. Further comments will be deleted.
Anonymous at 23:34:57 on 04/02:
if you take into account what you just said "odds alone generally doesn't paint a complete picture of any war". its kinda funny your comeback is now that the odds where so huge that it was worth a mention. following that logic this war shouldnt show odds at all cause it isnt an "outliner" in the odds of the highranks way.
as you quite clearly stated "not all the members shoot" so then calling a 5:1 and 7.5:1 odd on that war really doesnt apply anymore as not every brug and chief in those fams prolly shot making those odds drop down way more, the just the number of high ranks in a fam.
so my point is consistency from your (personal) part in your replies as at one point you state that odds alone arent rly a figure to look upon just on its own, and then use an example from a previous war to state exactly the opposite of what you said.
as regarding to your mention of highranks dying those in general tell you alot more then just the number of deaths spread of the ranks. and give a nice overview in general of the dmg done to a family in the example above (having followed the war real time) you can quite clearly see by the number of deaths that empusa did not so much dmg to either siberia, as the countering fams did to empusa. in numbers of high ranks killed.
MurderInc at 23:18:56 on 04/02:
That war was quite the outlier in that it was 6v1 with a 5:1 brug and 7.5:1 chief ratio. We also include deaths per family and deaths on the attacking and defending side. Those numbers aren't worth anything in isolation either, and we still include them. What's your issue? Use your brain while interpreting them and stop complaining about non-issues, or just don't read this site.
Anonymous at 23:09:36 on 04/02:
Yet you (OB writers) add them and only started doing it in the vinci war
* starts to wonder about that
MurderInc at 22:16:49 on 04/02:
Just looking at odds alone generally doesn't paint a complete picture of any war, even with all counters accounted for. It's a useful measure, but in most wars, not everyone is shooting everyone, and the individual ratios of fights between families involved can differ quite significantly from the overall ratio. It's also a lot of effort to keep track off, so we generally don't do that.
Anonymous at 21:32:20 on 04/02:
I don't think the ratio of the initial attack is important as most warplans do keep a counter of the bloods in mind. An update of this would give a way better view of what's going on in such war. The initial numbers would only confuse people and would only seem like an excuse in case you lose a war.
The odds were uprdated by soomeone though so that's cool.
Steffi at 21:17:40 on 04/02:
so you dont thik the initial attack is worth to mention in such a article ?? whom ever you are..
i think it has a very valid reason to be there
Anonymous at 21:08:13 on 04/02:
Nope tjey will never do it cause all the reporters here belongs to gayberia any they want :) they are allways right :P
Anonymous at 21:02:08 on 04/02:
You might as well remove that odds statistic now the counter has begun.
You might as well remove that odds statistic now the counter has begun.
Nope tjey will never do it cause all the reporters here belongs to gayberia any they want :) they are allways right :P
so you dont thik the initial attack is worth to mention in such a article ?? whom ever you are..
i think it has a very valid reason to be there
I don't think the ratio of the initial attack is important as most warplans do keep a counter of the bloods in mind. An update of this would give a way better view of what's going on in such war. The initial numbers would only confuse people and would only seem like an excuse in case you lose a war.
The odds were uprdated by soomeone though so that's cool.
Yet you (OB writers) add them and only started doing it in the vinci war
* starts to wonder about that
if you take into account what you just said "odds alone generally doesn't paint a complete picture of any war". its kinda funny your comeback is now that the odds where so huge that it was worth a mention. following that logic this war shouldnt show odds at all cause it isnt an "outliner" in the odds of the highranks way.
as you quite clearly stated "not all the members shoot" so then calling a 5:1 and 7.5:1 odd on that war really doesnt apply anymore as not every brug and chief in those fams prolly shot making those odds drop down way more, the just the number of high ranks in a fam.
so my point is consistency from your (personal) part in your replies as at one point you state that odds alone arent rly a figure to look upon just on its own, and then use an example from a previous war to state exactly the opposite of what you said.
as regarding to your mention of highranks dying those in general tell you alot more then just the number of deaths spread of the ranks. and give a nice overview in general of the dmg done to a family in the example above (having followed the war real time) you can quite clearly see by the number of deaths that empusa did not so much dmg to either siberia, as the countering fams did to empusa. in numbers of high ranks killed.
My statements aren't contradicting each other: The war was an outlier, and any measure in isolation is not meaningful. That doesn't mean it's not worth mentioning, as long as the numbers are accurate (which they are to our knowledge). The interpretation is up to the reader.
I'm ending this discussion, if you have any issue with the accuracy of any numbers contact a reporter directly. Further comments will be deleted.
Whats wrong murderinc cant take anymore?
Your statements are contradicting very much so, and as someone state out below me. no "odds" where not added previous version when siberia was hitting with high attack to defence odds. no "odds" added when Tattaglia got hit by anarchy just before the vinci war. even though anarchy at that point had roughly 60+ lc+
And instead of actually going into this clear biased from reporters on this site "your shutting it down" but am glad you are cause now atleast your showing that all the shit you are getting ingame and here is founded. so thank you for that.
Oh and sure it is worth mentioning just like everything posted above and by others is also worth mentioning but your taking a discussion based around the ethics of which this site is using regarding reporting and taking it from the public domain into a private one, which is cool. but it shows that there is a measure of thruth to what is being said.
In the words of tyrrian lanister of game of thrones "silencing me doesnt prove me wrong, it only proves you have something to hide." and right now it seems there are things being said your rather not come out. if this wasnt true you wouldnt "thread" to use your powers as a moderator on this site to shut something down.
and as said in my previous posts it isnt about the outright numbers those are right. but as said "not everybody in the attacking families shot, so those numbres would be way lower if you factor that in" how nice of you to talk straight over that point being made.
In general people try to talk over points to which the have no defence and are true, so Murderinc stop hiding show some backbone and lets keep going shall we?
Anonymous at 00:15:32 on 05/02:
sssst your dead, how did u do?
MurderInc at 00:13:21 on 05/02:
In other news, Gambino education:
Daryl 05-Feb @ 00:08:31 Daryl totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Daryl
Maryjane 05-Feb @ 00:06:28 Maryjane totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Maryjane
Mu 05-Feb @ 00:00:17 Mu totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Mu
Glitterfart 04-Feb @ 23:57:05 Glitterfart totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Glitterfart
Shine 04-Feb @ 23:50:33 Shine totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Shine
Icecold 04-Feb @ 23:41:34 Icecold totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Icecold
Parcival 04-Feb @ 23:31:15 Parcival totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Parcival
That's how you use your don, top 3 and capos!
In other news, Gambino education:
Daryl 05-Feb @ 00:08:31 Daryl totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Daryl
Maryjane 05-Feb @ 00:06:28 Maryjane totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Maryjane
Mu 05-Feb @ 00:00:17 Mu totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Mu
Glitterfart 04-Feb @ 23:57:05 Glitterfart totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Glitterfart
Shine 04-Feb @ 23:50:33 Shine totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Shine
Icecold 04-Feb @ 23:41:34 Icecold totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Icecold
Parcival 04-Feb @ 23:31:15 Parcival totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Parcival
That's how you use your don, top 3 and capos!
sssst your dead, how did u do?
MurderInc at 00:13:21 on 05/02:
In other news, Gambino education:
Daryl 05-Feb @ 00:08:31 Daryl totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Daryl
Maryjane 05-Feb @ 00:06:28 Maryjane totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Maryjane
Mu 05-Feb @ 00:00:17 Mu totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Mu
Glitterfart 04-Feb @ 23:57:05 Glitterfart totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Glitterfart
Shine 04-Feb @ 23:50:33 Shine totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Shine
Icecold 04-Feb @ 23:41:34 Icecold totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Icecold
Parcival 04-Feb @ 23:31:15 Parcival totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Parcival
That's how you use your don, top 3 and capos!
In other news, Gambino education:
Daryl 05-Feb @ 00:08:31 Daryl totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Daryl
Maryjane 05-Feb @ 00:06:28 Maryjane totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Maryjane
Mu 05-Feb @ 00:00:17 Mu totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Mu
Glitterfart 04-Feb @ 23:57:05 Glitterfart totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Glitterfart
Shine 04-Feb @ 23:50:33 Shine totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Shine
Icecold 04-Feb @ 23:41:34 Icecold totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Icecold
Parcival 04-Feb @ 23:31:15 Parcival totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Parcival
That's how you use your don, top 3 and capos!
gaybino education?
Anonymous (00:15:32 - 05-02)
MurderInc at 00:13:21 on 05/02:
In other news, Gambino education:
Daryl 05-Feb @ 00:08:31 Daryl totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Daryl
Maryjane 05-Feb @ 00:06:28 Maryjane totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Maryjane
Mu 05-Feb @ 00:00:17 Mu totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Mu
Glitterfart 04-Feb @ 23:57:05 Glitterfart totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Glitterfart
Shine 04-Feb @ 23:50:33 Shine totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Shine
Icecold 04-Feb @ 23:41:34 Icecold totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Icecold
Parcival 04-Feb @ 23:31:15 Parcival totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Parcival
That's how you use your don, top 3 and capos!
In other news, Gambino education:
Daryl 05-Feb @ 00:08:31 Daryl totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Daryl
Maryjane 05-Feb @ 00:06:28 Maryjane totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Maryjane
Mu 05-Feb @ 00:00:17 Mu totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Mu
Glitterfart 04-Feb @ 23:57:05 Glitterfart totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Glitterfart
Shine 04-Feb @ 23:50:33 Shine totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Shine
Icecold 04-Feb @ 23:41:34 Icecold totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Icecold
Parcival 04-Feb @ 23:31:15 Parcival totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Parcival
That's how you use your don, top 3 and capos!
sssst your dead, how did u do?
In other news, Gambino education:
Daryl 05-Feb @ 00:08:31 Daryl totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Daryl
Maryjane 05-Feb @ 00:06:28 Maryjane totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Maryjane
Mu 05-Feb @ 00:00:17 Mu totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Mu
Glitterfart 04-Feb @ 23:57:05 Glitterfart totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Glitterfart
Shine 04-Feb @ 23:50:33 Shine totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Shine
Icecold 04-Feb @ 23:41:34 Icecold totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Icecold
Parcival 04-Feb @ 23:31:15 Parcival totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Parcival
That's how you use your don, top 3 and capos!
Daryl 05-Feb @ 00:08:31 Daryl totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Daryl
Maryjane 05-Feb @ 00:06:28 Maryjane totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Maryjane
Mu 05-Feb @ 00:00:17 Mu totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Mu
Glitterfart 04-Feb @ 23:57:05 Glitterfart totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Glitterfart
Shine 04-Feb @ 23:50:33 Shine totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Shine
Icecold 04-Feb @ 23:41:34 Icecold totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Icecold
Parcival 04-Feb @ 23:31:15 Parcival totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Parcival
That's how you use your don, top 3 and capos!
Anonymous (00:10:52 - 05-02)
prophecy shooting empusa.. 'ok'
Anonymous at 23:34:57 on 04/02:
if you take into account what you just said "odds alone generally doesn't paint a complete picture of any war". its kinda funny your comeback is now that the odds where so huge that it was worth a mention. following that logic this war shouldnt show odds at all cause it isnt an "outliner" in the odds of the highranks way.
as you quite clearly stated "not all the members shoot" so then calling a 5:1 and 7.5:1 odd on that war really doesnt apply anymore as not every brug and chief in those fams prolly shot making those odds drop down way more, the just the number of high ranks in a fam.
so my point is consistency from your (personal) part in your replies as at one point you state that odds alone arent rly a figure to look upon just on its own, and then use an example from a previous war to state exactly the opposite of what you said.
as regarding to your mention of highranks dying those in general tell you alot more then just the number of deaths spread of the ranks. and give a nice overview in general of the dmg done to a family in the example above (having followed the war real time) you can quite clearly see by the number of deaths that empusa did not so much dmg to either siberia, as the countering fams did to empusa. in numbers of high ranks killed.
MurderInc at 23:18:56 on 04/02:
That war was quite the outlier in that it was 6v1 with a 5:1 brug and 7.5:1 chief ratio. We also include deaths per family and deaths on the attacking and defending side. Those numbers aren't worth anything in isolation either, and we still include them. What's your issue? Use your brain while interpreting them and stop complaining about non-issues, or just don't read this site.
Anonymous at 23:09:36 on 04/02:
Yet you (OB writers) add them and only started doing it in the vinci war
* starts to wonder about that
MurderInc at 22:16:49 on 04/02:
Just looking at odds alone generally doesn't paint a complete picture of any war, even with all counters accounted for. It's a useful measure, but in most wars, not everyone is shooting everyone, and the individual ratios of fights between families involved can differ quite significantly from the overall ratio. It's also a lot of effort to keep track off, so we generally don't do that.
Anonymous at 21:32:20 on 04/02:
I don't think the ratio of the initial attack is important as most warplans do keep a counter of the bloods in mind. An update of this would give a way better view of what's going on in such war. The initial numbers would only confuse people and would only seem like an excuse in case you lose a war.
The odds were uprdated by soomeone though so that's cool.
Steffi at 21:17:40 on 04/02:
so you dont thik the initial attack is worth to mention in such a article ?? whom ever you are..
i think it has a very valid reason to be there
Anonymous at 21:08:13 on 04/02:
Nope tjey will never do it cause all the reporters here belongs to gayberia any they want :) they are allways right :P
Anonymous at 21:02:08 on 04/02:
You might as well remove that odds statistic now the counter has begun.
You might as well remove that odds statistic now the counter has begun.
Nope tjey will never do it cause all the reporters here belongs to gayberia any they want :) they are allways right :P
so you dont thik the initial attack is worth to mention in such a article ?? whom ever you are..
i think it has a very valid reason to be there
I don't think the ratio of the initial attack is important as most warplans do keep a counter of the bloods in mind. An update of this would give a way better view of what's going on in such war. The initial numbers would only confuse people and would only seem like an excuse in case you lose a war.
The odds were uprdated by soomeone though so that's cool.
Yet you (OB writers) add them and only started doing it in the vinci war
* starts to wonder about that
if you take into account what you just said "odds alone generally doesn't paint a complete picture of any war". its kinda funny your comeback is now that the odds where so huge that it was worth a mention. following that logic this war shouldnt show odds at all cause it isnt an "outliner" in the odds of the highranks way.
as you quite clearly stated "not all the members shoot" so then calling a 5:1 and 7.5:1 odd on that war really doesnt apply anymore as not every brug and chief in those fams prolly shot making those odds drop down way more, the just the number of high ranks in a fam.
so my point is consistency from your (personal) part in your replies as at one point you state that odds alone arent rly a figure to look upon just on its own, and then use an example from a previous war to state exactly the opposite of what you said.
as regarding to your mention of highranks dying those in general tell you alot more then just the number of deaths spread of the ranks. and give a nice overview in general of the dmg done to a family in the example above (having followed the war real time) you can quite clearly see by the number of deaths that empusa did not so much dmg to either siberia, as the countering fams did to empusa. in numbers of high ranks killed.
My statements aren't contradicting each other: The war was an outlier, and any measure in isolation is not meaningful. That doesn't mean it's not worth mentioning, as long as the numbers are accurate (which they are to our knowledge). The interpretation is up to the reader.
I'm ending this discussion, if you have any issue with the accuracy of any numbers contact a reporter directly. Further comments will be deleted.
Anonymous (23:56:12 - 04-02)
Siberia puss hiding as every time chicks :D
Anonymous (23:56:01 - 04-02)
Anonymous at 23:34:57 on 04/02:
if you take into account what you just said "odds alone generally doesn't paint a complete picture of any war". its kinda funny your comeback is now that the odds where so huge that it was worth a mention. following that logic this war shouldnt show odds at all cause it isnt an "outliner" in the odds of the highranks way.
as you quite clearly stated "not all the members shoot" so then calling a 5:1 and 7.5:1 odd on that war really doesnt apply anymore as not every brug and chief in those fams prolly shot making those odds drop down way more, the just the number of high ranks in a fam.
so my point is consistency from your (personal) part in your replies as at one point you state that odds alone arent rly a figure to look upon just on its own, and then use an example from a previous war to state exactly the opposite of what you said.
as regarding to your mention of highranks dying those in general tell you alot more then just the number of deaths spread of the ranks. and give a nice overview in general of the dmg done to a family in the example above (having followed the war real time) you can quite clearly see by the number of deaths that empusa did not so much dmg to either siberia, as the countering fams did to empusa. in numbers of high ranks killed.
MurderInc at 23:18:56 on 04/02:
That war was quite the outlier in that it was 6v1 with a 5:1 brug and 7.5:1 chief ratio. We also include deaths per family and deaths on the attacking and defending side. Those numbers aren't worth anything in isolation either, and we still include them. What's your issue? Use your brain while interpreting them and stop complaining about non-issues, or just don't read this site.
Anonymous at 23:09:36 on 04/02:
Yet you (OB writers) add them and only started doing it in the vinci war
* starts to wonder about that
MurderInc at 22:16:49 on 04/02:
Just looking at odds alone generally doesn't paint a complete picture of any war, even with all counters accounted for. It's a useful measure, but in most wars, not everyone is shooting everyone, and the individual ratios of fights between families involved can differ quite significantly from the overall ratio. It's also a lot of effort to keep track off, so we generally don't do that.
Anonymous at 21:32:20 on 04/02:
I don't think the ratio of the initial attack is important as most warplans do keep a counter of the bloods in mind. An update of this would give a way better view of what's going on in such war. The initial numbers would only confuse people and would only seem like an excuse in case you lose a war.
The odds were uprdated by soomeone though so that's cool.
Steffi at 21:17:40 on 04/02:
so you dont thik the initial attack is worth to mention in such a article ?? whom ever you are..
i think it has a very valid reason to be there
Anonymous at 21:08:13 on 04/02:
Nope tjey will never do it cause all the reporters here belongs to gayberia any they want :) they are allways right :P
Anonymous at 21:02:08 on 04/02:
You might as well remove that odds statistic now the counter has begun.
You might as well remove that odds statistic now the counter has begun.
Nope tjey will never do it cause all the reporters here belongs to gayberia any they want :) they are allways right :P
so you dont thik the initial attack is worth to mention in such a article ?? whom ever you are..
i think it has a very valid reason to be there
I don't think the ratio of the initial attack is important as most warplans do keep a counter of the bloods in mind. An update of this would give a way better view of what's going on in such war. The initial numbers would only confuse people and would only seem like an excuse in case you lose a war.
The odds were uprdated by soomeone though so that's cool.
Yet you (OB writers) add them and only started doing it in the vinci war
* starts to wonder about that
if you take into account what you just said "odds alone generally doesn't paint a complete picture of any war". its kinda funny your comeback is now that the odds where so huge that it was worth a mention. following that logic this war shouldnt show odds at all cause it isnt an "outliner" in the odds of the highranks way.
as you quite clearly stated "not all the members shoot" so then calling a 5:1 and 7.5:1 odd on that war really doesnt apply anymore as not every brug and chief in those fams prolly shot making those odds drop down way more, the just the number of high ranks in a fam.
so my point is consistency from your (personal) part in your replies as at one point you state that odds alone arent rly a figure to look upon just on its own, and then use an example from a previous war to state exactly the opposite of what you said.
as regarding to your mention of highranks dying those in general tell you alot more then just the number of deaths spread of the ranks. and give a nice overview in general of the dmg done to a family in the example above (having followed the war real time) you can quite clearly see by the number of deaths that empusa did not so much dmg to either siberia, as the countering fams did to empusa. in numbers of high ranks killed.
Yeah MurderInc I'm pretty curious about what have to say about this statement, speak now or forever hold your breath
anonymous (23:55:08 - 04-02)
Anonymous at 23:53:07 on 04/02:
funny thing --never see the odds when sib+ or ana+ are "cleaning" aint it ,when 20member fams are being hit by 300 member pacts .
Anonymous at 23:34:57 on 04/02:
if you take into account what you just said "odds alone generally doesn't paint a complete picture of any war". its kinda funny your comeback is now that the odds where so huge that it was worth a mention. following that logic this war shouldnt show odds at all cause it isnt an "outliner" in the odds of the highranks way.
as you quite clearly stated "not all the members shoot" so then calling a 5:1 and 7.5:1 odd on that war really doesnt apply anymore as not every brug and chief in those fams prolly shot making those odds drop down way more, the just the number of high ranks in a fam.
so my point is consistency from your (personal) part in your replies as at one point you state that odds alone arent rly a figure to look upon just on its own, and then use an example from a previous war to state exactly the opposite of what you said.
as regarding to your mention of highranks dying those in general tell you alot more then just the number of deaths spread of the ranks. and give a nice overview in general of the dmg done to a family in the example above (having followed the war real time) you can quite clearly see by the number of deaths that empusa did not so much dmg to either siberia, as the countering fams did to empusa. in numbers of high ranks killed.
MurderInc at 23:18:56 on 04/02:
That war was quite the outlier in that it was 6v1 with a 5:1 brug and 7.5:1 chief ratio. We also include deaths per family and deaths on the attacking and defending side. Those numbers aren't worth anything in isolation either, and we still include them. What's your issue? Use your brain while interpreting them and stop complaining about non-issues, or just don't read this site.
Anonymous at 23:09:36 on 04/02:
Yet you (OB writers) add them and only started doing it in the vinci war
* starts to wonder about that
MurderInc at 22:16:49 on 04/02:
Just looking at odds alone generally doesn't paint a complete picture of any war, even with all counters accounted for. It's a useful measure, but in most wars, not everyone is shooting everyone, and the individual ratios of fights between families involved can differ quite significantly from the overall ratio. It's also a lot of effort to keep track off, so we generally don't do that.
Anonymous at 21:32:20 on 04/02:
I don't think the ratio of the initial attack is important as most warplans do keep a counter of the bloods in mind. An update of this would give a way better view of what's going on in such war. The initial numbers would only confuse people and would only seem like an excuse in case you lose a war.
The odds were uprdated by soomeone though so that's cool.
Steffi at 21:17:40 on 04/02:
so you dont thik the initial attack is worth to mention in such a article ?? whom ever you are..
i think it has a very valid reason to be there
Anonymous at 21:08:13 on 04/02:
Nope tjey will never do it cause all the reporters here belongs to gayberia any they want :) they are allways right :P
Anonymous at 21:02:08 on 04/02:
You might as well remove that odds statistic now the counter has begun.
You might as well remove that odds statistic now the counter has begun.
Nope tjey will never do it cause all the reporters here belongs to gayberia any they want :) they are allways right :P
so you dont thik the initial attack is worth to mention in such a article ?? whom ever you are..
i think it has a very valid reason to be there
I don't think the ratio of the initial attack is important as most warplans do keep a counter of the bloods in mind. An update of this would give a way better view of what's going on in such war. The initial numbers would only confuse people and would only seem like an excuse in case you lose a war.
The odds were uprdated by soomeone though so that's cool.
Yet you (OB writers) add them and only started doing it in the vinci war
* starts to wonder about that
if you take into account what you just said "odds alone generally doesn't paint a complete picture of any war". its kinda funny your comeback is now that the odds where so huge that it was worth a mention. following that logic this war shouldnt show odds at all cause it isnt an "outliner" in the odds of the highranks way.
as you quite clearly stated "not all the members shoot" so then calling a 5:1 and 7.5:1 odd on that war really doesnt apply anymore as not every brug and chief in those fams prolly shot making those odds drop down way more, the just the number of high ranks in a fam.
so my point is consistency from your (personal) part in your replies as at one point you state that odds alone arent rly a figure to look upon just on its own, and then use an example from a previous war to state exactly the opposite of what you said.
as regarding to your mention of highranks dying those in general tell you alot more then just the number of deaths spread of the ranks. and give a nice overview in general of the dmg done to a family in the example above (having followed the war real time) you can quite clearly see by the number of deaths that empusa did not so much dmg to either siberia, as the countering fams did to empusa. in numbers of high ranks killed.
funny thing --never see the odds when sib+ or ana+ are "cleaning" aint it ,when 20member fams are being hit by 300 member pacts .
Anonymous (23:53:07 - 04-02)
Anonymous at 23:34:57 on 04/02:
if you take into account what you just said "odds alone generally doesn't paint a complete picture of any war". its kinda funny your comeback is now that the odds where so huge that it was worth a mention. following that logic this war shouldnt show odds at all cause it isnt an "outliner" in the odds of the highranks way.
as you quite clearly stated "not all the members shoot" so then calling a 5:1 and 7.5:1 odd on that war really doesnt apply anymore as not every brug and chief in those fams prolly shot making those odds drop down way more, the just the number of high ranks in a fam.
so my point is consistency from your (personal) part in your replies as at one point you state that odds alone arent rly a figure to look upon just on its own, and then use an example from a previous war to state exactly the opposite of what you said.
as regarding to your mention of highranks dying those in general tell you alot more then just the number of deaths spread of the ranks. and give a nice overview in general of the dmg done to a family in the example above (having followed the war real time) you can quite clearly see by the number of deaths that empusa did not so much dmg to either siberia, as the countering fams did to empusa. in numbers of high ranks killed.
MurderInc at 23:18:56 on 04/02:
That war was quite the outlier in that it was 6v1 with a 5:1 brug and 7.5:1 chief ratio. We also include deaths per family and deaths on the attacking and defending side. Those numbers aren't worth anything in isolation either, and we still include them. What's your issue? Use your brain while interpreting them and stop complaining about non-issues, or just don't read this site.
Anonymous at 23:09:36 on 04/02:
Yet you (OB writers) add them and only started doing it in the vinci war
* starts to wonder about that
MurderInc at 22:16:49 on 04/02:
Just looking at odds alone generally doesn't paint a complete picture of any war, even with all counters accounted for. It's a useful measure, but in most wars, not everyone is shooting everyone, and the individual ratios of fights between families involved can differ quite significantly from the overall ratio. It's also a lot of effort to keep track off, so we generally don't do that.
Anonymous at 21:32:20 on 04/02:
I don't think the ratio of the initial attack is important as most warplans do keep a counter of the bloods in mind. An update of this would give a way better view of what's going on in such war. The initial numbers would only confuse people and would only seem like an excuse in case you lose a war.
The odds were uprdated by soomeone though so that's cool.
Steffi at 21:17:40 on 04/02:
so you dont thik the initial attack is worth to mention in such a article ?? whom ever you are..
i think it has a very valid reason to be there
Anonymous at 21:08:13 on 04/02:
Nope tjey will never do it cause all the reporters here belongs to gayberia any they want :) they are allways right :P
Anonymous at 21:02:08 on 04/02:
You might as well remove that odds statistic now the counter has begun.
You might as well remove that odds statistic now the counter has begun.
Nope tjey will never do it cause all the reporters here belongs to gayberia any they want :) they are allways right :P
so you dont thik the initial attack is worth to mention in such a article ?? whom ever you are..
i think it has a very valid reason to be there
I don't think the ratio of the initial attack is important as most warplans do keep a counter of the bloods in mind. An update of this would give a way better view of what's going on in such war. The initial numbers would only confuse people and would only seem like an excuse in case you lose a war.
The odds were uprdated by soomeone though so that's cool.
Yet you (OB writers) add them and only started doing it in the vinci war
* starts to wonder about that
if you take into account what you just said "odds alone generally doesn't paint a complete picture of any war". its kinda funny your comeback is now that the odds where so huge that it was worth a mention. following that logic this war shouldnt show odds at all cause it isnt an "outliner" in the odds of the highranks way.
as you quite clearly stated "not all the members shoot" so then calling a 5:1 and 7.5:1 odd on that war really doesnt apply anymore as not every brug and chief in those fams prolly shot making those odds drop down way more, the just the number of high ranks in a fam.
so my point is consistency from your (personal) part in your replies as at one point you state that odds alone arent rly a figure to look upon just on its own, and then use an example from a previous war to state exactly the opposite of what you said.
as regarding to your mention of highranks dying those in general tell you alot more then just the number of deaths spread of the ranks. and give a nice overview in general of the dmg done to a family in the example above (having followed the war real time) you can quite clearly see by the number of deaths that empusa did not so much dmg to either siberia, as the countering fams did to empusa. in numbers of high ranks killed.
funny thing --never see the odds when sib+ or ana+ are "cleaning" aint it ,when 20member fams are being hit by 300 member pacts .
Anonymous (23:42:35 - 04-02)
Start a new topic admins vs cheamerta :)
Anonymous (23:34:57 - 04-02)
MurderInc at 23:18:56 on 04/02:
That war was quite the outlier in that it was 6v1 with a 5:1 brug and 7.5:1 chief ratio. We also include deaths per family and deaths on the attacking and defending side. Those numbers aren't worth anything in isolation either, and we still include them. What's your issue? Use your brain while interpreting them and stop complaining about non-issues, or just don't read this site.
Anonymous at 23:09:36 on 04/02:
Yet you (OB writers) add them and only started doing it in the vinci war
* starts to wonder about that
MurderInc at 22:16:49 on 04/02:
Just looking at odds alone generally doesn't paint a complete picture of any war, even with all counters accounted for. It's a useful measure, but in most wars, not everyone is shooting everyone, and the individual ratios of fights between families involved can differ quite significantly from the overall ratio. It's also a lot of effort to keep track off, so we generally don't do that.
Anonymous at 21:32:20 on 04/02:
I don't think the ratio of the initial attack is important as most warplans do keep a counter of the bloods in mind. An update of this would give a way better view of what's going on in such war. The initial numbers would only confuse people and would only seem like an excuse in case you lose a war.
The odds were uprdated by soomeone though so that's cool.
Steffi at 21:17:40 on 04/02:
so you dont thik the initial attack is worth to mention in such a article ?? whom ever you are..
i think it has a very valid reason to be there
Anonymous at 21:08:13 on 04/02:
Nope tjey will never do it cause all the reporters here belongs to gayberia any they want :) they are allways right :P
Anonymous at 21:02:08 on 04/02:
You might as well remove that odds statistic now the counter has begun.
You might as well remove that odds statistic now the counter has begun.
Nope tjey will never do it cause all the reporters here belongs to gayberia any they want :) they are allways right :P
so you dont thik the initial attack is worth to mention in such a article ?? whom ever you are..
i think it has a very valid reason to be there
I don't think the ratio of the initial attack is important as most warplans do keep a counter of the bloods in mind. An update of this would give a way better view of what's going on in such war. The initial numbers would only confuse people and would only seem like an excuse in case you lose a war.
The odds were uprdated by soomeone though so that's cool.
Yet you (OB writers) add them and only started doing it in the vinci war
* starts to wonder about that
if you take into account what you just said "odds alone generally doesn't paint a complete picture of any war". its kinda funny your comeback is now that the odds where so huge that it was worth a mention. following that logic this war shouldnt show odds at all cause it isnt an "outliner" in the odds of the highranks way.
as you quite clearly stated "not all the members shoot" so then calling a 5:1 and 7.5:1 odd on that war really doesnt apply anymore as not every brug and chief in those fams prolly shot making those odds drop down way more, the just the number of high ranks in a fam.
so my point is consistency from your (personal) part in your replies as at one point you state that odds alone arent rly a figure to look upon just on its own, and then use an example from a previous war to state exactly the opposite of what you said.
as regarding to your mention of highranks dying those in general tell you alot more then just the number of deaths spread of the ranks. and give a nice overview in general of the dmg done to a family in the example above (having followed the war real time) you can quite clearly see by the number of deaths that empusa did not so much dmg to either siberia, as the countering fams did to empusa. in numbers of high ranks killed.
Anonymous at 23:09:36 on 04/02:
Yet you (OB writers) add them and only started doing it in the vinci war
* starts to wonder about that
MurderInc at 22:16:49 on 04/02:
Just looking at odds alone generally doesn't paint a complete picture of any war, even with all counters accounted for. It's a useful measure, but in most wars, not everyone is shooting everyone, and the individual ratios of fights between families involved can differ quite significantly from the overall ratio. It's also a lot of effort to keep track off, so we generally don't do that.
Anonymous at 21:32:20 on 04/02:
I don't think the ratio of the initial attack is important as most warplans do keep a counter of the bloods in mind. An update of this would give a way better view of what's going on in such war. The initial numbers would only confuse people and would only seem like an excuse in case you lose a war.
The odds were uprdated by soomeone though so that's cool.
Steffi at 21:17:40 on 04/02:
so you dont thik the initial attack is worth to mention in such a article ?? whom ever you are..
i think it has a very valid reason to be there
Anonymous at 21:08:13 on 04/02:
Nope tjey will never do it cause all the reporters here belongs to gayberia any they want :) they are allways right :P
Anonymous at 21:02:08 on 04/02:
You might as well remove that odds statistic now the counter has begun.
You might as well remove that odds statistic now the counter has begun.
Nope tjey will never do it cause all the reporters here belongs to gayberia any they want :) they are allways right :P
so you dont thik the initial attack is worth to mention in such a article ?? whom ever you are..
i think it has a very valid reason to be there
I don't think the ratio of the initial attack is important as most warplans do keep a counter of the bloods in mind. An update of this would give a way better view of what's going on in such war. The initial numbers would only confuse people and would only seem like an excuse in case you lose a war.
The odds were uprdated by soomeone though so that's cool.
Yet you (OB writers) add them and only started doing it in the vinci war
* starts to wonder about that
Anonymous (23:09:36 - 04-02)
MurderInc at 22:16:49 on 04/02:
Just looking at odds alone generally doesn't paint a complete picture of any war, even with all counters accounted for. It's a useful measure, but in most wars, not everyone is shooting everyone, and the individual ratios of fights between families involved can differ quite significantly from the overall ratio. It's also a lot of effort to keep track off, so we generally don't do that.
Anonymous at 21:32:20 on 04/02:
I don't think the ratio of the initial attack is important as most warplans do keep a counter of the bloods in mind. An update of this would give a way better view of what's going on in such war. The initial numbers would only confuse people and would only seem like an excuse in case you lose a war.
The odds were uprdated by soomeone though so that's cool.
Steffi at 21:17:40 on 04/02:
so you dont thik the initial attack is worth to mention in such a article ?? whom ever you are..
i think it has a very valid reason to be there
Anonymous at 21:08:13 on 04/02:
Nope tjey will never do it cause all the reporters here belongs to gayberia any they want :) they are allways right :P
Anonymous at 21:02:08 on 04/02:
You might as well remove that odds statistic now the counter has begun.
You might as well remove that odds statistic now the counter has begun.
Nope tjey will never do it cause all the reporters here belongs to gayberia any they want :) they are allways right :P
so you dont thik the initial attack is worth to mention in such a article ?? whom ever you are..
i think it has a very valid reason to be there
I don't think the ratio of the initial attack is important as most warplans do keep a counter of the bloods in mind. An update of this would give a way better view of what's going on in such war. The initial numbers would only confuse people and would only seem like an excuse in case you lose a war.
The odds were uprdated by soomeone though so that's cool.
Yet you (OB writers) add them and only started doing it in the vinci war
* starts to wonder about that
Anonymous (23:09:13 - 04-02)
anonymous at 22:59:42 on 04/02:
no need to cease fire when you live in a safehouse
Anonymous at 22:43:26 on 04/02:
loooooool
anonymous at 22:42:20 on 04/02:
gambino cease fired !!!!
gambino cease fired !!!!
loooooool
who lives in a sh? sib?
anonymous (22:59:42 - 04-02)
Anonymous at 22:43:26 on 04/02:
loooooool
anonymous at 22:42:20 on 04/02:
gambino cease fired !!!!
gambino cease fired !!!!
loooooool
Anonymous (22:43:26 - 04-02)
anonymous at 22:42:20 on 04/02:
gambino cease fired !!!!
gambino cease fired !!!!
loooooool
In other news, Gambino education:
Daryl 05-Feb @ 00:08:31 Daryl totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Daryl
Maryjane 05-Feb @ 00:06:28 Maryjane totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Maryjane
Mu 05-Feb @ 00:00:17 Mu totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Mu
Glitterfart 04-Feb @ 23:57:05 Glitterfart totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Glitterfart
Shine 04-Feb @ 23:50:33 Shine totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Shine
Icecold 04-Feb @ 23:41:34 Icecold totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Icecold
Parcival 04-Feb @ 23:31:15 Parcival totally missed you, you hit back and did some damage to Parcival
That's how you use your don, top 3 and capos!
Noobs since v1.0